NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 26, 2024. Search: Author = S.Bacca Found 61 matches. 2024SO05 Phys.Rev. C 109, 025502 (2024) J.E.Sobczyk, B.Acharya, S.Bacca, G.Hagen 40Ca transverse response function from coupled-cluster theory
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.109.025502
2023AN15 J.Phys.(London) G50, 120501 (2023) A.M.Ankowski, A.Ashkenazi, S.Bacca, J.L.Barrow, M.Betancourt, A.Bodek, M.E.Christy, L.Doria, S.Dytman, A.Friedland, O.Hen, C.J.Horowitz, N.Jachowicz, W.Ketchum, T.Lux, K.Mahn, C.Mariani, J.Newby, V.Pandey, A.Papadopoulou, E.Radicioni, F.Sanchez, C.Sfienti, J.M.Udias, L.Weinstein, L.Alvarez-Ruso, J.E.Amaro, C.A.Arguelles, A.B.Balantekin, S.Bolognesi, V.Brdar, P.Butti, S.Carey, Z.Djurcic, O.Dvornikov, S.Edayath, S.Gardiner, J.Isaacson, W.Jay, A.Klustova, K.S.McFarland, A.Nikolakopoulos, A.Norrick, S.Pastore, G.Paz, M.H.Reno, I.Ruiz Simo, J.E.Sobczyk, A.Sousa, N.Toro, Y.-D.Tsai, M.Wagman, J.G.Walsh, G.Yang Electron scattering and neutrino physics
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/acef42
2023FE08 Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022044 (2023) R.W.Fearick, P.von Neumann-Cosel, S.Bacca, J.Birkhan, F.Bonaiti, I.Brandherm, G.Hagen, H.Matsubara, W.Nazarewicz, N.Pietralla, V.Yu.Ponomarev, P.-G.Reinhard, X.Roca-Maza, A.Richter, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis, and A.Tamii Electric dipole polarizability of 40Ca NUCLEAR REACTIONS 40Ca(p, p'), E=5-25 MeV; measured reaction products, Ep, Ip; deduced electric dipole strength distribution, σ(θ, E). Comparison with available data. The Grand Raiden spectrometer, RCNP, Osaka.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L022044
2023GI06 Phys.Rev.Lett. 130, 232301 (2023) S.Giraud, J.C.Zamora, R.G.T.Zegers, D.Bazin, Y.Ayyad, S.Bacca, S.Beceiro Novo, B.A.Brown, A.Carls, J.Chen, M.Cortesi, M.DeNudt, G.Hagen, C.Hultquist, C.Maher, W.Mittig, F.Ndayisabye, S.Noji, S.J.Novario, J.Pereira, Z.Rahman, J.Schmitt, M.Serikow, L.J.Sun, J.Surbrook, N.Watwood, T.Wheeler β+ Gamow-Teller Strengths from Unstable 14O via the (d, 2He) Reaction in Inverse Kinematics NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(14O, 2He), E=105 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products. 14O; deduced σ(θ), B(GT) or Gamow-Teller transition strength. Comparison with available data. The Coupled Cyclotron Facility at the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL), MSU.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.232301
2023KE04 Phys.Rev.Lett. 130, 152502 (2023) S.Kegel, P.Achenbach, S.Bacca, N.Barnea, J.Bericic, D.Bosnar, L.Correa, M.O.Distler, A.Esser, H.Fonvieille, I.Friscic, M.Heilig, P.Herrmann, M.Hoek, P.Klag, T.Kolar, W.Leidemann, H.Merkel, M.Mihovilovic, J.Muller, U.Muller, G.Orlandini, J.Pochodzalla, B.S.Schlimme, M.Schoth, F.Schulz, C.Sfienti, S.Sirca, R.Spreckels, Y.Stottinger, M.Thiel, A.Tyukin, T.Walcher, A.Weber Measurement of the α-Particle Monopole Transition Form Factor Challenges Theory: A Low-Energy Puzzle for Nuclear Forces? NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4He(e-, e-'), E=450, 690, 795 MeV; measured reaction products; deduced missing mass spectrum, monopole transition form factor, resonance parameters, modern nuclear forces, including those derived within chiral effective field theory fail to reproduce the excitation of the α particle. The Mainz Microtron MAMI.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.152502
2023SE18 Phys.Rev. C 108, 054005 (2023) R.Seutin, O.J.Hernandez, T.Miyagi, S.Bacca, K.Hebeler, S.Konig, A.Schwenk Magnetic dipole operator from chiral effective field theory for many-body expansion methods
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.054005
2022AK02 Phys.Rev. C 105, 024301 (2022) K.Akdogan, D.Layh, I.Weinberger, J.Simonis, N.Barnea, S.Bacca Removing center of mass effects in response function and sum rule calculations based on the harmonic oscillator basis
