List of levels for 49TI

Author: T. W. Burrows | Citation: Nucl. Data Sheets 109, 1879 (2008) | Cutoff date: 14-Jul-2008

Levels: Resonance parameters: see 2006MuZX and I(γ+ce)(n,γ) E=0.00057 eV and ⁴⁸Ti(n,γ) E=11-52 keV resonance datasets for neutron parameters. See below for isobaric analog resonance data

Levels: See 1978Ha15 for additional discussion, in particular on the correspondence of states observed in different reactions

Levels: Bound-state t’s: from the study of IAS’s in ⁴⁹V. See ⁴⁸Ti(p,γ),(³He,pd), ⁵²Cr(p,α) for correspondences between states

Levels: Configurations: σ(θ) shows a predominant L=6 pattern and vector-analyzing power (VAP) has a clear J=7 signature in (d,α),(pol d,α) indicating a significant component of (⁴⁸Ca 0⁺)(π,1f_7/2)⁺²(ν,1f_7/2)^-1.

Gammas: For unplaced γ’s and γ’s with uncertain placement see (n,γ), (γ,γ’), (p,p’γ), and (n,n’γ)

Gammas: B(E|l)(W.u.),B(M|l)(W.u.),RUL: calculations for primary gammas are based on Γ_γ0 and Iγ/Iγ(8884γ)

Q-value: Note: Current evaluation has used the following Q record -601.9 8 8142.39 3 11352 5 -10171.8 9 2003Au03

E(level) (keV)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	Multipolarity	Mixing Ratio	Conversion Coefficient	Additional Data
1381.773	3/2-	3.4 ps 4	1381.745 5	(E2)		0.0001070	B(E2)(W.u.)=3.1 4, α=0.0001070 15, α(K)=5.27E-5 8, α(L)=4.71E-6 7, α(M)=6.02E-7 9, α(N)=3.27E-8 5, α(N+)=4.95E-5 7
1542.15	11/2-	1.00 ps 10	1542.5 3	E2		0.0001510	B(E2)(W.u.)=6.1 6, α=0.0001510 22, α(K)=4.20E-5 6, α(L)=3.75E-6 6, α(M)=4.79E-7 7, α(N)=2.61E-8 4, α(N+)=0.0001046 15
1585.963	3/2-		1585.942 6	(E2)		0.0001660	B(E2)(W.u.)>0.697 0.963, α=0.0001660 24, α(K)=3.97E-5 6, α(L)=3.54E-6 5, α(M)=4.53E-7 7, α(N)=2.46E-8 4, α(N+)=0.0001227 18
1723.482	1/2-		137.42 7	(M1,E2)		0.00848	α≥0.00848 0.101, α(K)=0.05 5, α(L)=0.005 4, α(M)=0.0006 5, α(N)=2.9×10^-5 25, α(N+)=2.9E-5 25
1723.482	1/2-		341.706 4	M1+E2	+0.1	0.000929	B(E2)(W.u.)>0.0160, B(M1)(W.u.)>7.74E-5, α=0.000929 14, α(K)=0.000843 12, α(L)=7.61E-5 11, α(M)=9.73E-6 14, α(N)=5.25E-7 8, α(N+)=5.25E-7 8
1762.011	5/2-	21.0 fs 19	1761.971 8	(M1+E2)		2.11×10^-4	α=2.11×10^-4 25, α(K)=3.08E-5 16, α(L)=2.75E-6 14, α(M)=3.51E-7 18, α(N)=1.91E-8 10, α(N+)=0.000177 23
2261.32	(5/2)-	59 fs 17	499.2	(M1(+E2))	0.26 LT	0.00063	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.49 15, α=0.00063 25, α(K)=0.00057 22, α(L)=5.1×10^-5 20, α(M)=7.E-6 3, α(N)=3.5E-7 14, α(N+)=3.5E-7 14
2261.32	(5/2)-	59 fs 17	638.41 7	(M1(+E2))	0.28 LT	0.00032	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.55 25, α=0.00032 9, α(K)=0.00029 9, α(L)=2.6×10^-5 8, α(M)=3.3E-6 10, α(N)=1.8E-7 5, α(N+)=1.8E-7 5
2471.4	(5/2)-	52 fs 17	709.1	(M1(+E2))	0.58 LT	0.00024	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.21 10, α=0.00024 6, α(K)=0.00022 6, α(L)=2.0×10^-5 5, α(M)=2.5E-6 7, α(N)=1.4E-7 4, α(N+)=1.4E-7 4
2471.4	(5/2)-	52 fs 17	848.3	(M1(+E2))	0.61 LT	0.00016	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.27 13, α=0.00016 3, α(K)=0.00014 3, α(L)=1.26×10^-5 24, α(M)=1.6E-6 3, α(N)=8.7E-8 16, α(N+)=8.7E-8 16
