NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = H.Hassanabadi Found 57 matches. 2023SA51 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E32, 2350047 (2023) K.P.Santhosh, D.T.Akrawy, T.A.Jose, Ali H.Ahmed, H.Hassanabadi, S.S.Hosseini, V.Zanganah, L.Sihver A systematic study of α-decay half-lives for Ac, Th, Pa, U and Np isotopes with A = 205-245 using the modified generalized liquid drop model RADIOACTIVITY 205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237Ac, 208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239Th, 211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241Pa, 214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243U, 219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245Np(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301323500477
2021GU19 Eur.Phys.J. A 57, 192 (2021); Erratum Eur.Phys.J. A 57, 256 (2021) A.Guvendi, S.Zare, H.Hassanabadi Vector boson oscillator in the spiral dislocation spacetime
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00514-8
2021SO17 Nucl.Phys. A1013, 122224 (2021) H.Sobhani, H.Hassanabadi, D.Bonatsos, L.Sihver An analytical description of the parity-doublet structure in an odd-A nucleus NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 151Pm; analyzed available data; calculated energylevels, J, π, B(E1).
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122224
2020HO08 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E29, 2050008 (2020) S.S.Hosseini, H.Hassanabadi, D.T.Akrawy, A.H.Ahmed Theoretical studies on Alpha decay half-lives of Astatine isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219At(α); calculated Q-values, T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301320500081
2020SA23 Phys.Rev. C 101, 064610 (2020) K.P.Santhosh, D..Akrawy, H.Hassanabadi, Al.H.Ahmed, T.A.Jose α-decay half-lives of lead isotopes within a modified generalized liquid drop model RADIOACTIVITY 178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220Pb(α); calculated half-lives using modified generalized liquid drop model (MGLDM) with Akrawy, Royer, AKRE, and modified RenB formulas, and experimental Q(α) values. Comparison with available experimental half-lives, and with predicted half-lives in Coulomb and proximity potential model.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.064610
2020SO04 Eur.Phys.J. A 56, 29 (2020) H.Sobhani, H.Hassanabadi, D.Bonatsos, F.Pan, S.Cui, Z.Feng, J.P.Draayer Analytical study of the γ-unstable Bohr Hamiltonian with quasi-exactly solvable decatic potential
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00048-5
2020SO17 Nucl.Phys. A1002, 121956 (2020) H.Sobhani, H.Hassanabadi, D.Bonatsos, F.Pan, J.P.Draayer γ-Unstable Bohr Hamiltonian with sextic potential for odd-A nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 187,189,191,193,195Ir; analyzed available data; calculated energy ratios, B(E2) using the collective model of the γ-unstable Bohr Hamiltonian with the quasi exactly solvable sextic potential.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121956
2020ZA03 Nucl.Phys. A997, 121714(2020) V.Zanganah, D.T.Akrawy, H.Hassanabadi, S.S.Hosseini, S.Thakur Calculation of α-decay and cluster half-lives for 197-226Fr using temperature-dependent proximity potential model
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121714
2019AK02 Nucl.Phys. A983, 310 (2019) D.T.Akrawy, H.Hassanabadi, Y.Qian, K.P.Santhosh Influence of nuclear isospin and angular momentum on α-decay half-lives RADIOACTIVITY 246,252,248,254,250,256,255,253Fm, 252,256No, 255,257Lr, 258,256,263Rf, 257,259,263,256Db, 260,262,259,271,261,269Sg, 267,264,272,266,274,270Bh, 264,266,270,273,265,267Hs, 275,274,276,268,278Mt, 270,271,281,267,273,277Ds, 279,272,280,278Rg, 281Cn, 283,285,284,278,282Nh, 286,288Fl, 290Mc, 290,292Lv, 293,294Ts, 294Og(α); analyzed available data; calculated T1/2; deduced influence of isospin and angular momentum on α-decay half-lives. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.10.091
