ADOPTED LEVELS, GAMMAS for 47Ti
Author: T. W. Burrows | Citation: Nucl. Data Sheets 108, 923 (2007) | Cutoff date: 20-Feb-2007
Full ENSDF file | Adopted Levels (PDF version)
Q(β-)=-2930.60 keV 15 | S(n)= 8880.72 keV 15 | S(p)= 10464.9 keV 7 | Q(α)= -8952.5 keV 5 | ||
Reference: 2012WA38 |
E(level) (keV) | XREF | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | I(γ) | M(γ) | Final Levels | |
0.0 | ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP R | 5/2- | STABLE | |||||
159.371 12 | ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP R | 7/2- | 210 ps 6 | 159.373 12 | 100 | M1+E2 | 0.0 | 5/2- |
1250.7 10 | G I | (1/2-,3/2-) | ||||||
1252.09 4 | CDEF LMNO QR | 9/2- | 140 fs 13 | 1092.71 5 1252.0? | 100 2 6 2 | M1+E2 E2 | 159.371 0.0 | 7/2- 5/2- |
1444.25 4 | C EF IJKLM P | 11/2- | 0.90 ps 14 | 192.150 10 1284.86 4 | 6.2 100 | M1+E2 E2 | 1252.09 159.371 | 9/2- 7/2- |
1549.65 9 | B DEFGHIJ L NOP R | 3/2- | 1.5 ps 4 | 1390.33 10 1549.9 4 | 100.0 29 83.9 25 | E2 M1+E2 | 159.371 0.0 | 7/2- 5/2- |
1670 80 | L R | |||||||
1793.80 16 | B DEFG IJ O R | 1/2- | 1.7 ps +17-6 | 244.27 16 1793.9 4 | 49.1 23 100 | M1+E2 (E2) | 1549.65 0.0 | 3/2- 5/2- |
1825.0 1 | D FG I NOP R | 3/2+,5/2+ | 2.1 ps +19-7 | 1825 | 100 | (E1+M2) | 0.0 | 5/2- |
2163.2 2 | B DE IJK NOP | 3/2- | 25.1 fs 43 | 2003.1 10 2163.0 5 | 5.4 6 100.0 23 | (E2) (M1(+E2)) | 159.371 0.0 | 7/2- 5/2- |
2166.7 2 | B D F R | 5/2 | 19 fs 5 | 2007.3 10 | 100 | D(+Q) | 159.371 | 7/2- |
2259.5 2 | D IJ NO R | 5/2+ | 0.54 ps 12 | 2101 2259.7 | 22 4 100 4 | (E1(+M2)) (E1(+M2)) | 159.371 0.0 | 7/2- 5/2- |
2297.1 2 | D F I KL R | 5/2-,7/2- | < 10 fs | 2137 2297 | 28 4 100 4 | (M1+E2) (M1,E2) | 159.371 0.0 | 7/2- 5/2- |
2344? | I | |||||||
2364.9 2 | D I NOP R | 1/2+ | > 1.53 ps | 540.0 | 100 | 1825.0 | 3/2+,5/2+ | |
2406.2 2 | D G I L | (9/2-) | 23 fs 7 | 962 1154 2247 2406? | 14 5 30 5 100 3 14 5 | D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 (E2) | 1444.25 1252.09 159.371 0.0 | 11/2- 9/2- 7/2- 5/2- |
2416.3 2 | D FG I L R | 1/2- TO 7/2- | 1.0 ps +6-3 | 591 866 2416 | 100 7 53 7 79 7 | D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 | 1825.0 1549.65 0.0 | 3/2+,5/2+ 3/2- 5/2- |
2499.4 19 ? | G | 1/2(-),3/2,5/2+ | 2500 5 ? | | 0.0 | 5/2- | ||
E(level) (keV) | XREF | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | I(γ) | M(γ) | Final Levels | |
2520? | I O | 1/2+ | ||||||
2525.8 2 | B D I | 3/2-,5/2- | 94 fs 19 | 2366.3 5 2525.6 5 | 96 7 100 4 | D,E2 D,E2 | 159.371 0.0 | 7/2- 5/2- |
2548.2 2 | D FG IJK O R | 3/2- | 6.2 fs 7 | 2548.7 5 | 100 | (M1(+E2)) | 0.0 | 5/2- |
2572.9 2 | D I N | 1/2+ | 0.53 ps +22-14 | 748 1023 | 37 6 100 6 | D,E2 (E1(+M2)) | 1825.0 1549.65 | 3/2+,5/2+ 3/2- |
2599.6 2 | D G I NO | 3/2-,5/2,7/2 | 1.3 ps +5-3 | 775 2441 2600 | 27 6 81 6 100 6 | D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 | 1825.0 159.371 0.0 | 3/2+,5/2+ 7/2- 5/2- |
2619.4 2 | DEFG IJ L NOP R | 7/2- | 29 fs 8 | 452 1367 2460 2619 | 2.7 14 10 3 100 4 25 4 | D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 | 2166.7 1252.09 159.371 0.0 | 5/2 9/2- 7/2- 5/2- |
2668.0 2 | CD F I R | 9/2,13/2 | 21 fs 16 | 1224 | 100 | D+Q | 1444.25 | 11/2- |
