NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 24, 2024. Search: Author = A.Schwenk Found 172 matches. Showing 1 to 100. [Next]2024CO02 Phys.Rev. C 109, 024311 (2024) M.Companys Franzke, A.Tichai, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk Eigenvector continuation for the pairing Hamiltonian
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.109.024311
2024LI22 Phys.Rev. C 109, 035801 (2024) Symmetry energy and neutron star properties constrained by chiral effective field theory calculations
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.109.035801
2024SO07 Phys.Rev. C 109, 034005 (2024) R.Somasundaram, J.E.Lynn, L.Huth, A.Schwenk, I.Tews Maximally local two-nucleon interactions at N3LO in Δ-less chiral effective field theory
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.109.034005
2024ZU01 Phys.Rev. C 109, 014319 (2024) L.Zurek, S.K.Bogner, R.J.Furnstahl, R.Navarro Perez, N.Schunck, A.Schwenk Optimized nuclear energy density functionals including long-range pion contributions
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.109.014319
2023FE08 Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022044 (2023) R.W.Fearick, P.von Neumann-Cosel, S.Bacca, J.Birkhan, F.Bonaiti, I.Brandherm, G.Hagen, H.Matsubara, W.Nazarewicz, N.Pietralla, V.Yu.Ponomarev, P.-G.Reinhard, X.Roca-Maza, A.Richter, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis, and A.Tamii Electric dipole polarizability of 40Ca NUCLEAR REACTIONS 40Ca(p, p'), E=5-25 MeV; measured reaction products, Ep, Ip; deduced electric dipole strength distribution, σ(θ, E). Comparison with available data. The Grand Raiden spectrometer, RCNP, Osaka.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.L022044
2023HE04 Phys.Rev. C 107, 024310 (2023) K.Hebeler, V.Durant, J.Hoppe, M.Heinz, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis, A.Tichai Normal ordering of three-nucleon interactions for ab initio calculations of heavy nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 18O, 48Ca, 78Ni, 132Sn, 208Pb; calculated ground-state energies. 132Sn, 208Pb; calculated charge radii. Jacobi normal-ordering (NO) framework to include three-nucleon (3N) interactions in ab initio many-body calculations up to heavy nuclei at the two-body operator level. Comparison to experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.024310
2023JO02 Phys.Lett. B 838, 137689 (2023) L.Jokiniemi, B.Romeo, C.Brase, J.Kotila, P.Soriano, A.Schwenk, J.Menendez Two-neutrino ββ decay of 136Xe to the first excited 0+ state in 136Ba RADIOACTIVITY 136Xe(2β-); calculated nuclear matrix element for the two-neutrino ββ decay of 136Xe into the first excited state of 136Ba using the quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA) framework, the nuclear shell model, the interacting boson model (IBM-2), and an effective field theory (EFT) for β and ββ decays; deduced T1/2.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137689
2023KE02 Phys.Rev.Lett. 130, 072701 (2023) J.Keller, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk Nuclear Equation of State for Arbitrary Proton Fraction and Temperature Based on Chiral Effective Field Theory and a Gaussian Process Emulator
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.072701
2023NI07 Phys.Rev.Lett. 131, 022502 (2023) L.Nies, D.Atanasov, M.Athanasakis-Kaklamanakis, M.Au, K.Blaum, J.Dobaczewski, B.S.Hu, J.D.Holt, J.Karthein, I.Kulikov, Y.A.Litvinov, D.Lunney, V.Manea, T.Miyagi, M.Mougeot, L.Schweikhard, A.Schwenk, K.Sieja, F.Wienholtz Isomeric Excitation Energy for 99Inm from Mass Spectrometry Reveals Constant Trend Next to Doubly Magic 100Sn ATOMIC MASSES 99,100,101In; measured TOF; deduced mass excess, excitation energies. The ISOLTRAP mass spectrometer at ISOLDE/CERN. RADIOACTIVITY 99In(IT); measured decay products; deduced excitation energy with small uncertainty, intriguing constancy of the isomer excitation energies in neutron-deficient indium that persists down to the N=50 shell closure, even when all neutrons are removed from the valence shell. Comparison with large-scale shell model, ab initio, and density functional theory calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.022502
2023SE18 Phys.Rev. C 108, 054005 (2023) R.Seutin, O.J.Hernandez, T.Miyagi, S.Bacca, K.Hebeler, S.Konig, A.Schwenk Magnetic dipole operator from chiral effective field theory for many-body expansion methods
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.054005
2022BR11 Phys.Rev. C 106, 034309 (2022) C.Brase, J.Menendez, E.A.Coello Perez, A.Schwenk Neutrinoless double-β decay from an effective field theory for heavy nuclei RADIOACTIVITY 48Ca, 70Zn, 76Ge, 80,82Se, 96Zr, 100Mo, 104Ru, 110Pd, 114,116Cd, 128,130Te, 136Xe, 150Nd(2β-); 64Zn, 106,108Cd, 112Sn, 124Xe(2β+), (2EC); calculated double-Gamow-Teller (DGT) nuclear matrix elements (NMEs) in the EFT for different combinations of neutron and proton orbitals, correlation between DGT and NMEs for 0νββ decay mode, nuclear matrix elements (NMEs) for 0νββ decays using effective field theory (EFT) with a spherical core coupled to additional neutrons and/or protons in the adjacent nuclei; compiled experimental structure data from the ENSDF database for parent nuclei as well as relevant adjacent nuclei and nuclei one neutron and proton away from the parent and double-beta decay daughter nuclei: 47Ca, 47,49Sc, 49Ti, 63Ni, 63,65Cu, 65,69Zn, 69,71Ga, 71,75Ge, 75,77As, 77,79,81Se, 79,81,83Br, 81,83Kr, 99Mo, 99,101Tc, 101,103Ru, 103,105Rh, 105,107,109Pd, 105,107,109,111Ag, 107,109,111,113Cd, 111,113,115In, 113,115Sn, 123,127,129Te, 123,125,127,129,131I, 125,129,131Xe, 135,137Cs, 137Ba, 149,151Pm, 151Sm. Comparison with results from different models: nuclear shell model (NSM), interacting boson model (IBM), effective field theory (EDF), quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA), ab initio using multireference in-medium similarity renormalization group (MR-IMSRG), valence space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG), and coupled-cluster (CC).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.034309
2022DI03 Phys.Rev. C 105, 064002 (2022) S.Dietz, H.-W.Hammer, S.Konig, A.Schwenk Three-body resonances in pionless effective field theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3NN; calculated hypothetical energy levels, J, π, resonances. Calculations using pionless effective field theory at leading order with Fadeev equations and complemented by finite volume method. Comparison to other calculations obtained in different approaches. Existence of low-energy resonance not confirmed.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.064002
2022HO06 Phys.Rev. C 105, 034324 (2022) J.Hoppe, A.Tichai, M.Heinz, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk Importance truncation for the in-medium similarity renormalization group NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He, 40,48,52,60Ca, 56,68,78Ni; calculated ground state energy. Importance truncation (IT) methods in the nonperturbative in-medium similarity renormalization group (IMSRG) approach. Investigated the effect of truncation in different sub-blocks of the two-body Hamiltonian on the solution error.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.034324
2022MA04 Phys.Rev.Lett. 128, 022502 (2022) S.Malbrunot-Ettenauer, S.Kaufmann, S.Bacca, C.Barbieri, J.Billowes, M.L.Bissell, K.Blaum, B.Cheal, T.Duguet, R.F.Garcia Ruiz, W.Gins, C.Gorges, G.Hagen, H.Heylen, J.D.Holt, G.R.Jansen, A.Kanellakopoulos, M.Kortelainen, T.Miyagi, P.Navratil, W.Nazarewicz, R.Neugart, G.Neyens, W.Nortershauser, S.J.Novario, T.Papenbrock, T.Ratajczyk, P.-G.Reinhard, L.V.Rodriguez, R.Sanchez, S.Sailer, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis, V.Soma, S.R.Stroberg, L.Wehner, C.Wraith, L.Xie, Z.Y.Xu, X.F.Yang, D.T.Yordanov Nuclear Charge Radii of the Nickel Isotopes 58-68, 70Ni NUCLEAR MOMENTS 58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68Ni, 70Ni; measured frequency-time spectrum; deduced isotope shifts, mean-square charge radii. Comparison with ab initio approaches. Collinear laser spectroscopy beam line COLLAPS, ISOLDE/CERN.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.022502