2019AK07 Phys.Rev. C 100, 034608 (2019) D.T.Akrawy, K.P.Santhosh, H.Hassanabadi α-decay half-lives of some superheavy nuclei within a modified generalized liquid drop model RADIOACTIVITY 246,248,250,252,253,254,255,256Fm, 252,256No, 255,257Lr, 256,258,263Rf, 256,257,259,263Db, 259,260,261,262,269,271Sg, 264,266,267,270,272,274Bh, 264,265,266,267,270,273Hs, 268,274,275,276,278Mt, 267,270,271,273,277,281Ds, 272,278,279,280Rg, 281Cn, 278,282,283,284,285Nh, 286,288Fl, 290Mc, 290,292Lv, 293,294Ts, 294Og(α); calculated half-lives for α decay using modified generalized liquid drop model (MGLDM). Comparison with other theoretical models, and with available experimental values.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.034608
2019AK13 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E28, 1950075 (2019) D.T.Akrawy, H.Hassanabadi, S.S.Hosseini, K.P.Santhosh Systematic study of alpha decay half-lives using new universal decay law RADIOACTIVITY 271Sg, 272Bh, 275Hs, 275,276Mt, 279Ds, 279,280Rg, 283,285Cn, 283,284Nh, 286,287,288,289Fl, 287,288Mc, 290,291,292,293Lv, 294Ts, 294Og(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/s0218301319500757
2019HO06 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E28, 1950017 (2019) S.S.Hosseini, H.Hassanabadi, D.T.Akrawy α-Decay half-lives of even-even nuclei of Pb, Po, Rn and Ra isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194Pb, 210Pb, 188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218Po, 198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222Rn, 202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226Ra(α); calculated T1/2 using emi-empirical, one-parameter model based on tunneling through a potential barrier with the centrifugal and over-lapping effects.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301319500174
2019HO11 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E28, 1950043 (2019) S.S.Hosseini, H.Hassanabadi, D.T.Akrawy, S.Zarrinkamar Alpha-decay half-lives of polonium isotopes in the mass range of 186-218 RADIOACTIVITY 186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219Po(α); calculated Q-values, T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301319500435
2019SO02 Nucl.Phys. A983, 229 (2019) Non-degenerate γ-unstable Bohr Hamiltonian considering Killingbeck potential NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 118,120,122,124Xe; calculated energy levels, J, π of gs, quasi-γ and quasi-β bands, E2 transition rates normalized to B(E2, 4g to 2g) using Bohr Hamiltonian; compared to data; deduced staggering in gamma band.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.11.015
2019SO03 Nucl.Phys. A986, 223 (2019) The controlled single particle: A new concept in odd-mass nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 155Tb; calculated levels, J, π using "controlled single particle" model, suitable for odd-mass nuclei. Compared to data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.03.015
2019SO13 Nucl.Phys. A989, 135 (2019) Application of the controlled single particle concept in the γ-rigid Bohr Hamiltonian for γ = 30 degrees NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 189Ir; calculated E((11/2)+) / E((7/2)+) and E((9/2)+) / E((7/2)+) for the gs-like band, the first γ-like band and the second γ-like band using Controlled Single Particle (CSP) concept and B(E2) transition rates, ground-like quantum numbers of states; compared with data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.05.015
2019SO20 Nucl.Phys. A992, 121621 (2019) CSP-Z(5 over 2J+1) Application of the controlled single particle concept for the prolate to oblate nuclear shape phase transition in odd-A nuclei
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.121621
2018AK03 Nucl.Phys. A971, 130 (2018) D.T.Akrawy, H.Hassanabadi, S.S.Hosseini, K.P.Santhosh Systematic study of α-decay half-lives using Royer and related formula RADIOACTIVITY N=50-180(α); calculated T1/2 for 356 isotopes (separately odd-odd, even-even, odd-even and even-odd nuclei) using different semiempirical formulae; deduced formulae parameters, Royer formula having the highest predictive power using comparison with the data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.01.018