2682.30 5 | CD F QR | 11/2(-) | > 2.10 ps | 276 1238 2 1430.22 4 | 1.4 43 100 | D,Q D(+Q) | 2406.2 1444.25 1252.09 | (9/2-) 11/2- 9/2- |
2695? | I | |||||||
2748.87 6 | CD F QR | 15/2- | 1.11 ps 21 | 1304.61 4 | 100 | E2 | 1444.25 | 11/2- |
2757.6 2 | D I R | 7/2- TO 13/2- | 17 fs 11 | 1314 1506 | 100 4 35 4 | D,E2 D,E2 | 1444.25 1252.09 | 11/2- 9/2- |
2785.1 5 | D | 3/2 TO 9/2 | 2785 | 100 | 0.0 | 5/2- | ||
2793.2 5 | B D G IJ | 1/2- | 1243.5 5 2793.3 10 | 100 23 26 5 | 1549.65 0.0 | 3/2- 5/2- | ||
2800.2 10 | D NOP R | 0.35 ps +26-16 | 2800 | 100 | D,E2 | 0.0 | 5/2- | |
2809.5 4 | D NOP R | 5/2-,7/2,9/2- | 49 fs 23 | 1558 2810 | 32 5 100 5 | D,E2 D,E2 | 1252.09 0.0 | 9/2- 5/2- |
2828.5 2 | D IJ NOP R | 1/2- TO 7/2 | 0.16 ps 5 | 412 1003 2828 | 97 11 81 11 100 11 | D D,E2 D,E2 | 2416.3 1825.0 0.0 | 1/2- TO 7/2- 3/2+,5/2+ 5/2- |
E(level) (keV) | XREF | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | I(γ) | M(γ) | Final Levels | |
2838.9 5 | D F IJ N | 3/2- TO 9/2- | < 33 fs | 2680 2839 | 100 5 20 5 | D,E2 D,E2 | 159.371 0.0 | 7/2- 5/2- |
2846.3 3 | D F IJ L R | 5/2- TO 11/2- | < 19 fs | 1594 2687 | 72 7 100 7 | D,E2 D,E2 | 1252.09 159.371 | 9/2- 7/2- |
2855 5 ? | FG L R | 1/2(-),3/2,5/2+ | 2855 5 ? | | 0.0 | 5/2- | ||
2868? | F I L | |||||||
3033.1 2 | D I L R | 5/2-,7/2 | 0.41 ps 9 | 773 1781 2874 3033 | 28 5 25 5 100 7 23 5 | D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 | 2259.5 1252.09 159.371 0.0 | 5/2+ 9/2- 7/2- 5/2- |
3051.5 2 | D I L R | 5/2- TO 11/2- | 0.43 ps +12-9 | 267 1800 2893 | 15 6 100 9 98 9 | D D,E2 D,E2 | 2785.1 1252.09 159.371 | 3/2 TO 9/2 9/2- 7/2- |
3176.0 3 | D G I O R | 3/2-,5/2+ | 0.23 ps +10-7 | 760 811 1013 1351 3017 3176 | 42 12 46 12 38 12 62 12 100 15 96 19 | D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 | 2416.3 2364.9 2163.2 1825.0 159.371 0.0 | 1/2- TO 7/2- 1/2+ 3/2- 3/2+,5/2+ 7/2- 5/2- |
3211 8 | E I NOP R | 5/2-,7/2- | ||||||
3225.8 3 | D F I | 7/2- | 7 fs +7-6 | 1974 3067 3226 | 100 6 46 6 13 5 | 1252.09 159.371 0.0 | 9/2- 7/2- 5/2- | |
3251.6 3 | DEF I | 7/2- | 29 fs 9 | 955 1808 3093 3252 | 27 7 64 7 100 9 31 7 | D,E2 (E2) D,E2 D,E2 | 2297.1 1444.25 159.371 0.0 | 5/2-,7/2- 11/2- 7/2- 5/2- |
3277.7 3 | D IJ R | 3/2- | 42 fs 22 | 1113 1728 | 100 10 72 10 | D,E2 D,E2 | 2166.7 1549.65 | 5/2 3/2- |
3287.73 6 | CD F QR | 13/2- | 0.51 ps +16-10 | 605.47 5 1843.36 6 2037 | 44 100 11 | (M1(+E2)) (M1(+E2)) (E2) | 2682.30 1444.25 1252.09 | 11/2(-) 11/2- 9/2- |
E(level) (keV) | XREF | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | I(γ) | M(γ) | Final Levels | |
3368.9 4 | D I R | 7/2-,9/2,11/2- | 0.19 ps 6 | 1925 3210 | 64 10 100 10 | D,E2 D,E2 | 1444.25 159.371 | 11/2- 7/2- |
3400.5 2 | D I R | 7/2- TO 13/2 | 1.4 ps +10-4 | 348 718 1956 | 86 14 52 10 100 12 | D D,E2 D,E2 | 3051.5 2682.30 1444.25 | 5/2- TO 11/2- 11/2(-) 11/2- |
3434.6 4 | D I | 1/2- TO 7/2 | 65 fs 22 | 1610 3435 | 79 9 100 9 | D,E2 D,E2 | 1825.0 0.0 | 3/2+,5/2+ 5/2- |
3484.5 5 | D F I NO R | (3/2-) | 30 fs 10 | 3325 | 100 | (E2) | 159.371 | 7/2- |
3515.5 5 | D F I O R | 1/2+ | 40 fs 12 | 1151 1691 3516? | 80 13 100 13 37 11 | D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 | 2364.9 1825.0 0.0 | 1/2+ 3/2+,5/2+ 5/2- |