2505.5	15/2-		963.3 3	(E2(+M3))		0.00030	B(E2)(W.u.)>0.0093, B(M3)(W.u.)>0.40, α=0.00030 17, α(K)=0.00027 16, α(L)=2.5E-5 14, α(M)=3.2E-6 18, α(N)=1.7E-7 10, α(N+)=1.7E-7 10
3175.292	1/2-	54.8 fs 18	1451.79 4	(M1)		9.72×10^-5	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0083 5, α=9.72×10^-5 14, α(K)=4.13E-5 6, α(L)=3.68E-6 6, α(M)=4.71E-7 7, α(N)=2.57E-8 4, α(N+)=5.17E-5 8
3260.703	3/2-	11.2 fs 5	1498.662 7	(M1(+E2))	1.20 LT	1.22×10^-4	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.34 15, α=1.22×10^-4 15, α(K)=4.2E-5 3, α(L)=3.7E-6 3, α(M)=4.8E-7 4, α(N)=2.59E-8 18, α(N+)=7.6E-5 12
3618.48	5/2-		149.56 15	[E2]		0.0712	α=0.0712, α(K)=0.0644 10, α(L)=0.00599 9, α(M)=0.000759 11, α(N)=3.85×10^-5 6, α(N+)=3.85E-5 6
4221.802	1/2-	< 22 fs	434.09 16	(M1(+E2))	0.2618 LT	0.0010	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.336 12, α=0.0010 5, α(K)=0.0009 4, α(L)=8.E-5 4, α(M)=1.0E-5 5, α(N)=5.3E-7 24, α(N+)=5.3E-7 24
4221.802	1/2-	< 22 fs	2498.24 7	(M1)		0.000481	B(M1)(W.u.)>0.018, α=0.000481 7, α(K)=1.635×10^-5 23, α(L)=1.455E-6 21, α(M)=1.86E-7 3, α(N)=1.015E-8 15, α(N+)=0.000463 7
5115.562	1/2-	< 10 fs	1646.46 21	(M1)		1.49×10^-4	B(M1)(W.u.)>0.011, α=1.49×10^-4 21, α(K)=3.30E-5 5, α(L)=2.94E-6 5, α(M)=3.76E-7 6, α(N)=2.05E-8 13, α(N+)=0.0001128 16
5115.562	1/2-	< 10 fs	1940.14 19	(M1)		0.000253	B(M1)(W.u.)>0.026, α=0.000253 4, α(K)=2.48×10^-5 4, α(L)=2.21E-6 3, α(M)=2.83E-7 4, α(N)=1.543E-8 22, α(N+)=0.000225 4
5412.03	1/2+	19 fs +12-10	4030.06 16	(E1(+M2))	0.10 LE	0.0013	B(E1)(W.u.)=0.0004 3, α=0.0013 5, α(K)=8.4E-6 25, α(L)=7.5E-7 23, α(M)=1.0E-7 3, α(N)=5.2E-9 16, α(N+)=0.0012 5
8881.6	7/2+	2.29 eV 43 % IT = 89.1 28 % n = 10.9 28	4639 3	(E1(+M2))	0.116 LT	0.0014	B(E1)(W.u.)=0.00035 11, α=0.0014 5, α(K)=6.8E-6 19, α(L)=6.1E-7 17, α(M)=7.7E-8 21, α(N)=4.2E-9 12, α(N+)=0.0014 5
	7/2+	2.29 eV 43 % IT = 89.1 28 % n = 10.9 28	4807 3	(E1(+M2))	0.22 LT	0.0015	B(E1)(W.u.)=0.00010 3, α=0.0015 5, α(K)=6.5E-6 17, α(L)=5.7E-7 15, α(M)=7.4E-8 20, α(N)=4.0E-9 11, α(N+)=0.0015 5
	7/2+	2.29 eV 43 % IT = 89.1 28 % n = 10.9 28	5034 3	(E1(+M2))	0.31 LT	0.0016	B(E1)(W.u.)=5.9E-5 15, α=0.0016 5, α(K)=6.1E-6 16, α(L)=5.4E-7 14, α(M)=6.9E-8 18, α(N)=3.8E-9 10, α(N+)=0.0016 5
	7/2+	2.29 eV 43 % IT = 89.1 28 % n = 10.9 28	5098 3	(E1(+M2))	0.049 LT	0.0016	B(E1)(W.u.)=0.0024 7, α=0.0016 5, α(K)=5.9E-6 15, α(L)=5.3E-7 14, α(M)=6.8E-8 17, α(N)=3.7E-9 10, α(N+)=0.0016 5
	7/2+	2.29 eV 43 % IT = 89.1 28 % n = 10.9 28	5135 3	(E1(+M2))	0.33 LT	0.0016	B(E1)(W.u.)=5.2E-5, α=0.0016 5, α(K)=5.9E-6 15, α(L)=5.2E-7 13, α(M)=6.7E-8 17, α(N)=3.6E-9 9, α(N+)=0.0016 5
	7/2+	2.29 eV 43 % IT = 89.1 28 % n = 10.9 28	5374 5	[E1(+M2)]	0.58 LT	0.0017	B(E1)(W.u.)=2.2E-5 9, α=0.0017 5, α(K)=5.5E-6 14, α(L)=4.9E-7 12, α(M)=6.3E-8 15, α(N)=3.4E-9 9, α(N+)=0.0016 5
	7/2+	2.29 eV 43 % IT = 89.1 28 % n = 10.9 28	5444 3	[M2]		1.18×10^-3	α=1.18×10^-3 17, α(K)=6.70E-6 10, α(L)=5.95E-7 9, α(M)=7.61E-8 11, α(N)=4.16E-9 6, α(N+)=0.001175 17
