NSR Query Results


Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 11, 2024.

Search: Author = P.Sharma

Found 29 matches.

Back to query form



2024SA15      Eur.Phys.J. A 60, (2024)

G.Saxena, P.K.Sharma, P.Saxena

A global study of α-clusters decay in heavy and superheavy nuclei with half-life and preformation factor

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE N=100-180; calculated T1/2, preformation factor with microscopic structural information and cast in the form of quite precise empirical formulas.

doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01259-w
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2023DA19      Phys.Rev. C 108, 064304 (2023)

P.Das, U.Datta, S.Chakraborty, A.Rahaman, O.Tengblad, B.K.Agrawal, A.Becerril, J.Cederkall, J.Dey, A.Gottberg, S.M.Adil Imam, M.Kowalska, J.Kurcewicz, M.Lund, S.Mandal, M.Madurga, N.Marginean, R.Marginean, C.Mihai, I.Marroquin, E.Nacher, A.Negret, S.Pascu, A.Perea, E.Rapisarda, F.Rotaru, J.Ray, P.Sharma, T.Stora, C.Sotty, V.Vedia, N.Warr, R.Wadsworth

Exotic decay of 115Cs

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.064304
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.


2023JA02      Nucl.Phys. A1031, 122597 (2023)

A.Jain, P.K.Sharma, S.K.Jain, J.K.Deegwal, G.Saxena

Cluster radioactivity in trans-lead region: A systematic study with modified empirical formulas

RADIOACTIVITY 221Fr, 221,222,223Ra, 223Ac(14C), 223Ac(15N), 224Ra, 225Ac, 226Ra, 226Th(14C), 228Th(20O), 230Th(24Ne), 230U(22Ne), 231Pa(24Ne), 232Th(24Ne), (26Ne), 232U(24Ne), (28Mg), 233U(24Ne), (25Ne), (28Mg), 234U(24Ne), (26Ne), (28Mg), 235U(24Ne), (25Ne), (28Mg), (29Mg), 236U(24Ne), (26Ne), (28Mg), (30Mg), 236Pu(28Mg), 237Np(30Mg), 238Pu(28Mg), (30Mg), (32Si), 240Pu, 241Am, 242Cm(34Si), 216Rn(8Be), 222Fr(14B), 221Ra(13C), 223Ra(15C), 222Ac(14N), (15N), (16N), (17N), 224Th(16O), 225Th(17O), 226Th(18O), 227Th(19O), 228Th(20O), 229Th(21O), 230Th(22O), 231Th(23O), 228Pa(20F), 229Pa(21F), 231Pa(23F), 231U(23Ne), (25Ne); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122597
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2023SA02      J.Phys.(London) G50, 015102 (2023)

G.Saxena, M.Aggarwal, D.Singh, A.Jain, P.K.Sharma, H.L.Yadav

Deformation dependence of 2p-radioactivity half-lives: probe with a new formula across the mass region with Z < 82

RADIOACTIVITY 6Be, 12O, 16Ne, 19Mg, 45Fe, 48Ni, 54Zn, 67Kr, 10N, 28Cl, 32K, 52Cu, 57Ga, 60,62As(2p); analyzed available data; deduced T1/2 by employing our newly proposed semi-empirical formula wherein the nuclear deformation has been incorporated in a phenomenological way.

doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ac991d
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2022SH29      Phys.Scr. 97, 045307 (2022)

R.Sharma, A.Jain, P.K.Sharma, S.K.Jain, G.Saxena

A comprehensive study of decay modes associated with Pb isotopes

RADIOACTIVITY 176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,205Pb(β+), (EC), 209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266Pb(β-), 178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193Pb(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac607c
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2021JA09      Hyperfine Interactions 242, 60 (2021)

