NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = A.V.Andreev Found 42 matches. 2024MU02 J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 333, 1559 (2024) R.S.Mukhin, A.V.Isaev, A.V.Andreev, M.L.Chelnokov, V.I.Chepigin, H.M.Devaraja, B.Gall, K.Hauschild, I.N.Izosimov, A.A.Kuznetsova, A.Lopez-Martens, O.N.Malyshev, A.G.Popeko, Yu.A.Popov, A.Rahmatinejad, B.Sailaubekov, T.M.Shneidman, E.A.Sokol, A.I.Svirikhin, M.S.Tezekbayeva, A.V.Yeremin Analysis of the shape of multiplicity distributions of prompt neutrons emitted in spontaneous fission RADIOACTIVITY 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262Rf, 252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262Lr, 249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261No, 245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259Md, 243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259Fm(SF); analyzed available data; deduced the prompt neutron multiplicity distribution (PNMD) emitted is the spontaneous fission (SF), shape of the PNMD helps to achieve the information according the dynamic of the SF.
doi: 10.1007/s10967-023-09164-0
2023IS03 Phys.Lett. B 843, 138008 (2023) A.V.Isaev, R.S.Mukhin, A.V.Andreev, Z.Asfari, M.L.Chelnokov, V.I.Chepigin, H.M.Devaraja, O.Dorvaux, B.Gall, K.Hauschild, I.N.Izosimov, A.A.Kuznetsova, A.Lopez-Martens, O.N.Malyshev, A.G.Popeko, Yu.A.Popov, A.Rahmatinejad, B.Sailaubekov, T.M.Shneidman, E.A.Sokol, A.I.Svirikhin, M.S.Tezekbayeva, A.V.Yeremin, N.I.Zamyatin Structure of the prompt neutron multiplicity distribution in the spontaneous fission of 256Rf RADIOACTIVITY 256Rf(SF), (α) [from 208Pb(50Ti, X), E=237 MeV];measured fission products, En, In, TOF; deduced neutron multiplicity distribution, alpha decay branching ratio and T1/2. Prompt neutron multiplicity study in the superheavy element region. SHELS separator, U-400 cyclotron, the Flerov laboratory at JINR.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138008
2023PA05 Phys.Rev. C 107, 024603 (2023) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Excitation-energy dependence of the fission-fragment neutron-excess ratio RADIOACTIVITY 250Cf(SF); calculated charge and total kinetic energy distributions resulting from fission of 250Cf excited to 46 MeV energy, average number of neutron per one fission fragment. 250Cf, 240Pu(SF); calculated neutron-excess ratio in fragments. Calculation in the framework of scission-point model, where the scission configurations are dinuclear systems with two touching individual nuclei (fragments). Comparison to experimental data on fission of 240Pu [from 12C(238U, 10Be), E*=9 MeV] and 250Cf [from 12C(238U, X), E*=46 MeV]. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 239Pu(n, F), E=0.5 MeV; calculated primary mass distribution, average number of neutrons emitted by one of the fragments. 12C(238U, X)238U*, E*=7.4 MeV; 12C(238U, X)240Pu*, E*=10.7 MeV; 12C(238U, X)244Cm*, E*=23 MeV; 12C(238U, X)250Cf*, E*=46 MeV; calculated neutron-excess ratio in fission fragments, fission fragments charge distribution. Comparison to experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.024603
2023PA21 Phys.Rev. C 108, 014613 (2023) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Influence of the transition from symmetric to asymmetric fission mode on the average total kinetic energy and neutron multiplicity NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E=thermal;239Pu(n, F), E=0.5 MeV;222,224,226,228,230Th(γ, F), E*=11 MeV; calculated average numbers of neutrons emitted per fission event, neutron multiplicities, charge and mass distributions of fission fragments, average total kinetic energies. Comparison to experimental data. RADIOACTIVITY 230Th, 236U, 244,252Cf, 240Pu(SF); calculated average numbers of neutrons emitted per fission event, neutron multiplicities, charge and mass distributions of fission fragments, average total kinetic energies. Comparison to experimental data. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 236U; calculated potential energy surface for the binary fragmentation.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.014613