2022SC17 J.Phys.(London) G49, 110502 (2022) H.Schatz, A.D.Becerril Reyes, A.Best, E.F.Brown, K.Chatziioannou, K.A.Chipps, C.M.Deibel, R.Ezzeddine, D.K.Galloway, C.J.Hansen, F.Herwig, A.P.Ji, M.Lugaro, Z.Meisel, D.Norman, J.S.Read, L.F.Roberts, A.Spyrou, I.Tews, F.X.Timmes, C.Travaglio, N.Vassh, C.Abia, P.Adsley, S.Agarwal, M.Aliotta, W.Aoki, A.Arcones, A.Aryan, A.Bandyopadhyay, A.Banu, D.W.Bardayan, J.Barnes, A.Bauswein, T.C.Beers, J.Bishop, T.Boztepe, B.Cote, M.E.Caplan, A.E.Champagne, J.A.Clark, M.Couder, A.Couture, S.E.de Mink, S.Debnath, R.J.deBoer, J.den Hartogh, P.Denissenkov, V.Dexheimer, I.Dillmann, J.E.Escher, M.A.Famiano, R.Farmer, R.Fisher, C.Frohlich, A.Frebel, C.Fryer, G.Fuller, A.K.Ganguly, S.Ghosh, B.K.Gibson, T.Gorda, K.N.Gourgouliatos, V.Graber, M.Gupta, W.C.Haxton, A.Heger, W.R.Hix, W.C.G.Ho, E.M.Holmbeck, A.A.Hood, S.Huth, G.Imbriani, R.G.Izzard, R.Jain, H.Jayatissa, Z.Johnston, T.Kajino, A.Kankainen, G.G.Kiss, A.Kwiatkowski, M.La Cognata, A.M.Laird, L.Lamia, P.Landry, E.Laplace, K.D.Launey, D.Leahy, G.Leckenby, A.Lennarz, B.Longfellow, A.E.Lovell, W.G.Lynch, S.M.Lyons, K.Maeda, E.Masha, C.Matei, J.Merc, B.Messer, F.Montes, A.Mukherjee, M.R.Mumpower, D.Neto, B.Nevins, W.G.Newton, L.Q.Nguyen, K.Nishikawa, N.Nishimura, F.M.Nunes, E.O'Connor, B.W.O'Shea, W.-J.Ong, S.D.Pain, M.A.Pajkos, M.Pignatari, R.G.Pizzone, V.M.Placco, T.Plewa, B.Pritychenko, A.Psaltis, D.Puentes, Y.-Z.Qian, D.Radice, D.Rapagnani, B.M.Rebeiro, R.Reifarth, A.L.Richard, N.Rijal, I.U.Roederer, J.S.Rojo, J.S K, Y.Saito, A.Schwenk, M.L.Sergi, R.S.Sidhu, A.Simon, T.Sivarani, A.Skuladottir, M.S.Smith, A.Spiridon, T.M.Sprouse, S.Starrfield, A.W.Steiner, F.Strieder, I.Sultana, R.Surman, T.Szucs, A.Tawfik, F.Thielemann, L.Trache, R.Trappitsch, M.B.Tsang, A.Tumino, S.Upadhyayula, J.O.Valle Martinez, M.Van der Swaelmen, C.Viscasillas Vazquez, A.Watts, B.Wehmeyer, M.Wiescher, C.Wrede, J.Yoon, R.G.T.Zegers, M.A.Zermane, M.Zingale, the Horizon 2020 Collaborations Horizons: nuclear astrophysics in the 2020s and beyond
doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ac8890
2022SO14 Phys.Rev.Lett. 129, 132501 (2022) F.Sommer, K.Konig, D.M.Rossi, N.Everett, D.Garand, R.P.de Groote, J.D.Holt, P.Imgram, A.Incorvati, C.Kalman, A.Klose, J.Lantis, Y.Liu, A.J.Miller, K.Minamisono, T.Miyagi, W.Nazarewicz, W.Nortershauser, S.V.Pineda, R.Powel, P.-G.Reinhard, L.Renth, E.Romero-Romero, R.Roth, A.Schwenk, C.Sumithrarachchi, A.Teigelhofer Charge Radii of 55, 56Ni Reveal a Surprisingly Similar Behavior at N=28 in Ca and Ni Isotopes NUCLEAR MOMENTS 54,55,56,57,58,59,60Ni; measured frequencies; deduced Isotope shifts, differential ms charge radii, and absolute rms charge radii. Comparison with nuclear density functional theory (DFT) calculations. National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL) at Michigan State University (MSU) and collinear laser spectroscopy (CLS) at the BECOLA facility.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.132501
2022TI04 Phys.Rev. C 106, 024320 (2022) A.Tichai, P.Arthuis, K.Hebeler, M.Heinz, J.Hoppe, A.Schwenk, L.Zurek Least-square approach for singular value decompositions of scattering problems
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024320
2021ES07 Phys.Rev.Lett. 127, 192701 (2021) R.Essick, I.Tews, P.Landry, A.Schwenk Astrophysical Constraints on the Symmetry Energy and the Neutron Skin of 208Pb with Minimal Modeling Assumptions NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb; analyzed available data; deduced astrophysical constraints on the symmetry energy and the neutron skin.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.192701
2021ES10 Phys.Rev. C 104, 065804 (2021) R.Essick, P.Landry, A.Schwenk, I.Tews Detailed examination of astrophysical constraints on the symmetry energy and the neutron skin of 208Pb with minimal modeling assumptions NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb; analyzed correlations between selected nuclear properties such as symmetry energy, slope parameter, curvature, 208Pb skin and electric dipole polarizability using nonparametric equation of state (EOS) representation based on Gaussian processes to constrain the symmetry energy, slope parameter, and 208Pb skin from observations of neutron stars with minimal modeling assumptions, and by combining astrophysical data from heavy pulsar masses, LIGO/Virgo, and NICER with chiral effective field theory (χEFT) and constraints from PREX-II experiment for 208Pb skin thickness, and using Monte Carlo implementation of a hierarchical Bayesian inference. Relevance to neutron-skin thickness of nuclei to the crust thickness and the radius of neutron stars.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.065804
2021FR01 Phys.Rev.Lett. 126, 102501 (2021) U.Friman-Gayer, C.Romig, T.Huther, K.Albe, S.Bacca, T.Beck, M.Berger, J.Birkhan, K.Hebeler, O.J.Hernandez, J.Isaak, S.Konig, N.Pietralla, P.C.Ries, J.Rohrer, R.Roth, D.Savran, M.Scheck, A.Schwenk, R.Seutin, V.Werner Role of Chiral Two-Body Currents in 6Li Magnetic Properties in Light of a New Precision Measurement with the Relative Self-Absorption Technique RADIOACTIVITY 6Li(IT) [from 6Li(γ, γ'), E<7.1 MeV]; measured decay products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced B(M1), decay width. Comparison with ab initio calculations based on chiral effective field theory that take into account contributions to the magnetic dipole operator beyond leading order.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.102501
2021FU10 Few-Body Systems 62, 72 (2021) R.J.Furnstahl, H.-W.Hammer, A.Schwenk Nuclear Structure at the Crossroads
doi: 10.1007/s00601-021-01658-5
2021HE11 Phys.Rev. C 103, 044318 (2021) M.Heinz, A.Tichai, J.Hoppe, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk In-medium similarity renormalization group with three-body operators NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He, 16O; calculated ground-state energies using various truncation schemes. Full and approximate in-medium similarity renormalization group (IMSRG(3)) truncations applied to the closed-shell nuclei using nucleon-nucleon and nucleon-nucleon+3N-chiral Hamiltonians with the Hartree-Fock and natural orbital single-particle bases.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.044318
2021HO03 Phys.Rev. C 103, 014321 (2021) J.Hoppe, A.Tichai, M.Heinz, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk Natural orbitals for many-body expansion methods NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 16,22O, 40Ca, 78Ni; calculated one-body proton density matrix, occupation numbers of the single-particle proton orbitals, and absolute value of the radial wave function for 16O, negative occupations of the p orbitals for 16O and 22O, ground-state energies and charge radii of 16O, 40Ca and 78Ni. Nonperturbative many-body calculations using the in-medium similarity renormalization group (IMSRG) approach, with large single-particle basis. Comparison with experimental data for 78Ni.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.014321
2021HU04 Phys.Rev. C 103, 025803 (2021) S.Huth, C.Wellenhofer, A.Schwenk New equations of state constrained by nuclear physics, observations, and QCD calculations of high-density nuclear matter
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.025803
2021KE06 Phys.Rev. C 103, 055806 (2021) J.Keller, C.Wellenhofer, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk Neutron matter at finite temperature based on chiral effective field theory interactions
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.055806
2021MO23 Nat.Phys. 17, 1099 (2021) M.Mougeot, D.Atanasov, J.Karthein, R.N.Wolf, P.Ascher, K.Blaum, K.Chrysalidis, G.Hagen, J.D.Holt, W.J.Huang, G.R.Jansen, I.Kulikov, Yu.A.Litvinov, D.Lunney, V.Manea, T.Miyagi, T.Papenbrock, L.Schweikhard, A.Schwenk, T.Steinsberger, S.R.Stroberg, Z.H.Sun, A.Welker, F.Wienholtz, S.G.Wilkins, K.Zuber Mass measurements of 99-101In challenge ab initio nuclear theory of the nuclide 100Sn NUCLEAR REACTIONS La(p, X)99In/100In/101In, E=1.4 GeV; measured reaction products, TOF; deduced atomic masses. Comparison with AME2020, theoretical calculations.
