NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = L.Platter Found 33 matches. 2023AC12 J.Phys.(London) G50, 095102 (2023) B.Acharya, L.E.Marcucci, L.Platter Revisiting proton-proton fusion in chiral effective field theory NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(p, X), E not given; calculated proton-proton fusion S-factor and uncertainties by performing order-by-order computations with a variety of chiral interactions that are regularized and calibrated in different ways.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ace3e2
2023BO08 Phys.Rev. C 107, 065502 (2023) J.Bonilla, B.Acharya, L.Platter Muon capture on the deuteron in chiral effective field theory NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(μ, X), E at <300 MeV/c; calculated total muon capture rate, capture rate from the doublet and quartet channel. Quantified the theoretical uncertainties. Chiral effective field theory at next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) currents. Studied the dependence on the cutoff used to regularize the interactions, low energy constants calibrated using different fitting data and strategies, and truncation of the effective-field-theory expansion of the currents. Comparison to available experimental data and other theoretical estimations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.065502
2023EL03 Phys.Rev. C 108, 015501 (2023) W.Elkamhawy, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Weak decay of halo nuclei RADIOACTIVITY 11Be(β-p); calculated differential decay rate for β-delayed proton emission as a function of the final-state particle energy, partial decay rate as a function of the resonance energy, branching ratios, logft. Cluster effective field theory for halo nuclei considering direct decay into the continuum and resonant final state interactions between the proton and the core. Comparison to previous theoretical estimations and available experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.015501
2022MI13 Phys.Rev. C 106, 024004 (2022) C.Mishra, A.Ekstrom, G.Hagen, T.Papenbrock, L.Platter Two-pion exchange as a leading-order contribution in chiral effective field theory
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024004
2021EL08 Phys.Lett. B 821, 136610 (2021) W.Elkamhawy, Z.Yang, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter β-delayed proton emission from 11Be in effective field theory RADIOACTIVITY 11Be(β-p); calculated decay rate, branching ratios using Halo effective field theory. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136610
2021EM01 J.Phys.(London) G48, 035101 (2021) Pionless effective field theory evaluation of nuclear polarizability in muonic deuterium
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/abcb58
2021YA22 Phys.Rev. C 104, 024002 (2021) Z.Yang, E.Mereghetti, L.Platter, M.R.Schindler, J.Vanasse Electric dipole moments of three-nucleon systems in the pionless effective field theory NUCLEAR MOMENTS 3H, 3He; calculated electric dipole moments (EDMs) electric dipole form factor, momentum dependence of the electric dipole form factor in the Wigner limit using leading order (LO) pionless chiral effective field theory (EFT).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024002
2019AC09 Phys.Rev. C 100, 021001R (2019) Universal behavior of p-wave proton-proton fusion near threshold NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(p, X), E<110 keV; calculated p-wave contribution to the proton-proton fusion S factor and total threshold S factor using chiral effective-field theory (EFT) up to the next-to-leading order.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.021001
2019DE28 Phys.Rev. C 100, 055502 (2019) Tritium β decay in pionless effective field theory RADIOACTIVITY 3H(β-); calculated β- decay Fermi and Gamow-Teller matrix elements, three-nucleon scattering amplitudes, Gamow-Teller strength using the pionless effective field theory at next-to-leading order (NLO); deduced a low-energy parameter using the measured half-life of tritium decay. Relevance to high-accuracy prediction of the solar proton-proton fusion rate.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.055502
2019OD02 Phys.Rev. C 100, 054001 (2019) D.Odell, A.Deltuva, J.Bonilla, L.Platter Renormalization of a finite-range inverse-cube potential
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054001
2019SC09 Phys.Rev. C 99, 054611 (2019) M.Schmidt, L.Platter, H.-W.Hammer Neutron transfer reactions in halo effective field theory NUCLEAR REACTIONS 10Be(d, p), E=12, 15, 18, 21.4 MeV; calculated differential σ(θ, E) using halo effective field theory (EFT) at leading-order (LO) and next-to-leading-order (NLO). Comparison with experimental data, and with other theoretical calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.054611
2018AC07 Phys.Rev. C 98, 065506 (2018) B.Acharya, A.Ekstrom, L.Platter Effective-field-theory predictions of the muon-deuteron capture rate NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(μ-, X), E=125-300 MeV; calculated distribution of central values and uncertainties for muon-capture rate, and capture rate as a function of proton-proton Spp factor using chiral effective-field-theory, and using the experimental value of triton β-decay half-life. Relevance to forthcoming experimental results from the MuSun Collaboration.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.065506
2018BR18 Eur.Phys.J. A 54, 196 (2018) J.Braun, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Halo structure of 17C NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 17C; calculated halo nucleus predictions of charge radius, magnetic moment of (1/2)+ state, γ-ray transition strengths, 16C(n, γ) E1 capture σ to (1/2)+ at E(cm) below 30 MeV using EFT (Effective Field Theory); discussed Halo EFT predictive power for (3/2)+ and (5/2)+ states (neutron in D-wave).