2023PA43 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E32, 2340005 (2023) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Fission within dinuclear system approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 180,182Hg, 190Hg, 198Hg, 250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258Fm, 250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258No, Pb, Rn, Th, U, Cf; calculated fission properties with the improved scission-point statistical model based on the dinuclear system approach.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301323400050
2022IS05 Eur.Phys.J. A 58, 108 (2022) A.V.Isaev, R.S.Mukhin, A.V.Andreev, M.A.Bychkov, M.L.Chelnokov, V.I.Chepigin, H.M.Devaraja, O.Dorvaux, M.Forge, B.Gall, K.Hauschild, I.N.Izosimov, K.Kessaci, A.A.Kuznetsova, A.Lopez-Martens, O.N.Malyshev, A.G.Popeko, Yu.A.Popov, A.Rahmatinejad, B.Sailaubekov, T.M.Shneidman, E.A.Sokol, A.I.Svirikhin, D.A.Testov, M.S.Tezekbayeva, A.V.Yeremin, N.I.Zamyatin, K.Sh.Zhumadilov Prompt neutron emission in the spontaneous fission of 246Fm RADIOACTIVITY 246Fm(SF) [from 208Pb(40Ar, X), E=183 MeV]; measured decay products, En, In; deduced neutron yields, nubar, spontaneous fission branching ratio, T1/2. Tikhonov method of statistical regularisation. FLNR JINR using the SHELS separator and the SFiNx detection system, the U-400 cyclotron.
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00761-3
2022JH01 Phys.Rev. C 106, 044607 (2022) A.Jhingan, C.Schmitt, A.Lemasson, S.Biswas, Y.H.Kim, D.Ramos, A.N.Andreyev, D.Curien, M.Ciemala, E.Clement, O.Dorvaux, B.De Canditiis, F.Didierjean, G.Duchene, J.Dudouet, J.Frankland, G.Fremont, J.Goupil, B.Jacquot, C.Raison, D.Ralet, B.-M.Retailleau, L.Stuttge, I.Tsekhanovich, A.V.Andreev, S.Goriely, S.Hilaire, J.-F.Lemaitre, P.Moller, K.-H.Schmidt 178Hg and asymmetric fission of neutron-deficient pre-actinides NUCLEAR REACTIONS 54Fe(124Xe, X)178Hg; E=4.3 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products, fission fragments, (fragment)(fragment)-coin; deduced total kinetic energy distribution, post-neutron (after neutron emission) and pre-neutron (before emission) mass distribution. Comparison to other experimental data in particular with 180Hg and 178Pt fission. Obtained pre-neutron mass-distribution is compared with four different calculations: the dynamical Brownians%hape motion (BSM) model, the microscopic scission point model (SPY2), the improved macromicroscopic scission point model (SPM), and the semiempirical GEneral Fission (GEF) model. VAMOS++ heavy-ion magnetic spectrometer with new SEcond Detection (SED) arm for coincident pair fragment detection at GANIL.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.044607
2021IS09 Phys.Part. and Nucl.Lett. 18, 449 (2021) A.V.Isaev, A.V.Andreev, M.L.Chelnokov, V.I.Chepigin, I.N.Izosimov, A.A.Kuznetsova, O.N.Malyshev, R.S.Mukhin, A.G.Popeko, Y.A.Popov, T.M.Shneidman, E.A.Sokol, A.I.Svirikhin, M.S.Tezekbayeva, A.V.Yeremin, N.I.Zamyatin, P.Brionnet, O.Dorvaux, B.Gall, K.Kessaci, A.Sellam, K.Hauschild, A.Lopez-Martens, S.Antalic, P.Mosat Comparative Study of Spontaneous-Fission Characteristics of 252No and 254No Isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 252,254No(SF) [from 206,208Pb(48Ca, X), E=215 MeV]; measured decay products; deduced T1/2, total kinetic energies of fission fragments, and prompt-neutron multiplicities (nubars). SHELS separator, Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions (JINR).