	7/2+	2.29 eV 43 % IT = 89.1 28 % n = 10.9 28	6410 3	(E1(+M2))	0.50 LT		B(E1)(W.u.)=4.0E-5 15
	7/2+	2.29 eV 43 % IT = 89.1 28 % n = 10.9 28	7123 3	(E1(+M2))	0.069 LT		B(E1)(W.u.)=0.00017 5
	7/2+	2.29 eV 43 % IT = 89.1 28 % n = 10.9 28	8884 2	E1(+M2)	0.0318 LT		B(E1)(W.u.)=0.00056 5
E(level) (keV)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	Multipolarity	Mixing Ratio	Conversion Coefficient	Additional Data

Q(β-)=-601.9 keV 9	S(n)= 8142.39 keV 3	S(p)= 11348 keV 5	Q(α)= -10175.6 keV 5
Reference: 2012WA38

References:
A	⁴⁹Sc β^- decay	B	⁴⁹V ε decay
C	⁹Be(⁴⁶Ar,6nγ)	D	⁴⁷Ti(t,p) E=12.0 MeV
E	⁴⁸Ca(p,π^-),(pol p,π^-),	F	⁴⁸Ca(α,3nγ) E=30-55 MeV
G	I(γ+ce)(n,n’),(n,n’γ) E=1.0-5.9 MeV	H	⁴⁸Ti(n,γ),(pol n,γ) E=TH
I	I(γ+ce)(n,γ) E=0.00057 EV RES	J	⁴⁸Ti(n,γ) E=11-52 KEV RES
K	⁴⁸Ti(d,p),(d,pγ),(pol d,p)	L	⁴⁹Ti(γ,γ’),(γ,n)
M	⁴⁹Ti(p,p’),(p,p’γ) E=6-12 MeV	N	Coulomb Excitation (α,α’γ)
O	⁵⁰Ti(p,d),(d,t),(³He,α)	P	⁵⁰V(t,α) E=12.88 MeV
Q	⁵¹V(d,α),(pol d,α)	R	⁴⁹Ti(E,E) E=175-325, 500 MeV

E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
0.0	A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q	7/2-	STABLE
1381.773 5	G H J K L M N O Q	3/2-	3.4 ps 4	1381.745 5	100	(E2)	0.0	7/2-
1542.15 4	C F G K L M N P Q	11/2-	1.00 ps 10	1542.5 3	100	E2	0.0	7/2-
1585.963 6	D G H K L M N O	3/2-		1585.942 6	100	(E2)	0.0	7/2-
1610 10 ?	O	(9/2-)
1622.93 5	A D G H K L M P Q	(5/2)-	37 fs 4	1622.6 6	100	D,E2	0.0	7/2-
1723.482 6	D G H K M	1/2-		137.42 7 341.706 4	2.18 12 100.0 9	(M1,E2) M1+E2	1585.963 1381.773	3/2- 3/2-
1762.011 7	A D G H K L M O Q	5/2-	21.0 fs 19	1761.971 8	100	(M1+E2)	0.0	7/2-
2261.32 7	D G H K L M O Q	(5/2)-	59 fs 17	499.2 638.41 7 879.16 17 ? 2264 3	35 100 73	(M1(+E2)) (M1(+E2)) D,E2	1762.011 1622.93 1381.773 0.0	5/2- (5/2)- 3/2- 7/2-
2471.4 2	D G K L M O Q	(5/2)-	52 fs 17	709.1 848.3 2474 3	45 100 68	(M1(+E2)) (M1(+E2)) D,E2	1762.011 1622.93 0.0	5/2- (5/2)- 7/2-
2504.36 4	G H K L M O	1/2+		889.1 5 ? 1122.69 8	18 100 4		1622.93 1381.773	(5/2)- 3/2-
2505.5 3	C F M P Q	15/2-		963.3 3	100	(E2(+M3))	1542.15	11/2-
2513.44 15	D G H K L	5/2,7/2,9/2		2513.30 15	100		0.0	7/2-
2516 4 ?	D G K L M	5/2,7/2		1139 3 ? 2520 3 ?	>100 <20	D,Q	1381.773 0.0	3/2- 7/2-
2664.36 4	G H K M O Q	(3/2)+		902.38 5 1282.4?			1762.011 1381.773	5/2- 3/2-
2720.6 10	M P Q	(11/2+,13/2,15/2-)	57 fs 27	1178.4	100	D,E2	1542.15	11/2-
2721.30 6	H P Q			1135.35 6	100 5		1585.963	3/2-
2980.5 3	M Q	(7/2-,9/2-)	0.13 ps 8	260? 1357.6	<25 100	D,E2	2720.6 1622.93	(11/2+,13/2,15/2-) (5/2)-
3038.68 9	H K	(LE 5/2-)		1315.6 3	100		1723.482	1/2-
3042.5 5	K M Q	7/2-,9/2,11/2-	24 fs 15	1419.5 1500.2 3042.5	100 62 88	D,E2 D,E2 D,E2	1622.93 1542.15 0.0	(5/2)- 11/2- 7/2-
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
3175.292 8	D H K M O P	1/2-	54.8 fs 18	1451.79 4 1589.348 19 1793.478 7	9.4 3 39.3 12 100 3	(M1) D,E2 D,E2	1723.482 1585.963 1381.773	1/2- 3/2- 3/2-
3260.703 7	D H K M	3/2-	11.2 fs 5	1498.662 7 1674.734 22 1878.891 10	100.0 27 8.12 25 ≈10	(M1(+E2)) D,E2 D,E2	1762.011 1585.963 1381.773	5/2- 3/2- 3/2-
3290.3 5	C E F P Q	(17/2)-	< 0.07 ps	784.8 3	100	D+Q	2505.5	15/2-
