NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 26, 2024. Search: Author = H.W.Hammer Found 89 matches. 2024KI05 Few-Body Systems 65, 29 (2024) T.Kirchner, W.Elkamhawy, H.-W.Hammer Entanglement in Few-Nucleon Scattering Events NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(d, d), E not given; analyzed available data; deduced s-wave contribution to the entanglement power through the phase shifts using the resonating group model (RGM) calculations for the AV18+Urbana-IX and Bonn potentials.
doi: 10.1007/s00601-024-01897-2
2023EB04 Few-Body Systems 64, 87 (2023) M.Ebert, H.-W.Hammer, A.Rusetsky An Alternative Scheme for Pionless EFT: Neutron-Deuteron Scattering in the Doublet S-Wave NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(n, n), E<100 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced the real and imaginary parts of the neutron-deuteron phase shift.
doi: 10.1007/s00601-023-01867-0
2023EL01 J.Phys.(London) G50, 025103 (2023) Halo EFT for 31Ne in a spherical formalism NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 30,31Ne; calculated B(E1), σ(E), electromagnetic properties using Halo EFT. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/aca923
2023EL03 Phys.Rev. C 108, 015501 (2023) W.Elkamhawy, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Weak decay of halo nuclei RADIOACTIVITY 11Be(β-p); calculated differential decay rate for β-delayed proton emission as a function of the final-state particle energy, partial decay rate as a function of the resonance energy, branching ratios, logft. Cluster effective field theory for halo nuclei considering direct decay into the continuum and resonant final state interactions between the proton and the core. Comparison to previous theoretical estimations and available experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.015501
2023GO01 Phys.Rev. C 107, 014617 (2023) M.Gobel, B.Acharya, H.-W.Hammer, D.R.Phillips Final-state interactions and spin structure in E1 breakup of 11Li in halo effective field theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 11Li; charge radii, mean-square neutron charge radius, calculated E1 strength distribution with inclusion of final state interactions in neutron-neutron and neutron-core channels, cumulative B(E1). Halo effective field theory (Halo EFT) at leading order treating 11Li as three-body system 9Li+n+n. Comparison to experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.014617
2023HI07 Eur.Phys.J. A 59, 280 (2023) Pionic final state interactions and the hypertriton lifetime RADIOACTIVITY 3H(π-); analyzed available data; deduced good approximation for the hypertriton decay T1/2.
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01197-z
2023LI16 Eur.Phys.J. A 59, 54 (2023) Y.-H.Lin, H.-W.Hammer, U.-G.Meissner The electromagnetic Sigma-to-Lambda transition form factors with coupled-channel effects in the space-like region
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00973-1
2023VE01 Eur.Phys.J. A 59, 139 (2023) S.Velardita, H.Alvarez-Pol, T.Aumann, Y.Ayyad, M.Duer, H.-W.Hammer, L.Ji, A.Obertelli, Y.Sun Method to evidence hypernuclear halos from a two-target interaction cross section measurement RADIOACTIVITY 3H(π-) [from 12C(12C, X)3H, E=1.9 GeV/nucleon]; measured decay products; deduced interaction σ of hypernuclei with a target nucleus via a two-target measurement. R3B (GSI/FAIR).
