NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of March 21, 2024. Search: Author = K.Pomorski Found 186 matches. Showing 1 to 100. [Next]2023GU05 Phys.Rev. C 107, 034307 (2023) X.Guan, T.-C.Wang, W.-Q.Jiang, Y.Su, Y.-J.Chen, K.Pomorski Impact of the pairing interaction on fission of U isotopes NUCLEAR REACTIONS 232,233,234,235,236,238U(n, F), E=thermal; calculated fragment mass distribution, total kinetic energy distribution. Deformed mean-field plus standard pairing model. Comparison to experimental data and ENDF/B-VIII.0. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 236U; calculated potential-energy surface, static fission path, prescission point, scission process point, asymmetric and symmetric scission points, neutron and proton pairing interaction energy. 231,232,233,234,235,236,238,239,240U; calculated fission barrier height. Comparison to experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.034307
2023PO07 Phys.Rev. C 107, 054616 (2023) K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, C.Schmitt, Z.G.Xiao, Y.J.Chen, L.L.Liu Fourier-over-spheroid shape parametrization applied to nuclear fission dynamics NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E = thermal; calculated fission fragments mass and charge yields, total kinetic energy (TKE) of fission fragments, post-fission neutron multiplicities, fission fragment excitation energy. 3D Langevin code, based on the Fourier-over-spheroid (FoS) shape parametrization, the LSD+Yukawa folded macroscopic-microscopic potential energy landscape, a procedure to account for charge equilibration at scission, and a method to compute the excitation energy available in the primary fragments. Comparison to experimental data. RADIOACTIVITY 246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262Fm(SF); calculated fission fragment mass yields distribution, total kinetic energy (TKE) of fission fragments, post-fission neutron multiplicities. Comparison to experimental data. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 236U, 252,254,256,258,260,262Fm; calculated potential energy surfaces. 240Pu; calculated energy at scission as a function of the heavy fragment charge number, Wigner distribution probability of the fission fragment charge number.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.054616
2023PO11 Acta Phys.Pol. B54, 9-A2 (2023) K.Pomorski, A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, M.Warda, A.Zdeb, J.Bartel, H.Molique, C.Schmitt, Z.G.Xiao, Y.J.Chen, L.L.Liu Fission Fragment Mass and Kinetic Energy Yields of Fermium Isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262Fm; analyzed available data; deduced the post-fission neutron multiplicities, potential energy surfaces.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.54.9-A2
2023WA08 Phys.Rev. C 107, L041601 (2023) Y.Wang, F.Guan, X.Diao, M.Wan, Y.Qin, Z.Qin, Q.Wu, D.Guo, D.Si, S.Xiao, B.Zhang, Y.Zhang, B.Tian, X.Wei, H.Yang, P.Ma, R.J.Hu, L.Duan, F.Duan, Q.Hu, J.Ma, S.Xu, Z.Bai, Y.Yang, J.Wang, W.Liu, W.Su, X.Wei, C.-W.Ma, X.Li, H.Wang, F.Wang, Y.Zhang, M.Warda, A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, L.Ou, Z.Xiao Observing the ping-pong modality of the isospin degree of freedom in cluster emission from heavy-ion reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(86Kr, X), E=25 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products, A=3 isobars in coincidence with the intermediate mass fragments of A=6-11; deduced velocity spectra of 3H and 3He, yields ratios of 3H/3He correlate reversely to the neutron-to-proton ratio N/Z of the intermediate mass fragments. Comparison with ImQMD transport model. Yield ratio 3H/3He exhibits evident anticorrelation with the N/Z of the latter, suggesting the ping-pong modality of the N/Z of the emitted particles. Anti-correlation shows dependence on the slope of the symmetry energy at saturation density. Compact Spectrometer for Heavy IoN Experiment (CSHINE) at the final focal plane of the Radioactive Ion Beam Line at Lanzhou (RIBLL-I).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.L041601
2022PO03 Eur.Phys.J. A 58, 77 (2022) K.Pomorski, A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, M.Warda, J.Bartel, Z.Xiao, Y.Chen, L.Liu, J.-L.Tian, X.Diao On the stability of superheavy nuclei
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00737-3
2021KO43 Chin.Phys.C 45, 124108 (2021) P.V.Kostryukov, A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, M.Warda, Z.Xia, Y.Chen, L.Liu, J.-L.Tian, K.Pomorski Potential energy surfaces and fission fragment mass yields of even-even superheavy nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 254,256,258,260,262Rf, 258,260,262,264,266Sg, 264,266,268,270,272Hs, 276,278,280,282,284Ds, 278,280,282,284,286Cn, 282,284,286,288,290Fl, 286,288,290,292,294Lv, 290,292,294,296,298Og, 294,296,298,300,302120; calculated potential energy surfaces. The Lublin-Strasbourg Drop (LSD) model.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac29a3
