NSR Query Results

Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 27, 2024.

Search: Author = P.Sharma

Found 29 matches.

Back to query form

2024SA15      Eur.Phys.J. A 60, (2024)

G.Saxena, P.K.Sharma, P.Saxena

A global study of α-clusters decay in heavy and superheavy nuclei with half-life and preformation factor

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE N=100-180; calculated T_1/2, preformation factor with microscopic structural information and cast in the form of quite precise empirical formulas.

doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01259-w
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023DA19      Phys.Rev. C 108, 064304 (2023)

P.Das, U.Datta, S.Chakraborty, A.Rahaman, O.Tengblad, B.K.Agrawal, A.Becerril, J.Cederkall, J.Dey, A.Gottberg, S.M.Adil Imam, M.Kowalska, J.Kurcewicz, M.Lund, S.Mandal, M.Madurga, N.Marginean, R.Marginean, C.Mihai, I.Marroquin, E.Nacher, A.Negret, S.Pascu, A.Perea, E.Rapisarda, F.Rotaru, J.Ray, P.Sharma, T.Stora, C.Sotty, V.Vedia, N.Warr, R.Wadsworth

Exotic decay of ¹¹⁵Cs

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.064304
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.

2023JA02      Nucl.Phys. A1031, 122597 (2023)

A.Jain, P.K.Sharma, S.K.Jain, J.K.Deegwal, G.Saxena

Cluster radioactivity in trans-lead region: A systematic study with modified empirical formulas

RADIOACTIVITY ²²¹Fr, ^221,222,223Ra, ²²³Ac(¹⁴C), ²²³Ac(¹⁵N), ²²⁴Ra, ²²⁵Ac, ²²⁶Ra, ²²⁶Th(¹⁴C), ²²⁸Th(²⁰O), ²³⁰Th(²⁴Ne), ²³⁰U(²²Ne), ²³¹Pa(²⁴Ne), ²³²Th(²⁴Ne), (²⁶Ne), ²³²U(²⁴Ne), (²⁸Mg), ²³³U(²⁴Ne), (²⁵Ne), (²⁸Mg), ²³⁴U(²⁴Ne), (²⁶Ne), (²⁸Mg), ²³⁵U(²⁴Ne), (²⁵Ne), (²⁸Mg), (²⁹Mg), ²³⁶U(²⁴Ne), (²⁶Ne), (²⁸Mg), (³⁰Mg), ²³⁶Pu(²⁸Mg), ²³⁷Np(³⁰Mg), ²³⁸Pu(²⁸Mg), (³⁰Mg), (³²Si), ²⁴⁰Pu, ²⁴¹Am, ²⁴²Cm(³⁴Si), ²¹⁶Rn(⁸Be), ²²²Fr(¹⁴B), ²²¹Ra(¹³C), ²²³Ra(¹⁵C), ²²²Ac(¹⁴N), (¹⁵N), (¹⁶N), (¹⁷N), ²²⁴Th(¹⁶O), ²²⁵Th(¹⁷O), ²²⁶Th(¹⁸O), ²²⁷Th(¹⁹O), ²²⁸Th(²⁰O), ²²⁹Th(²¹O), ²³⁰Th(²²O), ²³¹Th(²³O), ²²⁸Pa(²⁰F), ²²⁹Pa(²¹F), ²³¹Pa(²³F), ²³¹U(²³Ne), (²⁵Ne); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122597
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023SA02      J.Phys.(London) G50, 015102 (2023)

G.Saxena, M.Aggarwal, D.Singh, A.Jain, P.K.Sharma, H.L.Yadav

Deformation dependence of 2p-radioactivity half-lives: probe with a new formula across the mass region with Z < 82

RADIOACTIVITY ⁶Be, ¹²O, ¹⁶Ne, ¹⁹Mg, ⁴⁵Fe, ⁴⁸Ni, ⁵⁴Zn, ⁶⁷Kr, ¹⁰N, ²⁸Cl, ³²K, ⁵²Cu, ⁵⁷Ga, ^60,62As(2p); analyzed available data; deduced T_1/2 by employing our newly proposed semi-empirical formula wherein the nuclear deformation has been incorporated in a phenomenological way.

doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ac991d
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022SH29      Phys.Scr. 97, 045307 (2022)