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01050-3
2023ZH45 Phys.Rev. C 108, 044304 (2023) X.Zhang, H.-L.Fu, F.-K.Guo, H.-W.Hammer Neutron scattering off one-neutron halo nuclei in halo effective field theory
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.044304
2022CA01 Phys.Lett. B 825, 136847 (2022) P.Capel, D.R.Phillips, H.-W.Hammer Simulating core excitation in breakup reactions of halo nuclei using an effective three-body force NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C(11Be, X)10Be, E=67 MeV/nucleon; analyzed available data; deduced breakup σ(E), σ(θ), resonances using Halo Effective Field Theory and the Dynamical Eikonal Approximation to include an effective 10Be-n-target force.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136847
2022DI03 Phys.Rev. C 105, 064002 (2022) S.Dietz, H.-W.Hammer, S.Konig, A.Schwenk Three-body resonances in pionless effective field theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3NN; calculated hypothetical energy levels, J, π, resonances. Calculations using pionless effective field theory at leading order with Fadeev equations and complemented by finite volume method. Comparison to other calculations obtained in different approaches. Existence of low-energy resonance not confirmed.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.064002
2021EB02 Eur.Phys.J. A 57, 332 (2021) M.Ebert, H.-W.Hammer, A.Rusetsky An alternative scheme for effective range corrections in pionless EFT
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00637-y
2021EL08 Phys.Lett. B 821, 136610 (2021) W.Elkamhawy, Z.Yang, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter β-delayed proton emission from 11Be in effective field theory RADIOACTIVITY 11Be(β-p); calculated decay rate, branching ratios using Halo effective field theory. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136610
2021FU10 Few-Body Systems 62, 72 (2021) R.J.Furnstahl, H.-W.Hammer, A.Schwenk Nuclear Structure at the Crossroads
doi: 10.1007/s00601-021-01658-5
2021GO20 Phys.Rev. C 104, 024001 (2021) M.Gobel, T.Aumann, C.A.Bertulani, T.Frederico, H.-W.Hammer, D.R.Phillips Neutron-neutron scattering length from the 6He (p, pα) nn reaction NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(π-, γ), (n, p), (d, 2He)2n, E not given; compiled experimental data for neutron-neutron scattering lengths reported between 1998 and 2008. 1H(6He, pα)2n, E=few MeV/nucleon; calculated ground-state nn relative-energy distributions for different nn scattering lengths using halo effective field theory (EFT), s-wave scattering length using a method based on the final-state interaction (FSI) between the neutrons after the sudden knockout of the α particle. Comparison with model calculations using the computer code FaCE. Proposed a novel method to measure the neutron-neutron scattering length in inverse kinematics. Relevance to precise determination of the nn scattering length using data from the approved experiment at RIKEN using the 1H(6He, pα)nn reaction.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024001
2021LI52 Eur.Phys.J. A 57, 255 (2021) Y.-H.Lin, H.-W.Hammer, U.-G.Meissner Dispersion-theoretical analysis of the electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon: Past, present and future
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00562-0
2020HI10 Phys.Rev. C 102, 064002 (2020) Lifetime of the hypertriton NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H; calculated half-life of the decay of hypertriton and partial decay widths as a function of the separation energy BΛ in pionless effective field theory (EFT) with Λ, nucleon and deuteron degrees of freedom. Comparison with experimental data. Discussed impact of new measurements on the weak decay parameter of the Λ hyperon. COMPILATION 3H; compiled experimental results for half-life of hypertriton from 1964 to 2019, and the evaluated data from Particle Data Group (PDG).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.064002
2019BR24 J.Phys.(London) G46, 115101 (2019) J.Braun, W.Elkamhawy, R.Roth, H.-W.Hammer Electric structure of shallow D-wave states in Halo EFT NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 15C; calculated electric form factors of one-neutron halo nuclei with shallow D-wave states up to next-to-leading order and the E2 transition, B(E2). Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ab368f
2019HI08 Phys.Rev. C 100, 034002 (2019);Erratum Phys.Rev. C 102, 039901 (2020) Three-body hypernuclei in pionless effective field theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H, 3n; calculated structure of three-body hypernuclei with S=-1 using pionless effective field theory at leading order in the isospin I=0 and I=1 sectors, Λ-d scattering phase shifts, matter radii and corresponding form factors. Discussed constraints on the existence of the Λnn bound state.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.034002
2019SC09 Phys.Rev. C 99, 054611 (2019) M.Schmidt, L.Platter, H.-W.Hammer Neutron transfer reactions in halo effective field theory NUCLEAR REACTIONS 10Be(d, p), E=12, 15, 18, 21.4 MeV; calculated differential σ(θ, E) using halo effective field theory (EFT) at leading-order (LO) and next-to-leading-order (NLO). Comparison with experimental data, and with other theoretical calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.054611
2019SC10 Eur.Phys.J. A 55, 85 (2019) C.H.Schmickler, H.-W.Hammer, E.Hiyama Efimov universality with Coulomb interaction
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2019-12756-8
2018BR18 Eur.Phys.J. A 54, 196 (2018) J.Braun, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Halo structure of 17C NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 17C; calculated halo nucleus predictions of charge radius, magnetic moment of (1/2)+ state, γ-ray transition strengths, 16C(n, γ) E1 capture σ to (1/2)+ at E(cm) below 30 MeV using EFT (Effective Field Theory); discussed Halo EFT predictive power for (3/2)+ and (5/2)+ states (neutron in D-wave).