3544.8 4 | D G IJ N | 3/2-,5/2+ | < 35 fs | 1180 1720 3386 3545 | 19 6 48 8 100 10 42 8 | D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 | 2364.9 1825.0 159.371 0.0 | 1/2+ 3/2+,5/2+ 7/2- 5/2- |
3553.6 10 | D G IJ N P | 3/2- TO 11/2- | 35 fs +38-33 | 3395 | 100 | D,E2 | 159.371 | 7/2- |
3567.97 8 | CD F P | 17/2- | 69 fs 21 | 819.09 5 | 100 | M1+E2 | 2748.87 | 15/2- |
3582.7 4 | D F I | (3/2-) | < 15 fs | 3424 | 100 | D,E2 | 159.371 | 7/2- |
3622.5 6 | D F I | 5/2- TO 13/2- | 20 fs 19 | 2370 | 100 | D,E2 | 1252.09 | 9/2- |
3654 | F I O | |||||||
3676.1 9 | D FG IJ | 3/2- | < 40 fs | 3676 | 100 | D,E2 | 0.0 | 5/2- |
3701.8 5 | D F I | 7/2,9/2,11/2,13/2- | 24 fs +24-22 | 1034 2450 | 92 19 100 19 | D D,E2 | 2668.0 1252.09 | 9/2,13/2 9/2- |
3724 16 | F I | |||||||
3727.1 6 | C | (13/2-) | 1321 2475 | 100 7.5 | D,Q | 2406.2 1252.09 | (9/2-) 9/2- | |
3780.0 10 | D I | 3/2(-) TO 9/2- | 44 fs 19 | 3621 3780 | 56 12 100 12 | D,(E2) D,E2 | 159.371 0.0 | 7/2- 5/2- |
3827.1 5 | DE I | 7/2- | 17 fs 9 | 2383 | 100 | (E2) | 1444.25 | 11/2- |
3839 11 | F I | |||||||
E(level) (keV) | XREF | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | I(γ) | M(γ) | Final Levels | |
3889 | I | |||||||
3923 4 | EFG IJK O | 3/2- | 3925 5 | 100 | D,Q | 0.0 | 5/2- | |
3961 16 | F I | |||||||
3993.94 8 | CD F Q | 15/2- | 0.10 ps +8-5 | 267 706.21 5 2550 | 1.2 100 12 | (M1(+E2)) (M1(+E2)) (E2) | 3727.1 3287.73 1444.25 | (13/2-) 13/2- 11/2- |
4040 16 | I | |||||||
4095 16 | I | 1/2-,3/2- | ||||||
4112 16 | I N | |||||||
4132 16 ? | I N | |||||||
4164 | I N | |||||||
4180 | I | |||||||
4217 16 | I | |||||||
4243 16 | E I | |||||||
4264 16 | E I | |||||||
4277 | I | |||||||
4281 | I | |||||||
4303 16 | I | |||||||
4336 16 | I | 3/2+,5/2+ | ||||||
4359 16 | I | |||||||
4380 16 | I | 3/2+,5/2+ | ||||||
4466 16 | I | |||||||
4492 16 | I | |||||||
4494.11 10 | CD F | 19/2- | 0.111 ps 28 | 926.12 6 1745 | 100 10 | (M1+E2) (E2) | 3567.97 2748.87 | 17/2- 15/2- |
4518 16 | I | |||||||
4541 16 | I | |||||||
4553 16 | I | |||||||
4588 16 | I | 7/2+,9/2+ | ||||||
4605 16 | I | |||||||
E(level) (keV) | XREF | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | I(γ) | M(γ) | Final Levels | |
4637 16 | IJ | 1/2- | ||||||
4670 16 | I | |||||||
4672.90 11 | C | 17/2- | 0.12 ps 6 | 678.95 8 1385 1924 | 100 33 17 | (M1(+E2)) (E2) D,E2 | 3993.94 3287.73 2748.87 | 15/2- 13/2- 15/2- |
4686 16 | I | 3/2+,5/2+ | ||||||
4708 11 | EF | - | ||||||
4743 16 | I | |||||||
4758 11 | EF | |||||||
4793 16 | I | |||||||
4811 16 | I | |||||||
4829 16 | I | |||||||
4847 16 | I | |||||||
4876 16 | I | |||||||
4898 16 | I | |||||||
4924 16 | I | 1/2-,3/2- | ||||||
4957 16 | I | 1/2+ | ||||||
4982 16 | I | 3/2+,5/2+ | ||||||
5013 16 | I | 1/2-,3/2- | ||||||
5043 16 | I | |||||||
5070 16 | I | |||||||
5102 16 | I | |||||||
5125 16 | I | |||||||
5148 16 | I | |||||||
5195 16 | I | |||||||
5197.44 11 | C F | 21/2- | 49 fs 35 | 703.32 5 1629.83 40 | 86 100 | (M1(+E2)) (E2) | 4494.11 3567.97 | 19/2- 17/2- |
5265 16 | I | 1/2+ | ||||||
5301 16 | I | |||||||
5313 16 | I | 1/2-,3/2- | ||||||
E(level) (keV) | XREF | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | I(γ) | M(γ) | Final Levels | |
5355 16 | G IJ | 1/2- | 5365 10 ? | | 0.0 | 5/2- | ||
