NSR Query Results

Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 27, 2024.

Search: Author = S.E.Agbemava

Found 20 matches.

Back to query form

2023SP02      Phys.Lett. B 841, 137932 (2023)

M.Spieker, S.E.Agbemava, D.Bazin, S.Biswas, P.D.Cottle, P.J.Farris, A.Gade, T.Ginter, S.Giraud, K.W.Kemper, J.Li, W.Nazarewicz, S.Noji, J.Pereira, L.A.Riley, M.Smith, D.Weisshaar, R.G.T.Zegers

Hexadecapole strength in the rare isotopes ^{74, 76}Kr

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹H(⁷⁴Kr, ⁷⁴Kr'), (⁷⁶Kr, ⁷⁶Kr'), E(cm)=100 MeV, [secondary ^74,76Kr beams from ⁹Be(⁷⁸Kr, X), E=150 MeV/nucleon primary reaction, followed by separation of fragments using A1900 separator]; measured Doppler-corrected Eγ, Iγ, (particle)γ-coin using NSCL-MSU using NSCL/Ursinus Liquid Hydrogen (LH2) Target, eight GRETINA modules of 36-fold segmented HPGe detectors for γ radiation, and S800 spectrograph for projectile-like reaction residues. ^74,76Kr; deduced levels, Jπ, β₂ for the first 2+ state and β₄ and B(E4)(W.u.) for the first 4+ state from inelastic proton scattering experiments in inverse kinematics. Comparison to coupled-channels calculations, and nuclear density functional theory (DFT) calculations using the Skyrme SkM* and UNEDF1 energy density functionals, covariant NL3* and DD-PC1 energy density functionals. Systematics and theoretical predictions of β₂, β₄ and B(E4)(W.u.) for ^{74,76,78,80,82,84,86}Kr.

doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137932
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.

2021AG03      Phys.Rev. C 103, 034323 (2021)

S.E.Agbemava, A.V.Afanasjev

Hyperheavy spherical and toroidal nuclei: The role of shell structure

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ⁴⁵⁶156; calculated binding energy as function of β₂ deformation parameter. Z=1-200, N=1-440; calculated distribution of ellipsoidal and toroidal shapes in the nuclear landscape using RHB with CEDF DD-PC1. ⁵⁸Ni, ^100,132Sn, ²⁰⁸Pb, ³⁰⁴120, ³⁶⁶138, ⁴⁶²154, ⁵⁹²186; calculated proton and neutron shell gaps, fission barrier heights as functions of proton and neutron numbers using NL1, NL3, NL3^*, FSUGold, DD-ME2, DD-MEδ, DD-PC1, PC-PK1, PC-F1, and TM1 covariant energy density functionals. ⁵⁹²186; calculated potential energy surfaces in (β₂, β₃) and (β₂cos(γ+30°), β₃sin(γ+30°))plane. ³⁴⁸138, ⁴⁶⁶156, ⁵⁸⁴174, ⁵⁹²186; calculated proton and neutron densities. ³⁴⁸138, ⁴⁶⁶156; calculated proton and neutron single-particle energies, deformation energy curves and dominant components Nilsson wave functions, Z=126-144, N=206-228; Z=128-144, N=204-228; Z=126-144; calculated S(2n), S(2p) for even-even nuclei. Investigation of the properties of spherical and toroidal hyperheavy even-even nuclei and their underlying shell structures using covariant density functional theory (CDFT).

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.034323
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020AL10      Phys.Rev. C 102, 024326 (2020)

S.O.Allehabi, V.A.Dzuba, V.V.Flambaum, A.V.Afanasjev, S.E.Agbemava

Using isotope shift for testing nuclear theory: The case of nobelium isotopes

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ^252,254No; calculated nuclear charge distributions, rms charge radii for five nuclear models using covariant density functional theory (CDFT) with state-of-the-art covariant energy density functionals, isotope shifts and field isotope shifts for four electric dipole atomic transitions using CI+MBPT method. Comparison with experimental data. ²⁵⁴No, ²⁸⁶No; calculated difference in charge radii, isotope shifts between ²⁵⁴No and hypothetical ²⁸⁶No in different nuclear models for four electric dipole transitions from the ground state.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024326
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020CA18      Phys.Rev. C 102, 024311 (2020)

