NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = I.Stetcu Found 72 matches. 2023GI01 Phys.Rev. C 107, 014612 (2023) N.P.Giha, S.Marin, J.A.Baker, I.E.Hernandez, K.J.Kelly, M.Devlin, J.M.O'Donnell, R.Vogt, J.Randrup, P.Talou, I.Stetcu, A.E.Lovell, O.Litaize, O.Serot, A.Chebboubi, C.-Y.Wu, S.D.Clarke, S.A.Pozzi Correlations between energy and γ-ray emission in 239Pu(n, f) NUCLEAR REACTIONS 239Pu(n, f), E=2-40 MeV; measured fragments, En, In, Eγ, Iγ, (fragments)γ-coin, (fragment)n-coin, nγ-coin; deduced γ spectrum, γ multiplicity, linear relation between incident neutron energy and γ multiplicity. Comparison to fission model calculations done with CGMF, FIFRELIN and FREYA codes. Multiplicity results are compared to ENDF/B-VIII.0 data and to experimental data on 238U(n, F), 239Pu(d, F), 233Pu(d, F), 240Pu(d, F) reactions. Broad-spectrum neutron beam produced via spallation reaction of an 800 MeV proton beam on W target (Los Alamos Neutron Science Center). Chi-Nu liquid scintillator array, a hemispherical array of 54 EJ-309 (n- and γ- measurement) surrounding multifoil parallel-plate avalanche counter (PPAC) serving as target and contain ing 239Pu (fragment measurement).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.014612
2023KA11 Phys.Rev. C 107, 044608 (2023) T.Kawano, A.E.Lovell, S.Okumura, H.Sasaki, I.Stetcu, P.Talou Consideration of memory of spin and parity in the fissioning compound nucleus by applying the Hauser-Feshbach fission fragment decay model to photonuclear reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(n, X), (γ, X), E<20 MeV; calculated partial population of compound nucleus. 235,238U, 239Pu(γ, F), E=1-20 MeV; calculated prompt fission γ-ray spectra, average number of prompt and delayed neutrons, total kinetic energies, cumulative fission product yields. Hauser-Feshbach statistical calculations of fission fragment decay with HF3D model. Comparison to experimental results and IAEA evaluation.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.044608
2023LE08 Phys.Rev. C 108, 014608 (2023) E.Leal-Cidoncha, A.Couture, E.M.Bond, T.A.Bredeweg, C.Fry, T.Kawano, A.E.Lovell, G.Rusev, I.Stetcu, J.L.Ullmann, L.Leal, M.T.Pigni Measurement of the neutron-induced capture-to-fission cross section ratio in 233U at LANSCE NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), (n, γ), E=0.007-250 keV; measured Eγ, Iγ, γ-sum, En, In, nγ-coin; deduced capture-to-fission σ ratio, σ(E) of (n, γ) reaction derived from obtained ratio and ENDF/B-VIII.0 fission σ. Comparison to other experimental data, statistical model calculations and data from ENDF/B-VIII.0, JEFF-3.3, and JENDL-5 libraries. Discussed impact of the data on Th-U fuel cycle. Detector for Advanced Neutron Capture Experiments (DANCE) γ-calorimeter composed of 160 BaF2 crystals combined with the neutron detector array at DANCE (NEUANCE) composed of 21 stilbene crystals at Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE, LANL).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.014608
2023MU06 Phys.Rev. C 107, 034606 (2023) M.R.Mumpower, D.Neudecker, H.Sasaki, T.Kawano, A.E.Lovell, M.W.Herman, I.Stetcu, M.Dupuis Collective enhancement in the exciton model NUCLEAR REACTIONS 239Pu(n, 2n), E=6-24 MeV; calculated σ(E). 239Pu(n, xn), E=14 MeV; 181Ta, 165(n, xn), E=20 MeV; calculated neutron emission spectra. Calculation with statistical model framework CoH3 with increased one-particle-one-hole state density used in the exciton model. Comparison to experimental data and ENDF/B-VIII.0. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 239Pu; calculated 1p-1h state densities.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.034606
2023SA19 Phys.Rev. C 107, 054312 (2023) Quasiparticle random-phase approximation calculations for M1 transitions with the noniterative finite-amplitude method and application to neutron radiative capture cross sections NUCLEAR REACTIONS 156Gd(γ, X), E<20 MeV; calculated total photoabsorption σ(E) of the M1 and E1 transitions, B(M1) strength functions of the M1 transitions, scissor mode excitations with and without spurious mode. 156,157,158,161Gd(n, X), E=0.001-15 MeV; calculated capture σ(E). Calculations of magnetic dipole transitions in the framework of finite amplitude method of quasiparticle random-phase approximation (FAM-QRPA) with the Hartree-Fock+Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer(HF+BCS) single-particle states. Comparison to experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.054312
2023SC16 Phys.Rev. C 108, L061602 (2023) G.Scamps, I.Abdurrahman, M.Kafker, A.Bulgac, I.Stetcu Spatial orientation of the fission fragment intrinsic spins and their correlations
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.L061602
2023ST12 Phys.Rev. C 108, L031306 (2023) Projection algorithm for state preparation on quantum computers
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.L031306
2022BU05 Phys.Rev.Lett. 128, 022501 (2022) A.Bulgac, I.Abdurrahman, K.Godbey, I.Stetcu Fragment Intrinsic Spins and Fragments' Relative Orbital Angular Momentum in Nuclear Fission NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U, 239Pu(n, F), E not given; analyzed available data. 236U, 240Pu; calculated of the primary fission fragment intrinsic spins and of the fission fragments relative orbital angular momentum using the time-dependent density functional theory framework. RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); analyzed available data; calculated of the primary fission fragment intrinsic spins and of the fission fragments relative orbital angular momentum using the time-dependent density functional theory framework.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.022501
2022GA37 Nucl.Instrum.Methods Phys.Res. A1037, 166853 (2022) P.Gastis, J.R.Winkelbauer, D.S.Connolly, S.A.Kuvin, S.M.Mosby, C.J.Prokop, I.Stetcu Absolute mass calibration of fission product distributions measured with the E-υ method RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); measured decay products, Eγ, Iγ. 92Rb; deduced fission product yields. The single-arm SPIDER spectrometer.
doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2022.166853
2022SA16 Phys.Rev. C 105, 044311 (2022) Noniterative finite amplitude methods for E1 and M1 giant resonances NUCLEAR REACTIONS 16O, 40,48Ca, 54Fe, 154Sm, 208Pb, 238U(γ, X), E<40 MeV; calculated photoabsorption σ(E), E1 and M1 strengths distributions, giant dipole resonance features. Finite amplitude method (FAM) used to solve the fully self-consistent random phase approximation equations (FAM-RPA method). Comparison to experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.044311
2022ST05 Phys.Rev. C 105, 064308 (2022) Variational approaches to constructing the many-body nuclear ground state for quantum computing NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 6He, 8Be, 20O, 22O; calculated ground state energy. Gate-based quantum hardware using variational algorithms. Discussed the perspectives of quantum computing for calculation of nuclear states.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.064308
2021BU03 Phys.Rev.Lett. 126, 142502 (2021) A.Bulgac, I.Abdurrahman, S.Jin, K.Godbey, N.Schunck, I.Stetcu Fission Fragment Intrinsic Spins and Their Correlations RADIOACTIVITY 236U, 240Pu(SF); calculated fission fragment intrinsic spins and their correlations using two nuclear energy density functionals.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.142502
2021KA34 Phys.Rev. C 104, 014611 (2021) T.Kawano, S.Okumura, A.E.Lovell, I.Stetcu, P.Talou Influence of nonstatistical properties in nuclear structure on emission of prompt fission neutrons NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E=thermal; calculated prompt fission E(n), I(n), individual contribution from each fission fragment to prompt fission neutron spectrum (PFNS) using Hauser-Feshbach fission-fragment decay (HF3D) model. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.014611
2021LO02 Phys.Rev. C 103, 014615 (2021) A.E.Lovell, T.Kawano, S.Okumura, I.Stetcu, M.R.Mumpower, P.Talou Extension of the Hauser-Feshbach fission fragment decay model to multichance fission NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E=0-20 MeV; calculated multichance fission probabilities, average excitation energy causing fission for first-, second-, third-, and fourth-chance fission, pre-neutron-emission mass yields, total kinetic energy (TKE) and average prompt neutron and γ-ray multiplicities as function of incident neutron energy, average neutron multiplicity as a function of fragment mass, prompt fission γ-ray spectrum, independent and cumulative fission mass yields, average number of delayed neutrons emitted in fission. Extended deterministic Hauser-Feshbach fission fragment decay model (HF3D) within the code BeoH to calculate prompt and delayed particle emission from fission fragments. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.014615
2021MA54 Phys.Rev. C 104, 024602 (2021) S.Marin, M.S.Okar, E.P.Sansevero, I.E.Hernandez, C.A.Ballard, R.Vogt, J.Randrup, P.Talou, A.E.Lovell, I.Stetcu, O.Serot, O.Litaize, A.Chebboubi, S.D.Clarke, V.A.Protopopescu, S.A.Pozzi Structure in the event-by-event energy-dependent neutron-γ multiplicity correlations in 252Cf(sf) RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); analyzed Eγ and E(n) data collected at the Chi-Nu array at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center with the application of the normalized differential multiplicity covariances; deduced neutron-γ correlations, evidence for enhancements in neutron-γ correlations around Eγ=0.7 and 1.2 MeV. Comparison with model calculations. Relevance to disagreement in the literature about correlations between neutron-γ competition and fragment properties.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024602
2021NE06 Phys.Rev. C 104, 034611 (2021) D.Neudecker, O.Cabellos, A.R.Clark, M.J.Grosskopf, W.Haeck, M.W.Herman, J.Hutchinson, T.Kawano, A.E.Lovell, I.Stetcu, P.Talou, S.Vander Wiel Informing nuclear physics via machine learning methods with differential and integral experiments NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(n, n'), E=14 MeV; analyzed pulsed-sphere neutron-leakage experimental spectrum obtained at LLNL facility, and compared with evaluated data in ENDF/B-VIII.0. 241Pu(n, F), E=0.1-1.0, 14 MeV; analyzed differential and integral experimental data for fission σ(E) by combining experimental σ data, nuclear-physics theory and neutron-transport simulations of the experiments using machine learning (ML) random forest algorithm and expert judgment. Relevance to improvement of description of nuclear-physics observables in particular application areas.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.034611
2021ST18 Phys.Rev.Lett. 127, 222502 (2021) I.Stetcu, A.E.Lovell, P.Talou, T.Kawano, S.Marin, S.A.Pozzi, A.Bulgac Angular Momentum Removal by Neutron and γ-Ray Emissions during Fission Fragment Decays NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U, 239Pu(n, F), E thermal; 238U(n, F), E=1.9 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced the angular momentum removal from fission fragments through neutron and γ-ray emission, wide angular momentum removal distributions can hide any underlying correlations in the fission fragment initial spin values. RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); analyzed available data; deduced the angular momentum removal from fission fragments through neutron and γ-ray emission.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.222502
2021TA33 Comput.Phys.Commun. 269, 108087 (2021) P.Talou, I.Stetcu, P.Jaffke, M.E.Rising, A.E.Lovell, T.Kawano Fission fragment decay simulations with the CGMFcode RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); calculated fission fragment mass yields. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E=0.0000000253, 2, 5 MeV; calculated fission fragment mass yields.
doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108087
2020BE28 J.Phys.(London) G47, 113002 (2020) M.Bender, R.Bernard, G.Bertsch, S.Chiba, J.Dobaczewski, N.Dubray, S.A.Giuliani, K.Hagino, D.Lacroix, Z.Li, P.Magierski, J.Maruhn, W.Nazarewicz, J.Pei, S.Peru, N.Pillet, J.Randrup, D.Regnier, P.G.Reinhard, L.M.Robledo, W.Ryssens, J.Sadhukhan, G.Scamps, N.Schunck, C.Simenel, J.Skalski, I.Stetcu, P.Stevenson, S.Umar, M.Verriere, D.Vretenar, M.Warda, S.Aberg Future of nuclear fission theory
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/abab4f
2020LO08 Phys.Rev. C 102, 024621 (2020) A.E.Lovell, P.Talou, I.Stetcu, K.J.Kelly Correlations between fission fragment and neutron anisotropies in neutron-induced fission NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235,238U, 239Pu(n, F), E=0-20 MeV; calculated anisotropic angular distributions for fission-fragments, prompt neutrons only from fission, and all prompt neutrons as a function of incident energy, ratio between the neutron anisotropy and the fission-fragment anisotropy. Comparison between the Hauser-Feshbach Monte Carlo calculations using CGMF code, and preliminary experimental data from the Chi-Nu liquid scintillator array at LANL.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024621
2020ST01 Nucl.Data Sheets 163, 261 (2020) I.Stetcu, M.B.Chadwick, T.Kawano, P.Talou, R.Capote, A.Trkov Evaluation of the Prompt Fission Gamma Properties for Neutron Induced Fission of 235, 238U and 239Pu NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235,238U, 239Pu(n, F), E<20 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced prompt fission γ-ray emission properties.
doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2019.12.007
2019BU15 Phys.Rev. C 100, 014615 (2019) Unitary evolution with fluctuations and dissipation RADIOACTIVITY 258Fm(SF); calculated fission fragment mass yield distribution, total kinetic energy (TKE) distribution. 240Pu(SF); calculated fission trajectory in the quadrupole-octupole (Q20-Q30) plane. Quantum hydrodynamics equations using time dependent density functional theory with and without dissipation and fluctuation of collective degrees of freedom. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014615
2019BU20 Phys.Rev. C 100, 034615 (2019) A.Bulgac, S.Jin, K.J.Roche, N.Schunck, I.Stetcu Fission dynamics of 240Pu from saddle to scission and beyond NUCLEAR REACTIONS 239Pu(n, F), E=thermal, 2, 4, 5.5 MeV; calculated fission pathway for 240Pu along the mass quadrupole moment Q20 using SeaLL1, SkM*, and UNEDF1 energy density functionals (EDFs), contours of neutron and proton densities, magnitudes and phases of neutron and proton pairing fields, snapshots of the induced fission of 240Pu with enhanced pairing strength, fission trajectories using SeaLL1 and SkM* EDFs, initial excitation energy, TKE, neutron and proton numbers, excitation energies of the heavy and light fission fragments (FFs), total excitation energy of FFs, average saddle-to-scission times, internal temperatures for the light and heavy FFs, average neutron multiplicity emitted by FFs as a function of incident neutron energy, time evolution of quadrupole Q20 and octupole Q30 moments of the light and heavy FFs before and after scission, number of neutrons emitted predominantly after scission; deduced minor effect of pairing strength on the fission dynamics. Calculations based on time-dependent superfluid local density approximation (TDSLDA), with no limit on pairing . Comparison with experimental data for average neutron multiplicities.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.034615
2019LO14 Phys.Rev. C 100, 054610 (2019) A.E.Lovell, I.Stetcu, P.Talou, G.Rusev, M.Jandel Prompt neutron multiplicity distributions inferred from γ-ray and fission fragment energy measurements RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); calculated total γ-ray energy as a function of total fragment kinetic energy (TKE) before and after neutron emission, and for events where the total number of prompt neutrons emitted is zero, two, and four, prompt neutron multiplicity distribution P(ν) using a novel method to extract the neutron multiplicity distribution from correlation plots of the total γ-ray energy and the total fission fragment kinetic energy (TKE), without measuring neutrons. Comparison with calculations using CGMF computer code. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E=thermal; calculated total γ-ray energy as a function of total fragment kinetic energy (TKE) using novel method to extract the neutron multiplicity distributions. Comparison with calculations using CGMF computer code.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054610
2019SC12 Phys.Rev. C 100, 014605 (2019) P.F.Schuster, M.J.Marcath, S.Marin, S.D.Clarke, M.Devlin, R.C.Haight, R.Vogt, P.Talou, I.Stetcu, T.Kawano, J.Randrup, S.A.Pozzi High resolution measurement of tagged two-neutron energy and angle correlations in 252Cf (sf) RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); measured prompt neutron time of flight, angular distribution of neutrons, nn-coin, prompt neutron emission anisotropy, correlations in angle and energy between prompt neutrons emitted in spontaneous fission using fission chamber and the Chi-Nu liquid scintillator detector array at LANSCE-LANL facility. Comparison with simulations produced by the fission event generators CGMF, FREYA, and MCNPX-POLIMI IPOL(1)=1.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014605
