NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = X.J.Bao Found 33 matches. 2023HU15 Phys.Rev. C 108, 024608 (2023) D.-y.Huo, Z.Wei, K.Wu, C.Han, Y.-n.Han, Y.-x.Wang, P.-q.Zhang, Y.He, X.-j.Bao, Z.-y.Deng, Z.-e.Yao Effect of octupole deformation of fragments on mass-asymmetric yields of fission of actinide nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235,236,238,239U, 232Th, 239,240Pu, 237Np(n, F), E=1-10 MeV; calculated mass distributions of fission fragments, quadrupole and octupole deformations of scission configurations as a function of mass number of the fission fragments, neutron-charge ratio of fragments. Scission-point model with considering octupole deformation of fragments. Comparison to experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024608
2023XI13 Chin.Phys.C 47, 124102 (2023) M.-X.Xiao, X.-J.Bao, Zh.Wei, Z.-E.Yao Bayesian evaluation of energy dependent neutron induced fission yields NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(n, F), E=0.5, 1.6, 3, 5.8 MeV; 243Am(n, F), E=0.5 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced the Bayesian neural network (BNN) approach fission yields.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/acf7b5
2023ZH22 J.Phys.(London) G50, 045101 (2023) Effect of deformation dependence and mirror nucleus corrections energy on multinucleon transfer reaction cross sections NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(136Xe, X), E(cm)=450 MeV; 238U(64Ni, X), E(cm)=307.40 MeV; calculated σ using the dinuclear system (DNS) model, three macroscopic microscopic mass models. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/acb4b2
2023ZH41 Phys.Rev. C 108, 024602 (2023) Exploring the optimal way to produce Z=100-106 neutron-rich nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U(16O, X), E(cm)=70-160 MeV; calculated capture σ(E). 248Cm(18O, 4n), E*=28-60 MeV;248Cm(18O, 5n), E*=40-60 MeV;248Cm(18O, 6n), E*=46-60 MeV;244Pu(22Ne, 5n), E*=40-56 MeV; calculated evaporation residue σ(E). 248Cm(238U, X)239Bk/240Bk/241Bk/242Bk/243Bk/244Bk/245Bk/246Bk/247Bk/248Bk/249Bk/250Bk/251Bk/252Bk/253Bk/254Bk/255Bk/256Bk/257Bk/258Bk/259Bk/260Bk/240Cf/241Cf/242Cf/243Cf/244Cf/245Cf/246Cf/247Cf/248Cf/249Cf/250Cf/251Cf/252Cf/253Cf/254Cf/255Cf/256Cf/257Cf/258Cf/259Cf/260Cf/261Cf/262Cf/263Cf/241Es/242Es/243Es/244Es/245Es/246Es/247Es/248Es/249Es/250Es/251Es/252Es/253Es/254Es/255Es/256Es/257Es/258Es/259Es/260Es/261Es/262Es/263Es/264Es/248Fm/249Fm/250Fm/251Fm/252Fm/253Fm/254Fm/255Fm/256Fm/257Fm/258Fm/259Fm/260Fm/261Fm/262Fm/263Fm/264Fm/265Fm/266Fm/267Fm/250Md/251Md/252Md/253Md/254Md/255Md/256Md/257Md/258Md/259Md/260Md/261Md/262Md/263Md/264Md/265Md/266Md, E(cm)=898.71 MeV; calculated primary and final fragments σ(E). 238U, 244Pu, 248Cm, 249Cf(22O, 2n), (22O, 3n), (22O, 4n), (22O, 5n), (22O, 6n), E*=24-60 MeV; calculated evaporation residue σ(E). 248Cm(238U, X)246Fm/247Fm/248Fm/249Fm/250Fm/251Fm/252Fm/253Fm/254Fm/255Fm/256Fm/257Fm/258Fm/259Fm/260Fm/261Fm/262Fm/263Fm/264Fm/265Fm/253No/254No/255No/256No/257No/258No/259No/260No/261No/262No/263No/264No/265No/266No/267No/258Rf/259Rf/260Rf/261Rf/262Rf/263Rf/264Rf/265Rf/266Rf/267Rf/268Rf/269Rf/265Sg/266Sg/267Sg/268Sg, E(cm)=898.71 MeV; calculated σ(E) of the multinucleon transfer reaction, fusion σ(E). Dinuclear system model (DNS) combined with GEMINI++ for calculating the evaporation residue cross section. Comparison to experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024602
2022BA33 Phys.Lett. B 833, 137307 (2022) Optimal condition for the production of heavy and superheavy neutron-rich isotopes with multinucleon transfer reaction NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(58Ni, X), E(cm)=269.77 MeV; 208Pb(64Ni, X), E(cm)=267.64 MeV; 248Cm(86Kr, X), (136Xe, X), (238U, X), E not given; 208Pb, 198Pt(238U, X), (92Kr, X), (136Xe, X), E not given; calculated target-like fragments (TLFs) σ in the framework of the improved DNS model combined with statistical GEMINI++ model. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137307
2022CH42 Chin.Phys.C 46, 094102 (2022) Possibilities of synthesizing new proton-rich nuclei with 40 ≤ Z ≤ 60 using multinucleon transfer reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 130Te(64Ni, X), E(cm)=184.27 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced mass distributions of final fragments using the DNS model+GEMINI++.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac6ed3