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.024301
2022BO02 Phys.Rev. C 105, 034313 (2022) Ab initio coupled-cluster calculations of ground and dipole excited states in 8He NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 8He; calculated ground-state energy, point-proton radius, dipole response function, dipole polarizability. Coupled-cluster calculations with the inclusion of leading-order three-particle three-hole excitations in the cluster operator. Comparison to experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.034313
2022LI43 J.Phys.(London) G49, 105101 (2022) S.S.Li Muli, B.Acharya, O.J.Hernandez, S.Bacca Bayesian analysis of nuclear polarizability corrections to the Lamb shift of muonic H-atoms and He-ions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2,3H, 3,4He(μ, X), E not given; analyzed available data of the nuclear-polarizability corrections to the Lamb shift with a Bayesian analysis.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ac81e0
2022MA04 Phys.Rev.Lett. 128, 022502 (2022) S.Malbrunot-Ettenauer, S.Kaufmann, S.Bacca, C.Barbieri, J.Billowes, M.L.Bissell, K.Blaum, B.Cheal, T.Duguet, R.F.Garcia Ruiz, W.Gins, C.Gorges, G.Hagen, H.Heylen, J.D.Holt, G.R.Jansen, A.Kanellakopoulos, M.Kortelainen, T.Miyagi, P.Navratil, W.Nazarewicz, R.Neugart, G.Neyens, W.Nortershauser, S.J.Novario, T.Papenbrock, T.Ratajczyk, P.-G.Reinhard, L.V.Rodriguez, R.Sanchez, S.Sailer, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis, V.Soma, S.R.Stroberg, L.Wehner, C.Wraith, L.Xie, Z.Y.Xu, X.F.Yang, D.T.Yordanov Nuclear Charge Radii of the Nickel Isotopes 58-68, 70Ni NUCLEAR MOMENTS 58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68Ni, 70Ni; measured frequency-time spectrum; deduced isotope shifts, mean-square charge radii. Comparison with ab initio approaches. Collinear laser spectroscopy beam line COLLAPS, ISOLDE/CERN.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.022502
2022SO15 Phys.Rev. C 106, 034310 (2022) J.E.Sobczyk, S.Bacca, G.Hagen, T.Papenbrock Spectral function for 4He using the Chebyshev expansion in coupled-cluster theory NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4He(e, e'), at momentum transfers q ≈ 270-670 MeV; calculated intrinsic momentum distribution, and compared with that in laboratory system, spectral functions, differential σ(momentum transfer) using coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles (CCSD) approximation, with an expansion of integral transforms into Chebyshev polynomials.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.034310
2021AC02 Phys.Rev. C 103, 024001 (2021) B.Acharya, V.Lensky, S.Bacca, M.Gorchtein, M.Vanderhaeghen Dispersive evaluation of the Lamb shift in muonic deuterium from chiral effective field theory NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(γ, X), E<80 MeV; 2H(e-, X), E=80, 146.9, 175, 180, 222.6, 292.8 MeV; calculated deuteron photodisintegration σ(E), deuteron electrodissociation differential σ(E, θ), deuteron response functions and corresponding uncertainties up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order in chiral effective field theory (χEFT), longitudinal and transverse contributions. Comparison with experimental data. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 2H; calculated nuclear polarizability two-photon exchange corrections to the muonic deuterium (μD) Lamb shift by combining dispersion relations with ab initio approach to compute nuclear structure corrections using chiral effective field theory. Comparison with results of previous calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.024001