3428.25 3	D H K L M O	3/2-		1665.96 17 1842.24 4 2046.44 5	15.5 16 100 13 84 8		1762.011 1585.963 1381.773	5/2- 3/2- 3/2-
3451 7 ?	D M P Q	(7/2-,9/2-)
3469.02 3	H K	1/2-		1883.06 4	100		1585.963	3/2-
3511 5	D K L M	5/2-
3606 3	K L M O Q	(5/2)+
3618.48 13	D H K M Q	5/2-		149.56 15	100	[E2]	3469.02	1/2-
3639 12 ?	K
3700.7 22	K L M O	(5/2,7/2,9/2)		3702 3			0.0	7/2-
3746 4	K L M O Q	5/2-,7/2-
3747 10	K L M P Q	+
3784.7 22	D L M O	5/2-,7/2-		3786 3			0.0	7/2-
3787.67 6	D H K	3/2-	< 16 fs	2025? 2201 2405.76 8			1762.011 1585.963 1381.773	5/2- 3/2- 3/2-
3818 10	M P
3854.98 7	D H K L M O Q	5/2-		1350.46 14 2132.0 3 2473.03 22	86 8 43 21 100 14		2504.36 1723.482 1381.773	1/2+ 1/2- 3/2-
3916 10 ?	M
3940.7 22	D L M	(5/2,7/2,9/2)		3942 3			0.0	7/2-
3967 5	E Q	-
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
3990 10 ?	D M
4074.16 22	D H K L M O Q	5/2-,7/2-		605.2 3	100		3469.02	1/2-
4142 4	D K L M	(5/2-)
4195 12	K M O	5/2-,7/2-
4221.802 23	H K M	1/2-	< 22 fs	434.09 16 2498.24 7 2635.5 3 2839.88 4	5.2 8 47.5 27 20 3 100 4	(M1(+E2)) (M1) D,E2 D,E2	3787.67 1723.482 1585.963 1381.773	3/2- 1/2- 3/2- 3/2-
4242 4	L O Q	7/2-
4300 15	D O	-
4340 15	D K O	-
4382.3 7	E F Q	(19/2)-	< 0.12 ps	1092.0 5	100	D+Q	3290.3	(17/2)-
4433.26 4	H K	3/2-		2709.63 12 2847.39 15	100 9 83 7		1723.482 1585.963	1/2- 3/2-
4456 12	K O	1/2+
4489 15	D	-
4506.9 10	K L	5/2+		3125			1381.773	3/2-
4561 10	O	1/2+
4584 10	P	+
4588.24 4	H K Q	3/2-		1327.74 8 ? 1549.56 8 3002.11 9 3205.96 17	100 4 45.3 24 94 5 33.9 28		3260.703 3038.68 1585.963 1381.773	3/2- (LE 5/2-) 3/2- 3/2-
4621 20	P
4666.666 21	H K	1/2-		1406.36 16 2943.00 3 3284.85 13	5.8 6 100 3 11.8 9		3260.703 1723.482 1381.773	3/2- 1/2- 3/2-
4725 10	P
4770 12	K O	3/2+,5/2+
4811.01 10	H			2307.3 4 3224.89 11	28 5 100 6		2504.36 1585.963	1/2+ 3/2-
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
4836 12	K
4897 12	K O	3/2+,5/2+
4910.84 5	D H K O	1/2-		3186.91 10 3325.10 25	100 7 46 5		1723.482 1585.963	1/2- 3/2-
5063 12	D K	(5/2-)
5115.562 21	H K	1/2-	< 10 fs	1646.46 21 1853.7 5 1940.14 19 ? 2600.9 6 2611.04 8 3529.31 10 ? 3733.61 3	3.5 4 5.0 15 13.7 23 2.1 6 19.1 11 12.8 6 100.0 23	(M1) D,E2 (M1) D,E2 D,E2 D,E2	3469.02 3260.703 3175.292 2513.44 2504.36 1585.963 1381.773	1/2- 3/2- 1/2- 5/2,7/2,9/2 1/2+ 3/2- 3/2-
5121 10	P Q	11/2+,13/2+
5151.11 10	H	(3/2)		1077.0 3 1532.79 21 2430.9 4 3388.0 7 3427.7 5 ? 3564.71 17	53 10 67 8 44 12 25 8 44 9 100 9		4074.16 3618.48 2721.30 1762.011 1723.482 1585.963	5/2-,7/2- 5/2- 5/2- 1/2- 3/2-
5173 12	D K P	5/2-,7/2-
5200 15	D	+
5232 15	D K	3/2-,1/2-
5254.5 25	K	1/2+
5325.8 13	K	5/2+,3/2+
5347 15	D	(5/2-)
5375 12 ?	K
5412.03 9	H K	1/2+	19 fs +12-10	4030.06 16	100	(E1(+M2))	1381.773	3/2-
5437 12	K	3/2-,1/2-
5579 12	K
5606 10 ?	Q
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
5655 12	D K	(3/2,1/2)-
5693 12	K	5/2+,3/2+
5737.9 12	K	3/2-,1/2-
5774 15	K	1/2+
5795.67 13	H K	(3/2-,1/2-)		3534.37 17 4071.7 4	100 12 52 8		2261.32 1723.482	(5/2)- 1/2-
5861 15	D K	5/2-
5910 15	D	-
5931 12	K	1/2+