R.Sharma, A.Jain, P.K.Sharma, S.K.Jain, G.Saxena

A comprehensive study of decay modes associated with Pb isotopes

RADIOACTIVITY ^{176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,205}Pb(β⁺), (EC), ^{209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266}Pb(β^-), ^{178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193}Pb(α); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac607c
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021JA09      Hyperfine Interactions 242, 60 (2021)

A.Jain, R.Sharma, S.K.Jain, P.K.Sharma, G.Saxena

Cluster radioactivity in ^{294, 296}Og

RADIOACTIVITY ^294,296Og(α), (⁸Be), (¹²C), (¹⁴C), (¹⁶O), (¹⁸O), (²⁰O), (²²Ne), (²⁴Ne), (²⁶Mg), (²⁸Mg), (³⁰Si), (³²Si), (³⁴Si), (³⁶S), (³⁸S), (⁴⁰Ar), (⁴²Ar), (⁴⁴Ar), (⁴⁶Ca), (⁴⁸Ca), (⁵⁰Ca), (⁵²Ti), (⁵⁴Ti), (⁵⁶Cr), (⁵⁸Cr), (⁶⁰Cr), (⁶²Fe), (⁶⁴Fe), (⁶⁶Ni), (⁶⁸Ni), (⁷⁰Ni), (⁷²Zn), (⁷⁴Ge), (⁷⁶Zn), (⁷⁸Ge), (⁸⁰Ge), (⁸²Ge), (⁸⁴Se), (⁸⁶Kr), (⁸⁸Kr), (⁹⁰Sr), (⁹²Kr), (⁹⁴Sr), (⁹⁶Zr), (⁹⁸Zr), (¹⁰⁰Mo), (¹⁰²Mo); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1007/s10751-021-01748-0
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021SA30      J.Phys.(London) G48, 055103 (2021)

G.Saxena, P.K.Sharma, P.Saxena

Modified empirical formulas and machine learning for α-decay systematics

RADIOACTIVITY ^{276,278,280,282,284}Cn, ^{284,285,286,287,288,289}Fl, ^290,292,294Lv, ²⁹⁴Og(α), (SF); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/abcd1c
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021SA59      Phys.Scr. 96, 125304 (2021)

G.Saxena, A.Jain, P.K.Sharma

A new empirical formula for α-decay half-life and decay chains of Z = 120 isotopes

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=50-118; analyzed available data; deduced a new formula (QF) with only 4 coefficients as well as to modify the Tagepera-Nurmia formula with just 3 coefficients (MTNF) by employing nonlinear regressions.

RADIOACTIVITY ^{288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304}120, ^{284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300}Og, ^{280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296}Lv, ^{276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292}Fl, ^{272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288}Cn, ^{268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284}Ds, ^{264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280}Hs, ^{260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276}Sg(α); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac1a4d
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021SH38      Nucl.Phys. A1016, 122318 (2021)

P.K.Sharma, A.Jain, G.Saxena

New modified empirical formulae for favoured and unfavoured α-decay

RADIOACTIVITY ^{305,319,321,331,337}121, ^{294,295,296,298,299,300,301,302,304,306,308,310,311,312,314,316,317,318,320,322,324,326,328,330,331,332,334,336,338,339}122, ³²¹123, ^{300,302,304,306,308,310,312,313,314,316,318,319,320,322,324,326,328,330,332,333,334,336,338}124, ^{291,293,295,297,299,301,303,305,307,309,311,313,315,317,319,321,323,325,327,329,331,333,335,337,339}121, ^{307,309,311,313,315,317,319,321,323,325,327,329,331,333,335,337}122, ^{297,299,301,303,305,307,309,311,313,315,317,319,321,323,325,327,329,331,333,335,337,339}123, ^{301,303,305,307,309,311,313,315,317,319,321,323,325,327,329,331,333,335,337,339}124(α); calculated T_1/2; deduced formulae.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122318
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021SI02      Nucl.Phys. A1006, 122066 (2021)

U.K.Singh, R.Sharma, P.K.Sharma, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, G.Saxena

Structural properties and α-decay chains of transfermium nuclei (101 ≤ Z ≤ 110)

RADIOACTIVITY ^{235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287}Md, ^{238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288}No, ^{241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289}Lr, ^{243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290}Rf, ^{245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291}Db, ^{248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292}Sg, ^{250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293}Bh, ^{253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294}Hs, ^{255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295}Mt, ^{255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296}Ds(α), (SF); calculated potential energy surfaces (PESs), occupancies of neutron single particle states, rms α-decay T_1/2, T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122066
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020LA12      Phys.Rev. C 102, 034613 (2020)