2018AK04 Nucl.Phys. A975, 19 (2018) D.T.Akrawy, H.Hassanabadi, S.S.Hosseini, K.P.Santhosh Nuclear isospin effect on α-decay half-lives Original research article RADIOACTIVITY Z=52-118(α); calculated T1/2 using analytical formulas of Royer and Denisov-Khudenko formula; deduced new parameters for both formulas using fit of data for 356 isotopes. Calculated T1/2 compared to data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.04.001
2018HA18 Nucl.Phys. A974, 72 (2018) Branching ratios of a-decay to ground and excited states of Fm, Cf, Cm and Pu RADIOACTIVITY 234,236,238,240,242,244Pu, 238,240,242,244,246,248Cm, 244,246,248,250,252Cf, 248,250,252,254Fm(α); calculated α-decay branching ratios for gs and excited states using WKB barrier penetration probability, Q, α-particle angular momentum, T1/2 using proximity potential; compared branching ratios to data; deduced agreement for 0+ to 0+, 2+, 4+, 6+, 8+ calculations with data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.03.006
2018HA25 Phys.Rev. C 98, 014312 (2018) Elimination of degeneracy in the γ-unstable Bohr Hamiltonian in the presence of an extended sextic potential NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 118,120,122,124,126,128Xe; calculated levels, J, π, g.s., γ1 and β1 bands, level staggering in γ band, and B(E2) using γ-unstable Bohr Hamiltonian with extended sextic potential. Comparison with experimental data taken from the ENSDF database.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.014312
2018HA33 Can.J.Phys. 96, 1059 (2018) Observation of ultra-fine structures in energy levels of prolate nuclei
doi: 10.1139/cjp-2017-0403
2018HO01 Nucl.Phys. A970, 259 (2018) S.S.Hosseini, H.Hassanabadi, S.Zarrinkamar A comparative analysis of alpha-decay half-lives for even-even 178Pb to 234U isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,210Pb, 190,192,194,196,198,200,202,208,210,212,214,216,218Po, 198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222Rn, 202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226Ra, 210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232Th, 218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234U(α); calculated T1/2 using CPPM (Coulomb and Proximity Potential Model); deduced T1/2 vs mass number. Compared with data and published calculations.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.11.014
2018HO04 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E27, 1850022 (2018) Theoretical approaches on the α-decay of spherical Bismuth isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 187,189,191,193,195,209,211,212,213,214Bi(α); calculated Q-value, T1/2. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301318500222
2018SA41 Phys.Rev. C 98, 024625 (2018) K.P.Santhosh, C.Nithya, H.Hassanabadi, D.T.Akrawy α-decay half-lives of superheavy nuclei from a modified generalized liquid-drop model RADIOACTIVITY 257,268,269,271Sg, 262,263,270,271,272,274Bh, 261,262,273,275Hs, 266,267,275,276,278Mt, 265,266,277,279,281Ds, 272,274,278,279,280,281,282Rg, 271,279,281,283,285Cn, 279,281,282,283,284,285,286Nh, 283,284,285,286,287,288,289Fl, 286,292,287,288,289,290Mc, 287,288,290,291,292,293Lv, 290,292,293,294Ts, 291,292,294Og(α); 296,297119, 295,300120, 304,306121, 301,306122, 310,312123, 307,312124, 316,318125, 313,320126, 320,322127, 319,320128, 326,327129, 324,325130, 334,336131, 331,332132, 329,330133, 333,334134(α); calculated half-lives using the generalized liquid-drop model (GLDM) with 1977 nuclear proximity potential proposed by Blocki et al. Comparison with available experimental values, and with half-lives using GLDM model of Royer et al.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.024625
2018SO05 Nucl.Phys. A973, 33 (2018) H.Sobhani, H.Hassanabadi, W.S.Chung Investigation of Bohr Hamiltonian in presence of Killingbeck potential using bi-confluent Heun functions NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 112,114,116,118Pd, 114,116Cd, 118Ru, 118,120Xe, 122,124Ba, 150Nd, 152Sm; calculated levels, J, π, dimensionless free parameters for each isotope for the triaxial deformation (Pd, Cd, Ru, Xe) and for the rotational case (Ba, Nd, Sm), staggering in γ-band; B(E2) for gs, γ1, β1 bands. Compared to available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.02.007