2021FR01 Phys.Rev.Lett. 126, 102501 (2021) U.Friman-Gayer, C.Romig, T.Huther, K.Albe, S.Bacca, T.Beck, M.Berger, J.Birkhan, K.Hebeler, O.J.Hernandez, J.Isaak, S.Konig, N.Pietralla, P.C.Ries, J.Rohrer, R.Roth, D.Savran, M.Scheck, A.Schwenk, R.Seutin, V.Werner Role of Chiral Two-Body Currents in 6Li Magnetic Properties in Light of a New Precision Measurement with the Relative Self-Absorption Technique RADIOACTIVITY 6Li(IT) [from 6Li(γ, γ'), E<7.1 MeV]; measured decay products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced B(M1), decay width. Comparison with ab initio calculations based on chiral effective field theory that take into account contributions to the magnetic dipole operator beyond leading order.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.102501
2021SO24 Phys.Rev.Lett. 127, 072501 (2021) J.E.Sobczyk, B.Acharya, S.Bacca, G.Hagen Ab Initio Computation of the Longitudinal Response Function in 40Ca NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 40Ca; calculated longitudinal response function using the coupled-cluster and Lorentz integral transform methods starting from chiral nucleon-nucleon and three-nucleon interactions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.072501
2020AC01 Phys.Rev. C 101, 015505 (2020) Neutrino-deuteron scattering: Uncertainty quantification and new Λ1, A constraints NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(ν, ν'), (ν-bar, ν-bar'), E=threshold-150 MeV; calculated deuteron dissociation σ(E) with uncertainty estimates using chiral effective field theory (χEFT). Comparison with previous theoretical calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.015505
2020BA35 Phys.Rev. C 102, 014320 (2020) R.B.Baker, K.D.Launey, S.Bacca, N.N.Dinur, T.Dytrych Benchmark calculations of electromagnetic sum rules with a symmetry-adapted basis and hyperspherical harmonics NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He; calculated ground state energy, point-proton rms radius, nonenergy and energy weighted sum rules for monopole and dipole transitions, electric dipole polarizability, quadrupole sum rule. Calculations used ab initio symmetry-adapted no-core shell model (SA-NCSM) with the Lanczos algorithm, and JISP16 and N3LO-EM nucleon-nucleon interactions. Comparison with other model predictions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.014320
2020KA22 Phys.Rev.Lett. 124, 132502 (2020) S.Kaufmann, J.Simonis, S.Bacca, J.Billowes, M.L.Bissell, K.Blaum, B.Cheal, R.F.Garcia Ruiz, W.Gins, C.Gorges, G.Hagen, H.Heylen, A.Kanellakopoulos, S.Malbrunot-Ettenauer, M.Miorelli, R.Neugart, G.Neyens, W.Nortershauser, R.Sanchez, S.Sailer, A.Schwenk, T.Ratajczyk, L.V.Rodriguez, L.Wehner, C.Wraith, L.Xie, Z.Y.Xu, X.F.Yang, D.T.Yordanov Charge Radius of the Short-Lived 68Ni and Correlation with the Dipole Polarizability NUCLEAR MOMENTS 58,60,61,62,64,68Ni; measured frequencies; deduced resonance spectra, isotope shifts, nuclear charge radii. Comparison with novel coupled-cluster calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.132502
2020SO21 Phys.Rev. C 102, 064312 (2020) J.E.Sobczyk, B.Acharya, S.Bacca, G.Hagen Coulomb sum rule for 4He and 16O from coupled-cluster theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He, 16O; calculated Coulomb sum rule (CSR), squared elastic form factors, spurious 1- states as functions of the momentum transfer of 0-500 MeV. Coupled-cluster theory using interactions from chiral effective field theory (EFT). Relevance to improving understanding of neutrino-nucleus scattering process.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.064312