Y.Cao, S.E.Agbemava, A.V.Afanasjev, W.Nazarewicz, E.Olsen

Landscape of pear-shaped even-even nuclei

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=40-100, N=40-200; calculated ground state octupole deformations β₃ and octupole deformation energies of even-even nuclei in the (Z, N) plane using the Skyrme energy density functionals (SEDFs): UNEDF0, UNEDF1, UNEDF2, SLy4, and SV-min. ⁸⁰Zr, ^112,146Ba, ²²⁴Ra, ²⁸⁶Th; calculated Single-particle energy splitting between the unusual-parity intruder shell and the normal-parity shell using (SEDFs): UNEDF0, UNEDF1, UNEDF2, SLy4, SV-min, DD-ME2, NL3^*, DD-PC1 and PC-PK1. ^{212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230}Rn, ^{214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232}Ra, ^{216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234}Th, ^{216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234}U, ^{138,140,142,144,146,148,150,152}Ba, ^{140,142,144,146,148,150,152,154}Ce, ^{142,144,146,148,150,152,154,156}Nd; calculated deformation parameters β₂, β₃, and octupole deformation energies using the Skyrme energy density functionals models. ^{112,114,144,146,148}Ba, ^144,146,148Ce, ^{146,148,196,198}Nd, ^{150,194,196,198}Sm, ^196,198,200Gd, ^198,200,202Dy, ^200,202Er, ^{218,220,222,224,278,280,282}Rn, ^{218,220,222,224,226,228,280,282,284,286,288}Ra, ^{220,222,224,226,228,282,284,286,288,290}Th, ^{222,224,226,228,230,282,284,286,288,290}U, ^{224,226,228,230,232,284,286,288,290,292}Pu, ^{224,226,228,230,284,286,288,290,292,294}Cm, ^{226,228,230,284,286,288,290,292,294,296}Cf, ^{226,228,230,232,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298}Fm, ^{230,286,288,290,292,294,296,298}No, ^{288,290,292,294,296,300}Rf, ^290,292,294Sg; calculated β₃ deformation parameter, octupole deformation energies, proton moments Q₂₀ and Q₃₀ for octupole-deformed nuclei obtained in five Skyrme energy density functionals, and four covariant energy density functionals. Comparison between Skyrme and covariant models, and with relevant experimental data. See also supplemental material.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024311
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020TA21      Phys.Rev. C 102, 054330 (2020)

A.Taninah, S.E.Agbemava, A.V.Afanasjev

Covariant density functional theory input for r-process simulations in actinides and superheavy nuclei: The ground state and fission properties

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ^{206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,220,220,220,220,230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300}Th, ^{264,266,258,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308,310,312,314,316,318,320,322,324,326,328,330,332,334,336,338,340,342,344,346,348,350,352,354,356,358,360,362,364,366,368}Ds; calculated binding energies as function of deformation β₂. ^{240,242,326,328}Cf, ^246,330,332Fm, ^{248,250,334,336}No, ^250,252,254Rf, ^254,256Sg; calculated superdeformed minima, β₂, β₃, second fission barriers, deformation energy curves and potential energy surface in (β₂, β₃) plane for ²⁴⁰Cf. ^{202,204,308,346}Th, ^{210,214,316,350}U, ^{216,220,326,352}Pu, ^{222,224,348,354}Cm, ^228,354,356Cf, ^232,358Fm, ^236,238,360No, ^242,244,362Rf, ^248,250,364Sg, ^{254,256,366,396}Hs, ^{260,264,368,402}Ds, ^{266,270,370,410}Cn, ^{272,276,376,416}Fl, ^{278,282,402,428}Lv, ^{284,288,412,436}Og, ^{290,294,418,434}120; predicted two-proton and two-neutron drip lines. ^{298,302,306,308,310,312,316,318,320,322,326,328,330,332,336,340}Og; calculated potential-energy surfaces in (β₂cos(γ+30), β₂sin(γ+30)) plane. Z=90-120, N=110-320; calculated proton quadrupole deformations β₂, binding-energies, S(2n), Q(α), α-decay half-lives, heights of primary fission barriers. Covariant density functional theory (CDFT) using state-of-the-art DD-PC1, DD-ME2, NL3*, and PC-PK1 CEDFs. Comparison to available data. Relevance to r-process modeling in heavy nuclei, and for the study of fission cycling.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054330
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019AG03      Phys.Rev. C 99, 014318 (2019)