P.V.Laveen, E.Prasad, N.Madhavan, A.K.Nasirov, J.Gehlot, S.Nath, G.Mandaglio, G.Giardina, A.M.Vinodkumar, M.Shareef, A.Shamlath, S.K.Duggi, P.Sandya Devi, T.Banerjee, M.M.Hosamani, Khushboo, P.Jisha, N.Kumar, P.Sharma, T.Varughese

Fusion studies in ^{35, 37}Cl + ¹⁸¹Ta reactions via evaporation residue cross section measurements

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁸¹Ta(³⁵Cl, X), (³⁷Cl, X), E=169.7-236.6 MeV; measured evaporation residues (ERs) using HYbrid Recoil mass Analyzer (HYRA) and position sensitive multiwire proportional counter (MWPC) at the 15-UD Pelletron and superconducting linear accelerator (sc-LINAC) facility of IUAC-New Delhi; deduced σ(E), partial capture, fusion, fast fission and quasifission and total ER cross sections; calculated potential energy surface (PES) of populating ²¹⁶Th compound nucleus as a function of the distance between the interacting nuclei and charge numbers (Z) of the fragments. Comparison with dinuclear system (DNS) model and statistical model calculations.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.034613
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6392.

2020SI27      Nucl.Phys. A1004, 122035 (2020)

U.K.Singh, P.K.Sharma, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, D.T.Akrawy, G.Saxena

Study of decay modes in transfermium isotopes

RADIOACTIVITY ^{245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260}Md, ^{250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262}No, ^{252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266}Lr, ^{253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265}Rf, ^{255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270}Db, ^{258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271}Sg, ^{260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274}Bh, ^{263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277}Hs, ^{266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278}Mt(EC), (β^-), (α), (SF); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122035
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019KH06      Phys.Rev. C 100, 014910 (2019)

A.Khuntia, S.K.Tiwari, P.Sharma, R.Sahoo, T.K.Nayak

Effect of Hagedorn states on isothermal compressibility of hadronic matter formed in heavy-ion collisions: From NICA to LHC energies

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014910
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2018KA31      Acta Phys.Pol. B49, 651 (2018)

G.Kaur, B.R.Behera, A.Jhingan, R.Dubey, T.Banerjee, M.Thakur, R.Mahajan, P.Sharma, Khushboo, N.Saneesh, A.Yadav, K.Kapoor, N.Kumar, K.Rani, P.Sugathan, N.Rowley

Quasi-elastic Scattering in the ⁴⁸Ti+²³²Th Reaction

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²³²Th(⁴⁸Ti, x), E=220-285 MeV; measured reaction products energy, intensity, angle, mainly projectile-like particles using hybrid telescope array; separated pure QuasiElastic (QE) events; deduced barrier distribution, σ(θ); calculated barrier distribution, σ(θ) using coupled channels with deformation, vibration and rotation.

doi: 10.5506/aphyspolb.49.651
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2018MA48      Acta Phys.Pol. B49, 645 (2018)

R.Mahajan, B.R.Behera, M.Thakur, G.Kaur, P.Sharma, K.Kapoor, P.Sugathan, A.Jhingan, A.Chatterjee, N.Saneesh, R.Dubey, A.Yadav, N.Kumar, H.Singh, A.Kumar, A.Saxena, S.Pal

Fission Dynamics of ^{192, 202, 206, 210}Po Compound Nuclei by Neutron Multiplicity Measurements

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^144,154Sm(⁴⁸Ti, x), E^*=72 MeV; measured En, In; deduced neutron yields, double-differential yields, neutron pre and post multiplicities, pre and post temperatures of neutron sources; calculated neutron multiplicities, temperatures using compound nucleus statistical model with the strength of nuclear dissipation as a free parameter. Yields compared with ¹⁹¹Os(¹⁸O, x) and ¹⁹⁴Pt(¹²C, x) reactions at 73.5 and 76.7 MeV, respectively, measured earlier; deduced no specific dependence on the (N-Z)/A of the fissioning nuclei, deduced importance of entrance channels.

doi: 10.5506/aphyspolb.49.645
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2018MA55      Phys.Rev. C 98, 034601 (2018)

