NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 26, 2024. Search: Author = A.Dobrowolski Found 44 matches. 2023BL04 Phys.Rev. C 108, 044618 (2023) J.M.Blanco, A.Dobrowolski, A.Zdeb, J.Bartel Spontaneous fission half-lives of actinides and superheavy elements
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.044618
2023KO16 Phys.Rev. C 108, 024605 (2023) Influence of boundary conditions on the characteristics of nuclear fission NUCLEAR REACTIONS 233,235U, 238,239,240,242,244Pu, 244,245,246,248Cm, 249,252,254,256Cf, 254,255,256,258,260Fm(n, F), E = thermal; calculated primary fragment mass distribution dependence on neck parameters. Calculations using quasiclassical statistical approach based on the Langevin formalism. Comparison to experimental results and to theoretical values obtained within Born-Oppenheimer approximation (BOA) method.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024605
2023PO11 Acta Phys.Pol. B54, 9-A2 (2023) K.Pomorski, A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, M.Warda, A.Zdeb, J.Bartel, H.Molique, C.Schmitt, Z.G.Xiao, Y.J.Chen, L.L.Liu Fission Fragment Mass and Kinetic Energy Yields of Fermium Isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262Fm; analyzed available data; deduced the post-fission neutron multiplicities, potential energy surfaces.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.54.9-A2
2023WA08 Phys.Rev. C 107, L041601 (2023) Y.Wang, F.Guan, X.Diao, M.Wan, Y.Qin, Z.Qin, Q.Wu, D.Guo, D.Si, S.Xiao, B.Zhang, Y.Zhang, B.Tian, X.Wei, H.Yang, P.Ma, R.J.Hu, L.Duan, F.Duan, Q.Hu, J.Ma, S.Xu, Z.Bai, Y.Yang, J.Wang, W.Liu, W.Su, X.Wei, C.-W.Ma, X.Li, H.Wang, F.Wang, Y.Zhang, M.Warda, A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, L.Ou, Z.Xiao Observing the ping-pong modality of the isospin degree of freedom in cluster emission from heavy-ion reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(86Kr, X), E=25 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products, A=3 isobars in coincidence with the intermediate mass fragments of A=6-11; deduced velocity spectra of 3H and 3He, yields ratios of 3H/3He correlate reversely to the neutron-to-proton ratio N/Z of the intermediate mass fragments. Comparison with ImQMD transport model. Yield ratio 3H/3He exhibits evident anticorrelation with the N/Z of the latter, suggesting the ping-pong modality of the N/Z of the emitted particles. Anti-correlation shows dependence on the slope of the symmetry energy at saturation density. Compact Spectrometer for Heavy IoN Experiment (CSHINE) at the final focal plane of the Radioactive Ion Beam Line at Lanzhou (RIBLL-I).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.L041601
2022PO03 Eur.Phys.J. A 58, 77 (2022) K.Pomorski, A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, M.Warda, J.Bartel, Z.Xiao, Y.Chen, L.Liu, J.-L.Tian, X.Diao On the stability of superheavy nuclei
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00737-3
2021KO43 Chin.Phys.C 45, 124108 (2021) P.V.Kostryukov, A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, M.Warda, Z.Xia, Y.Chen, L.Liu, J.-L.Tian, K.Pomorski Potential energy surfaces and fission fragment mass yields of even-even superheavy nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 254,256,258,260,262Rf, 258,260,262,264,266Sg, 264,266,268,270,272Hs, 276,278,280,282,284Ds, 278,280,282,284,286Cn, 282,284,286,288,290Fl, 286,288,290,292,294Lv, 290,292,294,296,298Og, 294,296,298,300,302120; calculated potential energy surfaces. The Lublin-Strasbourg Drop (LSD) model.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac29a3
2021PO06 Chin.Phys.C 45, 054109 (2021) K.Pomorski, J.M.Blanco, P.V.Kostryukov, A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, M.Warda, Z.-G.Xiao, Y.-J.Chen Fission fragment mass yields of Th to Rf even-even nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238,240Th, 220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244,246U, 222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248,250Pu, 224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252Cm, 238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260Cf, 240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262Fm, 242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264No, 250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276Rf; calculated potential energy surfaces, fission barrier heights, fragment mass yields.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abec69
