NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = F.A.Ivanyuk Found 56 matches. 2024IV01 Phys.Rev. C 109, 034602 (2024) F.A.Ivanyuk, C.Ishizuka, S.Chiba Five-dimensional Langevin approach to fission of atomic nuclei
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.109.034602
2022IV05 Nucl.Phys. A1028, 122526 (2022) F.A.Ivanyuk, S.V.Radionov, C.Ishizuka, S.Chiba The memory effects in the Langevin description of nuclear fission
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122526
2021SH36 Phys.Rev. C 104, 054609 (2021) K.Shimada, C.Ishizuka, F.A.Ivanyuk, S.Chiba Dependence of total kinetic energy of fission fragments on the excitation energy of fissioning systems NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F)236U*,239Pu(n, F)240Pu*, E=thermal MeV; calculated mass distribution of fission fragments, fission product yields, and compared with experimental results and with data in JENDL/FPY-2011 library. 235U(n, F)236U*,239Pu(n, F)240Pu*, E<50 MeV; calculated average total kinetic energy (TKE) of fission fragments, quadrupole moment (Q20) of fission fragments just after scission, dependence of average quadrupole moment (Q20) and average octupole (Q30) of fission fragments, distance between the center of mass of the nascent fragments just after scission using method based on the four-dimensional Langevin equations. Comparison with experimental data. Relevance to decrease of average total kinetic energy of fission fragments as the excitation energy of the compound nuclei increases, as indicated by experimental data of neutron-induced fission reactions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.054609
2020IS01 Phys.Rev. C 101, 011601 (2020) C.Ishizuka, X.Zhang, M.D.Usang, F.A.Ivanyuk, S.Chiba Effect of the doubly magic shell closures in 132Sn and 208Pb on the mass distributions of fission fragments of superheavy nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 274Hs, 280Ds, 286Cn, 292Fl, 296Lv, 294Og, 302120, 306122; calculated fission fragment mass distributions for the excitation energy 10 and 30 MeV as a function of fragment mass number; deduced effect of doubly magic nuclei 132Sn and 208Pb on the mass distributions of fission fragments of superheavy nuclei 236U, 240Pu, 244Cm, 252Cf, 256,257,258,259,264Fm, 260Md, 259Lr, 274Hs, 286Cn, 292Fl, 296Lv, 294Og, 302120, 306122; calculated distribution of quadrupole deformation Q20 as function of fission fragment mass number. Calculations used dynamical four-dimensional Langevin approach.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.011601
2020LI21 Phys.Rev. C 101, 064616 (2020) V.L.Litnevsky, F.A.Ivanyuk, G.I.Kosenko, S.Chiba Formation of superheavy nuclei in 36S 238U and 64Ni 238U reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(36S, X)274Hs*, E*=35.8, 41.6, 47.3, 57.7 MeV; 238U(64Ni, X)302120*, E*=23.2, 33.5, 45.2, 64.1 MeV; calculated capture, fusion, fission, and evaporation residue formation σ(E), and neutron emission probabilities. Comparison with experimental results for 238U+36S, and with other theoretical calculations for 238U+64Ni.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.064616
2019CA15 Phys.Rev. C 99, 064606 (2019) N.Carjan, F.A.Ivanyuk, Yu.Ts.Oganessian Fission of superheavy nuclei: Fragment mass distributions and their dependence on excitation energy RADIOACTIVITY 252,254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270No, 264,266,268,270,272,274,276,278Hs, 276,278,280,282,284,286Cn, 290,291,292,293Lv, 268,270,272,274,276,278,280,282,284,288,292Ds, 254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268,270Rf, 272,274,276,280,284,285,286,287,288,292,296,298,300,304Fl, 276,280,284,288,292,294,296,300,304Og(SF); calculated average mass of light and heavy fission fragments, fission fragment mass distribution, average total kinetic energy of fission fragments, second moments of the total kinetic energy distribution of fission using a prescission point model.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064606
2019LI27 Phys.Rev. C 99, 054624 (2019) V.L.Litnevsky, F.A.Ivanyuk, G.I.Kosenko, S.Chiba Description of the mass-asymmetric fission of the Pt isotopes, obtained in the reaction 36Ar + 142Nd within the two-stage fusion-fission model NUCLEAR REACTIONS 142Nd(36Ar, X)178Pt*,142Nd(36Ar, xn), E(cm)=122.78, 134.68, 142.58 MeV; calculated potential energy of projectile-target system, partial σ(E), fission fragment mass distribution, mass-energy distribution of fission events, and deformation energy and potential energy surface of 178Pt compound nucleus before neutron evaporation, neutron evaporation probability. Two-stage dynamical stochastic model. Comparison with experimental data. 178Pt; calculated deformation and potential energy surfaces.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.054624
