NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = M.Gennari Found 8 matches. 2023CA17 Eur.Phys.J. A 59, 273 (2023) P.Capel, D.R.Phillips, A.Andis, M.Bagnarol, B.Behzadmoghaddam, F.Bonaiti, R.Bubna, Y.Capitani, P.-Y.Duerinck, V.Durant, N.Dopper, A.El Boustani, R.Farrell, M.Geiger, M.Gennari, N.Goldberg, J.Herko, T.Kirchner, L.-P.Kubushishi, Z.Li, S.S.Li Muli, A.Long, B.Martin, K.Mohseni, I.Moumene, N.Paracone, E.Parnes, B.Romeo, V.Springer, I.Svensson, O.Thim, N.Yapa Effective field theory analysis of the Coulomb breakup of the one-neutron halo nucleus 19C NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(19C, X)18C, E=67 MeV/nucleon; analyzed available data; deduced σ(θ), σ(E) using NLO Halo-EFT 18C-n potentials. A Halo-EFT description of the projectile within the Coulomb Corrected Eikonal approximation (CCE).
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01181-7
2023CH04 Phys.Rev. C 107, 014309 (2023) P.Choudhary, P.C.Srivastava, M.Gennari, P.Navratil Ab initio no-core shell-model description of 10-14C isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 10,11,12,13,14C; calculated levels, J, π, ground state energy, quadrupole moment, magnetic moment, B(E2), B(M1), point-proton radii, proton and neutron ground-state densities. Ab initio no-core shell-model with CDB2K, INOY, N3LO, and N2LOopt NN interactions. Comparison to experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.014309
2022VO02 Phys.Rev. C 105, 014621 (2022) M.Vorabbi, M.Gennari, P.Finelli, C.Giusti, P.Navratil, R.Machleidt Elastic proton scattering off nonzero spin nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 6,7Li, 13C(polarized p, p), E=200 MeV; 10B(polarized p, p), E=197 MeV; 1H(9C, p), E=290 MeV; calculated σ(θ) and analyzing powers Ay(θ) using microscopic optical potential (OP) and chiral theories for the nucleon-nucleon (NN) interaction, extended to include the spin of the target nucleus. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.014621
2021HO15 Phys.Lett. B 822, 136710 (2021) M.Holl, R.Kanungo, Z.H.Sun, G.Hagen, J.A.Lay, A.M.Moro, P.Navratil, T.Papenbrock, M.Alcorta, D.Connolly, B.Davids, A.Diaz Varela, M.Gennari, G.Hackman, J.Henderson, S.Ishimoto, A.I.Kilic, R.Krucken, A.Lennarz, J.Liang, J.Measures, W.Mittig, O.Paetkau, A.Psaltis, S.Quaglioni, J.S.Randhawa, J.Smallcombe, I.J.Thompson, M.Vorabbi, M.Williams Proton inelastic scattering reveals deformation in 8He NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(8He, p), E=8.25 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products, Ep, Ip. 8He; deduced σ(θ), resonance parameters, first 2+ state, quadrupole deformation parameter. Comparison with no-core shell model predictions. Charged particle spectroscopy station IRIS at TRIUMF in Canada.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136710
2021VO03 Phys.Rev. C 103, 024604 (2021) M.Vorabbi, M.Gennari, P.Finelli, C.Giusti, P.Navratil, R.Machleidt Impact of three-body forces on elastic nucleon-nucleus scattering observables NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C(polarized p, p), E=122, 160, 200, 300 MeV; 16O(p, p), (polarized p, p), E=100, 135, 200, 318 MeV; 12C(n, n), E=108, 128, 155, 185, 225 MeV; calculated differential σ(E, θ), and analyzing power Ay(Ε, θ) using nonrelativistic optical model potentials obtained from the no-core shell model densities using two- and three-nucleon chiral interactions; deduced that contribution of the 3N force in the tNN matrix is small for the differential cross section and sizable for the spin observables such as analyzing power. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.024604
2020VO04 Phys.Rev.Lett. 124, 162501 (2020) M.Vorabbi, M.Gennari, P.Finelli, C.Giusti, P.Navratil Elastic Antiproton-Nucleus Scattering from Chiral Forces
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.162501
2019GE01 Phys.Rev. C 99, 024305 (2019) Nuclear kinetic density from ab initio theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4,6,8He, 12C, 16O; calculated ground state proton, neutron, and nuclear kinetic density contours using ab initio nonlocal scalar one-body nuclear densities with no-core shell model (NCSM) approach and NN-N4LO(500)+3Nlnl interaction. Comparison to procedure applied in density functional theory (DFT). Benchmarking of c.m. removal procedures, and a bridge for comparison between ab initio and DFT many-body techniques.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.024305
2018GE01 Phys.Rev. C 97, 034619 (2018) M.Gennari, M.Vorabbi, A.Calci, P.Navratil Microscopic optical potentials derived from ab initio translationally invariant nonlocal one-body densities NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 4,6,8He, 12C, 16O; calculated ground-state local and nonlocal neutron and proton densities using relativistic mean-field for spherical nuclei, and NN-N4LO(500)+3Nlnl interaction. Calculated densities applied to optical potential construction for analysis of elastic scattering reactions. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4He(p, p), (polarized p, p), E=72, 156, 200 MeV; 1H(6He, p), (8He, p), E=71, 200 MeV, and polarized proton targets; 12C(p, p), (polarized p, p), E=122, 160, 200 MeV; 16O(p, p), (polarized p, p), E=100, 135, 200 MeV; calculated differential σ(θ, E), analyzing powers Ay from translational invariant (trinv) local and nonlocal densities, and from center of mass (COM) contaminated density (wiCOM) and trinv nonlocal densities. Microscopic optical potentials with chiral NN-N4LO(500) interactions as the only input. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034619
Back to query form |