A.Jain, R.Sharma, S.K.Jain, P.K.Sharma, G.Saxena

Cluster radioactivity in 294, 296Og

RADIOACTIVITY 294,296Og(α), (8Be), (12C), (14C), (16O), (18O), (20O), (22Ne), (24Ne), (26Mg), (28Mg), (30Si), (32Si), (34Si), (36S), (38S), (40Ar), (42Ar), (44Ar), (46Ca), (48Ca), (50Ca), (52Ti), (54Ti), (56Cr), (58Cr), (60Cr), (62Fe), (64Fe), (66Ni), (68Ni), (70Ni), (72Zn), (74Ge), (76Zn), (78Ge), (80Ge), (82Ge), (84Se), (86Kr), (88Kr), (90Sr), (92Kr), (94Sr), (96Zr), (98Zr), (100Mo), (102Mo); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1007/s10751-021-01748-0
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2021SA30      J.Phys.(London) G48, 055103 (2021)

G.Saxena, P.K.Sharma, P.Saxena

Modified empirical formulas and machine learning for α-decay systematics

RADIOACTIVITY 276,278,280,282,284Cn, 284,285,286,287,288,289Fl, 290,292,294Lv, 294Og(α), (SF); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/abcd1c
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2021SA59      Phys.Scr. 96, 125304 (2021)

G.Saxena, A.Jain, P.K.Sharma

A new empirical formula for α-decay half-life and decay chains of Z = 120 isotopes

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=50-118; analyzed available data; deduced a new formula (QF) with only 4 coefficients as well as to modify the Tagepera-Nurmia formula with just 3 coefficients (MTNF) by employing nonlinear regressions.

RADIOACTIVITY 288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304120, 284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300Og, 280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296Lv, 276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292Fl, 272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288Cn, 268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284Ds, 264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280Hs, 260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276Sg(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac1a4d
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2021SH38      Nucl.Phys. A1016, 122318 (2021)

P.K.Sharma, A.Jain, G.Saxena

New modified empirical formulae for favoured and unfavoured α-decay

RADIOACTIVITY 305,319,321,331,337121, 294,295,296,298,299,300,301,302,304,306,308,310,311,312,314,316,317,318,320,322,324,326,328,330,331,332,334,336,338,339122, 321123, 300,302,304,306,308,310,312,313,314,316,318,319,320,322,324,326,328,330,332,333,334,336,338124, 291,293,295,297,299,301,303,305,307,309,311,313,315,317,319,321,323,325,327,329,331,333,335,337,339121, 307,309,311,313,315,317,319,321,323,325,327,329,331,333,335,337122, 297,299,301,303,305,307,309,311,313,315,317,319,321,323,325,327,329,331,333,335,337,339123, 301,303,305,307,309,311,313,315,317,319,321,323,325,327,329,331,333,335,337,339124(α); calculated T1/2; deduced formulae.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122318
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2021SI02      Nucl.Phys. A1006, 122066 (2021)

U.K.Singh, R.Sharma, P.K.Sharma, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, G.Saxena

Structural properties and α-decay chains of transfermium nuclei (101 ≤ Z ≤ 110)

RADIOACTIVITY 235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287Md, 238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288No, 241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289Lr, 243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290Rf, 245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291Db, 248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292Sg, 250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293Bh, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294Hs, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295Mt, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296Ds(α), (SF); calculated potential energy surfaces (PESs), occupancies of neutron single particle states, rms α-decay T1/2, T1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122066
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2020LA12      Phys.Rev. C 102, 034613 (2020)

P.V.Laveen, E.Prasad, N.Madhavan, A.K.Nasirov, J.Gehlot, S.Nath, G.Mandaglio, G.Giardina, A.M.Vinodkumar, M.Shareef, A.Shamlath, S.K.Duggi, P.Sandya Devi, T.Banerjee, M.M.Hosamani, Khushboo, P.Jisha, N.Kumar, P.Sharma, T.Varughese

Fusion studies in 35, 37Cl + 181Ta reactions via evaporation residue cross section measurements

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 181Ta(35Cl, X), (37Cl, X), E=169.7-236.6 MeV; measured evaporation residues (ERs) using HYbrid Recoil mass Analyzer (HYRA) and position sensitive multiwire proportional counter (MWPC) at the 15-UD Pelletron and superconducting linear accelerator (sc-LINAC) facility of IUAC-New Delhi; deduced σ(E), partial capture, fusion, fast fission and quasifission and total ER cross sections; calculated potential energy surface (PES) of populating 216Th compound nucleus as a function of the distance between the interacting nuclei and charge numbers (Z) of the fragments. Comparison with dinuclear system (DNS) model and statistical model calculations.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.034613
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6392.