2021LI21 Phys.Rev. C 103, 044601 (2021) L.-L.Liu, Y.-J.Chen, X.-Z.Wu, Z.-X.Li, Z.-G.Ge, K.Pomorski Analysis of nuclear fission properties with the Langevin approach in Fourier shape parametrization NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E=14 MeV; calculated deformation energy contour for 236U in (q2, q3) plane, total kinetic energy (TKE) as function of the heavy fission fragment, mass distribution of fission fragments, mass-energy correlation of the fission fragments, correlations between the distance of the mass centers of two fragments and the heavy fragment mass at the scission point, correlation between neck parameter and the elongation parameter at the scission point. 233,236,238U, 239Pu(n, F), E=14 MeV; calculated fragment mass distributions, total kinetic energy (TKE) and the probability distributions. Langevin approach for nuclear fission within the Fourier shape parametrization, with the potential energy from macroscopic-microscopic model based on Lublin-Strasbourg drop model and Yukawa-folded potential. Comparison with experimental data, and with evaluated data in ENDF/B-VIII.0.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.044601
2021PO06 Chin.Phys.C 45, 054109 (2021) K.Pomorski, J.M.Blanco, P.V.Kostryukov, A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, M.Warda, Z.-G.Xiao, Y.-J.Chen Fission fragment mass yields of Th to Rf even-even nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238,240Th, 220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244,246U, 222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248,250Pu, 224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252Cm, 238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260Cf, 240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262Fm, 242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264No, 250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276Rf; calculated potential energy surfaces, fission barrier heights, fragment mass yields.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abec69
2020PO06 Eur.Phys.J. A 56, 107 (2020) K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, A.Dobrowolski, J.Bartel, C.M.Petrache Shape isomers in Pt, Hg and Pb isotopes with N ≤ 126
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00115-x
2020PO09 Phys.Rev. C 101, 064602 (2020) K.Pomorski, A.Dobrowolski, R.Han, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, M.Warda, Z.Xiao, Y.Chen, L.Liu, J.-L.Tian Mass yields of fission fragments of Pt to Ra isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202Pt, 172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202Hg, 174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204Pb, 176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206Po, 196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226Rn, 198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228Ra, 236,238,240,242,244,246Pu(SF); calculated fission fragment mass distributions using collective three-dimensional model with Fourier nuclear shape parametrization and coupling fission, neck and mass asymmetry modes. 184Hg; calculated potential energy surfaces in (q2, q3) and (q3, q4) planes by macroscopic-microscopic model based on the Lublin-Strasbourg drop macroscopic energy and Yukawa-folded single-particle potential. Comparison with experimental fission fragment mass yields for 180,182,184Hg, 194,196Po, 202,204,206,208Rn, and 210,212,214,216,218Ra.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.064602
2020WU10 Phys.Lett. B 811, 135865 (2020) Q.Wu, F.Guan, X.Diao, Y.Wang, Y.Zhang, Z.Li, X.Wu, A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, Z.Xiao Symmetry energy effect on emissions of light particles in coincidence with fast fission NUCLEAR REACTIONS 197Au(40Ar, F), E=30 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products; deduced the yield ratio of the coalescence-invariant neutrons (CIN) to the coalescence-invariant protons (CIP) in the fission events, significant dependence on the symmetry energy varying with density. Comparison with the Improved Quantum Molecular Dynamics Model (ImQMD) calculations.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135865
2019PO10 Acta Phys.Pol. B50, 535 (2019) K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, J.Bartel, C.Schmitt On the Properies of Super-heavy Even-Even Nuclei Around 294Og NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 288,290,292Lv, 290,292,294Og, 296,298,300120; calculated potential energy surfaces. Four-dimensional Fourier parametrization of nuclear shapes, combined with the macroscopic-microscopic approach of the potential energy based on the Lublin-Strasbourg drop and microscopic shell and pairing corrections.
