NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 29, 2024. Search: Author = C.S.Shastry Found 35 matches. 2010PR10 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E19, 2033 (2010) P.Prema, S.Mahadevan, C.S.Shastry, Y.K.Gambhir S-matrix-based unified calculation of Q-values and half-lives of α-decay of super heavy elements RADIOACTIVITY 271Sg, 262,272Bh, 267,269Hs, 266,275,276Mt, 273Ds, 279,280Rg, 283Cn, 284Nh, 285,286,287,288,289Fl, 290,291,292Lv, 294Og(α); calculated Q-values, T1/2. RMF theory, S-matrix method.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301310016491
2008PR06 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E17, 611 (2008) P.Prema, S.Mahadevan, C.S.Shastry, A.Bhagwat, Y.K.Gambhir Study of alpha decay of super heavy elements using S-matrix and WKB methods
doi: 10.1142/S0218301308010039
2008SA06 Phys.Rev. C 77, 024604 (2008) B.Sahu, G.S.Mallick, B.B.Sahu, S.K.Agarwalla, C.S.Shastry Unified description of scattering and fusion phenomena in heavy-ion collisions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(12C, X), E(cm)=50-110 MeV; 208Pb(16O, X), E=55-95 MeV; calculated scattering and fusion cross sections.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.77.024604
2006AG01 J.Phys.(London) G32, 165 (2006) S.K.Agarwalla, G.S.Mallik, P.Prema, S.Mahadevan, B.Sahu, C.S.Shastry Analysis of 16O + 28Si elastic scattering in the laboratory energy range 50.0 MeV to 142.5 MeV NUCLEAR REACTIONS 28Si(16O, 16O), E=50.0-142.5 MeV; analyzed σ(θ); deduced enhanced back-angle oscillations. Phenomenological potential, comparison with Woods-Saxon approach.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/32/2/008
2006MA33 Phys.Rev. C 73, 054606 (2006) G.S.Mallick, S.K.Agarwalla, B.Sahu, C.S.Shastry Analysis of elastic scattering of 16O+28Si and 12C+24Mg by a new optical potential NUCLEAR REACTIONS 28Si(16O, 16O), E(cm)=18.7-90.7 MeV; 24Mg(12C, 12C), E(cm)=10.7-16.0 MeV; calculated σ(θ). Phenomenological optical potential, comparison with data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.73.054606
2006MA78 Phys.Rev. C 74, 057601 (2006) S.Mahadevan, P.Prema, C.S.Shastry, Y.K.Gambhir Comparison of S-matrix and WKB methods for half-width calculations RADIOACTIVITY 253Fm, 257No, 261Rf, 265Sg, 269Hs, 273Ds(α); calculated Qα, T1/2. S-matrix and WKB methods compared with data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.74.057601
2003SA01 Nucl.Phys. A713, 45 (2003) B.Sahu, S.K.Agarwalla, C.S.Shastry Fusion barrier distribution described by above-barrier resonances NUCLEAR REACTIONS 144Sm, 208Pb(16O, X), E(cm) ≈ 54-92 MeV; calculated fusion σ, barrier distributions, above-barrier resonance contributions. Comparisons with data.
doi: 10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01289-7
2003SA39 Pramana 61, 51 (2003) B.Sahu, S.K.Agarwalla, C.S.Shastry Fusion, resonances and scattering in 12C + 12C reaction NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C(12C, X), E(cm)=7-35 MeV; calculated fusion σ, resonance features. 12C(12C, X), E(cm)=2-7 MeV; calculated astrophysical S-factors. 12C(12C, 12C), E(cm)=6, 7, 8, 9 MeV; calculated elastic σ(θ). Optical model potential, comparisons with data.
doi: 10.1007/BF02704510
1999SA41 J.Phys.(London) G25, 1909 (1999) Asymmetric Parabolic Effective Barrier Model for Heavy Ion Fusion and Its Relation to Coupled Channel Effects NUCLEAR REACTIONS 144,152Sm(16O, X), E(cm)=50-75 MeV; 46,48,50Ti(40Ca, X), E(cm)=50-85 MeV; 64Ni(58Ni, X), E(cm)=90-115 MeV; 92Zr(64Ni, X), E(cm)=120-150 MeV; calculated fusion σ, spin distributions, barrier distributions. Asymmetric parabolic effective barrier model. Comparisons with data.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/25/9/310
1999SA63 Pramana 53, 545 (1999) Asymmetric Barrier Model for Heavy Ion Fusion and Its Relation to Channel Coupling NUCLEAR REACTIONS 46,48,50Ti(40Ca, X), E=100-150 MeV; analyzed fusion σ, barrier distributions. Asymmetric parabolic effective barrier.