doi: 10.1038/s41567-021-01326-9
2021ST03 Phys.Rev.Lett. 126, 022501 (2021) S.R.Stroberg, J.D.Holt, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis Ab Initio Limits of Atomic Nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=1-26; calculated probabilities for given isotopes to be bound with respect to one- or two-neutron (proton) removals, separation energies, dripline using a chiral two- and three-nucleon interaction with good saturation properties, we use the valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.022501
2021WE11 Phys.Rev. C 104, 014003 (2021) C.Wellenhofer, C.Drischler, A.Schwenk Effective field theory for dilute Fermi systems at fourth order
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.014003
2021ZU01 Phys.Rev. C 103, 014325 (2021) L.Zurek, E.A.Coello Perez, S.K.Bogner, R.J.Furnstahl, A.Schwenk Comparing different density-matrix expansions for long-range pion exchange NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 16O, 48Ca, 132Sn; calculated normalized density-matrix square for 132Sn, isoscalar density distributions, and ratios of the DME-approximated and exact exchange energy contributions for Yukawa interaction for 16O, 48Ca, 132Sn, scalar-isoscalar and scalar-isovector exchange-energy integrands for Yukawa interaction in 132Sn. Density-matrix expansion (DME) with two-body scalar terms to embed long-range pion interactions into a Skyrme energy density functional.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.014325
2020CI02 Phys.Rev. C 101, 021303 (2020) M.Ciemala, S.Ziliani, F.C.L.Crespi, S.Leoni, B.Fornal, A.Maj, P.Bednarczyk, G.Benzoni, A.Bracco, C.Boiano, S.Bottoni, S.Brambilla, M.Bast, M.Beckers, T.Braunroth, F.Camera, N.Cieplicka-Orynczak, E.Clement, S.Coelli, O.Dorvaux, S.Erturk, G.de France, C.Fransen, A.Goldkuhle, J.Grebosz, M.N.Harakeh, L.W.Iskra, B.Jacquot, A.Karpov, M.Kicinska-Habior, Y.Kim, M.Kmiecik, A.Lemasson, S.M.Lenzi, M.Lewitowicz, H.Li, I.Matea, K.Mazurek, C.Michelagnoli, M.Matejska-Minda, B.Million, C.Muller-Gatermann, V.Nanal, P.Napiorkowski, D.R.Napoli, R.Palit, M.Rejmund, Ch.Schmitt, M.Stanoiu, I.Stefan, E.Vardaci, B.Wasilewska, O.Wieland, M.Zieblinski, M.Zielinska, A.Atac, D.Barrientos, B.Birkenbach, A.J.Boston, B.Cederwall, L.Charles, J.Collado, D.M.Cullen, P.Desesquelles, C.Domingo-Pardo, J.Dudouet, J.Eberth, V.Gonzalez, J.Goupil, L.J.Harkness-Brennan, H.Hess, D.S.Judson, A.Jungclaus, W.Korten, M.Labiche, A.Lefevre, R.Menegazzo, D.Mengoni, J.Nyberg, R.M.Perez-Vidal, Zs.Podolyak, A.Pullia, F.Recchia, P.Reiter, F.Saillant, M.D.Salsac, E.Sanchis, O.Stezowski, Ch.Theisen, J.J.Valiente-Dobon, J.D.Holt, J.Menendez, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis Testing ab initio nuclear structure in neutron-rich nuclei: Lifetime measurements of second 2+ state in 16C and 20O NUCLEAR REACTIONS 181Ta(18O, X)16C/19O/20O, E=7.0 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products, Eγ, Iγ, (particle)γ-coin, level half-lives by Doppler-shift attenuation method and Monte Carlo simulations using AGATA array, coupled to the PARIS scintillator array and to the VAMOS++ magnetic spectrometer at GANIL. 16C, 19,20O; deduced levels, J, π. Comparison with predictions of the valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG) and the no-core shell model (NCSM) with NN and 3N interactions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.021303
2020CO01 Phys.Lett. B 800, 135071 (2020) M.L.Cortes, W.Rodriguez, P.Doornenbal, A.Obertelli, J.D.Holt, S.M.Lenzi, J.Menendez, F.Nowacki, K.Ogata, A.Poves, T.R.Rodriguez, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis, S.R.Stroberg, K.Yoshida, L.Achouri, H.Baba, F.Browne, D.Calvet, F.Chateau, S.Chen, N.Chiga, A.Corsi, A.Delbart, J.-M.Gheller, A.Giganon, A.Gillibert, C.Hilaire, T.Isobe, T.Kobayashi, Y.Kubota, V.Lapoux, H.N.Liu, T.Motobayashi, I.Murray, H.Otsu, V.Panin, N.Paul, H.Sakurai, M.Sasano, D.Steppenbeck, L.Stuhl, Y.L.Sun, Y.Togano, T.Uesaka, K.Wimmer, K.Yoneda, O.Aktas, T.Aumann, L.X.Chung, F.Flavigny, S.Franchoo, I.Gasparic, R.-B.Gerst, J.Gibelin, K.I.Hahn, D.Kim, T.Koiwai, Y.Kondo, P.Koseoglou, J.Lee, C.Lehr, B.D.Linh, T.Lokotko, M.MacCormick, K.Moschner, T.Nakamura, S.Y.Park, D.Rossi, E.Sahin, D.Sohler, P.-A.Soderstrom, S.Takeuchi, H.Toernqvist, V.Vaquero, V.Wagner, S.Wang, V.Werner, X.Xu, H.Yamada, D.Yan, Z.Yang, M.Yasuda, L.Zanetti Shell evolution of N=40 isotones towards 60Ca: First spectroscopy of 62Ti NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(63V, 2p)62Ti, E≈200 MeV/nucleon, [secondary 63V beam from 9Be(70Zn, X), E=345 MeV/nucleon primary reaction followed by separation of fragments of interest event-by-event using BigRIPS spectrometer at RIBF-RIKEN]; measured yields of reaction products with Z=22-24 and A/Q=2.60 to 2.85, Eγ, Iγ, γγ-coin using MINOS device, SAMURAI dipole magnet, Time Projection Chamber (TPC), and DALI2+ array of 226 NaI(Tl) detectors. 62Ti; deduced first 2+ and 4+ levels, cross sections. Comparison with theoretical calculations for N=40, Z=20-32 (even) using large-scale shell model (LSSM), symmetry conserving configuration mixing (SCCM) with Gogny D1S effective interaction, and valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG).
