NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = M.Kaushik Found 29 matches. 2022MA13 Nucl.Phys. A1021, 122421 (2022) I.Majeed Bhat, Mohd.S.M.S.Asnain, V.R.Sharma, A.Yadav, M.K.Sharma, P.P.Singh, D.P.Singh, U.Gupta, R.N.Sahoo, A.Sood, M.Kaushik, R.Kumar, B.P.Singh, R.Prasad Effect of projectile structure on break-up fusion for 14N + 175Lu system at intermediate energies NUCLEAR REACTIONS 175Lu(14N, X)184Pt/185Pt/186Pt/183Ir/184Ir/185Ir/182Os/183Os/181Re/177W/178Ta, E=87.11 MeV; measured reaction products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced σ. Comparison with PACE4 predictions. The Inter University Accelerator, New Delhi, India.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122421
2022MA25 Phys.Rev. C 105, 054607 (2022) I.Majeed Bhat, M.Shuaib, M.S.Asnain, M.K.Sharma, A.Yadav, V.R.Sharma, P.P.Singh, D.P.Singh, S.Gupta, U.Gupta, R.N.Sahoo, A.Sood, M.Kaushik, S.Kumar, R.Kumar, B.P.Singh, R.Prasad Role of precursor nuclei in heavy-ion induced reactions at low energies NUCLEAR REACTIONS 175Lu(14N, 4np), E=79.68, 87.11 MeV; 159Tb(12C, 3np), E=69.15, 77.77 MeV; 159Tb(13C, 4np), E=77.87, 84.59 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ; deduced σ(E). Separated yields of the isotope produced in the direct reaction from feeding caused by decay of the isotopes from other channels. Pelletron accelerator facility of the Inter-University Accelerator Centre(IUAC), New Delhi. comparison to theoretical estimations. RADIOACTIVITY 184Pt(β+), (EC) [from 175Lu(14N, 5n), E=79.68, 87.11 MeV]; 167Lu(EC) [from 159Tb(13C, 5n), E=77.87, 84.59 MeV; 159Tb(12C, 4n), E=69.15, 77.77 MeV]; measured Eγ, Iγ; deduced T1/2. Comparison to other experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.054607
2021AS08 Phys.Rev. C 104, 034616 (2021) M.S.Asnain, M.Shuaib, I.Majeed, M.K.Sharma, V.R.Sharma, A.Yadav, D.P.Singh, P.P.Singh, U.Gupta, R.N.Sahoo, A.Sood, M.Kaushik, S.Kumar, R.Kumar, B.P.Singh, R.Prasad Effect of non-α-cluster projectile on incomplete-fusion dynamics: Experimental study of the 14N + 181Ta NUCLEAR REACTIONS 181Ta(14N, 3n)192Hg, (14N, 4n)191Hg/191mHg, (14N, 5n)190Hg, (14N, 6n)189Hg/189mHg, (14N, 3np)191Au, (14N, 4np)190Au, (14N, 5np)189Au/189mAu, (14N, 2nα)189Pt, (14N, 4nα)187Pt, (14N, 5nα)186Pt, (14N, 3npα)187Ir, (14N, 4npα)186Ir/186mIr, (14N, 5npα)185Ir, (14N, 4n2α)183Os, (14N, 5np2α)181Re, E=65.53, 67.50, 69.47, 71.54, 73.65, 75.65, 77.08, 79.51, 81.42, 83.05, 85.17, 87.07 MeV; measured off-line Eγ, Iγ, σ(E) for radio-nuclides populated via complete fusion (CF) and/or incomplete fusion (ICF processes) by activation method at the ion-beam facility of the IUAC-New Delhi; deduced total fusion, total complete fusion, and total incomplete fusion σ(E). Comparison with statistical model calculations using PACE4 code. 190Hg; measured nominal half-life from γ-decay curves as an example for the purpose of correct identification of different radioactive nuclei produced through various reaction channels.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.034616
2021KA37 Phys.Rev. C 104, 024615 (2021) M.Kaushik, S.K.Pandit, V.V.Parkar, G.Gupta, S.Thakur, V.Nanal, H.Krishnamoorthy, A.Shrivastava, C.S.Palshetkar, K.Mahata, K.Ramachandran, S.Pal, R.G.Pillay, P.P.Singh Investigating neutron transfer in the 9Be + 197Au system NUCLEAR REACTIONS 197Au(9Be, 8Be)198Au, (9Be, 10Be)196Au, (9Be, X)199Tl/200Tl/201Bi/202Bi/203Bi, E=30-47 MeV from BARC-TIFR Pelletron Linac Facility, Mumbai; measured off-line Eγ, Iγ from the irradiated target; deduced σ(E) for one-neutron stripping and pickup reactions, complete-fusion (CF) and incomplete fusion (ICF). Comparison with coupled-reaction channel (CRC) calculations. 197Au(6Li, 5Li), (6Li, 7Li), (7Li, 6Li), (7Li, 5Li), (6Li, X), (7Li, X), E(cm)=20-44 MeV; analyzed previous data for σ(E) for n-transfer, CF and ICF using CRC calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024615
2021KA41 Eur.Phys.J. A 57, 320 (2021) M.Kaushik, G.Gupta, V.V.Parkar, S.K.Pandit, S.Thakur, V.Nanal, A.Shrivastava, R.G.Pillay, H.Krishnamoorthy, K.Mahata, S.Pal, C.S.Palshetkar, K.Ramachandran, P.P.Singh Neutron transfer in 9Be + 159Tb system NUCLEAR REACTIONS 159Tb(9Be, X)160Tb, E=30-47 MeV; measured reaction products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced σ. Comparison with calculations.
