NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = B.K.Sharma Found 20 matches. 2024TH01 Phys.Rev. C 109, 025805 (2024) P.Thakur, B.K.Sharma, A.Ashika, S.Srivishnu, T.K.Jha Influence of the symmetry energy and σ-cut potential on the properties of pure nucleonic and hyperon-rich neutron star matter
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.109.025805
2023JE03 Acta Phys.Pol. A143, 4-A1 (2023) K.K.Jena, B.Sahu, J.K.Nayak, P.R.Preethi, B.K.Sharma, S.K.Agarwalla Simultaneous Study of Scattering and Fusion Hindrance Near Coulomb Barrier in F+Pb Systems NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(19F, 19F), (19F, X), E(cm)=80.6-94 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced energy-dependent parameters of the optical potential, fusion σ. The paradigm of the Ginocchio potential.
doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.54.4-A1
2022PA35 Phys.Rev. C 106, 055806 (2022) N.K.Patra, B.K.Sharma, A.Reghunath, A.K.H.Das, T.K.Jha Effect of the σ-cut potential on the properties of neutron stars with or without a hyperonic core
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.055806
2020SH23 Nucl.Phys. A1002, 121974 (2020) B.K.Sharma, S.Sathees, M.K.Meghaa, T.K.Jha Effect of Λμ coupling on liquid gas phase transition in warm asymmetric nuclear matter
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121974
2010CE01 J.Phys.(London) G37, 075107 (2010) M.Centelles, S.K.Patra, X.Roca-Maza, B.K.Sharma, P.D.Stevenson, X.Vinas The influence of the symmetry energy on the giant monopole resonance of neutron-rich nuclei analyzed in Thomas-Fermi theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 90Zr, 208,266Pb; calculated neutron skin thickness, energy per particle, giant monopole resonance. Relativistic extended Thomas-Fermi method.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/37/7/075107
2010SH11 Phys.Rev. C 81, 064304 (2010) Nuclear symmetry energy effects on liquid-gas phase transition in hot asymmetric nuclear matter
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.064304
2010SH29 Phys.Rev. C 82, 055802 (2010) Role of isospin physics in supernova matter and neutron stars
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.055802
2008GU20 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E17, 2244 (2008) R.K.Gupta, S.K.Arun, D.Singh, R.Kumar, Niyti, SK.Patra, P.Arumugam, B.K.Sharma Clusters in light, heavy, super-heavy and super-superheavy nuclei
doi: 10.1142/S0218301308011422
2007PA30 J.Phys.(London) G34, 2073 (2007) S.K.Patra, R.K.Gupta, B.K.Sharma, P.D.Stevenson, W.Greiner Exotic clustering in heavy and superheavy nuclei within the relativistic and non-relativistic mean field formalisms NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 222Ra, 232U, 236Pu, 242Cm; Z=114; calculated binding energies, deformation parameters, and rms charge radii within the relativistic mean field approach and the non-relativistic Skyrme-Hartree-Fock formalism.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/34/9/016
2007SH13 Phys.Rev. C 75, 035808 (2007) B.K.Sharma, P.K.Panda, S.K.Patra Phase transition and properties of a compact star
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.75.035808
2007SH33 Phys.Rev. C 76, 034601 (2007) A.Shukla, B.K.Sharma, R.Chandra, P.Arumugam, S.K.Patra Nuclear reaction studies of unstable nuclei using relativistic mean field formalisms in conjunction with the Glauber model NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C(12C, X), E < 1000 MeV/nucleon; 12C(Li, X), (Be, X), (B, X)E=800 MeV/nucleon; 12C(11Li, X), (14Be, X), (11Be, X), E=30, 85 MeV/nucleon; calculated σ, angular distributions and total reaction cross sections within the Glauber model. Compared results to available data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.76.034601
2006ME12 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E15, 1149 (2006) M.S.Mehta, B.K.Sharma, S.K.Patra, R.K.Gupta, W.Greiner Decrease of the spin-orbit interaction in drip-line nuclei, using relativistic mean field models NUCLEAR STRUCTURE F, Mg, Sb, Pb, Bi; calculated spin-orbit splitting energy vs neutron excess. 120,130,140,150,160,170,180,190Nd; calculated radial dependence of spin-orbit potential.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301306004740
