ADOPTED LEVELS, GAMMAS for 170Ir

Authors: C.M. Baglin, E.A. Mccutchan, S. Basunia{+1 |  Citation: Nucl. Data Sheets 153, 1 (2018) |  Cutoff date: 1-Oct-2018 

 Full ENSDF file | Adopted Levels (PDF version) 


Q(β-)=-7060 keV SYS(n)= 9340 keV SYS(p)= -74 keV SYQ(α)= 6110 keV SY
Reference: 2017WA10

References:
  A  174Au α decay (162.9 MS)  B  174Au α decay (139 MS)
  C  112Sn(60Ni,pnγ) 

General Comments:

Levels: For calculated α decay branching ratios see 2017Zh03, 2016Sa16.

Q-value: ΔQ(β-)=ΔS(n)=ΔS(p)=90; ΔQ(α)=50 (2017Wa10).

Q-value: S(2n)=20836 (syst) 104; s(2p)=2143 (syst) 94; Q(εp)=7760 (syst) 90 (2017Wa10).










E(level)
(keV)
XREFJπ(level) T1/2(level)E(γ)
(keV)
I(γ)M(γ)Final Levels
     0.0A   (3-) 0.87 s +18-12 
% α = 5.2 17
% ε = 94.8 17
     
   0+X BC (8+) 811 ms 18 
% α = 38 5
% IT ≤ 62 5
% ε ≤ 62 5
     
   152.5+X 2  BC (9+)     152.5 2 
   100
(M1)
   0+X
(8+)
   190.56+X 24  BC (7-,8-,9-)     190.7 4 
   100
(E1)
   0+X
(8+)
   370.19+X 10   C (-)     218.4 2 
  370.1 1 
    82 9 
  ≈100


   152.5+X
   0+X
(9+)
(8+)
   501.69+X 23   C (9-)     131.5 2 
   100
[M1,E2]
   370.19+X
(-)
   768.91+X 24   C (10-)     267.3 1 
   100
[M1]
   501.69+X
(9-)
  1041.52+X 25   C (11-)     272.7 1 
  539.5 2 
   100 9 
    24 8 


   768.91+X
   501.69+X
(10-)
(9-)
  1382.5+X 3   C (12-)     340.9 2 
  613.6 8 
   100 14 
    42 14 


  1041.52+X
   768.91+X
(11-)
(10-)
  1717.3+X 4   C (13-)     335.0 2 
  675.9 3 
  ≈100
    72 24 


  1382.5+X
  1041.52+X
(12-)
(11-)
  2087.4+X 4   C (14-)     370.1 1 
  704.5 3 
  ≈100
    54 23 


  1717.3+X
  1382.5+X
(13-)
(12-)

E(level): From least-squares fit to measured Eγ.

Jπ(level): Values given without further comment are from 2007Ha45 in 112Sn(60Ni,pnγ) and are based on the authors’ deduced band structure and total Routhian surface calculations.

Back to top

Band Transitions:

E(level)
(keV)
Jπ(level) T1/2(level)E(γ)I(γ)M(γ)Final Levels
Band 1 - Possible (π 11/2[505])+(ν 1/2[660]) α=0 band.
   768.91+X 24  (10-)        
  1382.5+X 3  (12-)        
  2087.4+X 4  (14-)     370.1 1 
  704.5 3 
  ≈100
    54 23 


  1717.3+X
  1382.5+X
(13-)
(12-)
E(level)
(keV)
Jπ(level) T1/2(level)E(γ)I(γ)M(γ)Final Levels
Band 2 - Possible (π 11/2[505])+(ν 1/2[660]) α=1 band.
   501.69+X 23  (9-)        
  1041.52+X 25  (11-)        
  1717.3+X 4  (13-)     335.0 2 
  675.9 3 
  ≈100
    72 24 


  1382.5+X
  1041.52+X
(12-)
(11-)

Back to top

Additional Gamma Data:













E(level)
(keV)
Jπ(level)T1/2(level)E(γ)
(keV)
MultipolarityConversion
Coefficient
Additional Data
   152.5+X (9+)     152.5 2 (M1)1.84α=1.84
   190.56+X (7-,8-,9-)     190.7 4 (E1)0.0769α=0.0769 12
   501.69+X (9-)     131.5 2 [M1,E2]2.2α=2.2 7
   768.91+X (10-)     267.3 1 [M1]0.385α=0.385

Back to top

Additional Level Data and Comments:

