NSR Query Results

Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 27, 2024.

Search: Author = B.Sahu

Found 42 matches.

Back to query form

2023JE03      Acta Phys.Pol. A143, 4-A1 (2023)

K.K.Jena, B.Sahu, J.K.Nayak, P.R.Preethi, B.K.Sharma, S.K.Agarwalla

Simultaneous Study of Scattering and Fusion Hindrance Near Coulomb Barrier in F+Pb Systems

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰⁸Pb(¹⁹F, ¹⁹F), (¹⁹F, X), E(cm)=80.6-94 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced energy-dependent parameters of the optical potential, fusion σ. The paradigm of the Ginocchio potential.

doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.54.4-A1
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022DA16      Chin.Phys.C 46, 124104 (2022)

C.Dash, R.R.Swain, G.Tripathy, I.Naik, B.B.Sahu

Scattering and fusion reaction dynamics of O + Zr system around Coulomb barrier

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁹²Zr(¹⁶O, X), (¹⁶O, ¹⁶O), E=45-56 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced optical model parameters, σ, fusion σ, isotopic dependence of fusion probability, a partial wave scattering matrix for the total effective complex potential of nucleus nucleus collisions.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac92d9
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022JE03      Acta Phys.Pol. B53, 10-A1 (2022)

K.K.Jena, S.K.Agarwalla, B.Sahu

Study of Non-trivial Behavior in the Analysis of ⁵⁸Ni + ²⁷Al Elastic Scattering Around the Coulomb Barrier

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁷Al(⁵⁸Ni, ⁵⁸Ni), E(cm)=48.8-69.5 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced σ, optical model parameters, threshold anomaly.

doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.53.10-A1
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021SA29      J.Phys.(London) G48, 035103 (2021)

B.Sahu

Two-delta shell resonance description of α-decay: analytic expression of half-life via energy derivative of phase-shift

RADIOACTIVITY ^{190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206}Po(α); calculated T_1/2, resonance energies. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/abcd1d
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020SW01      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E29, 2050016 (2020)

R.R.Swain, C.Dash, P.Mohanty, B.B.Sahu

Scattering and fusion phenomena of ⁶Li + ²⁰⁹Bi system

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰⁹Bi(⁶Li, ⁶Li), (⁶Li, X), E<50 MeV; calculated scattering and fusion σ. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1142/S0218301320500160
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019SW02      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E28, 1950041 (2019)

R.R.Swain, B.B.Sahu, P.K.Moharana, S.K.Patra

Nuclear structure and α-decay study of Og isotopes

RADIOACTIVITY ^{290,292,294,296,298,300,302,304,306,308,310}Og(α); calculated T_1/2, Q-value. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1142/S0218301319500411
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019SW03      Chin.Phys.C 43, 104103 (2019)

R.R.Swain, B.B.Sahu

Structure and reaction dynamics of SHE Z = 130

RADIOACTIVITY ^{310,311,312,313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320,321,322,323,324,325,326,327,328}130(α), ^{329,330,331,332,333,334,335,336,337,338,339,340}130(SF); calculated Q-values, binding energies, quadrupole deformation parameters, nuclear radii.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/43/10/104103
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2018BH03      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E27, 1850048 (2018)

S.Bhoi, B.Sahu

Unearthing radial independence for prediction of alpha-decay half-lives

RADIOACTIVITY ^106,108Te, ^112,114Xe, ^146,148Sm, ^148,150,152Gd, ^150,152,154Dy, ^152,154Er, ^154,156,158Yb, ^156,158,160Hf, ^{158,160,162,166}W, ^{162,166,168,170,174,176,178,182,184,190}Os, ^168,180,188Pt, ^{174,176,180,182,184,188}Hg, ^{188,186,190,210}Pb, ^{190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218}Po, ^{194,196,198,200,202,206,208,210,212,218,220,222}Rn, ^{204,206,208,210,212,214,220,222,224,226}Ra, ^{210,216,218,222,224,226,228,230,232}Th, ^{224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238}U, ^{230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244}Pu, ^{238,240,242,244,246,248}Cm, ^{240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254}Cf, ^{246,248,250,252,254,256}Fm, ^252,256No, ^256,258Rf, ^260,262Sg, ^264,266,270Hs, ²⁷⁰Ds, ^286,288Fl, ^290,292Lv, ²⁹⁴Og(α), ¹⁴¹Ho, ¹⁶⁵Ir, ¹⁷¹Au, ¹⁰⁹I, ¹⁵⁷Ta, ¹⁶¹Re, ¹⁶⁷Ir, ¹⁸⁵Bi, ¹⁷⁷Tl(p); calculated Q-values, T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1142/S0218301318500489
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2018SW01      Chin.Phys.C 42, 084102 (2018)