S.E.Agbemava, A.V.Afanasjev, A.Taninah

Propagation of statistical uncertainties in covariant density functional theory: Ground state observables and single-particle properties

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ^{34,36,38,40,42,44,46,48,50,52,54,56,58,60,62,64,66,68,70,72,74,76}Ca, ^{50,52,54,56,58,60,62,64,66,68,70,72,74,76,78,80,82,84,86,88,90,92,94,96}Ni, ^{98,100,102,104,106,108,110,112,114,116,118,120,122,124,126,128,130,132,134,136,138,140,142,144,146,148,150,152,154,156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172}Sn, ^{176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266}Pb, ³⁰⁴120; calculated range of variations of parameters and statistical uncertainties in total binding energy, charge radii, S(2n), and neutron skins using covariant energy density functional theory (CDFT) with only the covariant energy density functionals (CEDFs) with nonlinear density dependency. ^208,266Pb, ³⁰⁴120; calculated neutron and proton single-particle states, and relative energies of the pairs of neutron and proton single-particle states. Z=2-112, N=2-172; deduced differences between theoretical and experimental binding energies for several CEDFs for even-even nuclei; calculated charge quadrupole deformations β₂ of ground states in even-even nuclei using the RHB calculations. Z=2-96, N=2-152; deduced differences between theoretical and experimental charge radii for several CEDFs.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.014318
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019AG06      Phys.Rev. C 99, 034316 (2019)

S.E.Agbemava, A.V.Afanasjev, A.Taninah, A.Gyawali

Extension of the nuclear landscape to hyperheavy nuclei

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ²⁰⁸Pb, ⁴⁶⁶156; calculated binding energies versus β₂. ³⁶⁶138, ⁴⁶⁶156, ⁵⁸⁰174; calculated neutron and proton single-particle energies, potential energy surfaces (PES) in (β₂, β₃) and (β₂, γ) planes. ⁴⁶⁶156; calculated neutron density distribution versus β₂, neutron and proton pairing energies and pairing gaps as a function of the β₂ and γ deformations. ²⁰⁸Pb, ²⁹²120, ³⁶⁸138, ⁴⁶⁶156, ⁵⁸⁴174; calculated proton and neutron densities, charge radii, neutron skins. ^296,300122, ^316,320124; calculated deformation energy curves as function of β₂, potential energy surfaces (PES) in (β₂, β₃) plane. ^{324,328,332,336,340,344,348,352,356,360,364,368,372,376,380,384,388,392,396,400,404,408,412,416,420,424,428,432,436,440,444,448,452,456,460,464}138; calculated deformation energy curves, and proton and neutron chemical potentials as function of β₂. ²⁶⁸Sg, ³³²Ds, ³⁶⁰130, ^354,432134, ³⁴⁸138; calculated three-dimensional potential energy surfaces in (β₂, β₄, γ) plane. ^{258,268,278,288,298,308,318,328,338,348,358}Sg, ^{272,282,292,302,312,322,332,342,352,362}Ds, ^{276,286,296,306,316,326,336,346,356,366}Fl, ^{290,300,310,320,330,340,350,360,370,380,390}Og; calculated heights of fission barriers along the fission paths for quadrupole and triaxial deformations, inner fission barrier heights. ²⁰⁸Pb, ³⁵⁴134, ⁴⁶⁶156, ⁴²⁶176; calculated Coulomb energies as function of β₂. Z=140-180, N=192-420; calculated proton β₂ values of the lowest in energy solutions of the Z=140-180 nuclei. Z=132-176, N=292-324; calculated S(2n), S(2p), neutron and proton pairing energies for spherical minima. Z=2-170, N=2-440; calculated proton quadrupole deformations β₂ of the lowest in energy minima for axial symmetry with ellipsoidal-like shapes, for nuclei with fission barriers > 2 MeV, and nuclei with two-proton and two-neutron drip lines. Covariant density functional theory with DD-ME2, PC-PK1, DD-PC1 and NL3* functionals, based on axial reflection symmetric and reflection asymmetric relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov (RHB) calculations, and treating triaxiality within the triaxial RHB and triaxial relativistic mean field+BCS frameworks.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.034316
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2018AF01      Phys.Scr. 93, 034002 (2018)