doi: 10.5506/aphyspolb.50.535
2018PO05 Phys.Rev. C 97, 034319 (2018) K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, J.Bartel, C.Schmitt Stability of superheavy nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 280Ds, 276Cn, 268,270,272Hs, 264,266,268Sg, 258,260,262,264Rf, 254,256,258Fm, 252Cf; calculated deformation energy surfaces in (q2, q3), (q3, q4), (q2, η) and (q4, η) planes. Z=94-126, N-Z=42-72; calculated values of the collective coordinates η, q2, q3 and q4 at equilibrium deformation, ground-state microscopic contribution to the potential energy, fission barrier heights. Comparison to available experimental data. Four-dimensional Fourier parametrization of nuclear shapes, combined with the macroscopic-microscopic approach of the potential energy based on the Lublin-Strasbourg drop and microscopic shell and pairing corrections. RADIOACTIVITY 230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258Pu, 232,234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262Cm, 238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266Cf, 242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270Fm, 246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274No, 250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278Rf, 254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282Sg, 258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286Hs, 262,264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290Ds, 266,268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294Cn, 270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298Fl, 274,276,278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302Lv, 278,280,282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306Og, 282,284,286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308,310120, 286,288,290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308,310,312,314122, 290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308,310,312,314,316,318124(α); calculated Q(α) and α-decay half-lives using Gamow-type WKB approach, and compared with available experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034319
2017NE02 Acta Phys.Pol. B48, 451 (2017) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel, C.Schmitt Potential Energy Surfaces of Thorium Isotopes in the 4D Fourier Parametrisation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 218,220,222,224,226,230Th; calculated potential energy surface, deformation. 210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,230,232,234,236,238Th; calculated gs and superdeformed quadrupole moment. Fourier shape parameterization. Detailed studies in progress. Quadrupole moments compared with available data.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.48.451
2017NE03 Eur.Phys.J. A 53, 67 (2017) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel, C.Schmitt On possible shape isomers in the Pt-Ra region of nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192Pt, 178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194Hg, 180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208Pb, 194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210Po, 196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212Rn, 208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236Ra; calculated deformation, potential surface, gs energy, shape isomeric minima, electric quadrupole moment using macroscopic-microscopic model based on Lublin-Strasbourg Drop model; deduced possibility of isomers, rapidly converging shape parameterization. Compared with available data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2017-12259-8
2017PO05 Acta Phys.Pol. B48, 541 (2017) K.Pomorski, J.Bartel, B.Nerlo-Pomorska On Jacobi and Poincare Shape Transitions in Rotating Nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 46Ti, 120Cd; calculated potential energy surface, mass excess, deformation for different angular momenta of rotating nuclei using LSD (Lublin-Strasbourg Drop) model iwith two additional deformation degrees of freedom of higher multipolarity and without microscopic corrections; deduced no sign of Poincare shape transition.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.48.541
2017PO06 Eur.Phys.J. A 53, 59 (2017) K.Pomorski, F.A.Ivanyuk, B.Nerlo-Pomorska Mass distribution of fission fragments within the Born-Oppenheimer approximation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 236U; calculated potential energy surface, deformation of fissioning nucleus, neck radius, fission probability using approximate solution of collective Hamiltonian describing the fission process. Compared to data. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, f), E=thermal; calculated fission fragment yields using approximate solution of collective Hamiltonian describing the fission process. Compared to data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2017-12250-5
2017PO08 Phys.Scr. 92, 064006 (2017) K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, J.Bartel Fourier expansion of deformed nuclear shapes expressed as the deviation from a spheroid NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 238U; analyzed available data; deduced a Fourier decomposition of nuclear shapes to cover a very wide range of nuclear deformations up to the scission point.
doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/aa7002
2017SC05 Phys.Rev. C 95, 034612 (2017) C.Schmitt, K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, J.Bartel Performance of the Fourier shape parametrization for the fission process RADIOACTIVITY Z=78-94(SF); 178,180,184,192Hg, 194,196,202,210Po, 228Ra, 218,222,226,228,230,232,234,236Th, 238,240,242,246Pu(SF); calculated potential energy contours and fission paths, fission valleys, and exotic ground and metastable states for 100 even-even nuclei from Pt to Pu. Macroscopic-microscopic approach, employing a four-dimensional (4D) nuclear shape parametrization based on Fourier expansion, and realistic potential-energy prescription.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.034612
2016NE05 Acta Phys.Pol. B47, 943 (2016) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel On the Possibility to Observe New Shape Isomers in the Po-Th Region NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 188,192,196,200,204,208,212,216,220Po; calculated deformation-energy landscapes, rotational energies, charge quadrupole moments.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.47.943
2016PO04 52, 144 (2016) Remarks on the nuclear shell-correction method NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 88Sr; calculated smoothed single-particle level density for neutrons and protons using 3D harmonic oscillator and HFB with Gogny force, shell energy corrections using traditional Strutinsky approach and using smoothing over the particle number. Z=36-42; calculated neutron and proton sp levels, J using HFB with Gogny force.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16144-8
2016ZD01 Eur.Phys.J. A 52, 323 (2016) A.Zdeb, M.Warda, C.M.Petrache, K.Pomorski Proton emission half-lives within a Gamow-like model RADIOACTIVITY 109I, 113Cs, 131Eu, 145,146,147Tm, 155,156,157Ta, 160,161Re, 166,167Ir, 170,171Au, 177Tl, 141Ho, 146,147Tm, 150,151Lu, 156Ta, 161Re, 166Ir, 177Tl(p); calculated proton emission T1/2 using simple phenomenological Gamow-like formalism; deduced nuclear radius constant parameter. Compared with other formalisms and with data. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 109I, 131Eu, 177Tl; calculated levels, J, π.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16323-7