2020PO06 Eur.Phys.J. A 56, 107 (2020) K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, A.Dobrowolski, J.Bartel, C.M.Petrache Shape isomers in Pt, Hg and Pb isotopes with N ≤ 126
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00115-x
2020PO09 Phys.Rev. C 101, 064602 (2020) K.Pomorski, A.Dobrowolski, R.Han, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, M.Warda, Z.Xiao, Y.Chen, L.Liu, J.-L.Tian Mass yields of fission fragments of Pt to Ra isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202Pt, 172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202Hg, 174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204Pb, 176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206Po, 196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226Rn, 198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228Ra, 236,238,240,242,244,246Pu(SF); calculated fission fragment mass distributions using collective three-dimensional model with Fourier nuclear shape parametrization and coupling fission, neck and mass asymmetry modes. 184Hg; calculated potential energy surfaces in (q2, q3) and (q3, q4) planes by macroscopic-microscopic model based on the Lublin-Strasbourg drop macroscopic energy and Yukawa-folded single-particle potential. Comparison with experimental fission fragment mass yields for 180,182,184Hg, 194,196Po, 202,204,206,208Rn, and 210,212,214,216,218Ra.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.064602
2020WU10 Phys.Lett. B 811, 135865 (2020) Q.Wu, F.Guan, X.Diao, Y.Wang, Y.Zhang, Z.Li, X.Wu, A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, Z.Xiao Symmetry energy effect on emissions of light particles in coincidence with fast fission NUCLEAR REACTIONS 197Au(40Ar, F), E=30 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products; deduced the yield ratio of the coalescence-invariant neutrons (CIN) to the coalescence-invariant protons (CIP) in the fission events, significant dependence on the symmetry energy varying with density. Comparison with the Improved Quantum Molecular Dynamics Model (ImQMD) calculations.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135865
2018DO03 Phys.Rev. C 97, 024321 (2018) A.Dobrowolski, K.Mazurek, A.Gozdz Rotational bands in the quadrupole-octupole collective model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 156Dy; calculated levels, J, π, rotational bands, potential energy surfaces in (α20, α22), (α20, α30), (α20, α31), (α20, α32), (α20, α33) quadrupole and quadrupole-octupole planes, B(E2), B(E1), B(E2)/B(E1) ratios and Eγ values for transitions in ground-state and octupole bands. Quadrupole-octupole collective model with negative-parity one phonon-model bands based on four octupole deformations α30, α31, α32 and α33. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.024321
2017DO03 Acta Phys.Pol. B48, 565 (2017) A.Dobrowolski, A.Gozdz, K.Mazurek Influence of Dipole Deformations on Electric Transitions in 156Gd Nucleus NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 156Gd; calculated nuclear energy surface vs axial octupole and axial dipole gs deformation parameters, influence of the center-of-mass motion generated by octupole deformation connected with induced dipole deformations of 156Gd in its gs, B(E1) for specific transitions using quadrupole-octupole collective approach in presence of rotational motion. B(E1) values compared to data.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.48.565
2017ZD01 Phys.Rev. C 95, 054608 (2017) A.Zdeb, A.Dobrowolski, M.Warda Fission dynamics of 252Cf RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); calculated potential energy surface of 252Cf, tunneling probability, fission fragment mass distributions, mass yields from ground state to excited states, statistical mixing of eigenstates and fission fragment mass distributions. Time-dependent generator coordinate method with the gaussian overlap approximation (TDGCM+GOA) approach.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054608
2016DO09 Phys.Rev. C 94, 054322 (2016) A.Dobrowolski, K.Mazurek, A.Gozdz Consistent quadrupole-octupole collective model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 156Gd; calculated potential energy surfaces (PES), total energy in octupole planes, quadrupole versus octupole energy contours, profiles of total energy and mass tensor for ground state, levels, J, π, B(E2), B(E1). Collective Hamiltonian, and macroscopic-microscopic Strutinsky-like method with particle-number-projected BCS approach in vibrational, rotational, and nine-dimensional collective space. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.054322
