NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = G.Saxena Found 45 matches. 2024AG02 Nucl.Phys. A1044, 122843 (2024) Correlation between the shape coexistence and stability in Mo and Ru isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144Mo, 83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152Ru; calculated deformation parameters, shell corrections, ground state shape and deformation within the microscopic theoretical framework using Nilsson Strutinsky Method and Relativistic Mean Field Model; deduced energy minima. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2024.122843
2024GH03 J.Phys.(London) G51, 045105 (2024) T.Ghosh, Sangeeta, B.Maheshwari, G.Saxena, B.K.Agrawal Indispensability of cross-shell contributions in neutron resonance spacing NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 24Na, 25,26,27Mg; calculated J and π dependent nuclear level densities (NLDs) for a configuration interaction shell model using a numerically efficient spectral distribution method; deduced the s-wave neutron resonance spacing (D0).
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ad29e9
2024HI02 Chin.Phys.C 48, 024001 (2024) A.Hingu, S.Mukherjee, S.Parashari, A.Sangeeta, A.Gandhi, M.Upadhyay, M.Choudhary, S.Bamal, N.Singh, G.Mishra, S.De, S.Sood, S.Prasad, G.Saxena, A.Kumar, R.G.Thomas, B.K.Agrawal, K.Katovsky, A.Kumar Investigation of 58Ni(n, p)58Co reaction cross-section with covariance analysis NUCLEAR REACTIONS 58Ni(n, p), 115In(n, n'), E=1.7-2.7 MeV; measured reaction products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced σ and correlation matrix. Comparison with EXFOR, ENDF/B-VIII.0, JEFF-3.3, JENDL-4.0, and CENDL-3.2 libraries, TALYS calculations. The Folded Tendem Ion Accelerator (FOTIA) facility at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), Mumbai, India.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad0e5a
2024SA15 Eur.Phys.J. A 60, (2024) G.Saxena, P.K.Sharma, P.Saxena A global study of α-clusters decay in heavy and superheavy nuclei with half-life and preformation factor NUCLEAR STRUCTURE N=100-180; calculated T1/2, preformation factor with microscopic structural information and cast in the form of quite precise empirical formulas.
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01259-w
2023AK06 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E32, 2350026 (2023) D.T.Akrawy, H.C.Manjunatha, G.Saxena, Ali H.Ahmed, N.Sowmya Systematic study of α-decay half-lives for Pa isotopes using MGLDM model RADIOACTIVITY 211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241Pa(α); calculated T1/2 using MYQZR, RoyerA, YQZR, MRenB, Akrawy, SemFIS and AKRE formulas, MGLDM macroscopic model.
doi: 10.1142/S021830132350026X
2023GH04 Eur.Phys.J. A 59, 266 (2023) T.Ghosh, Sangeeta, G.Saxena, B.K.Agrawal, U.Datta Impact of density dependence of symmetry energy on astrophysical S-factor for heavy-ion fusion reactions NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 16,24O, 40,48,54,60Ca, 78Ni, 124,132Sn; analyzed available data; deduced Radial density distributions for neutrons and protons from SLy4 and SkO Skyrme effective interactions. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 40Ca(40Ca, X), 16O(16O, X), 24O(24O, X), 54Ca(54Ca, X), 60Ca(60Ca, X), 78Ni(78Ni, X), 124Sn(124Sn, X), 132Sn(132Sn, X), E(cm)=45-50 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced σ, the maximum barrier height and width obtained by DFM potentials M3Y-Paris without density dependence (PDD0), sub-barrier fusion σ and astrophysical S-factor. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01173-7