5372 15 | E | 2807? | | 2572.9 | 1/2+ | |||
5407 16 | I | 1/2+ | ||||||
5433 16 | I | 1/2-,3/2- | ||||||
5451 | I | |||||||
5478 16 | I | |||||||
5540 16 | I | 1/2-,3/2- | ||||||
5580 16 | IJ | 1/2- | ||||||
5615 16 | I | 1/2-,3/2- | ||||||
5635 16 | I | |||||||
5670 16 | I | |||||||
5702 16 | I | |||||||
5746 4 ? | G | 3145 5 ? 3189 5 ? 3335 5 ? 3335 5 ? | | 2599.6 2548.2 2416.3 2406.2 | 3/2-,5/2,7/2 3/2- 1/2- TO 7/2- (9/2-) | |||
5755 16 ? | I | |||||||
5774 16 | I | |||||||
5810 16 | IJ | 1/2- | ||||||
5836 16 | I | |||||||
5872 16 | I | |||||||
5937 16 | I | |||||||
5976 16 | I | 1/2+ | ||||||
6013 | I | |||||||
6039 | I | 3/2+,5/2+ | ||||||
6067 | I | (1/2-,3/2-) | ||||||
6088.60 23 | C | 23/2- | 35 fs 21 | 891.13 20 1595 | 100 14 | (M1+E2) (E2) | 5197.44 4494.11 | 21/2- 19/2- |
6095 | I | |||||||
6129 | I | |||||||
E(level) (keV) | XREF | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | I(γ) | M(γ) | Final Levels | |
6158 | I | 1/2+ | ||||||
6169 | I | 1/2+ | ||||||
6195 | I | |||||||
6209 | I | |||||||
6234 | I | |||||||
6265 | I | |||||||
6304 | I | |||||||
6333 | I | 1/2-,3/2- | ||||||
6364 | I | |||||||
6366.4 6 | C | (21/2-) | < 28 fs | 1693.2 9 1873 2798 | 100 60 20 | D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 | 4672.90 4494.11 3567.97 | 17/2- 19/2- 17/2- |
6387 | I | |||||||
6402 | I | |||||||
6430 | I | 1/2+ | ||||||
6449 | I | |||||||
6474 | I | |||||||
6494 | I | 1/2+ | ||||||
6514 | I | |||||||
6530 15 | E I | - | ||||||
6554 | I | |||||||
6565 | I | |||||||
6585 | I | |||||||
6607 | I | (1/2+) | ||||||
6624 | I | |||||||
6645 | I | |||||||
6662 | I | |||||||
6673 | I | |||||||
6692 | I | |||||||
6709 | I | |||||||
E(level) (keV) | XREF | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | I(γ) | M(γ) | Final Levels | |
6727 | I | |||||||
6749 | I | |||||||
6771 | I | (1/2+) | ||||||
6787 | I | |||||||
6823 | I | |||||||
6838 | I | |||||||
6854 | E I | |||||||
6882 | E I | |||||||
6903 | I | |||||||
6917 | I | |||||||
6936 | I | |||||||
6957 | I | |||||||
6980 | I | |||||||
7002 | I | |||||||
7018 | I | |||||||
7038 | I | |||||||
7067 | I | |||||||
7076 | I | |||||||
7095 | I | |||||||
7123 | I | |||||||
7141 | I | |||||||
7166 | I | 3/2+,5/2+ | ||||||
7187 | I | 3/2+,5/2+ | ||||||
7205 | I | |||||||
7225 | I | |||||||
7349.0 7 | E N P | 7/2- | 4123 7189 | 67 100 | 3225.8 159.371 | 7/2- 7/2- | ||
7480.6 10 | E | - | 7480 | | 0.0 | 5/2- | ||
8005.1 3 | C | 27/2- | 0.49 ps 11 | 1916.45 20 | 100 | (E2(+M3)) | 6088.60 | 23/2- |
8.16E+3 2 | N P | (3/2)+ | ||||||
E(level) (keV) | XREF | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | I(γ) | M(γ) | Final Levels | |
8.79E+3 2 | N P | 1/2+ |
E(level): From least-squares fit to Eγ’s, including primary γ’s from (n,γ), except as noted in footnotes, comments, or cross reference column. ΔEγ=1 keV assumed where not given. Capture-state energy held fixed
Jπ(level): From angular momentum transfer in (d,p), except as noted. See these data for Jπ’s based on empirical J-dependence of L=1 and L=3 transfers. Angular momenta deduced from other stripping and pickup reaction data are consistent, except as noted
T1/2(level): From DSAM in (p,p’γ), (α,nγ), and (3He,αγ), except as noted.
