NSR Query Results


Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 11, 2024.

Search: Author = N.Sensharma

Found 7 matches.

Back to query form



2024SA09      Phys.Rev. C 109, 024319 (2024)

A.Saracino, S.Zhu, N.Sensharma, A.D.Ayangeakaa, R.V.F.Janssens, Q.B.Chen, M.P.Carpenter, P.Chowdhury, A.Gade, F.G.Kondev, T.M.Kowalewski, T.Lauritsen, E.A.McCutchan, D.Seweryniak

Collective modes of excitation in 64Cu

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.109.024319
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2022AY02      Phys.Rev. C 105, 054315 (2022)

A.D.Ayangeakaa, N.Sensharma, M.Fulghieri, R.V.F.Janssens, Q.B.Chen, S.Zhu, M.Alcorta, M.P.Carpenter, P.Chowdhury, A.Gade, C.R.Hoffman, F.G.Kondev, T.Lauritsen, E.A.McCutchan, A.M.Rogers, D.Seweryniak

Single-particle and collective excitations in 66Zn

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 26Mg(48Ca, 4nα), E=275, 290, 320 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, γ(θ), γγ-coin. 66Zn; deduced levels, J, π, angular correlation ratios, experimental angular distribution coefficients, δ, rotational bands structure, high-spin states. Comparison to spherical shell-model calculations using the jj44b and JUN45 effective interactions. Experimental data on rotational band is compared to the calculations made within configuration-fixed constrained covariant density functional theory (CDFT) and the quantum particle rotor model (PRM) formalism. Systematics for superderformed bands in 60Zn, 66Zn, 68Zn, 68Ge. Gammasphere array with 101 detectors in conjunction with the fragment mass analyzer (FMA) and a microchannel plate (MCP) detector at ATLAS accelerator (ANL).

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.054315
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.


2022SE03      Phys.Rev. C 105, 044315 (2022)

N.Sensharma, A.D.Ayangeakaa, R.V.F.Janssens, Q.B.Chen, S.Zhu, M.Alcorta, M.P.Carpenter, E.A.McCutchan, F.G.Kondev, T.Lauritsen, D.Seweryniak, C.R.Hoffman, A.M.Rogers, A.Gade, T.Baugher, P.Chowdhury

Single-particle and dipole excitations in 62Co

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 26Mg(48Ca, 3np2α), E=275, 290, 320 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, γ(θ), γγ-coin. 62Co; deduced levels, J, π, angular correlation ratios, experimental angular distribution coefficients, multipolarities, rotational bands structures. Comparison to shell-model calculations using the GXPF1A two-body effective interaction. Systematics for magnetic rotational bands in 60Co, 61Co, 62Co, 58Fe. Gammasphere array with 101 detectors in conjunction with the fragment mass analyzer (FMA) and a microchannel plate (MCP) detector at ATLAS accelerator (ANL).

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.044315
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.


2022VA04      Phys.Rev. C 105, 055802 (2022)

B.Vande Kolk, K.T.Macon, R.J.deBoer, T.Anderson, A.Boeltzig, K.Brandenburg, C.R.Brune, Y.Chen, A.M.Clark, T.Danley, B.Frentz, R.Giri, J.Gorres, M.Hall, S.L.Henderson, E.Holmbeck, K.B.Howard, D.Jacobs, J.Lai, Q.Liu, J.Long, K.Manukyan, T.Massey, M.Moran, L.Morales, D.Odell, P.O'Malley, S.N.Paneru, A.Richard, D.Schneider, M.Skulski, N.Sensharma, C.Seymour, G.Seymour, D.Soltesz, S.Strauss, A.Voinov, L.Wustrich, M.Wiescher

Investigation of the 10B (p, α)7Be reaction from 0.8 to 2.0 MeV

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 10B(p, α), (p, p), E=0.8-2.0 MeV; measured Eα, Iα, Ep, Ip; deduced σ(θ), σ(E) S-factor, resonance parameters of 10B+p system - energy, spin, partial (p0, α0, α1) and total width. 10B(p, γ), E=0 .1-2.0 MeV; deduced σ(θ). 11C; deduced levels, J, π. R-matrix analysis. Measurements were made at the University of Notre Dame (UND) Nuclear Science Laboratory (NSL) using a degrader foil method, while those at the Edwards AcceleratorLaboratory at Ohio University (OU) were performed using the time-of-flight (ToF)technique. Comparison with other experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.055802
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetC2767. Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.


2020GU11      Phys.Lett. B 806, 135473 (2020)

Y.K.Gupta, B.K.Nayak, U.Garg, K.Hagino, K.B.Howard, N.Sensharma, M.Senyigit, W.P.Tan, P.D.O'Malley, M.Smith, R.Gandhi, T.Anderson, R.J.deBoer, B.Frentz, A.Gyurjinyan, O.Hall, M.R.Hall, J.Hu, E.Lamere, Q.Liu, A.Long, W.Lu, S.Lyons, K.Ostdiek, C.Seymour, M.Skulski, B.Vande Kolk

Determination of hexadecapole (β4) deformation of the light-mass nucleus 24Mg using quasi-elastic scattering measurements

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 90Zr(16O, 16O), (24Mg, 24Mg), E=61 MeV; measured reaction products. 24Mg; deduced deformation parameters, σ, B(Eλ). CCFULL calculations.

doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135473
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.


2020SE02      Phys.Rev.Lett. 124, 052501 (2020)

N.Sensharma, U.Garg, Q.B.Chen, S.Frauendorf, D.P.Burdette, J.L.Cozzi, K.B.Howard, S.Zhu, M.P.Carpenter, P.Copp, F.G.Kondev, T.Lauritsen, J.Li, D.Seweryniak, J.Wu, A.D.Ayangeakaa, D.J.Hartley, R.V.F.Janssens, A.M.Forney, W.B.Walters, S.S.Ghugre, R.Palit

Longitudinal Wobbling Motion in 187Au

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 174Yb(19F, X)187Au, E=105, 115 MeV; measured reaction products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced γ-ray energies and intensities, J, π, yrast band, B(M1)/B(E2). Comparison with PRM calculations.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.052501
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.


2019SE06      Phys.Lett. B 792, 170 (2019), Erratum Phys.Lett. B 820, 136556 (2021)

N.Sensharma, U.Garg, S.Zhu, A.D.Ayangeakaa, S.Frauendorf, W.Li, G.H.Bhat, J.A.Sheikh, M.P.Carpenter, Q.B.Chen, J.L.Cozzi, S.S.Ghugre, Y.K.Gupta, D.J.Hartley, K.B.Howard, R.V.F.Janssens, F.G.Kondev, T.C.McMaken, R.Palit, J.Sethi, D.Seweryniak, R.P.Singh

Two-phonon wobbling in 135Pr

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 135Pr; analyzed available data; deduced wobbling. Comparison with theoretical calculations in the framework of the quasiparticle triaxial rotor and triaxial projected shell models.

doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.03.038
Citations: PlumX Metrics


Back to query form