NSR Query Results

Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 27, 2024.

Search: Author = P.C.Chu

Found 18 matches.

Back to query form

2024LU07      Chin.Phys.C 48, 044105 (2024)

S.Luo, D.-M.Zhang, L.-J.Qi, X.Chen, P.-Ch.Chu, X.-H.Li

α-particle preformation factors in heavy and superheavy nuclei

RADIOACTIVITY ^{220,222,224,226,228,230,232}Th, ^{222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238}U, ^{230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244}Pu, ^{234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248}Cm, ^{238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254}Cf, ^{244,246,248,250,252,254,256}Fm, ^252,254,256No, ^256,258Rf, ²⁶⁰Sg, ^266,268,270Hs, ²⁷⁰Ds, ²⁸²Ds, ²⁸⁶Cn, ^286,288Fl, ^290,292Lv, ²⁹⁴Og(α); calculated T_1/2 using the Two-Potential Approach (TPA); deduced preformation factors. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad21e9
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023CH40      Phys.Rev. C 108, 025808 (2023)

P.-C.Chu, X.-H.Li, H.Liu, M.Ju, Y.Zhou

Properties of isospin asymmetric quark matter in quark stars

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.025808
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023LU06      Eur.Phys.J. A 59, 125 (2023)

S.Luo, L.-J.Qi, D.-M.Zhang, B.He, P.-C.Chu, X.-H.Li

An improved empirical formula of α decay half-lives for superheavy nuclei

RADIOACTIVITY ^234,236,238Cm, ²⁴²Cm, ²⁴⁶Cm, ²³⁸Cf, ²⁴²Cf, ²⁴⁶Cf, ²⁵⁰Cf, ²⁵⁴Cf, ²⁴⁶Fm, ²⁵⁰Fm, ²⁵⁴Fm, ²⁵²No, ²⁵⁶No, ²⁵⁸Rf, ²⁶⁶Hs, ²⁷⁰Hs, ²⁸²Ds, ²⁸⁶Fl, ²⁹⁰Lv, ²⁹⁴Og(α); calculated T_1/2; deduced formula. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01040-5
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023QI06      Phys.Rev. C 108, 014325 (2023)

L.-J.Qi, D.-M.Zhang, S.Luo, G.-Q.Zhang, P.-C.Chu, X.-J.Wu, X.-H.Li

Cluster radioactivity preformation probability of trans-lead nuclei in the N_pN_n scheme

RADIOACTIVITY ²²¹Fr, ^{221,222,223,224,226}Ra, ²²³Ac(¹⁴C);²²⁸Th(²⁰O);²³¹Pa(²³F);²³⁰Th, ²³¹Pa, ^232,233,234U(²⁴Ne);²³³U(²⁵Ne);²³⁴U(²⁶Ne);²³⁴U, ^236,238Pu(²⁸Mg), ²³⁸Pu(³⁰Mg);²³⁸Pu(³²Si);²⁴²Cm(³⁴Si); calculated cluster preformation probability. Comparison of results obtained with unified fission model (model dependent approach), cluster formation model (microscopic approach) and Wei model (analytical formula).

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.014325
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023QI07      Eur.Phys.J. A 59, 255 (2023)

L.-J.Qi, D.-M.Zhang, S.Luo, X.-H.Li, B.He, P.C.Chu

Cluster radioactivity half-lives of trans-lead nuclei with a statistical physical preformation factor

RADIOACTIVITY ²²¹Fr, ^221,222,223Ra, ²²³Ac, ^224,226Ra(¹⁴C), ²²⁸Th(²⁰O), ²³⁰Th(²⁴Ne), ²³¹Pa(²³F), ²³¹Pa, ^232,233U(²⁴Ne), ²³³U(²⁵Ne), ²³⁴U(²⁴Ne), ²³⁶Pu(²⁶Ne), ²³⁸Pu(²⁸Mg); calculated T_1/2 using the cluster preformation probability in statistical physical way and Wentzel-Kramers-Brillouin (WKB) theory. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01162-w
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022CH21      Phys.Rev. C 105, 045806 (2022)