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135071
2020CO12 Phys.Rev. C 102, 064320 (2020) M.L.Cortes, W.Rodriguez, P.Doornenbal, A.Obertelli, J.D.Holt, J.Menendez, K.Ogata, A.Schwenk, N.Shimizu, J.Simonis, Y.Utsuno, K.Yoshida, L.Achouri, H.Baba, F.Browne, D.Calvet, F.Chateau, S.Chen, N.Chiga, A.Corsi, A.Delbart, J.-M.Gheller, A.Giganon, A.Gillibert, C.Hilaire, T.Isobe, T.Kobayashi, Y.Kubota, V.Lapoux, H.N.Liu, T.Motobayashi, I.Murray, H.Otsu, V.Panin, N.Paul, H.Sakurai, M.Sasano, D.Steppenbeck, L.Stuhl, Y.L.Sun, Y.Togano, T.Uesaka, K.Wimmer, K.Yoneda, O.Aktas, T.Aumann, L.X.Chung, F.Flavigny, S.Franchoo, I.Gasparic, R.-B.Gerst, J.Gibelin, K.I.Hahn, D.Kim, T.Koiwai, Y.Kondo, P.Koseoglou, J.Lee, C.Lehr, B.D.Linh, T.Lokotko, M.MacCormick, K.Moschner, T.Nakamura, S.Y.Park, D.Rossi, E.Sahin, P.-A.Soderstrom, D.Sohler, S.Takeuchi, H.Toernqvist, V.Vaquero, V.Wagner, S.Wang, V.Werner, X.Xu, H.Yamada, D.Yan, Z.Yang, M.Yasuda, L.Zanetti N = 32 shell closure below calcium: Low-lying structure of 50Ar NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(52Ca, 3p), E=266 MeV; 1H(53Ca, n3p), E=258 MeV; 1H(54Ca, 2n3p), E=251 MeV; 1H(55Ca, 3n3p), E=247 MeV; 1H(51K, 2p), E=257 MeV; 1H(52K, n2p), E=250 MeV; 1H(53K, 2n2p), E=245 MeV; 1H(51Ar, np), E=241 MeV; 1H(50Ar, p'), [secondary 52,53,54,55Ca, 51,52,53K, 50,51Ar beams from 9Be(70Zn, X), E=345 MeV/nucleon primary beam, followed by separation of fragments using BigRIPS separator at RIBF-RIKEN facility]; measured reaction products, yields, inclusive σ, Eγ, Iγ, γγ-coin using the MINOS hydrogen target, time projection chamber, SAMURAI dipole magnet, and DALI2+ array of 226 NaI(Tl) detectors. 50Ar; deduced Doppler corrected γ-ray spectra, levels, J, π; calculated levels, J, π, spectroscopic factors and cross sections for levels using the SDPF-MU shell model, and ab initio VS-IMSRG approach.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.064320
2020DE11 Phys.Rev. C 101, 041302 (2020) P.Demol, T.Duguet, A.Ekstrom, M.Frosini, K.Hebeler, S.Konig, D.Lee, A.Schwenk, V.Soma, A.Tichai Improved many-body expansions from eigenvector continuation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H, 18O; calculated ground state energies using many-body perturbation theory (MBPT)-based eigenvector continuation (EC) resummation method for 3He, and Bogoliubov many-body perturbation theory (BMBPT)-based EC resummation method for 16O, using realistic nuclear two-body interaction derived from chiral effective field theory. Comparison with MBPT, BMBPT, and MBPT-based Pade approximation calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.041302
2020DU09 Phys.Rev. C 102, 014622 (2020) Dispersion relations applied to double-folding potentials from chiral effective field theory NUCLEAR REACTIONS 16O(16O, 16O), E=124, 250, 350, 480, 704 MeV; 12C(12C, 12C), E=159, 240, 300, 360, 1016 MeV; 16O(12C, 12C), E=76.4, 130, 230, 300, 608 MeV; calculated optical potentials, elastic scattering σ(E) as a function of momentum transfer, influence of nucleonic density on elastic scattering σ, and astrophysical S factors using double-folding method based on chiral effective field theory nucleon-nucleon interactions at next-to-next-to-leading (N2LO) order combined with dispersion relation constraints. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.014622
2020HE25 Phys.Lett. B 809, 135678 (2020) S.Heil, M.Petri, K.Vobig, D.Bazin, J.Belarge, P.Bender, B.A.Brown, R.Elder, B.Elman, A.Gade, T.Haylett, J.D.Holt, T.Huther, A.Hufnagel, H.Iwasaki, N.Kobayashi, C.Loelius, B.Longfellow, E.Lunderberg, M.Mathy, J.Menendez, S.Paschalis, R.Roth, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis, I.Syndikus, D.Weisshaar, K.Whitmore Electromagnetic properties of 21O for benchmarking nuclear Hamiltonians NUCLEAR REACTIONS 9Be(24F, 21O), E=95 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products, Eγ, Iγ. 21O; deduced γ-ray energies, J, π, level T1/2, B(E2). Comparison with theoretical calculations.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135678
2020KA22 Phys.Rev.Lett. 124, 132502 (2020) S.Kaufmann, J.Simonis, S.Bacca, J.Billowes, M.L.Bissell, K.Blaum, B.Cheal, R.F.Garcia Ruiz, W.Gins, C.Gorges, G.Hagen, H.Heylen, A.Kanellakopoulos, S.Malbrunot-Ettenauer, M.Miorelli, R.Neugart, G.Neyens, W.Nortershauser, R.Sanchez, S.Sailer, A.Schwenk, T.Ratajczyk, L.V.Rodriguez, L.Wehner, C.Wraith, L.Xie, Z.Y.Xu, X.F.Yang, D.T.Yordanov Charge Radius of the Short-Lived 68Ni and Correlation with the Dipole Polarizability NUCLEAR MOMENTS 58,60,61,62,64,68Ni; measured frequencies; deduced resonance spectra, isotope shifts, nuclear charge radii. Comparison with novel coupled-cluster calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.132502
2020LE14 Phys.Rev.Lett. 125, 142502 (2020) M.Leonhardt, M.Pospiech, B.Schallmo, J.Braun, C.Drischler, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk Symmetric Nuclear Matter from the Strong Interaction
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.142502
2020LY02 J.Phys.(London) G47, 045109 (2020) J.E.Lynn, D.Lonardoni, J.Carlson, J.-W.Chen, W.Detmold, S.Gandolfi, A.Schwenk Ab initio short-range-correlation scaling factors from light to medium-mass nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 2,3H, 3,4,6He, 6Li, 12C, 16O, 40Ca, 63Cu, 56Fe, 197Au; calculated two-nucleon distributions, short-range-correlation(SRC) scaling factors, binding energies from ab initio low-energy nuclear theory.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ab6af7
2020MA09 Phys.Rev.Lett. 124, 092502 (2020) V.Manea, J.Karthein, D.Atanasov, M.Bender, K.Blaum, T.E.Cocolios, S.Eliseev, A.Herlert, J.D.Holt, W.J.Huang, Y.A.Litvinov, D.Lunney, J.Menendez, M.Mougeot, D.Neidherr, L.Schweikhard, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis, A.Welker, F.Wienholtz, K.Zuber First Glimpse of the N=82 Shell Closure below Z=50 from Masses of Neutron-Rich Cadmium Isotopes and Isomers ATOMIC MASSES 124,126,127,127m,128,129,129m,131,132Cd; measured mass excesses using phase-imaging ion cyclotron-resonance (PI-ICR) method with the ISOLTRAP spectrometer at ISOLDE-CERN. Cd isotopes were produced in U(p, F), E=1.4 GeV reaction followed by separation of fission fragments using ISOLDE High-resolution separator. Comparison with literature data in AME2016 evaluation, and with large-scale shell-model, mean-field, beyond-mean-field, and ab initio valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG) calculations. Systematics of S(n) for N=81, 83 and Z=48-68, and for two-neutron shell gaps for N=82, Z=42-70 nuclei.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.092502
2020MO25 Phys.Rev. C 102, 014301 (2020) M.Mougeot, D.Atanasov, C.Barbieri, K.Blaum, M.Breitenfeld, A.de Roubin, T.Duguet, S.George, F.Herfurth, A.Herlert, J.D.Holt, J.Karthein, D.Lunney, V.Manea, P.Navratil, D.Neidherr, M.Rosenbusch, L.Schweikhard, A.Schwenk, V.Soma, A.Welker, F.Wienholtz, R.N.Wolf, K.Zuber Examining the N=28 shell closure through high-precision mass measurements of 46-48Ar ATOMIC MASSES 46,47,48Ar; measured Ramsey-type time-of-flight ion-cyclotron-resonances (TOF-ICR), mass excesses using the ISOLTRAP Penning trap mass spectrometer at CERN-ISOLDE. Comparison with previous experimental results, and with AME2016 and AME2012 evaluations. Radioactive argon isotopes produced in U(p, F), E=1.4 GeV reaction, and separated using ISOLTRAP on-line mass spectrometer and the ISOLDE High-Resolution Separator (HRS). Comparison with ab initio calculations using the valence space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG) with self-consistent Green's function approach, and with the predictions from the UNEDF0 density functional, SDPF-U shell model. Systematics of S(2n) and pairing gaps in N=24-32 S, Cl, Ar, K, and Ca isotopes.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.014301
2020YA05 Phys.Rev.Lett. 124, 092701 (2020) H.Yasin, S.Schafer, A.Arcones, A.Schwenk Equation of State Effects in Core-Collapse Supernovae
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.092701
2020YA07 Phys.Rev.Lett. 124, 092701 (2020) H.Yasin, S.Schafer, A.Arcones, A.Schwenk Equation of State Effects in Core-Collapse Supernovae
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.092701
2019CA20 Phys.Rev. C 100, 025805 (2019) Ab initio constraints on thermal effects of the nuclear equation of state
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.025805
2019DR01 Phys.Rev.Lett. 122, 042501 (2019) C.Drischler, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk Chiral Interactions up to Next-to-Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order and Nuclear Saturation
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.042501
2019GY02 Nat.Phys. 15, 428 (2019) P.Gysbers, G.Hagen, J.D.Holt, G.R.Jansen, T.D.Morris, P.Navratil, T.Papenbrock, S.Quaglioni, A.Schwenk, S.R.Stroberg, K.A.Wendt Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H, 6Li, 7Be, 8He, 10C, 14O, 19,24Ne, 37K, 25,28Al, 24,26Na, 30Mg, 33,34P, 42,43,46Sc, 42,45Ti, 45,47V, 100Sn; calculated the Gamow–Teller strength for β decay.