2018IV04 Phys.Rev. C 97, 054331 (2018) F.A.Ivanyuk, C.Ishizuka, M.D.Usang, S.Chiba Temperature dependence of shell corrections NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 236U; calculated temperature dependence of shell corrections and averaged in deformation to the energy, entropy and free energy for protons and neutrons of 236U g.s. with and without pairing effects using mean-field approximation; deduced more accurate approximation for the shell corrections to energy and free energy. A=50-250; calculated pairing critical temperature for protons and neutrons along the β-stability line. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 232Th, 238U(n, F), E=32.8, 45.3, 59.9 MeV; calculated fission fragment mass distributions using new shell corrections to the liquid drop energy and deformed Woods-Saxon potential. Comparison with experimental values and predictions from previous shell corrections.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.054331
2017CA29 Nucl.Phys. A968, 453 (2017) N.Carjan, F.A.Ivanyuk, Yu.Ts.Oganessian Pre-scission model predictions of fission fragment mass distributions for super-heavy elements RADIOACTIVITY 279,280,281Ds, 281Rg, 282,283,284Cn, 284,285,286Fl[from superheavies produced in 48Ca impacting neutron-rich transuranium targets and sequentiual α-decays]; calculated relative yields from 279,281Ds, 281Rg, 282,284Cn vs mass number and vs TKE, potential energy surfaces, deformation of 280Ds and 284Cn. Fl, Lv, Og, Z=126(SF); calculated fragment mass distribution. 284,304Fl, 308,328126; calculated potential energy surface, deformation vs fragment mass. 274,276,278,280,282Fl; calculated yields vs fragment mass, potential energy surface, deformation. 252,254,256,258,262No; calculated fragment mass distribution, yield vs TKER; compared with data; deduced effect of octupole deformation on TKE and mass distribution. Calculations done using Strutinsky prescription, nuclear shapes prior to fission descibed using Cassinian ovals. Deformation described using α1, α3, α4 and α6 parameters.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.06.048
2017IS16 Phys.Rev. C 96, 064616 (2017) C.Ishizuka, M.D.Usang, F.A.Ivanyuk, J.A.Maruhn, K.Nishio, S.Chiba Four-dimensional Langevin approach to low-energy nuclear fission of 236U NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E=14 MeV; 257Fm(n, F), E=thermal; calculated mass distribution of fission fragments, fission events on the mass-TKE plane, TKE distributions. 235U(n, F), E=0.5, 3.5, 5.5, 8.5, 13.5 MeV; calculated TKE of fission fragments, contour map of prescission kinetic energy as a function of mass number of fission fragments, distribution of deformation parameter in its dependence on the mass number. Four-dimensional (4D) Langevin model with infinite-depth two-center shell-model (TCSM) potential and the finite-depth two-center Woods-Saxon (TCWS) potential. Comparison with experimental data in JENDL/FPY-2011 data library.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.064616
2017PO06 Eur.Phys.J. A 53, 59 (2017) K.Pomorski, F.A.Ivanyuk, B.Nerlo-Pomorska Mass distribution of fission fragments within the Born-Oppenheimer approximation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 236U; calculated potential energy surface, deformation of fissioning nucleus, neck radius, fission probability using approximate solution of collective Hamiltonian describing the fission process. Compared to data. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, f), E=thermal; calculated fission fragment yields using approximate solution of collective Hamiltonian describing the fission process. Compared to data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2017-12250-5
2017US02 Phys.Rev. C 96, 064617 (2017) M.D.Usang, F.A.Ivanyuk, C.Ishizuka, S.Chiba Analysis of the total kinetic energy of fission fragments with the Langevin equation NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E=14 MeV; 257Fm(n, F), E=thermal; 231Pa, 238U, 239Pu(n, F), E<45 MeV; calculated mass distribution and the total kinetic energy (TKE) of fission fragments at various excitation energies within the three-dimensional Langevin approach with microscopic transport coefficients; deduced systematic trends of TKE with Z2/A1/3 of the fissioning system. Comparison with evaluated post-neutron distributions data stored in JENDL library.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.064617
2016LI32 Phys.Rev. C 93, 064606 (2016) V.L.Litnevsky, G.I.Kosenko, F.A.Ivanyuk Description of fusion and evaporation residue formation cross sections in reactions leading to the formation of element Z=122 within the Langevin approach NUCLEAR REACTIONS 248Cm(58Fe, xn), 244Pu(64Ni, xn), 208Pb(90Zr, xn), E not given; calculated cross sections of touching, fusion, and evaporation residue formation, dependence of the touching and fusion cross sections on the angular momentum in connection with the synthesis of Z=122 isotopes. Dynamical multidimensional stochastic approach, based on Langevin equations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.064606