5965 12	D K	(5/2)-
6010 12	D K	5/2-
6012 15	O	3/2+,5/2+
6078 12	K	1/2+
6091 15 ?	K
6125 10 ?	Q
6145 12	K
6168 12	K
6231 10 ?	Q
6269 10 ?	Q
6279 15	D	(5/2-)
6513 10	Q
7329 15	O	3/2+,5/2+
7626 15	O	3/2+,5/2+
8132.605 29	I	1/2+
8153.65 3	J	1/2-,3/2-		6772			1381.773	3/2-
8155.54 3	J	1/2-,3/2-		6774			1381.773	3/2-
8159.63 4	J	1/2+		6778			1381.773	3/2-
8163.56 5	J	1/2-,3/2-		6782			1381.773	3/2-
8178.44 4	J	1/2+		6797			1381.773	3/2-
8193.23 11	J	1/2+		6812			1381.773	3/2-
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
8724 6	O	5/2-,7/2-
8881.6 9	L	7/2+	2.29 eV 43 % IT = 89.1 28 % n = 10.9 28	4374 3 4639 3 4739 3 4807 3 4942 3 5034 3 5098 3 5135 3 5182 3 5268 3 5374 5 5444 3 6365 3 6410 3 6620 3 7123 3 7258 3 8884 2	4.0 8 9.0 18 1.0 2 3.0 6 6.0 12 2.0 2 8.0 16 2 10.0 20 1.0 2 1.0 2 4.0 8 7.0 14 3.0 6 1.0 2 16 3 2.0 4 100 20	D,E2 (E1(+M2)) (E1(+M2)) D,E2 (E1(+M2)) (E1(+M2)) (E1(+M2)) D,E2 [E1(+M2)] [M2] D (E1(+M2)) D,Q (E1(+M2)) D,Q E1(+M2)	4506.9 4242 4142 4074.16 3940.7 3854.98 3784.7 3746 3700.7 3618.48 3511 3428.25 2513.44 2471.4 2261.32 1762.011 1622.93 0.0	5/2+ 7/2- (5/2-) 5/2-,7/2- (5/2,7/2,9/2) 5/2- 5/2-,7/2- 5/2-,7/2- (5/2,7/2,9/2) 5/2- 5/2- 3/2- 5/2,7/2,9/2 (5/2)- (5/2)- 5/2- (5/2)- 7/2-
8890	O	3/2+,5/2+
9720?	L
10972 15	O	(1/2+)
11110 15	O	(3/2+,5/2+)
11700	O	(1/2-,3/2-)

E(level)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	Comments
1542.15	11/2-	1.00 ps 10	E(level): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ). Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4%. Level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment. From (α,3nγ).
1585.963	3/2-		T=5/2 Possible doublet. See discussion in (³He,α). E(level): Possible doublet. See discussion in (³He,α). J^π(level): From comparison of VAP to DWBA in (pol d,p).
1622.93	(5/2)-	37 fs 4	CONF=((48CA 0+)(P,1F7/2,+2)(N,1F7/2,-1)), T=5/2 E(level): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ). Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4%. Level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment. From (α,3nγ).
1723.482	1/2-		T=5/2 T_1/2>0.35 ps, T_1/2<6.9 ns. J^π(level): From comparison of VAP to DWBA in (pol d,p).
1762.011	5/2-	21.0 fs 19	T=(5/2) J^π(level): L(t,p)=0 or 0⁺2. Parenthesized values are shown for weak states where the assumption that the two nucleons are transferred in a relative s state may not Be valid.
2261.32	(5/2)-	59 fs 17	T=5/2 E(level): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ). Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4%.
2471.4	(5/2)-	52 fs 17	T=5/2 XREF: Q(2504). E(level): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ). Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4%. Level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment. From (α,3nγ).
2504.36	1/2+		T=(5/2) T_1/2>0.28 ps, T_1/2<6.9 ns.
2505.5	15/2-		T_1/2>3.5 ps, T_1/2<6.9 ns.
2513.44	5/2,7/2,9/2		E(level): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states. J^π(level): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.