doi: 10.1038/s41567-019-0450-7
2019HO09 Phys.Rev. C 100, 024318 (2019) J.Hoppe, C.Drischler, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis Probing chiral interactions up to next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order in medium-mass nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H, 16,24O, 40,48,52,60Ca, 56,68Ni; calculated binding energies, charge radii, and ground-state energies per nucleon. Ab initio calculations using in-medium similarity renormalization group (IM-SRG) based on chiral interactions at next-to-leading order (NLO), N2LO, and N3LO. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024318
2019KL06 Phys.Rev. C 99, 061301 (2019) A.Klose, K.Minamisono, A.J.Miller, B.A.Brown, D.Garand, J.D.Holt, J.D.Lantis, Y.Liu, B.Maass, W.Nortershauser, S.V.Pineda, D.M.Rossi, A.Schwenk, F.Sommer, C.Sumithrarachchi, A.Teigelhofer, J.Watkins Ground-state electromagnetic moments of 37Ca NUCLEAR MOMENTS 37,39Ca; measured hyperfine structure spectra using the collinear laser spectroscopy technique at NSCL-BECOLA facility; deduced hyperfine coupling constants, and isoscalar- and isovector-magnetic moment of the ground states. 37,39Ca produced in 9Be(40Ca, X), E=140 MeV/nucleon reaction, and separation of fragments using A1900 fragment separator at NSCL-MSU. Comparison with shell model calculations using the universal sd model-space Hamiltonians (USDA/B). Systematics of experimental and theoretical magnetic moments of ground states of 37,39Ca, 37Cl and 39K.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.061301
2019LI10 Phys.Rev.Lett. 122, 072502 (2019) H.N.Liu, A.Obertelli, P.Doornenbal, C.A.Bertulani, G.Hagen, J.D.Holt, G.R.Jansen, T.D.Morris, A.Schwenk, R.Stroberg, N.Achouri, H.Baba, F.Browne, D.Calvet, F.Chateau, S.Chen, N.Chiga, A.Corsi, M.L.Cortes, A.Delbart, J.-M.Gheller, A.Giganon, A.Gillibert, C.Hilaire, T.Isobe, T.Kobayashi, Y.Kubota, V.Lapoux, T.Motobayashi, I.Murray, H.Otsu, V.Panin, N.Paul, W.Rodriguez, H.Sakurai, M.Sasano, D.Steppenbeck, L.Stuhl, Y.L.Sun, Y.Togano, T.Uesaka, K.Wimmer, K.Yoneda, O.Aktas, T.Aumann, L.X.Chung, F.Flavigny, S.Franchoo, I.Gasparic, R.-B.Gerst, J.Gibelin, K.I.Hahn, D.Kim, T.Koiwai, Y.Kondo, P.Koseoglou, J.Lee, C.Lehr, B.D.Linh, T.Lokotko, M.MacCormick, K.Moschner, T.Nakamura, S.Y.Park, D.Rossi, E.Sahin, D.Sohler, P.-A.Soderstrom, S.Takeuchi, H.Tornqvist, V.Vaquero, V.Wagner, S.Wang, V.Werner, X.Xu, H.Yamada, D.Yan, Z.Yang, M.Yasuda, L.Zanetti How Robust is the N=34 Subshell Closure? First Spectroscopy of 52Ar NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(53K, 2p), E=245 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced γ-ray energies, J, π, σ. Comparison with theoretical calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.072502
2019TA10 Nature(London) 569, 53 (2019) R.Taniuchi, C.Santamaria, P.Doornenbal, A.Obertelli, K.Yoneda, G.Authelet, H.Baba, D.Calvet, F.Chateau, A.Corsi, A.Delbart, J.-M.Gheller, A.Gillibert, J.D.Holt, T.Isobe, V.Lapoux, M.Matsushita, J.Menendez, S.Momiyama, T.Motobayashi, M.Niikura, F.Nowacki, K.Ogata, H.Otsu, T.Otsuka, C.Péron, S.Peru, A.Peyaud, E.C.Pollacco, A.Poves, J.-Y.Rousse, H.Sakurai, A.Schwenk, Y.Shiga, J.Simonis, S.R.Stroberg, S.Takeuchi, Y.Tsunoda, T.Uesaka, H.Wang, F.Browne, L.X.Chung, Z.Dombradi, S.Franchoo, F.Giacoppo, A.Gottardo, K.Hadynska-Klek, Z.Korkulu, S.Koyama, Y.Kubota, J.Lee, M.Lettmann, C.Louchart, R.Lozeva, K.Matsui, T.Miyazaki, S.Nishimura, L.Olivier, S.Ota, Z.Patel, E.Sahin, C.Shand, P.-A.Soderstrom, I.Stefan, D.Steppenbeck, T.Sumikama, D.Suzuki, Z.Vajta, V.Werner, J.Wu, Z.Y.Xu 78Ni revealed as a doubly magic stronghold against nuclear deformation NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(79Cu, 2p), (80Zn, 3p)78Ni, E ∼ 250 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced partial σ, energy levels, J, π, magic nature. Comparison with theoretical calculations.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1155-x
2019XU09 Phys.Rev. C 99, 064303 (2019) X.Xu, M.Wang, K.Blaum, J.D.Holt, Yu.A.Litvinov, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis, S.R.Stroberg, Y.H.Zhang, H.S.Xu, P.Shuai, X.L.Tu, X.H.Zhou, F.R.Xu, G.Audi, R.J.Chen, X.C.Chen, C.Y.Fu, Z.Ge, W.J.Huang, S.Litvinov, D.W.Liu, Y.H.Lam, X.W.Ma, R.S.Mao, A.Ozawa, B.H.Sun, Y.Sun, T.Uesaka, G.Q.Xiao, Y.M.Xing, T.Yamaguchi, Y.Yamaguchi, X.L.Yan, Q.Zeng, H.W.Zhao, T.C.Zhao, W.Zhang, W.L.Zhan Masses of neutron-rich 52-54Sc and 54, 56Ti nuclides: The N=32 subshell closure in scandium ATOMIC MASSES 52,53,54Sc, 54,56Ti; measured mass excesses using isochronous mass spectrometry at CRSe-HIRFL, Lanzhou. Isotopes produced in 9Be(86Kr, X), E=460.65 MeV/nucleon reaction and separated using RIBLL2. Comparison with AME-2012 evaluation, and results from six previous experiments, and with valence-space in-medium similarity renormalization group (VS-IMSRG) calculations. Systematics of S(2n) values in N=27-34 K, Ca, Sc, Ti isotopic chains, and those of empirical shell gaps in N=24-34 K, Ca, Sc, Ti isotopic chains and Z=19-25 N=32 isotones.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064303
2018CO13 Phys.Rev. C 98, 045501 (2018) E.A.Coello Perez, J.Menendez, A.Schwenk Gamow-Teller and double-β decays of heavy nuclei within an effective theory RADIOACTIVITY 62,64Cu, 68Ga, 78,80Br, 80,82Rb, 104Rh, 106,108Ag, 112In, 128I(EC), (β+); 66,68Cu, 70Ga, 80As, 80Br, 98,100Nb, 100,102Tc, 104,106,108Rh, 108,110,114Ag, 114,116,118,120,122In(β-); 64Zn, 106,108Cd, 112Sn(2EC); 70Zn, 76Ge, 80,82Se, 100Mo, 104Ru, 114,116Cd, 110Pd, 128,130Te(2β-); calculated Gamow-Teller matrix elements from 1+ parent states in single β decay, and for 2νββ and 2ν(EC)(EC) decay modes from 0+ parent states using effective field framework. Comparison with experimental values. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 64Ni, 76Ge, 82Se, 100Mo, 116Cd, 128,130Te(3He, t), E not given; analyzed experimental partial Gamow-Teller strengths; deduced logft values, and compared with available experimental values.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.045501
2018HU12 Phys.Rev. C 98, 044301 (2018) L.Huth, V.Durant, J.Simonis, A.Schwenk Shell-model interactions from chiral effective field theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 18,19,20O, 19,21,22F, 21,23,24Ne, 24,26,28Mg, 26,28,29Al, 29,30,31Si, 32,33,35P, 32,33,35S, 34,35,37Cl, 36,37Ar, 38K; calculated levels, J, π for the chiral shell-model interactions at LO, NLO, and NLOvs, and compared to experimental, and USDA/USDB shell-model results.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044301