R.Swain, S.K.Patra, B.B.Sahu

Nuclear structure and decay modes of Ra isotopes within an axially deformed relativistic mean field model

RADIOACTIVITY ^{210,212,214,218,220,222,224}Ra(⁸Be), (α), ²²⁶Ra(α), ^{210,212,214,218,220}Ra(¹²C), (¹⁴C), ^224,226Ra(¹⁶C), ^210,212Ra(¹⁶O), ^{218,220,222,224}Ra(¹⁸O), ^222,224,226Ra(²⁰O), ²²⁶Ra(²²O); calculated Q-values, T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/8/084102
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2017SA62      Phys.Rev. C 96, 044602 (2017)

B.Sahu, S.Bhoi

Potential for α-induced nuclear scattering, reaction and decay, and a resonance-pole-decay model with exact explicit analytical solutions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰⁸Pb(α, α), (α, X), E=16-22 MeV; calculated elastic differential σ(θ, E), reaction σ(E) from optical model. Comparison with experimental data.

RADIOACTIVITY ^{190,194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218}Po(α); calculated α-decay half-lives using optical model and resonance pole of analytical S matrix, comparison with experimental values. ²¹⁰Pb, ^{212,214,216,218}Po, ^{214,216,218,220,222}Rn, ^{216,218,220,222,224,226}Ra, ^{216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232}Th, ^{222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238}U, ^{232,234,236,238,240,242,244}Pu, ^{240,242,244,246,248}Cm, ^{240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254}Cf, ^{246,248,250,252,254,256}Fm, ^252,254,256No, ^256,258Rf(α); calculated α-decay half-lives from resonance pole of analytical S matrix, and compared with experimental values. ¹¹²I, ^149,151Tb, ^159,162Ta, ¹⁷⁵Ir, ¹⁸¹Au, ^{191,193,195,212,213,214}Bi, ^210,212At, ^{210,212,214,220,221}Fr, ^{214,216,223,224,225,226}Ac, ^{214,225,228,229,230}Pa, ^235,237Np, ^{235,239,241,243}Am, ^245,249Bk, ^245,252Es, ²⁵⁷Md(α); calculated α-decay half-lives from the poles of the S matrix of the optical model, and compared with experimental values.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044602
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2016SA16      Phys.Rev. C 93, 044301 (2016)

B.Sahu, S.Bhoi

Viola-Seaborg relation for α-decay half-lives: Update and microscopic determination of parameters

RADIOACTIVITY ^106,108Te, ¹¹²Xe, ¹¹⁴Ba, ¹⁴⁴Nd, ^146,148Sm, ^148,150,152Gd, ^150,152,154Dy, ^152,154Er, ^154,156,158Yb, ^{156,158,160,162,174}Hf, ^{160,162,164,166,180}W, ^{162,166,168,170,172,174,186}Os, ^{168,170,174,176,178,180,188,190}Pt, ^{174,176,180,182,184,186,188}Hg, ^{178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210}Pb, ^{190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206,210,212,214,216,218}Po, ^{198,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222}Rn, ^{210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226}Ra, ^{216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232}Th, ^{226,228,230,232,234,236,238}U, ^{232,234,236,238,240,242,244}Pu, ^{238,240,242,244,246,248}Cm, ^{240,246,248,250,252,254}Cf, ^{246,248,250,252,254,256}Fm, ^252,254,256No, ^260,266Sg(α); calculated ground-state to ground-state (l=0) half-lives and compared with experimental values; deduced analytic closed formula, as possible replacement of empirical Viola-Seaborg rule.