2020SI27      Nucl.Phys. A1004, 122035 (2020)

U.K.Singh, P.K.Sharma, M.Kaushik, S.K.Jain, D.T.Akrawy, G.Saxena

Study of decay modes in transfermium isotopes

RADIOACTIVITY 245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260Md, 250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262No, 252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266Lr, 253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265Rf, 255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270Db, 258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271Sg, 260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274Bh, 263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277Hs, 266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278Mt(EC), (β-), (α), (SF); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122035
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2019KH06      Phys.Rev. C 100, 014910 (2019)

A.Khuntia, S.K.Tiwari, P.Sharma, R.Sahoo, T.K.Nayak

Effect of Hagedorn states on isothermal compressibility of hadronic matter formed in heavy-ion collisions: From NICA to LHC energies

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014910
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2018KA31      Acta Phys.Pol. B49, 651 (2018)

G.Kaur, B.R.Behera, A.Jhingan, R.Dubey, T.Banerjee, M.Thakur, R.Mahajan, P.Sharma, Khushboo, N.Saneesh, A.Yadav, K.Kapoor, N.Kumar, K.Rani, P.Sugathan, N.Rowley

Quasi-elastic Scattering in the 48Ti+232Th Reaction

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 232Th(48Ti, x), E=220-285 MeV; measured reaction products energy, intensity, angle, mainly projectile-like particles using hybrid telescope array; separated pure QuasiElastic (QE) events; deduced barrier distribution, σ(θ); calculated barrier distribution, σ(θ) using coupled channels with deformation, vibration and rotation.

doi: 10.5506/aphyspolb.49.651
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2018MA48      Acta Phys.Pol. B49, 645 (2018)

R.Mahajan, B.R.Behera, M.Thakur, G.Kaur, P.Sharma, K.Kapoor, P.Sugathan, A.Jhingan, A.Chatterjee, N.Saneesh, R.Dubey, A.Yadav, N.Kumar, H.Singh, A.Kumar, A.Saxena, S.Pal

Fission Dynamics of 192, 202, 206, 210Po Compound Nuclei by Neutron Multiplicity Measurements

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 144,154Sm(48Ti, x), E*=72 MeV; measured En, In; deduced neutron yields, double-differential yields, neutron pre and post multiplicities, pre and post temperatures of neutron sources; calculated neutron multiplicities, temperatures using compound nucleus statistical model with the strength of nuclear dissipation as a free parameter. Yields compared with 191Os(18O, x) and 194Pt(12C, x) reactions at 73.5 and 76.7 MeV, respectively, measured earlier; deduced no specific dependence on the (N-Z)/A of the fissioning nuclei, deduced importance of entrance channels.

doi: 10.5506/aphyspolb.49.645
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2018MA55      Phys.Rev. C 98, 034601 (2018)

R.Mahajan, B.R.Behera, M.Thakur, G.Kaur, P.Sharma, K.Kapoor, A.Kumar, P.Sugathan, A.Jhingan, A.Chatterjee, N.Saneesh, A.Yadav, R.Dubey, N.Kumar, H.Singh, A.Saxena, S.Pal

Systematic study of 192, 202, 206, 210Po compound nuclei using neutron multiplicity as a probe