doi: 10.1134/S1547477121040087
2021PA27 Phys.Rev. C 104, 014604 (2021) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Simultaneous description of charge, mass, total kinetic energy, and neutron multiplicity distributions in fission of Th and U isotopes NUCLEAR REACTIONS 222,226,230Th, 230,234U(γ, F), E*=11 MeV; calculated charge, mass, total kinetic energy (TKE), and neutron multiplicity distributions of fission fragments, and correlations between these parameters using the improved scission-point model in the general framework of dinuclear system (DNS) model; deduced influence of transition from symmetric to asymmetric fission mode. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.014604
2020PA22 Phys.Rev. C 101, 064604 (2020) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Examination of coexistence of symmetric mass and asymmetric charge distributions of fission fragments NUCLEAR REACTIONS 144Sm(36Ar, F)180Hg*, E*=33.4, 48, 65.8 MeV; 142Nd(40Ca, F)182Hg*, E*=33, 58, 75 MeV; 154Sm(36Ar, F)190Hg*, E*=56, 62.4, 70.5 MeV; 194Pt(α, F)198Hg*, E*=49 MeV; 154Sm(48Ca, F)202Pb*, E*=49, 57, 95 MeV; calculated mass and charge distributions, potential energies and deformations of fission fragments from fission of compound nuclei in excited states using the improved scission-point model. Comparison with available experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.064604
2019AN02 Phys.Rev. A 99, 013422 (2019) A.V.Andreev, A.B.Savel'ev, S.Yu.Stremoukhov, O.A.Shoutova Nuclear isomer excitation in 229Th atoms by superintense laser fields ATOMIC PHYSICS 229Th; analyzed available data; deduced that the rate of isomeric state excitation can be enhanced significantly with respect to other nucleus excitation processes in laser plasma or by an external coherent source at the resonance wavelength.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.013422
2019PA36 Phys.Rev. C 99, 064611 (2019) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Change of the shape of mass and charge distributions in fission of Cf isotopes with excitation energy RADIOACTIVITY 250,252,254,256Cf(SF); calculated fission fragment mass and charge distributions using the improved scission-point model. Comparison with experimental data. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 249Cf(n, F), E=thermal; 248,250,252,254,256Cf; induced fission at excitation energies of 0, 15, 25, 35, 45, 46, 55, 65 MeV; calculated fission fragment mass and charge distributions, scission configurations, average light fragment mass and charge, and peak to valley ratio of fission fragment mass and charge distributions. Statistical scission-point fission model.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064611
2019SV01 Phys.Part. and Nucl.Lett. 16, 768 (2019) A.I.Svirikhin, A.V.Andreev, A.V.Yeremin, N.I.Zamyatin, I.N.Izosimov, A.V.Isaev, A.N.Kuznetsov, A.A.Kuznetsova, O.N.Malyshev, A.G.Popeko, Y.A.Popov, E.A.Sokol, M.S.Tezekbayeva, M.L.Chelnokov, V.I.Chepigin, T.M.Schneidman, B.Andel, S.Antalic, A.Bronis, P.Mosat, B.Gall, O.Dorvaux, B.M.Retailleau, K.Hauschild, A.Lopez-Martenz, P.Chauveau, E.Stefanova, D.Tonev Prompt Neutrons from Spontaneous 254Rf Fission
doi: 10.1134/S1547477119060311
2018AN08 Bull.Rus.Acad.Sci.Phys. 82, 736 (2018) A.V.Andreev, A.A.Afonin, Yu.M.Burmistrov, S.V.Zuyev, E.S.Konobeevski, M.V.Mordovskoy, E.V.Pletnikov Composition of Radioactive and Nonradioactive Elements in Samples of Atmospheric Aerosols and Near-Earth Surface Precipitation
doi: 10.3103/S1062873818060047
2018PA01 Nucl.Phys. A969, 226 (2018) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Transitions between symmetric and asymmetric modes in the region of heavy actinides RADIOACTIVITY 242,244,246,248,250,250,252,254,256Cf, 250,252,254,256Fm, 250,252,254No(SF); calculated fragment mass distributions, fragment charge distribution. Compared with available data. Scission point fission model.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.10.001