2019DI06 Phys.Rev. C 99, 034004 (2019) N.N.Dinur, O.J.Hernandez, S.Bacca, N.Barnea, C.Ji, S.Pastore, M.Piarulli, R.B.Wiringa Zemach moments and radii of 2, 3H and 3, 4He NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 2,3H, 3,4He; calculated Zemach electromagnetic moments, charge radii, ground-state wave-functions using various few-body methods, such as Numerov algorithm or the harmonic oscillator expansion method for A=2 nuclei, and Monte Carlo (VMC) and Green's function Monte Carlo (GFMC) methods, with hyperspherical harmonics (HH) expansions and momentum-space formulation (HH-p), and the effective interaction scheme in coordinate space (EIHH). Comparison with experimental values. Benchmarking of electromagnetic moments relevant to ongoing experimental efforts of muon-nucleus systems, and to muonic atom data measured by the CREMA collaboration at the Paul Scherrer Institute.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.034004
2019HE18 Phys.Rev. C 100, 064315 (2019) O.J.Hernandez, C.Ji, S.Bacca, N.Barnea Probing uncertainties of nuclear structure corrections in light muonic atoms
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.064315
2019PA55 Phys.Rev. C 100, 061304 (2019) C.G.Payne, S.Bacca, G.Hagen, W.G.Jiang, T.Papenbrock Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on 40Ar from first principles NUCLEAR REACTIONS 40Ar(ν, ν), E<50 MeV; calculated charge and weak form factors, neutron skin radius, coherent scattering σ(E) using coupled-cluster theory based on nuclear Hamiltonians inspired by effective field theories of quantum chromodynamics; deduced that nuclear physics uncertainties will likely not limit the sensitivity to new physics. Comparison to data from electron scattering experiments. Estimation of systematic uncertainties.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.061304
2019SI46 Eur.Phys.J. A 55, 241 (2019) First principles electromagnetic responses in medium-mass nuclei
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2019-12825-0
2018HE03 Phys.Lett. B 778, 377 (2018) O.J.Hernandez, A.Ekstrom, N.N.Dinur, C.Ji, S.Bacca, N.Barnea The deuteron-radius puzzle is alive: A new analysis of nuclear structure uncertainties NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 2H; analyzed available data; deduced discrepancy between the calculated and the corresponding experimental deuteron radii.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.01.043
2018JI05 J.Phys.(London) G45, 093002 (2018) C.Ji, S.Bacca, N.Barnea, O.J.Hernandez, N.N.Dinur Ab initio calculation of nuclear-structure corrections in muonic atoms NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1,2,3H, 3,4He(μ, X), E not given; calculated nuclear-structure corrections to the Lamb shift energy of muonic atoms.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/aad3eb
2018MI09 Phys.Rev. C 98, 014324 (2018) M.Miorelli, S.Bacca, G.Hagen, T.Papenbrock Computing the dipole polarizability of 48Ca with increased precision NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He, 16O, 48Ca; calculated electromagnetic, and polarizability sum rules, electric dipole polarizability of 48Ca by benchmarking 4He and 16O results. Coupled-cluster method by including leading order 3p-3h correlations for the ground state, excited states, and the similarity-transformed operator. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.014324
2017BI09 Phys.Rev.Lett. 118, 252501 (2017) J.Birkhan, M.Miorelli, S.Bacca, S.Bassauer, C.A.Bertulani, G.Hagen, H.Matsubara, P.von Neumann-Cosel, T.Papenbrock, N.Pietralla, V.Yu.Ponomarev, A.Richter, A.Schwenk, A.Tamii Electric Dipole Polarizability of 48Ca and Implications for the Neutron Skin NUCLEAR REACTIONS 48Ca(p, p'), E=295 MeV; 48Ca(γ, X), E<25 MeV; measured reaction products; deduced σ, electric dipole polarizability, B(E1).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.252501
2016HA27 Nat.Phys. 12, 186 (2016) G.Hagen, A.Ekstrom, C.Forssen, G.R.Jansen, W.Nazarewicz, T.Papenbrock, K.A.Wendt, S.Bacca, N.Barnea, B.Carlsson, C.Drischler, K.Hebeler, M.Hjorth-Jensen, M.Miorelli, G.Orlandini, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis Neutron and weak-charge distributions of the 48Ca nucleus NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 48Ca; calculated neutron skin parameters, radii. Ab initio calculations.