2022HE11 Chin.Phys.C 46, 054102 (2022) C.He, Z.-M.Niu, X.-J.Bao, J.-Y.Guo Research on α-decay for the superheavy nuclei with Z = 118-120 RADIOACTIVITY 269,271Sg, 270,271,272,273,274Bh, 273,275Hs, 274,275,276Mt, 278Mt, 277,279,281Ds, 278,279,280,281,282Rg, 281,283,285Cn, 282,283,284,285,286Nh, 285,286,287,288,289Fl, 287,288,289,290Mc, 290,291,292,293Lv, 293,294Ts, 294Og, 281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304118, 284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306119, 287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308120(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac4c3a
2022MA45 Phys.Rev. C 106, 064316 (2022) L.Ma, H.B.Yang, Z.Y.Zhang, J.C.Pei, M.H.Huang, M.M.Zhang, C.Y.Qiao, X.J.Bao, Y.L.Tian, C.L.Yang, Y.S.Wang, Z.Zhao, X.Y.Huang, S.Y.Xu, W.X.Huang, Z.Liu, X.H.Zhou, Z.G.Gan Attempts to produce new americium isotopes near N=126 NUCLEAR REACTIONS 191,193Ir(40Ar, xn)231Am*/233Am*, E=190-204 MeV; measured reaction products, Eα, (recoils)α-α-α correlated events, using SHANS gas-filled recoil separator, 16 position-sensitive Si-strip detectors (PSSDs) for evaporation residues, and eight side silicon detectors (SSDs) for α particles at the HRIFL-Lanzhou facility. 226,227,228Am; no evidence found for the detection of these nuclides, with upper limits of cross sections determined for the production of the compound nuclei of 231Am and 233Am; discussed nonobservation of new americium isotopes in terms of reduced survival probabilities of compound nuclei 231Am and 233Am due to their low fission barriers at high excitations. NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 226,227,228,229Am; calculated excitation functions for the production of these nuclides in 191,193Ir(40Ar, xn) using the statistical model code HIVAP. 230,231,232,233,234,235,236Am; evaluated shell correction energies and fission barriers from FRDM2012, KTUY2005, and WS2010. 226U, 227Np, 231,233Am; calculated fission barrier heights as functions of excitation energy and quadrupole deformation parameter β2 using microscopic finite-temperature Skyrme Hartree-Fock+BCS theory.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.034316
2022ZH47 Nucl.Phys. A1027, 122510 (2022) Improvement of evaporation residual cross sections for superheavy nuclei using a neural network method NUCLEAR REACTIONS 248Cm(18O, X), 242,244Pu(22Ne, X), 238U(26Mg, X), 249Cf(15N, X), 249Bk(16O, X), 248Cm(19F, X), 241Am(22Ne, X), 238U(30Si, X), 249Cf(18O, X), 248Cm(22Ne, X), 249Bk(22Ne, X), 248Cm(26Mg, X), 238U(36S, X), (34S, X), 226Ra(48Ca, X), 232Th(48Ca, X), 238U(48Ca, X), 237Np(48Ca, X), 239,240,242,244Pu(48Ca, X), 243Am(48Ca, X), 245,248Cm(48Ca, X), 249Bk(48Ca, X), 249Cf(48Ca, X)Rf/Db/Sg/Bh/Ds/Hs/Nh/Cn/Fl/Mc/Lv/Ts/Og, E not given; calculated evaporation residual cross section (ERCS) using the neural network method. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122510
2021HU29 Chin.Phys.C 45, 114104 (2021) D.-Y.Huo, X.Yang, C.Han, C.-Q.Liu, K.Wu, X.-Y.Liu, C.Huang, Q.Xie, Y.He, X.J.Bao Evaluation of pre-neutron-emission mass distributions of neutron-induced typical actinide fission using scission point model NUCLEAR REACTIONS 235,238U, 237Np, 239Pu, 232Th(n, F), E=0.5, 1.08, 2.02, 3.51, 5.04, 15.50 MeV; analyzed available data; calculated pre-neutron-emission mass distributions.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac2298
2021MA17 Chin.Phys.C 45, 024105 (2021) Diffuseness effect and radial basis function network for optimizing α decay calculations RADIOACTIVITY 256Rf, 258Rf, 263Rf, 257,258,259Db, 263Db, 259,260,261,262Sg, 269Sg, 271Sg, 260Bh, 261Bh, 264Bh, 266,267Bh, 270Bh, 272Bh, 274Bh, 264,265,266,267Hs, 270Hs, 273Hs, 268Mt, 274,275,276Mt, 278Mt, 267Ds, 269,270,271Ds, 273Ds, 277Ds, 281Ds, 272Rg, 274Rg, 278,279,280Rg, 281Cn, 285Cn, 278Nh, 282,283,284,285,286Nh, 286,287,288,289Fl, 287,288,289,290Mc, 290,291,292,293Lv, 293,294Ts, 294Og, 252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288Rf, 272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310Fl, 286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312,313,314,315,316119, 292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312,313,314,315,316,317,318120(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abcc5c