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00627-0
2021SH29 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E30, 2150070 (2021) R.Sharma, A.Jain, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, G.Saxena Structural properties of nuclei with semi-magic number N(Z)=40 NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 56S, 58Ar, 60Ca, 62Ti, 64Cr, 66Fe, 68Ni, 70Zn, 72Ge, 74Se, 76Kr, 78Sr, 80Zr, 82Mo, 84Ru, 86Pd, 78,80,82,84,86,88,90,92,94,96,98,100,102,104,106,108,110,112,114,116,118,120,122,124Zr; calculated binding energies, deformation parameters.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301321500701
2021SI02 Nucl.Phys. A1006, 122066 (2021) U.K.Singh, R.Sharma, P.K.Sharma, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, G.Saxena Structural properties and α-decay chains of transfermium nuclei (101 ≤ Z ≤ 110) RADIOACTIVITY 235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287Md, 238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288No, 241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289Lr, 243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290Rf, 245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291Db, 248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292Sg, 250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293Bh, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294Hs, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295Mt, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296Ds(α), (SF); calculated potential energy surfaces (PESs), occupancies of neutron single particle states, rms α-decay T1/2, T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122066
2020KA19 Phys.Rev. C 101, 034611 (2020) M.Kaushik, G.Gupta, S.Thakur, H.Krishnamoorthy, PushpendraP.Singh, V.V.Parkar, V.Nanal, A.Shrivastava, R.G.Pillay, K.Mahata, K.Ramachandran, S.Pal, C.S.Palshetkar, S.K.Pandit Fusion of the Borromean nucleus 9Be with a 197Au target at near-barrier energies NUCLEAR REACTIONS 197Au(9Be, 3n), (9Be, 4n), E=33-46.7 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, evaporation residue σ(E) by off-beam γ counting method at the Pelletron Linac facility of BARC-TIFR. Comparison with theoretical calculations using CCFULL code, and previous experimental data for excitation functions of other weakly bound projectiles of 4,6,8He, 6,7Li, 9,11Be on 197Au target.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034611
2020KU26 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E29, 2050068 (2020) M.Kumawat, G.Saxena, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, J.K.Deegwal, M.Aggarwal Novel feature of doubly bubble nuclei in 50 ≤ Z(N) ≤ 82 region along with magicity and weakly bound structure NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=50-82; calculated the separation energies, s.p. energies, pairing energies, proton and neutron density profiles along with deformations of even-even nuclei using the Relativistic Mean-Field (RMF) approach; deduced central density depletion in both proton and neutron named as doubly bubble nuclei.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301320500688
2020SA32 Phys.Rev. C 102, 024615 (2020) R.N.Sahoo, M.Kaushik, A.Sood, A.Sharma, S.Thakur, Pa.Kumar, M.M.Shaikh, R.Biswas, A.Yadav, M.K.Sharma, J.Gehlot, S.Nath, N.Madhavan, R.G.Pillay, E.M.Kozulin, G.N.Knyazheva, K.V.Novikov, P.P.Singh Role of neutron transfer in sub-barrier fusion NUCLEAR REACTIONS 130Te(35Cl, X), E(cm)=94.0, 95.6, 97.2, 98.8, 100.3, 101.9, 103.5, 105.0 MeV; measured evaporation residues (ERs), ΔE-time spectra, fusion σ(E) using recoil mass separator HIRA at IUAC-New Delhi accelerator facility. Comparison with experimental fusion σ(E) data for 130Te(37Cl, X), and other systems. Coupled-channels analysis using CCFULL code.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024615
2020SI27 Nucl.Phys. A1004, 122035 (2020) U.K.Singh, P.K.Sharma, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, D.T.Akrawy, G.Saxena Study of decay modes in transfermium isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260Md, 250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262No, 252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266Lr, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265Rf, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270Db, 258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271Sg, 260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274Bh, 263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277Hs, 266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278Mt(EC), (β-), (α), (SF); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122035
2019AG14 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E28, 1950099 (2019) M.Aggarwal, M.Kaushik, G.Saxena High spin states of Zr isotopes around A=80 mass region- study on cold and hot rotating nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124Zr; calculated ground state quadrupole deformation, parameters, high-spin states, proton and neutron pairing gaps, moments of inertia.