doi: 10.1038/nphys3529
2016MI19 Phys.Rev. C 94, 034317 (2016) M.Miorelli, S.Bacca, N.Barnea, G.Hagen, G.R.Jansen, G.Orlandini, T.Papenbrock Electric dipole polarizability from first principles calculations NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He, 16,22O, 40Ca; calculated electric dipole polarizability, photoabsorption response functions. Coupled-cluster method with bound-state techniques, and using different interactions from chiral effective field theory. Comparison with experimental data. Relevance to radii of proton and neutron distributions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.034317
2015BA08 Phys.Rev. C 91, 024303 (2015) S.Bacca, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Examination of the first excited state of 4He as a potential breathing mode NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He; calculated inelastic isoscalar monopole (InISM) strength distribution within a few-body ab initio approach, energy of the excited 0+ state, transition density between the ground state and the 0+ resonance state, transition form factor, q-dependence and sum rule. Lorentz integral transform and hyperspherical harmonics expansion. Focus on 0+ resonance. Discussed breathing mode.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.024303
2015SH15 Phys.Rev. C 91, 042801 (2015) Neutrino-pair bremsstrahlung from nucleon-α versus nucleon-nucleon scattering
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.042801
2014BA49 J.Phys.(London) G41, 123002 (2014) Electromagnetic reactions on light nuclei
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/41/12/123002
2014BA62 Phys.Rev. C 90, 064619 (2014) S.Bacca, N.Barnea, G.Hagen, M.Miorelli, G.Orlandini, T.Papenbrock Giant and pigmy dipole resonances in 4He, 16, 22O, and 40Ca from chiral nucleon-nucleon interactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4He, 16,22O, 40Ca(γ, n), E not given; calculated dipole response functions using Lorentz integral transform combined with the CC method (LITCC), GDR and PDR, low-lying E1 strength in 22O, electric dipole polarizability in 40Ca. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.064619
2014DI06 Phys.Rev. C 89, 064317 (2014) N.N.Dinur, N.Barnea, C.Ji, S.Bacca Efficient method for evaluating energy-dependent sum rules NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He; calculated energy-dependent sum rule (EDSR) for unretarded E1 response. Comparison with other methods. Lorentz integral transform method and the Lanczos algorithm. Use in electroweak reactions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.064317
2014EK01 Phys.Rev.Lett. 113, 262504 (2014) A.Ekstrom, G.R.Jansen, K.A.Wendt, G.Hagen, T.Papenbrock, S.Bacca, B.Carlsson, D.Gazit Effects of Three-Nucleon Forces and Two-Body Currents on Gamow-Teller Strengths RADIOACTIVITY 14C, 22,24O(β-); calculated quenching factor; deduced a novel coupled-cluster technique for the computation of spectra in the daughter nuclei and made several predictions and spin assignments in the exotic neutron-rich isotopes of fluorine. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 14N, 22,24F; calculated energy levels, J, π.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.262504
2014JI11 Few-Body Systems 55, 917 (2014) C.Ji, N.N.Dinur, S.Bacca, N.Barnea Nuclear Polarization Effects in Muonic Atoms
doi: 10.1007/s00601-014-0809-3
2014OR05 Few-Body Systems 55, 907 (2014) G.Orlandini, S.Bacca, N.Barnea, G.Hagen, M.Miorelli, T.Papenbrock Coupling the Lorentz Integral Transform (LIT) and the Coupled Cluster (CC) Methods: A Way Towards Continuum Spectra of "Not-So-Few-Body" System NUCLEAR REACTIONS 16O, 40Ca(γ, X), E=10-20 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced resonance parameters for the giant dipole resonance. LIT and CC calculations.