2015BA48 Phys.Scr. 90, 114004 (2015) J.Bartel, K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, C.Schmitt Fission properties of Po isotopes in different macroscopic-microscopic models RADIOACTIVITY 212Po, Po(SF); calculated fission-barrier heights of nuclei in the Po isotopic chain. Yukawa-folded single-particle potential, the Lublin-Strasbourg drop (LSD) model.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/90/11/114004
2015NE15 Phys.Scr. 90, 114010 (2015) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, C.Schmitt, J.Bartel Potential energy surfaces of Polonium isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 188,192,196,200,204,208,212,216,220Po; calculated total deformation energy, potential energy surfaces. Lublin-Strasbourg drop model and the Yukawa-folded single-particle energies.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/90/11/114010
2015PO05 Phys.Rev. C 91, 054605 (2015) K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, P.Quentin b decay of 252Cf in the transition from the exit point to scission RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF), (β-); calculated branching ratio for rare Fermi β- decay for 252Cf during the spontaneous fission process up to the scission point, nuclear dissipation. Classical dynamical approach. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 252Cf; calculated potential energy surface contours, Proton and neutron single-particle levels in the ground state and at the scission point. Macroscopic-microscopic calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.054605
2015PO08 Phys.Scr. 90, 114013 (2015) On spontaneous fission and α-decay half-lives of atomic nuclei RADIOACTIVITY Te, I, Xe, Sm, Gd, Lu, Hf, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, Au, Hg, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Tl, Rn, Pb, Fr, Bi, Ra, Po, Ac, At, Th, Pa, U, Np, Pu, Am, Cm, Bk, Cf, Fm, Md, No, Lr, Rf, Db, Sg, Bh, Hs, Ds, Mt(α), (SF); calculated T1/2. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/90/11/114013
2015ZD01 Acta Phys.Pol. B46, 423 (2015) On Systematics of Spontaneous Fission Half-lives RADIOACTIVITY Th, U, Pu, Cm, Cf, Fm, No(SF); analyzed available data; deduced T1/2 systematics.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.46.423
2014BA10 Phys.Scr. 89, 054003 (2014) J.Bartel, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, C.Schmitt The potential energy surface of 240Pu around scission NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 240Pu; analyzed potential energy surface within the macroscopic-microscopic approach; deduced effect of strong neutron shell corrections on mass distributions.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/89/5/054003
2014NE03 Phys.Scr. 89, 054004 (2014) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, P.Quentin, J.Bartel Rotational bands in well deformed heavy nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 230,232Th, 234,236,238U, 240,242Pu, 246Cm, 252No; calculated energy levels, J, π, rotational bands. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/89/5/054004
2014NE17 Phys.Scr. 89, 054031 (2014) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, C.Schmitt, J.Bartel Low-energy fission within the Lublin-Strasbourg drop and Yukawa folded model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 180,198Hg, 234U, 240Pu, 260Fm; calculated fission potential energy surface. 222,228Th; calculated potential energy for symmetric and asymmetric fission paths. Macroscopic (Lublin-Strasbourg drop) - microscopic (BCS with Yukawa force) method.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/89/5/054031
2014ZD01 Acta Phys.Pol. B45, 303 (2014) Alpha Decay Half-lives for Super-heavy Nuclei Within a Gamow-like Model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=100-122; calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.45.303
2014ZD02 Phys.Scr. 89, 054015 (2014) Half-lives of heavy nuclei within simple phenomenological models COMPILATION Th, Pa, U, Np, Pu, Am, Cm, Bk, Cf, Es, Fm, Md, No, Lr(SF), (α); compiled, analyzed T1/2; deduced simple formula for T1/2.Compared with available data.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/89/5/054015
2013BA24 Phys.Scr. T154, 014022 (2013) About the existence of a Poincare transition in rotating nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 92Mo, 46Ti, 240Pu; calculated deformation energy, instability of nuclear shapes with respect to reflection asymmetric distortions. Lublin-Strasbourg drop model and the modified Funny-Hills shape parametrization.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T154/014022
2013DO11 Phys.Scr. T154, 014030 (2013) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Estimates of the light-particle transmission coefficients from hot, deformed and rotating nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE A=152-240; calculated average transmission coefficient for neutrons, protons and α-particles from deformed and excited nuclei.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T154/014030
2013IV04 Phys.Scr. T154, 014021 (2013) On the Poincare instability of a rotating liquid drop NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 58Ni; calculated yrast lines and dependencies; deduced break-up of reflection symmetric shapes appears in light nuclei at high angular momenta when non-axial degrees of freedom are taken into account. The optimal shape theory of Strutinsky.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T154/014021
2013NE05 Phys.Scr. T154, 014026 (2013) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, C.Schmitt Potential energy landscapes of Th isotopes within the Lublin Strasbourg drop + Yukawa-folded model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 220,226Th, 208Pb; calculated potential energy surfaces in a four-dimensional deformation space. Lublin Strasbourg drop model, Yukawa-folded potential.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T154/014026
2013NE06 Phys.Scr. T154, 014028 (2013) Masses and rotational energies of the heaviest nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=88-112; calculated ground-state masses of even-even nuclei, pairing strengths, 226Ra, 248Cm, 278Cn. Lublin Strasbourg drop mass formula for the macroscopic part and the Yukawa-folded single-particle potential.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T154/014028
2013PO03 Phys.Scr. T154, 014023 (2013) Fission-barrier heights in some newest liquid-drop models NUCLEAR STRUCTURE A=230, 232, 236, 238, 240, 242, 244, 246, 248, 250; calculated fission-barrier heights, different parameters. Lublin-Strasbourg drop (LSD) model, comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T154/014023