2018PA14 Phys.Rev. C 97, 034621 (2018) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Charge distributions of fission fragments of low- and high-energy fission of Fm, No, and Rf isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 254,256,258,260,264Fm, 258,260,262,264No, 262,264,266Rf(SF); calculated mass and charge distribution of fission fragments using statistical scission-point fission model. Comparison with available experimental data. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 254,256,258,260,264Fm(n, F), E=thermal; calculated mass and charge distribution of fission fragments. 254,256,258,260,264Fm; induced fission at excitation energies of 15, 25, 35, 50 MeV; 258,260,262,264No; induced fission at excitation energies of 25, 50 MeV; 262,264,266Rf; induced fission at excitation energies of 20, 50 MeV; calculated mass and charge distribution of fission fragments. Statistical scission-point fission model. Comparison with available experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034621
2018PA25 Phys.Rev. C 98, 014624 (2018) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko, D.Lacroix Toward an understanding of the anomaly in charge yield of Mo and Sn fragments in the fission reaction 238U (n, f) NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(n, F), E=1.5, 1.97, 2.7 MeV; calculated yields of fission fragments with Z=30-62 using improved scission-point model. Comparison with experimental data, and with GEF theoretical predictions. Discussed possible explanation for anomaly in charge yields of Mo and Sn fragments.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.014624
2018PA32 Eur.Phys.J. A 54, 104 (2018) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Suggestion for examination of a role of multi-chance fission NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(n, F), E=32.8, 45.3, 59.9 MeV; calculated fragment mass distribution without employing multi-chance fission assumption. Compared to data. RADIOACTIVITY 218,220,222,224,226,228Th, 240U, 244Pu(SF); calculated (excited nuclei, E*=15-60 MeV) fission fragments charge, mass distribution without employing multi-chance fission assumption. Compared to data. 240U(SF); calculated (excited nucleus, E*=55 MeV) fission fragments charge, mass distribution considering multi-chance fission assumption. Compared to data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2018-12545-y
2018PA35 Nucl.Phys. A977, 1 (2018) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Induced fission modes of Fermium and Nobelium isotopes NUCLEAR REACTIONS 254,256,258,260Fm(n, f), E=thermal, E*=15 MeV;254,256,258,260Fm260(SF);262,264No(n, f), E=thermal, E*=25, 50 MeV;262,264No(SF); calculated mass distribution using spontaneous and thermal-neutron-induce fission model. Compared with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.05.008
2018SV02 Bull.Rus.Acad.Sci.Phys. 82, 632 (2018) A.I.Svirikhin, A.V.Yeremin, A.V.Andreev, I.N.Izosimov, A.V.Isaev, A.N.Kuznetsov, A.A.Kuznetsova, O.N.Malyshev, A.G.Popeko, Y.A.Popov, E.A.Sokol, M.L.Chelnokov, V.I.Chepigin, T.M.Schneidman, B.Gall, O.Dorvaux, P.Brione, K.Hauschild, A.Lopez-Martenz, K.Rezynkina, S.Mullins, P.Jones, P.Mosat, B.Andel, Z.Kalaninova, M.Z.Asfari, N.Yoshihiro, J.Piot, E.Stefanova, D.Tonev Short-Lived Isotopes of Transfermium Elements: Studying Characteristics of Spontaneous Fissioning RADIOACTIVITY 256Rf, 250,252No(SF)[reaction created]; calculated formation of isotopes vs energy; compared with data (short- and long-lived isomers separately). COMPILATION 236,238,240,242,244Pu, 242,244,246,248,250Cm, 249Bk, 246,250,252,254Cf, 244,246,256,258Fm, 250,252No, 256Rf, 258,260Md, 268Db(SF); 250,250m,252No; compiled average number of emitted neutrons accompanying spontaneous fission vs TKE; calculated spontaneous fission fragments TKE; compared with data.