2023JA02 Nucl.Phys. A1031, 122597 (2023) A.Jain, P.K.Sharma, S.K.Jain, J.K.Deegwal, G.Saxena Cluster radioactivity in trans-lead region: A systematic study with modified empirical formulas RADIOACTIVITY 221Fr, 221,222,223Ra, 223Ac(14C), 223Ac(15N), 224Ra, 225Ac, 226Ra, 226Th(14C), 228Th(20O), 230Th(24Ne), 230U(22Ne), 231Pa(24Ne), 232Th(24Ne), (26Ne), 232U(24Ne), (28Mg), 233U(24Ne), (25Ne), (28Mg), 234U(24Ne), (26Ne), (28Mg), 235U(24Ne), (25Ne), (28Mg), (29Mg), 236U(24Ne), (26Ne), (28Mg), (30Mg), 236Pu(28Mg), 237Np(30Mg), 238Pu(28Mg), (30Mg), (32Si), 240Pu, 241Am, 242Cm(34Si), 216Rn(8Be), 222Fr(14B), 221Ra(13C), 223Ra(15C), 222Ac(14N), (15N), (16N), (17N), 224Th(16O), 225Th(17O), 226Th(18O), 227Th(19O), 228Th(20O), 229Th(21O), 230Th(22O), 231Th(23O), 228Pa(20F), 229Pa(21F), 231Pa(23F), 231U(23Ne), (25Ne); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122597
2023SA02 J.Phys.(London) G50, 015102 (2023) G.Saxena, M.Aggarwal, D.Singh, A.Jain, P.K.Sharma, H.L.Yadav Deformation dependence of 2p-radioactivity half-lives: probe with a new formula across the mass region with Z < 82 RADIOACTIVITY 6Be, 12O, 16Ne, 19Mg, 45Fe, 48Ni, 54Zn, 67Kr, 10N, 28Cl, 32K, 52Cu, 57Ga, 60,62As(2p); analyzed available data; deduced T1/2 by employing our newly proposed semi-empirical formula wherein the nuclear deformation has been incorporated in a phenomenological way.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ac991d
2023SA35 Eur.Phys.J. A 59, 189 (2023) Cluster radioactivity from trans-tin to superheavy region using an improved empirical formula RADIOACTIVITY 221Fr, 221,222,223Ra, 223Ac(14C), 223Ac(15N), 224Ra, 225Ac, 226Ra(14C), 226Th(18O), 228Th(20O), 230Th(24Ne), 230U(22Ne), 231Pa, 231Pa, 232Th(24Ne), 232Th(26Ne), 232,233U(24Ne), 233U(25Ne), (28Mg), 234U(24Ne), 234U(26Ne), (28Mg), 235U(24Ne), (25Ne), (28Mg), (29Mg), 236U(28Mg), (30Mg), 236Pu(28Mg), 238Pu(30Mg), (32Si), 240Pu, 241Am, 242Cm(34Si), 114Ba(12C), 111,112,113La(13N), 112,113,114,115Ce(17O), 116,117,118Ce(16O), 114,115Pr(15F), 116,117Pr(17F), 116,117,118Nd(18Ne), 121Sm(22Mg), 285Mc, 289Mc(81As), 275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282Lv(80Se), 283,284,285,286,287,288,289Lv(82Se), 290,291Lv(84Se), 279,280,281,282,283,284,285Ts(83Br), 286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293Ts(85Br), 295Ts(87Br), 280Og(84Kr), 281Og(86Kr), 282,283,284Og(84Kr), 285,286,287Og(86Kr), 288Og(84Kr), 289,290,291,292Og(86Kr), 293Og(87Kr), 294Og(86Kr), 295Og(87Kr), 296Og(88Kr), 299Og(91Kr), 287,288120(88Sr), 289120(89Sr), 290,291,292120(88Sr), 293120(90Sr), 294120(88Sr), 295120(89Sr), 296120(90Sr), 297120(89Sr), 298120(90Sr), 299120(91Sr), 300120(92Sr), 301120(93Sr), 302120(94Sr), 303120(95Sr), 304120(96Sr), 305120(94Sr); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01102-8
2022AK06 Eur.Phys.J. A 58, 145 (2022) D.T.Akrawy, A.I.Budaca, G.Saxena, A.H.Ahmed Generalization of the screened universal α-decay law by asymmetry and angular momentum RADIOACTIVITY 106,108Te, 112Xe, 114Ba, 146,148Sm, 148,150,152Gd, 150,152,154Dy, 152,154Er, 154,156Yb, 156,158,160Hf, 158,160,162W, 166W, 162Os, 166Os, 170Os, 174Os, 178,180,182,184Pt, 188,190Pt, 174,176Hg, 180,182,184Hg, 188Hg, 188,190Pb, 210Pb, 190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218Po, 194,196,198,200,202Rn, 206,208,210,212Rn, 218,220,222Rn, 206,208,210,212,214Ra, 220,222,224,226Ra, 210Th, 216,218Th, 222,224,226,228,230,232Th, 224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238U, 230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244Pu, 238,240,242,244,246,248Cm, 240Cf, 244,246,248,250,252,254Cf, 248,250,252,254,256Fm, 252No, 256No, 256,258Rf, 260,262Sg, 264,266Hs, 270Hs, 270Ds, 286,288Fl, 290,292Lv, 294Og, 105,107Te, 109Xe, 147Sm, 151Gd, 151,153Dy, 153,155Er, 155,157Yb, 157Hf, 159W, 165W, 161Os, 167Os, 173Os, 167,169,171,173,175,177Pt, 183Pt, 173,175,177,179Hg, 183,185Hg, 191Pb, 187,189,191Po, 