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2018-12630-3
2018CA23 Phys.Rev. C 98, 034610 (2018) Erratum Phys.Rev. C 105, 019901 (2022) P.Capel, D.R.Phillips, H.-W.Hammer Dissecting reaction calculations using halo effective field theory and ab initio input NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb, 12C(11Be, n), E=67, 69 MeV/nucleon; calculated radial wave functions of 11Be g.s. and 1/2- excited state, 11Be projectile partial wave phase shifts, and break-up σ(E) with contributions from the p3/2, s1/2, p1/2, and d partial waves of 11Be. No-core shell model with continuum (NCSMC) for structure calculations of 11Be. Dynamical eikonal approximation with halo effective field theory (EFT) and ab initio input for reaction mechanism. Comparison with experimental values.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.034610
2018KL03 Phys.Rev. C 98, 034004 (2018) P.Klos, S.Konig, H.-W.Hammer, J.E.Lynn, A.Schwenk Signatures of few-body resonances in finite volume
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.034004
2017BR11 Few-Body Systems 58, 94 (2017) Electric Properties of One-Neutron Halo Nuclei in Halo EFT NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 11Be, 15C; calculated one-neutron halo nuclei form factors, B(E2) using EFT (Effective Field Theory).
doi: 10.1007/s00601-017-1259-5
2017GA10 Phys.Rev.Lett. 118, 232501 (2017) S.Gandolfi, H.-W.Hammer, P.Klos, J.E.Lynn, A.Schwenk Is a Trineutron Resonance Lower in Energy than a Tetraneutron Resonance?
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.232501
2017HA22 J.Phys.(London) G44, 103002 (2017) H.-W.Hammer, C.Ji, D.R.Phillips Effective field theory description of halo nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 2H, 4,5,6He, 8,11Li, 11,14Be, 15,19,22C; calculated halo, Efimov states, matter radii, one- and two-neutron separation energies. Effective field theory (EFT).