2017AL01 Nucl.Phys. A957, 439 (2017) Alternative solution of the gamma-rigid Bohr Hamiltonian in minimal length formalism
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.10.004
2017AL07 Nucl.Phys. A960, 78 (2017) M.Alimohammadi, H.Hassanabadi, S.Zare Investigation of Bohr-Mottelson Hamiltonian in γ-rigid version with position dependent mass NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 98,100,102,104Ru, 102,104,106,108,110,112,114,116Pd, 106,108,110,112,114,116,118,120Cd, 118,120,122,124,126,128,130,132,134Xe, 130,132,134,136,142Ba, 134,136,138Ce, 140,148Nd, 140,142Sm, 142,144,152Gd, 154Dy, 156Er, 186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200Pt; calculated energy levels, J, B(E2) using Bohr-Mottelson Hamiltonian in γ-rigid version with position dependent mass. Compared to available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.01.003
2017AL26 Eur.Phys.J. A 53, 129 (2017) Investigation of the spectroscopy properties of deformed nuclei by combining the X(3) and E(5) models NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 100,104Ru, 110,112,114,116Pd, 118,120,126,128Xe; calculated gs, first β-band, first γ-band energy, J, B(E2) using model composed of part related to special critical points E(5) (phase transition between spherical oscillator and γ-soft) and X(3) (γ-rigid version of X(5)). Compared to data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2017-12319-1
2017AL28 Nucl.Phys. A966, 34 (2017) Investigation of the hybrid model with the Killingbeck potential in a variational approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 104,108Ru, 118,120Xe, 132,148Ce, 150Nd, 154Sm, 156Gd; calculated states, J, π, transition rates, B(E2) using hybrid collective model with β-dependent Killingbeck potential and γ-dependent oscillator potential. Compared with other calculations and with data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.05.090
2017AL32 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E26, 1750054 (2017) The X(3) model for the modified Davidson potential in a variational approach NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 102Mo, 104,106,108Ru, 120,122,124,126Xe, 132,134Ce, 148Nd, 152Sm, 184,186,188Pt; calculated energy spectra, B(E2) and energy ratios. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301317500549
2017AR17 Can.J.Phys. 95, 1086 (2017) Study of ground state binding energies of the single Ξ and Λ hypernuclei by using numerical computation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 28Al, 32S, 40Ca, 51V, 53Cr, 64Cu, 73Ge, 76As, 81Se, 81Kr, 89Y, 94Zr, 104Rh, 139La, 208Pb; calculated ground state binding for lambda hypernuclei. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1139/cjp-2017-0011
2017HA20 Nucl.Phys. A966, 82 (2017) H.Hassanabadi, H.Sobhani, A.N.Ikot Investigation of energy and B(E2) transition rates for Bohr Hamiltonian with generalized Davidson potential NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 108,114Pd, 116Te, 122,124Xe, 130,132Ba, 156,158,160Gd, 158,166Dy, 164Er, 192Pt; calculated rotational bands (ground band, γ1, β1 band) state energy, J, π, transition rates B(E2) using Bohr Hamiltonian with both original and generalized Davidson potential.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.05.103
2017HO09 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E26, 1750024 (2017) S.S.Hosseini, H.Hassanabadi, S.Zarrinkamar Alpha decay half-lives for heavy and super-heavy isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 209,211,212,213,214Bi, 200,201,202,204,206,208,210,211,214,216,218Po, 202At, 220,223,224,226Ra, 224,226,228,230,232Th, 228,230,232,234,236,238U, 279,280Rg, 285Cn, 282Nh, 286,288Fl, 293Lv, 294Og(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301317500240
2017HO11 Chin.Phys.C 41, 064101 (2017) Theoretical approaches to alpha decay half-lives of super-heavy nuclei RADIOACTIVITY 267Rf, 271Sg, 275Hs, 279,281Ds, 282,283,284,285Cn, 286,287,288,289Fl, 290,291,292,293Lv, 294Og(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/064101