2018KL03 Phys.Rev. C 98, 034004 (2018) P.Klos, S.Konig, H.-W.Hammer, J.E.Lynn, A.Schwenk Signatures of few-body resonances in finite volume
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.034004
2018LE03 Phys.Rev.Lett. 120, 062503 (2018) E.Leistenschneider, M.P.Reiter, S.Ayet San Andres, B.Kootte, J.D.Holt, P.Navratil, C.Babcock, C.Barbieri, B.R.Barquest, J.Bergmann, J.Bollig, T.Brunner, E.Dunling, A.Finlay, H.Geissel, L.Graham, F.Greiner, H.Hergert, C.Hornung, C.Jesch, R.Klawitter, Y.Lan, D.Lascar, K.G.Leach, W.Lippert, J.E.McKay, S.F.Paul, A.Schwenk, D.Short, J.Simonis, V.Soma, R.Steinbrugge, S.R.Stroberg, R.Thompson, M.E.Wieser, C.Will, M.Yavor, C.Andreoiu, T.Dickel, I.Dillmann, G.Gwinner, W.R.Plass, C.Scheidenberger, A.A.Kwiatkowski, J.Dilling Dawning of the N=32 Shell Closure Seen through Precision Mass Measurements of Neutron-Rich Titanium Isotopes ATOMIC MASSES 51V, 51,52,53,54,55Ti, 52,53,54,55Cr; measured radio frequencies, TOF; deduced mass excesses. Comparison with the AME16 recommended values.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.062503
2018LO06 Phys.Rev.Lett. 120, 122502 (2018) D.Lonardoni, J.Carlson, S.Gandolfi, J.E.Lynn, K.E.Schmidt, A.Schwenk, X.B.Wang Properties of Nuclei up to A=16 using Local Chiral Interactions NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 6He, 6Li, 12C, 16O; calculated ground-state energies and charge radii, form factors. Continuum quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) method, comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.122502
2018LO09 Phys.Rev. C 97, 044318 (2018) D.Lonardoni, S.Gandolfi, J.E.Lynn, C.Petrie, J.Carlson, K.E.Schmidt, A.Schwenk Auxiliary field diffusion Monte Carlo calculations of light and medium-mass nuclei with local chiral interactions NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H, 3,4,6He, 6Li, 12C, 16O; calculated constrained and unconstrained ground state binding energies, charge radii, charge form factors, and Coulomb sum rule by auxilliary field diffusion Monte Carlo (AFDMC) method using AV6' potential in combination with local chiral two- and three-nucleon interactions up to next-to-next-to-leading order; analyzed p-wave n-α elastic scattering phase shifts compared to an R-matrix analysis of experimental data. Comparison with GFMC predictions for Coulomb sum rule.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044318
2018MO07 Phys.Rev.Lett. 120, 152503 (2018) T.D.Morris, J.Simonis, S.R.Stroberg, C.Stumpf, G.Hagen, J.D.Holt, G.R.Jansen, T.Papenbrock, R.Roth, A.Schwenk Structure of the Lightest Tin Isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 100,108,116,124,132Sn, 101Sn, 105Te; calculated energy levels, J, π using nucleon-nucleon and three-nucleon forces constrained by data of few-nucleon systems.
doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.120.152503
2018MO14 Phys.Rev.Lett. 120, 232501 (2018) M.Mougeot, D.Atanasov, K.Blaum, K.Chrysalidis, T.Day Goodacre, D.Fedorov, V.Fedosseev, S.George, F.Herfurth, J.D.Holt, D.Lunney, V.Manea, B.Marsh, D.Neidherr, M.Rosenbusch, S.Rothe, L.Schweikhard, A.Schwenk, C.Seiffert, J.Simonis, S.R.Stroberg, A.Welker, F.Wienholtz, R.N.Wolf, K.Zuber Precision Mass Measurements of 58-63Cr: Nuclear Collectivity Towards the N=40 Island of Inversion ATOMIC MASSES 58,59,60,61,62,63Cr; measured cyclotron frequency, TOF; deduced mass excesses. Comparison with AME16, theoretical calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.232501
2018TE03 Phys.Rev. C 98, 024001 (2018) Large-cutoff behavior of local chiral effective field theory interactions
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.024001
2017BI09 Phys.Rev.Lett. 118, 252501 (2017) J.Birkhan, M.Miorelli, S.Bacca, S.Bassauer, C.A.Bertulani, G.Hagen, H.Matsubara, P.von Neumann-Cosel, T.Papenbrock, N.Pietralla, V.Yu.Ponomarev, A.Richter, A.Schwenk, A.Tamii Electric Dipole Polarizability of 48Ca and Implications for the Neutron Skin NUCLEAR REACTIONS 48Ca(p, p'), E=295 MeV; 48Ca(γ, X), E<25 MeV; measured reaction products; deduced σ, electric dipole polarizability, B(E1).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.252501
2017CH55 Phys.Rev.Lett. 119, 262502 (2017) J.-W.Chen, W.Detmold, J.E.Lynn, A.Schwenk Short-Range Correlations and the EMC Effect in Effective Field Theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H, 3,4He, 9Be, 12C; calculated scaling factors, parameters. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.262502
2017CR03 Phys.Rev. C 95, 064317 (2017) H.L.Crawford, A.O.Macchiavelli, P.Fallon, M.Albers, V.M.Bader, D.Bazin, C.M.Campbell, R.M.Clark, M.Cromaz, J.Dilling, A.Gade, A.Gallant, J.D.Holt, R.V.F.Janssens, R.Krucken, C.Langer, T.Lauritsen, I.Y.Lee, J.Menendez, S.Noji, S.Paschalis, F.Recchia, J.Rissanen, A.Schwenk, M.Scott, J.Simonis, S.R.Stroberg, J.A.Tostevin, C.Walz, D.Weisshaar, A.Wiens, K.Wimmer, S.Zhu Unexpected distribution of ν1f7/2 strength in 49Ca NUCLEAR REACTIONS 9Be(48Ca, 47Ca), (50Ca, 49Ca), E not given, [secondary 48,50Ca beams from 9Be(82Se, X), E=140 MeV/nucleon primary reaction, and using A1900 fragment separator at NSCL-MSU]; measured reaction 1n-knockout products using S800 magnetic spectrograph, Eγ, Iγ, γγ-coin, γ(particle) correlated events, using GRETINA array for γ detection, σ(-1n), parallel momentum distributions. 47,49Ca; deduced levels, J, π, l-transfer, γ-ray yields by fitting the data with GEANT4 simulation, spectroscopic factors, configurations, spectroscopic strengths for the 1f7/2 neutron hole states. Comparison with shell-model calculations based on NN+3N force in ν(pf) model space, GXPF1 interaction, and NN+3N including the ν1g9/2 orbital.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064317
2017DR02 Phys.Rev. C 95, 024302 (2017) C.Drischler, T.Kruger, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk Pairing in neutron matter: New uncertainty estimates and three-body forces
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.024302
2017GA10 Phys.Rev.Lett. 118, 232501 (2017) S.Gandolfi, H.-W.Hammer, P.Klos, J.E.Lynn, A.Schwenk Is a Trineutron Resonance Lower in Energy than a Tetraneutron Resonance?