195,197,199,201Po, 205,207,209,211,213Po, 195,197,199,201,203Rn, 207,209,211,213,215Rn, 219,221Rn, 203,205Ra, 209,211,213,215,217,219,221Ra, 211,213,215,217,219,221,223,225,227Th, 217,219U, 223,225U, 235U, 239,241Pu, 241,243,245,247Cm, 249,251Cf, 251,253,255,257Fm, 263Rf, 259,261Sg, 269,271Sg, 265,267Hs, 273Hs, 267Ds, 269,271,273Ds, 277Ds, 281Ds, 281Cn, 285Cn, 287,288,289Fl, 291,293Lv, 111I, 147Eu, 149,151Tb, 153Tm, 169Ir, 177Ir, 173Au, 181,183,185Au, 177,179Tl, 187,189Bi, 193,195Bi, 211,213Bi, 197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211,213,215,217,219At, 201,203,205,207,209,211,213,215,217,219,221,223Fr, 209,211,213,215,217,219,221,223,225,227Ac, 213,215,217,219Pa, 225,227Pa, 231Pa, 235,237Np, 239,241,243Am, 243,245Bk, 249Bk, 243,245Es, 255,257Lr, 257,259Db, 263Db, 261Bh, 267Bh, 275Mt, 279Rg, 283,285Nh, 287,289Mc, 293Ts, 110,112I, 114Cs, 148Eu, 152,154Ho, 154,156Tm, 158Lu, 162Ta, 160,162Re, 166Ir, 170,172,174Au, 182Au, 182Tl, 212,213,214Bi, 196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218At, 200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220Fr, 206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224Ac, 212Pa, 216Pa, 226Pa, 230Pa, 254Es, 256Md, 256,258Db, 260Bh, 264,266Bh, 270,272,274Bh, 268Mt, 274,276,278Mt, 272,274Rg, 278,280Rg, 278Nh, 284,286Nh, 288,290Mc, 294Ts(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00789-5
2022GH01 J.Phys.(London) G49, 25103 (2022) T.Ghosh, B.Maheshwari, Sangeeta, G.Saxena, B.K.Agrawal Nuclear level densities away from line of β-stability NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=10-80; analyzed available data; deduced nuclear level densities, ground-shell corrections, parameters.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ac44ac
2022SA17 Phys.Rev. C 105, 044320 (2022) Sangeeta, T.Ghosh, B.Maheshwari, G.Saxena, B.K.Agrawal Astrophysical reaction rates with realistic nuclear level densities NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 51V, 55Fe, 59Ni; calculated ground-state energies, nuclear level densities. 49,50Ti, 51V, 53Cr, 55,57Fe, 59Ni; calculated S-wave neutron resonances. Ground state properties calculated by using shell-model with the GXPF1A residual interaction. Nuclear level densities obtained within the spectral distribution method (SDM). Comparison to available experimental data and other theoretical calculations. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 50V, 54Fe, 58Ni(n, γ), E(cm)<8 MeV; calculated σ(E), astrophysical reaction rates. TALYS 1.95 calculations using nuclear level densities obtained within the spectral distribution method (SDM). Comparison to experimental data and recommended values from ENDF and KADONIS V0.3.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.044320
2022SH29 Phys.Scr. 97, 045307 (2022) R.Sharma, A.Jain, P.K.Sharma, S.K.Jain, G.Saxena A comprehensive study of decay modes associated with Pb isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,205Pb(β+), (EC), 209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266Pb(β-), 178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193Pb(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac607c
2021JA09 Hyperfine Interactions 242, 60 (2021) A.Jain, R.Sharma, S.K.Jain, P.K.Sharma, G.Saxena Cluster radioactivity in 294, 296Og RADIOACTIVITY 294,296Og(α), (8Be), (12C), (14C), (16O), (18O), (20O), (22Ne), (24Ne), (26Mg), (28Mg), (30Si), (32Si), (34Si), (36S), (38S), (40Ar), (42Ar), (44Ar), (46Ca), (48Ca), (50Ca), (52Ti), (54Ti), (56Cr), (58Cr), (60Cr), (62Fe), (64Fe), (66Ni), (68Ni), (70Ni), (72Zn), (74Ge), (76Zn), (78Ge), (80Ge), (82Ge), (84Se), (86Kr), (88Kr), (90Sr), (92Kr), (94Sr), (96Zr), (98Zr), (100Mo), (102Mo); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1007/s10751-021-01748-0