2017HO23 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E26, 1750069 (2017) S.S.Hosseini, H.Hassanabadi, H.Sobhani Estimation of the alpha decay of Platinum isotopes using different versions of theoretical formula RADIOACTIVITY 166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184Pt, 186,188,190,192,194,196,198Pt(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301317500690
2017IK01 Nucl.Phys. A963, 1 (2017) A.N.Ikot, H.Sobhani, H.Hassanabadi Study of energy and B(E2) transition rates for Davydov-Chaban Hamiltonian with generalized Davidson potential NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 112,114,116Pd, 192,194,196Pt; calculated levels, J, π, rotational bands, B(E2) using Davydov-Chaban Hamiltonian with Davidson and generalized Davidson potential and assuming triaxial shape. Compared with data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.03.010
2017NA13 Eur.Phys.J.Plus 132, 171 (2017) Bohr Hamiltonian with hyperbolic Poschl-Teller potential for triaxial nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 98,100,102Ru; calculated energy spectra, B(E2). Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2017-11445-5
2017RA19 Eur.Phys.J. A 53, 187 (2017) Decay properties of charm and bottom mesons in a quantum isotonic nonlinear oscillator potential model
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2017-12374-6
2017SO01 Nucl.Phys. A957, 177 (2017) Electric quadrupole transitions for some isotopes of Xenon; considering rigidity for γ = 30 degrees collective parameter NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 128,130,132Xe; calculated levels, B(E2) using Davydov-Chaban Hamiltonian with Davidson potential. Compared with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.08.009
2016AR04 Can.J.Phys. 94, 365 (2016) Mass chains of light hypernuclei and separation energies of mirror hypernuclei from BWMH mass formula NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3,4H, 9,11Be, 11C, 15N, 15,16O; calculated hypernuclei masses, neutron- and proton-separation energies.
doi: 10.1139/cjp-2015-0616
2016HO23 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E25, 1650109 (2016) S.S.Hosseini, H.Hassanabadi, S.Zarrinkamar Optimal temperature for alpha-decay half-lives with Yukawa proximity potential RADIOACTIVITY 151Dy, 155Yb, 157Hf, 159W, 155Er, 191Pb, 155,156Lu, 154Ho, 154,156Tm, 158,160Ta, 160,162Re, 177,179,181Tl, 188,192,193,195,199,201,205,207Po, 196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,207,208,209At, 201,207Rn, 200,204,205,206,207,208Fr(α); calculated T1/2 for excited states; deduced temperature. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301316501093
2016NE01 Nucl.Phys. A945, 80 (2016) H.Neyazi, A.A.Rajabi, H.Hassanabadi Exactly separable Bohr Hamiltonian with the Killingbeck potential for triaxial nuclei
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.08.007
2016SA54 Eur.Phys.J. A 52, 346 (2016) K.Saeedi, H.Hassanabadi, S.Zarrinkamar Spin-zero DKP equation with two time-dependent interactions
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16346-0
2015DA09 Eur.Phys.J. A 51, 69 (2015) M.Darroodi, H.Hassanabadi, N.Salehi The modified Woods-Saxon potential in the Duffin-Kemmer-Petiau equation
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2015-15069-0
2015SA33 Eur.Phys.J. A 51, 100 (2015) Scattering amplitude of the Duffin-Kemmer-Petiau equation for the Yukawa potential for J = 0
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2015-15100-6
2013HA05 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E22, 1350007 (2013) H.Hassanabadi, E.Javadimanesh, S.Zarrinkamar Alpha decay half-lives for Pt isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190Pt(α); calculated T1/2, nuclear radii. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301313500079
2013HA09 Chin.Phys.C 37, 044101 (2013) H.Hassanabadi, E.Javadimanesh, S.Zarrinkamar, H.Rahimov An angle-dependent potential and alpha-decay half-lives of deformed nuclei for 67≤Z≤91 RADIOACTIVITY 152,154Ho, 156Lu, 159,160Ta, 153Tm, 156Hf, 158W, 163,165Re, 166,167,169Ir, 172Pt, 170,173,177Au, 176Hg, 177,179,181Tl, 180Pb, 188,192,193,197,199,201Po, 198,200,202At, 195,197,199,201,203Rn, 201,202,203,204,206Fr, 203,205,207Ra, 206,208Ac, 174Ir, 183,185,187Pb, 186,191,193,194,195Bi, 216Ac(α); calculated T1/2. Angle-dependent potential, comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/4/044101
