NSR Query Results


Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of May 23, 2024.

Search: Author = P.Jisha

Found 8 matches.

Back to query form



2022JI08      Phys.Rev. C 105, 054614 (2022)

P.Jisha, A.M.Vinodkumar, S.Sanila, K.Arjun, B.R.S.Babu, J.Gehlot, S.Nath, N.Madhavan, R.Biswas, A.Parihari, A.Vinayak, A.Mahato, E.Prasad, A.C.Visakh

Role of positive transfer Q values in fusion cross sections for 18O + 182, 184, 186W reactions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 182,184,186W(18O, X), E=68-104 MeV; measured reaction products, evaporation residues, beam-like particles; deduced evaporation residues σ(E) , fusion σ(E). Comparison to coupled channels calculations (CCFULL code) with inclusion of different inelastic channels. Systematics of fusion σ(E) in reactions induced by 16O and 18O. Heavy Ion Reaction Analyser (HIRA) at the 15 UD Pelletron accelerator facility of the Inter-University Accelerator Centre (IUAC), New Delhi

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.054614
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6432.


2020JI03      Phys.Rev. C 101, 024611 (2020)

P.Jisha, A.M.Vinodkumar, B.R.S.Babu, S.Nath, N.Madhavan, J.Gehlot, A.Jhingan, T.Banerjee, Ish Mukul, R.Dubey, N.Saneesh, K.M.Varier, E.Prasad, A.Shamlath, P.V.Laveen, M.Shareef

Evaporation residue measurements of compound nuclei in the A ≈ 200 region

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 181Ta(16O, X), (18O, X), E=68-110 MeV; measured reaction products, time-of-flight and E-ΔE, evaporation residue σ(E). Comparison with coupled-channel (CC) calculations using CCFULL code. 181Ta(16O, X), (18O, X), E(cm)=60-120 MeV; 180Hf(19F, X), E(cm)=70-115 MeV; analyzed present and previous experimental σ(E) data using the HIVAP code. 181Ta(12C, X), (13C, X), (16O, X), (18O, X), 174,176Yb, 181Ta, 182,184W(16O, X), E(cm)/VB=0.9-1.5; analyzed experimental data in literature for reduced cross sections of evaporation residues. 204,206,208Pb(12C, X), 180Hf, 181Ta, 197Au, 194,198Pt(19F, X), 181Ta, 188,192Os, 197Au(18O, X), 181Ta, 184,186W, 188,192Os, 197Au(16O, X), E not given; analyzed experimental data in literature for charge products ZpZt and neutron numbers of compound nuclei, fission barriers scaling factors, ratio of mass asymmetry values, and fusion probabilities.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.024611
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6379.


2020LA12      Phys.Rev. C 102, 034613 (2020)

P.V.Laveen, E.Prasad, N.Madhavan, A.K.Nasirov, J.Gehlot, S.Nath, G.Mandaglio, G.Giardina, A.M.Vinodkumar, M.Shareef, A.Shamlath, S.K.Duggi, P.Sandya Devi, T.Banerjee, M.M.Hosamani, Khushboo, P.Jisha, N.Kumar, P.Sharma, T.Varughese

Fusion studies in 35, 37Cl + 181Ta reactions via evaporation residue cross section measurements

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 181Ta(35Cl, X), (37Cl, X), E=169.7-236.6 MeV; measured evaporation residues (ERs) using HYbrid Recoil mass Analyzer (HYRA) and position sensitive multiwire proportional counter (MWPC) at the 15-UD Pelletron and superconducting linear accelerator (sc-LINAC) facility of IUAC-New Delhi; deduced σ(E), partial capture, fusion, fast fission and quasifission and total ER cross sections; calculated potential energy surface (PES) of populating 216Th compound nucleus as a function of the distance between the interacting nuclei and charge numbers (Z) of the fragments. Comparison with dinuclear system (DNS) model and statistical model calculations.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.034613
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6392.