2013ZD01 Phys.Rev. C 87, 024308 (2013) Half-lives for α and cluster radioactivity within a Gamow-like model RADIOACTIVITY 188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,206,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218Po, 193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,207,209,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220At, 195,196,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222Rn, 200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221Fr, 202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,226Ra, 206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225Ac, 209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,232Th, 212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,223,224,225,226,227,231Pa, 217,218,219,223,225,226,227,228,229,230,232,233,234,235,236,238U, 226,227,229,230,231,237Np, 229,230,232,234,236,237,238,239,240,242,244Pu, 241,243Am, 234,238,240,242,243,244,245,246,247,248Cm, 247Bk, 240,242,243,244,245,246,248,249,250,251,252Cf, 243,245,247,252,253,254Es, 243,246,247,248,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257Fm, 246,248,249,255,256,257,258Md, 252,253,254,255,256,257,259No, 253,255,257,258Lr, 255,257,259,261Rf, 257,259,260,262Db, 260,265Sg, 261,262Bh, 265,266Hs, 266Mt, 269,270,271,273,281Ds(α); 221Fr, 221,222,223,224,226Ra, 223,225Ac(14C); 223Ac(15N), 226Th(18O); 228Th(20O); 230U(22Ne); 231Pa(23F); 230,232Th, 231Pa, 232,233,234,235,236U(24Ne); 233,235U(25Ne); 232Th, 234,236U(26Ne); 233,234,236U, 236,238Pu(28Mg); 236U, 237Np, 238Pu(30Mg); 238Pu(32Si); 240Pu, 241Am, 242Cm(34Si); calculated T1/2 for α decay and cluster emissions. Phenomenological model based on Gamow theory with WKB approximation for the penetration of Coulomb barrier. Comparison with experimental values of half-lives.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.024308
2013ZD02 Phys.Scr. T154, 014029 (2013) Half-lives for α and cluster radioactivity in a simple model RADIOACTIVITY 221Fr, 221,222,223,224,226Ra, 225Ac(14C), 226Th(18O), 228Th(20O), 230Th(24Ne), 230U(22Ne), 231Pa(23F), (24Ne), 232Th(24Ne), (25Ne), 232U(24Ne), 233U(24Ne), (25Ne), (28Mg), 234U(24Ne), (25Ne), (28Mg), 235U(24Ne), (25Ne), 236U(24Ne), (25Ne), (28Mg), (30Mg), 236Pu(28Mg), 237Np(30Mg), 238Pu(28Mg), (30Mg), (32Si), 240Pu(34Si), 241Am(34Si), 242Cm(34Si); calculated cluster radioactivity T1/2. Simple phenomenological model based on the WKB theory, comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T154/014029
2012BA22 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E21, 1250023 (2012) J.Bartel, K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska Light-Particle Emission From Fissioning Hot Rotating Nuclei RADIOACTIVITY 160Yb(n), (p), (α); calculated energy spectra of neutrons, protons and alpha particles, En, In, Ep, Ip, Eα, Iα. 208Pb; deduced nuclear potential.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301312500231
2012IV02 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E21, 1250032 (2012) F.Ivanyuk, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel The shape transitions in rotating nuclei
doi: 10.1142/S0218301312500322
2012NE04 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E21, 1250050 (2012) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Dynamical coupling of rotation with the pairing field in heavy nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 230,232,234,236,238,240U, 242,246,248Cm, 248,250,252,254No; calculated level energies, J, π, rotational bands. Macroscopic-macroscopic model with the Lublin-Strasbourg Drop, the Yukawa-folded single-particle potential, comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301312500504
2011BA11 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E20, 333 (2011) Investigations on the breaking of left-right symmetry in light nuclei-the Poincare instability NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 44Ti, 64Zn, 76Se, 80Kr, 84Sr, 88Mo; calculated deformation energy, parameters of the Lublin-Strasbourg-Drop model.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301311017697
2011NE05 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E20, 539 (2011) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, A.Dobrowolski Rotational states in heaviest isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 248,252,254,256Fm, 254No; calculated deformation energy, pairing strength, rotational energies, masses. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301311017971
2011NE09 Phys.Rev. C 84, 044310 (2011) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Rotational states and masses of heavy and superheavy nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=88-112, N=136-170; calculated nuclear masses, rotational bands, single particle levels, potential energy surfaces, deformation energies. 238Cm; calculated energy and moment of inertia contour plots on c, h plane. 238Cm, 236U; calculated Cross section of the potential energies as function of the mass-asymmetry deformation parameter. 230,232U, 236,244Pu, 242,246,248Cm, 248,250Fm, 252,254No; calculated rotational bands. Lublin-Strasbourg drop (LSD), Strutinsky shell-correction method, Yukawa-folded (YF) mean-field potential, BCS approach for pairing correlations. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.044310
2011PO03 Acta Phys.Pol. B42, 455 (2011) K.Pomorski, F.Ivanyuk, J.Bartel On Optimal Shapes of Fissioning and Rotating Nuclei
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.42.455
2011PO05 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E20, 316 (2011) K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, J.Bartel Microscopic energy corrections at the scission configuration RADIOACTIVITY 236U(SF); calculated shell energy, single-particle potential, fission fragments, microscopic fission barrier.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301311017673
2010BA10 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E19, 601 (2010) J.Bartel, F.Ivanyuk, K.Pomorski On Poincare instability of rotating stars and nuclei
doi: 10.1142/S0218301310015011
2010DO07 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E19, 699 (2010) A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Rotational bands in heavy and superheavy nuclei within the Lublin Strasbourg Drop + Yukawa folded Model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 254No; calculated deformation energy, shell correction, moment of inertia, rotational energies.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301310015126
2010IV01 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E19, 514 (2010) The fission barriers of heavy and exotic nuclei
doi: 10.1142/S0218301310014923
2009BA33 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E18, 986 (2009) J.Bartel, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski Jacobi bifurcation in hot rotating nuclei with a LSD + Yukawa folded approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 88Mo; calculated deformation energy surfaces for excited nuclei.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301309013130
2009DO07 Acta Phys.Pol. B40, 705 (2009) A.Dobrowolski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Fission Barrier Heights of Medium Heavy and Heavy Nuclei
2009IV01 Phys.Rev. C 79, 054327 (2009) Optimal shapes and fission barriers of nuclei within the liquid drop model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=35-110; calculated fission barriers, shapes and heights using Lublin-Strasbourg drop model calculations. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.054327
