NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of May 1, 2024. Search: Author = V.Zanganeh Found 14 matches. 2023SA51 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E32, 2350047 (2023) K.P.Santhosh, D.T.Akrawy, T.A.Jose, Ali H.Ahmed, H.Hassanabadi, S.S.Hosseini, V.Zanganah, L.Sihver A systematic study of α-decay half-lives for Ac, Th, Pa, U and Np isotopes with A = 205-245 using the modified generalized liquid drop model RADIOACTIVITY 205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237Ac, 208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239Th, 211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241Pa, 214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243U, 219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245Np(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301323500477
2023ZA01 Nucl.Phys. A1029, 122561 (2023) V.Zanganeh, S.S.Hosseini, A.M.Izadpanah Theoretical calculation of alpha decay half-lives of Neptunium nuclei using modified generalized liquid drop model RADIOACTIVITY 219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239Np(α); calculated T1/2 using the generalized liquid-drop model (GLDM) with 1977 nuclear proximity potential suggested by Blocki et al. (1977). Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122561
2020IZ01 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E29, 2050095 (2020) A.M.Izadpanah, S.S.Hosseini, V.Zanganeh Theoretical cluster decay predictions for the nuclei 245-260Md with different nuclear potentials RADIOACTIVITY 245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260Md(α), (8Be), (12C), (16O), (20Ne), (24Mg), (28Si), (32S), (36Ar), (40Ca); calculated T1/2 within the nuclear potentials generalized liquid drop model (GLDM) and also within GLDM with modified different nuclear potentials, namely proximity potential 2010, 1977, 1988, 2000 and 2002. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301320500950
2020ZA03 Nucl.Phys. A997, 121714(2020) V.Zanganah, D.T.Akrawy, H.Hassanabadi, S.S.Hosseini, S.Thakur Calculation of α-decay and cluster half-lives for 197-226Fr using temperature-dependent proximity potential model
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121714
2019GH06 Nucl.Phys. A990, 47 (2019) R.Gharaei, A.Hadikhani, V.Zanganeh An explanation for the anomaly problem of diffuseness parameter of the nucleus-nucleus potential in heavy-ion fusion reactions: A possible thermal solution
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.06.003
2019ZA10 Nucl.Phys. A992, 121637 (2019) V.Zanganeh, R.Gharaei, A.M.Izadpanah Comparative study for different nuclear proximity potentials applied to quasi-elastic scattering and fusion reactions
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.121637
2018GH06 Nucl.Phys. A979, 237 (2018) Systematic study of proximity potentials for heavy-ion fusion cross sections NUCLEAR REACTIONS 24Mg(34S, x), E(cm)=24-33 MeV;30Si(28Si, x), E(cm)=25-37 MeV;40Ca(40Ca, x), E(cm)=47-66 MeV;48Ti(40Ca, x), E(cm)=53-85 MeV;32S(24Mg, x), E(cm)=26-33 MeV;54Fe(35Cl, x), E(cm)=55-82 MeV;72Ge(16O, x), E(cm)=30-52 MeV;186W(16O, x), E(c)=62-98 MeV;92Zr(28Si, x), E(cm)=63-90 MeV;144Sm(16O, x), E(cm)=56-90 MeV; calculated fusion σ using EBDM (Empirical Barrier Distribution Model) with different proximity potentials and also using coupled channels; compared with data; deduced the best of 14 tested proximity potentials.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.09.032
