NSR Query Results

Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 27, 2024.

Search: Author = V.Zanganah

Found 14 matches.

Back to query form

2023SA51      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E32, 2350047 (2023)

K.P.Santhosh, D.T.Akrawy, T.A.Jose, Ali H.Ahmed, H.Hassanabadi, S.S.Hosseini, V.Zanganah, L.Sihver

A systematic study of α-decay half-lives for Ac, Th, Pa, U and Np isotopes with A = 205-245 using the modified generalized liquid drop model

RADIOACTIVITY ^{205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237}Ac, ^{208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239}Th, ^{211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241}Pa, ^{214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243}U, ^{219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245}Np(α); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1142/S0218301323500477
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023ZA01      Nucl.Phys. A1029, 122561 (2023)

V.Zanganeh, S.S.Hosseini, A.M.Izadpanah

Theoretical calculation of alpha decay half-lives of Neptunium nuclei using modified generalized liquid drop model

RADIOACTIVITY ^{219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239}Np(α); calculated T_1/2 using the generalized liquid-drop model (GLDM) with 1977 nuclear proximity potential suggested by Blocki et al. (1977). Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122561
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020IZ01      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E29, 2050095 (2020)

A.M.Izadpanah, S.S.Hosseini, V.Zanganeh

Theoretical cluster decay predictions for the nuclei ^245-260Md with different nuclear potentials

RADIOACTIVITY ^{245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260}Md(α), (⁸Be), (¹²C), (¹⁶O), (²⁰Ne), (²⁴Mg), (²⁸Si), (³²S), (³⁶Ar), (⁴⁰Ca); calculated T_1/2 within the nuclear potentials generalized liquid drop model (GLDM) and also within GLDM with modified different nuclear potentials, namely proximity potential 2010, 1977, 1988, 2000 and 2002. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1142/S0218301320500950
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020ZA03      Nucl.Phys. A997, 121714(2020)

V.Zanganah, D.T.Akrawy, H.Hassanabadi, S.S.Hosseini, S.Thakur

Calculation of α-decay and cluster half-lives for ^197-226Fr using temperature-dependent proximity potential model

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121714
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019GH06      Nucl.Phys. A990, 47 (2019)

R.Gharaei, A.Hadikhani, V.Zanganeh

An explanation for the anomaly problem of diffuseness parameter of the nucleus-nucleus potential in heavy-ion fusion reactions: A possible thermal solution

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.06.003
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019ZA10      Nucl.Phys. A992, 121637 (2019)

V.Zanganeh, R.Gharaei, A.M.Izadpanah

Comparative study for different nuclear proximity potentials applied to quasi-elastic scattering and fusion reactions

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.121637
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2018GH06      Nucl.Phys. A979, 237 (2018)

R.Gharaei, V.Zanganeh, N.Wang

Systematic study of proximity potentials for heavy-ion fusion cross sections

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁴Mg(³⁴S, x), E(cm)=24-33 MeV;³⁰Si(²⁸Si, x), E(cm)=25-37 MeV;⁴⁰Ca(⁴⁰Ca, x), E(cm)=47-66 MeV;⁴⁸Ti(⁴⁰Ca, x), E(cm)=53-85 MeV;³²S(²⁴Mg, x), E(cm)=26-33 MeV;⁵⁴Fe(³⁵Cl, x), E(cm)=55-82 MeV;⁷²Ge(¹⁶O, x), E(cm)=30-52 MeV;¹⁸⁶W(¹⁶O, x), E(c)=62-98 MeV;⁹²Zr(²⁸Si, x), E(cm)=63-90 MeV;¹⁴⁴Sm(¹⁶O, x), E(cm)=56-90 MeV; calculated fusion σ using EBDM (Empirical Barrier Distribution Model) with different proximity potentials and also using coupled channels; compared with data; deduced the best of 14 tested proximity potentials.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.09.032
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2017ZA04      Phys.Rev. C 95, 034620 (2017)

V.Zanganeh, R.Gharaei, N.Wang

Dynamical explanation for the anomaly in the diffuseness parameter of the nucleus-nucleus potential in heavy-ion fusion reactions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁴⁶Ti(⁴⁰Ca, X), E(cm)=65, 75 MeV; calculated time evolution of density distribution. ⁹²Zr(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=45, 50, 55, 60 MeV; ⁹²Zr(²⁸Si, X), E(cm)=70, 75, 80, 85 MeV; calculated dynamical nucleus-nucleus potentials. ⁹²Zr(¹²C, X), E(cm)=28-43 MeV; ⁹²Zr(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=37-65 MeV; ⁹²Zr(²⁸Si, X), E(cm)=65-90 MeV; ⁹²Zr(³⁵Cl, X), E(cm)=77-105 MeV; ⁴⁶Ti(⁴⁰Ca, X), E(cm)=54-80 MeV; ¹⁵⁴Sm(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=52-75 MeV; calculated fusion σ(E), diffuseness parameter as a function of incident energy. Improved quantum molecular dynamics (ImQMD) model. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.034620
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2016GH04      Nucl.Phys. A952, 28 (2016)