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.232501
2017HO05 Phys.Rev. C 95, 025801 (2017) C.J.Horowitz, O.L.Caballero, Z.Lin, E.O'Connor, A.Schwenk Neutrino-nucleon scattering in supernova matter from the virial expansion
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.025801
2017HO24 Phys.Rev. C 96, 054002 (2017) J.Hoppe, C.Drischler, R.J.Furnstahl, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk Weinberg eigenvalues for chiral nucleon-nucleon interactions
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054002
2017HU17 Phys.Rev. C 96, 054003 (2017) L.Huth, I.Tews, J.E.Lynn, A.Schwenk Analyzing the Fierz rearrangement freedom for local chiral two-nucleon potentials NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 2H, 4He; calculated binding energies, radii, phase-shifts in the framework of Chiral effective field theory (EFT), by constructing leading order (LO) and next-to-leading order (NLO) potentials for all possible LO-operator pairs.Calculated energy of neutron matter at different densities.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054003
2017KL03 Eur.Phys.J. A 53, 168 (2017); Erratum Eur.Phys.J. A 54, 76 (2018) P.Klos, A.Carbone, K.Hebeler, J.Menendez, A.Schwenk Uncertainties in constraining low-energy constants from 3H β decay RADIOACTIVITY 3H(β-); calculated low-energy constants of chiral effective field theory from T1/2; deduced uncertainty.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2017-12357-7
2017KO30 Phys.Rev. C 96, 025805 (2017) D.N.Kobyakov, C.J.Pethick, S.Reddy, A.Schwenk Dispersion and decay of collective modes in neutron star cores
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.025805
2017LY01 Phys.Rev. C 96, 054007 (2017) J.E.Lynn, I.Tews, J.Carlson, S.Gandolfi, A.Gezerlis, K.E.Schmidt, A.Schwenk Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of light nuclei with local chiral two- and three-nucleon interactions NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 2H; calculated deuteron wave functions, binding energy, asymptotic D/S ratio, quadrupole moment, root-mean-square (rms) matter radius, momentum distributions and tensor polarization at N2LO, deuteron energy at LO, NLO, and N2LO as function of radius. 3H, 3,4He; calculated wave functions for AV18+UIX at N22LO, energies using Green's function Monte Carlo (GFMC) method, kinetic and potential energy contributions to the GFMC energy, point-proton radii at LO, NLO, and N2LO, one-body proton and neutron distributions for 3,4He at N2LO, longitudinal charge form factor for 4He. Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) calculations for light nuclei with local chiral NN and 3N interactions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054007
2017SI17 Phys.Rev. C 96, 014303 (2017) J.Simonis, S.R.Stroberg, K.Hebeler, J.D.Holt, A.Schwenk Saturation with chiral interactions and consequences for finite nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 40,54Ca, 56,78Ni; calculated ground-state energies and charge radii using the closed-shell IM-SRG, and compared with evaluated experimental data. 4He, 16,22,24O, 36,40,48,52,54,60Ca, 48,56,68,78Ni; calculated binding energies and charge radii using the IM-SRG for the four Hamiltonians, and compared with evaluated data. 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32Na, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45S, 40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54Ca, 48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64Mn, 53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72Ni; calculated ground-state energies and S(2n), charge radii of Mn isotopes, first excited 2+ states of Ca, S and Ni isotopes using the VS-IM-SRG, and compared with experimental data. Calculations used ab initio in-medium similarity renormalization group (IM-SRG) method, and valence-space (VS) IM-SRG for charge radii.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.014303
2017ST03 Phys.Rev.Lett. 118, 032502 (2017) S.R.Stroberg, A.Calci, H.Hergert, J.D.Holt, S.K.Bogner, R.Roth, A.Schwenk Nucleus-Dependent Valence-Space Approach to Nuclear Structure NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 16,18,22O, 10B, 22Na, 46V, C, N, O, Na, Ca, Ni; calculated ground-state energies, J, π, the extension of ab initio nuclear structure calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.032502
2016DR06 Phys.Rev. C 93, 054314 (2016) C.Drischler, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk Asymmetric nuclear matter based on chiral two- and three-nucleon interactions
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054314
2016DR13 Phys.Rev. C 94, 054307 (2016) C.Drischler, A.Carbone, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk Neutron matter from chiral two- and three-nucleon calculations up to N3 LO
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.054307
2016GA34 Nat.Phys. 12, 594 (2016) R.F.Garcia Ruiz, M.L.Bissell, K.Blaum, A.Ekstrom, N.Frommgen, G.Hagen, M.Hammen, K.Hebeler, J.D.Holt, G.R.Jansen, M.Kowalska, K.Kreim, W.Nazarewicz, R.Neugart, G.Neyens, W.Nortershauser, T.Papenbrock, J.Papuga, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis, K.A.Wendt, D.T.Yordanov Unexpectedly large charge radii of neutron-rich calcium isotopes NUCLEAR REACTIONS U(p, X)43Ca/44Ca/45Ca/46Ca/47Ca/48Ca/49Ca/50Ca/51Ca/52Ca, E=1.4GeV; measured hyperfine structure spectra; deduced charge radii. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1038/nphys3645
2016HA27 Nat.Phys. 12, 186 (2016) G.Hagen, A.Ekstrom, C.Forssen, G.R.Jansen, W.Nazarewicz, T.Papenbrock, K.A.Wendt, S.Bacca, N.Barnea, B.Carlsson, C.Drischler, K.Hebeler, M.Hjorth-Jensen, M.Miorelli, G.Orlandini, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis Neutron and weak-charge distributions of the 48Ca nucleus NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 48Ca; calculated neutron skin parameters, radii. Ab initio calculations.
doi: 10.1038/nphys3529
2016KL06 Phys.Rev. C 94, 054005 (2016) P.Klos, J.E.Lynn, I.Tews, S.Gandolfi, A.Gezerlis, H.-W.Hammer, M.Hoferichter, A.Schwenk Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of two neutrons in finite volume NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 2n; calculated ground state, energy and nodal surface of the first excited state for a two neutron-system in a box; extracted low-energy S-wave scattering parameters from ground- and excited-state energies for different box sizes using Luscher formula. Auxiliary-field diffusion Monte Carlo (AFDMC) calculations, and chiral EFT interactions. Relevance to effective field theories of strong interaction.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.054005
2016LY02 Phys.Rev.Lett. 116, 062501 (2016) J.E.Lynn, I.Tews, J.Carlson, S.Gandolfi, A.Gezerlis, K.E.Schmidt, A.Schwenk Chiral Three-Nucleon Interactions in Light Nuclei, Neutron-α Scattering, and Neutron Matter NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He; analyzed available data; deduced binding and ground-state energies. Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of light nuclei using local two- and three-nucleon (3N) interactions derived from chiral effective field theory up to next-to-next-to-leading order (N2LO).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.062501
2016SI02 Phys.Rev. C 93, 011302 (2016) J.Simonis, K.Hebeler, J.D.Holt, J.Menendez, A.Schwenk Exploring sd-shell nuclei from two- and three-nucleon interactions with realistic saturation properties NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28O, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29F, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30Ne, 21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31Na, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32Mg, 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33Al, 24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34Si, 25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35P, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36S, 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37Cl, 28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38Ar, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39K, 30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40Ca; calculated S(2n), S(2p), energies of first 2+ states in even-even nuclei, and theoretical uncertainty estimates from variation of the resolution scale, the low-energy couplings, and from the many-body method. 22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32Mg, 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37Cl; calculated ground-state energies relative to that of 16O, and theoretical uncertainties. Comparison to AME-12 data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.011302
2016ST12 Phys.Rev. C 93, 051301 (2016) S.R.Stroberg, H.Hergert, J.D.Holt, S.K.Bogner, A.Schwenk Ground and excited states of doubly open-shell nuclei from ab initio valence-space Hamiltonians NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 19,23,25,26F, 20,22,24,25,26Ne, 24Mg; calculated levels, J, π, yrast states from ab initio in-medium similarity renormalization group (IM-SRG) Hamiltonians based on NN+3N-induced and NN+3N-full Hamiltonians. Comparison with experimental data, and with phenomenological USDB predictions. 17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29F, 18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30Ne; calculated ground-state energies from the A-dependent IM-SRG valence-space Hamiltonian. Comparison with AME-2012 values, and the phenomenological USDB interaction.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.051301
2016TE01 Phys.Rev. C 93, 024305 (2016) I.Tews, S.Gandolfi, A.Gezerlis, A.Schwenk Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of neutron matter with chiral three-body forces
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.024305