A.V.Afanasjev, H.Abusara, S.E.Agbemava

Octupole deformation in neutron-rich actinides and superheavy nuclei and the role of nodal structure of single-particle wavefunctions in extremely deformed structures of light nuclei

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ²⁹²Cm, ³⁶Ar; calculated octupole deformed shapes in neutron-rich actinides; deduced the presence of new region of octupole deformation in neutron-rich actinides, lack of octupole deformation in the ground states of superheavy for Z>108.

doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/aaa3d0
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2017AG05      Phys.Rev. C 95, 054324 (2017)

S.E.Agbemava, A.V.Afanasjev, D.Ray, P.Ring

Assessing theoretical uncertainties in fission barriers of superheavy nuclei

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ^{276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296}Cn, ^{280,282,284,286,288,294,296,298}Fl, ^{284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300}Lv, ^{288,290,294,296,298,300,302,304,306}Og, ^{292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308}120; calculated heights of inner fission barriers. Z=96-126, N=140-196; calculated heights of inner fission barriers, binding energies of ground states, energies of saddle points. ²⁹⁶Cn; calculated deformation energy curves as function of β₂. ²⁸⁴Cn, ³⁰⁰120; calculated potential energy surface contours in (β₂cos(γ+30), β₂sin(γ+30)) plane, with systematic and statistical uncertainties quantified, and benchmarking of the functionals to the experimental data on fission barriers. Covariant energy density functional (CEDF) theory based on the state-of-the-art functionals NL3*, DD-ME2, DD-MEd, DD-PC1, and PC-PK1, in the axially symmetric and triaxial relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov (RHB) frameworks.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054324
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2017AG08      Phys.Rev. C 96, 024301 (2017)

S.E.Agbemava, A.V.Afanasjev

Octupole deformation in the ground states of even-even Z ∼ 96, N ∼ 196 actinides and superheavy nuclei

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ^{278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298}Th, ^{282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300}U, ^{280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302}Pu, ^{280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304}Cm, ^{282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306}Cf, ^{284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308}Fm, ^{282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308,310}No, ^{284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308,310,312}Rf, ^{286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308,310,312,314}Sg; calculated equilibrium quadrupole β₂, octupole β₃ deformations, and ΔE(octupole). ^{286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300}Cm, ²⁸⁸Th, ²⁹⁰U, ²⁹²Pu, ²⁹⁶Cf, ²⁹⁸Fm, ³⁰⁰No, ³⁰²Rf; calculated potential energy surfaces of even-A Cm isotopes and N=118 isotones in the (β₂, β₃) plane. State-of-the-art covariant energy density functionals (CDFT) using DD-PC1, DD-ME2, NL3*, and PC-PK1 functionals. Comparison with Skyrme DFT, Gogny DFT, and microscopic+macroscopic calculations.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.024301
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2016AF01      Phys.Rev. C 93, 054310 (2016)

A.V.Afanasjev, S.E.Agbemava

Covariant energy density functionals: Nuclear matter constraints and global ground state properties

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z<100, N<160; calculated binding energies and charge radii of ground states using state-of-the-art covariant energy density functionals; deduced that density functionals with good description of global binding energies and properties of other ground and excited state not necessarily obtained from strict enforcement of constraints on nuclear matter properties (NMP). Detailed comparisons with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054310
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2016AG06      Phys.Rev. C 93, 044304 (2016)