R.Gharaei, V.Zanganeh

Temperature-dependent potential in cluster-decay process

RADIOACTIVITY ²²¹Fr, ^{221,222,223,224,226}Ra, ²²⁵Ac, ^224,226Th(¹⁴C);^226,228Th(¹⁸O);²³¹Pa(²³F);^230,232Th, ²³¹Pa, ^{230,232,233,234}(²⁴Ne);²³³U(²⁵Ne);²³²Th, ^234,236U(²⁶Ne);²³⁶Pu(²⁸Mg);²³⁷Np, ²³⁸Pu(³⁰Mg);²⁴¹Am, ²⁴²Cm(³⁴Si); calculated minimum angular momentum, temperature, T_1/2; deduced proximity potential Hf parameter. T_1/2 compared to data. Z=56-104; calculated T_1/2; deduced temperature dependence of emission of ²⁶Mg and ²⁸Mg clusters on parent mass for Np decays. T_1/2 compared with published ASAF approach. WKB approximation with two different proximity 2010 potentials.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.04.001
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2014ZA07      Nucl.Phys. A929, 94 (2014)

V.Zanganeh, N.Wang

Temperature-dependent potential in alpha-decay process

RADIOACTIVITY Pb, Po, Rn, Ra(α); calculated T_1/2 for even-even isotopes. ^220,227Th, ²³¹Np, ²⁴⁶Es(α); calculated T_1/2 vs temperature. A=150-266(α); calculated T_1/2; deduced temperature of parent nuclei. Temperature dependent proximity potential.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.06.001
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2013GO15      Chin.Phys.Lett. 30, 102502 (2013)

M.Golshanian, O.N.Ghodsi, R.Gharaei, V.Zanganeh

The Analysis of the Fusion Reaction of two Colliding Nuclei Using the FCC Lattice Model

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁶⁴Ni, ⁹²Zr(²⁸Si, X), ⁶⁰Ni(⁵⁸Ni, X), ⁵⁸Ni(⁴⁸Ti, X), ⁴⁸Ti(⁴⁰Ca, X), ⁴⁶Ti(⁴⁶Ti, X), E<120 MeV; calculated fusion cross sections based on the FCC+CDM3Y6 model. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/30/10/102502
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2012ZA02      Phys.Rev. C 85, 034601 (2012)

V.Zanganeh, N.Wang, O.N.Ghodsi

Dynamical nucleus-nucleus potential and incompressibility of nuclear matter

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁰⁸Pb(⁴⁸Ca, X), E(cm)=179, 200, 205 MeV; calculated time evolution of density distribution, dynamical nucleus-nucleus potential, nuclear potential. ²⁰⁸Pb(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=70-110 MeV; calculated fusion excitation function, dynamical nucleus-nucleus potential. ¹⁹⁷Au(¹⁹⁷Au, X), ⁴⁰Ca(⁴⁰Ca, X), E=35 MeV/nucleon; calculated fragment charge distribution. Improved quantum molecular-dynamics (ImQMD) model using several interactions. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.034601
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2010GH04      Nucl.Phys. A846, 40 (2010)

O.N.Ghodsi, V.Zanganeh

The effect of the nuclear state equation on the surface diffuseness parameter of the Woods-Saxon potential in the heavy ion fusion reactions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁹²Zr(¹²C, X), E(cm)=28-41 MeV; ⁹²Zr(¹⁶O, X), E(cm)=37-70 MeV; ⁹²Zr(²⁸Si, X), E(cm)=65-88 MeV; ⁹²Zr(³⁵Cl, X), E(cm)=75-98 MeV; calculated complete fusion σ, intranuclear potential and barrier distribution.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.06.005
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2009GH03      Phys.Rev. C 79, 044604 (2009)

O.N.Ghodsi, V.Zanganeh

Calculation of the total potential between two deformed heavy ion nuclei using the Monte Carlo method and M3Y nucleon-nucleon forces

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁴⁶Ti(⁴⁶Ti, X), E not given; ²³⁸U(⁴⁸Ca, X), E not given; ⁷⁰Ge(²⁷Al, X), E not given; calculated height and location of fusion barriers, densities of participating nuclei using Monte Carlo simulation and double- folding model calculations.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.79.044604
Citations: PlumX Metrics