NSR Query Results

Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 29, 2024.

Search: Author = M.Tamkas

Found 3 matches.

Back to query form

2020MU11      Phys.Rev. C 102, 014317 (2020)

M.Muscher, J.Wilhelmy, R.Massarczyk, R.Schwengner, M.Grieger, J.Isaak, A.R.Junghans, T.Kogler, F.Ludwig, D.Savran, D.Symochko, M.P.Takacs, M.Tamkas, A.Wagner, A.Zilges

High-sensitivity investigation of low-lying dipole strengths in ¹²⁰Sn

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹²⁰Sn(γ, γ'), E=9.5 MeV bremsstrahlung beam; measured Eγ, Iγ, γ(θ) using four HPGe detectors at the γELBE facility of Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf. ¹²⁰Sn; deduced levels, pygmy dipole resonances (PDR), J, π, Γ₀²/Γ, photoabsorption σ(Eγ), B(E1), Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn sum rule using statistical model with constant-temperature level density. Comparison with experimental results for ¹²⁰Sn(p, p').

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.014317
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetG0081. Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.

2020WI09      Phys.Rev. C 102, 044327 (2020)

J.Wilhelmy, M.Muscher, G.Rusev, R.Schwengner, R.Beyer, M.Bhike, P.Erbacher, F.Fiedler, U.Friman-Gayer, J.Glorius, R.Greifenhagen, S.Hammer, T.Hensel, J.Isaak, A.R.Junghans, Krishichayan, B.Loher, S.E.Muller, N.Pietralla, S.Reinicke, D.Savran, P.Scholz, K.Sonnabend, T.Szucs, M.Tamkas, W.Tornow, S.Turkat, A.Wagner, A.Zilges

Dipole response of ⁸⁷Rb and its impact on the ⁸⁶Rb (n, γ) ⁸⁷Rb cross section

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁸⁷Rb(γ, γ'), E=8.2, 13.2 MeV bremsstrahlung beam; measured Eγ, Iγ, γ(θ) using four HPGe detectors at the γ-ELBE facility in Dresden. ⁸⁷Rb(polarized γ, γ'), E=5.10, 5.30, 5.50, 5.75, 6.00, 6.25, 6.50, 6.75, 7.00, 7.25, 7.50, 7.80, 8.10, 8.40, 8.70, 9.00, 9.30, 9.60 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, azimuthal asymmetry using four LaBr₃:Ce scintillators and four HPGe detectors at the HIγS facility of TUNL; deduced energy-integrated σ(excitation energy), γ-ray sum spectra, photoabsorption σ(E), E1-photon strength functions (PSFs), nuclear level densities (NLDs), Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn (TRK) sum rule. Comparison with QRPA calculations for PSFs, and microscopic Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov calculations with Skyrme and Gogny forces for NLDs. ⁸⁷Rb; deduced 256 discrete levels from 845 to 10005 keV, J, π, gΓ₀²/Γ, γ-ray branching ratios for selected levels, as listed in supplemental material. ⁸⁶Rb(n, γ), kT=5-100 keV; deduced Maxwellian cross sections (MACSs) for different PSF and NLD inputs, and compared to data in KADoNiS database.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.044327
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetL0266.

2019TA11      Nucl.Phys. A987, 79 (2019)

M.Tamkas, E.Aciksoz, J.Isaak, T.Beck, N.Benouaret, M.Bhike, I.Boztosun, A.Durusoy, U.Gayer, Krishichayan, B.Loher, N.Pietralla, D.Savran, W.Tornow, V.Werner, A.Zilges, M.Zweidinger

Low-lying dipole strength in the well-deformed nucleus ¹⁵⁶Gd

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁵⁶Gd(γ, γ), E=7.1 MeV[bremsstrahlung end-point energy]; measured Eγ, Iγ using three HPGe with BGO active anti-Compton shield; deduced γ-ray energy spectra; ¹⁵⁶Gd(polarized γ, γ), E=2.9-6.2 MeV[linearly polarized quasi-monochromatical photon beams from laser Compton backscattering]; measured Eγ, Iγ, γγ-coin at High Intensity γ-ray Source (HIγS) at TUNL; deduced γ-ray measured and deconvoluted energy spectra, asymmetries for observed single states and average asymmetry for each beam energy setting using deconvoluted spectra, expectation B(E1), B(M1) transition values; deduced, extracted photo absorption σ_γ vs E^* and its decomposition to the gs and to the first excited state.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.03.014
Citations: PlumX Metrics