2016LI55 Phys.Atomic Nuclei 79, 342 (2016); Yad.Fiz. 79, 236 (2016) V.L.Litnevsky, G.I.Kosenko, F.A.Ivanyuk Allowance for the tunnel effect in the entrance channel of fusion-fission reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U, 244Pu, 248Cm(48Ca, x), E*=20-50 MeV;248Cm(54Cr, x), E*=20-50 MeV;248Cm(58Fe, x), E*=20-50 MeV;208Pb(90Zr, x), E=20-50 MeV;244Pu(64Ni, x), E*=20-50 MeV;248Cm(58Fe, x), E*=20-50 MeV; calculated grazing σ, capture σ using two-stage model with and without allowance for tunelling effect. Compared with data. 208Pb(48Ca, x), E*=20-50 MeV; calculated capture σ. Compared with data. Deduced possibility for tunelling effect.
doi: 10.1134/S1063778816020113
2016US04 Phys.Rev. C 94, 044602 (2016) M.D.Usang, F.A.Ivanyuk, C.Ishizuka, S.Chiba Effects of microscopic transport coefficients on fission observables calculated by the Langevin equation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 234,236U, 240Pu; calculated fission fragment mass distribution, total kinetic energy, microscopic transport coefficients for fission of compound nuclei at an excitation energy of 20 MeV. Three-dimensional Langevin model. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.044602
2015CA19 Nucl.Phys. A942, 97 (2015) N.Carjan, F.A.Ivanyuk, Yu.Oganessian, G.Ter-Akopian Fission of transactinide elements described in terms of generalized Cassinian ovals: Fragment mass and total kinetic energy distributions NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 254,264Fm, 254,264Rf; calculated potential energy surface vs mass asymmetry and elongation, scission shapes at fission. 246,248,250,252,254,256,258,260,262,264Fm, 254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268Rf; calculated mass distribution and total kinetic energy distribution. 252,254,256,258,260,262,264No, 258,260,262,264,266,268Sg; calculated mass distribution. Generalized Cassinian ovals.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.07.019
2014IV06 Phys.Rev. C 90, 054607 (2014) F.A.Ivanyuk, S.Chiba, Y.Aritomo Scission-point configuration within the two-center shell model shape parameterization NUCLEAR REACTIONS 236U(n, F), E=thermal; calculated total deformation energy, shell component of scission point deformation energy, total energy (liquid drop plus shell correction) at the scission point, deformation energy before and after scission as function of elongation and heavy fragment mass number, mass distribution of fission fragments, excitation energy available for prompt neutron emission. 233Th, 236U, 240Pu, 246Cm(n, F), E=thermal; calculated total kinetic energies (TKEs), total excitation energies during the neck rupture. 232Th, 233,235,238U, 237Np, 239,240,241Pu, 241,243Am, 245Cm(n, F), E not given; calculated total neutron multiplicity. Optimal shape descriptions for fissioning systems. Two-center shell model parameterization for scission-point configuration. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054607
2014IV08 Phys.Scr. 89, 054012 (2014) The shell effects in the scission-point configuration of fissioning nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 236U; calculated energy scission point surface vs deformation using macroscopic-microscopic model. NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235U(n, F), E=thermal; calculated fission fragments total kinetic energy vs mass number. Compared with available data.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/89/5/054012
2014LI06 Phys.Rev. C 89, 034626 (2014) V.L.Litnevsky, V.V.Pashkevich, G.I.Kosenko, F.A.Ivanyuk Description of synthesis of super-heavy elements within the multidimensional stochastic model NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(64Ni, xn), E(cm)=250-350 MeV; 244Pu(58Fe, xn), E=230-350 MeV; 248Cm(48Ca, xn), E=180-280 MeV; 248Cm(54Cr, xn), E(cm)=225-350 MeV; calculated capture σ(E), yield of quasi-fission fragments in the fission of Z=116 isotopes produced in 248Cm+48Ca reaction, fission barrier heights of Z=116 and 120 systems, crossing fission barrier σ(E), evaporation residue σ(E) for Z=116 and 120 superheavy elements. Two-stage reaction model for fusion-fission processes. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.034626
2013IV04 Phys.Scr. T154, 014021 (2013) On the Poincare instability of a rotating liquid drop NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 58Ni; calculated yrast lines and dependencies; deduced break-up of reflection symmetric shapes appears in light nuclei at high angular momenta when non-axial degrees of freedom are taken into account. The optimal shape theory of Strutinsky.
doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T154/014021
2012LI13 Phys.Atomic Nuclei 75, 37 (2012); Yad.Fiz. 75, 39 (2012) V.L.Litnevsky, G.I.Kosenko, F.A.Ivanyuk, V.V.Pashkevich Allowance for the shell structure of the 10042Mo and 11046Pd nuclei in the synthesis of 20084Po, 21088Ra, and 22092U NUCLEAR REACTIONS 100Mo(100Mo, X)200Po, 100Mo(110Pd, X)210Ra, 110Pd(110Pd, X)220U, E(cm) < 300 MeV; calculated potential energy surfaces, σ, touching probabilities. Fusion-fission reactions involving nuclei deformed in the ground state.
doi: 10.1134/S1063778812010115
2012LI17 Phys.Rev. C 85, 034602 (2012) V.L.Litnevsky, V.V.Pashkevich, G.I.Kosenko, F.A.Ivanyuk Influence of the shell structure of colliding nuclei in fusion-fission reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(16O, X)224Th, 208Pb(18O, X)226Th, E(cm)=70-96 MeV; 208Pb(48Ca, X)256No, E(cm)=170-205 MeV; calculated fusion and evaporation residue cross sections, yield of fission fragments, mass-energy distribution of fission fragments. Two-stage reaction model for fusion-fission process, Langevin equations for the collective coordinates. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.034602
2012LI55 Phys.Atomic Nuclei 75, 1500 (2012); Yad.Fiz. 75, 1579 (2012) V.L.Litnevsky, G.I.Kosenko, F.A.Ivanyuk, V.V.Pashkevich Allowance for the orientation of colliding ions in describing the synthesis of heavy nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 100Mo(100Mo, X)200Po, 208Pb(16O, X)224Th, 100Mo(110Pd, X)210Ra, 110Pd(110Pd, X)220U, E(cm)<95 MeV; analyzed available data; calculated σ. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1134/S1063778812110142
2010LI50 Iader.Fiz.Enerh. 11, 341 (2010); Nuc.phys.atom.energ. 11, 341 (2010) V.L.Litnevsky, F.A.Ivanyuk, G.I.Kosenko, V.V.Pashkevich The fusion of heavy ions within the two step reaction model NUCLEAR REACTIONS 100Mo(100Mo, X)200Po, 208Pb(18O, X)226Th, E(cm)<260 MeV; calculated deformation energy, touching probability. Two stage model of fusion-fission reactions is extended by the account of the shell structure of colliding nuclei.
2009IV01 Phys.Rev. C 79, 054327 (2009) Optimal shapes and fission barriers of nuclei within the liquid drop model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=35-110; calculated fission barriers, shapes and heights using Lublin-Strasbourg drop model calculations. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.054327
2008KO30 Phys.Atomic Nuclei 71, 2052 (2008); Yad.Fiz. 71, 2086 (2008) G.I.Kosenko, F.A.Ivanyuk, V.V.Pashkevich, D.V.Dinner Application of a two-step dynamical model to calculating properties of fusion-fission reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 244Pu(48Ca, X), E=238 MeV; calculated partial touching cross sections.
doi: 10.1134/S1063778808120065
2007IV02 Iader.Fiz.Enerh. 8 no.4, 19 (2007); Nuc.phys.atom.energ. 8, no.4, 19 (2007) The transport coefficients for slow collective motion NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 224Th, 292Fl; calculated friction coefficients for collective motion, dependence on nuclear temperature and deformation parameters, effects of rotation and potential energy.