doi: 10.1007/s12043-999-0028-5
1998JA02 Phys.Rev. C57, 1000 (1998) I.Jamir, E.F.P.Lyngdoh, C.S.Shastry α-Nucleus Scattering in Angular Momentum Space NUCLEAR REACTIONS 40Ca(α, α), E=29 MeV; analyzed data; deduced anomalous large angle scattering mechanism.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.57.1000
1998JA11 Pramana 50, 271 (1998) I.Jamir, E.F.P.Lyngdoh, C.S.Shastry Correlation between Zeroes and Poles of S Matrix for Complex Potentials
doi: 10.1007/BF02845549
1998SA13 Phys.Rev. C57, 1853 (1998) B.Sahu, I.Jamir, E.F.P.Lyngdoh, C.S.Shastry Fusion Under a Complex Barrier NUCLEAR REACTIONS 152,154Sm(16O, X), E(cm)=53-73 MeV; 58,64Ni(64Ni, X), 58Ni(58Ni, X), E(cm)=90-110 MeV; 92Zr, 100Mo(64Ni, X), E(cm)=120-160 MeV; calculated fusion σ, average angular momenta. Effective fusion barrier model. Comparison with data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.57.1853
1997JA07 Pramana 48, 825 (1997) I.Jamir, E.F.P.Lyngdoh, C.S.Shastry Algebraic Expressions for Effective Potential Characteristic Parameters in Heavy Ion Scattering NUCLEAR REACTIONS 148,152,154Sm, 208Pb, 144Nd(16O, 16O), 58,62Ni(32S, 32S), 123Sb(37Cl, 37Cl), 122Sn(40Ar, 40Ar), 40,44Ca(40Ca, 40Ca), 18O, 58,64Ni, 124Sn(58Ni, 58Ni), 96Zr, 118Sn(64Ni, 64Ni), 80Se(80Se, 80Se), 90,94Zr, 94Mo, 104Ru(81Br, 81Br), E not given; calculated barrier, pocket position, l(poc), effective potential parameter characteristics. Algebraic expressions, optical model, Woods-Saxon form factors.
doi: 10.1007/BF02845616
1997SA63 Z.Phys. A359, 407 (1997) Roles of Survival Probability and Barrier Reduction in Heavy Ion Fusion Induced by Break Up NUCLEAR REACTIONS 29Si(9Be, X), E(cm)=10-30 MeV; 150Sm(11Li, X), E(cm)=15-25 MeV; calculated fusion σ; deduced neutron separation energy dependence, breakup process role. Effective fusion barrier transmission model.
doi: 10.1007/s002180050421
1996SA29 J.Phys.(London) G22, 1483 (1996) Cross Section, Spin Distribution and Mean Spin Analysis of Low-Energy Heavy-Ion Fusion by Closed Formulae
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/22/10/011
1994SU14 J.Phys.(London) G20, 1243 (1994) P.Susan, B.Sahu, B.M.Jyrwa, C.S.Shastry Pocket and Barrier Resonances in Potenital Scattering and Their Application to Heavy-Ion Reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 16O(16O, X), E not given; analyzed resonance data. Barrier region resonance model.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/20/8/015
1994SU20 Phys.Rev. C50, 2955 (1994) P.Susan, C.S.Shastry, Y.K.Gambhir Salient Features of Scattering Amplitudes in Intermediate Energy Nucleon-Nucleus Scattering NUCLEAR REACTIONS 40Ca(p, p), E=181, 362 MeV; calculated phase shift vs l; deduced regionwise contribution to reaction σ. Potential scattering framework.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.50.2955
1991DE03 Nuovo Cim. 104A, 139 (1991) Closed-Formalism Approach to Antiproton-Nucleus Scattering NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C(p-bar, p-bar), E=46.8, 180 MeV; 208Pb, 40Ca(p-bar, p-bar), E=46.8 MeV; analyzed σ(θ). Parametrized S-matrix approach.
doi: 10.1007/BF02910871
1991SA29 Phys.Rev. C44, 2729 (1991) B.Sahu, B.M.Jyrwa, P.Susan, C.S.Shastry Barrier Region Resonance Model for Heavy Ion Resonances NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C(12C, 12C), (16O, 16O), E not given; calculated resonances energy vs resonance number; deduced nucleus-nucleus potential barrier, effective potential relationship. S-matrix approach.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.44.2729
1990ME02 Phys.Rev. C41, 1031 (1990) V.J.Menon, S.N.Mukherjee, C.S.Shastry, B.Sahu Analytically Soluble Model for Fusion Time NUCLEAR REACTIONS 124Sn(58Ni, X), E=168.25-202.84 MeV; 90Zr(81Br, X), 122Sn(40Ar, X), 64Ni(58Ni, X), E not given; calculated fusion time vs energy. Analytical model.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.41.1031
1990SA03 J.Phys.(London) G16, 55 (1990) Effective Fusion Barrier Transmission Model for Fusion at Higher Energies NUCLEAR REACTIONS 40Ca(16O, X), E(cm) ≈ 30-100 MeV; 27Al(16O, X), E ≈ 13-100 MeV; calculated fusion σ(E). Effective fusion barrier transmission model.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/16/1/009
1989SA16 J.Phys.(London) G15, L149 (1989) Effective Fusion Barrier Transmission Model for Heavy-Ion Fusion NUCLEAR REACTIONS 148,154Sm(16O, X), E=53-65 MeV; 208Pb(16O, X), E=70-95 MeV; 122Sn(40Ar, X), E=97-119 MeV; 40Ca(40Ca, X), 48-68 MeV; 44Ca(40Ca, X), E=48-66 MeV; 58Ni(58Ni, X), E=92-109 MeV; 64Ni(58Ni, X), E=89-113 MeV; 124Sn(58Ni, X), E=156-199 MeV; 90Zr(81Br, X), E=148-178 MeV; 96Mo(81Br, X), E=155-181 MeV; 104Ru(81Br, X), E=160-184 MeV; calculated fusion σ(E). Effective fusion barrier transmission model.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/15/8/002
1988DE40 Pramana 31, 173 (1988) Semi-Classical Approach to Antiproton-Nucleus Scattering NUCLEAR REACTIONS 58Ni(18O, 18O), E=60 MeV; 12C, 40Ca(p-bar, p-bar), E=46.8 MeV; calculated effective potential parameters, σ(θ).