S.E.Agbemava, A.V.Afanasjev, P.Ring

Octupole deformation in the ground states of even-even nuclei: A global analysis within the covariant density functional theory

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ^56,60Ca, ⁷⁸Sr, ^{78,80,108,110,112}Zr, ⁸²Mo, ⁹⁰Cd, ^{108,110,112,142,144}Xe, ^{108,110,112,114,116,142,144,146,148,150}Ba, ^{114,144,146,148,150}Ce, ^146,148,150Nd, ¹⁵⁰Sm, ^{196,198,200,202}Gd, ^200,202,204Dy, ^{198,200,202,204}Er, ²⁰⁴Yb, ²¹⁰Os, ²¹⁴Pt, ^216,218Hg, ^{180,182,184,216,218,220,222}Pb, ^218,220,222Po, ^{218,220,222,224,226,232}Rn, ^{218,220,222,224,226,228,230}Ra, ^{220,222,224,226,228,230,232,236,288,290,292,294}Th, ^{220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,238,290,292,294,296}U, ^{222,224,226,228,230,232,234,240,288,290,292,294,296}Pu, ^{224,226,228,230,232,234,236,242,286,288,290,292,294,296,298}Cm, ^{224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238,288,290,292,294,296,298,300}Cf, ^{226,228,232,234,236,238,240,290,292,294,296,298,300,302}Fm, ^{236,238,240,242,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306}No, ^{242,244,246,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,304,306,308}Rf, ^{248,250,288,290,292,294,300,302,304,306}Sg; calculated equilibrium β₂, β₃ deformation parameters for ground states using DD-PC1 and NL3* density functional models and ϵ₂, ϵ₃ parameters by mic-mac (MM) approach, potential energy surfaces in (β₂, β₃) plane using CEDF DD-PC1 theory. Covariant energy density functionals (CEDF) of different types, with a nonlinear meson coupling, with density-dependent meson couplings, and pairing correlations within relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory. Predicted a new region of octupole deformation around Z=98 and N=196. Comparison with available experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044304
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2015AF01      Phys.Rev. C 91, 014324 (2015)

A.V.Afanasjev, S.E.Agbemava, D.Ray, P.Ring

Neutron drip line: Single-particle degrees of freedom and pairing properties as sources of theoretical uncertainties

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=4-110, N=4-260; Z=70, N=78-180; calculated neutron pairing energies, neutron δ(2n)(Z, N) quantities between two-proton and two-neutron drip lines. Z=86, N=184-206; calculated neutron chemical potential, neutron quadrupole deformation β₂, neutron pairing gap, neutron pairing energy, and neutron single-particle energies. ¹¹⁴Ge, ¹⁸⁰Xe, ²⁶⁶Pb, ²⁷⁰Rn, ³⁶⁶Hs; calculated neutron single-particle states at spherical shape, neutron shell gaps at the 2n-drip lines, spread of theoretical predictions for the single-particle energies. ⁵⁶Ni, ^100,132Sn, ²⁰⁸Pb; calculated spread of theoretical predictions for the single-particle energies for doubly magic nuclei. Analyzed theoretical uncertainties in the prediction of the two-neutron drip line using covariant density functional theory (CEDFs) and several interactions.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.014324
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2015AF02      Acta Phys.Pol. B46, 405 (2015)

A.V.Afanasjev, S.E.Agbemava

Nuclear Structure Theory of the Heaviest Nuclei

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ^292,304120; analyzed available data; calculated single-particle states, J, π.

doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.46.405
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2015AG09      Phys.Rev. C 92, 054310 (2015)

S.E.Agbemava, A.V.Afanasjev, T.Nakatsukasa, P.Ring

Covariant density functional theory: Reexamining the structure of superheavy nuclei