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2018-12630-3
2017AC01 Phys.Rev. C 95, 031301 (2017) B.Acharya, A.Ekstrom, D.Odell, T.Papenbrock, L.Platter Corrections to nucleon capture cross sections computed in truncated Hilbert spaces NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(n, γ), E(cm)=1 MeV; 1H(p, X), E(cm)=50, 1000 keV; calculated dependence of the nucleon capture cross section on the radius of the hard wall with Dirichlet boundary condition using computations based on hyperspherical harmonics. Relevance to rp-process.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.031301
2017PL02 Few-Body Systems 58, 105 (2017) Effective Field Theory for Halo Nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 17F, 8B; analyzed available data; deduced S-factors.
doi: 10.1007/s00601-017-1263-9
2016OD01 Phys.Rev. C 93, 044331 (2016) D.Odell, T.Papenbrock, L.Platter Infrared extrapolations of quadrupole moments and transitions
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044331
2016RY01 Ann.Phys.(New York) 367, 13 (2016) E.Ryberg, C.Forssen, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Range corrections in proton halo nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 16O(p, X)17F, E<2.3 MeV; calculated S-factor, charge radii. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2016.01.008
2014RY03 Phys.Rev. C 89, 014325 (2014) E.Ryberg, C.Forssen, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Effective field theory for proton halo nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 16O(p, γ)17F*, E(cm)=0-2000 keV; calculated charge form factor, radiative proton capture cross section, charge radius, astrophysical S factor for excited 1/2+ state in 17F using leading order halo effective field theory (LO halo EFT); comparison with experimental data and other theoretical calculation.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.014325
2014RY06 Eur.Phys.J. A 50, 170 (2014) E.Ryberg, C.Forssen, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Constraining low-energy proton capture on beryllium-7 through charge radius measurements NUCLEAR REACTIONS 7Be(p, γ), E(cm)=0-500 keV. 8B calculated charge radius, reaction S-factor using leading-order effective field theory. Compared with reaction data. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 8B; calculated S-factor vs charge radius; deduced threshold S-factor using charge radius data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2014-14170-2
2013HA32 Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 132501 (2013) G.Hagen, P.Hagen, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Efimov Physics Around the Neutron-Rich 60Ca Isotope NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 60,61,62Ca; calculated neutron S-wave scattering phase shifts; deduced correlations between different three-body observables and the two-neutron separation energy. Modern ab initio interactions derived from chiral effective theory.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.132501
2013HA33 Eur.Phys.J. A 49, 118 (2013) P.Hagen, H.-W.Hammer, L.Platter Charge form factors of two-neutron halo nuclei in halo EFT NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 9,10,11Li, 12,13,14Be, 20,21,22C; calculated charge formfactors, charge radii including halo nuclei using EFT (effective field theory); deduced parameters. Compared with available measurement.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2013-13118-4
2011AK02 Eur.Phys.J. A 47, 122 (2011) O.Akerlund, E.J.Lindgren, J.Bergsten, B.Grevholm, P.Lerner, R.Linscott, C.Forssen, L.Platter The similarity renormalization group for three-body interactions in one dimension
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2011-11122-4
2011BE12 Phys.Rev. C 83, 045803 (2011) Quark mass variation constraints from Big Bang nucleosynthesis
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.045803
2011DR03 Phys.Rev. C 84, 014318 (2011) Exact-exchange density functional theory for neutron drops
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.014318
2009BO05 Eur.Phys.J. A 39, 219 (2009) S.K.Bogner, R.J.Furnstahl, L.Platter Density matrix expansion for low-momentum interactions
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2008-10695-1
2007HA41 Eur.Phys.J. A 32, 113 (2007) Universal properties of the four-body system with large scattering length
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2006-10301-8
2007HA42 Eur.Phys.J. A 32, 335 (2007) H.-W.Hammer, D.R.Phillips, L.Platter Pion-mass dependence of three-nucleon observables NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H; calculated ground and excited state binding energies using effective field theory.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2007-10380-y
2007PL05 Nucl.Phys. A790, 394c (2007) Effective range corrections in few-body systems with large scattering length NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(n, n), E=low; calculated S-wave phase shifts, 3H binding energy. Three-body forces discussed. Effective field theory with contact interactions. Comparison with data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa2007.03.142
2006PL02 Nucl.Phys. A766, 132 (2006) Universality in the triton charge form factor NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H; calculated charge form factor, charge radius, correlations. Comparison with data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.11.023
2006PL09 Phys.Rev. C 74, 037001 (2006) Three-nucleon system at next-to-next-to-leading order NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H; calculated S-wave phase shifts, three-nucleon bound state spectrum, scattering lengths. range corrections, correlations. Three-body forces discussed. Effective field theory calculations, comparison with data. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(n, n), E=low; calculated S-wave phase shifts, three-nucleon bound state spectrum, range corrections, scattering lengths, correlations. Three-body forces discussed. Effective field theory calculations, comparison with data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.037001
2006PL10 Phys.Lett. B 641, 164 (2006) Deuteron matrix elements in chiral effective theory at leading order
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2006.08.053
2005PL01 Phys.Lett. B 607, 254 (2005) L.Platter, H.-W.Hammer, Ulf.-G.Meissner On the correlation between the binding energies of the triton and the α-particle NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H, 4He; calculated binding energies, correlations.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.068
2003PL01 Nucl.Phys. A714, 250 (2003) L.Platter, H.-W.Hammer, U.-G.Meissner Quasiparticle properties in effective field theory
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01365-9
Back to query form |