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/aa83db
2017KO17 Phys.Rev.Lett. 118, 202501 (2017) S.Konig, H.W.Griesshammer, H.-W.Hammer, U.van Kolck Nuclear Physics Around the Unitarity Limit
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.202501
2016HO21 Eur.Phys.J. A 52, 331 (2016) M.Hoferichter, B.Kubis, J.Ruiz de Elvira, H.-W.Hammer, U.-G.Meissner On the ππ continuum in the nucleon form factors and the proton radius puzzle NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 1n, 1H; calculated nucleon electromagnetic form factors using ππ continuum contribution to isovector spectral functions with up-to-date results for ππ partial waves extracted from Roy-Steiner equations with most recent data on pion vector form factor; deduced contribution to nucleon isovector electric and magnetic radii using sum rules.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16331-7
2016KL06 Phys.Rev. C 94, 054005 (2016) P.Klos, J.E.Lynn, I.Tews, S.Gandolfi, A.Gezerlis, H.-W.Hammer, M.Hoferichter, A.Schwenk Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of two neutrons in finite volume NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 2n; calculated ground state, energy and nodal surface of the first excited state for a two neutron-system in a box; extracted low-energy S-wave scattering parameters from ground- and excited-state energies for different box sizes using Luscher formula. Auxiliary-field diffusion Monte Carlo (AFDMC) calculations, and chiral EFT interactions. Relevance to effective field theories of strong interaction.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.054005
2016KO17 J.Phys.(London) G43, 055106 (2016) S.Konig, H.W.Griesshammer, H.-W.Hammer, U.van Kolck Effective theory of3H and 3He NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H, 3He; calculated binding energy splitting; deduced Coulomb force in pionless EFT is a completely perturbative effect in the trinucleon bound-state regime.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/43/5/055106
2016RY01 Ann.Phys.(New York) 367, 13 (2016) E.Ryberg, C.Forssen, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Range corrections in proton halo nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 16O(p, X)17F, E<2.3 MeV; calculated S-factor, charge radii. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2016.01.008
2015HA11 Acta Phys.Pol. B46, 379 (2015) Three-body Forces: From Cold Atoms to Nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 11Li, 12,14Be, 18,20C, 133Cs; calculated excited Efimov states as function of the neutron-core energy.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.46.379
2015KO11 J.Phys.(London) G42, 345101 (2015) S.Konig, H.W.Griesshammer, H.-W.Hammer The proton-deuteron system in pionless EFT revisited NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 1,2,3H, 3He; calculated binding energies. Pionless effective field theory.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/42/4/045101
2014KO35 Phys.Rev. C 90, 034005 (2014) Precision calculation of the quartet-channel p-d scattering length NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(p, X); calculated quartet-channel p-d scattering, length next-to-next-to-leading order (N2LO) in pionless effective field theory, phase-shift analysis. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.034005
2014RY03 Phys.Rev. C 89, 014325 (2014) E.Ryberg, C.Forssen, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Effective field theory for proton halo nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 16O(p, γ)17F*, E(cm)=0-2000 keV; calculated charge form factor, radiative proton capture cross section, charge radius, astrophysical S factor for excited 1/2+ state in 17F using leading order halo effective field theory (LO halo EFT); comparison with experimental data and other theoretical calculation.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.014325
2014RY06 Eur.Phys.J. A 50, 170 (2014) E.Ryberg, C.Forssen, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Constraining low-energy proton capture on beryllium-7 through charge radius measurements NUCLEAR REACTIONS 7Be(p, γ), E(cm)=0-500 keV. 8B calculated charge radius, reaction S-factor using leading-order effective field theory. Compared with reaction data. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 8B; calculated S-factor vs charge radius; deduced threshold S-factor using charge radius data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14170-2
2014SC20 Few-Body Systems 55, 961 (2014) Universality in the Four-Body System in an EFT Framework
doi: 10.1007/s00601-014-0806-6
2013HA32 Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 132501 (2013) G.Hagen, P.Hagen, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Efimov Physics Around the Neutron-Rich 60Ca Isotope NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 60,61,62Ca; calculated neutron S-wave scattering phase shifts; deduced correlations between different three-body observables and the two-neutron separation energy. Modern ab initio interactions derived from chiral effective theory.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.132501
