NSR Query Results

Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 27, 2024.

Search: Author = H.M.Liu

Found 15 matches.

Back to query form

2024ZH20      Chin.Phys.C 48, 044102 (2024)

D.-M.Zhang, X.-Y.Hu, L.-J.Qi, H.-M.Liu, M.Li, X.-H.Li

Theoretical calculations of proton emission half-lives based on a deformed Gamow-like model

RADIOACTIVITY ^108,109I, ^112,113Cs, ¹¹⁷La, ¹²¹Pr, ¹³⁵Tb, ¹⁴¹Ho(p); calculated proton emission T_1/2 with deformed Gamow-like model, where the deformation effect was included in the Coulomb potential. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad243d
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022LI46      Phys.Rev. C 106, 025801 (2022)

H.-M.Liu, J.Zhang, Z.-H.Li, J.-B.Wei, G.F.Burgio, H.-J.Schulze

Microscopic nuclear equation of state at finite temperature and stellar stability

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.025801
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022XU04      Eur.Phys.J. A 58, 16 (2022)

Y.-Y.Xu, H.-M.Liu, D.-X.Zhu, X.Pan, Y.-T.Zou, X.-H.Li, P.-C.Chu

An improved formula for the favored α decay half-lives

RADIOACTIVITY ^146,148Sm, ^148,150,152Gd, ^150,152,154Dy, ^152,154,156Er, ^154,156Yb, ^{156,158,160,162}Hf, ¹⁷⁴Hf, ^{158,160,162,164,166,168}W, ¹⁸⁰W, ^{162,164,166,168,170,172,174}Os, ¹⁸⁶Os, ^{166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190}Pt, ^{170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188}Hg, ^{178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194}Pb, ²¹⁰Pb, ^{186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218}Po, ^{194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222}Rn, ^{202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226}Ra, ^{208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232}Th, ^{218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238}U, ^{230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244}Pu, ^{234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248}Cm, ^{238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254}Cf, ^244,246Fm, ^252,254,256No, ^256,258Rf, ²⁶⁰Sg, ^266,268,270Hs, ²⁷⁰Ds, ²⁸²Ds, ²⁸⁶Cn, ^286,288Fl, ^290,292Lv, ²⁹⁴Og, ^105,107,109Te, ¹¹³I, ^109,111Xe, ¹⁴⁵Pm, ¹⁴⁷Sm, ¹⁴⁷Eu, ^149,151Gd, ^151,153Dy, ^151,153Ho, ^153,155Er, ^153,155,157Tm, ¹⁵⁵Yb, ^155,157Lu, ^157,159,161Hf, ^157,159,161Ta, ^{159,161,163,165,167}W, ^{159,161,163,165}Re, ^{161,163,165,167,169,171,173}Os, ^{165,167,169,171,173}Ir, ¹⁷⁷Ir, ^{165,167,169,171,173}Pt, ¹⁷⁷Pt, ^181,183,185Pt, ^{171,173,175,177,179,181,183,185}Au, ^173,175Hg, ¹⁷⁹Hg, ¹⁸³Hg, ¹⁸⁵Hg, ^177,179,181Tl, ^{185,187,189,191}Pb, ^{185,187,189,191,193,195,197}Bi, ^{191,193,195,197,199,201}Po, ^205,207,209Po, ^{213,215,217,219}Po, ¹⁸⁷Po, ^{191,193,195,197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211,213,215,217,219}At, ^{195,197,199,201,203,205,207,209}Rn, ^215,217Rn, ^{197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211,213,215,217,219}Fr, ^201,203,205Ra, ^209,211Ra, ²¹⁷Ra, ^{207,209,211,213,215,217,219,221}Ac, ²²⁷Ac, ^209,211,213Th, ²¹⁹Th, ^{211,213,215,217,219,221,223,225,227,229,231}Pa, ²²¹U, ²²⁹U, ²³³U, ²¹⁹Np, ^223,225Np, ²³³Np, ²³¹Pu, ²³⁵Pu, ²³⁹Pu, ²³³Cm, ^239,241Cf, ²⁴⁵Cf, ²⁵³Cf, ^{241,243,245,247}Es, ^251,253,255Es, ²⁴¹Fm, ²⁴⁷Fm, ²⁵¹No, ^253,255Lr, ²⁵⁹Lr, ²⁶¹Rf, ²⁵⁷Db, ²⁶³Sg, ^263,265Hs, ²⁶⁷Ds, ¹⁴⁸Eu, ^152,154Ho, ^154,156Tm, ^156,158Lu, ¹⁵⁸Ta, ^162,164Re, ^{164,166,168,170,172}Ir, ^{170,172,174,176,178}Au, ¹⁸⁴Au, ¹⁸⁸Bi, ¹⁹⁶Bi, ^{192,194,196,198,200,202}At, ^214,216At, ^256,258,260Rf, ²⁶⁰Sg, ^262,264Hs, ^268,270,272Hs, ²⁶⁶Ds, ²⁷⁰Ds, ^276,278Ds, ²⁷⁰Cn, ^280,282Cn, ^284,286,288Fl, ^{288,290,292,294,296}Lv, ^{294,296,298,300,302,304}Og, ^{296,298,300,302,304,306,308}120, ^{302,304,306,308,310,312}122, ^{308,310,312,314,316,318}124, ^{314,316,318,320,322,324,326}126, ^{320,322,324,326,328,330,332}128(α); calculated T_1/2 using the modified Hatsukawa formula. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00666-1
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022ZH39      Chin.Phys.C 46, 044106 (2022)