2021SA30 J.Phys.(London) G48, 055103 (2021) G.Saxena, P.K.Sharma, P.Saxena Modified empirical formulas and machine learning for α-decay systematics RADIOACTIVITY 276,278,280,282,284Cn, 284,285,286,287,288,289Fl, 290,292,294Lv, 294Og(α), (SF); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/abcd1c
2021SA57 J.Phys.(London) G48, 125102 (2021) G.Saxena, M.Kumawat, R.Sharma, M.Aggarwal Collapse of N = 28 magicity in exotic 40Mg-probe of deformed halo and 2n-radioactivity at Mg neutron drip-line NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 40,42,44Mg; calculated neutron separation energies, single particle energies, neutron and proton pairing energy contributions, shell gaps, radial moments, radial density distributions, neutron skin thickness. 40Mg; deduced neutron halo, dineutron correlations.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ac288b
2021SA59 Phys.Scr. 96, 125304 (2021) A new empirical formula for α-decay half-life and decay chains of Z = 120 isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=50-118; analyzed available data; deduced a new formula (QF) with only 4 coefficients as well as to modify the Tagepera-Nurmia formula with just 3 coefficients (MTNF) by employing nonlinear regressions. RADIOACTIVITY 288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304120, 284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300Og, 280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296Lv, 276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292Fl, 272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288Cn, 268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284Ds, 264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280Hs, 260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276Sg(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac1a4d
2021SH29 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E30, 2150070 (2021) R.Sharma, A.Jain, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, G.Saxena Structural properties of nuclei with semi-magic number N(Z)=40 NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 56S, 58Ar, 60Ca, 62Ti, 64Cr, 66Fe, 68Ni, 70Zn, 72Ge, 74Se, 76Kr, 78Sr, 80Zr, 82Mo, 84Ru, 86Pd, 78,80,82,84,86,88,90,92,94,96,98,100,102,104,106,108,110,112,114,116,118,120,122,124Zr; calculated binding energies, deformation parameters.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301321500701
2021SH38 Nucl.Phys. A1016, 122318 (2021) New modified empirical formulae for favoured and unfavoured α-decay RADIOACTIVITY 305,319,321,331,337121, 294,295,296,298,299,300,301,302,304,306,308,310,311,312,314,316,317,318,320,322,324,326,328,330,331,332,334,336,338,339122, 321123, 300,302,304,306,308,310,312,313,314,316,318,319,320,322,324,326,328,330,332,333,334,336,338124, 291,293,295,297,299,301,303,305,307,309,311,313,315,317,319,321,323,325,327,329,331,333,335,337,339121, 307,309,311,313,315,317,319,321,323,325,327,329,331,333,335,337122, 297,299,301,303,305,307,309,311,313,315,317,319,321,323,325,327,329,331,333,335,337,339123, 301,303,305,307,309,311,313,315,317,319,321,323,325,327,329,331,333,335,337,339124(α); calculated T1/2; deduced formulae.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122318
2021SH43 Hyperfine Interactions 242, 35 (2021) R.Sharma, A.Jain, S.K.Jain, G.Saxena Magicity in the nuclei with N = 32 and 34 NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 46,48Si, 48,50S, 50,52Ar, 52,54Ca, 54,56Ti, 56,58Cr, 58,60Fe, 60,62Ni, 62,64Zn, 64,66Ge, 66,68Se, 68,70Kr; analyzed available data; calculated potential energy surfaces, quadrupole deformation parameters, two proton shell gap, isotopic shift using relativistic mean-field (RMF) approach with density-dependent meson-nucleon couplings using DD-ME2 parameter.