P.-C.Chu, Y.-N.Wang, X.-H.Li, H.Liu, J.-W.Zhang

Strange quark matter at finite temperature under magnetic fields with a quasiparticle model

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.045806
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022CH48      Chin.Phys.C 46, 104104 (2022)

J.-H.Cheng, Z.Zhang, X.-J.Wu, P.-C.Chu, X.-H.Li

Systematic study of proton radioactivity half-lives based on the relationship between Skyrme-Hartree-Fock and the macroscopic quantities of nuclear matter

RADIOACTIVITY ^{144,145,146,147}Tm, ^150,151Lu, ^156,157Ta, ^159,160,161Re, ^{164,165,166,167}Ir, ^170,171Au, ^176,177Tl(p); calculated the spherical proton radioactivity using the relationship between Skyrme parameters and the macroscopic quantities of nuclear matter. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac7a99
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022LU11      Eur.Phys.J. A 58, 244 (2022)

S.Luo, Y.-Y.Xu, D.-X.Zhu, B.He, P.-C.Chu, X.-H.Li

Improved Geiger-Nuttall law for α-decay half-lives of heavy and superheavy nuclei

RADIOACTIVITY ^{220,222,224,226,228,230,232}Th, ^{222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238}U, ^{230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244}Pu, ^{234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248}Cm, ^{238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254}Cf, ^{244,246,248,250,252,254,256}Fm, ^252,254,256No, ^256,258Rf, ²⁶⁰Sg, ^266,268,270Hs, ²⁷⁰Ds, ²⁸²Ds, ²⁸⁶Cn, ^286,288Fl, ²⁹²Lv, ²⁹⁴Og, ^{221,223,225,227,229}Th, ^{221,223,225,227,229,231}Pa, ^{223,225,227,229,231,233}U, ^233,235,237Np, ^{229,231,233,235}Pu, ^{245,247,249,251,253,255}Es, ^{241,243,245,247,249,251,253,255,257}Fm, ^{245,247,249,251,253,255,257}Md, ^{251,253,255,257,259}No, ^{224,226,228,230}Pa, ^{224,226,228,230,232,234,236}Np, ^{234,236,238,240,242}Am, ²³⁴Bk, ^{240,242,244,246}Es, ^{281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312,313,314,315,316,317}Ts, ^{282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312,313,314,315,316,317,318}Og, ^{284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312,313,314,315,316,317,318,319}119, ^{287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312,313,314,315,316,317,318,319,320}120(α); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00898-1
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022XU04      Eur.Phys.J. A 58, 16 (2022)

