NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = M.Hemalatha Found 14 matches. 2022HE16 Phys.Rev. C 106, 054607 (2022) Nuclear charge radii of 46-62Cr isotopes and reaction cross sections for p-Cr NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 46,48,50,52,54,56,58,60,62Cr; calculated two-neutron separation energies, root-mean-square charge radii, proton and neutron density distributions. Relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov model with density-dependent meson-exchange relativistic energy functional DD-ME2 (DIRHB) and non-relativistic Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (HFB) model with the Gogny D1S interaction. Comparison to experimental data. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 46,48,50,52,54,56,58,60,62Cr(p, p), E=65 MeV; calculated central and spin-orbit parts of folded potential, σ(θ), total reaction σ using nuclear codes MOM and ECIS. Semimicroscopic folding optical model using Jeukenne-Lejeune-Mahaux-Bruyeres (JLMB) energy- and density-dependent NN interaction. Comparison with available experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.054607
2022SU19 Phys.Rev. C 106, 024316 (2022) S.Suman, S.K.Tandel, S.G.Wahid, T.Manu, M.Hemalatha, B.Maheshwari, A.K.Jain, P.Chowdhury, R.V.F.Janssens, F.G.Kondev, M.P.Carpenter, T.Lauritsen, D.Seweryniak Successive neutron alignments in the yrast, negative-parity band of oblate-deformed 199Tl NUCLEAR REACTIONS 197Au(209Bi, X)199Tl, E=1450 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, γγ-coin using Gammasphere array with 100 Compton-suppressed HPGe detectors at the ATLAS-ANL accelerator facility. 199Tl; deduced high-spin levels, J, π, alignments, signature slitting, B(M1)/B(E2), configurations, oblate deformation. 199Tl; calculated total energy surfaces in (ϵ cosγ, ϵ sinγ) plane, neutron- and proton-quasiparticle levels for oblate deformation as function of angular frequency with principal axis cranking (PAC) and tilted axis cranking (TAC) models using the ultimate cranker (UC) code.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024316
2021SU02 Phys.Rev. C 103, 014319 (2021) S.Suman, S.K.Tandel, A.Kumawat, S.G.Wahid, M.Hemalatha, P.Chowdhury, R.V.F.Janssens, M.P.Carpenter, T.L.Khoo, F.G.Kondev, T.Lauritsen, C.J.Lister, D.Seweryniak, S.Zhu Nanosecond isomers and the evolution of collectivity in stable, even-A Hg isotopes NUCLEAR REACTIONS 197Au(209Bi, X), E=1450 MeV; 197Au(207Pb, X), E=1430 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, three- and higher fold γγ-coin, γγ(θ)(DCO), half-lives of nanosecond isomers by γγ(t) using pulsed beams from ATLAS-ANL accelerator, and Gammasphere array of 100 Compton-suppressed HPGe detectors. 198,200,202Hg; deduced levels, J, π, multipolarities, B(E2), configurations, band crossings, and collectivity; calculated total energy surface plots, neutron and proton quasiparticle energy levels using the Ultimate Cranker code. Systematics of nanosecond isomers, half-lives and B(E2) in 192,194,196,198,200,202,204Hg.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.014319
2020HE02 Appl.Radiat.Isot. 156, 108968 (2020) M.Hemalatha, A.Patel, S.Kailas Excitation functions of the Zn(p, xn)Ga reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 64,66,67,68,70Zn(p, n), (p, 2n), E<30 MeV; calculated σ using the statistical model code TALYS-1.6. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108968
2020WA24 Phys.Rev. C 102, 024329 (2020) S.G.Wahid, S.K.Tandel, S.Suman, M.Hemalatha, A.Patel, P.Roy, A.Y.Deo, Pragati, P.C.Srivastava, B.Bhoy, S.S.Bhattacharjee, R.P.Singh, S.Muralithar, P.Chowdhury, R.V.F.Janssens, M.P.Carpenter, T.L.Khoo, F.G.Kondev, T.Lauritsen, C.J.Lister, D.Seweryniak, S.Zhu, S.Rai, A.Sharma Metastable states from multinucleon excitations in 202Tl and 203Pb NUCLEAR REACTIONS 198Pt(7Li, 3n)202Tl, E=31-36 MeV; 197Au(209Bi, X), E=1450 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, γγ-coin, γγ(θ)(DCO), γγ(linear polarization), half-lives of isomers by γ(t) and centroid-shift method using the INGA array at IUAC-New Delhi for the 202Tl experiment, and Gammasphere array at the ATLAS-ANL facility for 203Pb. 202Tl, 203Pb; deduced high-spin levels, isomers, J, π, multipolarities, B(E2), B(E3), configurations. Systematics of energies and B(Eλ) for isomers in 202,203,204Tl and 203,204,205Pb. Comparison with shell-model calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024329