doi: 10.1007/s10751-021-01751-5
2021SI02 Nucl.Phys. A1006, 122066 (2021) U.K.Singh, R.Sharma, P.K.Sharma, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, G.Saxena Structural properties and α-decay chains of transfermium nuclei (101 ≤ Z ≤ 110) RADIOACTIVITY 235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287Md, 238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288No, 241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289Lr, 243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290Rf, 245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291Db, 248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292Sg, 250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293Bh, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294Hs, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295Mt, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296Ds(α), (SF); calculated potential energy surfaces (PESs), occupancies of neutron single particle states, rms α-decay T1/2, T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122066
2020KU26 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E29, 2050068 (2020) M.Kumawat, G.Saxena, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, J.K.Deegwal, M.Aggarwal Novel feature of doubly bubble nuclei in 50 ≤ Z(N) ≤ 82 region along with magicity and weakly bound structure NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=50-82; calculated the separation energies, s.p. energies, pairing energies, proton and neutron density profiles along with deformations of even-even nuclei using the Relativistic Mean-Field (RMF) approach; deduced central density depletion in both proton and neutron named as doubly bubble nuclei.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301320500688
2020SI27 Nucl.Phys. A1004, 122035 (2020) U.K.Singh, P.K.Sharma, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, D.T.Akrawy, G.Saxena Study of decay modes in transfermium isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260Md, 250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262No, 252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266Lr, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265Rf, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270Db, 258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271Sg, 260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274Bh, 263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277Hs, 266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278Mt(EC), (β-), (α), (SF); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122035
2019AG14 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E28, 1950099 (2019) M.Aggarwal, M.Kaushik, G.Saxena High spin states of Zr isotopes around A=80 mass region- study on cold and hot rotating nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124Zr; calculated ground state quadrupole deformation, parameters, high-spin states, proton and neutron pairing gaps, moments of inertia.
doi: 10.1142/S021830131950099X
2019SA02 Phys.Lett. B 788, 1 (2019) G.Saxena, M.Kumawat, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, M.Aggarwal Bubble structure in magic nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24O, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70Ca, 48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98Ni, 80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150Zr, 78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126Sn, 178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262Pb, 251Fr, 299Mc, 302Og, 22Si, 34Si, 46Ar, 56S, 58Ar, 184Ce, 347119, 292120, 341Nh; calculated charge and matter densities, single particle levels and depletion fraction (DF) across the periodic chart; deduced that the central depletion is correlated to shell structure and occurs due to unoccupancy in s-orbit (2s, 3s, 4s) and inversion of (2s, 1d) and (3s, 1h) states in nuclei upto Z less or equal to 82. Bubble effect in superheavy region is a signature of the interplay between the Coulomb and nn-interaction where the depletion fraction is found to increase with Z (Coulomb repulsion) and decrease with isospin.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.08.076
2019SA08 Phys.Lett. B 789, 323 (2019) G.Saxena, M.Kumawat, B.K.Agrawal, M.Aggarwal Anti-bubble effect of temperature and deformation: A systematic study for nuclei across all mass regions between A=20-300 NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 22,34Si, 46,58Ar, 56S, 184Ce, 294,302Og, 292120, 22O, 34Ca, 24Ne, 40Mg, 44S, 32Ar; calculated charge and neutron densities as function of temperatures, proton single-particle energies, nuclear charge form factors, depletion fractions, quadrupole deformation parameters, occupation probabilities.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.062