2019GE02      Phys.Rev. C 99, 034615 (2019)

J.Gehlot, A.M.Vinodkumar, N.Madhavan, S.Nath, A.Jhingan, T.Varughese, T.Banerjee, A.Shamlath, P.V.Laveen, M.Shareef, P.Jisha, P.Sandya Devi, G.N.Jyothi, M.M.Hosamani, I.Mazumdar, V.I.Chepigin, M.L.Chelnokov, A.V.Yeremin, A.K.Sinha, B.R.S.Babu

Evaporation residue cross-section measurements for 16O+203, 205Tl

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 203,205Tl(16O, X), E=82-113 MeV; measured reaction products, time of flight, σ(E) of evaporation residues (ERs), and individual exit channel σ(E) using gas-filled HYbrid Recoil Analyzer (HYRA) for separation of ERs, two silicon detectors and a multiwire proportional counter (MWPC) to detect the ERs at the 15 UD Pelletron accelerator facility of IUAC, New Delhi; simulated ER angular distributions using the code PACE4. 209Bi(12C, X), E(cm)=50-115 MeV; 208Pb(12C, X), (16O, X), (19F, X); 203,205Tl(16O, X), E=82-113 MeV; 204Pb(16O, X); 209Bi(12C, X); comparison of the present and previously measured reduced σ(E) with statistical model calculations using HIVAP code.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.034615
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6363.


2019GE03      Phys.Rev. C 99, 061601 (2019)

J.Gehlot, S.Nath, T.Banerjee, Is.Mukul, R.Dubey, A.Shamlath, P.V.Laveen, M.Shareef, Md.M.Shaikh, A.Jhingan, N.Madhavan, T.Rajbongshi, P.Jisha, S.Pal

Search for stabilizing effects of the Z=82 shell closure against fission

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 180Hf(19F, X)199Tl*,181Ta(19F, X)200Pb*,182W(19F, X)201Bi*, E=4.2-6.3 MeV/nucleon; measured charged-particle spectra, time-of-flight (TOF), ΔE versus TOF plots, evaporation residue (ER) σ(E) using the Heavy Ion Reaction Analyzer (HIRA) at IUAC-New Delhi accelerator facility; calculated capture σ(E) and ER σ(E) using coupled-channels formalism and statistical model, respectively. Comparison between measurements and calculations; deduced no enhanced stabilizing effects of the Z=82 shell closure against fission in the compound nucleus.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.061601
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6365.


2018SH28      J.Phys.(London) G45, 095103 (2018)

M.M.Shaikh, S.Nath, J.Gehlot, T.Banerjee, I.Mukul, R.Dubey, A.Shamlath, P.V.Laveen, M.Shareef, A.Jhingan, N.Madhavan, T.Rajbongshi, P.Jisha, G.N.Jyothi, A.Tejaswi, R.N.Sahoo, A.Rani

Investigation of fusion hindrance in a soft asymmetric system deep below the barrier

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 181Ta(19F, X), E=73.7, 85.7 MeV; measured reaction products, TOF; deduced σ. Comparison with theoretical calculations.

doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/aad5c7
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2017SH06      Phys.Rev. C 95, 034610 (2017)

A.Shamlath, E.Prasad, N.Madhavan, P.V.Laveen, J.Gehlot, A.K.Nasirov, G.Giardina, G.Mandaglio, S.Nath, T.Banerjee, A.M.Vinodkumar, M.Shareef, A.Jhingan, T.Varughese, D.Kumar, P.Sandya Devi, Khushboo, P.Jisha, N.Kumar, M.M.Hosamani, S.Kailas

Fusion and quasifission studies in reactions forming Rn via evaporation residue measurements

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 180Hf(28Si, X)208Rn*, E=130.6, 135.0, 143.9, 149.4, 154.9, 164.2, 171.9, 193.7 MeV; 180Hf(30Si, X)210Rn*, E=130.6, 135.2, 139.6, 144.0, 149.5, 156.3, 160.7, 164.3, 171.8 MeV; measured evaporation residues (ERs) ERs, ΔE vs TOF plots, ER σ(Ε) using the Hybrid Recoil Mass Analyzer (HYRA) at the 15 UD Pelletron accelerator of IUAC-New Delhi. Comparison with theoretical cross sections, using dinuclear system and statistical models, and with the results of 194Pt(16O, X)210Rn* and 160Gd(50Ti, X)210Rn* compound nuclear reactions.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.034610
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6318.


2016RA19      Phys.Rev. C 93, 054622 (2016)

T.Rajbongshi, K.Kalita, S.Nath, J.Gehlot, T.Banerjee, I.Mukul, R.Dubey, N.Madhavan, C.J.Lin, A.Shamlath, P.V.Laveen, M.Shareef, N.Kumar, P.Jisha, P.Sharma

Deformation effects on sub-barrier fusion cross sections in 16O + 174, 176Yb

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 174,176Yb(16O, X), E=64.6-103.6 MeV; measured evaporation residues (ER), scatter plots between ΔE and TOF of the events, fusion σ(E) using HIRA recoil mass spectrometer at IUAC-New Delhi; deduced barrier distribution, hexadecapole deformation parameter (β4). Comparison with coupled-Channel calculations using CCFULL code.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054622
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetD6275.


Back to query form