D.-X.Zhu, H.-M.Liu, Y.-Y.Xu, Y.-T.Zou, X.-J.Wu, P.-C.Chu, X.-H.Li

Two-proton radioactivity within Coulomb and proximity potential model

RADIOACTIVITY ¹⁹Mg, ⁴⁵Fe, ⁴⁸Ni, ⁵⁴Zn, ⁶⁷Kr(2p); calculated T_1/2 using the Coulomb and proximity potential model (CPPM). Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac45ef
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021LI16      Chin.Phys.C 45, 024108 (2021)

H.-M.Liu, Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, J.-L.Chen, B.He, X.-H.Li

New Geiger-Nuttall law for two-proton radioactivity

RADIOACTIVITY ⁶Be, ¹²O, ¹⁶Ne, ¹⁹Mg, ⁴⁵Fe, ⁴⁸Ni, ⁵⁴Zn, ⁶⁷Kr, ²²Si, ²⁶S, ³⁴Ca, ³⁶Sc, ^38,39Ti, ⁴⁰V, ⁴²Cr, ⁴⁷Co, ⁴⁹Ni, ⁵⁶Ga, ^58,59,60Ge, ⁶¹As, ¹⁰N, ²⁸Cl, ³²K, ⁵⁷Ga, ⁶²As, ⁵²Cu, ⁶⁰As(2p); calculated T_1/2 using GLDM, ELDM, the four-parameter empirical formula. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abd01e
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021LI45      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E30, 2150074 (2021)

H.-M.Liu, Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, B.He, X.-H.Li

Systematic study of two-proton radioactivity half-lives based on a modified Gamow-like model

RADIOACTIVITY ¹⁹Mg, ⁴⁵Fe, ⁴⁸Ni, ⁵⁴Zn, ⁶⁷Kr, ²²Si, ²⁶S, ³⁴Ca, ³⁶Sc, ^38,39Ti, ⁴⁰V, ⁴²Cr, ⁴⁷Co, ⁴⁹Ni, ⁵⁸Ga, ^58,59Ge, ⁶¹As, ¹⁰N, ²⁸Cl, ³²K, ⁵⁷Ga, ⁶²As, ⁵²Cu, ⁶⁰As(2p); calculated T_1/2; deduced T_1/2 and Q-values reaction. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1142/S0218301321500749
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021LI67      Phys.Scr. 96, 12522 (2021)

H.-M.Liu, Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, X.-H.Li, X.-J.Wu, B.He

Systematic study of cluster radioactivity half-lives based on a modified Gamow-like model

RADIOACTIVITY ^222,224,226Ra(¹⁴C), ^230,232,234U(²⁴Ne), ^234,236U, ^236,238Pu(²⁸Mg), ²²¹Fr, ^221,223Ra, ²²⁵Ac(¹⁴C), ²³¹Pa, ^233,235U(²⁴Ne), ^233,235U(²⁵Ne); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac3dbc
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021ZO01      Chin.Phys.C 45, 104101 (2021)

Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, X.-H.Li, H.-M.Liu, X.-J.Wu, B.He

Systematic study of two-proton radioactivity with a screened electrostatic barrier

RADIOACTIVITY ⁶Be, ¹²O, ¹⁶Ne, ¹⁹Mg, ⁴⁵Fe, ⁴⁸Ni, ⁵⁴Zn, ⁶⁷Kr(2p); analyzed available data; calculated T_1/2 using five different theoretical models and/or formulas.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac1b96
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021ZO02      Phys.Scr. 96, 075301 (2021)

Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, H.-M.Liu, X.-J.Wu, B.He, X.-H.Li

Systematic studies on a decay half-lives of neptunium isotopes

RADIOACTIVITY ^{219,223,224,225,233,221,222,229,231,235,237,239,220,226,227,228,232,236}Np(α); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/abf795
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020LI27      Chin.Phys.C 44, 094106 (2020)

H.-M.Liu, Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, X.-J.Bao, X.-H.Li

Systematic study of the α decay preformation factors of the nuclei around the Z = 82, N = 126 shell closures within the generalized liquid drop model