2020BA58 Phys.Rev. C 102, 064604 (2020) Influence of the incident energy of the projectile and of different targets on the production of neutron-rich nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 198Pt, 208Pb(136Xe, X), E(cm)=451.0 MeV; calculated mass distributions and transfer cross sections in multinucleon transfer reactions involving removal or addition of protons, and production cross sections for neutron-deficient nuclei and moderately neutron-rich nuclei. Dinuclear system (DNS) model and statistical model code GEMINI++. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.064604
2020LI27 Chin.Phys.C 44, 094106 (2020) H.-M.Liu, Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, X.-J.Bao, X.-H.Li Systematic study of the α decay preformation factors of the nuclei around the Z = 82, N = 126 shell closures within the generalized liquid drop model RADIOACTIVITY 186,188,190,192,194Po, 196,198,200,202,204,206,208Po, 200,202,204,206,208,210,212Rn, 204Ra, 208Ra, 212Th, 214Th, 216U, 178,180Pb, 184,186,188,190,192,194Pb, 210Pb, 212,214,216,218Po, 214,216,218,220Rn, 216Ra, 218Ra, 216,218,220Th, 218U, 195,197,199,201,203,205,207Po, 197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211At, 195,197Rn, 203Rn, 207,209Rn, 199,201,203,205,207,209,211,213Fr, 203Ra, 209Ra, 205,207Ac, 211Ac, 213,215Pa, 177,179Tl, 213,215Po, 219Po, 213,215,217,219At, 215,217Rn, 215,217,219Fr, 217Ra, 215,217Ac, 219Th, 219Pa, 221Pa, 221U, 209Bi, 189Po, 203Po, 205,207,209,211,213Ra, 215Th, 187,189Pb, 213Bi, 213Rn, 219,221Rn, 215Ra, 219Ra, 217Th, 192At, 200,202,204,206,208At, 200Fr, 204,206,208Fr, 206Ac, 214,216,218At, 216,218Fr, 218Ac, 220Pa, 186Bi, 190,192,194Bi, 210At, 210,212Fr, 212Pa, 210,212,214Bi, 212At, 214Fr, 216Ac(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/44/9/094106
2019BA20 Chin.Phys.C 43, 054105 (2019) Possibilities for synthesis of new neutron-deficient isotopes of superheavy nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 252Cf(36S, X), 248Cm(40Ar, X), 244Pu(44Ca, X), E(cm)<180 MeV; calculated fusion and capture σ.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/43/5/054105
2019BA30 Phys.Rev. C 100, 011601 (2019) Possibility to produce 293, 295, 296Og in the reactions 48Ca+249, 250, 251Cf NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U, 239,244Pu, 245,248Cm, 249,250,251Cf(48Ca, xn)282Cn/283Cn/283Fl/284Fl/288Fl/289Fl/289Lv/290Lv/292Lv/293Lv/293Og/294Og/295Og/296Og, E(cm)=180-220 MeV; calculated capture σ(E), evaporation residue σ(E), fusion probability, and potential energy surfaces in 244Pu target using dinuclear system model by taking into account influence of polarization effects and temperature effects on the deformations of projectile-like and target-like densities. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.011601
2019GU31 Phys.Rev. C 100, 054616 (2019) S.Q.Guo, X.J.Bao, H.F.Zhang, J.Q.Li, N.Wang Effect of dynamical deformation on the production distribution in multinucleon transfer reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 208Pb(136Xe, X), E(cm)=526, 617, 450 MeV; 198Pt(136Xe, X), E(cm)=643; calculated potential energy surfaces (PES), σ for mass distribution of primary products, cross sections of target-like fragments with Z=78-86 and Z=50-58, production cross sections of the N=126 isotones as a function of the atomic number; deduced influences of dynamical deformation on the PES and the mass distribution of the multi-nucleon transfer (MNT) reactions. Calculations based on the framework of the dinuclear system concept. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054616
2019MA25 Chin.Phys.C 43, 044105 (2019) N.-N.Ma, H.-F.Zhang, X.-Ju.Bao, H.-F.Zhang Basic characteristics of nuclear landscape by improved Weizsacker-Skyrme-type nuclear mass model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=8-128; calculated binding energies, quadrupole deformations, One-neutron and one-proton separation energies, α and β decay Q-values, pairing gaps. Comparison with Atomic Mass Evaluation (AME2016).