doi: 10.1007/BF02848804
1988SA25 Phys.Rev. C38, 1262 (1988) Estimation of Fusion Time in Heavy-Ion Collisions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb, 148Sm(16O, X), 122Sn(40Ar, X), 40Ca(40Ca, X), 124Sn, 58,64Ni(58Ni, X), 118Sn(64Ni, X), 90Zr(81Br, X), E not given; calculated fusion time. Classical Coulomb, Coulomb-nuclear trajectories.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.38.1262
1984GA28 Phys.Rev. C30, 1343 (1984) Closed Form S Matrix in Terms of Matter Distributions and Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction for Heavy Ion Scattering NUCLEAR REACTIONS 58Ni(18O, 18O), E=60 MeV; calculated phase shifts, reflection function. Analytic S-matrix approach, folding model nucleon-nucleon interaction.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.30.1343
1984PA06 Phys.Rev. C29, 1552 (1984) I.Parija, R.K.Satpathy, C.S.Shastry Orbiting Mechanism in α - 40Ca Scattering NUCLEAR REACTIONS 40Ca(α, α), E=27-54 MeV; calculated σ(θ). Orbiting phenomena, anomalous large angle scattering.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.29.1552
1984SH36 Pramana 23, 175 (1984) Regionwise Absorption in Nuclear Optical Model NUCLEAR REACTIONS 209Bi(n, n), E=7, 14.6 MeV; 60Ni(p, p), E=5.25, 6.8 MeV; 27Al(α, α), E=28 MeV; 12C(6Li, 6Li), E=5.8, 59.8 MeV; 58Ni(18O, 18O), E=60 MeV; calculated reaction σ. Regionwise absorption, optical model.
1983SH08 Phys.Rev. C27, 2042 (1983) Orbiting Phenomenon in 16O-28Si Scattering NUCLEAR REACTIONS 28Si(16O, 16O), E=55 MeV; analyzed σ(θ), effective potentials; deduced orbiting phenomena.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.27.2042
1983SH24 Phys.Rev. C28, 1109 (1983) Sensitivity of Phase Shifts to the Optical Potentials in Heavy Ion Scattering NUCLEAR REACTIONS 58Ni(18O, 18O), E=60 MeV; 27Al(α, α), E=28 MeV; 12C(6Li, 6Li), E=5.8, 59.8 MeV; analyzed optical potential characteristics; deduced Coulomb potential, colliding nuclear masses, sizes role in potential ambitguities. S-matrix approach.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.28.1109
1982SH18 J.Phys.(London) G8, 1431 (1982) Investigations in Closed Formalism and the Optical Model in Heavy-Ion Scattering NUCLEAR REACTIONS 62Ni(18O, 18O), E=63 MeV; calculated reflection function vs (L). 58Ni(16O, 16O), E=60 MeV; calculated phase shifts vs (L). Optical model, closed form expressions.
doi: 10.1088/0305-4616/8/10/013
1979JA08 Phys.Rev. C19, 848 (1979) Optical Potential for Nucleus-Nucleus Systems NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C(12C, 12C), E=102.1 MeV; calculated σ(θ). Double-folding model, realistic electrostatic potentials.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.19.848
1977GU04 Phys.Rev. C15, 1244 (1977); Erratum Phys.Rev. C16, 2458 (1977) R-Matrix Analysis of Neutron Scattering from 6Li NUCLEAR REACTIONS 6Li(n, n), (n, X), E=0-5 MeV; calculated total σ(E), polarization.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.15.1244
1975JA14 Phys.Rev. C12, 801 (1975) A.K.Jain, M.C.Gupta, C.S.Shastry Electrostatic Potentials for Nucleus-Nucleus Optical Model NUCLEAR REACTIONS 6,7Li, 16O, 40Ca, 197Au(p, p); calculated charge distribution parameters.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.12.801
1975MA50 Indian J.Pure Appl.Phys. 13, 169 (1975) Realistic Nuclear Charge Distribution and the Proton Optical Potential NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C, 16O, 40Ca, 58Ni, 197Au, 209Bi(p, p); calculated charge distribution, optical potential.
Back to query form Note: The following list of authors and aliases matches the search parameter C.S.Shastry: C.S.SASTRY, C.S.SHASTRY |