RADIOACTIVITY ^{186,188,190,192,194}Po, ^{196,198,200,202,204,206,208}Po, ^{200,202,204,206,208,210,212}Rn, ²⁰⁴Ra, ²⁰⁸Ra, ²¹²Th, ²¹⁴Th, ²¹⁶U, ^178,180Pb, ^{184,186,188,190,192,194}Pb, ²¹⁰Pb, ^{212,214,216,218}Po, ^{214,216,218,220}Rn, ²¹⁶Ra, ²¹⁸Ra, ^216,218,220Th, ²¹⁸U, ^{195,197,199,201,203,205,207}Po, ^{197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211}At, ^195,197Rn, ²⁰³Rn, ^207,209Rn, ^{199,201,203,205,207,209,211,213}Fr, ²⁰³Ra, ²⁰⁹Ra, ^205,207Ac, ²¹¹Ac, ^213,215Pa, ^177,179Tl, ^213,215Po, ²¹⁹Po, ^{213,215,217,219}At, ^215,217Rn, ^215,217,219Fr, ²¹⁷Ra, ^215,217Ac, ²¹⁹Th, ²¹⁹Pa, ²²¹Pa, ²²¹U, ²⁰⁹Bi, ¹⁸⁹Po, ²⁰³Po, ^{205,207,209,211,213}Ra, ²¹⁵Th, ^187,189Pb, ²¹³Bi, ²¹³Rn, ^219,221Rn, ²¹⁵Ra, ²¹⁹Ra, ²¹⁷Th, ¹⁹²At, ^{200,202,204,206,208}At, ²⁰⁰Fr, ^204,206,208Fr, ²⁰⁶Ac, ^214,216,218At, ^216,218Fr, ²¹⁸Ac, ²²⁰Pa, ¹⁸⁶Bi, ^190,192,194Bi, ²¹⁰At, ^210,212Fr, ²¹²Pa, ^210,212,214Bi, ²¹²At, ²¹⁴Fr, ²¹⁶Ac(α); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/44/9/094106
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019LI58      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E28, 1950089 (2019)

H.-M.Liu, J.-Y.Xu, J.-G.Deng, B.He, X.-H.Li

Predictions of α decay half-lives for even-even superheavy nuclei with 104≤ Z ≤ 128 based on two-potential approach within cluster-formation model

RADIOACTIVITY ¹⁴⁴Nd, ^146,148Sm, ^148,150,152Gd, ^150,152,154Dy, ^152,154,156Er, ^154,156,158Yb, ^{156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174}Hf, ^{158,160,162,164,166,168}W, ¹⁸⁰W, ^{162,164,166,168,170,172,174}Os, ¹⁸⁶Os, ^{166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190}Pt, ^{172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188}Hg, ¹⁸⁰Pb, ^{184,186,188,190,192,194}Pb, ²¹⁰Pb, ¹⁹⁰Po, ^{194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218}Po, ^194,196Rn, ^{200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222}Rn, ^202,204Ra, ²⁰⁸Ra, ^{214,216,218,220,222,224,226}Ra, ^{212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232}Th, ^{216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238}U, ^{228,230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244}Pu, ^{234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248,250}Cm, ^{238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256}Cf, ²⁴⁴Fm, ²⁴⁸Fm, ^252,254,256Fm, ^254,256,258No, ^256,258,260Rf, ²⁶⁰Sg, ²⁶⁴Hs, ^268,270Hs, ²⁷⁰Ds, ^286,288Fl, ^290,292Lv, ²⁹⁴Og(α); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1142/S0218301319500897
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2009LI33      Nucl.Technology 168, 354 (2009)

Y.-H.Liu, C.-K.Huang, P.-E.Tsai, A.-Y.Chen, H.-M.Liu, S.-C.Lee, S.-H.Jiang

BNCT Epithermal Neutron Beam Mapping by Using Indirect Neutron Radiography

doi: 10.13182/NT09-A9208
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2006HS01      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 64, 306 (2006)

C.H.Hsieh, H.M.Liu, J.J.Hwang, H.E.Wang, J.J.Kai, F.D.Chen

A simple model for quantification of the radiobiological effectiveness of the ¹⁰B(n, α)⁷Li capture reaction in BNCT

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.08.018
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2001CH94      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 55, 549 (2001)

J.-H.Chao, P.-C.Hsu, H.-M.Liu

Measurement of high dose rates by photon activation of indium foils

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^113,115In(γ, γ'), E=spectrum; measured isomer activation yields; deduced effective σ. Cobalt source, application to dose rate measurement discussed.

doi: 10.1016/S0969-8043(01)00076-8
Citations: PlumX Metrics

1995SA19      J.Phys.(London) G21, 241 (1995)

B.-H.Sa, H.-M.Liu, Y.-M.Zheng, Z.-D.Lu, X.-Z.Zhang

Correlations between Conditional Moments Might not Necessarily Imply Evidence of a Phase Transition in a Diassembly of Hot Nuclei

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ¹⁹⁷Au; calculated disassembly fragment charge distribution; deduced conditional moments correlations related features. Monte Carlo, partition method approaches.

doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/21/2/011
Citations: PlumX Metrics