doi: 10.3103/S1062873818060308
2017PA05 Acta Phys.Pol. B48, 431 (2017) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Physical Origin of the Transition from Symmetric to Asymmetric Fission Fragment Charge Distribution NUCLEAR REACTIONS 204,206,208Rn, 210,212,214,216,218Ra, 218,220,222,224,226,228Th, 230,232,234U(γ, f), E*≈11 MeV; calculated fission charge yields using improved scission-point model. Compared with available data.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.48.431
2017SV02 Phys.Part. and Nucl.Lett. 14, 571 (2017) A.I.Svirikhin, A.V.Andreev, A.V.Yeremin, I.N.Izosimov, A.V.Isaev, A.N.Kuznetsov, A.A.Kuznetsova, O.N.Malyshev, A.G.Popeko, Y.A.Popov, E.A.Sokol, M.L.Chelnokov, V.I.Chepigin, T.M.Schneidman, B.Gall, O.Dorvaux, P.Brione, K.Hauschild, A.Lopez-Martens, K.Rezynkina, S.Mullins, P.Jones, P.Mosat Characteristics of spontaneous fission of 250No NUCLEAR REACTIONS 204Pb(48Ca, xn), E=410-470 MeV; measured neutrons, fission fragments kinetic energy, TKEL, short-lived fragments; deduced σ vs E. 250No(SF), SF T1/2, average neutron multiplicity separately for each T1/2. 236,238,240,242,244Pu, 242,244,246,248,250Cm, 249Bk, 246,250,252,254Cf, 244,246,254,256,258Fm, 250,250m,252No, 256Rf, 258,260Md, 268Db; deduced, compiled systematics of average neutron multiplicity from SF (Spontaneous Fission) vs nucleus.
doi: 10.1134/S1547477117040161
2016AN05 Phys.Rev. C 93, 034620 (2016) A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Asymmetry of fission fragment mass distribution for Po and Ir isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 194,196At(β+F), (ECF); calculated mass distributions of fission fragments for β-delayed fission of 194,196Po nuclei; deduced symmetric and asymmetric fission modes. Improved scission-point model. Comparison with experimental data. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 185,187,189,191,193Ir; calculated mass distributions for the fission at excitation energy of 10 MeV at the saddle point. Improved scission-point model. Comparison with experimental data for 187,189Ir.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.034620
2016PA21 Phys.Rev. C 93, 054602 (2016) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko, Y.Kim Energy dependence of mass, charge, isotopic, and energy distributions in neutron-induced fission of 235U and 239Pu NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U, 239Pu(n, F), E=thermal, 10-55 MeV; calculated mass, charge, isotopic, and kinetic-energy distributions of fission fragments. 214,218Ra, 230,232,238U(γ, F); calculated charge distributions. 238U(n, F), E=32.8, 45.3, 59.9 MeV; calculated mass distributions. Improved scission-point statistical model with dinuclear system (DNS) model for the fission observables. Comparison with available experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054602
2016PA46 Phys.Rev. C 94, 064614 (2016) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Unexpected asymmetry of the charge distribution in the fission of 222, 224Th at high excitation energies NUCLEAR REACTIONS 218,220,222,224,226,228Th(E, F), E(*)=11 MeV; calculated charge distributions, driving potentials averaged over fragment mass number and deformations, components of the driving potentials, deformations of fragments. 222,224,226,228Th(E, F), E(*)=11, 35, 60 MeV; calculated charge distributions at different excitation energies of the initial compound nucleus, energy surfaces for 76,78,80,82,84,86,88,90,92,94Kr fragmentations. Improved scission-point model. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.064614
2016PA47 Eur.Phys.J. A 52, 369 (2016) H.Pasca, A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Extraction of potential energy in charge asymmetry coordinate from experimental fission data RADIOACTIVITY 212,214,216,218Ra, 218,220,222,224,226,228Th, 230,232,234U(SF); calculated fission fragment deformation vs charge using fit to the observed yields. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 222,224,226,228Th(γ, F), E not given; calculated potential energy surfaces, yields using observed charge distribution.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16369-5
2013AN19 Phys.Rev. C 88, 047604 (2013) A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko, A.N.Andreyev Isospin dependence of mass-distribution shape of fission fragments of Hg isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 180Tl(SF); calculated mass distributions in fission of 180Hg using improved scission-point model. Comparison with experimental data. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 144Sm(36Ar, F)180Hg*, E(cm)=128, 136, 152, 200 MeV; 144Sm(40Ar, F)184Hg*, E(cm)=125.2, 133, 148.7, 172.2, 195.6 MeV; 174,176,178,182,186,188,190,192,194,196Hg; calculated mass distributions in induced fission using improved scission-point model.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.047604
2012AN11 Phys.Rev. C 86, 044315 (2012) A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko Mass distributions for induced fission of different Hg isotopes NUCLEAR REACTIONS 194Pt(α, F)198Hg*, E=50.4 MeV; 197Au(p, F)198Hg*, E=22.4 MeV; 144Sm(36Ar, F)180Hg*, 144Sm(40Ar, F)184Hg*, 148Sm(40Ar, F)188Hg*, 160Gd(32S, F)192Hg*, 160Gd(36S, F)196Hg*, E=10-30 MeV; calculated mass distribution, and mean total kinetic energy of fission fragments using the scission-point model. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.044315
2012SH41 J.Phys.:Conf.Ser. 366, 012046 (2012) T.M.Shneidman, A.V.Andreev, M.Sin, C.Massimi, G.Vannini, A.Ventura Advanced fission models in nuclear data calculations NUCLEAR REACTIONS 233U(n, F), E=0.5-20 MeV; calculated σ, fragments angular anisotropy using EMPIRE. Compared to data.
doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/366/1/012046
2012SV02 Eur.Phys.J. A 48, 121 (2012) A.I.Svirikhin, A.V.Andreev, V.N.Dushin, M.L.Chelnokov, V.I.Chepigin, M.Gupta, A.V.Isaev, I.N.Izosimov, D.E.Katrasev, A.N.Kuznetsov, O.N.Malyshev, S.Mullins, A.G.Popeko, E.A.Sokol, A.V.Yeremin The emission of prompt neutrons from the spontaneous fission of 252No and 244Fm RADIOACTIVITY 244Fm(SF)[from 206Pb(40Ar, 2n), E≈186 MeV];252No(SF)[from 206Pb(48Ca, 2n), E≈216 MeV]; measured spontaneous fission prompt En, In using 3He-filled counters, ER, fission fragments, Eα, Iα; calculated average TKE, average neutron multiplicity; deduced neutron multiplicity distribution, average neutron multiplicity. 244Fm deduced pre-neutron TKE.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2012-12121-7
2008AD18 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E17, 2014 (2008) G.G.Adamian, A.V.Andreev, N.V.Antonenko, W.Scheid Binary and ternary fission within the statistical model NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F)104Mo/132Sn/104Zr/132Te, E not given; calculated potential energy of scission configurations, fission products;32S(24Mg, X)56Ni, E not given; calculated charge distributions in induced ternary fission. RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf(SF); 102Zr, 150Ce, 106Mo, 146Ba, 112Ru, 140Xe, 118Pd, 134Te; calculated spontaneous fission, cluster decay products kinetic energies, variances, mass yields.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301308011008
2007AN28 Phys.Atomic Nuclei 70, 1649 (2007) A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko, S.P.Ivanova, S.N.Kuklin, W.Scheid Cluster aspects of binary and ternary fission RADIOACTIVITY 256,258Fm(SF), 256,258,262No(SF); calculated kinetic energy and charge distribution of fission fragments using a statistical model.
doi: 10.1134/S1063778807090268
2006AN06 Phys.Atomic Nuclei 69, 197 (2006); Yad.Fiz. 69, 219 (2006) A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko, S.P.Ivanova, W.Scheid Effects of Nuclear Deformation in Dinuclear Systems: Application to the Fission Process NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 102Zr, 108Mo, 132Sn; calculated surface energy, Coulomb energy, shell correction, potential energy vs deformation. 234U, 240Pu, 258Fm; calculated potential energy surfaces for dinuclear systems. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 234,236U, 240Pu, 250Cf(n, F), E=thermal; 232Th(γ, F), E not given; calculated fission fragments kinetic energies. Improved scission-point model. RADIOACTIVITY 252Cf, 258Fm, 258No(SF); calculated fission fragments kinetic energies. Improved scission-point model.