2014SZ05 Phys.Scr. 89, 054033 (2014) A.Szulerecka, A.Dobrowolski, A.Gozdz Generalized projection operators for intrinsic rotation groups and nuclear collective models
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/89/5/054033
2013DO03 Acta Phys.Pol. B44, 333 (2013) A.Dobrowolski, A.Szulerecka, A.Gozdz Electric Transitions in Hypothetical Tetrahedral/Octahedral Bands NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 156Gd; calculated B(E1), B(E2). Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.44.333
2013DO10 Phys.Scr. T154, 014024 (2013) A.Dobrowolski, A.Gozdz, A.Szulerecka Electric transitions within the symmetrized tetrahedral and octahedral states
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T154/014024
2013DO11 Phys.Scr. T154, 014030 (2013) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Estimates of the light-particle transmission coefficients from hot, deformed and rotating nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE A=152-240; calculated average transmission coefficient for neutrons, protons and α-particles from deformed and excited nuclei.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T154/014030
2013UH01 Nucl.Phys. A913, 127 (2013) H.Uhrenholt, S.Aberg, A.Dobrowolski, Th.Dossing, T.Ichikawa, P.Moller Combinatorial nuclear level-density model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 60Co, 68Zn, 76,78,80,82,84,86Sr, 94Nb, 97,98Mo, 107,109,111,112,113,114,115,117Cd, 127Te, 148Pm, 148,149Sm, 155Eu, 161,162Dy, 166,167Er, 169,170,171,172,173,174,175,177Yb, 194Ir, 237U, 239Pu; calculated level density, angular momentum distribution, parity ratio, pairing gap. 90Zr, 90Nb; calculated J, π level density. A=20-255; calculated level density at neutron separation energy, vibrational enhancement. Combinatorial (microcanonical) model with folded Yukawa, pairing, rotational and vibrational states. Compared with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.06.002
2011DO04 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E20, 500 (2011) A.Dobrowolski, A.Gozdz, K.Mazurek, J.Dudek Tetrahedral symmetry in nuclei: New predictions based on the collective model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 156Dy; calculated potential energy surfaces, probability density distributions.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301311017910
2011GO01 Acta Phys.Pol. B42, 459 (2011) A.Gozdz, A.Szulerecka, A.Dobrowolski, J.Dudek Nuclear Collective Models and Partial Symmetries NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 156Gd, 156Dy; calculated quadrupole moments, B(E1), B(E2).
2011GO06 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E20, 199 (2011) A.Gozdz, A.Szulerecka, A.Dobrowolski, J.Dudek Symmetries in the intrinsic nuclear frames
doi: 10.1142/S0218301311017521
2011GO08 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E20, 565 (2011) A.Gozdz, A.Szulerecka, A.Dobrowolski The tetrahedral-octahedral bases for the generalized rotor
doi: 10.1142/S0218301311018010
2011NE05 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E20, 539 (2011) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, A.Dobrowolski Rotational states in heaviest isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 248,252,254,256Fm, 254No; calculated deformation energy, pairing strength, rotational energies, masses. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301311017971
2010DO06 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E19, 685 (2010) A.Dobrowolski, A.Gozdz, J.Dudek On a selection rule for electric transition in axially-symmetric nuclei
doi: 10.1142/S0218301310015102
2010DO07 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E19, 699 (2010) A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Rotational bands in heavy and superheavy nuclei within the Lublin Strasbourg Drop + Yukawa folded Model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 254No; calculated deformation energy, shell correction, moment of inertia, rotational energies.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301310015126
2010GO04 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E19, 621 (2010) A.Gozdz, A.Dobrowolski, J.Dudek, K.Mazurek Modeling the electromagnetic transitions in tetrahedral-symmetric nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 156Dy; calculated collective excitations, static quadrupole moment, B(E2).