2015HE23 Phys.Rev. C 92, 024611 (2015) M.Hemalatha, N.Maladkar, S.Kailas Correlation between nuclear charge radii of Ti and reaction cross sections for p-Ti NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 44,46,48,50,52,54,56Ti; calculated root-mean-square charge radii, proton and neutron density distributions using Relativistic Hartree Bogoliubov model with density-dependent meson-exchange relativistic energy functional using the interaction DD-ME2. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 44,46,48,50,52,54,56Ti(p, p), E=65 MeV; calculated σ(θ), total reaction σ. Semimicroscopic optical model. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.024611
2015KA39 Pramana 85, 517 (2015) S.Kailas, M.Hemalatha, A.Saxena Nuclear transmutation strategies for management of long-lived fission products
doi: 10.1007/s12043-015-1063-z
2014HE07 Pramana 82, 789 (2014) Double folding model analysis of elastic scattering of halo nucleus 11Be from 64Zn NUCLEAR REACTIONS 64Zn(9Be, 9Be), (10Be, 10Be), (11Be, 11Be), E=24.5 MeV; calculated σ, potential and normalization parameters. Complex energy-dependent M3Y interaction, comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1007/s12043-014-0729-2
2013TA12 Phys.Rev. C 87, 034319 (2013) S.K.Tandel, M.Hemalatha, A.Y.Deo, S.B.Patel, R.Palit, T.Trivedi, J.Sethi, S.Saha, D.C.Biswas, S.Mukhopadhyay Evolution of octupole collectivity in 221Th NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(16O, 3n), E=86 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, γγ-coin, γγ(θ)(DCO) using INGA array at TIFR facility. 221Th; deduced high-spin levels, J, π, bands, multipolarity, moment of inertia plots, reflection-asymmetric octupole structures, intrinsic electric dipole moment. Systematics of energy splittings between positive and negative-parity states in odd-A (A=219-225) Th nuclei. Comparison with Woods-Saxon cranking calculations including octupole deformation.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.034319
2009HE09 Phys.Rev. C 79, 057602 (2009) M.Hemalatha, Y.K.Gambhir, W.Haider, S.Kailas Predicted weakening of the spin-orbit interaction with the addition of neutrons NUCLEAR REACTIONS 76,78,80,82,84,86,88,90,92,94,96,98,100,102,104,106,108,110Zr(polarized p, p), E=39.6, 50 MeV; 96,98,100,102,104,106,108,110,112,114,116,118,120,122,124,126,128,130,132,134,136Sn(polarized p, p), E=22.5, 50 MeV; calculated volume integral per nucleon, σ, analyzing powers using microscopic proton-nucleus optical potential in the framework of first-order Brueckner theory with Urbana V14 soft core interaction. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.057602
2007HE06 Phys.Rev. C 75, 037602 (2007) M.Hemalatha, Y.K.Gambhir, S.Kailas, W.Haider Microscopic optical model potentials for p-nucleus scattering at intermediate energies NUCLEAR REACTIONS 40Ca(polarized p, p), E=35, 200 MeV; calculated σ(θ), Ay(θ). Microscopic optical model potentials compared with data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.75.037602
2005HE28 Hyperfine Interactions 162, 133 (2005) M.Hemalatha, S.Kailas, Y.K.Gambhir Study of Exotic Nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141Cs; calculated binding energies, radii, skin thickness.
doi: 10.1007/s10751-005-9214-0
2004HE22 Nucl.Instrum.Methods Phys.Res. A531, 645 (2004) M.Hemalatha, S.Kailas, K.Mahata, A.Shrivastava, K.Ramachandran, A.Chatterjee Production of neutron-deficient nuclei 127Cs and 129Cs by heavy-ion fusion reaction NUCLEAR REACTIONS Sn(11B, xn)127Cs/129Cs, E=34.8-51.1 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, production σ.
doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2004.05.120
2004HE24 Phys.Rev. C 70, 044320 (2004) M.Hemalatha, A.Bhagwat, A.Shrivastava, S.Kailas, Y.K.Gambhir Anomaly in the nuclear charge radii of Zr isotopes NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 78,80,82,84,86,88,90,92,94,96,98,100,102,104,106Zr; calculated ground-state deformation, radii, two-neutron separation energies, density distributions. Relativistic mean-field approach. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 88,90,92,94,96,98,100,102Zr(p, p), E=50 MeV; calculated σ(θ). 78,80,82,84,86,88,90,92,94,96,98,100,102,104,106Zr(p, X), E=50 MeV; calculated reaction σ. Relativistic mean-field approach, comparison with data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.70.044320
Back to query form |