2013HA33 Eur.Phys.J. A 49, 118 (2013) P.Hagen, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Charge form factors of two-neutron halo nuclei in halo EFT NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 9,10,11Li, 12,13,14Be, 20,21,22C; calculated charge formfactors, charge radii including halo nuclei using EFT (effective field theory); deduced parameters. Compared with available measurement.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2013-13118-4
2013LE06 Eur.Phys.J. A 49, 20 (2013) M.Lenkewitz, E.Epelbaum, H.-W.Hammer, U.-G.Meissner Threshold neutral pion photoproduction off the tri-nucleon to O(q4)
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2013-13020-1
2012BO13 Phys.Rev. C 86, 034003 (2012) S.Bour, H.-W.Hammer, D.Lee, U.G.Meissner Benchmark calculations for elastic fermion-dimer scattering
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.034003
2012LO15 Eur.Phys.J. A 48, 151 (2012) I.T.Lorenz, H.-W.Hammer, U.-G.Meissner The size of the proton: Closing in on the radius puzzle NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 1H; analyzed formfactor vs energy; deduced electric radius, magnetic radius; calculated electric radius, magnetic radius using dispersive relations with analyticity and unitarity of nucleon structure.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2012-12151-1
2011HA41 Nucl.Phys. A865, 17 (2011) Electric properties of the Beryllium-11 system in Halo EFT NUCLEAR REACTIONS 11Be(γ, n), (γ, γ'), E=0.5-6.5 MeV; calculated formfactors, electric radius, neutron radius, B(E1), Coulomb excitation; deduced interaction parameters. Effective field theory with local, nonlocal interactions.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.06.028
2011KO27 Phys.Rev. C 83, 064001 (2011) Low-energy p-d scattering and 3He in pionless effective field theory NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(d, d), E=low; calculated elastic scattering phase shift up to N2LO using the power counting for Coulomb contributions. 3He, 3H; calculated Coulomb contribution to the binding energy difference. S-wave scattering in Pionless effective field theory. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.064001
2010CA15 Nucl.Phys. A836, 275 (2010) Range corrections for two-neutron halo nuclei in effective theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 11Li, 12,14Be, 18,20C; calculated radii for 2n halo nuclei Efimov states based on a three-body system.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.02.014
2010KR09 Eur.Phys.J. A 43, 229 (2010) On the modification of the Efimov spectrum in a finite cubic box
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2010-10910-6
2010SI28 Eur.Phys.J. A 45, 357 (2010) A.Sibirtsev, J.Haidenbauer, H.-W.Hammer, S.Krewald, U.-G.Meissner Proton-proton scattering above 3 GeV/c
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2010-11014-1
2008CA29 Eur.Phys.J. A 37, 367 (2008) Universal properties and structure of halo nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE A=1-100; 11Li, 12,14Be, 18,20C; calculated three-body binding energies, Efimov state energies, matter density form factors, radii in 2n halo nuclei using an effective quantum mechanics approach. Comparison with data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2008-10632-4
2008HA35 Eur.Phys.J. A 37, 193 (2008) A model study of discrete scale invariance and long-range interactions
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2008-10617-3
2008HI12 Nucl.Phys. A809, 171 (2008) R.Higa, H.-W.Hammer, U.van Kolck αα scattering in halo effective field theory NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4H(α, α'), E=0-3.5 MeV; calculated phase shifts. Effective field theory and effective-range expansion, halo and cluster nuclei discussed.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2008.06.003
2008SI28 Eur.Phys.J. A 37, 287 (2008) A.Sibirtsev, H.-W.Hammer, U.-G.Meissner A-dependence of φ-meson production in p + A collisions
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2008-10649-7
2007BE12 Phys.Rev. C 75, 035202 (2007) M.A.Belushkin, H.-W.Hammer, Ulf-G.Meissner Dispersion analysis of the nucleon form factors including meson continua NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 1n, 1H; analyzed electromagnetic form factors. Dispersion analysis.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.75.035202
2007HA26 Nucl.Phys. A790, 103c (2007) Few-body effects in cold atoms and limit cycles
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.03.159
2007HA41 Eur.Phys.J. A 32, 113 (2007) Universal properties of the four-body system with large scattering length
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2006-10301-8