2018BR05 Nucl.Data Sheets 148, 1 (2018) D.A.Brown, M.B.Chadwick, R.Capote, A.C.Kahler, A.Trkov, M.W.Herman, A.A.Sonzogni, Y.Danon, A.D.Carlson, M.Dunn, D.L.Smith, G.M.Hale, G.Arbanas, R.Arcilla, C.R.Bates, B.Beck, B.Becker, F.Brown, R.J.Casperson, J.Conlin, D.E.Cullen, M.-A.Descalle, R.Firestone, T.Gaines, K.H.Guber, A.I.Hawari, J.Holmes, T.D.Johnson, T.Kawano, B.C.Kiedrowski, A.J.Koning, S.Kopecky, L.Leal, J.P.Lestone, C.Lubitz, J.I.Marquez Damian, C.M.Mattoon, E.A.McCutchan, S.Mughabghab, P.Navratil, D.Neudecker, G.P.A.Nobre, G.Noguere, M.Paris, M.T.Pigni, A.J.Plompen, B.Pritychenko, V.G.Pronyaev, D.Roubtsov, D.Rochman, P.Romano, P.Schillebeeckx, S.Simakov, M.Sin, I.Sirakov, B.Sleaford, V.Sobes, E.S.Soukhovitskii, I.Stetcu, P.Talou, I.Thompson, S.van der Marck, L.Welser-Sherrill, D.Wiarda, M.White, J.L.Wormald, R.Q.Wright, M.Zerkle, G.Zerovnik, Y.Zhu ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8 th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data COMPILATION Z=1-118; compiled, analyzed decay data, Maxwellian averaged neutron capture σ, neutron-induced fission σ. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1,2H, 3He, 6,7Li, 9Be, 10,11B, 12,13C, 14,15N, 16,17,18O, 19F, 20,21,22Ne, 22,23Na, 24,25,26Mg, 26,27Al, 28,29,30,31,32Si, 31P, 32,33,34,35,36S, 35,36,37Cl, 36,37,38,39,40,41Ar, 39,40,41K, 40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48Ca, 45Sc, 46,47,48,49,50Ti, 49,50,51V, 50,51,52,53,54Cr, 54,55Mn, 54,55,56,57,58Fe, 58,59Co, 58,59,60,61,62,63,64Ni, 63,64,65Cu, 64,65,66,67,68,69,70Zn, 69,70,71Ga, 70,71,72,73,74,75,76Ge, 73,74,75As, 74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82Se, 79,80,81Br, 78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86Kr, 85,86,87Rb, 84,85,86,87,88,89,90Sr, 89,90,91Y, 90,91,92,93,94,95,96Zr, 93,94,95Nb, 92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100Mo, 98,99Tc, 96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106Ru, 103,104,105Rh, 102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110Pd, 107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118Ag, 106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116Cd, 113,114,115In, 112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126Sn, 121,122,123,124,125,126Sb, 120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,121,132Te, 127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135I, 123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136Xe, 133,134,135,136,137Cs, 130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140Ba, 138,139,140La, 136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144Ce, 141,142,143Pr, 142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150Nd, 143,144,145,146,147,148,149,151Pm, 144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154Sm, 151,152,153,154,155,156,157Eu, 152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160Gd, 158,159,160,161Tb, 154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164Dy, 165,166Ho, 162,163,164,165,166,167,168,170,170Er, 168,169,170,171Tm, 168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176Yb, 175,176Lu, 174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182Hf, 180,181,182Ta, 180,181,182,183,184,185,186W, 185,186,187Re, 184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192Os, 191,192,193Ir, 190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198Pt, 197Au, 196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204Hg, 203,204,205Tl, 204,205,206,207,208,209,210Pb, 209,210Bi, 208,209,210Po, 223,224,225,226Ra, 225,226,227Ac, 227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234Th, 229,230,231,232,233Pa, 230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241U, 234,235,236,237,238,239Np, 236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246Pu, 240,241,242,243,244Am, 240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250Cm, 245,246,247,248,249,250Bk, 246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254Cf, 251,252,253,254,255Es, 255Fm(n, γ), E=30 keV; calculated Maxwellian-averaged σ using ENDF/B-VIII.0 evaluated neutron library. Comparison with ENDF/B-VII.1 and KADONIS values. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234Th, 229,230,231,232,233Pa, 230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241U, 234,235,236,237,238,239Np, 236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246Pu, 240,241,242,243,244Am, 240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250Cm, 245,246,247,248,249,250Bk, 246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254Cf, 251,252,253,254,255Es, 255Fm(n, γ), (n, F), E=thermal; calculated thermal σ. Comparison with ENDF/B-VII.1, JENDL-4.0u+ and Atlas of Neutron Resonances values.
doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001
2018CA08 Nucl.Data Sheets 148, 254 (2018) R.Capote, A.Trkov, M.Sin, M.T.Pigni, V.G.Pronyaev, J.Balibrea, D.Bernard, D.Cano-Ott, Y.Danon, A.Daskalakis, T.Goricanec, M.W.Herman, B.Kiedrowski, S.Kopecky, E.Mendoza, D.Neudecker, L.Leal, G.Noguere, P.Schillebeeckx, I.Sirakov, E.S.Soukhovitskii, I.Stetcu, P.Talou IAEA CIELO Evaluation of Neutron-induced Reactions on 235U and 238U Targets NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235,238U(n, X), E<20 MeV; analyzed available data; calculated σ, σ(θ), σ(θ, E).
doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.005
2018CH34 Phys.Lett. B 782, 652 (2018) A.Chyzh, P.Jaffke, C.Y.Wu, R.A.Henderson, P.Talou, I.Stetcu, J.Henderson, M.Q.Buckner, S.A.Sheets, R.Hughes, B.Wang, J.L.Ullmann, S.Mosby, T.A.Bredeweg, A.C.Hayes-Sterbenz, J.M.O'Donnell Dependence of the prompt fission γ-ray spectrum on the entrance channel of compound nucleus: Spontaneous vs. neutron-induced fission RADIOACTIVITY 240,242Pu(SF); measured decay products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced prompt γ-ray spectra. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 239,241Pu(n, F), E ∼ 100 keV; measured reaction products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced prompt fission γ-ray energy spectra. Comparison with Monte Carlo Hauser-Feshbach statistical model for the neutron-induced fission.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.06.006
2018GR08 Acta Phys.Pol. B49, 591 (2018) J.Grineviciute, P.Magierski, A.Bulgac, S.Jin, I.Stetcu Accuracy of Fission Dynamics Within the Time-dependent Superfluid Local Density Approximation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 240Pu; calculated fission time evolution (energy and quadrupole moment vs time) using Time-Dependent Superfluid Local Density Approximation (TDSLDA).
doi: 10.5506/aphyspolb.49.591
2018MA25 Phys.Rev. C 97, 044622 (2018) M.J.Marcath, R.C.Haight, R.Vogt, M.Devlin, P.Talou, I.Stetcu, J.Randrup, P.F.Schuster, S.D.Clarke, S.A.Pozzi Measured and simulated 252Cf(sf) prompt neutron-photon competition RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); measured Eγ, Iγ, E(n), I(n), nγ-coin, time of flight distributions for neutrons and photons, event-by-event neutron-photon correlation using Chi-Nu liquid scintillator array of 45 liquid organic scintillation detectors and a fission chamber at LANL; deduced neutron and photon multiplicities. Comparison with MCPNX-PoliMi simulation with CGMF and FREYA models.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044622
2018TA05 Eur.Phys.J. A 54, 9 (2018) P.Talou, R.Vogt, J.Randrup, M.E.Rising, S.A.Pozzi, J.Verbeke, M.T.Andrews, S.D.Clarke, P.Jaffke, M.Jandel, T.Kawano, M.J.Marcath, K.Meierbachtol, L.Nakae, G.Rusev, A.Sood, I.Stetcu, C.Walker Correlated prompt fission data in transport simulations COMPILATION 235U, 239Pu(n, F), E=thermal;252Cf(SF); compiled average prompt fission neutron multiplicity vs fragment mass, prompt fission neutron σ(En), γ-decay energy spectrum σ(Eγ), γ multiplicity, n-n angular correlation. Calculated σ, yields using FREYA and CGMF codes. Compared with data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2018-12455-0
2016BU04 Phys.Rev.Lett. 116, 122504 (2016) A.Bulgac, P.Magierski, K.J.Roche, I.Stetcu Induced Fission of 240Pu within a Real-Time Microscopic Framework RADIOACTIVITY 240Pu(SF) [from 239Pu(n, X)240Pu, E low]; calculated fissioning dynamics parameters, fission fragments properties, negligible role the collective inertia in the fully nonadiabatic treatment of nuclear dynamics, where all collective degrees of freedom (CDOF) are included.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.122504
2016TA24 Phys.Rev. C 94, 064613 (2016) P.Talou, T.Kawano, I.Stetcu, J.P.Lestone, E.McKigney, M.B.Chadwick Late-time emission of prompt fission γ rays NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U, 239Pu(n, F), E=thermal; 252Cf(SF); calculated average prompt fission γ-ray spectrum, average prompt γ-ray multiplicity as a function of time, energy spectra of late fission γ rays emitted in the 10 ns to 2 μs time window following fission, cumulative average prompt total γ-ray energy and multiplicity as a function of time, pre-neutron-emission fission fragment mass yields. Hauser-Feshbach formalism using the Monte Carlo Hauser-Feshbach code CGMF. Comparison with experimental data. 134Te; γ-ray spectrum for 162-ns isomer decay in the 10-100 ns coincidence window gated on the post-neutron-emission 134Te fission fragment. RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); see keywords above for Nuclear Reactions
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.064613
2015JA07 Eur.Phys.J. A 51, 179 (2015) M.Jandel, B.Baramsai, E.Bond, G.Rusev, C.Walker, T.A.Bredeweg, M.B.Chadwick, A.Couture, M.M.Fowler, A.Hayes, T.Kawano, S.Mosby, I.Stetcu, T.N.Taddeucci, P.Talou, J.L.Ullmann, D.J.Vieira, J.B.Wilhelmy Capture and fission with DANCE and NEUANCE
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2015-15179-7
2015ST01 Phys.Rev.Lett. 114, 012701 (2015) I.Stetcu, C.A.Bertulani, A.Bulgac, P.Magierski, K.J.Roche Relativistic Coulomb Excitation within the Time Dependent Superfluid Local Density Approximation NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(238U, 238U'), E not given; calculated the total energy spectrum of emitted electromagnetic radiation, damping resonance width. Goldhaber-Teller model.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.012701
2015ST04 Acta Phys.Pol. B46, 391 (2015) Nuclear Structure and Dynamics with Density Functional Theory NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(U, X), E not given; calculated Coulomb excitation parameters for relativistic v=0.7c projectiles.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.46.391
2014ST13 Nucl.Data Sheets 118, 230 (2014) I.Stetcu, P.Talou, T.Kawano, M.Jandel Angular Momentum Distribution of Fission Fragments NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E=thermal; calculated prompt γ multiplicity distribution. 83Se, 90Rb, 119,121,123Cd, 123,125In, 127,128Sn, 130Sb, 131,133Te, 135Xe, 138Cs calculated isomeric ratios (isomeric yield ratios); deduced parameters.
doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.044
2014ST17 Phys.Rev. C 90, 024617 (2014) I.Stetcu, P.Talou, T.Kawano, M.Jandel Properties of prompt-fission γ rays NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U, 239Pu(n, F), E=thermal; 235U(n, F), E=5.5 MeV; calculated prompt γ and neutron average energy and multiplicity as function of fragment mass, prompt γ multiplicity distributions, β and p parameters, prompt γ-ray energy spectrum. Monte Carlo Hauser-Feshbach (MCHF) approach. Comparison with experimental data. RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); calculated average prompt γ spectrum and multiplicity as a function of fragment mass, prompt γ multiplicity distribution. Monte Carlo Hauser-Feshbach (MCHF) approach. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.024617
2014TA15 Nucl.Data Sheets 118, 195 (2014) Prompt Fission Neutrons and γ Rays RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); calculated prompt fission multiplicity, neutron multiplicity vs fission fragment mass, γ-ray multiplicity, γ energy spectrum using Monte Carlo approach to statistical HF theory. Compared to data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.035
2014TA16 Nucl.Data Sheets 118, 227 (2014) P.Talou, T.Kawano, I.Stetcu, R.Vogt, J.Randrup Monte Carlo Predictions of Prompt Fission Neutrons and Photons: a Code Comparison RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); calculated neutron, γ average kinetic energy, neutron multiplicity, γ multiplicity from different fission fragments. Compared with
doi: 10.1016/j.nds.2014.04.043
2013BE02 Phys.Rev. C 87, 014617 (2013) B.Becker, P.Talou, T.Kawano, Y.Danon, I.Stetcu Monte Carlo Hauser-Feshbach predictions of prompt fission γ rays: Application to nth+235U, nth+239Pu, and 252Cf(sf) NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U, 239Pu(n, F), E=thermal; calculated ratio of neutron emission for light and heavy fragments as function of heavy fragment mass, neutron emission probability as function of excitation energy and different spin values of 146Ba, average initial fragment spin and energy, average and total neutron multiplicity, average prompt fission neutron spectrum, average center-of-mass energy of prompt fission neutrons, average Eγ and γ multiplicity, prompt fission γ spectrum and multiplicity. Monte Carlo Hauser-Feshbach model. Comparison with experimental data, and with other model calculations. RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); calculated average center-of-mass energy of prompt fission neutrons, average prompt fission neutron and γ spectra, average Eγ, and multiplicity, total Eγ, average prompt fission γ multiplicity, γ multiplicity distribution. Monte Carlo Hauser-Feshbach model. Comparison with experimental data, and with other model calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.014617
2013KA29 Nucl.Phys. A913, 51 (2013) T.Kawano, P.Talou, I.Stetcu, M.B.Chadwick Statistical and evaporation models for the neutron emission energy spectrum in the center-of-mass system from fission fragments NUCLEAR REACTIONS 93Nb(n, n'), E=14 MeV;138Xe(n, n'), E*=15 MeV; calculated σ(En). 235,238U(n, F), E=thermal; calculated fission fragments distribution of E*, prompt σ(En) from light and heavy fission fragments. Haser-Feshbach CGM code. Compared with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.05.020
2013ST01 Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 69, 182 (2013) Effective interactions and operators in the no-core shell model
doi: 10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.10.001
2013ST23 Phys.Rev. C 88, 044603 (2013) I.Stetcu, P.Talou, T.Kawano, M.Jandel Isomer production ratios and the angular momentum distribution of fission fragments NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E=thermal; calculated prompt γ multiplicity distribution, prompt γ-ray spectrum for different values of α parameter; 235U(n, F)83Se/90Rb/119Cd/123Cd/123In/125In/127Sn/128Sn/130Sb/131Te/133Te/135Xe/138Cs, E=thermal; calculated isomer production ratios as function of initial angular momentum of the fission fragments, initial spin distributions; compared with experimental data obtained from DANCE facility at LANSCE. 235U(n, F)69Zn/71Zn/71Ge/73Ge/75Ge/77Ge/77Se/79Se/81Se/83Se/85Sr/90Br/99Nb/109Pd/115Cd/121Sn/123Sn/125Sn/127Sn/131Te/133Xe/135Xe/137Ce/139Ce/138Cs/197Hg, E=thermal; calculated isomer production ratios; deduced dependence of isomer ratios on low-lying discrete spectra of fragments; compared with available experimental data in literature. Monte-Carlo method of Hauser-Feshbach formalism for deexcitation of primary fragments after scission using GGMF computer code.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.044603
2013UL01 Phys.Rev. C 87, 044607 (2013) J.L.Ullmann, E.M.Bond, T.A.Bredeweg, A.Couture, R.C.Haight, M.Jandel, T.Kawano, H.Y.Lee, J.M.O'Donnell, A.C.Hayes, I.Stetcu, T.N.Taddeucci, P.Talou, D.J.Vieira, J.B.Wilhelmy, J.A.Becker, A.Chyzh, J.Gostic, R.Henderson, E.Kwan, C.Y.Wu Prompt γ-ray production in neutron-induced fission of 239Pu NUCLEAR REACTIONS 239Pu(n, F), E<30 keV; measured prompt Eγ, Iγ, fission σ(E), Gamma-ray multiplicity using DANCE γ-ray calorimeter at LANSCE facility; deduced average multiplicity, average total energy. GEANT4 simulation of DANCE detector. Fission Tagging. Comparison with Monte Carlo Hauser-Feshbach (MCHF) calculations, previous experimental studies, and with ENDF/B-VII.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.044607
2012RO07 Phys.Rev. C 85, 034003 (2012); Pub.Note Phys.Rev. C 85, 039903 (2012) J.Rotureau, I.Stetcu, B.R.Barrett, U.van Kolck Two and three nucleons in a trap, and the continuum limit
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.034003
2011BA53 J.Phys.:Conf.Ser. 312, 092016 (2011) B.Barrett, M.Kruse, A.Lisetskiy, P.Navratil, I.Stetcu, J.Vary Ab initio shell model with a core: Extending the No Core Shell Model to heavier nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 7Li; calculated ground state energy. 8,9,10He; calculated levels, J, π. 6Li; calculated quadrupole moment. SSM (standard shell model), NCSM (No Core Shell Model).
doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/312/9/092016
2011DE34 Phys.Rev. C 84, 065501 (2011) J.de Vries, R.Higa, C.-P.Liu, E.Mereghetti, I.Stetcu, R.G.E.Timmermans, U.van Kolck Electric dipole moments of light nuclei from chiral effective field theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 2,3H, 3He; calculated electric dipole moments by systematic expansion provided by chiral effective field theory (EFT) taking into account parity and time reversal violation.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.065501
2011ST24 Phys.Rev. C 84, 051309 (2011) I.Stetcu, A.Bulgac, P.Magierski, K.J.Roche Isovector giant dipole resonance from the 3D time-dependent density functional theory for superfluid nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 172Yb, 188Os, 238U(γ, n); calculated time-dependent proton and neutron occupation probabilities, photo-absorption cross sections for isovector giant dipole resonances. Fully symmetry-unrestricted time-dependent density functional theory for two Skyrme force parametrizations SkP and SLy4. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.051309
2009JO04 Phys.Rev. C 80, 024320 (2009) Collapse of the random-phase approximation: Examples and counter-examples from the shell model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 12C, 28Si, 32S; calculated ground-state energy, low-lying random phase approximation (RPA) frequencies of spherical and deformed states using shell model, Hartree-Fock (HF) and HF+RPA models.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.024320
2009LI31 Phys.Rev. C 80, 024315 (2009) A.F.Lisetskiy, M.K.G.Kruse, B.R.Barrett, P.Navratil, I.Stetcu, J.P.Vary Effective operators from exact many-body renormalization NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 6Li; calculated levels, J, π, reduced two-body matrix elements, E2 reduced matrix elements and quadrupole moments using ab initio no-core shell model (NCSM) approach. 7,9Li; calculated absolute quadrupole moments and E2 transition matrix elements. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.80.024315
2009NA13 J.Phys.(London) G36, 083101 (2009) P.Navratil, S.Quaglioni, I.Stetcu, B.R.Barrett Recent developments in no-core shell-model calculations NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H, 4,6,8He, 6,7,8,9,10,11Li, 11Be, 7,8,9,10,11B, 12,13C, 16O;calculated rms radii, level energies, J, π, B(E1), quadrupole and magnetic moments. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 7Be(p, γ), 3He, 3H(α, γ), E ≤ 1.5, 2.5 MeV; calculated S-factor, NCSM overlap functions.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/36/8/083101
2009ST11 Phys.Rev. C 79, 064001 (2009) I.Stetcu, S.Quaglioni, J.L.Friar, A.C.Hayes, P.Navratil Electric dipole polarizabilities of hydrogen and helium isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H, He, 4He; calculated electric dipole polarizability using the Schrodinger equation. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064001
2008LI44 Phys.Rev. C 78, 044302 (2008) A.F.Lisetskiy, B.R.Barrett, M.K.G.Kruse, P.Navratil, I.Stetcu, J.P.Vary Ab-initio shell model with a core NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 6,7Li, 8,9,10He; calculated excitation energies, J, π. Ab-initio no-core shell model calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.044302
2008ST14 Phys.Lett. B 665, 168 (2008) I.Stetcu, C.-P.Liu, J.L.Friar, A.C.Hayes, P.Navratil Nuclear electric dipole moment of 3He NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3He; calculated electric dipole moment.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.06.019
2007QU02 Nucl.Phys. A790, 372c (2007) S.Quaglioni, I.Stetcu, S.Bacca, B.R.Barrett, C.W.Johnson, P.Navratil, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Benchmark calculation of inclusive responses in the four-body nuclear system NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He; calculated quadrupole response function. No-core shell model, effective interaction hyperspherical harmonic approach.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.03.068
2007ST05 Nucl.Phys. A785, 307 (2007) I.Stetcu, S.Quaglioni, S.Bacca, B.R.Barrett, C.W.Johnson, P.Navratil, N.Barnea, W.Leidemann, G.Orlandini Benchmark calculation of inclusive electromagnetic responses in the four-body nuclear system NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He; calculated ground-state energy, quadrupole and dipole response functions. No-core shell model, effective interaction hyperspherical harmonic approaches.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.12.047
2006ST06 Phys.Rev. C 73, 037307 (2006) I.Stetcu, B.R.Barrett, P.Navratil, J.P.Vary Long- and short-range correlations in the ab-initio no-core shell model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He, 12C; calculated longitudinal-longitudinal distribution functions, effective operators. No-core shell model, two-body cluster approximation.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.037307
2005JO05 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E14, 57 (2005) Shortcuts to nuclear structure: Lessons in Hartree-Fock, RPA, and the no-core shell model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 12C; calculated ground-state energy. No-core shell model.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301305002771
2005ST11 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E14, 95 (2005) I.Stetcu, B.R.Barrett, P.Navratil, C.W.Johnson Electromagnetic transitions with effective operators NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 2H, 6Li; calculated transitions B(E2), B(M1). Effective operators.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301305002813
2005ST14 Phys.Rev. C 71, 044325 (2005) I.Stetcu, B.R.Barrett, P.Navratil, J.P.Vary Effective operators within the ab initio no-core shell model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He, 6Li, 12C; calculated wave functions, transitions B(M1), B(E2). Effective operator formalism, no-core shell model.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.71.044325
2005ST35 Eur.Phys.J. A 25, Supplement 1, 489 (2005) I.Stetcu, B.R.Barrett, P.Navratil, J.P.Vary Effective operators in the NCSM formalism NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 12C; calculated B(E2). No-core shell model.