R.Mahajan, B.R.Behera, M.Thakur, G.Kaur, P.Sharma, K.Kapoor, A.Kumar, P.Sugathan, A.Jhingan, A.Chatterjee, N.Saneesh, A.Yadav, R.Dubey, N.Kumar, H.Singh, A.Saxena, S.Pal

Systematic study of ^{192, 202, 206, 210}Po compound nuclei using neutron multiplicity as a probe

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁴⁴Sm(⁴⁸Ti, X)¹⁹²Po^*, E=260 MeV; ¹⁵⁴Sm(⁴⁸Ti, X)²⁰²Po^*, E=230 MeV; measured reaction products, time of flight, E(n), I(n), n(fragment)-coin, neutron multiplicity spectra using the NAND array for neutron detection at the 15 UD Pelletron+LINAC facility of IUAC-New Delhi; deduced compound nucleus pre- and post-scission neutron multiplicity and partial fusion σ. ¹⁹⁴Pt(¹²C, X)²⁰⁶Po^*, E^*=76.7 MeV; ¹⁹²Os(¹⁸O, X)²¹⁰Po^*, E^*=73.5 MeV; analyzed compound nucleus pre-scission neutron multiplicity. Comparison with Shell model predictions for ^{192,202,206,210}Po compound nuclei.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.034601
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2018TH03      Phys.Rev. C 98, 014606 (2018)

M.Thakur, B.R.Behera, R.Mahajan, G.Kaur, P.Sharma, K.Kapoor, K.Rani, P.Sugathan, A.Jhingan, N.Saneesh, R.Dubey, A.Yadav, A.Chatterjee, M.B.Chatterjee, N.Kumar, S.Mandal, S.K.Duggi, A.Saxena, S.Kailas, S.Pal

Measurement of mass-gated neutron multiplicity for the ⁴⁸Ti + ²⁰⁸Pb reaction at 57.4 MeV excitation energy

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰⁸Pb(⁴⁸Ti, F)²⁵⁶Rf^*, E=275 MeV; measured fission products, neutrons, (particle)n-coin, angular distributions, double differential neutron multiplicity spectra using position-sensitive multiwire proportional counters (MWPC) for particles and NAND array for neutrons at the 15UD Pelletron-LINAC facility of IUAC-New Delhi; deduced scatter plot of mass and total kinetic energy (TKE) of fission fragments, neutron multiplicity and temperature values, prescission neutron multiplicity. Quasifission (QF) processes investigated through analyses of angular distributions, mass distributions (MD), mass-energy distributions (MED), and mass-angle distributions (MAD) of the fission fragments. Comparison with statistical model calculations.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.014606
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2018TH04      Acta Phys.Pol. B49, 631 (2018)

M.Thakur, B.R.Behera, R.Mahajan, N.Saneesh, G.Kaur, P.Sharma, R.Dubey, K.Kapoor, A.Yadav, N.Kumar, S.Kumar, K.Rani, P.Sugathan, A.Jhingan, A.Chatterjee, M.B.Chatterjee, S.Mandal, A.Saxena, S.Pal, S.Kailas

Fission Dynamics Studies of Near Super-heavy Compound Nucleus ²⁵⁶Rf

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰⁸Pb(⁴⁸Ti, f), E^*=57.4 MeV; measured neutron multiplicity; deduced neutron energy spectra corrected for efficiency of the neutron detectors calculated using statistical code FLUKA at a threshold of 120 keV, spectra come from compound nucleus (pre-scission), fission fragment F1 and the complementary fission fragment F2 (post-scission); calculated double-differential neutron multiplicity spectra and their mechanisms contribution at E=273.1 MeV; fitted to the data; calculated variation of neutron pre-scission multiplicity M^pre_n vs E^*; deduced the value of τ_delay=33 x 10₂₁ from the fit to data of ²³²Th(¹⁹F, f) reaction.

doi: 10.5506/aphyspolb.49.631
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2017KA16      Acta Phys.Pol. B48, 619 (2017)

G.Kaur, B.R.Behera, A.Jhingan, R.Dubey, M.Thakur, P.Sharma, R.Mahajan, T.Banerjee, Khushboo, N.Saneesh, A.Kumar, S.Mandal, B.K.Nayak, A.Saxena, P.Sugathan, N.Rowley

Influence of Positive Q-value Neutron Transfer Coupling on Fusion Enhancement in ²⁸Si+¹⁵⁴Sm Reaction