2007HA42 Eur.Phys.J. A 32, 335 (2007) H.-W.Hammer, D.R.Phillips, L.Platter Pion-mass dependence of three-nucleon observables NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H; calculated ground and excited state binding energies using effective field theory.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2007-10380-y
2007SI26 Eur.Phys.J. A 32, 229 (2007) A.Sibirtsev, J.Haidenbauer, H.-W.Hammer, U.-G.Meissner The pp → K+Σ+ n cross-section from missing-mass spectra
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2007-10370-1
2006HA41 Eur.Phys.J. A 28, Supplement 1, 49 (2006) Nucleon form factors in dispersion theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 1n, 1H; calculated form factors, two-pion and pion-cloud contributions. Comparison with data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2006-09-006-5
2006PL02 Nucl.Phys. A766, 132 (2006) Universality in the triton charge form factor NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H; calculated charge form factor, charge radius, correlations. Comparison with data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.11.023
2006SI15 Eur.Phys.J. A 27, 269 (2006) A.Sibirtsev, J.Haidenbauer, H.-W.Hammer, S.Krewald Resonances and final-state interactions in the reaction pp → pK+Λ NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(p, pK+X), E=high; analysed Λ hyperon production σ, partial scattering amplitudes, invariant mass spectra, angular correlation effects and proton-hyperon final state interaction.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2005-10268-x
2006SI28 Eur.Phys.J. A 29, 209 (2006) A.Sibirtsev, H.-W.Hammer, U.-G.Meissner, A.W.Thomas φ-meson photoproduction from nuclei
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2006-10070-4
2006SI30 Eur.Phys.J. A 29, 363 (2006) A.Sibirtsev, J.Haidenbauer, H.-W.Hammer, U.-G.Meissner Phenomenology of the Λ/Σ0 production ratio in pp collisions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(p, K+X), E=high; analyzed hyperon yields, related data; deduced final state interaction effects.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2006-10097-5
2005HA40 J.Phys.(London) G31, S1253 (2005) Few-body physics in effective field theory
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/31/8/003
2005PL01 Phys.Lett. B 607, 254 (2005) L.Platter, H.-W.Hammer, Ulf.-G.Meissner On the correlation between the binding energies of the triton and the α-particle NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H, 4He; calculated binding energies, correlations.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.068
2004HA17 Phys.Lett. B 586, 291 (2004) H.-W.Hammer, D.Drechsel, Ulf-G.Meissner On the pion cloud of the nucleon NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 1n, 1H; calculated form factors, two-pion contributions.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2003.12.073
2004HA32 Nucl.Phys. A737, 275 (2004) Universality in the physics of cold atoms with large scattering length
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.03.088
2004HA35 Eur.Phys.J. A 20, 469 (2004) Updated dispersion-theoretical analysis of the nucleon electromagnetic form factors NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 1n, 1H; compiled, analyzed form factor data, radii. Dispersion-theoretical analysis.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2003-10223-y
2003BE08 Nucl.Phys. A714, 589 (2003) P.E.Bedaque, G.Rupak, H.W.Griesshammer, H.-W.Hammer Low energy expansion in the three body system to all orders and the triton channel NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(n, n), E not given; calculated phase shifts, three-body force effects.
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01402-1
2003BE42 Phys.Lett. B 569, 159 (2003) P.F.Bedaque, H.-W.Hammer, U.van Kolck Narrow resonances in effective field theory NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4He(n, n), E=0-1 MeV; calculated total σ. 4He(n, n), E(cm)=15.5 MeV; calculated σ(θ). Effective field theory.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2003.07.049
2003PL01 Nucl.Phys. A714, 250 (2003) L.Platter, H.-W.Hammer, U.-G.Meissner Quasiparticle properties in effective field theory
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01365-9
2002BE83 Nucl.Phys. A712, 37 (2002) C.A.Bertulani, H.-W.Hammer, U.van Kolck Effective field theory for halo nuclei: shallow p-wave states NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4H(n, n'), E=0-4 MeV; calculated phase shifts, σ, σ(θ). Effective field theory, application to halo nuclei discussed.
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01270-8
2002FU06 Phys.Lett. 531B, 203 (2002) Are Occupation Numbers Observable ?
doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01504-0
2002HA28 Nucl.Phys. A705, 173 (2002) The Hypertriton in Effective Field Theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H; calculated hypertriton binding energy, Λd scattering length. Effective field theory.