E(level) (keV) | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) | I(γ) | M(γ) | Final Levels | |
Band 1 - yrast band | |||||||
0.0 | 5/2- | STABLE | |||||
159.371 12 | 7/2- | 210 ps 6 | 159.373 12 | 100 | M1+E2 | 0.0 | 5/2- |
1252.09 4 | 9/2- | 140 fs 13 | |||||
1444.25 4 | 11/2- | 0.90 ps 14 | 192.150 10 1284.86 4 | 6.2 100 | M1+E2 E2 | 1252.09 159.371 | 9/2- 7/2- |
2748.87 6 | 15/2- | 1.11 ps 21 | 1304.61 4 | 100 | E2 | 1444.25 | 11/2- |
3567.97 8 | 17/2- | 69 fs 21 | 819.09 5 | 100 | M1+E2 | 2748.87 | 15/2- |
4494.11 10 | 19/2- | 0.111 ps 28 | |||||
5197.44 11 | 21/2- | 49 fs 35 | 703.32 5 1629.83 40 | 86 100 | (M1(+E2)) (E2) | 4494.11 3567.97 | 19/2- 17/2- |
6088.60 23 | 23/2- | 35 fs 21 | 891.13 20 1595 | 100 14 | (M1+E2) (E2) | 5197.44 4494.11 | 21/2- 19/2- |
8005.1 3 | 27/2- | 0.49 ps 11 | 1916.45 20 | 100 | (E2(+M3)) | 6088.60 | 23/2- |
E(level) (keV) | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | Multipolarity | Mixing Ratio | Conversion Coefficient | Additional Data |
159.371 | 7/2- | 210 ps 6 | 159.373 12 | M1+E2 | -0.099 9 | 0.0045 | B(E2)(W.u.)=25 5, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0255 8, α=0.0045 3 |
1252.09 | 9/2- | 140 fs 13 | 1092.71 5 | M1+E2 | -0.29 3 | 7.89×10-5 | B(E2)(W.u.)=19 4, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.105 11, α=7.89E-5 12, α(K)=7.16E-5 11, α(L)=6.40E-6 10, α(M)=8.18E-7 12, α(N)=4.45E-8 7, α(N+)=4.45E-8 7 |
9/2- | 140 fs 13 | 1252.0 | E2 | 9.03×10-5 | B(E2)(W.u.)=7 3, α=9.03E-5 13, α(K)=6.52E-5 10, α(L)=5.83E-6 9, α(M)=7.46E-7 11, α(N)=4.05E-8 6, α(N+)=1.85E-5 3 | ||
1444.25 | 11/2- | 0.90 ps 14 | 192.150 10 | M1+E2 | +0.05 2 | 0.00364 | B(E2)(W.u.)=3.×101 3, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.20 4, α=0.00364 8, α(K)=0.00330 7, α(L)=0.000300 7, α(M)=3.84E-5 8, α(N)=2.06E-6 5, α(N+)=2.06E-6 5 |
11/2- | 0.90 ps 14 | 1284.86 4 | E2 | 9.33×10-5 | B(E2)(W.u.)=17 3, α=9.33E-5 13, α(K)=6.16E-5 9, α(L)=5.51E-6 8, α(M)=7.04E-7 10, α(N)=3.82E-8 6, α(N+)=2.55E-5 4 | ||
1549.65 | 3/2- | 1.5 ps 4 | 1390.33 10 | E2 | 0.0001090 | B(E2)(W.u.)=3.9 11, α=0.0001090 16, α(K)=5.20E-5 8, α(L)=4.65E-6 7, α(M)=5.94E-7 9, α(N)=3.23E-8 5, α(N+)=5.18E-5 8 | |
3/2- | 1.5 ps 4 | 1549.9 4 | M1+E2 | +0.46 10 | 1.26×10-4 | B(E2)(W.u.)=0.33 15, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0015 5, α=1.26E-4 3, α(K)=3.76E-5 7, α(L)=3.35E-6 6, α(M)=4.29E-7 7, α(N)=2.34E-8 4, α(N+)=8.50E-5 22 | |
1793.80 | 1/2- | 1.7 ps +17-6 | 244.27 16 | M1+E2 | -0.30 6 | 0.0027 | B(E2)(W.u.)=1.0×103 +6-10, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.27 +10-27, α=0.0027 3, α(K)=0.0025 3, α(L)=0.000225 24, α(M)=2.9E-5 3, α(N)=1.53E-6 16, α(N+)=1.53E-6 16 |
1/2- | 1.7 ps +17-6 | 1793.9 4 | (E2) | 0.000249 | B(E2)(W.u.)=1.2 +5-12, α=0.000249 4, α(K)=3.12E-5 5, α(L)=2.78E-6 4, α(M)=3.56E-7 5, α(N)=1.94E-8 3, α(N+)=0.000215 3 | ||
1825.0 | 3/2+,5/2+ | 2.1 ps +19-7 | 1825 | (E1+M2) | -0.25 +7-2 | 5.09×10-4 | B(E1)(W.u.)=3.8E-5 +13-35, B(M2)(W.u.)=3.3 +21-4, α=5.09E-4 13, α(K)=1.90E-5 9, α(L)=1.69E-6 8, α(M)=2.16E-7 11, α(N)=1.18E-8 6, α(N+)=0.000488 14 |