doi: 10.1140/epjad/i2005-06-074-4
2005VA32 Eur.Phys.J. A 25, Supplement 1, 475 (2005) J.P.Vary, O.V.Atramentov, B.R.Barrett, M.Hasan, A.C.Hayes, R.Lloyd, A.I.Mazur, P.Navratil, A.G.Negoita, A.Nogga, W.E.Ormand, S.Popescu, B.Shehadeh, A.M.Shirokov, J.R.Spence, I.Stetcu, S.Stoica, T.A.Weber, S.A.Zaytsev Ab initio No-Core Shell Model -- Recent results and future prospects NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He; calculated radius. 6Li, 16O, 48Ar, 48K, 48Ca, 48Sc, 48Ti, 48V, 48Cr, 48Mn; calculated ground-state energies. 16O, 47Ca; calculated excited states energies. No-core shell model.
doi: 10.1140/epjad/i2005-06-214-x
2004ST04 Phys.Rev. C 69, 024311 (2004) Gamow-Teller transitions and deformation in the proton-neutron random phase approximation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 20,21,22,24Ne, 24,25Na, 24,26Mg, 26,27,29Al, 28,30Si, 32,34S, 36Ar, 44,46Ti; calculated Gamow-Teller transition strengths. Proton-neutron RPA.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.69.024311
2003ST04 Phys.Rev. C 67, 044315 (2003) Tests of the random phase approximation for transition strengths NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 20,21,22Ne, 22,24Na, 24,25Mg, 28,29Si, 36Ar, 44Ti, 46V; calculated transition strength distributions. Comparison of RPA and shell model results.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.67.044315
2002JO15 Phys.Rev. C66, 034312 (2002) C.W.Johnson, I.Stetcu, J.P.Draayer SU(3) versus Deformed Hartree-Fock State NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 20Ne, 24Mg, 32S, 36Ar, 44Ti; calculated ground-state energies, deformation parameters. Comparison of Hartree-Fock and SU(3) models.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.66.034312
2002JO21 Phys.Rev. C 66, 064304 (2002) Scalar ground-state observables in the random phase approximation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 20,22,24O, 19,20,21F, 20,21,22Ne, 22,23Na, 24,25,26Mg, 26Al, 28Si, 44,46Ti, 46V, 48Cr; calculated expectation values for pairing, spin, other observables. RPA, quasiboson approximation. Comparison with mean-field results.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.66.064304
2002ST29 Phys.Rev. C66, 034301 (2002) Random Phase Approximation vs Exact Shell-Model Correlation Energies NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 19,20,21,22,23,24O, 19,20,21,22,23,27F, 20,21,22,23,24,28Ne, 22,23,24,25,29Na, 24,25,26,27Mg, 26,27,28Al, 28,29Si, 30,31,32,33,34P, 27,32,33,34S, 34,35Cl, 36,37Ar, 36K, 44,45,46,47,48,49,50Ca, 43,44,45,46,47Sc, 44,45,46,47Ti, 46V, 48Cr; calculated binding energies, correlation energies. Comparison of RPA and exact shell-model results.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.66.034301
2001AV03 Nucl.Phys. A693, 616 (2001) M.Avrigeanu, A.N.Antonov, H.Lenske, I.Stetcu Effective Interactions for Multistep Processes NUCLEAR REACTIONS 93Nb, 90Zr(p, p), E ≈ 22 MeV; 90Zr(p, n), E=25.6 MeV; 94,95,96,97,98,100Mo(p, xn), E=25.6 MeV; calculated σ(E, θ). Effective interactions, multistep direct processes, comparisons with data.
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00810-7
2000AV05 Trans.Bulg.Nucl.Soc. 5, 3 (2000) M.Avrigeanu, I.Stetcu, V.Avrigeanu Realistic Effective NN Interactions for Multistep Direct Reactions to the Continuum NUCLEAR REACTIONS 90Zr, 93Nb, 96,98,100Mo(n, n), E=17-26 MeV; 90Zr, 93Nb(p, p), E=22 MeV; calculated σ(θ). 90Zr(p, n), E=25.6 MeV; 94,95,96,97,98,100Mo(p, xn), E=25.6 MeV; calculated σ(E, θ). Multistep direct reaction theory, several effective interactions compared. Comparisons with data.
1998HA33 Phys.Rev. C58, 295 (1998) A.Harangozo, I.Stetcu, M.Avrigeanu, V.Avrigeanu Particle-Hole State Densities with Nonequidistant Single-Particle Levels
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.58.295
1998ST34 Roum.J.Phys. 43, 529 (1998) Quantum-Mechanical Analysis of Single Particle Level Density NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 40Ca, 56Fe; calculated single-particle level densities. Quantum-mechanical Green's function approach, comparison with Thomas-Fermi approximation.
Back to query form |