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/43/4/044105
2018ZH03 J.Phys.(London) G45, 025106 (2018) The predictive accuracy of analytical formulas and semiclassical approaches for α decay half-lives of superheavy nuclei RADIOACTIVITY 255,257,259,261Rf, 256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263Db, 259,260,261,263,265,266,271Sg, 261,262,264,266,267,272,274Bh, 264,265,266,267,268,269,270,275Hs, 266,268,270,275,276,278Mt, 267,269,270,271,273,279,281Ds, 272,274,279,280,282Rg, 277,283,285Cn, 278,283,284,285,286Nh, 286,287,288,289Fl, 287,288,288,289,290Mc, 290,291,292,293Lv, 293,294Ts, 294Og(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/aa9fbe
2018ZH17 Phys.Rev. C 97, 044614 (2018) L.Zhu, P.-W.Wen, C.-J.Lin, X.-J.Bao, J.Su, C.Li, C.-C.Guo Shell effects in a multinucleon transfer process NUCLEAR REACTIONS 198Pt(136Xe, X), E(cm)=643, 420 MeV; 208Pb(136Xe, X), E(cm)=450, 526 MeV; 186W(136Xe, X), E(cm)=408 MeV; 186W(150Nd, X), E(cm)=451 MeV; calculated potential energy surfaces, total kinetic energy losses (TKEL), and production σ with and without shell corrections using dinuclear system (DNS) model; deduced shell effects on producing trans-target nuclei. Comparison with experimental values.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044614
2018ZH58 Phys.Rev. C 98, 064307 (2018) Predictions for decay modes for superheavy nuclei Z=118 - 124 RADIOACTIVITY 294Og, 293,294Ts, 290,291,292,293Lv, 287,288,289,290Mc, 285,286,287,288,289Fl, 282,283,284,285,286Nh, 281,282,283,284,285Cn, 278,279,280,281,282Rg, 277,279,281Ds, 274,275,276,277,278Mt, 273,275,277Hs, 270,271,272,274Bh, 269,271Sg, 266,267,268,270Db, 265,267Rf, 301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312124, 300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311123, 295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310122, 294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309121, 289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308120, 288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307119, 283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306Og, 288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299Ts, 285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296Lv, 284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295Mc, 281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292Fl, 280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291Nh, 277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288Cn, 276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287Rg, 273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284Ds, 272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283Mt, 269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280Hs, 268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279Bh, 265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274,275,276Sg, 264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272,273,274Db, 261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271,272Rf(α), (SF); calculated half-lives, and (α/SF) decay modes using a generalized liquid drop model (GLDM) with universal decay law (UDL) for α decay, and generalized Swiatecki's formulas (Bao, KPS and NAVK) for SF decay. Comparison with available experimental values.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.064307