doi: 10.15407/jnpae
2005AB31 Iader.Fiz.Enerh. 6 no.2, 7 (2005) V. M. Strutinsky (1929 - 1993)
doi: 10.15407/jnpae
2005IV03 Phys.Rev.Lett. 95, 082501 (2005) Diabatic States from Nodal Structure Conservation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 224Th; calculated single-particle energies and spreading widths vs deformation. Diabatic states, Woods-Saxon potential.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.082501
2003HO05 Phys.Rev.Lett. 90, 132701 (2003) Mean First Passage Time for Nuclear Fission and the Emission of Light Particles
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.132701
2003HO39 Acta Phys.Hung.N.S. 18, 377 (2003) Time Scales for Fission at Finite Temperature
doi: 10.1556/APH.18.2003.2-4.45
2002KO47 Yad.Fiz. 65, 1629 (2002); Phys.Atomic Nuclei 65, 1588 (2002) G.I.Kosenko, F.A.Ivanyuk, V.V.Pashkevich Multidimensional Langevin Approach to Describing the 18O + 208Pb Fusion-Fission Reaction NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(18O, X), E(cm) ≈ 70-100 MeV; calculated potential energy features, fusion σ, fission fragment mass distributions, related features. Multi-step approach, Langevin equations.
doi: 10.1134/1.1508690
2002KO72 J.Nucl.Radiochem.Sci. 3, No 1, 71 (2002) G.I.Kosenko, F.A.Ivanyuk, V.V.Pashkevich The Multi-dimensional Langevin Approach to the Description of Fusion-fission Reaction NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(18O, X), E(cm) ≈ 70-95 MeV; calculated fusion, fission σ, fragment mass distributions, neutron multiplicity. Comparison with data.
2002RA24 Yad.Fiz. 65, 856 (2002); Phys.Atomic Nuclei 65, 824 (2002) S.V.Radionov, F.A.Ivanyuk, V.M.Kolomietz, A.G.Magner Fission Dynamics of Excited Nuclei within the Liquid-Drop Model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 236U; calculated fission fragments kinetic energies, scission time, other fission dynamics features for decay of excited nucleus. Liquid-drop model.
doi: 10.1134/1.1481473
2001HO31 Phys.Rev. C64, 054316 (2001) H.Hofmann, F.A.Ivanyuk, C.Rummel, S.Yamaji Nuclear Fission: The ' onset of dissipation ' from a microscopic point of view NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 224Th; calculated temperature dependence of fission rate, related parameters. Semianalytical expressions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.64.054316
2001IV05 Nucl.Phys. A694, 295 (2001) The Effect of Nuclear Rotation on the Collective Transport Coefficients NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 224Th; calculated friction and mass coefficients for collective motion, effects of rotation and potential energy.
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(01)00990-3
2001RA46 Iader.Fiz.Enerh. 2 no 1, 19 (2001); Nuc.phys.atom.energ. 2, no.1, 28 (2001) S.V.Radionov, F.A.Ivanyuk, V.M.Kolomietz, A.G.Magner Viscosity effects at the nuclear descent from the fission barrier NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 236U; calculated scission time, time evolution for fissioning system, other fission dynamics features for decay of excited nucleus. Liquid-drop model.
doi: 10.15407/jnpae
2000IV08 Bull.Rus.Acad.Sci.Phys. 64, 412 (2000) Effect of Pairing on Collective Nuclear Dynamics NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 224Th; calculated response functions, collective friction and mass parameter tensors, pairing effects.
1999HO14 Phys.Rev.Lett. 82, 4603 (1999) Nuclear Transport at Low Excitations NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 224Th; calculated transport coefficients.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4603
1999IV02 Acta Phys.Slovaca 49, 53 (1999) The Transport Coefficients for Fusion-Fission Reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(18O, X), 249Cf(20Ne, X), 238U(48Ca, X), E not given; calculated compound systems collective friction, inertia tensors.
1999IV09 Nucl.Phys. A657, 19 (1999) Pairing and Shell Effects in the Transport Coefficients of Collective Motion NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 224Th; calculated response functions, transport coefficients, friction coefficients; deduced shell and pairing effects. Woods-Saxon potential, particle number conservation.
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00324-3
1997IV01 Phys.Rev. C55, 1730 (1997) F.A.Ivanyuk, H.Hofmann, V.V.Pashkevich, S.Yamaji Transport Coefficients for Shape Degrees in Terms of Cassini Ovaloids NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 224Th; calculated deformation energy along liquid drop fission valley, time-dependent nucleon response. Shape degrees transport coefficients in terms of Cassini ovaloids.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.55.1730
1997YA01 Nucl.Phys. A612, 1 (1997) S.Yamaji, F.A.Ivanyuk, H.Hofmann Variation of Transport Coefficients for Average Fission Dynamics with Temperature and Shape NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 224Th; calculated liquid drop energy surface, free energy, local stiffness vs model parameters. 224Th, 140Yb, 206Pb; calculated friction coefficient vs temperature; deduced average fission dynamics transport coefficients variation with temperature, shape. Linear response theory, locally harmonic approximation.