2163.2 | 3/2- | 25.1 fs 43 | 2003.1 10 | (E2) | 0.000343 | B(E2)(W.u.)=3.6 8, α=0.000343 5, α(K)=2.54E-5 4, α(L)=2.27E-6 4, α(M)=2.90E-7 4, α(N)=1.578E-8 23, α(N+)=0.000315 5 | |
3/2- | 25.1 fs 43 | 2163.0 5 | (M1(+E2)) | 0.0 1 | 0.000342 | B(M1)(W.u.)=0.082 15, α=0.000342 5, α(K)=2.07×10-5 3, α(L)=1.84E-6 3, α(M)=2.36E-7 4, α(N)=1.285E-8 18, α(N+)=0.000319 5 | |
2166.7 | 5/2 | 19 fs 5 | 2007.3 10 | D(+Q) | 0.00 17 | ||
2259.5 | 5/2+ | 0.54 ps 12 | 2101 | (E1(+M2)) | 0.24 LE | 7.07×10-4 | B(E1)(W.u.)=1.9E-5 6, α=7.07E-4 22, α(K)=1.48E-5 9, α(L)=1.31E-6 8, α(M)=1.68E-7 10, α(N)=9.1E-9 6, α(N+)=0.000690 22 |
5/2+ | 0.54 ps 12 | 2259.7 | (E1(+M2)) | 0.129 LE | 8.24×10-4 | B(E1)(W.u.)=6.8E-5 16, α=8.24E-4 13, α(K)=1.28E-5 3, α(L)=1.135E-6 24, α(M)=1.45E-7 3, α(N)=7.91E-9 17, α(N+)=0.000810 13 | |
2297.1 | 5/2-,7/2- | < 10 fs | 2137 | (M1+E2) | 0.00037 | α=0.00037 4, α(K)=2.19×10-5 9, α(L)=1.95E-6 8, α(M)=2.49E-7 10, α(N)=1.36E-8 5, α(N+)=0.00034 4 | |
5/2-,7/2- | < 10 fs | 2297 | (M1,E2) | 0.00044 | α=0.00044 5, α(K)=1.93×10-5 7, α(L)=1.72E-6 6, α(M)=2.20E-7 8, α(N)=1.20E-8 4, α(N+)=0.00042 5 | ||
2406.2 | (9/2-) | 23 fs 7 | 2406 | (E2) | 0.000532 | B(E2)(W.u.)=2.7 13, α=0.000532 8, α(K)=1.84E-5 3, α(L)=1.638E-6 23, α(M)=2.10E-7 3, α(N)=1.142E-8 16, α(N+)=0.000512 8 | |
2548.2 | 3/2- | 6.2 fs 7 | 2548.7 5 | (M1(+E2)) | 0.5 LT | 5.12×10-4 | B(M1)(W.u.)>0.15 0.24, α=5.12×10-4 12, α(K)=1.593E-5 24, α(L)=1.417E-6 22, α(M)=1.81E-7 3, α(N)=9.89E-9 15, α(N+)=0.000494 12 |
2572.9 | 1/2+ | 0.53 ps +22-14 | 1023 | (E1(+M2)) | 0.019 LE | 5.05×10-5 | B(E1)(W.u.)=6.7E-4 +19-28, α=5.05E-5 7, α(K)=4.59E-5 7, α(L)=4.09E-6 6, α(M)=5.23E-7 8, α(N)=2.84E-8 4, α(N+)=2.84E-8 4 |
2668.0 | 9/2,13/2 | 21 fs 16 | 1224 | D+Q | -0.14 2 | ||
2682.30 | 11/2(-) | > 2.10 ps | 1430.22 4 | D(+Q) | 0.00 2 | ||
2748.87 | 15/2- | 1.11 ps 21 | 1304.61 4 | E2 | 9.56×10-5 | B(E2)(W.u.)=13 3, α=9.56E-5 14, α(K)=5.96E-5 9, α(L)=5.33E-6 8, α(M)=6.81E-7 10, α(N)=3.70E-8 6, α(N+)=3.00E-5 5 | |
3251.6 | 7/2- | 29 fs 9 | 1808 | (E2) | 0.000255 | B(E2)(W.u.)=29 10, α=0.000255 4, α(K)=3.08E-5 5, α(L)=2.74E-6 4, α(M)=3.51E-7 5, α(N)=1.91E-8 3, α(N+)=0.000222 4 | |
3287.73 | 13/2- | 0.51 ps +16-10 | 605.47 5 | (M1(+E2)) | -0.00 4 | 0.000255 | B(M1)(W.u.)=0.055 +11-18, α=0.000255 4, α(K)=0.000231 4, α(L)=2.08×10-5 3, α(M)=2.65E-6 4, α(N)=1.440E-7 21, α(N+)=1.440E-7 21 |
13/2- | 0.51 ps +16-10 | 1843.36 6 | (M1(+E2)) | -0.00 6 | 0.000216 | B(M1)(W.u.)=0.044 +9-14, α=0.000216 4, α(K)=2.71×10-5 4, α(L)=2.41E-6 4, α(M)=3.09E-7 5, α(N)=1.684E-8 24, α(N+)=0.000186 3 | |
13/2- | 0.51 ps +16-10 | 2037 | (E2) | 0.000359 | B(E2)(W.u.)=0.22 +5-7, α=0.000359 6, α(K)=2.47E-5 4, α(L)=2.20E-6 3, α(M)=2.81E-7 4, α(N)=1.531E-8 22, α(N+)=0.000332 5 | ||
E(level) (keV) | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | Multipolarity | Mixing Ratio | Conversion Coefficient | Additional Data |
3484.5 | (3/2-) | 30 fs 10 | 3325 | (E2) | 0.000931 | B(E2)(W.u.)=4.6 16, α=0.000931 14, α(K)=1.087E-5 16, α(L)=9.66E-7 14, α(M)=1.236E-7 18, α(N)=6.74E-9 10, α(N+)=0.000919 13 | |