2017BA07 J.Phys.(London) G44, 045105 (2017) X.J.Bao, S.Q.Guo, H.F.Zhang, J.Q.Li Influence of proton shell closure on the evaporation residue cross sections of superheavy nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 249Cf(48Ca, xn)296Og, 248Cf(48Ca, xn)295Og, 245Cf(48Ca, xn)292Og, 249Bk(48Ca, xn)296Ts, 244Pu(48Ca, xn)291Fl, 243Am(48Ca, xn)290Mc, 237Np(48Ca, xn)284Nh, 238U(48Ca, xn)285Cn, E<50 MeV; calculated σ. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/aa53e8
2017LI19 Chin.Phys.C 41, 074106 (2017) J.-H.Liu, S.-Q.Guo, X.-J.Bao, H.-F.Zhang Predictions of decay modes for the superheavy nuclei most suitable for synthesis RADIOACTIVITY 294Og, 294,293Ts, 293,292,291,290Lv, 290,289,288,287Mc, 289,288,287,286,285Fl, 286,285,284,283,282Nh, 285,284,283,282,281Cn(SF), 298120, 294,290Og, 290,286,294,289,286,285Lv, 286,282,290,285,282,281Fl, 282,278,277Cn, 291,287Ts, 287,283Mc, 279Nh, 275Rg, 271Mt, 267Bh(SF), (α), 284,283Mc, 280,279Nh, 276,275,276,273Rg, 272,271,272,269,265Mt, 268,267,268,265,261Bh, 264Db, 260Lr, 283,282Fl, 279,278,280,275,274Cn, 275,272,270,268Ds, 271,268Hs, 280Nh, 264Hs(SF), (α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/7/074106
2017MA48 Phys.Rev. C 96, 024302 (2017) N.N.Ma, H.F.Zhang, P.Yin, X.Ju.Bao, H.F.Zhang Weizsacker-Skyrme-type nuclear mass formula incorporating two combinatorial radial basis function prescriptions and their application NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=10-118, N=10-180; calculated binding energies, odd-even staggering (OES) of nuclear binding energies, S(n), S(2n), S(p), S(2p), Q(α), Q(β-), Q(β+), Q(EC) of 2267 nuclei using WS-LZ, WS-LZ1, and WS-LZ2 mass formulas, and compared with experimental values. Z=8, A=26-28; Z=9, A=27-31; Z=10, A=30-34; Z=11, A=33-37; Z=12, A=35-40; Z=13, A=21, 22, 38-43; Z=14, A=22, 23, 40-45; Z=15, A=24-26, 42-47; Z=16, A=26-28, 45-49; Z=17, A=28-30, 44, 46-51; Z=18, A=30, 31, 48-53; Z=19, A=32-34, 52-56; Z=20, A=34, 35, 53-58; Z=21, A=36-38, 53-61; Z=22, A=38-40, 55, 57-63; Z=23, A=40-42, 44, 56, 57, 59-66; Z=24, A=42-44, 58-60, 63-68; Z=25, A=44-46, 48, 62, 67-71; Z=26, A=45-48, 67-74; Z=27, A=47-49, 52, 69-76; Z=28, A=48-52, 74-79; Z=29, A=52-56, 77-82; Z=30, A=54-57, 82-85; Z=31, A=56-60, 84-87; Z=32, A=58-62, 86-90; Z=33, A=60-64, 88-92; Z=34, A=64-66, 90-95; Z=35, A=67, 68, 93-98; Z=36, A=69, 70, 98-101; Z=37, A=71-73, 100-103; Z=38, A=73-75, 103-107; Z=39, A=76-79, 104-109; Z=40, A=78-82, 106-112; Z=41, A=81-84, 109-115; Z=42, A=83, 84, 112-117; Z=43, A=85, 86, 114-120; Z=44, A=87-89, 117-124; Z=45, A=89-91, 120-126; Z=46, A=91-93, 123-128; Z=47, A=93-95, 124-130; Z=48, A=95-97, 129-133; Z=49, A=97-101, 128, 133-135; Z=50, A=99-101, 136-138; Z=51, A=103, 137-140; Z=52, A=105, 141-143; Z=53, A=107, 114, 140-145; Z=54, A=109, 147, 148; Z=55, A=115, 116, 148-152; Z=56, A=115-120, 149-153; Z=57, A=116-123, 149-155; Z=58, A=119-125, 152-157; Z=59, A=121-127, 154, 156-159; Z=60, A=124-129, 156, 158-161; Z=61, A=126-132, 160-163; Z=62, A=128-135, 162-165; Z=63, A=130-137, 164-167; Z=64, A=133-139, 143, 164-169; Z=65, A=135-140, 142, 165, 167-171; Z=66, A=138-142, 169-173; Z=67, A=140-143, 171-175; Z=68, A=142-145, 173-177; Z=69, A=144-146, 149, 150, 177-179; Z=70, A=148-153, 179-181; Z=71, A=150-154, 181-185; Z=72, A=153-157, 187-189; Z=73, A=155-158, 178, 189-192; Z=74, A=157-161, 192-194; Z=75, A=159-162, 167, 194-198; Z=76, A=161-165, 197-202; Z=77, A=164-166, 170, 198, 200-204; Z=78, A=166-169, 203-206; Z=79, A=169, 170, 174, 204-210; Z=80, A=171-173, 209-216; Z=81, A=178, 190, 212, 214-218; Z=82, A=215-220; Z=83, A=185, 194, 219-224; Z=84, A=223-227; Z=85, A=198, 225-229; Z=86, A=230, 231; Z=87, A=202, 232, 233; Z=88, A=201, 235; Z=89, A=206, 237; Z=90, A=238, 