Y.-Y.Xu, H.-M.Liu, D.-X.Zhu, X.Pan, Y.-T.Zou, X.-H.Li, P.-C.Chu

An improved formula for the favored α decay half-lives

RADIOACTIVITY ^146,148Sm, ^148,150,152Gd, ^150,152,154Dy, ^152,154,156Er, ^154,156Yb, ^{156,158,160,162}Hf, ¹⁷⁴Hf, ^{158,160,162,164,166,168}W, ¹⁸⁰W, ^{162,164,166,168,170,172,174}Os, ¹⁸⁶Os, ^{166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190}Pt, ^{170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188}Hg, ^{178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194}Pb, ²¹⁰Pb, ^{186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218}Po, ^{194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222}Rn, ^{202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226}Ra, ^{208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232}Th, ^{218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238}U, ^{230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244}Pu, ^{234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248}Cm, ^{238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254}Cf, ^244,246Fm, ^252,254,256No, ^256,258Rf, ²⁶⁰Sg, ^266,268,270Hs, ²⁷⁰Ds, ²⁸²Ds, ²⁸⁶Cn, ^286,288Fl, ^290,292Lv, ²⁹⁴Og, ^105,107,109Te, ¹¹³I, ^109,111Xe, ¹⁴⁵Pm, ¹⁴⁷Sm, ¹⁴⁷Eu, ^149,151Gd, ^151,153Dy, ^151,153Ho, ^153,155Er, ^153,155,157Tm, ¹⁵⁵Yb, ^155,157Lu, ^157,159,161Hf, ^157,159,161Ta, ^{159,161,163,165,167}W, ^{159,161,163,165}Re, ^{161,163,165,167,169,171,173}Os, ^{165,167,169,171,173}Ir, ¹⁷⁷Ir, ^{165,167,169,171,173}Pt, ¹⁷⁷Pt, ^181,183,185Pt, ^{171,173,175,177,179,181,183,185}Au, ^173,175Hg, ¹⁷⁹Hg, ¹⁸³Hg, ¹⁸⁵Hg, ^177,179,181Tl, ^{185,187,189,191}Pb, ^{185,187,189,191,193,195,197}Bi, ^{191,193,195,197,199,201}Po, ^205,207,209Po, ^{213,215,217,219}Po, ¹⁸⁷Po, ^{191,193,195,197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211,213,215,217,219}At, ^{195,197,199,201,203,205,207,209}Rn, ^215,217Rn, ^{197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211,213,215,217,219}Fr, ^201,203,205Ra, ^209,211Ra, ²¹⁷Ra, ^{207,209,211,213,215,217,219,221}Ac, ²²⁷Ac, ^209,211,213Th, ²¹⁹Th, ^{211,213,215,217,219,221,223,225,227,229,231}Pa, ²²¹U, ²²⁹U, ²³³U, ²¹⁹Np, ^223,225Np, ²³³Np, ²³¹Pu, ²³⁵Pu, ²³⁹Pu, ²³³Cm, ^239,241Cf, ²⁴⁵Cf, ²⁵³Cf, ^{241,243,245,247}Es, ^251,253,255Es, ²⁴¹Fm, ²⁴⁷Fm, ²⁵¹No, ^253,255Lr, ²⁵⁹Lr, ²⁶¹Rf, ²⁵⁷Db, ²⁶³Sg, ^263,265Hs, ²⁶⁷Ds, ¹⁴⁸Eu, ^152,154Ho, ^154,156Tm, ^156,158Lu, ¹⁵⁸Ta, ^162,164Re, ^{164,166,168,170,172}Ir, ^{170,172,174,176,178}Au, ¹⁸⁴Au, ¹⁸⁸Bi, ¹⁹⁶Bi, ^{192,194,196,198,200,202}At, ^214,216At, ^256,258,260Rf, ²⁶⁰Sg, ^262,264Hs, ^268,270,272Hs, ²⁶⁶Ds, ²⁷⁰Ds, ^276,278Ds, ²⁷⁰Cn, ^280,282Cn, ^284,286,288Fl, ^{288,290,292,294,296}Lv, ^{294,296,298,300,302,304}Og, ^{296,298,300,302,304,306,308}120, ^{302,304,306,308,310,312}122, ^{308,310,312,314,316,318}124, ^{314,316,318,320,322,324,326}126, ^{320,322,324,326,328,330,332}128(α); calculated T_1/2 using the modified Hatsukawa formula. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00666-1
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022ZH39      Chin.Phys.C 46, 044106 (2022)

D.-X.Zhu, H.-M.Liu, Y.-Y.Xu, Y.-T.Zou, X.-J.Wu, P.-C.Chu, X.-H.Li

Two-proton radioactivity within Coulomb and proximity potential model

RADIOACTIVITY ¹⁹Mg, ⁴⁵Fe, ⁴⁸Ni, ⁵⁴Zn, ⁶⁷Kr(2p); calculated T_1/2 using the Coulomb and proximity potential model (CPPM). Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac45ef
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021CH52      Phys.Rev. C 104, 045805 (2021)