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 144Sm(48Ti, X)192Po*, E=260 MeV; 154Sm(48Ti, X)202Po*, E=230 MeV; measured reaction products, time of flight, E(n), I(n), n(fragment)-coin, neutron multiplicity spectra using the NAND array for neutron detection at the 15 UD Pelletron+LINAC facility of IUAC-New Delhi; deduced compound nucleus pre- and post-scission neutron multiplicity and partial fusion σ. 194Pt(12C, X)206Po*, E*=76.7 MeV; 192Os(18O, X)210Po*, E*=73.5 MeV; analyzed compound nucleus pre-scission neutron multiplicity. Comparison with Shell model predictions for 192,202,206,210Po compound nuclei.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.034601
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2018TH03      Phys.Rev. C 98, 014606 (2018)

M.Thakur, B.R.Behera, R.Mahajan, G.Kaur, P.Sharma, K.Kapoor, K.Rani, P.Sugathan, A.Jhingan, N.Saneesh, R.Dubey, A.Yadav, A.Chatterjee, M.B.Chatterjee, N.Kumar, S.Mandal, S.K.Duggi, A.Saxena, S.Kailas, S.Pal

Measurement of mass-gated neutron multiplicity for the 48Ti + 208Pb reaction at 57.4 MeV excitation energy

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(48Ti, F)256Rf*, E=275 MeV; measured fission products, neutrons, (particle)n-coin, angular distributions, double differential neutron multiplicity spectra using position-sensitive multiwire proportional counters (MWPC) for particles and NAND array for neutrons at the 15UD Pelletron-LINAC facility of IUAC-New Delhi; deduced scatter plot of mass and total kinetic energy (TKE) of fission fragments, neutron multiplicity and temperature values, prescission neutron multiplicity. Quasifission (QF) processes investigated through analyses of angular distributions, mass distributions (MD), mass-energy distributions (MED), and mass-angle distributions (MAD) of the fission fragments. Comparison with statistical model calculations.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.014606
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2018TH04      Acta Phys.Pol. B49, 631 (2018)

M.Thakur, B.R.Behera, R.Mahajan, N.Saneesh, G.Kaur, P.Sharma, R.Dubey, K.Kapoor, A.Yadav, N.Kumar, S.Kumar, K.Rani, P.Sugathan, A.Jhingan, A.Chatterjee, M.B.Chatterjee, S.Mandal, A.Saxena, S.Pal, S.Kailas

Fission Dynamics Studies of Near Super-heavy Compound Nucleus 256Rf

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(48Ti, f), E*=57.4 MeV; measured neutron multiplicity; deduced neutron energy spectra corrected for efficiency of the neutron detectors calculated using statistical code FLUKA at a threshold of 120 keV, spectra come from compound nucleus (pre-scission), fission fragment F1 and the complementary fission fragment F2 (post-scission); calculated double-differential neutron multiplicity spectra and their mechanisms contribution at E=273.1 MeV; fitted to the data; calculated variation of neutron pre-scission multiplicity Mpren vs E*; deduced the value of τdelay=33 x 1021 from the fit to data of 232Th(19F, f) reaction.

doi: 10.5506/aphyspolb.49.631
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2017KA16      Acta Phys.Pol. B48, 619 (2017)

G.Kaur, B.R.Behera, A.Jhingan, R.Dubey, M.Thakur, P.Sharma, R.Mahajan, T.Banerjee, Khushboo, N.Saneesh, A.Kumar, S.Mandal, B.K.Nayak, A.Saxena, P.Sugathan, N.Rowley

Influence of Positive Q-value Neutron Transfer Coupling on Fusion Enhancement in 28Si+154Sm Reaction

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 154Sm(28Si, 30Si), E(eff)=85-115 MeV; calculated QE barrier distribution vs E(eff) using CCFULL code with vibrational and rotational couplings for the 2+1 state of 28Si, deformation before and after 2n transfer. Compared with data published by the same group and with calculations for other 28Si reactions.

doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.48.619
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2017KA58      Phys.Rev. C 96, 054605 (2017)