2013HA38 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E22, 1350080 (2013) Analytic solution for the potential barriers in alpha-decay process for Po isotopes RADIOACTIVITY 190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,210,212,213,214,215,216,218Po(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301313500808
2013JA10 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E22, 1350051 (2013) An analysis of 178Pb to 238U isotopes with the universal and Yukawa proximity potentials NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=82-92; calculated nuclear structure parameters, decay constant. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301313500511
2013JA16 Chin.Phys.C 37, 114102 (2013) E.Javadimanesh, H.Hassanabadi, A.A.Rajabi, H.Rahimov, S. Zarrinkamar Investigation of deformed nuclei with a new potential combination RADIOACTIVITY 152,154Ho, 156Lu, 159,160Ta, 153Tm, 156Hf, 158W, 163,165Re, 166,167,169Ir, 172Pt, 170,173,177Au, 176Hg, 173,179,181Tl, 180Pb, 188,192,193,197,199,201Po, 198,200,202At, 195,197,199,201,203Rn, 201,202,203,204,206Fr, 203,205,207Ra, 206,208Ac, 217Pa, 174Ir, 183,185,187Pb, 186,191,193,194,195Bi, 216Ac, 214Rn, 212,214,216Po, 216,218,220Ra, 218,222Th, 222U, 250,252,254Fm, 256Rf(α); calculated T1/2. Yukawa potential, comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/11/114102
2012JA09 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E21, 1250027 (2012) E.Javadimanesh, H.Hassanabadi, A.A.Rajabi, H.Rahimov, S.Zarrinkamar Half-lives of bismuth deformed isotopes in multiple approximation basis RADIOACTIVITY 187,189,191,193,195,197,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,211,212,213,214Bi(α); analyzed available data; calculated T1/2. Angle-dependent potentials.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301312500279
2012JA14 Chin.Phys.C 36, 964 (2012) E.Javadimanesh, H.Hassanabadi, A.A.Rajabi, H.Rahimov, S.Zarrinkamar Half-life of bismuth isotopes predicted by the Coulomb and proximity potential model; a proposition for the spherical nuclei RADIOACTIVITY 187,189,191,193,195,197,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,211,212,213,214Bi(α); calculated T1/2. Coulomb and proximity potential model, comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/36/10/008
2012JA15 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E21, 1250094 (2012) E.Javadimanesh, H.Hassanabadi, A.A.Rajabi, H.Rahimov, S.Zarrinkamar Half-lives with Yukawa proximity potential for alpha-decay process RADIOACTIVITY 155Lu, 151Dy, 152Ho, 154Tm, 155Yb, 156Lu, 157Hf, 158Ta, 159W, 160Re, 154Ho, 155Er, 156Tm, 160Ta, 162Re, 177Tl, 179Tl, 181Tl, 191Pb, 188,192,193,195,199,201,205,207Po, 196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,207,208,209At, 201,207Rn, 200,204,205,206,207,208Fr, 254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268Rf, 258,260,262,264,266,268,270,272Sg, 264,266,268,270,272,274,276Hs, 268,270,272,274,276,278,280Ds, 278,280,282,284Cn, 286,288Fl, 290,292Lv(α); calculated T1/2; deduced hindrance factor parameter as a ratio of theoretical to experimental T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301312500942
2011HA57 Phys.Rev. C 84, 064003 (2011) H.Hassanabadi, B.H.Yazarloo, S.Zarrinkamar, A.A.Rajabi Duffin-Kemmer-Petiau equation under a scalar Coulomb interaction
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.064003
2009HA23 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E18, 1497 (2009) H.Hassanabadi, A.A.Rajabi, M.M.Shojaei Hyperspherical approach to study the Schrodinger equation for an N-particle system
doi: 10.1142/S0218301309013658
2009ZA04 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E18, 1781 (2009) S.Zarrinkamar, H.Hassanabadi, A.A.Rajabi Mass terms in CP-conserving Weinberg three-Higgs-doublet model
doi: 10.1142/S021830130901383X
Back to query form |