doi: 10.1142/S0218301310015035
2010MO08 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E19, 633 (2010) H.Molique, J.Dudek, D.Curien, A.Gozdz, A.Dobrowolski Nuclear rotational-band interaction-mechanism revisited
doi: 10.1142/S0218301310015047
2009DO07 Acta Phys.Pol. B40, 705 (2009) A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Fission Barrier Heights of Medium Heavy and Heavy Nuclei
2009DU04 Acta Phys.Pol. B40, 713 (2009) J.Dudek, K.Mazurek, D.Curien, A.Dobrowolski, A.Gozdz, D.Hartley, A.Maj, L.Riedinger, N.Schunck Theory of Nuclear Stability Using Point GROUP Symmetries: Outline and Illustrations
2009GO21 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E18, 1028 (2009) A.Gozdz, M.Miskiewicz, J.Dudek, A.Dobrowolski Collective Hamiltonians with tetrahedral symmetry: formalism and general features
doi: 10.1142/S0218301309013191
2008DO07 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E17, 81 (2008) A.Dobrowolski, H.Goutte, J.-F.Berger Collective-dynamics effects in fission of 256, 258Fm isotopes NUCLEAR REACTIONS 256,258Fm(n, F), E not given; calculated fragment mass distribution using Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov method.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301308009574
2008NE02 Acta Phys.Pol. B39, 417 (2008) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel, A.Dobrowolski Nuclear Level Density Parameter
2007BA18 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E16, 459 (2007) J.Bartel, A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski Saddle-point masses of even-even actinide nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 232,234Th, 234,236,238,240U, 236,238,240,242,244,246Pu, 242,244,246,248,250Cm, 250Cf; calculated fission barrier energies, inner and outer saddle point masses. Modified funny-hills shape parameterization.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301307005892
2007DO03 Phys.Rev. C 75, 024613 (2007) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Fission barriers in a macroscopic-microscopic model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 232,234Th, 236,238U, 236,240Pu, 272Ds, 298Fl; calculated fission barriers. Macroscopic-microscopic model, four-dimensional shape parameterization.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.75.024613
2007DO06 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E16, 431 (2007) A.Dobrowolski, H.Goutte, J.-F.Berger Microscopic determinations of fission barriers (mean-field and beyond) NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 226Th, 238U; calculated potential energy vs deformation, fission barrier features.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301307005867
2006DO05 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E15, 432 (2006) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Importance of mass asymmetry and nonaxiality for the description of fission barriers NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 232,234Th, 236,240U, 236,246Pu, 248Cm, 250Cf; calculated fission barrier heights, role of mass asymmetry and non-axial deformation.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301306004314
2006DO27 Phys.Scr. T125, 189 (2006) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Influence of different proton and neutron deformations on fission barriers NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 240Pu, 298Fl; calculated total energy vs deformation.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2006/T125/044
2005DO08 Acta Phys.Pol. B36, 1373 (2005) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Dependence of fusion barrier heights on the difference of proton and neutron radii NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(16O, X), E not given; calculated fusion barrier heights, dependence on neutron and proton radii. Semiclassical extended Thomas-Fermi approach, Skyrme interaction.
2005DO10 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E14, 457 (2005) A.Dobrowolski, J.Bartel, K.Pomorski Influence of different proton and neutron deformations on nuclear energies NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 232,238U, 240Pu, 270Hs, 272Ds; calculated energy vs deformation. Yukawa-folded model, shell corrections.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301305003272
2004DO01 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E13, 309 (2004) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Mean-field description of heavy-ion collisions
doi: 10.1142/S0218301304002107
2003DO20 Nucl.Phys. A729, 713 (2003) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Mean-field description of fusion barriers with Skyrme's interaction NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(50Ti, X), 232Th(48Ca, X), E not given; calculated fusion barrier distributions. Z=108-114; calculated fusion barrier heights for reactions leading to superheavy isotopes. Extended Thomas-Fermi method, Skyrme interaction.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.09.008
2003DO22 Acta Phys.Pol. B34, 2457 (2003) A.Dobrowolski, M.Kowal, K.Pomorski Fusion barriers derived from the Hartree-Fock functional with Skyrme interactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(50Ti, X), 208Pb(76Ge, X), E not given; calculated fusion barrier features. Other reactions leading to Z=114 discussed.
2002DO03 Phys.Rev. C65, 041306 (2002) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Liquid Drop Model with Different Neutron versus Proton Deformations NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 98Zr, 146Nd, 150,158,166Dy, 208Pb; calculated binding energies vs neutron-proton deformation difference. Liquid drop model.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.65.041306
Back to query form |