RADIOACTIVITY ^144,145Nd, ^{145,146,147,148}Pm, ^{146,147,148,149,150}Sm, ^{130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,148,151}Eu, ^{135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,148,149,150,151,152,153}Gd, ^{136,137,138,139,140,141,142,144,145,149,150,151,152,154}Tb, ^{138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156}Dy, ^{140,141,142,143,144,145,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157}Ho, ^{145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,164}Er, ^{153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165}Tm, ^{154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,170}Yb, ^{155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174}Lu, ^{156,157,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178}Hf, ^{157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,179}Ta, ^{158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181}W, ^{160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,183,184,185,186}Re, ^{162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189}Os, ^{164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191}Ir, ^{166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193}Pt(α); calculated α-decay half-lives using analytical formula and parameters deduced in the present work. Comparison with available experimental results.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044301
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2014PA22      Pramana 82, 841 (2014)

K.C.Panda, B.C.Sahu, J.Bhoi

Accuracy of simple folding model in the calculation of the direct part of real α-α interaction potential

doi: 10.1007/s12043-014-0737-2
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2014SA19      Phys.Rev. C 89, 034614 (2014)

B.B.Sahu, S.K.Singh, M.Bhuyan, S.K.Biswal, S.K.Patra

Importance of nonlinearity in the NN potential

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ²⁰Ne, ³⁸Ar, ⁶⁶Zn, ⁹⁰Zr, ¹⁰⁵Sb, ¹¹²Cs, ¹¹⁴Cd, ¹⁴⁴Sm, ¹⁴⁷Tm, ¹⁹⁸Hg, ²³⁸U; calculated ground state binding energies, charge radii, and quadrupole deformation parameter using SH, L1 and NL3 interactions, and compared with experimental data. ¹⁶O, ²⁰⁸Pb, ²⁷⁰Ds; calculated binding energy from different fields of RMF Hamiltonian density with NL3 force, and compared with experimental data.

RADIOACTIVITY ¹⁰⁵Sb, ¹⁰⁹I, ^112,113Cs, ¹¹⁷La, ¹³¹Eu, ^140,141Ho, ^145,146,147Tm(p); calculated half-lives of proton emitters. Relativistic mean field theory (RMFT) with nonlinear self-coupling of the scalar meson field using NR3Y+EX, M3Y+EX and LR3Y+EX nucleon-nucleon interactions. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.034614
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2014SA28      Pramana 82, 717 (2014)

B.Sahu

Comprehensive decay law for emission of charged particles and exotic cluster radioactivity

doi: 10.1007/s12043-014-0723-8
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2013PA26      Phys.Rev. C 88, 034602 (2013)

K.C.Panda, B.C.Sahu, R.K.Gupta

Spin-density contribution in the optical potential of open j-shell nuclei

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰Ne(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=30.88 MeV; ⁴²Ca(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=43.45 MeV; ⁴⁴Ca(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=44 MeV; ⁵²Cr(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=45.88 MeV; ⁵⁴Fe(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=46.29 MeV; ⁵⁸Ni(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=47.03 MeV; ⁶²Ni(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=47.69 MeV; ⁶⁴Ni(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=48 MeV; ⁷⁴Ge(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=46.04 MeV; ⁷⁶Ge(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=46.26 MeV; ⁹²Zr(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=47.70 MeV; ⁶⁰Ni(¹⁸O, X), E(cm)=48.46 MeV; ⁶²Ni(¹⁸O, X), E(cm)=48.82 MeV; ⁶⁴Ni(¹⁸O, X), E(cm)=49.17 MeV; ⁷⁶Ge(¹⁸O, X), E(cm)=45.28 MeV; ³²S(²⁴Mg, X), E(cm)=68.57 MeV; ³⁶S(²⁴Mg, X), E(cm)=72 MeV; ³⁴S(³²S, X), E(cm)=49.97 MeV; ⁶²Ni(¹²C, X), E(cm)=40.22 MeV; ⁶⁴Ni(⁵⁸Ni, X), E(cm)=114.9 MeV; calculated energy-dependent real and imaginary parts of the optical potential of open j-shell nuclei, contribution of spin-density terms, effect of such contributions on elastic and sub-barrier fusion cross sections. Energy density model using the complex Skyrme III energy density.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.034602
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2013SA15      Nucl.Phys. A908, 40 (2013)