2017ZA04 Phys.Rev. C 95, 034620 (2017) Dynamical explanation for the anomaly in the diffuseness parameter of the nucleus-nucleus potential in heavy-ion fusion reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 46Ti(40Ca, X), E(cm)=65, 75 MeV; calculated time evolution of density distribution. 92Zr(16O, X), E(cm)=45, 50, 55, 60 MeV; 92Zr(28Si, X), E(cm)=70, 75, 80, 85 MeV; calculated dynamical nucleus-nucleus potentials. 92Zr(12C, X), E(cm)=28-43 MeV; 92Zr(16O, X), E(cm)=37-65 MeV; 92Zr(28Si, X), E(cm)=65-90 MeV; 92Zr(35Cl, X), E(cm)=77-105 MeV; 46Ti(40Ca, X), E(cm)=54-80 MeV; 154Sm(16O, X), E(cm)=52-75 MeV; calculated fusion σ(E), diffuseness parameter as a function of incident energy. Improved quantum molecular dynamics (ImQMD) model. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.034620
2016GH04 Nucl.Phys. A952, 28 (2016) Temperature-dependent potential in cluster-decay process RADIOACTIVITY 221Fr, 221,222,223,224,226Ra, 225Ac, 224,226Th(14C);226,228Th(18O);231Pa(23F);230,232Th, 231Pa, 230,232,233,234(24Ne);233U(25Ne);232Th, 234,236U(26Ne);236Pu(28Mg);237Np, 238Pu(30Mg);241Am, 242Cm(34Si); calculated minimum angular momentum, temperature, T1/2; deduced proximity potential Hf parameter. T1/2 compared to data. Z=56-104; calculated T1/2; deduced temperature dependence of emission of 26Mg and 28Mg clusters on parent mass for Np decays. T1/2 compared with published ASAF approach. WKB approximation with two different proximity 2010 potentials.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.04.001
2014ZA07 Nucl.Phys. A929, 94 (2014) Temperature-dependent potential in alpha-decay process RADIOACTIVITY Pb, Po, Rn, Ra(α); calculated T1/2 for even-even isotopes. 220,227Th, 231Np, 246Es(α); calculated T1/2 vs temperature. A=150-266(α); calculated T1/2; deduced temperature of parent nuclei. Temperature dependent proximity potential.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.06.001
2013GO15 Chin.Phys.Lett. 30, 102502 (2013) M.Golshanian, O.N.Ghodsi, R.Gharaei, V.Zanganeh The Analysis of the Fusion Reaction of two Colliding Nuclei Using the FCC Lattice Model NUCLEAR REACTIONS 64Ni, 92Zr(28Si, X), 60Ni(58Ni, X), 58Ni(48Ti, X), 48Ti(40Ca, X), 46Ti(46Ti, X), E<120 MeV; calculated fusion cross sections based on the FCC+CDM3Y6 model. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/30/10/102502
2012ZA02 Phys.Rev. C 85, 034601 (2012) V.Zanganeh, N.Wang, O.N.Ghodsi Dynamical nucleus-nucleus potential and incompressibility of nuclear matter NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(48Ca, X), E(cm)=179, 200, 205 MeV; calculated time evolution of density distribution, dynamical nucleus-nucleus potential, nuclear potential. 208Pb(16O, X), E(cm)=70-110 MeV; calculated fusion excitation function, dynamical nucleus-nucleus potential. 197Au(197Au, X), 40Ca(40Ca, X), E=35 MeV/nucleon; calculated fragment charge distribution. Improved quantum molecular-dynamics (ImQMD) model using several interactions. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.034601
2010GH04 Nucl.Phys. A846, 40 (2010) The effect of the nuclear state equation on the surface diffuseness parameter of the Woods-Saxon potential in the heavy ion fusion reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 92Zr(12C, X), E(cm)=28-41 MeV; 92Zr(16O, X), E(cm)=37-70 MeV; 92Zr(28Si, X), E(cm)=65-88 MeV; 92Zr(35Cl, X), E(cm)=75-98 MeV; calculated complete fusion σ, intranuclear potential and barrier distribution.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.06.005
2009GH03 Phys.Rev. C 79, 044604 (2009) Calculation of the total potential between two deformed heavy ion nuclei using the Monte Carlo method and M3Y nucleon-nucleon forces NUCLEAR REACTIONS 46Ti(46Ti, X), E not given; 238U(48Ca, X), E not given; 70Ge(27Al, X), E not given; calculated height and location of fusion barriers, densities of participating nuclei using Monte Carlo simulation and double- folding model calculations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.044604
Back to query form |