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁵⁴Sm(²⁸Si, ³⁰Si), E(eff)=85-115 MeV; calculated QE barrier distribution vs E(eff) using CCFULL code with vibrational and rotational couplings for the 2⁺₁ state of ²⁸Si, deformation before and after 2n transfer. Compared with data published by the same group and with calculations for other ²⁸Si reactions.

doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.48.619
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2017KA58      Phys.Rev. C 96, 054605 (2017)

K.Kapoor, S.Verma, P.Sharma, R.Mahajan, N.Kaur, G.Kaur, B.R.Behera, K.P.Singh, A.Kumar, H.Singh, R.Dubey, N.Saneesh, A.Jhingan, P.Sugathan, G.Mohanto, B.K.Nayak, A.Saxena, H.P.Sharma, S.K.Chamoli, I.Mukul, V.Singh

Fission time scale from pre-scission neutron and α multiplicities in the ¹⁶O + ¹⁹⁴Pt reaction

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁹⁴Pt(¹⁶O, X)²¹⁰Rn*, E=98.4 MeV; measured Eα, Iα, fission fragments, (fragments)α-coin, angular distributions using multiwire proportional counters (MWPC) for detection of fission fragments, and an array of CsI detectors for α particles at 15UD Pelletron facility of IUAC-New Delhi; deduced particle identification plot, fission fragments mass ratio distribution, normalized α-particle multiplicity spectra, dissipation energy and dinucleus elongation as function of time and angular momentum, transient times and saddle to scission times. Comparison with statistical model calculations using JOANNE2 code.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054605
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6324.

2017SH33      Phys.Rev. C 96, 034613 (2017)

P.Sharma, B.R.Behera, R.Mahajan, M.Thakur, G.Kaur, K.Kapoor, K.Rani, N.Madhavan, S.Nath, J.Gehlot, R.Dubey, I.Mazumdar, S.M.Patel, M.Dhibar, M.M.Hosamani, Khushboo, N.Kumar, A.Shamlath, G.Mohanto, S.Pal

Evaporation residue cross-section measurements for ⁴⁸Ti-induced reactions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁴²Nd(⁴⁸Ti, X), E(cm)=140.43-202.01 MeV; ¹⁵⁰Nd, (⁴⁸Ti, X), E(cm)=142.18-204.61 MeV; ¹⁴⁴Sm(⁴⁸Ti, X), E(cm)=140.83-202.63 MeV; measured yield of evaporation residues (ERs) from two-dimensional time-of-flight and energy loss spectra, and σ(ER) using gas-filled mode of hybrid recoil mass analyzer (HYRA) at 15UD Pelletron+LINAC accelerator facility of IUAC-New Delhi. Comparison with statistical model calculations, using coupled-channel code CCFULL to obtain spin distribution of the compound nucleus.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.034613
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6320.

2017SH51      Nucl.Phys. A968, 326 (2017)

P.Sharma

Role of nuclear charge change and nuclear recoil on shaking processes and their possible implication on physical processes

ATOMIC PHYSICS ¹⁹F, ⁴⁰Ar; calculated shakeoff probability of WIMP interaction with atomic target vs recoil energy. ²²Ne(α, γ), E not given; calculated atomic process shakeoff probability vs recoil energy. ²⁰Ne(n, n), (n, α), E=5 MeV; calculated shakeoff probability vs WIMP mass.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.08.004
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2017TH04      Eur.Phys.J. A 53, 133 (2017)

M.Thakur, B.R.Behera, R.Mahajan, N.Saneesh, G.Kaur, P.Sharma, R.Dubey, K.Kapoor, A.Yadav, N.Kumar, S.Kumar, K.Rani, P.Sugathan, A.Jhingan, A.Chatterjee, M.B.Chatterjee, S.Mandal, A.Saxena, S.Pal, S.Kailas, A.Nasirov, B.Kayumov

Binary fragmentation based studies for the near super-heavy compound nucleus ²⁵⁶Rf

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰⁸Pb(⁴⁸Ti, x), E=275 MeV; measured fission fragments using MWPCs; deduced intermediate mass fragments mass distribution, TKE; calculated QF (QuasiFission), FF (Fast Fission), DNS (Double Nuclear System) yields separately, especially close to near superheavy ²⁵⁶Rf. Compared to data.

doi: 10.1140/epja/i2017-12323-5
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2016KA10      Acta Phys.Pol. B47, 847 (2016)