B.Sahu, R.Paira, B.Rath

General decay law for emission of charged particles and exotic cluster radioactivity

COMPILATION Z=58-117; compiled α-decay T_1/2; deduced simple dependence on Z, mass, Q. Z=52-117; compiled proton- and cluster-decay T_1/2; deduced simple dependence on Z, mass, Q. Suggested formula compared to data.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.04.002
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2012GH05      Phys.Rev. C 85, 064327 (2012)

S.K.Ghorui, B.B.Sahu, C.R.Praharaj, S.K.Patra

Examining the stability of Sm nuclei around N = 100

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ^{150,152,154,156,158,160,162,164}Sm; calculated binding energies, levels, J, π, B(E2), rms charge radius, quadrupole moment, total density distribution, quadrupole deformation parameter, prolate deformed HF neutron and proton orbits. Deformed Hartree-Fock, Skyrme Hartree-Fock+BCS, and relativistic mean-field calculations. Comparison with experimental data. Island of stability near the neutron drip line for N=100, Z AP 62.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.064327
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2012SA18      Phys.Rev. C 85, 057601 (2012)

B.Sahu

Extremely long α-decay lifetimes and predictions based on an analytical expression

RADIOACTIVITY ¹⁴⁴Nd, ^{146,147,148,149}Sm, ¹⁵¹Eu, ¹⁵²Gd, ¹⁵⁶Dy, ^162,164Er, ¹⁶⁸Yb, ^174,176Hf, ^180,183W, ^184,186,188Os, ¹⁹⁶Hg, ²⁰⁴Pb, ^{166,168,170,172,174,176,182,184,186,188,190,192}Pt(α); calculated Q(α), T_1/2. Analytical expression, exactly solvable global potential in potential scattering theory. Comparison with experimental data, and with calculations using modified two-potential approximation (MTPA) method.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.057601
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2012SA29      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E21, 1250067 (2012)

B.Sahu, B.B.Sahu

Analysis of nucleus-nucleus fusion cross-section at extreme sub-barrier energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰⁸Pb(¹⁶O, X), (¹⁶O, ¹⁶O), E=80-102 MeV; ²⁰⁸Pb(¹²C, X), (¹²C, ¹²C), E=58.9-84.9 MeV; ⁶⁴Ni(²⁸Si, X), (²⁸Si, ²⁸Si), E=50-76.5 MeV; calculated fusion σ, σ(θ) at extreme sub-barrier energy. Woods-Saxon nucleus-nucleus potential.

doi: 10.1142/S021830131250067X
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2011SA42      Phys.Rev. C 84, 037607 (2011)

B.Sahu

Prediction of α-decay half-lives and Q_α values of superheavy nuclei by a global potential for α + nucleus systems

RADIOACTIVITY ^{280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287}Cn, ^{280,281,283,284,288}Nh, ^{284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291}Fl, ^{285,286,287,288,291,292}Mc, ^{288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295}Lv, ^292,295Ts, ^293,294,295Og(α); calculated Q_α and half-lives; deduced global interaction potential for an α+nucleus system.Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.037607
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2011SA50      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E20, 2217 (2011)

B.K.Sahu, M.Bhuyan, S.Mahapatro, S.K.Patra

The α-decay chains of the ^{287, 288}115 isotopes using relativistic mean field theory

RADIOACTIVITY ²⁸⁷Mc, ²⁸³Nh, ²⁷⁹Rg, ²⁷⁵Mt, ²⁷¹Bh, ²⁸⁸Mc, ²⁸⁴Nh, ²⁸⁰Rg, ²⁷⁶Mt, ²⁷²Bh(α); calculated Q-value, T_1/2, rms radii, binding energies, two-neutron separation energy, quadrupole deformation parameter. RMF approach.

doi: 10.1142/S0218301311020277
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2011SA60      Phys.Rev. C 84, 054604 (2011)