P.-C.Chu, X.-H.Li, H.Liu, J.-W.Zhang

Quark matter and quark stars within the quasiparticle model under magnetic fields

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.045805
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021CH57      Eur.Phys.J. A 57, 305 (2021)

J.-L.Chen, X.-H.Li, X.-J.Wu, P.-C.Chu, B.He

Systematic study on proton radioactivity of spherical proton emitters within two-potential approach

RADIOACTIVITY ^{144,145,146,147}Tm, ^150,151Lu, ^155,156,157Ta, ^159,160,161Re, ^{164,165,166,167}Ir, ^170,171Au, ^176,177Tl(p); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00618-1
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020CH12      Nucl.Phys. A997, 121717(2020)

J.-Ha.Cheng, J.-L.Chen, J.-G.Deng, X.-H.Li, Z.Zhang, P.-C.Chu

Systematic study of proton emission half-lives within the two-potential approach with Skyrme-Hartree-Fock

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121717
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020CH43      Eur.Phys.J. A 56, 273 (2020)

J.-H.Cheng, X.Pan, Y.-T.Zou, X.-H.Li, Z.Zhang, P.-C.Chu

Systematic study of proton radioactivity of spherical proton emitters with Skyrme interactions

RADIOACTIVITY ^{144,145,146,147}Tm, ^150,151Lu, ^155,156,157Ta, ^159,160,161Re, ^{164,165,166,167}Ir, ^170,171Au, ^176,177Tl(p); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00280-z
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019CH14      Phys.Rev. C 99, 035802 (2019)

P.-C.Chu, Y.Zhou, X.Qi, X.-H.Li, Z.Zhang, Y.Zhou

Isospin properties in quark matter and quark stars within isospin-dependent quark mass models

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.035802
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019CH27      Nucl.Phys. A987, 350 (2019)

J.-H.Cheng, J.-L.Chen, J.G.Deng, X.-J.Wu, X.-H.Li, P.-C.Chu

Systematic study of α decay half-lives based on Gamow-like model with a screened electrostatic barrier

RADIOACTIVITY Z>51(α); calculated even-even nuclei T_1/2 using modified Gamow-like model including centrifugal potential and electrostatic shielding with two parameters, radius constant r₀ and a parameter for the screened electrostatic potential; Z=120; calculated T_1/2 for 7 even-even nuclei and for some of their not yet synthesized α-decay chain. Halflives compared with those calculated using different approaches and with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.05.002
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019CH45      Eur.Phys.J. A 55, 214 (2019)

J.-L.Chen, J.-Y.Xu, J.-G.Deng, X.-H.Li, B.He, P.-C.Chu

New Geiger-Nuttall law for proton radioactivity

doi: 10.1140/epja/i2019-12927-7
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2018DE17      Phys.Rev. C 97, 044322 (2018)

J.-G.Deng, J.-C.Zhao, P.-C.Chu, X.-H.Li

Systematic study of α decay of nuclei around the Z=82, N=126 shell closures within the cluster-formation model and proximity potential 1977 formalism

RADIOACTIVITY ^{189,190,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,210,212,213,214,215,216,218,219}Po, ^{194,195,196,197,200,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222}Rn, ^{202,203,204,207,208,209,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220}Ra, ^{212,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221}Th, ^{216,217,218,221,222}U, ^186,188Hg, ^{187,188,189,190,191,192,194,210}Pb, ^{190,192,194,209,210,212,213,214}Bi, ^{192,197,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,223}At, ^{199,200,201,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221}Fr, ^{212,213,214,215,217,219,220,221,222}Pa, ^{205,206,207,211,215,216,217,218,219,220}Ac(α); calculated α-decay preformation factors using cluster-formation model (CFM) and T_1/2 using proximity potential 1977 formalism (Prox.1977). Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044322
Citations: PlumX Metrics