doi: 10.1142/S021830131950099X
2019SA02 Phys.Lett. B 788, 1 (2019) G.Saxena, M.Kumawat, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, M.Aggarwal Bubble structure in magic nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24O, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70Ca, 48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98Ni, 80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150Zr, 78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126Sn, 178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262Pb, 251Fr, 299Mc, 302Og, 22Si, 34Si, 46Ar, 56S, 58Ar, 184Ce, 347119, 292120, 341Nh; calculated charge and matter densities, single particle levels and depletion fraction (DF) across the periodic chart; deduced that the central depletion is correlated to shell structure and occurs due to unoccupancy in s-orbit (2s, 3s, 4s) and inversion of (2s, 1d) and (3s, 1h) states in nuclei upto Z less or equal to 82. Bubble effect in superheavy region is a signature of the interplay between the Coulomb and nn-interaction where the depletion fraction is found to increase with Z (Coulomb repulsion) and decrease with isospin.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.08.076
2019SA15 Nucl.Phys. A983, 145 (2019) R.N.Sahoo, M.Kaushik, A.Sood, P.Kumar, V.R.Sharma, A.Yadav, P.P.Singh, M.K.Sharma, R.Kumar, B.P.Singh, S.Aydin, R.Prasad Insights into the low energy incomplete fusion NUCLEAR REACTIONS 169Tm(12C, x), E(cm)=52.98 - 89.25 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ(t); deduced production σ of evaporation residues. 169Tm(12C, x), E=52.98 - 89.25 MeV;160Gd(12C, x), Ei(cm)=83.7 MeV;103Rh(16O, x), 159Tb(16O, x), E not given; calculated ER production σ using PACE4 and with different level density parameters and using CCFULL; deduced potential parameters, radius parameter from the fit to the data, variation of incomplete fusion fraction with neutron skin thickness and with angular momentum.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.12.013
2019SA17 Phys.Rev. C 99, 024607 (2019) R.N.Sahoo, M.Kaushik, A.Sood, P.Kumar, A.Sharma, S.Thakur, P.P.Singh, P.K.Raina, M.M.Shaikh, R.Biswas, A.Yadav, J.Gehlot, S.Nath, N.Madhavan, V.Srivastava, M.K.Sharma, B.P.Singh, R.Prasad, A.Rani, A.Banerjee, U.Gupta, N.K.Deb, B.J.Roy Sub-barrier fusion in the 37Cl + 130Te system NUCLEAR REACTIONS 130Te(37Cl, X), E=121-155 MeV; measured reaction products, evaporation residues, time of flight of evaporation residue, fusion σ(E) using the HIRA recoil mass spectrometer at the 15UD Pelletron accelerator of IUAC-New Delhi; deduced fusion barrier distributions, astrophysical S factor, logarithmic derivative L(E) factor. Comparison with coupled-channels code calculations using CCFULL code. Systematics of reduced fusion excitation functions of 37Cl projectiles on 58,60,62,64Ni, 130Te targets at sub-barrier energies.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.024607
2018KU17 Can.J.Phys. 96, 1413 (2018) M.Kumawat, G.Saxena, M.Kaushik, R.Sharma, S.K.Jain Description of nuclei with magic number Z (N) = 6 NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=6, N=6; calculated ground state properties of entire chains of isotopes (isotones) with Z (N) = 6 including even and odd mass nuclei using relativistic mean-field plus BCS, including quadrupole deformation, binding energy, separation energy, single particle energy, root mean squared radii, along with charge and neutron density profile. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1139/cjp-2017-1013
2018SA38 Acta Phys.Pol. B49, 585 (2018) R.N.Sahoo, M.Kaushik, A.Sood, P.Kumar, V.R.Sharma, A.Yadav, M.Shuaib, D.P.Singh, P.P.Singh, U.Gupta, M.K.Sharma, R.Kumar, B.P.Singh, S.Aydin, H.J.Wollersheim, R.Prasad Entrance Channel Effect on Incomplete Fusion NUCLEAR REACTIONS 169Tm(12C, x), E=5-7.5 MeV/nucleon; measured evaporation residues (ER) Eγ, Iγ(time); deduced 177Re σER; calculated σER using statistical model code PACE-IV with different level density parameter; calculated total (summed over all ERs) σT, complete and incomplete fusion σCF, σICF. 103Rh, 115In, 159Tb, 169Tm, 197Au(12C, x), E not given;103Rh, 159Tb, 169Tm(16O, x), E not given; measured reaction products Eγ, Iγ; deduced incomplete fusion fraction vs mass asymmetry (relative projectile-target velocity close to 0.05c vs asymmetry).