E(level)Jπ(level)T1/2(level)Comments
     0.0(3-) 0.87 s +18-12 
% α = 5.2 17
% ε = 94.8 17
E(level): Total routhian surface calculations (2007Ha45) indicate a γ-soft nucleus with β2≈0.15 and γ≈15|’ for the energetically most favored orbitals, namely, 11/2[505] (1h11/2), 3/2[420] (2d3/2) or 1/2[400] (3s1/2) for the 77th proton coupled to 3/2[521], 5/2[512], 7/2[514] (1h9/2) or 5/2[523] (2f7/2) or 1/2[660] (1i13/2) for the 93rd neutron. The isotopes 169Ir and 171Ir exhibit 1/2+ ground states and 11/2- isomers; the isotone 169Os has a possible 5/2- ground state based on its unhindered α decay to a probable 5/2[523] g.s. in 165W. If the Gallagher-Moszkowski rule is valid at this deformation, coupling a 1/2+ or 11/2- proton with a 5/2- neutron would result in low-lying 3- and 8+ levels, consistent with Jπ proposed by 2004GoZZ. However, these Jπ assignments must be considered highly tentative.
Jπ(level): Total routhian surface calculations (2007Ha45) indicate a γ-soft nucleus with β2≈0.15 and γ≈15|’ for the energetically most favored orbitals, namely, 11/2[505] (1h11/2), 3/2[420] (2d3/2) or 1/2[400] (3s1/2) for the 77th proton coupled to 3/2[521], 5/2[512], 7/2[514] (1h9/2) or 5/2[523] (2f7/2) or 1/2[660] (1i13/2) for the 93rd neutron. The isotopes 169Ir and 171Ir exhibit 1/2+ ground states and 11/2- isomers; the isotone 169Os has a possible 5/2- ground state based on its unhindered α decay to a probable 5/2[523] g.s. in 165W. If the Gallagher-Moszkowski rule is valid at this deformation, coupling a 1/2+ or 11/2- proton with a 5/2- neutron would result in low-lying 3- and 8+ levels, consistent with Jπ proposed by 2004GoZZ. However, these Jπ assignments must be considered highly tentative.
   0+X(8+) 811 ms 18 
% α = 38 5
% IT ≤ 62 5
% ε ≤ 62 5
E(level): Total routhian surface calculations (2007Ha45) indicate a γ-soft nucleus with β2≈0.15 and γ≈15|’ for the energetically most favored orbitals, namely, 11/2[505] (1h11/2), 3/2[420] (2d3/2) or 1/2[400] (3s1/2) for the 77th proton coupled to 3/2[521], 5/2[512], 7/2[514] (1h9/2) or 5/2[523] (2f7/2) or 1/2[660] (1i13/2) for the 93rd neutron. The isotopes 169Ir and 171Ir exhibit 1/2+ ground states and 11/2- isomers; the isotone 169Os has a possible 5/2- ground state based on its unhindered α decay to a probable 5/2[523] g.s. in 165W. If the Gallagher-Moszkowski rule is valid at this deformation, coupling a 1/2+ or 11/2- proton with a 5/2- neutron would result in low-lying 3- and 8+ levels, consistent with Jπ proposed by 2004GoZZ. However, these Jπ assignments must be considered highly tentative.
Jπ(level): Total routhian surface calculations (2007Ha45) indicate a γ-soft nucleus with β2≈0.15 and γ≈15|’ for the energetically most favored orbitals, namely, 11/2[505] (1h11/2), 3/2[420] (2d3/2) or 1/2[400] (3s1/2) for the 77th proton coupled to 3/2[521], 5/2[512], 7/2[514] (1h9/2) or 5/2[523] (2f7/2) or 1/2[660] (1i13/2) for the 93rd neutron. The isotopes 169Ir and 171Ir exhibit 1/2+ ground states and 11/2- isomers; the isotone 169Os has a possible 5/2- ground state based on its unhindered α decay to a probable 5/2[523] g.s. in 165W. If the Gallagher-Moszkowski rule is valid at this deformation, coupling a 1/2+ or 11/2- proton with a 5/2- neutron would result in low-lying 3- and 8+ levels, consistent with Jπ proposed by 2004GoZZ. However, these Jπ assignments must be considered highly tentative.
   501.69+X(9-)   E(level): Possible (π 11/2[505])+(ν 1/2[660]) α=1 band.
   768.91+X(10-)   E(level): Possible (π 11/2[505])+(ν 1/2[660]) α=0 band.
  1041.52+X(11-)   E(level): Possible (π 11/2[505])+(ν 1/2[660]) α=1 band.
  1382.5+X(12-)   E(level): Possible (π 11/2[505])+(ν 1/2[660]) α=0 band.
  1717.3+X(13-)   E(level): Possible (π 11/2[505])+(ν 1/2[660]) α=1 band.
  2087.4+X(14-)   E(level): Possible (π 11/2[505])+(ν 1/2[660]) α=0 band.

Back to top

Additional Gamma Comments:

E(level)E(gamma)Comments
   152.5+X   152.5M(γ): based on strength of Ir K| x ray relative to I(153γ) in α-γ coin spectrum in 174Au α decay (811 ms) (2004GoZZ).
   190.56+X   190.7E(γ): weighted average of 190.3 4 from (60Ni,pnγ) and 190.2 5 from 174Au α decay (811 ms).
M(γ): based on absence of Ir K| x ray in α-γ coin spectrum in 174Au α decay (811 ms) (2004GoZZ).
   370.19+X   370.1E(γ): for doublet.. Multiply placed with intensity suitably divided
I(γ): Multiply placed with intensity suitably divided
   501.69+X   131.5M(γ): not E1 from intensity balance at the 502+x level (α(exp)>1.5 assuming intraband 267.3γ is M1) in (60Ni,pnγ).
  1717.3+X   335.0E(γ): for doublet; placement of other component unknown.
  2087.4+X   370.1E(γ): for doublet.. Multiply placed with intensity suitably divided
I(γ): Multiply placed with intensity suitably divided

Back to top