239; Z=91, A=220, 222, 239-241; Z=92, A=217, 220-222, 241-243; Z=93, A=219-224, 226, 232, 242-245; Z=94, A=247; Z=95, A=230-234, 236, 237, 246-249; Z=96, A=232, 235, 252; Z=97, A=234-242, 248, 252-254; Z=98, A=238, 239, 241, 243, 255, 256; Z=99, A=239-246, 248-250, 256-258; Z=100, A=241-245, 247, 258-260; Z=101, A=245-250, 252-254, 256, 259-262; Z=102, A=248-251, 258-264; Z=103, A=251-254, 257-266; Z=104, A=253-255, 259, 260, 262-268; Z=105, A=255-258, 260-270; Z=106, A=258, 259, 263-273; Z=107, A=260-275; Z=108, A=263, 267-273; Z=109, A=265-279; Z=110, A=267, 268, 271-281; Z=111, A=272-283; Z=112, A=276-285; Z=113, A=278-287; Z=114, A=285-289; Z=115, A=287-291; Z=116, A=289-293; Z=117, A=291-294; Z=118, A=293-295; calculated binding energies, Q(α), Q(β-), Q(β+), Q(EC) based on the WS-LZ2 mass formula for 988 nuclei. Weizsacker-Skyrme (WS)-type nuclear mass formulas.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.024302
2016BA20 Phys.Rev. C 93, 044615 (2016) X.J.Bao, Y.Gao, J.Q.Li, H.F.Zhang Possibilities for synthesis of new isotopes of superheavy nuclei in cold fusion reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 209Bi(54Cr, n)262Bh, 208Pb(56Fe, n)263Hs, 208Pb(58Fe, n)265Hs, 209Bi(58Fe, n)266Mt, 208Pb(62Ni, n)269Ds, 207Pb(64Ni, n)270Ds, 208Pb(64Ni, n)271Ds, 209Bi(64Ni, n)272Rg, 208Pb(68Zn, n)275Cn, 208Pb(70Zn, n)277Cn, 209Bi(70Zn, n)278Nh, E not given; calculated evaporation residue cross section (ERCS) for cold fusion reactions and compared with experimental data. 207Pb(58Fe, n), (64Ni, n), (70Zn, n), 208Pb, 209Bi(56Fe, n), (58Fe, n), (59Fe, n), (60Fe, n), (61Fe, n), (58Ni, n), (59Ni, n), (60Ni, n), (61Ni, n), (62Ni, n), (64Ni, n), (65Ni, n), 208Pb(66Zn, n), (67Zn, n), (68Zn, n), (70Zn, n), (71Zn, n), E not given; calculated evaporation residue cross section (ERCS) for cold fusion reactions for production A=262-278, Z=108-112 superheavy nuclides (SHN), isospin dependence. 208Pb(58Mn, n), (61Fe, n), (58Co, n), (65Ni, n), (66Cu, n), (74Ga, n), (78As, n), (85Se, n), (89Br, n), (91Kr, n), 209Bi(66Cu, n), (80Ga, n), E not given; calculated evaporation residue cross section (ERCS) for cold fusion reactions for production of Z=107-118, A=265-298 and compared with other theoretical calculations. 136Xe(136Xe, n)271Hs, E not given; calculated cross section. Dinuclear system (DNS) model via cold fusion reactions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044615
2015BA03 Phys.Rev. C 91, 011603 (2015) X.J.Bao, Y.Gao, J.Q.Li, H.F.Zhang Influence of the nuclear dynamical deformation on production cross sections of superheavy nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 238U, 237Np, 242,244Pu, 245,248Cm, 249Bk, 249,251Cf, 252,254Es(48Ca, 3n), (48Ca, 4n), (48Ca, 5n), at E(compound nucleus)=20-60 MeV; calculated evaporation residue cross sections as function of the excitation energy of the compound nucleus. Z=119, 120; predicted production σ. Calculations based on Dinuclear system with deformations of the two nuclei described by a Fokker-Planck equation. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.011603