B.Sahu, S.K.Agarwalla, S.K.Patra

Half-lives of proton emitters using relativistic mean field theory

RADIOACTIVITY ¹⁰⁵Sb, ¹⁰⁹I, ^112,113Cs, ^117,117mLa, ¹³¹Eu, ^140,141,141mHo, ^{145,146,146m,147,147m}Tm, ^{150,150m,151,151m}Lu, ^{155,156,156m,157}Ta, ^160,161,161mRe, ^{164,165,165m,166,166m,167,167m}Ir, ^171,171mAu, ^177,177mTl, ¹⁸⁵Bi(p); calculated half-lives using M3Y + EX and R3Y + EX NN interactions within the WKB approximation. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.054604
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2011SI14      Phys.Rev. C 83, 064601 (2011)

B.B.Singh, B.B.Sahu, S.K.Patra

α-decay and fusion phenomena in heavy ion collisions using nucleon-nucleon interactions derived from relativistic mean-field theory

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰⁸Pb(¹²C, X), E(cm)=55-90 MeV; ²⁰⁸Pb(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=70-110 meV; calculated barrier energies, fusion cross sections, fusion barrier distribution. Double-folding model for relativistic mean field-3-Yukawa (R3Y) interaction, comparison with Michigan-3-Yukawa (M3Y) effective NN interactions, and with experimental data.

RADIOACTIVITY ²²¹Fr, ^{221,222,223,224,226}Ra, ^223,225Ac, ^226,228,230Th, ^{230,232,233,234,236,238}U, ²³¹Pa, ²³⁷Np, ^236,238Pu, ²⁴¹Am, ²⁴²Cm(α); calculated penetrability. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.83.064601
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2008SA06      Phys.Rev. C 77, 024604 (2008)

B.Sahu, G.S.Mallick, B.B.Sahu, S.K.Agarwalla, C.S.Shastry

Unified description of scattering and fusion phenomena in heavy-ion collisions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰⁸Pb(¹²C, X), E(cm)=50-110 MeV; ²⁰⁸Pb(¹⁶O, X), E=55-95 MeV; calculated scattering and fusion cross sections.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.024604
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2008SA23      Pramana 70, 847 (2008)

B.Sahu, L.Satpathy

Resonance states in ¹⁶O+¹⁶O, ¹²C+¹⁶O, α+¹⁶O and α+¹²C with modified Morse potentials

doi: 10.1007/s12043-008-0094-0
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2008SA40      Phys.Rev. C 78, 044608 (2008)

B.Sahu

Analytical expression for the α-decay half-life and understanding the data including very long life-times and superheavy nuclei

RADIOACTIVITY ²⁷³Ds, ¹⁰⁵Te, ^156,158Yb, ^160,174Hf, ^158,168W, ^162,164Os, ^172,188Hg, ^{180,186,190,192,194}Pb, ¹⁵⁶Er, ^166,168,170Pt, ^172,174Hg, ^{188,189,190,192,210}Po, ^196,198Rn, ^210,212Th, ^{218,220,224,226}U, ^228,230Pu, ²³²Cm, ^258,260Rf, ^266,270Hs, ²⁷⁰Ds, ²⁰⁴Ra, ²³⁸No, ²⁷¹Sg, ²⁷²Bh, ²⁷⁵Hs, ^275,276Mt, ²⁷⁹Ds, ^279,280Rg, ^283,285Cn, ^282,283,284Nh, ^{286,287,288,289}Fl, ^287,288Mc, ^{290,291,292,293}Lv, ²⁹⁴Og(α); calculated half-lives. Analysis of the dimension of scattering problem α+daughter nucleus. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.78.044608
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2006AG01      J.Phys.(London) G32, 165 (2006)

S.K.Agarwalla, G.S.Mallik, P.Prema, S.Mahadevan, B.Sahu, C.S.Shastry

Analysis of ¹⁶O + ²⁸Si elastic scattering in the laboratory energy range 50.0 MeV to 142.5 MeV

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁸Si(¹⁶O, ¹⁶O), E=50.0-142.5 MeV; analyzed σ(θ); deduced enhanced back-angle oscillations. Phenomenological potential, comparison with Woods-Saxon approach.

doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/32/2/008
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2006MA33      Phys.Rev. C 73, 054606 (2006)

G.S.Mallick, S.K.Agarwalla, B.Sahu, C.S.Shastry

Analysis of elastic scattering of ¹⁶O+²⁸Si and ¹²C+²⁴Mg by a new optical potential