2015CA09 Phys.Rev. C 92, 014327 (2015) L.Caceres, A.Lepailleur, O.Sorlin, M.Stanoiu, D.Sohler, Zs.Dombradi, S.K.Bogner, B.A.Brown, H.Hergert, J.D.Holt, A.Schwenk, F.Azaiez, B.Bastin, C.Borcea, R.Borcea, C.Bourgeois, Z.Elekes, Zs.Fulop, S.Grevy, L.Gaudefroy, G.F.Grinyer, D.Guillemaud-Mueller, F.Ibrahim, A.Kerek, A.Krasznahorkay, M.Lewitowicz, S.M.Lukyanov, J.Mrazek, F.Negoita, F.de Oliveira, Yu.-E.Penionzhkevich, Zs.Podolyak, M.G.Porquet, F.Rotaru, P.Roussel-Chomaz, M.G.Saint-Laurent, H.Savajols, G.Sletten, J.C.Thomas, J.Timar, C.Timis, Zs.Vajta Nuclear structure studies of 24F NUCLEAR REACTIONS 9Be(36S, X)24O/26F/27Ne/28Ne/29Na/30Na, E=77.6 MeV/nucleon; measured energy loss, TOF, yields using LISE achromatic spectrometer at GANIL facility. C(27Na, 24F), E=54-65 MeV/nucleon, [secondary cocktail beam of 25,26Ne, 27,28Na, 29,30Mg from C(36S, X), E=77.6 MeV/nucleon primary reaction, and separated using ALPHA and SPEG spectrometers]; measured Eγ, Iγ, (particle)γ-, γγ-coin using Chateau de Cristal array. 24F; deduced levels, J, π, branching ratios, configurations. Comparison with shell-model calculations using USDA and USDB interactions, and ab initio shell-model calculations, using interactions derived from chiral NN+3N forces by means of IM-SRG. RADIOACTIVITY 24O(β-), (β-n)[from Be(36S, X), E=77.6 MeV/nucleon using LISE spectrometer at GANIL]; measured Eγ, Iγ, Eβ, βγ-, γγ-coin, (24O)β-correlations, half-life of 24O isotope from (24O)γ-correlated decay curve, β-delayed neutron emission probability Pn using four segmented Ge clover detectors of EXOGAM array for γ rays and DSSSDs for particles. 24F; deduced levels, J, π, branching ratios, β feedings, logft. Comparison with shell-model calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.014327
2015RR01 Phys.Rev. C 91, 035806 (2015) E.Rrapaj, J.W.Holt, A.Bartl, S.Reddy, A.Schwenk Charged-current reactions in the supernova neutrino-sphere NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1n(ν, e-)p, E=1-100 MeV; 1H(ν-bar, e+)n, E=1-100 MeV; calculated neutrino absorption rates due to charged-current reactions in the outer regions of a newly born neutron star called the neutrino-sphere, momentum-, density-, and temperature-dependent nucleon self-energies in the Hartree-Fock approximation.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.035806
2015RU02 Phys.Rev. C 91, 041304 (2015) R.F.Garcia Ruiz, M.L.Bissell, K.Blaum, N.Frommgen, M.Hammen, J.D.Holt, M.Kowalska, K.Kreim, J.Menendez, R.Neugart, G.Neyens, W.Nortershauser, F.Nowacki, J.Papuga, A.Poves, A.Schwenk, J.Simonis, D.T.Yordanov Ground-state electromagnetic moments of calcium isotopes NUCLEAR MOMENTS 43,45,47,49,51Ca; measured hyperfine spectra, hyperfine structure constants, J, g factors, magnetic and quadrupole moments using collinear laser spectroscopy (COLLAPS) and radiofrequency quadrupole (RFQ) beam cooler ISCOOL at ISOLDE-CERN facility. Comparison with theoretical predictions using KB3G, GXPF1A, SDPF.SM and three-nucleon forces (NN+3N). Ca beams produced in bombardment of uranium carbide target with 1.4-GeV protons at ISOLDE-CERN.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.041304
2015SH15 Phys.Rev. C 91, 042801 (2015) Neutrino-pair bremsstrahlung from nucleon-α versus nucleon-nucleon scattering
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.042801
2014BO25 Phys.Rev.Lett. 113, 142501 (2014) S.K.Bogner, H.Hergert, J.D.Holt, A.Schwenk, S.Binder, A.Calci, J.Langhammer, R.Roth Nonperturbative Shell-Model Interactions from the In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 21,22,23,24,25,26O; calculated energy levels, J, π. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.142501
2014BR01 Phys.Rev. C 89, 011307 (2014); Erratum Phys.Rev. C 91, 049902 (2015) Constraints on Skyrme equations of state from properties of doubly magic nuclei and ab initio calculations of low-density neutron matter NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 48Ca, 208Pb; calculated neutron skins and dipole polarizability using ab initio calculations of low-density neutron matter to constrain Skyrme equations of state (EOS) for neutron-rich conditions, using several EDFs. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.011307
2014DR01 Phys.Rev. C 89, 025806 (2014) C.Drischler, V.Soma, A.Schwenk Microscopic calculations and energy expansions for neutron-rich matter
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.025806
2014FO09 Phys.Rev. C 89, 041301 (2014) M.M.Forbes, A.Gezerlis, K.Hebeler, T.Lesinski, A.Schwenk Neutron polaron as a constraint on nuclear density functionals
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.041301
2014GA20 Phys.Rev.Lett. 113, 082501 (2014) A.T.Gallant, M.Brodeur, C.Andreoiu, A.Bader, A.Chaudhuri, U.Chowdhury, A.Grossheim, R.Klawitter, A.A.Kwiatkowski, K.G.Leach, A.Lennarz, T.D.Macdonald, B.E.Schultz, J.Lassen, H.Heggen, S.Raeder, A.Teigelhofer, B.A.Brown, A.Magilligan, J.D.Holt, J.Menendez, J.Simonis, A.Schwenk, J.Dilling Breakdown of the Isobaric Multiplet Mass Equation for the A=20 and 21 Multiplets ATOMIC MASSES 20,21Mg; measured time-of-flight ion cyclotron resonance; deduced masses. Comparison with shell model calculations, AME2012 mass evaluation.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.082501
2014GE06 Phys.Rev. C 90, 054323 (2014) A.Gezerlis, I.Tews, E.Epelbaum, M.Freunek, S.Gandolfi, K.Hebeler, A.Nogga, A.Schwenk Local chiral effective field theory interactions and quantum Monte Carlo applications NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 2H; calculated binding energy, quadrupole moment, magnetic moment, asymptotic D/S ratio, rms radius, asymptotic s-wave factor, and the d-state probability using the local chiral potentials. Calculated ground-state energy for a 66-neutron matter system. Local chiral effective field theory interactions to next-to-next-to-leading order and Monte Carlo calculations for neutron matter.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054323
2014HE03 Eur.Phys.J. A 50, 11 (2014) Symmetry energy, neutron skin, and neutron star radius from chiral effective field theory interactions
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14011-4
2014HO12 Phys.Rev. C 90, 024312 (2014) J.D.Holt, J.Menendez, J.Simonis, A.Schwenk Three-nucleon forces and spectroscopy of neutron-rich calcium isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70Ca; calculated ground-state energies in pf and pfg9/2 shells, convergence of 42Ca and 48Ca ground-state energies as a function of increasing intermediate-state excitations; calculated levels, J, π, B(E2), B(M1) for 43,44,45,46,47,48,49,51,52,53,54,55,56,57Ca, energy convergence. Chiral two- and three-nucleon (NN and 3N) interactions, and many-body perturbation theory (MBPT). Comparison with coupled-cluster calculations, and with available experimental data for A=43-57 Ca isotopes.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.024312
2014LY02 Phys.Rev.Lett. 113, 192501 (2014) J.E.Lynn, J.Carlson, E.Epelbaum, S.Gandolfi, A.Gezerlis, A.Schwenk Quantum Monte Carlo Calculations of Light Nuclei Using Chiral Potentials NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3,4He, 2,3H; calculated one- and two-body proton distributions, nuclear radii, binding energies; deduced the necessity of a three-body force.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.192501
2013GE03 Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 032501 (2013) A.Gezerlis, I.Tews, E.Epelbaum, S.Gandolfi, K.Hebeler, A.Nogga, A.Schwenk Quantum Monte Carlo Calculations with Chiral Effective Field Theory Interactions
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.032501
2013HE07 Phys.Rev. C 87, 034307 (2013) H.Hergert, S.K.Bogner, S.Binder, A.Calci, J.Langhammer, R.Roth, A.Schwenk In-medium similarity renormalization group with chiral two- plus three-nucleon interactions NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4He, 16,24O, 40,48Ca, 48,56Ni; calculated ground states energies, and binding energies using the in-medium similarity renormalization group (IM-SRG), based on chiral two- plus three-nucleon interactions. Comparison with coupled cluster calculations, truncated no-core shell model, and with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.034307
2013HO01 Phys.Rev.Lett. 110, 022502 (2013) J.D.Holt, J.Menendez, A.Schwenk Three-Body Forces and Proton-Rich Nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 18Ne, 19Na, 20Mg, 21Al, 22Si; calculated excitation energies, J, π, ground-state energy, one- and two-proton separation energies. Three-nucleon forces, comparison with AME2011, isobaric multiplet mass equation (IMME) IMME data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.022502
2013HO07 Eur.Phys.J. A 49, 39 (2013) J.D.Holt, J.Menendez, A.Schwenk Chiral three-nucleon forces and bound excited states in neutron-rich oxygen isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 21,22,23O; calculated low-lying levels, J, π using chiral two- and three-nucleon interactions. Compared with data and with other calculations.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2013-13039-2
2013KR10 Phys.Rev. C 88, 025802 (2013) T.Kruger, I.Tews, K.Hebeler, A.Schwenk Neutron matter from chiral effective field theory interactions
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.025802
2013SC14 J.Phys.:Conf.Ser. 445, 012009 (2013) Three-nucleon forces and nuclei at the extremes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28O; calculated single-particle energy. 48,49,50,51,52Ca; calculated 2n separation energy, Q. 42,44,46,48,50,52,54,56,58,60,62,64,66,68Ca;calculated 2+ energy. 16O, 17F, 18Ne, 19Na, 20Mg, 21Al, 22Si; calculated levels, J, π, Q. Two- and three-nucleon forces; compared with available data and AME.
doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/445/1/012009
Back to query form [Next] |