doi: 10.1007/s00601-013-0772-4
2013BA04 Phys.Rev.Lett. 110, 042503 (2013) S.Bacca, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Isoscalar Monopole Resonance of the Alpha Particle: A Prism to Nuclear Hamiltonians NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H, 3,4He; calculated ground-state energies with N3LO and N2LO, transition form factors. Ab initio study.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.042503
2013BA47 Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 122502 (2013) S.Bacca, N.Barnea, G.Hagen, G.Orlandini, T.Papenbrock First Principles Description of the Giant Dipole Resonance in 16O NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 16O; calculated giant dipole resonance parameters, position and strength. Nucleon-nucleon interaction, comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.122502
2012BA41 Phys.Rev. C 86, 034321 (2012) Matter and charge radius of 6He in the hyperspherical-harmonics approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4,6He; calculated binding energy, point-proton and matter radii using two-body low-momentum interactions based on chiral effective field theory (EFT) potentials. Discussed importance of three-nucleon forces. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.034321
2012BR03 Phys.Rev.Lett. 108, 052504 (2012) M.Brodeur, T.Brunner, C.Champagne, S.Ettenauer, M.J.Smith, A.Lapierre, R.Ringle, V.L.Ryjkov, S.Bacca, P.Delheij, G.W.F.Drake, D.Lunney, A.Schwenk, J.Dilling First Direct Mass Measurement of the Two-Neutron Halo Nucleus 6He and Improved Mass for the Four-Neutron Halo 8He ATOMIC MASSES 6,8He; measured TOF resonance spectra; deduced isotopic shifts, charge radii, masses. Comparison with experimental and theoretical data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.052504
2012GO24 Phys.Rev. C 86, 064316 (2012) Nuclear electric polarizability of 6He NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 6He; calculated nuclear electric polarizability αE based on hyperspherical harmonics expansion with simple semirealistic potentials using six-body microscopic calculations. Correlation between αE and S(2n), αE and neutron skin radius. Comparison with polarizability for 4He. Disagreement of calculated αE for 6He halo nucleus with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.064316
2011BA50 J.Phys.:Conf.Ser. 312, 082011 (2011) S.Bacca, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Three-nucleon forces effects in the electron scattering off 4He NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4He(e, e'), E at 50-, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350 MeV/c; calculated longitudinal response function using full four-body continuum dynamics via Lorentz integral transform. Compared with data.
doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/312/4/082011
2009BA13 Phys.Rev.Lett. 102, 162501 (2009) S.Bacca, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Role of the Final-State Interaction and Three-Body Force on the Longitudinal Response Function of 4He
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.162501
2009BA40 Phys.Rev. C 80, 032802 (2009) S.Bacca, K.Hally, C.J.Pethick, A.Schwenk Chiral effective field theory calculations of neutrino processes in dense matter
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.032802
2009BA54 Phys.Rev. C 80, 064001 (2009) S.Bacca, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Search for three-nucleon force effects on the longitudinal response function of 4He NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4He(e, e'), E at 50-500 MeV/c; calculated longitudinal response functions, isovector and isoscalar multipole strength distribution, and Coulomb sum rule (CSR) using the Argonne V18 nucleon-nucleon interaction and three-nucleon force models. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.064001
2009BA61 Eur.Phys.J. A 42, 553 (2009) S.Bacca, A.Schwenk, G.Hagen, T.Papenbrock Helium halo nuclei from low-momentum interactions NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4,6,8He; calculated ground-state energies. Comparison with data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2009-10815-5
2008BA39 Phys.Rev. C 78, 044306 (2008) Long range tensor correlations in charge and parity projected fermionic molecular dynamics NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He; calculated energies of 0+ states. Fermionic molecular dynamics. Long-range tensor correlations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.044306
2007BA32 Phys.Rev. C 75, 044001 (2007) Photodisintegration of light nuclei for testing a correlated realistic interaction in the continuum NUCLEAR REACTIONS 3H, 3He, 4He(γ, X), E=45-140 MeV; calculated photoabsorption and photodisintegration cross sections using the correlated Argonne V18 potential, compared results to available data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.75.044001