K.Kapoor, S.Verma, P.Sharma, R.Mahajan, N.Kaur, G.Kaur, B.R.Behera, K.P.Singh, A.Kumar, H.Singh, R.Dubey, N.Saneesh, A.Jhingan, P.Sugathan, G.Mohanto, B.K.Nayak, A.Saxena, H.P.Sharma, S.K.Chamoli, I.Mukul, V.Singh

Fission time scale from pre-scission neutron and α multiplicities in the 16O + 194Pt reaction

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 194Pt(16O, X)210Rn*, E=98.4 MeV; measured Eα, Iα, fission fragments, (fragments)α-coin, angular distributions using multiwire proportional counters (MWPC) for detection of fission fragments, and an array of CsI detectors for α particles at 15UD Pelletron facility of IUAC-New Delhi; deduced particle identification plot, fission fragments mass ratio distribution, normalized α-particle multiplicity spectra, dissipation energy and dinucleus elongation as function of time and angular momentum, transient times and saddle to scission times. Comparison with statistical model calculations using JOANNE2 code.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054605
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6324.


2017SH33      Phys.Rev. C 96, 034613 (2017)

P.Sharma, B.R.Behera, R.Mahajan, M.Thakur, G.Kaur, K.Kapoor, K.Rani, N.Madhavan, S.Nath, J.Gehlot, R.Dubey, I.Mazumdar, S.M.Patel, M.Dhibar, M.M.Hosamani, Khushboo, N.Kumar, A.Shamlath, G.Mohanto, S.Pal

Evaporation residue cross-section measurements for 48Ti-induced reactions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 142Nd(48Ti, X), E(cm)=140.43-202.01 MeV; 150Nd, (48Ti, X), E(cm)=142.18-204.61 MeV; 144Sm(48Ti, X), E(cm)=140.83-202.63 MeV; measured yield of evaporation residues (ERs) from two-dimensional time-of-flight and energy loss spectra, and σ(ER) using gas-filled mode of hybrid recoil mass analyzer (HYRA) at 15UD Pelletron+LINAC accelerator facility of IUAC-New Delhi. Comparison with statistical model calculations, using coupled-channel code CCFULL to obtain spin distribution of the compound nucleus.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.034613
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6320.


2017SH51      Nucl.Phys. A968, 326 (2017)

P.Sharma

Role of nuclear charge change and nuclear recoil on shaking processes and their possible implication on physical processes

ATOMIC PHYSICS 19F, 40Ar; calculated shakeoff probability of WIMP interaction with atomic target vs recoil energy. 22Ne(α, γ), E not given; calculated atomic process shakeoff probability vs recoil energy. 20Ne(n, n), (n, α), E=5 MeV; calculated shakeoff probability vs WIMP mass.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.08.004
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2017TH04      Eur.Phys.J. A 53, 133 (2017)

M.Thakur, B.R.Behera, R.Mahajan, N.Saneesh, G.Kaur, P.Sharma, R.Dubey, K.Kapoor, A.Yadav, N.Kumar, S.Kumar, K.Rani, P.Sugathan, A.Jhingan, A.Chatterjee, M.B.Chatterjee, S.Mandal, A.Saxena, S.Pal, S.Kailas, A.Nasirov, B.Kayumov

Binary fragmentation based studies for the near super-heavy compound nucleus 256Rf

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(48Ti, x), E=275 MeV; measured fission fragments using MWPCs; deduced intermediate mass fragments mass distribution, TKE; calculated QF (QuasiFission), FF (Fast Fission), DNS (Double Nuclear System) yields separately, especially close to near superheavy 256Rf. Compared to data.

doi: 10.1140/epja/i2017-12323-5
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2016KA10      Acta Phys.Pol. B47, 847 (2016)

G.Kaur, B.R.Behera, A.Jhingan, B.K.Nayak, R.Dubey, P.Sharma, M.Thakur, R.Mahajan, N.Saneesh, T.Banerjee, Khushboo, A.Kumar, S.Mandal, A.Saxena, P.Sugathan, N.Rowley