3567.97 | 17/2- | 69 fs 21 | 819.09 5 | M1+E2 | -0.16 9 | 1.38×10-4 | B(E2)(W.u.)=60 +70-60, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.57 18, α=1.38E-4 3, α(K)=0.000125 3, α(L)=1.120E-5 24, α(M)=1.43E-6 3, α(N)=7.79E-8 17, α(N+)=7.79E-8 17 |
3827.1 | 7/2- | 17 fs 9 | 2383 | (E2) | 0.000521 | B(E2)(W.u.)=43 23, α=0.000521 8, α(K)=1.87E-5 3, α(L)=1.665E-6 24, α(M)=2.13E-7 3, α(N)=1.161E-8 17, α(N+)=0.000500 7 | |
3993.94 | 15/2- | 0.10 ps +8-5 | 267 | (M1(+E2)) | 0.015 LE | 0.001620 | B(M1)(W.u.)=0.12 +12-5, α=0.001620 23, α(K)=0.001466 21, α(L)=0.0001327 19, α(M)=1.697×10-5 24, α(N)=9.14E-7 13, α(N+)=9.14E-7 13 |
15/2- | 0.10 ps +8-5 | 706.21 5 | (M1(+E2)) | 0.00024 | B(M1)(W.u.)=0.6 +3-5, α=0.00024 6, α(K)=0.00022 6, α(L)=2.0×10-5 5, α(M)=2.5E-6 7, α(N)=1.4E-7 4, α(N+)=1.4E-7 4 | ||
15/2- | 0.10 ps +8-5 | 2550 | (E2) | 0.000599 | B(E2)(W.u.)=0.6 +3-5, α=0.000599 9, α(K)=1.667E-5 24, α(L)=1.484E-6 21, α(M)=1.90E-7 3, α(N)=1.034E-8 15, α(N+)=0.000580 9 | ||
4494.11 | 19/2- | 0.111 ps 28 | 926.12 6 | (M1+E2) | -0.05 4 | 1.07×10-4 | B(E2)(W.u.)=1.70 +272-17, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.23 6, α=1.07E-4 2, α(K)=9.69E-5 14, α(L)=8.66E-6 13, α(M)=1.108E-6 16, α(N)=6.03E-8 9, α(N+)=6.03E-8 9 |
19/2- | 0.111 ps 28 | 1745 | (E2) | 0.000229 | B(E2)(W.u.)=2.8 8, α=0.000229 4, α(K)=3.29E-5 5, α(L)=2.94E-6 5, α(M)=3.76E-7 6, α(N)=2.04E-8 3, α(N+)=0.000193 3 | ||
4672.90 | 17/2- | 0.12 ps 6 | 678.95 8 | (M1(+E2)) | 0.021 LE | 0.000200 | BM1=0.39 20, α=0.000200 3, α(K)=0.000182 3, α(L)=1.629×10-5 23, α(M)=2.08E-6 3, α(N)=1.132E-7 16, α(N+)=1.132E-7 16 |
17/2- | 0.12 ps 6 | 1385 | (E2) | 1.08×10-4 | B(E2)(W.u.)=20 11, α=1.08E-4, α(K)=5.25E-5 8, α(L)=4.68E-6 7, α(M)=5.99E-7 9, α(N)=3.25E-8 5, α(N+)=5.03E-5 7 | ||
5197.44 | 21/2- | 49 fs 35 | 703.32 5 | (M1(+E2)) | 0.00022 | B(M1)(W.u.)=0.6 5, α=0.00022 9, α(K)=0.00020 8, α(L)=0.000018, α(M)=2.25×10-6 10, α(N)=1.22E-7 5, α(N+)=1.22E-7 5 | |
21/2- | 49 fs 35 | 1629.83 40 | (E2) | 0.000183 | B(E2)(W.u.)=5.×101 4, α=0.000183 3, α(K)=3.76E-5 6, α(L)=3.36E-6 5, α(M)=4.29E-7 6, α(N)=2.33E-8 4, α(N+)=0.0001416 20 | ||
6088.60 | 23/2- | 35 fs 21 | 891.13 20 | (M1+E2) | -0.09 8 | 1.15×10-4 | B(E2)(W.u.)=20.1 +375-20, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.8 5, α=1.15E-4 2, α(K)=0.0001048 17, α(L)=9.37E-6 16, α(M)=1.199E-6 20, α(N)=6.52E-8 11, α(N+)=6.52E-8 11 |
23/2- | 35 fs 21 | 1595 | (E2) | 0.0001700 | B(E2)(W.u.)=19 12, α=0.0001700 24, α(K)=3.93E-5 6, α(L)=3.50E-6 5, α(M)=4.48E-7 7, α(N)=2.44E-8 4, α(N+)=0.0001266 18 | ||
8005.1 | 27/2- | 0.49 ps 11 | 1916.45 20 | (E2(+M3)) | -0.0 3 | 3.03×10-4 | B(E2)(W.u.)=4.4 10, α=3.03E-4 15, α(K)=2.8E-5 4, α(L)=2.5E-6 4, α(M)=3.1E-7 4, α(N)=1.71E-8 23, α(N+)=0.000273 18 |
Additional Level Data and Comments:
E(level) | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | Comments |
0.0 | 5/2- | STABLE | μ=-0.78848 1 (2005St24,1965Dr03,1953Je16), Q=+0.30 2 (2005St24,1990Ay01), T=3/2 E(level): From (40Ca,3pγ). yrast band. |
159.371 | 7/2- | 210 ps 6 | μ=-1.9 6 (2005St24,1977Bu10), T=3/2 E(level): From (40Ca,3pγ). yrast band. Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). |
1252.09 | 9/2- | 140 fs 13 | E(level): From (40Ca,3pγ). yrast band. |