2009NE01 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E18, 123 (2009) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, F.Ivanyuk Remarks on the nuclear shell-correction method NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 40Ca, 132Sn; calculated single particle energies, shell corrections.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301309012070
2009NE08 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E18, 1099 (2009) Simple tool to search quasi-magic structures in deformed nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 264Hs; calculated level energies, deformation, quasi-magic structures.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301309013324
2009PO08 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E18, 900 (2009) Pairing correlations and fission barrier heights NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 75Br, 90,92,94,98Mo, 171,173Lu, 213At, 228Ra, 252Cf; calculated fission barriers using Lublin-Strasbourg drop model and folded Yukawa single-particle potential, compared to data, shown influence of pairing energy.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301309013026
2008BA12 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E17, 100 (2008) Jacobi shape transitions within the LSD model and the Skyrme-ETF approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 90Zr, 154Sm, 232Th, 240Pu; calculated Modified Funny-Hills shape parameterization for fission process using Lublin-Strasbourg Drop Model.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301308009598
2008NE02 Acta Phys.Pol. B39, 417 (2008) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel, A.Dobrowolski Nuclear Level Density Parameter
2008PO01 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E17, 245 (2008) Role of the zero-point corrections in fission dynamics NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 148Ce, 250Fm; calculated spontaneous fission half-lives, fission probabilities using Cranking and generator coordinate method (WKB approximation).
doi: 10.1142/S0218301308009756
2007BA18 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E16, 459 (2007) J.Bartel, A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski Saddle-point masses of even-even actinide nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 232,234Th, 234,236,238,240U, 236,238,240,242,244,246Pu, 242,244,246,248,250Cm, 250Cf; calculated fission barrier energies, inner and outer saddle point masses. Modified funny-hills shape parameterization.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301307005892
2007DO03 Phys.Rev. C 75, 024613 (2007) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Fission barriers in a macroscopic-microscopic model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 232,234Th, 236,238U, 236,240Pu, 272Ds, 298Fl; calculated fission barriers. Macroscopic-microscopic model, four-dimensional shape parameterization.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.75.024613
2007NE02 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E16, 328 (2007) On the average pairing energy in nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 232,234Th, 240,246Pu, 236U, 246Cm; calculated pairing energy vs deformation.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301307005764
2007NE03 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E16, 474 (2007) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, M.Zwierzchowska Predictions of nuclear masses in different models ATOMIC MASSES Z=8-112; analyzed masses. Comparison of Lublin-Strasbourg drop and Thomas-Fermi approaches.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301307005909
2007PO01 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E16, 237 (2007) Pairing as a collective mode NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 240Pu; calculated pairing strength. 132,134Ba, 118,120,124,126,128,130Xe; calculated 0+ states energies. 104Ru; calculated rotational bands level energies, B(E2). 236,238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254Cm, 242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258Cf, 240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260Fm, 248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262No; calculated spontaneous fission T1/2. Collective pairing Hamiltonian.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301307005685
2007PO02 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E16, 566 (2007) K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska, J.Bartel Nuclear level density parameter with Yukawa folded potential NUCLEAR STRUCTURE O, Ca, Sr, Sn, Sm, Pb, Th; calculated level density parameters. 40Ca, 50Cr, 100Ru, 150Sm, 200Hg, 250Cf; calculated level density parameters vs deformation. Yukawa folded potential.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301307006009
2007SO01 Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys. 58, 292 (2007) Description of structure and properties of superheavy nuclei
doi: 10.10106/j.ppnp.2006.05.001
2006BA12 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E15, 478 (2006) J.Bartel, K.Pomorski, B.Nerlo-Pomorska Nuclear level density at finite temperatures NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=8-82; A=16-224; calculated single-particle level densities vs temperature. Selfconsistent mean-field approach.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301306004399
2006DO05 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E15, 432 (2006) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Importance of mass asymmetry and nonaxiality for the description of fission barriers NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 232,234Th, 236,240U, 236,246Pu, 248Cm, 250Cf; calculated fission barrier heights, role of mass asymmetry and non-axial deformation.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301306004314
2006DO27 Phys.Scr. T125, 189 (2006) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Influence of different proton and neutron deformations on fission barriers NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 240Pu, 298Fl; calculated total energy vs deformation.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2006/T125/044
2006NE02 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E15, 471 (2006) Pairing energy obtained by folding in the nucleon number space
doi: 10.1142/S0218301306004387
2006NE07 Phys.Rev. C 74, 034327 (2006) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Shell energy and the level-density parameter of hot nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 40Ca, 50Cr, 100Ru, 150Sm, 200Hg, 250Cf; calculated level density parameters, shell-correction energy vs temperature. Macroscopic-microscopic approach.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.034327
2006PO03 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E15, 417 (2006) Fission dynamics in the four-dimensional deformation space NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 232Th; calculated fission barrier, related features.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301306004296
2006PO04 Acta Phys.Pol. B37, 101 (2006) Shell correction and particle-phonon coupling NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 16O, 40,48Ca, 56Ni, 90Zr, 208Pb; calculated shell correction energies, effect of coupling to shape vibration.