2516	5/2,7/2		T_1/2>0.42 ps, T_1/2<6.9 ns. E(level): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states. J^π(level): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.
2664.36	(3/2)+		T=(5/2) T_1/2>0.22 ps, T_1/2<6.9 ns.
2721.30			2722, L=4, state in (d,α),(pol d,α) and 2724, L=(3), state in (t,α) may correspond to this or the previous state.
2980.5	(7/2-,9/2-)	0.13 ps 8	CONF=((48CA 0+)(P,1F7/2,+2)(N,1F7/2,-1)) E(level): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ). Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4%. Level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment. From (α,3nγ).
3042.5	7/2-,9/2,11/2-	24 fs 15	CONF=((48CA 0+)(P,1F7/2,+2)(N,1F7/2,-1)) E(level): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ). Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4%. Level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment. From (α,3nγ).
3175.292	1/2-	54.8 fs 18	T=(5/2) J^π(level): From comparison of VAP to DWBA in (pol d,p).
3260.703	3/2-	11.2 fs 5	T=5/2 J^π(level): From comparison of VAP to DWBA in (pol d,p).
3469.02	1/2-		E(level): From (p,p’γ). J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and γ-circular polarization in (pol n,γ).
3511	5/2-		E(level): From (t,p). J^π(level): L(t,p)=0 or 0⁺2. Parenthesized values are shown for weak states where the assumption that the two nucleons are transferred in a relative s state may not Be valid.
3606	(5/2)+		E(level): Level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment. From (α,3nγ). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n).
3618.48	5/2-		J^π(level): L(t,p)=0 or 0⁺2. Parenthesized values are shown for weak states where the assumption that the two nucleons are transferred in a relative s state may not Be valid.
3700.7	(5/2,7/2,9/2)		E(level): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n).
3747	+		3749 12 in (d,p), 3749 4, 5/2 to 9/2, in (γ,γ’), and 3746.5 6 in (p,p’γ) probably correspond to this or the following state.
3784.7	5/2-,7/2-		E(level): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in neutron pickup reactions.
3787.67	3/2-	< 16 fs	E(level): From (d,pγ). T_1/2(level): From DSAM in (d,pγ).
E(level)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	Comments
3818			E(level): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ). Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4%. Level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment. From (α,3nγ).
3854.98	5/2-		T=5/2 J^π(level): L(t,p)=0 or 0⁺2. Parenthesized values are shown for weak states where the assumption that the two nucleons are transferred in a relative s state may not Be valid.
3940.7	(5/2,7/2,9/2)		E(level): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n).
3990			E(level): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ). Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4%.
4074.16	5/2-,7/2-		J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in neutron pickup reactions.
4142	(5/2-)		E(level): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). J^π(level): L(t,p)=0 or 0⁺2. Parenthesized values are shown for weak states where the assumption that the two nucleons are transferred in a relative s state may not Be valid.
4195	5/2-,7/2-		J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in neutron pickup reactions.
4221.802	1/2-	< 22 fs	E(level): From (d,pγ). J^π(level): From comparison of VAP to DWBA in (pol d,p). T_1/2(level): From DSAM in (d,pγ).
4242	7/2-		CONF=((48CA 0+)(P,1F7/2,+2)(N,1F7/2,-1)) E(level): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n).
4340	-		See comment on preceding state. E(level): From (t,p).
4433.26	3/2-		J^π(level): From comparison of VAP to DWBA in (pol d,p).
4506.9	5/2+		T=5/2 J^π(level): From comparison of VAP to DWBA in (pol d,p).
4561	1/2+		J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in neutron pickup reactions.
4588.24	3/2-		E(level): From (p,p’γ). J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and γ-circular polarization in (pol n,γ).
4666.666	1/2-		J^π(level): From comparison of VAP to DWBA in (pol d,p).
4770	3/2+,5/2+		T=(5/2) J^π(level): From comparison of VAP to DWBA in (pol d,p).
4910.84	1/2-		E(level): From (p,p’γ). J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and γ-circular polarization in (pol n,γ).
5063	(5/2-)		J^π(level): L(t,p)=0 or 0⁺2. Parenthesized values are shown for weak states where the assumption that the two nucleons are transferred in a relative s state may not Be valid.
5115.562	1/2-	< 10 fs	E(level): From (d,pγ). J^π(level): From comparison of VAP to DWBA in (pol d,p). T_1/2(level): From DSAM in (d,pγ).
5347	(5/2-)		J^π(level): L(t,p)=0 or 0⁺2. Parenthesized values are shown for weak states where the assumption that the two nucleons are transferred in a relative s state may not Be valid.
5412.03	1/2+	19 fs +12-10	E(level): From (d,pγ). T_1/2(level): From DSAM in (d,pγ).
5861	5/2-		J^π(level): L(t,p)=0 or 0⁺2. Parenthesized values are shown for weak states where the assumption that the two nucleons are transferred in a relative s state may not Be valid.
6010	5/2-		J^π(level): L(t,p)=0 or 0⁺2. Parenthesized values are shown for weak states where the assumption that the two nucleons are transferred in a relative s state may not Be valid.