Measurement of Quasi-elastic Scattering: to Probe 28Si+154Sm Reaction

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 154Sm(28Si, 28Si), E=118 MeV; measured reaction products; deduced quasi-elastic σ, experimental barrier distribution.

doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.47.847
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2016KA39      Phys.Rev. C 94, 034613 (2016)

G.Kaur, B.R.Behera, A.Jhingan, B.K.Nayak, R.Dubey, P.Sharma, M.Thakur, R.Mahajan, N.Saneesh, T.Banerjee, Khushboo, A.Kumar, S.Mandal, A.Saxena, P.Sugathan, N.Rowley

Effect of coupling in the 28Si + 154Sm reaction studied by quasi-elastic scattering

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 154Sm(28Si, X), E=90.0-135.0 MeV; measured projectile-like fragments using ΔE-E hybrid telescope detector at IUAC 15UD Pelletron accelerator facility; deduced quasi-elastic σ(E) and corresponding barrier distribution, influence of couplings to excited states in 28Si projectile and in 154Sm target on fusion σ. Comparison with 154Sm(16O, X) data, and with coupled-channels predictions.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.034613
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2016RA19      Phys.Rev. C 93, 054622 (2016)

T.Rajbongshi, K.Kalita, S.Nath, J.Gehlot, T.Banerjee, I.Mukul, R.Dubey, N.Madhavan, C.J.Lin, A.Shamlath, P.V.Laveen, M.Shareef, N.Kumar, P.Jisha, P.Sharma

Deformation effects on sub-barrier fusion cross sections in 16O + 174, 176Yb

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 174,176Yb(16O, X), E=64.6-103.6 MeV; measured evaporation residues (ER), scatter plots between ΔE and TOF of the events, fusion σ(E) using HIRA recoil mass spectrometer at IUAC-New Delhi; deduced barrier distribution, hexadecapole deformation parameter (β4). Comparison with coupled-Channel calculations using CCFULL code.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054622
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6275.


2015SA16      Phys.Rev. C 91, 044621 (2015)

R.Sandal, B.R.Behera, V.Singh, M.Kaur, A.Kumar, G.Kaur, P.Sharma, N.Madhavan, S.Nath, J.Gehlot, A.Jhingan, K.S.Golda, H.Singh, S.Mandal, S.Verma, E.Prasad, K.M.Varier, A.M.Vinodkumar, A.Saxena, J.Sadhukhan, S.Pal

Probing nuclear dissipation via evaporation residue excitation functions for the 16, 18O+198Pt reactions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 198Pt(16O, 16O), (16O, X)214Rn*, E=78.0-105.6 MeV; 198Pt(18O, 18O), (18O, X)216Rn*, E=77.8-105.4; measured evaporation residues (ER), scattered 16,18O spectra, TOF spectrum, angular distributions of ERs, σ(E) for ERs and fusion using HYRA analyzer at IUAC-New Delhi 15 UD Pelletron facility. Comparison with statistical model calculations of compound nuclear decay with Kramers' fission width.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.044621
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6263.


2015SH26      Nucl.Phys. A941, 265 (2015)

P.Sharma, T.Nandi

Theoretical studies on shaking processes in nuclear transfer reactions

ATOMIC PHYSICS 56Fe(12C, 8Be), E not given; calculated electron shaking probabilities for various atomic shells.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.07.006
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2007AN01      Pramana 68, 105 (2007)

A.Ansari, P.Sharma, U.R.Jakhar, H.L.Yadav

Shape evolution in 76, 78Kr nuclei at high spins in tilted axis cranking Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov approach

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 76,78Kr; calculated rotational band level energies, deformation parameters, configurations. Tilted-axis cranking model.

doi: 10.1007/s12043-007-0012-x
Citations: PlumX Metrics


Back to query form


Note: The following list of authors and aliases matches the search parameter P.Sharma: , P.K.SHARMA