2006PO17 Phys.Scr. T125, 21 (2006) Shell and pairing energies obtained by folding in N space NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb; N=20-200; calculated shell and pairing energies vs deformation. Modified Strutinsky method.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2006/T125/005
2006SR01 Nucl.Phys. A766, 25 (2006) J.Srebrny, T.Czosnyka, Ch.Droste, S.G.Rohozinski, L.Prochniak, K.Zajac, K.Pomorski, D.Cline, C.Y.Wu, A.Backlin, L.Hasselgren, R.M.Diamond, D.Habs, H.J.Korner, F.S.Stephens, C.Baktash, R.P.Kostecki Experimental and theoretical investigations of quadrupole collective degrees of freedom in 104Ru NUCLEAR REACTIONS 104Ru(208Pb, 208Pb'), E=954 MeV; 104Ru(136Xe, 136Xe'), E=525 MeV; 104Ru(58Ni, 58Ni'), E=165, 190 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, (particle)γ -coin following Coulomb excitation. 104Ru deduced levels, J, π, E2 and M1 matrix elements, quadrupole collectivity. Comparison with model predictions.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.11.013
2005DO08 Acta Phys.Pol. B36, 1373 (2005) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Dependence of fusion barrier heights on the difference of proton and neutron radii NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(16O, X), E not given; calculated fusion barrier heights, dependence on neutron and proton radii. Semiclassical extended Thomas-Fermi approach, Skyrme interaction.
2005DO10 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E14, 457 (2005) A.Dobrowolski, J.Bartel, K.Pomorski Influence of different proton and neutron deformations on nuclear energies NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 232,238U, 240Pu, 270Hs, 272Ds; calculated energy vs deformation. Yukawa-folded model, shell corrections.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301305003272
2005MO14 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E14, 499 (2005) H.Molique, J.Dudek, K.Pomorski The particle conserving shell correction method and the nuclear zero-point motion NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 16O, 40,48Ca, 56Ni, 90Zr, 208Pb; calculated shell energy reduction due to dynamical averaging.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301305003338
2005NE09 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E14, 505 (2005) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Sykut, J.Bartel Temperature dependence of the nuclear energy in relativistic mean-field theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE A=16-224; analyzed level densities, temperature-dependent shell corrections.
doi: 10.1142/S021830130500334X
2005PO06 Acta Phys.Pol. B36, 1221 (2005) Nuclear shell energy obtained by averaging in particle-number space NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb; calculated shell-correction energies.