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(96)00275-8
1996HO03 Nucl.Phys. A598, 187 (1996) H.Hofmann, F.A.Ivanyuk, S.Yamaji On the Nature of Nuclear Dissipation, as a Hallmark for Collective Dynamics at Finite Excitation
doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(95)00442-4
1996IV01 Phys.Rev. C53, 1861 (1996) Collective Friction Coefficients in the Relaxation Time Approximation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb, 160Yb; calculated collective friction coefficients. Relaxation time approximation framework.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.53.1861
1995IV02 Phys.Rev. C52, 678 (1995) F.A.Ivanyuk, V.M.Kolomietz, A.G.Magner Liquid Drop Surface Dynamics for Large Nuclear Deformations
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.52.678
1993KO58 Bull.Rus.Acad.Sci.Phys. 57, 1684 (1993) V.M.Kolomiets, A.G.Magner, F.A.Ivanyuk A Variational Principle for Macroscopic Dynamics of Large Deformations of Nuclei
1992KI25 Nucl.Phys. A550, 473 (1992) D.Kiderlen, H.Hofmann, F.A.Ivanyuk Dynamical Aspects of Thermal Nuclear Properties NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb; calculated free energy local stiffness, correction term vs degrees of freedom. Liquid drop model. Dynamical aspects treated in locally harmonic approximation, collective motion.
doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(92)90019-G
1990AL41 Izv.Akad.Nauk SSSR, Ser.Fiz. 54, 861 (1990); Bull.Acad.Sci.USSR, Phys.Ser. 54, No.5, 45 (1990) The Form of Intermediate Systems in Fusion-Fission Reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS Ag(35Cl, αF), E=350 MeV; 124Sn(37Cl, αF), E=200-254 MeV; 141Pr(28Si, αF), E=318 MeV; analyzed σ(θα), Eα following fission. Semi-classical approach.
1988ST21 Izv.Akad.Nauk SSSR, Ser.Fiz. 52, 834 (1988); Bull.Acad.Sci.USSR, Phys.Ser. 52, No.5, 1 (1988) V.M.Strutinsky, F.A.Ivanyuk, V.V.Pashkevich Highly Deformed States in Rotating Nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 152Dy, 132Ce; calculated deformation energies. Rotating nuclei.
1984IV01 Z.Phys. A316, 233 (1984) Shell Corrections for Finite Depth Potentials. 3. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE N=80-200; calculated shell correction factors. Z=50-120; calculated proton shell correction factors. N=100-160; calculated neutron shell correction factors; deduced parameters. Finite depth potentials.
doi: 10.1007/BF01412268
1984IV02 Yad.Fiz. 40, 1430 (1984); Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 40, 908 (1984) Determination of Shell Corrections for Finite-Depth Potentials NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb; calculated proton, neutron shell corrections. N=80-200; calculated neutron shell corrections. N=146; calculated neutron shell correction deformation parameter dependence.
1980ST30 Yad.Fiz. 31, 88 (1980); Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 31, 46 (1980) V.M.Strutinsky, F.A.Ivanyuk, V.V.Pashkevich Accuracy of Calculations of Shell Corrections NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb, 204Hg, 196Os; calculated shell correction energies for protons, neutrons; deduced accuracy conditions. Woods-Saxon potential, harmonic oscillator basis.
1979IV01 Z.Phys. A290, 107 (1979) Shell Corrections for Finite Depth Deformed Potentials. II NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 238U; calculated deformation energies. Smooth level densities including shell corrections for finite depth potentials.
doi: 10.1007/BF01408485
1975BU25 Yad.Fiz. 22, 1142 (1975); Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 22, 595 (1975) V.V.Burov, F.A.Ivanyuk, B.D.Konstantinov Effect of Oscillations of Nuclear Charge Density in Electron Elastic Scattering NUCLEAR REACTIONS 40Ca, 66Zn, 208Pb(e, e); calculated form factors. Strutinskii shell-correction method.
1973IV04 Yad.Fiz. 18, 1203 (1973); Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 18, 616 (1974) Influence of Nuclear Shell Structure on the Polarization of Elastically Scattered Neutrons NUCLEAR REACTIONS Ca(n, n), E=6 MeV; Ni(n, n), E=11 MeV; Pb(n, n), E=14 MeV; calculated P(θ).
Back to query form |