2019SA25 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E28, 1950008 (2019) G.Saxena, M.Kumawat, S.Somorendro Singh, M.Aggarwal Structural properties and decay modes of Z = 122, 120 and 118 superheavy nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299Og, 290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305120, 298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312,313,314122; calculated neutron and charge densities, ground state properties viz. binding energies, charge, proton, neutron, matter radii. RADIOACTIVITY 272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288Cn, 276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292Fl, 280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296Lv, 284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300Og, 288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304120, 292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308122(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301319500083
2019SA45 J.Phys.(London) G46, 065105 (2019) G.Saxena, M.Kumawat, B.K.Agrawal, M.Aggarwal A systematic study of the factors affecting central depletion in nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 30Ne, 32Mg, 34Si, 46Ar, 56S, 58Ar; calculated bubble parameters, proton single-particle energies, binding energies.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ab0853
2019SA50 Hyperfine Interactions 240, 74 (2019) G.Saxena, M.Kumawat, B.K.Agrawal, M.Aggarwal Effect of quadrupole deformation and temperature on bubble structure in N=14 nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 24Ne, 32Ar; calculated quadrupole deformation parameters, proton occupation probability using the relativistic mean-field plus BCS approach using NL3* and PK1 parameters.
doi: 10.1007/s10751-019-1620-9
2019SA58 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E28, 1950101 (2019) G.Saxena, M.Kumawat, M.Aggarwal Search for exotic features in the ground state light nuclei with 10≤Z≤18 from stable valley to drip lines NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52Ne, 18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52,54Mg, 20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52,54,56Si, 22,24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52,54,56,58S, 24,26,28,30,32,34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52,54,56,58,60Ar; calculated two neutron separation energy, charge and neutron radii, neutron density and skin, charge form factor, deformation parameters, potential energy surface as a function of the deformation parameter, ground state properties.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301319501015
2018AG06 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E27, 1850062 (2018) Persistence of magicity in neutron-rich exotic 78Ni in ground as well as excited states NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 70Ca, 72Ti, 74Cr, 76Fe, 78Ni; calculated charge distribution along with radius, pairing energy contributions from protons and neutrons, neutron and proton single-particle energies for Ni isotopes, two-neutron shell gaps, level density parameter versus mass number A for Ni isotopes at different temperatures, entropy versus mass number A for Ni isotopes at different temperatures, rotational states. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301318500623
2018KU17 Can.J.Phys. 96, 1413 (2018) M.Kumawat, G.Saxena, M.Kaushik, R.Sharma, S.K.Jain Description of nuclei with magic number Z (N) = 6 NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=6, N=6; calculated ground state properties of entire chains of isotopes (isotones) with Z (N) = 6 including even and odd mass nuclei using relativistic mean-field plus BCS, including quadrupole deformation, binding energy, separation energy, single particle energy, root mean squared radii, along with charge and neutron density profile. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1139/cjp-2017-1013
2018SA44 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E27, 1850074 (2018) G.Saxena, U.K.Singh, M.Kumawat, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, M.Aggarwal Distinct ground state features and the decay chains of Z=121 superheavy nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=121; calculated separation energies, shell corrections, deformation parameters, radial variation of charge density and neutron density using RMF+BCS approach. RADIOACTIVITY 293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312121(α); calculated Q-values, T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S021830131850074X
2017SA09 Acta Phys.Pol. B48, 309 (2017) Study of N = 16 Shell Closure Within RMF+BCS Approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 22C, 24O, 26Ne, 28Mg, 30Si, 32S, 34Ar, 36Ca; calculated low-lying sp levels, J, π for N=16 isotones vs Z using RMF+BCS approach; deduced shell gap development. 10,12,14,16,18,20,22,24C, 12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26O; calculated pairing energy, two neutron shell gap using BCS+RMF(TMA) approach.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.48.309
2017SA33 Phys.Atomic Nuclei 80, 211 (2017) Ground-state properties of neutron magic nuclei
doi: 10.1134/s1063778817020259
2017SA46 Chin.J.Phys.(Taiwan) 55, 1149 (2017) Behaviour of the pf shell under the RMF+BCS description NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 52,60Ca, 48Si, 84,116Se; calculated two neutron shell gaps, neutron single particle states, occupancy, quadrupole deformation parameters; deduced magicity. RMF+BCS approach.
doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2017.03.022
2017SA69 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E26, 1750072 (2017) G.Saxena, M.Kumawat, M.Kaushik, U.K.Singh, S.K.Jain, S.Somorendro Singh, M.Aggarwal Implications of occupancy of 2s1/2 state in sd-shell within RMF+BCS approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 22C, 22,24O, 34,36Ca, 26S, 36S, 56S, 22,34,48Si; calculated quadrupole deformation parameters, neutron single particle states, neutron density. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301317500720
2017SA70 Phys.Lett. B 775, 126 (2017) G.Saxena, M.Kumawat, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, M.Aggarwal Two-proton radioactivity with 2p halo in light mass nuclei A = 18-34 NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 19Mg, 22Si, 26S, 30Ar, 34Ca; calculated variation of charge density, charge radii, RMF potential energy, centrifugal barrier energy for proton resonant states; deduced 2-proton halo.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.055
2015KA35 Phys.Part. and Nucl.Lett. 24, 516 (2015) High-spin structure of 80Kr NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 80Kr; calculated energy levels, J, π, high-spin states, deformation parameters; deduced prolate deformation. Fully self-consistent cranked HFB approach.
doi: 10.1134/S1547477115040184
2014SA13 Rom.J.Phys. 59, 86 (2014) Weakly Bound Neutron Rich C Isotopes within RMF+BCS Approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 10,12,14,16,18,20,22C; calculated neutron single-particle energies, occupancy, neutron density, RMF potential energy sum, binding and two-neutron separation energies, neutron radii. Relativistic Mean Field calculations, comparison with available data.
2013SA25 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E22, 1350025 (2013); Erratum Int.J.Mod.Phys. E22, 1392002 (2013) Study of neutron magic drip-line nuclei within relativistic mean-field plus BCS approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 46Fe, 58Zn, 96Pd, 154Hf, 220Pu; calculated two proton separation energy, proton single particle energy and occupancy, RMF potential energy plots (sum of the scalar and vector potentials). Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301313500250
2013SA26 J.Exper.Theo.Phys. 116, 567 (2013) Shell Closures, Loosely Bound Structures, and Halos in Exotic Nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=6, 14, 16, 34;N=6, 14, 16, 34, 40, 70, 112; calculated single-particle spectrum, pairing energies, and densities of the nuclei; deduced shell closure. Relativistic mean-field (RMF) plus state-dependent BCS approach, comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1134/S1063776113040092
2013SA34 Phys.Part. and Nucl.Lett. 10, 220 (2013) Magicity in Exotic Nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52,54,56,58,60,62,64,66Ca; calculated proton and neutron density distributions, two-neutron separation and neutron single-particle energies. Relativistic mean field (RMF) plus state-dependent BCS approach.
doi: 10.1134/S1547477113030114
2012SI16 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E21, 1250076 (2012); Erratum Int.J.Mod.Phys. E22, 1392001 (2013) Study of two-proton radioactivity within the relativistic mean-field plus BCS approach RADIOACTIVITY 38Ti, 42Cr, 45Fe, 48Ni, 55Zn, 60Ge, 63,64Se, 68Kr, 72Sr, 76Zr(2p); calculated one- and two-proton separation energies, quadrupole deformation parameters, pairing gap, radial wave functions and density distributions. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301312500760
1971SA16 Can.J.Phys. 49, 2276 (1971) ENDOR of the 55Mn2+ Ion in MgO and CaO NUCLEAR MOMENTS 55Mn; measured a, b; deduced μ. ENDOR.
doi: 10.1139/p71-275
Back to query form Note: The following list of authors and aliases matches the search parameter G.Saxena: , G.P.SAXENA |