2005PO08 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E14, 485 (2005) Shell and pairing energies obtained by folding in the particle number space
doi: 10.1142/S0218301305003314
2005WA13 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E14, 403 (2005) M.Warda, K.Pomorski, J.L.Egido, L.M.Robledo The fission of 252Cf from a mean field perspective NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 252Cf; calculated potential energy surface, shape evolution during fission. Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approach, Gogny force.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301305003193
2005WA30 J.Phys.(London) G31, S1555 (2005) M.Warda, K.Pomorski, J.L.Egido, L.M.Robledo Multimodal fission of 252Cf in the Gogny HFB model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 252Cf; calculated potential energy surfaces, scission configurations. Hartree-Fock-Bogolubov model, Gogny force.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/31/10/031
2004DI05 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E13, 1 (2004) K.Dietrich, M.Garny, K.Pomorski On charged insulated metallic clusters
doi: 10.1142/S0218301304001667
2004DO01 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E13, 309 (2004) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Mean-field description of heavy-ion collisions
doi: 10.1142/S0218301304002107
2004DU09 Eur.Phys.J. A 20, 15 (2004) J.Dudek, K.Pomorski, N.Schunck, N.Dubray Hyperdeformed and megadeformed nuclei: Lessons from the slow progress and emerging new strategies
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2002-10313-4
2004MA15 Nucl.Phys. A731, 319 (2004) A.Maj, M.Kmiecik, A.Bracco, F.Camera, P.Bednarczyk, B.Herskind, S.Brambilla, G.Benzoni, M.Brekiesz, D.Curien, G.De Angelis, E.Farnea, J.Grebosz, M.Kicinska-Habior, S.Leoni, W.Meczynski, B.Million, D.R.Napoli, J.Nyberg, C.M.Petrache, J.Styczen, O.Wieland, M.Zieblinski, K.Zuber, N.Dubray, J.Dudek, K.Pomorski Evidence for the Jacobi shape transition in hot 46Ti NUCLEAR REACTIONS 28Si(18O, X), E=105 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, γγ-, (particle)γ-coin. 46Ti deduced Jacobi shape transition. Euroball IV, Hector, and Euclides arrays, thermal shape fluctuation model.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.043
2004MA33 Eur.Phys.J. A 20, 165 (2004) A.Maj, M.Kmiecik, M.Brekiesz, J.Grebosz, W.Meczynski, J.Styczen, M.Zieblinski, K.Zuber, A.Bracco, F.Camera, G.Benzoni, B.Million, N.Blasi, S.Brambilla, S.Leoni, M.Pignanelli, O.Wieland, B.Herskind, P.Bednarczyk, D.Curien, J.P.Vivien, E.Farnea, G.De Angelis, D.R.Napoli, J.Nyberg, M.Kicinska-Habior, C.M.Petrache, J.Dudek, K.Pomorski Search for the Jacobi shape transition in light nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 28Si(18O, X), E=105 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, (particle)γ-coin. 46Ti deduced GDR features, Jacobi shape transition in excited nucleus.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2002-10345-8
2004NE14 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E13, 1147 (2004) B.Nerlo-Pomorska, K.Pomorski, J.Sykut, J.Bartel Temperature dependence of nuclear structure in the relativistic mean-field theory with a new parameter set NUCLEAR STRUCTURE A=16-220; calculated masses, binding energies, level density vs temperature. Relativistic mean-field theory.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301304002636
2004PO05 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E13, 107 (2004) Fission barriers within the liquid drop model with the surface-curvature term NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 75Br, 98Mo, 186Os, 210Po, 232Th, 240Pu, 252Cf; calculated fission barrier and binding energies, compression effect.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301304001801
2004PO18 Phys.Rev. C 70, 044306 (2004) Particle number conserving shell-correction method NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb; calculated proton and neutron shell-correction energies. Particle-number conserving approach.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.70.044306
2004SI18 Eur.Phys.J. A 20, 413 (2004) δ-pairing forces and collective pairing vibrations
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2003-10169-0
2004WA07 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E13, 169 (2004) M.Warda, K.Pomorski, J.L.Egido, L.M.Robledo Microscopic structure of the bimodal fission of 258Fm NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 258Fm; calculated single-particle level energies vs deformation, fission mechanism features.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301304001904
2003DO20 Nucl.Phys. A729, 713 (2003) A.Dobrowolski, K.Pomorski, J.Bartel Mean-field description of fusion barriers with Skyrme's interaction NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(50Ti, X), 232Th(48Ca, X), E not given; calculated fusion barrier distributions. Z=108-114; calculated fusion barrier heights for reactions leading to superheavy isotopes. Extended Thomas-Fermi method, Skyrme interaction.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.09.008
2003DO22 Acta Phys.Pol. B34, 2457 (2003) A.Dobrowolski, M.Kowal, K.Pomorski Fusion barriers derived from the Hartree-Fock functional with Skyrme interactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(50Ti, X), 208Pb(76Ge, X), E not given; calculated fusion barrier features. Other reactions leading to Z=114 discussed.
2003LO17 Acta Phys.Pol. B34, 1801 (2003) Z.Lojewski, A.Baran, K.Pomorski Spontaneous fission and α-decay half-lives of superheavy nuclei in different macroscopic energy models NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=100-106; calculated spontaneous fission and α-decay T1/2, Qα for even-even isotopes. Macroscopic model.
2003PO03 Phys.Rev. C 67, 044316 (2003) Nuclear liquid-drop model and surface-curvature effects NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 232Th, 240Pu, 160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180Yb, 240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270Fm; calculated liquid-drop fission barriers, surface-curvature dependent effects.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.67.044316
2003SC40 Acta Phys.Pol. B34, 2135 (2003) C.Schmitt, J.Bartel, A.Surowiec, K.Pomorski Fission of heavy nuclei at low energy NUCLEAR REACTIONS 209Bi(18O, F), E=76 MeV; measured fission fragment distribution, pre-scission neutron multiplicity; deduced shell and pairing effects. Two-dimensional Langevin equation.
2003SC41 Acta Phys.Pol. B34, 1651 (2003) C.Schmitt, J.Bartel, K.Pomorski, A.Surowiec Fission-fragment mass distribution and particle evaporation at low energies NUCLEAR REACTIONS 98Mo(28Si, X), E=187.2 MeV; calculated fusion and fission σ, fission barrier features. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 170Yb, 188Pt; calculated light particle emission widths from excited nuclei. 227Pa; calculated fission fragment mass distributions vs excitation energy.
Back to query form [Next] |