doi: 10.1134/S1063778806020049
2005AN32 Eur.Phys.J. A 26, 327 (2005) A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko, S.P.Ivanova Bimodality and charge splitting in fission of actinides NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E=thermal; calculated potential energy of scission configurations, deformation parameters, kinetic energies. 239Pu(n, F), E=thermal; calculated deformation parameters, kinetic energies. Comparison with data. RADIOACTIVITY 258Fm(SF); calculated potential energy of scission configurations, deformation parameters, fission fragment kinetic energies and mass distributions. 256,258,262No, 256Fm, 252Cf(SF); calculated deformation parameters, kinetic energies. 258No(SF); calculated fission fragment kinetic energies and mass distributions. Comparison with data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2005-10179-x
2004AN26 Eur.Phys.J. A 22, 51 (2004) A.V.Andreev, G.G.Adamian, N.V.Antonenko, S.P.Ivanova, W.Scheid Possible explanation of fine structures in mass-energy distribution of fission fragments NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 232Th, 234,236U, 240Pu, 250,252Cf, 256No, 258Fm; calculated fission fragments mean kinetic energy, related features. Improved scission point model, comparison with data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2004-10017-9
2003AD31 Acta Phys.Pol. B34, 2147 (2003) G.G.Adamian, A.V.Andreev, N.V.Antonenko, S.P.Ivanova, R.V.Jolos, W.Scheid, T.M.Shneidman Dinuclear system phenomena in nuclear structure and nuclear reactions NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 146Ba, 148Nd, 222Ra, 242Pu; calculated level energies for alternating-parity states. 194Hg, 194Pb, 234,236,238U, 236,239,240Pu, 240Am, 230,231,233Th; calculated cluster states quadrupole moments, related features. Dinuclear system approach, comparison with data.
2003AD34 Acta Phys.Hung.N.S. 18, 311 (2003) G.G.Adamian, A.V.Andreev, N.V.Antonenko, S.P.Ivanova, N.Nenoff, W.Scheid, T.M.Shneidman Cluster Interpretation of Highly Deformed Nuclear States NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 194Hg, 194Pb, 236,238U, 236,239,240Pu, 240Am, 230,231,233Th, 234,236U; calculated superdeformed and hyperdeformed cluster configurations transition energies. Dinuclear system approach.
doi: 10.1556/APH.18.2003.2-4.32
2002AN37 Hyperfine Interactions 143, 13 (2002) Nuclear Excitation by X-Ray Emission of Femtosecond Laser Plasma
doi: 10.1023/A:1024013029627
2002AN38 Hyperfine Interactions 143, 23 (2002) A.V.Andreev, O.V.Chutko, A.M.Dykhne, V.M.Gordienko, M.A.Joukov, P.M.Mikheev, E.V.Petrova, A.A.Rusanov, A.B.Savel'ev, E.V.Tkalya Non-Linear Excitation and Decay of Low-Energy Nuclear Isomers Produced under Femtosecond Laser-Plasma Interaction NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 57Fe, 73Ge, 181Ta, 203Hg; analyzed levels, ICC, ionization effects. Role of plasma dynamics discussed.
doi: 10.1023/A:1024025432353
1999AN16 Pisma Zh.Eksp.Teor.Fiz. 69, 343 (1999); JETP Lett. 69, 371 (1999) A.V.Andreev, R.V.Volkov, V.M.Gordienko, P.M.Mikheev, A.B.Savelev, E.V.Tkalya, O.V.Chutko, A.A.Shashkov, A.M.Dykhne Excitation of Tantalum-181 Nuclei in a High-Temperature Femtosecond Laser Plasma NUCLEAR REACTIONS 181Ta(γ, γ')181mTa, E=low; measured Eγ, Iγ(t); deduced isomer excitation rate in laser-induced plasma, possible ionization effects.
doi: 10.1134/1.568036
1998AN27 Bull.Rus.Acad.Sci.Phys. 62, 211 (1998) A.V.Andreev, R.V.Volkov, V.M.Gordienko, P.M.Mikheev, A.B.Saveliev The Possibility of Exciting a Low-Lying Level of 201Hg Isomer in the High-Temperature Femtosecond Plasma NUCLEAR REACTIONS 201Hg(γ, X), E=1.56 keV; calculated probability for excitation of isomeric state in high-density plasma. Femtosecond laser-induced high-temperature plasma.
1990KR08 Hyperfine Interactions 59, 391 (1990) V.I.Krylov, A.V.Andreev, V.Sechovsky, L.Havela Magnetic Hyperfine Fields on 119Sn Nuclei in Uranium Compounds NUCLEAR REACTIONS 119Sn(γ, γ), E=23.87 MeV; measured Mossbauer spectra; deduced magnetic hyperfine fields in Uranium compounds.
doi: 10.1007/BF02401255
Back to query form |