6279	(5/2-)		J^π(level): L(t,p)=0 or 0⁺2. Parenthesized values are shown for weak states where the assumption that the two nucleons are transferred in a relative s state may not Be valid.
7329	3/2+,5/2+		J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in neutron pickup reactions.
E(level)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	Comments
7626	3/2+,5/2+		J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in neutron pickup reactions.
8153.65	1/2-,3/2-		E(level): Calibration for high-energy γ’s in (n,γ) were based on the ²H and ¹⁵N neutron binding energies; if S(n)(¹⁵N)=10833.230 (2003Au03), these energies may need to Be reduced by up to 7 ppm. J^π(level): From adopted J and L in 2006MuZX.
8155.54	1/2-,3/2-		E(level): Calibration for high-energy γ’s in (n,γ) were based on the ²H and ¹⁵N neutron binding energies; if S(n)(¹⁵N)=10833.230 (2003Au03), these energies may need to Be reduced by up to 7 ppm. J^π(level): From adopted J and L in 2006MuZX.
8159.63	1/2+		E(level): Calibration for high-energy γ’s in (n,γ) were based on the ²H and ¹⁵N neutron binding energies; if S(n)(¹⁵N)=10833.230 (2003Au03), these energies may need to Be reduced by up to 7 ppm. J^π(level): From adopted J and L in 2006MuZX.
8163.56	1/2-,3/2-		E(level): Calibration for high-energy γ’s in (n,γ) were based on the ²H and ¹⁵N neutron binding energies; if S(n)(¹⁵N)=10833.230 (2003Au03), these energies may need to Be reduced by up to 7 ppm. J^π(level): From adopted J and L in 2006MuZX.
8178.44	1/2+		E(level): Calibration for high-energy γ’s in (n,γ) were based on the ²H and ¹⁵N neutron binding energies; if S(n)(¹⁵N)=10833.230 (2003Au03), these energies may need to Be reduced by up to 7 ppm. J^π(level): From adopted J and L in 2006MuZX.
8193.23	1/2+		E(level): Calibration for high-energy γ’s in (n,γ) were based on the ²H and ¹⁵N neutron binding energies; if S(n)(¹⁵N)=10833.230 (2003Au03), these energies may need to Be reduced by up to 7 ppm. J^π(level): From adopted J and L in 2006MuZX.
8724	5/2-,7/2-		T=7/2 Analog of ⁴⁹Sc g.s. E(level): Analog of ⁴⁹Sc g.s. J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in neutron pickup reactions.
8881.6	7/2+	2.29 eV 43 % IT = 89.1 28 % n = 10.9 28	Γ_γ0=0.353 31, Γ_n=0.25 5 726, L=4, neutron group to ⁴⁸Ti g.s. E(level): 726, L=4, neutron group to ⁴⁸Ti g.s.
8890	3/2+,5/2+		J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in neutron pickup reactions.
9720			Weak 582-keV neutron group to ⁴⁸Ti 983 state observed in (γ,n).
10972	(1/2+)		T=(7/2) IAS(⁴⁹Sc 2230). J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in neutron pickup reactions.
11110	(3/2+,5/2+)		T=(7/2) IAS(⁴⁹Sc 2380). J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in neutron pickup reactions.
11700	(1/2-,3/2-)		T=(7/2) IAS?. J^π(level): From angular momentum transfer in neutron pickup reactions.

E(level)	E(gamma)	Comments
1381.773	1381.745	E(γ): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ).. Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4% M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL, ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
1542.15	1542.5	E(γ): Level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment. From (α,3nγ) I(γ): From (α,3nγ) M(γ): ΔJ=2 Q in (α,3nγ). Comparison to RUL excludes M2
1585.963	1585.942	E(γ): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ).. Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4% M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
1622.93	1622.6	M(γ): From comparison to RUL
1723.482	137.42	M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=no from level scheme. From comparison to RUL
1723.482	341.706	E(γ): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ).. Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4%
1762.011	1761.971	E(γ): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ).. Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4%
2261.32	499.2	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (p,p’γ). From (t,p) I(γ): From (p,p’γ) M(γ): d from comparison to RUL. Δπ=no from level scheme
	638.41	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (t,p) I(γ): From (p,p’γ) M(γ): d from comparison to RUL. Δπ=no from level scheme
	879.16	I(γ): weak
	2264	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2471.4	709.1	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (p,p’γ). From (t,p) I(γ): From (p,p’γ) M(γ): d from comparison to RUL. Δπ=no from level scheme
	848.3	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (p,p’γ). From (t,p) I(γ): From (p,p’γ) M(γ): d from comparison to RUL. Δπ=no from level scheme
	2474	E(γ): From (t,p). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (p,p’γ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2505.5	963.3	E(γ): Level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment. From (α,3nγ) I(γ): From (α,3nγ) M(γ): Q from γ(θ) in (α,3nγ). Δπ=no from level scheme
2516	1139	E(γ): From (t,p). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (p,p’γ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2516	2520	E(γ): From (t,p). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (p,p’γ)
2664.36	1282.4	E(γ): From (p,p’γ)
2720.6	1178.4	E(γ): From (p,p’γ). From (t,p) I(γ): From (p,p’γ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2980.5	260	E(γ): From (p,p’γ). From (t,p) I(γ): From (p,p’γ)
2980.5	1357.6	E(γ): From (p,p’γ). From (t,p) I(γ): From (p,p’γ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3042.5	1419.5	E(γ): From (p,p’γ). From (t,p) I(γ): From (p,p’γ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1500.2	E(γ): From (p,p’γ). From (t,p) I(γ): From (p,p’γ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	3042.5	E(γ): From (p,p’γ). From (t,p) I(γ): From (p,p’γ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3175.292	1451.79	M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Ne E2 since 1/2-\|)1/2- transition; Δπ=no from level scheme