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁸Si(¹⁶O, ¹⁶O), E(cm)=18.7-90.7 MeV; ²⁴Mg(¹²C, ¹²C), E(cm)=10.7-16.0 MeV; calculated σ(θ). Phenomenological optical potential, comparison with data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.054606
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2003SA01      Nucl.Phys. A713, 45 (2003)

B.Sahu, S.K.Agarwalla, C.S.Shastry

Fusion barrier distribution described by above-barrier resonances

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁴⁴Sm, ²⁰⁸Pb(¹⁶O, X), E(cm) ≈ 54-92 MeV; calculated fusion σ, barrier distributions, above-barrier resonance contributions. Comparisons with data.

doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01289-7
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2003SA36      Nucl.Phys. A727, 299 (2003)

B.Sahu, G.S.Mallik, S.K.Agarwalla

Soluble complex potential model for heavy-ion collision: resonance and fusion in ¹²C + ¹²C reaction

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹²C(¹²C, ¹²C), E(cm)=7, 8 MeV; calculated σ(θ). ¹²C(¹²C, X), E(cm)=7-35 MeV; calculated reaction and fusion σ, resonance features. Complex potential model.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.08.010
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2003SA39      Pramana 61, 51 (2003)

B.Sahu, S.K.Agarwalla, C.S.Shastry

Fusion, resonances and scattering in ¹²C + ¹²C reaction

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹²C(¹²C, X), E(cm)=7-35 MeV; calculated fusion σ, resonance features. ¹²C(¹²C, X), E(cm)=2-7 MeV; calculated astrophysical S-factors. ¹²C(¹²C, ¹²C), E(cm)=6, 7, 8, 9 MeV; calculated elastic σ(θ). Optical model potential, comparisons with data.

doi: 10.1007/BF02704510
Citations: PlumX Metrics

1999SA41      J.Phys.(London) G25, 1909 (1999)

B.Sahu, C.S.Shastry

Asymmetric Parabolic Effective Barrier Model for Heavy Ion Fusion and Its Relation to Coupled Channel Effects

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^144,152Sm(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=50-75 MeV; ^46,48,50Ti(⁴⁰Ca, X), E(cm)=50-85 MeV; ⁶⁴Ni(⁵⁸Ni, X), E(cm)=90-115 MeV; ⁹²Zr(⁶⁴Ni, X), E(cm)=120-150 MeV; calculated fusion σ, spin distributions, barrier distributions. Asymmetric parabolic effective barrier model. Comparisons with data.

doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/310
Citations: PlumX Metrics

1999SA63      Pramana 53, 545 (1999)

B.Sahu, C.S.Shastry

Asymmetric Barrier Model for Heavy Ion Fusion and Its Relation to Channel Coupling

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^46,48,50Ti(⁴⁰Ca, X), E=100-150 MeV; analyzed fusion σ, barrier distributions. Asymmetric parabolic effective barrier.

doi: 10.1007/s12043-999-0028-5
Citations: PlumX Metrics

1998SA13      Phys.Rev. C57, 1853 (1998)

B.Sahu, I.Jamir, E.F.P.Lyngdoh, C.S.Shastry

Fusion Under a Complex Barrier

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^152,154Sm(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=53-73 MeV; ^58,64Ni(⁶⁴Ni, X), ⁵⁸Ni(⁵⁸Ni, X), E(cm)=90-110 MeV; ⁹²Zr, ¹⁰⁰Mo(⁶⁴Ni, X), E(cm)=120-160 MeV; calculated fusion σ, average angular momenta. Effective fusion barrier model. Comparison with data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.57.1853
Citations: PlumX Metrics

1997SA63      Z.Phys. A359, 407 (1997)

B.Sahu, C.S.Shastry

Roles of Survival Probability and Barrier Reduction in Heavy Ion Fusion Induced by Break Up

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁹Si(⁹Be, X), E(cm)=10-30 MeV; ¹⁵⁰Sm(¹¹Li, X), E(cm)=15-25 MeV; calculated fusion σ; deduced neutron separation energy dependence, breakup process role. Effective fusion barrier transmission model.