2006SH01 J.Phys.(London) G32, L1 (2006) B.K.Sharma, P.Arumugam, S.K.Patra, P.D.Stevenson, R.K.Gupta, W.Greiner Clustering in superheavy nuclei within the relativistic mean field approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 292,296,300,304120; calculated binding energies, deformation parameters, radii, matter density distributions; deduced cluster configurations. Relativistic mean field approach.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/32/1/L01
2006SH20 J.Phys.(London) G32, 2089 (2006) B.K.Sharma, S.K.Patra, R.K.Gupta, A.Shukla, P.Arumugam, P.D.Stevenson, W.Greiner Reaction cross-sections for light nuclei on 12C using relativistic mean field formalism NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C(8B, X), (9B, X), (10B, X), (11B, X), (12B, X), (13B, X), (14B, X), (15B, X), (16B, X), (17B, X), (18B, X), (19B, X), (7Be, X), (8Be, X), (9Be, X), (10Be, X), (11Be, X), (12Be, X), (13Be, X), (14Be, X), (6Li, X), (7Li, X), (8Li, X), (9Li, X), (10Li, X), (11Li, X), E ≈ 800 MeV/nucleon; calculated reaction σ. Relativistic mean field approach. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 6,7,8,9,10,11Li, 10,11,12,13,14Be, 15,16,17B; calculated binding energies, deformation. Relativistic mean field approach.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/32/11/004
2005AR12 Phys.Rev. C 71, 064308 (2005) P.Arumugam, B.K.Sharma, S.K.Patra, R.J.K.Gupta Relativistic mean field study of clustering in light nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 16O, 32S; calculated binding energies, rms radii, matter density distributions, deformation parameters. 6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14Be, 11,13,15,17,19B; calculated binding energies, deformation parameters, neutron and proton density distributions. 12C, 20Ne, 24Mg, 28Si; calculated binding energies, matter density distributions, deformation parameters. Comparison with data, relativistic mean field approach.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.71.064308
2004AR23 Phys.Lett. B 601, 51 (2004) P.Arumugam, B.K.Sharma, P.K.Sahu, S.K.Patra, T.Sil, M.Centelles, X.Vinas Versatility of field theory motivated nuclear effective Lagrangian approach
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.09.026
2004NA22 Pramana 62, 827 (2004) Z.Naik, B.K.Sharma, T.K.Jha, P.Arumugam, S.K.Patra Shape change in Hf, W and Os-isotopes: A non-relativistic Hartree-Fock versus relativistic Hartree approximation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Hf, W, Os; calculated binding energies, quadrupole deformation parameters. Comparison of relativistic and nonrelativistic approaches.
doi: 10.1007/BF02706132
2004SH43 Phys.Rev. C 70, 044606 (2004) M.K.Sharma, Unnati, B.K.Sharma, B.P.Singh, H.D.Bhardwaj, R.Kumar, K.S.Golda, R.Prasad Complete and incomplete fusion reactions in the 16O + 169Tm system: Excitation functions and recoil range distributions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 169Tm(16O, 3n), (16O, 4n), (16O, 2np), (16O, 3np), (16O, 2n2p), (16O, 3nα), (16O, np2α), (16O, nα), E=71-95 MeV; measured excitation functions, recoil range distributions. Activation technique, comparison with model predictions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.70.044606
2004SI13 Phys.Rev. C 69, 044315 (2004) T.Sil, S.K.Patra, B.K.Sharma, M.Centelles, X.Vinas Superheavy nuclei in a relativistic effective Lagrangian model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=120; calculated two-neutron separation energies, pair gaps vs neutron number. Z=100-140; calculated two-proton separation energies, pair gaps for N=172, 184, 258 isotones. 298Fl, 292,304,378120; calculated single-particle level energies. Relativistic effective Lagrangian model, possible shell effects discussed.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.69.044315
1993SH26 Pramana 40, 399 (1993) B.K.Sharma, B.L.Ahuja, H.Singh, F.M.Mohammad Compton Profile of Molybdenum ATOMIC PHYSICS Mo(γ, γ), E=59.54 keV; measured Compton profile. Polycrystalline molybdenum.
doi: 10.1007/BF02847500
Back to query form |