	1589.348	E(γ): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ).. Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4% M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1793.478	E(γ): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ).. Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4% M(γ): From comparison to RUL
E(level)	E(gamma)	Comments
3260.703	1498.662	E(γ): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ).. Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4%. 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states. M(γ): d from comparison to RUL. Δπ=no from level scheme
	1674.734	E(γ): From (p,p’),(p,p’γ).. Systematic uncertainty=2.6×10^-4% M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1878.891	M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3290.3	784.8	E(γ): Level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment. From (α,3nγ) I(γ): From (α,3nγ)
3700.7	3702	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n)
3784.7	3786	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n)
3787.67	2025	E(γ): From (d,pγ)
3787.67	2201	E(γ): From (d,pγ)
3940.7	3942	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n)
4221.802	434.09	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states. M(γ): d from comparison to RUL. Δπ=no from level scheme
	2498.24	E(γ): Calibration for high-energy γ’s in (n,γ) were based on the ²H and ¹⁵N neutron binding energies; if S(n)(¹⁵N)=10833.230 (2003Au03), these energies may need to Be reduced by up to 7 ppm M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Ne E2 since 1/2-\|)1/2- transition; Δπ=no from level scheme
	2635.5	M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	2839.88	E(γ): Calibration for high-energy γ’s in (n,γ) were based on the ²H and ¹⁵N neutron binding energies; if S(n)(¹⁵N)=10833.230 (2003Au03), these energies may need to Be reduced by up to 7 ppm M(γ): From comparison to RUL
4382.3	1092.0	E(γ): Level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment. From (α,3nγ) I(γ): From (α,3nγ)
4506.9	3125	E(γ): From (d,pγ)
4588.24	3002.11	E(γ): Calibration for high-energy γ’s in (n,γ) were based on the ²H and ¹⁵N neutron binding energies; if S(n)(¹⁵N)=10833.230 (2003Au03), these energies may need to Be reduced by up to 7 ppm
4910.84	3186.91	E(γ): Eγ differs from calculated value by 3 to 4 σ
5115.562	1646.46	M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Ne E2 since 1/2-\|)1/2- transition; Δπ=no from level scheme
	1853.7	M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1940.14	M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Ne E2 since 1/2-\|)1/2- transition; Δπ=no from level scheme
	2611.04	M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	3529.31	M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	3733.61	E(γ): Calibration for high-energy γ’s in (n,γ) were based on the ²H and ¹⁵N neutron binding energies; if S(n)(¹⁵N)=10833.230 (2003Au03), these energies may need to Be reduced by up to 7 ppm M(γ): From comparison to RUL
5412.03	4030.06	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states. M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=yes from level scheme
8153.65	6772	E(γ): Nominal energies calculated from level energy differences
E(level)	E(gamma)	Comments
8155.54	6774	E(γ): Nominal energies calculated from level energy differences
8159.63	6778	E(γ): Nominal energies calculated from level energy differences
8163.56	6782	E(γ): Nominal energies calculated from level energy differences
8178.44	6797	E(γ): Nominal energies calculated from level energy differences
8193.23	6812	E(γ): Nominal energies calculated from level energy differences
8881.6	4374	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	4639	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): d from γ(θ) in (γ,γ’). Δπ=yes from level scheme
	4739	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n)
	4807	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=yes from level scheme
	4942	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	5034	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=yes from level scheme
	5098	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=yes from level scheme
	5135	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=yes from level scheme
	5182	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	5268	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n)
	5374	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n)
	5444	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n)
	6365	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): from γ(θ) in (γ,γ’)
	6410	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=yes from level scheme
	6620	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	7123	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): d from γ(θ) in (γ,γ’). Δπ=yes from level scheme
	7258	E(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	8884	E(γ): 2513, 2517 states: evaluator suggests that these states are a possible doublet based on conflicting γ information in (n,γ) and (p,p’γ). 1135γ’s were observed in both while a 2513γ and a 2517γ were noted in the respective works. Iγ(1135γ)/Iγ(2513γ)≈1 in (n,γ); Iγ(2517γ)/Iγ(1135γ)<20 in (p,p’γ). Further, arguments of 1983Ru08 in (n,γ) appear strong for placement of 1135γ from the 2721 state while pγ-coin in (p,p’γ) associate the 1135γ with a state at ≈2.5 MeV. Jπ=5/2- (empirical J-dependence of L=3 and VAP in (d,p)) may correspond to one or both of these states.. From (γ,γ’),(γ,n). From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) I(γ): From (γ,γ’),(γ,n) M(γ): from γ(θ) and linear polarization in (γ,γ)