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ^{236,238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292}Cm, ^{238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294}Cf, ^{240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296}Fm, ^{242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298}No, ^{246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300}Rf, ^{250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302}Sg, ^{258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304}Hs, ^{264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306}Ds, ^{270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308}Cn, ^{276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308,310}Fl, ^{282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308,310,312}Lv, ^{290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308,310,312,314}Og, ^{292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308,310,312,314,316}120, ^{298,300,302,304,306,308,310,312,314,316,318}122, ^{304,306,308,310,312,314,316,318,320}124, ^{312,314,316,318,320,322}126, ^{318,320,322,324}128, ^324,326130; calculated binding energies, proton and neutron quadrupole deformations, charge radii, root-mean square (rms) proton radii, neutron skin thicknesses, S(2n), S(2p), Q(α) and T_1/2(α) using Viola-Seaborg formula. ^292,304120; calculated neutron and proton single-particle states, shell gaps. Relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov theory with DD-PC1 and PC-PK1 interactions, and five most up-to-date covariant energy density functionals of different types.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.054310
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2014AG08      Phys.Rev. C 89, 054320 (2014)

S.E.Agbemava, A.V.Afanasjev, D.Ray, P.Ring

Global performance of covariant energy density functionals: Ground state observables of even-even nuclei and the estimate of theoretical uncertainties

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=2-120, N=2-280; calculated properties of ground states of even-even nuclei between the two-proton and two-neutron drip lines, binding energies, S(2n), S(2p), charge quadrupole-, hexadecapole- and isovector β₂ deformations, charge radii, neutron skin thickness, positions of two-proton and two-neutron drip line, neutron and proton three-point indicators and pairing gaps, density, energy per particle, incompressibility, effective masses. Large-scale axial relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov calculations with four modern covariant energy density functionals (CEDF) such as NL3*, DD-ME2, DD-MEd, and DD-PC1. Comparison with other calculations and experimental data. Also supplemental information available.

ATOMIC MASSES A=10-300; calculated masses, binding energies of 835 even-even nuclei and compared with experimental values. Large-scale axial relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov calculations with four modern covariant energy density functionals (CEDFs).

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.054320
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2013AF02      Phys.Lett. B 726, 680 (2013)

A.V.Afanasjev, S.E.Agbemava, D.Ray, P.Ring

Nuclear landscape in covariant density functional theory

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=1-120, N=1-300; calculated two-proton and neutron separation energies and dripline, neutron chemical potentials, quadrupole deformations. Skyrme density and covariant density functional theory calculations.

doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2013.09.017
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2011AG01      Ann.Nucl.Energy 38, 379 (2011)

S.E.Agbemava, R.B.M.Sogbadji, B.J.B.Nyarko, R.Della

Measurement of thermal neutron capture cross section and resonance integral of the ¹³⁸Ba(n, γ)¹³⁹Ba reaction using ⁵⁵Mn(n, γ)⁵⁶Mn as a monitor

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁵⁵Mn, ¹³⁸Ba(n, γ), E=thermal; measured Eγ, Iγ; deduced thermal σ, resonance integral.

doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2010.10.005
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 dataset31700.

2011AG07      Ann.Nucl.Energy 38, 1616 (2011)

S.E.Agbemava, B.J.B.Nyarko, J.J.Fletcher, R.B.M.Sogbadji, E.Mensimah, M.Asamoah

Measurement of thermal neutron and resonance integral cross sections of the reaction ⁵¹V(N, γ)⁵²V using a 20 Ci Am-Be isotopic neutron source

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁵¹V, ⁵⁵Mn(n, γ), E=thermal; measured Eγ, Iγ; deduced thermal and resonance integral σ. Comparison with experimental data and JENDL-3.2 evaluated nuclear library.

doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2011.02.019
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 dataset31716.

2011AG09      Ann.Nucl.Energy 38, 1737 (2011)

S.E.Agbemava, B.J.B.Nyarko, J.J.Fletcher, R.B.M.Sogbadji, E.Mensimah, M.Asamoah

Thermal neutron cross section determination of short-to-medium lived nuclides using a 20 Ci Am-Be neutron source

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁵⁵Mn, ¹²⁷I, ^152,154Sm, ²³⁸U(n, γ), E=thermal; measured Eγ, Iγ; deduced thermal neutron σ and uncertainties. Activation technique.

doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2011.04.004
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 dataset31717.