2007BA48 Phys.Rev. C 76, 014003 (2007) S.Bacca, H.Arenhovel, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Inclusive electron scattering off 4He
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.76.014003
2007BA51 Nucl.Phys. A790, 360c (2007) S.Bacca, H.Arenhovel, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Inclusive electron scattering off 4He NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4He(e, e'), E not given; calculated longitudinal and transverse response functions. Comparison with data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.03.065
2007OR05 Nucl.Phys. A790, 368c (2007) G.Orlandini, S.Bacca, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann Test of J-matrix inverse scattering potentials on photonuclear reactions of A=2, 3, 4 nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2,3H, 3,4He(γ, X), E=2-100 MeV; calculated total photoabsorption σ. J-matrix inverse scattering potential models. Comparison with data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.03.067
2007QU02 Nucl.Phys. A790, 372c (2007) S.Quaglioni, I.Stetcu, S.Bacca, B.R.Barrett, C.W.Johnson, P.Navratil, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Benchmark calculation of inclusive responses in the four-body nuclear system NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He; calculated quadrupole response function. No-core shell model, effective interaction hyperspherical harmonic approach.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.03.068
2007ST05 Nucl.Phys. A785, 307 (2007) I.Stetcu, S.Quaglioni, S.Bacca, B.R.Barrett, C.W.Johnson, P.Navratil, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Benchmark calculation of inclusive electromagnetic responses in the four-body nuclear system NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He; calculated ground-state energy, quadrupole and dipole response functions. No-core shell model, effective interaction hyperspherical harmonic approaches.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.12.047
2006BA27 Phys.Rev. C 73, 054608 (2006) Resonant tunneling in a schematic model
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.054608
2006GA12 Phys.Rev.Lett. 96, 112301 (2006) D.Gazit, S.Bacca, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Photoabsorption on 4He with a Realistic Nuclear Force NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4He(γ, X), E ≈ 20-140 MeV; calculated total photoabsorption σ; deduced three-nucleon force effects. Realistic nucleon-nucleon potentials, comparison with data. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He; calculated binding energy, radius.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.112301
2006GA39 Phys.Rev.C 74, 061001 (2006) D.Gazit, N.Barnea, S.Bacca, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Photonuclear sum rules and the tetrahedral configuration of 4He NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He; calculated photonuclear sum rules, possible deviation from tetrahedral symmetry. Photodisintegration, ab initio calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.061001
2004BA44 Phys.Rev. C 69, 057001 (2004) S.Bacca, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Effect of P-wave interaction in 6He and 6Li photoabsorption NUCLEAR REACTIONS 6He, 6Li(γ, X), E=0-100 MeV; calculated total photoabsorption σ, contribution from P-wave interaction. Lorentz integral transform method, comparison with data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.69.057001
2004BA66 Few-Body Systems 34, 127 (2004) N.Barnea, S.Bacca, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Photodisintegration of Light Nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 6He, 6Li(γ, X), E=0-100 MeV; calculated photoabsorption σ. Lorentz integral transform method.
doi: 10.1007/s00601-004-0034-6
2004BA94 Phys.Lett. B 603, 159 (2004) S.Bacca, H.Arenhovel, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Ab initio calculation of 7Li photodisintegration NUCLEAR REACTIONS 7Li(γ, X), E=threshold-100 MeV; calculated photoabsorption σ. Microscopic approach, comparison with data.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.10.025
2004LE19 Nucl.Phys. A737, 231 (2004) W.Leidemann, S.Bacca, N.Barnea, G.Orlandini Effective Interaction Method for Hyperspherical Harmonics
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.03.081
2002BA70 Phys.Rev.Lett. 89, 052502 (2002) S.Bacca, M.A.Marchisio, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Microscopic Calculation of Six-Body Inelastic Reactions with Complete Final State Interaction: Photoabsorption of 6He and 6Li NUCLEAR REACTIONS 6He, 6Li(γ, X), E=0-100 MeV; calculated total σ. Lorentz integral transform method, full six-nucleon final state interaction, comparison with data. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 6He, 6Li; calculated binding energies, radii.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.052502
Back to query form |