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)00621-8
2001FU08 Nucl.Phys. A689, 846 (2001) R.J.Furnstahl, H.-W.Hammer, N.Tirfessa Field Redefinitions at Finite Density
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00687-4
2001HA42 Nucl.Phys. A690, 535 (2001) A Renormalized Equation for the Three-Body System with Short-Range Interactions
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00710-7
2001HA53 Phys.Lett. 516B, 353 (2001) Range Corrections to Doublet S-Wave Neutron-Deuteron Scattering NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(n, n), E not given; calculated S-wave phase shifts, range corrections. Comparison with data.
doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00918-2
2000BE39 Nucl.Phys. A676, 357 (2000) P.F.Bedaque, H.-W.Hammer, U.van Kolck Effective Theory of the Triton NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H; calculated phase shifts, three-nucleon bound state spectrum, scattering lengths. Three-body forces discussed. Effective field theory calculations. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(n, X), E=low; calculated phase shifts, three-nucleon bound state spectrum, scattering lengths. Three-body forces discussed. Effective field theory calculations.
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00205-0
2000HA49 Nucl.Phys. A678, 277 (2000) Effective Field Theory for Dilute Fermi Systems
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00325-0
1999BE06 Nucl.Phys. A646, 444 (1999) P.F.Bedaque, H.-W.Hammer, U.van Kolck The Three-Boson System with Short-Range Interactions
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00650-2
1999HA50 Eur.Phys.J. A 6, 115 (1999) Rare Pionium Decays and Pion Polarizability
doi: 10.1007/s100500050324
1999HA53 Phys.Rev. C60, 045204 (1999); Erratum Phys.Rev. C62, 049902 (2000) H.-W.Hammer, M.J.Ramsey-Musolf K(K-bar) Continuum and Isoscalar Nucleon Form Factors
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.60.045204
1999HA54 Phys.Rev. C60, 045205 (1999); Erratum Phys.Rev. C62, 049903 (2000) H.-W.Hammer, M.J.Ramsey-Musolf Spectral Content of Isoscalar Nucleon Form Factors
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.60.045205
1998BA70 Nucl.Phys. A640, 259 (1998) L.L.Barz, H.Forkel, H.-W.Hammer, F.S.Navarra, M.Nielsen, M.J.Ramsey-Musolf K* Mesons and Nucleon Strangeness
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00438-2
1998BE37 Phys.Rev. C58, R641 (1998) P.F.Bedaque, H.-W.Hammer, U.van Kolck Effective Theory for Neutron-Deuteron Scattering: Energy dependence NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(n, X), E not given; calculated phase shifts.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.58.R641
1998HA04 Phys.Lett. 416B, 5 (1998) H.-W.Hammer, M.J.Ramsey-Musolf Nucleon Vector Strangeness Form Factors: Multi-pion continuum and the OZI rule
doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01322-1
1998MU10 Nucl.Phys. A633, 481 (1998) N.C.Mukhopadhyay, M.J.Ramsey-Musolf, S.J.Pollock, J.Liu, H.-W.Hammer Parity-Violating Excitation of the Δ(1232): Hadron structure and new physics
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00147-X
1996HA35 Phys.Lett. 385B, 343 (1996) H.-W.Hammer, Ulf.-G.Meissner, D.Drechsel Dispersion-Theoretical Analysis of the Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors: Inclusion of time-like data NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 1H, 1n; analyzed electromagnetic form factor data; deduced perturbative, nonperturbative regime separation scale parameter. Time-like region included.
doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00865-9
1996HA42 Phys.Lett. 367B, 323 (1996) H.-W.Hammer, Ulf.-G.Meissner, D.Drechsel The Strangeness Radius and Magnetic Moment of the Nucleon Revisted
doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)01409-8
1995HA41 Z.Phys. A353, 321 (1995) Parity Violating Pion Electroproduction Off the Nucleon
doi: 10.1007/BF01292338
Back to query form |