doi: 10.1007/s002180050421
Citations: PlumX Metrics

1996SA29      J.Phys.(London) G22, 1483 (1996)

B.Sahu, C.S.Shastry

Cross Section, Spin Distribution and Mean Spin Analysis of Low-Energy Heavy-Ion Fusion by Closed Formulae

doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/22/10/011
Citations: PlumX Metrics

1994SU14      J.Phys.(London) G20, 1243 (1994)

P.Susan, B.Sahu, B.M.Jyrwa, C.S.Shastry

Pocket and Barrier Resonances in Potenital Scattering and Their Application to Heavy-Ion Reactions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁶O(¹⁶O, X), E not given; analyzed resonance data. Barrier region resonance model.

doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/20/8/015
Citations: PlumX Metrics

1991SA29      Phys.Rev. C44, 2729 (1991)

B.Sahu, B.M.Jyrwa, P.Susan, C.S.Shastry

Barrier Region Resonance Model for Heavy Ion Resonances

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹²C(¹²C, ¹²C), (¹⁶O, ¹⁶O), E not given; calculated resonances energy vs resonance number; deduced nucleus-nucleus potential barrier, effective potential relationship. S-matrix approach.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.44.2729
Citations: PlumX Metrics

1990ME02      Phys.Rev. C41, 1031 (1990)

V.J.Menon, S.N.Mukherjee, C.S.Shastry, B.Sahu

Analytically Soluble Model for Fusion Time

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹²⁴Sn(⁵⁸Ni, X), E=168.25-202.84 MeV; ⁹⁰Zr(⁸¹Br, X), ¹²²Sn(⁴⁰Ar, X), ⁶⁴Ni(⁵⁸Ni, X), E not given; calculated fusion time vs energy. Analytical model.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.41.1031
Citations: PlumX Metrics

1990SA03      J.Phys.(London) G16, 55 (1990)

B.Sahu, C.S.Shastry

Effective Fusion Barrier Transmission Model for Fusion at Higher Energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁴⁰Ca(¹⁶O, X), E(cm) ≈ 30-100 MeV; ²⁷Al(¹⁶O, X), E ≈ 13-100 MeV; calculated fusion σ(E). Effective fusion barrier transmission model.

doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/16/1/009
Citations: PlumX Metrics

1989SA16      J.Phys.(London) G15, L149 (1989)

B.Sahu, C.S.Shastry

Effective Fusion Barrier Transmission Model for Heavy-Ion Fusion

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^148,154Sm(¹⁶O, X), E=53-65 MeV; ²⁰⁸Pb(¹⁶O, X), E=70-95 MeV; ¹²²Sn(⁴⁰Ar, X), E=97-119 MeV; ⁴⁰Ca(⁴⁰Ca, X), 48-68 MeV; ⁴⁴Ca(⁴⁰Ca, X), E=48-66 MeV; ⁵⁸Ni(⁵⁸Ni, X), E=92-109 MeV; ⁶⁴Ni(⁵⁸Ni, X), E=89-113 MeV; ¹²⁴Sn(⁵⁸Ni, X), E=156-199 MeV; ⁹⁰Zr(⁸¹Br, X), E=148-178 MeV; ⁹⁶Mo(⁸¹Br, X), E=155-181 MeV; ¹⁰⁴Ru(⁸¹Br, X), E=160-184 MeV; calculated fusion σ(E). Effective fusion barrier transmission model.

doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/15/8/002
Citations: PlumX Metrics

1988SA25      Phys.Rev. C38, 1262 (1988)

B.Sahu, C.S.Shastry

Estimation of Fusion Time in Heavy-Ion Collisions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰⁸Pb, ¹⁴⁸Sm(¹⁶O, X), ¹²²Sn(⁴⁰Ar, X), ⁴⁰Ca(⁴⁰Ca, X), ¹²⁴Sn, ^58,64Ni(⁵⁸Ni, X), ¹¹⁸Sn(⁶⁴Ni, X), ⁹⁰Zr(⁸¹Br, X), E not given; calculated fusion time. Classical Coulomb, Coulomb-nuclear trajectories.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.38.1262
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Note: The following list of authors and aliases matches the search parameter B.Sahu: , B.B.SAHU, B.C.SAHU, B.K.SAHU