2015BA19 Phys.Rev. C 91, 064612 (2015) X.J.Bao, Y.Gao, J.Q.Li, H.F.Zhang Theoretical study of the synthesis of superheavy nuclei using radioactive beams NUCLEAR REACTIONS 244Pu(34S, X), (48Ca, X), E not given; calculated contour plot of driving potential as function of neutron and proton numbers of fragment. 154Sm(40Ca, X)194Pb*, E(*)=56-75 MeV; 154Sm(48Ca, X)202Pb*, E(*)=49-95 MeV; 182W(32S, X)214Th*, E(*)=56-136 MeV; 208Pb(19F, X)227Pa*, E(*)=51-124 MeV; 208Pb(24Mg, X)232Pu*, E(*)=52-114 MeV; 154Sm(40Ca, X)194Pb*, E(*)=56-75 MeV; 208Pb(28Si, X)236Cm*, E(*)=50-138 MeV; 208Pb(32S, X)240Cf*, E(*)=66-111 MeV; 238U(36S, X)274Hs*, E(*)=36-56 MeV; 248Cm(26Mg, X)274Hs*, E(*)=37-64 MeV; calculated fusion probability and compared with experimental values. 249Bk, 252Cf(14N, 3n), (14N, 4n), (14N, 5n), 249Bk(19F, 3n), (19F, 4n), (19F, 5n), 246Cm, 249Bk, 250Cf(30Si, 3n), (30Si, 4n), (30Si, 5n), 252Cf, 253Es(22Ne, 3n), (22Ne, 4n), (22Ne, 5n), 253Es(18O, 3n), (18O, 4n), (18O, 5n), 238U, 237Np, 242,244Pu, 243Am, 245,248Cm, 249Cf, 249Bk(48Ca, 3n), (48Ca, 4n), (48Ca, 5n), 237Np, 244Pu, 248Cm, 249Bk, 252Cf, 253Es(24Na, 4n), (24Na, 5n), 252Cf(21O, 4n), (21O, 5n), 238U, 244Pu(42K, 4n), (42K, 5n), 237Np, 249Bk(43K, 4n), (43K, 5n), 248Cm(46Ar, 4n), (46Ar, 5n), 248Cm, 252Cf, 253Es(46K, 4n), (46K, 5n), E not given; calculated formation σ for evaporation residues and compared with available experimental values and previous calculations. Dinuclear system (DNS) model for the formation of Z=108-118 superheavy (SHE) compound nuclei.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.064612
2015BA24 J.Phys.(London) G42, 085101 (2015) X.J.Bao, S.Q.Guo, H.F.Zhang, Y.Z.Xing, J.M.Dong, J.Q.Li Competition between α-decay and spontaneous fission for superheavy nuclei RADIOACTIVITY 232Th, 234,236,238U, 236,238,240,242,244Pu, 240,242,244,246,248,250Cm, 242,244,246,248,250,252,254Cf, 246,248Fm, 256,258,260Rf, 264,266,270Hs, 270Ds, 284Cn, 286,288Fl, 290,292Lv, 294Og, 235U, 239Pu, 243,245Cm, 237,249Cf, 255,257,259Fm, 253,255,259Rf, 293,294Ts, 287,289,290Mc, 282,283,285,286Nh, 275,278Mt, 271,274Bh, 291,293Lv, 287,289Fl, 283,285Cn, 278,279,280,281,282Rg, 279,281Ds, 274,275,276Mt, 275Hs, 270,272Bh, 266,267,268,270Db(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/42/8/085101
2015BA30 Phys.Rev. C 92, 014601 (2015) X.J.Bao, Y.Gao, J.Q.Li, H.F.Zhang Influence of nuclear basic data on the calculation of production cross sections of superheavy nuclei NUCLEAR REACTIONS 237Np, 238U, 242,244Pu, 243Am, 245,248Cm, 249Cf, 249Bk(48Ca, 3n), (48Ca, 4n), E not given; calculated survival probabilities of superheavy nuclei (SHN) as function of mass number of compound nucleus, and compared with experimental cross sections. 243Am(48Ca, 3n), (48Ca, 4n), (48Ca, 5n), E*(CN)=20-60 MeV; calculated capture cross sections, fusion probabilities, and survival probabilities, evaporation residue cross sections as function of excitation energy leading to nuclei with Z=112-118. 249Cf(50Ti, 3n), (50Ti, 4n), (50Ti, 5n), E*=20-60 MeV; 248Cm(54Cr, 3n), (54Cr, 4n), (54Cr, 5n), E*=20-60 MeV; calculated evaporation residue cross sections as function of excitation energy and Z=120 production. Calculations based on the DNS concept, and use of three nuclear data tables (FRDM-1995, KTUY-2005, WS-2010).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.014601
2015BA42 Phys.Rev. C 92, 034612 (2015) X.J.Bao, Y.Gao, J.Q.Li, H.F.Zhang Isotopic dependence of superheavy nuclear production in hot fusion reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 237Np, 238U, 242,244Pu, 243Am, 245,248Cm, 249Bk, 249Cf(48Ca, 2n), (48Ca, 3n), (48Ca, 4n), (48Ca, 5n), E*=20-60 MeV; calculated evaporation residue cross section (ERCSs) for nuclei of SHE of Z=112-118. 232,233,234,235,236,237,238U, 236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244Pu, 242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250Cm, 249,250,251,252Cf(48Ca, 3n), (48Ca, 4n), (50Ti, 3n), (50Ti, 4n), (50Ca, 3n), (50Ca, 4n), 235,236,237Np, 241,242,243Am, 247,248,249Bk(48Ca, 3n), (48Ca, 4n), (50Ti, 3n), (50Ti, 4n), E not given; calculated evaporation residue cross section (ERCSs) for nuclei of SHE region. Dinuclear system (DNS) model. Comparison with available experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034612