G.Kaur, B.R.Behera, A.Jhingan, B.K.Nayak, R.Dubey, P.Sharma, M.Thakur, R.Mahajan, N.Saneesh, T.Banerjee, Khushboo, A.Kumar, S.Mandal, A.Saxena, P.Sugathan, N.Rowley

Measurement of Quasi-elastic Scattering: to Probe ²⁸Si+¹⁵⁴Sm Reaction

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁵⁴Sm(²⁸Si, ²⁸Si), E=118 MeV; measured reaction products; deduced quasi-elastic σ, experimental barrier distribution.

doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.47.847
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2016KA39      Phys.Rev. C 94, 034613 (2016)

G.Kaur, B.R.Behera, A.Jhingan, B.K.Nayak, R.Dubey, P.Sharma, M.Thakur, R.Mahajan, N.Saneesh, T.Banerjee, Khushboo, A.Kumar, S.Mandal, A.Saxena, P.Sugathan, N.Rowley

Effect of coupling in the ²⁸Si + ¹⁵⁴Sm reaction studied by quasi-elastic scattering

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁵⁴Sm(²⁸Si, X), E=90.0-135.0 MeV; measured projectile-like fragments using ΔE-E hybrid telescope detector at IUAC 15UD Pelletron accelerator facility; deduced quasi-elastic σ(E) and corresponding barrier distribution, influence of couplings to excited states in ²⁸Si projectile and in ¹⁵⁴Sm target on fusion σ. Comparison with ¹⁵⁴Sm(¹⁶O, X) data, and with coupled-channels predictions.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.034613
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2016RA19      Phys.Rev. C 93, 054622 (2016)

T.Rajbongshi, K.Kalita, S.Nath, J.Gehlot, T.Banerjee, I.Mukul, R.Dubey, N.Madhavan, C.J.Lin, A.Shamlath, P.V.Laveen, M.Shareef, N.Kumar, P.Jisha, P.Sharma

Deformation effects on sub-barrier fusion cross sections in ¹⁶O + ^{174, 176}Yb

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^174,176Yb(¹⁶O, X), E=64.6-103.6 MeV; measured evaporation residues (ER), scatter plots between ΔE and TOF of the events, fusion σ(E) using HIRA recoil mass spectrometer at IUAC-New Delhi; deduced barrier distribution, hexadecapole deformation parameter (β₄). Comparison with coupled-Channel calculations using CCFULL code.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054622
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6275.

2015SA16      Phys.Rev. C 91, 044621 (2015)

R.Sandal, B.R.Behera, V.Singh, M.Kaur, A.Kumar, G.Kaur, P.Sharma, N.Madhavan, S.Nath, J.Gehlot, A.Jhingan, K.S.Golda, H.Singh, S.Mandal, S.Verma, E.Prasad, K.M.Varier, A.M.Vinodkumar, A.Saxena, J.Sadhukhan, S.Pal

Probing nuclear dissipation via evaporation residue excitation functions for the ^{16, 18}O+¹⁹⁸Pt reactions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁹⁸Pt(¹⁶O, ¹⁶O), (¹⁶O, X)²¹⁴Rn*, E=78.0-105.6 MeV; ¹⁹⁸Pt(¹⁸O, ¹⁸O), (¹⁸O, X)²¹⁶Rn*, E=77.8-105.4; measured evaporation residues (ER), scattered ^16,18O spectra, TOF spectrum, angular distributions of ERs, σ(E) for ERs and fusion using HYRA analyzer at IUAC-New Delhi 15 UD Pelletron facility. Comparison with statistical model calculations of compound nuclear decay with Kramers' fission width.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.044621
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6263.

2015SH26      Nucl.Phys. A941, 265 (2015)

P.Sharma, T.Nandi

Theoretical studies on shaking processes in nuclear transfer reactions

ATOMIC PHYSICS ⁵⁶Fe(¹²C, ⁸Be), E not given; calculated electron shaking probabilities for various atomic shells.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.07.006
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2007AN01      Pramana 68, 105 (2007)

A.Ansari, P.Sharma, U.R.Jakhar, H.L.Yadav

Shape evolution in ^{76, 78}Kr nuclei at high spins in tilted axis cranking Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approach

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ^76,78Kr; calculated rotational band level energies, deformation parameters, configurations. Tilted-axis cranking model.

doi: 10.1007/s12043-007-0012-x
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Note: The following list of authors and aliases matches the search parameter P.Sharma: , P.K.SHARMA