doi: 10.5506/aphyspolb.49.585
2018SA44 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E27, 1850074 (2018) G.Saxena, U.K.Singh, M.Kumawat, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, M.Aggarwal Distinct ground state features and the decay chains of Z=121 superheavy nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=121; calculated separation energies, shell corrections, deformation parameters, radial variation of charge density and neutron density using RMF+BCS approach. RADIOACTIVITY 293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312121(α); calculated Q-values, T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S021830131850074X
2017SA09 Acta Phys.Pol. B48, 309 (2017) Study of N = 16 Shell Closure Within RMF+BCS Approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 22C, 24O, 26Ne, 28Mg, 30Si, 32S, 34Ar, 36Ca; calculated low-lying sp levels, J, π for N=16 isotones vs Z using RMF+BCS approach; deduced shell gap development. 10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24C, 12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26O; calculated pairing energy, two neutron shell gap using BCS+RMF(TMA) approach.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.48.309
2017SA33 Phys.Atomic Nuclei 80, 211 (2017) Ground-state properties of neutron magic nuclei
doi: 10.1134/s1063778817020259
2017SA46 Chin.J.Phys.(Taiwan) 55, 1149 (2017) Behaviour of the pf shell under the RMF+BCS description NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 52,60Ca, 48Si, 84,116Se; calculated two neutron shell gaps, neutron single particle states, occupancy, quadrupole deformation parameters; deduced magicity. RMF+BCS approach.
doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2017.03.022
2017SA69 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E26, 1750072 (2017) G.Saxena, M.Kumawat, M.Kaushik, U.K.Singh, S.K.Jain, S.Somorendro Singh, M.Aggarwal Implications of occupancy of 2s1/2 state in sd-shell within RMF+BCS approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 22C, 22,24O, 34,36Ca, 26S, 36S, 56S, 22,34,48Si; calculated quadrupole deformation parameters, neutron single particle states, neutron density. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301317500720
2017SA70 Phys.Lett. B 775, 126 (2017) G.Saxena, M.Kumawat, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, M.Aggarwal Two-proton radioactivity with 2p halo in light mass nuclei A = 18-34 NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 19Mg, 22Si, 26S, 30Ar, 34Ca; calculated variation of charge density, charge radii, RMF potential energy, centrifugal barrier energy for proton resonant states; deduced 2-proton halo.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.055
2015KA35 Phys.Part. and Nucl.Lett. 24, 516 (2015) High-spin structure of 80Kr NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 80Kr; calculated energy levels, J, π, high-spin states, deformation parameters; deduced prolate deformation. Fully self-consistent cranked HFB approach.
doi: 10.1134/S1547477115040184
2014SA13 Rom.J.Phys. 59, 86 (2014) Weakly Bound Neutron Rich C Isotopes within RMF+BCS Approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 10,12,14,16,18,20,22C; calculated neutron single-particle energies, occupancy, neutron density, RMF potential energy sum, binding and two-neutron separation energies, neutron radii. Relativistic Mean Field calculations, comparison with available data.
2013SA34 Phys.Part. and Nucl.Lett. 10, 220 (2013) Magicity in Exotic Nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52,54,56,58,60,62,64,66Ca; calculated proton and neutron density distributions, two-neutron separation and neutron single-particle energies. Relativistic mean field (RMF) plus state-dependent BCS approach.
doi: 10.1134/S1547477113030114
2004YA23 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E13, 647 (2004) Description of drip-line nuclei within the relativistic mean field plus BCS approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 20O, 62Ca, 84Ni, 138Zr, 150Sn, 250Pb; calculated neutron single-particle energies, configurations. O, Ca, Ni, Zr, Sn, Pb; calculated pairing energies, two-neutron separation energies, density distributions, radii. Relativistic mean field plus BCS approach.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301304002375
2003AN34 Pramana 60, 1171 (2003) A.Ansari, H.L.Yadav, M.Kaushik, U.R.Jakhar High-spin structure of neutron-rich Dy Isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 164,166,168,170Dy; calculated high-spin level energies, g-factors, rotational band features. Cranked Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approach.
doi: 10.1007/BF02704284
2002YA17 Part. and Nucl., Lett. 112, 66 (2002) H.L.Yadav, M.Kaushik, I.R.Jakhar, A.Ansari g Factors as a Probe for High-Spin Structure of Neutron-Rich Dy Isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 164,166,168,170Dy; calculated rotational bands deformation parameters, pair gaps, related features. 160,162,164,166,168,170Dy; calculated rotational bands g factors vs angular momentum. Cranked mean-field approach, comparison with data.
Back to query form |