2015MA45 J.Phys.(London) G42, 095107 (2015) N.N.Ma, H.F.Zhang, X.J.Bao, P.H.Chen, J.M.Dong, J.Q.Li, H.F.Zhang Weizsacker-Skyrme-type mass formula by considering radial basis function correction NUCLEAR STRUCTURE N<180; calculated nuclear masses, α-decay Q-values and T1/2. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/42/9/095107
2014BA23 Phys.Rev. C 89, 067301 (2014) X.-J.Bao, H.-F.Zhang, J.-M.Dong, J.-Q.Li, H.-F.Zhang Competition between α decay and cluster radioactivity for superheavy nuclei with a universal decay-law formula RADIOACTIVITY Z=104-120, N=140-202(α); 222,224,226Ra, 228,230Th, 230,232,234U, 236Ra, 240,242Cm, 256,258Rf, 260,262Sg, 264,266Hs, 270Ds(α); calculated branching ratios for α-decay and cluster radioactivity. Comparison with available experimental data. 282Ds(76Zn); 284Ds(78Zn); 286Ds(82Ge); 288Ds(84Ge); 284Cn(76Zn), (80Zn); 286Cn(80Ge), (82Ge); 288Cn(82Ge); 290Cn(82Ge), (84Ge), (86Se); 292Cn(84Se), (88Se); 286Fl(78Ge), (80Ge), (84Se); 288Fl(80Ge), (84Se); 290Fl(82Ge), (84Se); 292Fl(86Se); 294Fl(88Se); 294Fl(88Se); 296Fl(88Se), (92Kr); 298Fl(94Kr); 288Lv(82Se); 288,290,292Lv(84Se); 294Lv(86Se); 288,290,292,294Og(86Kr); 296Og(88Kr); 298Og(90Kr); 290,292,294120(88Sr); 296,298120(90Sr); 300120(92Sr); calculated branching ratios and half-lives for the most probable cluster decay using Universal Decay Law formalism, and AME-2012, FRDM95, KTUV05, and WS2011 mass tables.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.067301
2012BA35 J.Phys.(London) G39, 095103 (2012) X.J.Bao, H.F.Zhang, B.S.Hu, G.Royer, J.Q.Li Half-lives of cluster radioactivity with a generalized liquid-drop model RADIOACTIVITY 221Fr, 221,222,223,224,226Ra, 225Ac, 226Th(14C), 226Th(18O), 228Th(20O), 230Th(24Ne), 232Th(26Ne), 231Pa(24Ne), (23F), 230U(22Ne), (24Ne), 232U(28Mg), (24Ne), 233U(24Ne), (25Ne), (28Mg), 234U(24Ne), (26Ne), (28Mg), 235U(24Ne), (25Ne), (28Mg), 236U, 247Np(30Mg), 236Pu(28Mg), 238Pu(28Mg), (30Mg), (32Si), 220Rn(12C), 221Rn(15N), 222Rn(18O), 223Ra(18O), 226Ra(20O), 225Ac(18O), 224Th(15N), 224Th(24Ne), 226Th(15N), 226,228Th(24Ne), 229Th(21O), (24Ne), 231Pa(27Na), 232Pa(25Ne), (28Mg), 230U(20O), (24Ne), (32Si), 232U(28Mg), 233,234U(27Na), 225Np(12C), (16O), 227Np(16O), (18O), 231Np(20O), 233Np(22Ne), (25Ne), 234Np(28Mg), 235Np(29Mg), 236Np(29Mg), 237Np(32Si), 234Pu(27Na), (29Al), 236Pu(24Ne), (29Al), 237Pu(29Mg), (32Si), 237Am(28Mg), (32Si), 238Am(29Mg), (33Si), 239Am(32Si), (34Si), 240Am(34Si), 241Am(34Si), 238Cm(32Si), 240Cm(30Mg), (34Si), 242Cm(32Si), 243Cm(34Si), 242Cf(32Si), (34Si), 244Cf(34Si), 246Cf(38S), 249Cf(46Ar), (50Ca), 250,252,253,254,255,256,257,258No(48Ca), 258Rf(49Ca), (51Ti), (53Ti); calculated T1/2 for cluster radioactivity. WKB barrier-penetrating probabilities, generalized liquid drop model, comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/39/9/095103
1996BB11 Nucl.Instrum.Methods Phys.Res. A380, 58 (1996) X.J.Bao, M.Natarajan, J.Henderson Low Energy Background in Mercuric Iodide X-Ray Spectrometers RADIOACTIVITY 55Fe(EC); measured K X-ray spectra; deduced spectrometers low energy background related features. Mercury iodide X-ray spectrometers.
doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(96)00328-2
Back to query form |