1444.25 | 11/2- | 0.90 ps 14 | E(level): From (40Ca,3pγ). yrast band. From (14C,3nγ). Jπ(level): From γ(θ) and RUL of deexciting γ. T1/2(level): From (14C,3nγ). T1/2 by DSAM. |
1549.65 | 3/2- | 1.5 ps 4 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). |
1793.80 | 1/2- | 1.7 ps +17-6 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). |
1825.0 | 3/2+,5/2+ | 2.1 ps +19-7 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). |
2163.2 | 3/2- | 25.1 fs 43 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). |
2166.7 | 5/2 | 19 fs 5 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
2259.5 | 5/2+ | 0.54 ps 12 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
2297.1 | 5/2-,7/2- | < 10 fs | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). |
2364.9 | 1/2+ | > 1.53 ps | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
2406.2 | (9/2-) | 23 fs 7 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). Connected by a J|)J or J|)J-2, presumably stretched E2; 3727 decays weakly to yrast 9/2-. |
2416.3 | 1/2- TO 7/2- | 1.0 ps +6-3 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). |
2525.8 | 3/2-,5/2- | 94 fs 19 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
2548.2 | 3/2- | 6.2 fs 7 | XREF: γ(2554). E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). |
2572.9 | 1/2+ | 0.53 ps +22-14 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
2599.6 | 3/2-,5/2,7/2 | 1.3 ps +5-3 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). L(d,p)=3 for multiplet. |
2619.4 | 7/2- | 29 fs 8 | E(level): Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). L(d,p)=3 for multiplet. |
2668.0 | 9/2,13/2 | 21 fs 16 | E(level): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). |
2682.30 | 11/2(-) | > 2.10 ps | E(level): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. |
2748.87 | 15/2- | 1.11 ps 21 | E(level): From (40Ca,3pγ). yrast band. From (14C,3nγ). Jπ(level): From γ(θ) and RUL of deexciting γ. T1/2(level): From (14C,3nγ). T1/2 by DSAM. |
2757.6 | 7/2- TO 13/2- | 17 fs 11 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). |
2785.1 | 3/2 TO 9/2 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). | |
2793.2 | 1/2- | Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). | |
E(level) | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | Comments |
2800.2 | 0.35 ps +26-16 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). L(3He,α)=3 for multiplet. L(p,d)=3 for multiplet. | |
2809.5 | 5/2-,7/2,9/2- | 49 fs 23 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): L(3He,α)=3 for multiplet. L(p,d)=3 for multiplet. |
2828.5 | 1/2- TO 7/2 | 0.16 ps 5 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). L(d,p)=3 for multiplet. L(3He,α)=3 for multiplet. L(p,d)=3 for multiplet. |
2838.9 | 3/2- TO 9/2- | < 33 fs | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). L(d,p)=3 for multiplet. |
2846.3 | 5/2- TO 11/2- | < 19 fs | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). L(d,p)=3 for multiplet. |
3033.1 | 5/2-,7/2 | 0.41 ps 9 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
3051.5 | 5/2- TO 11/2- | 0.43 ps +12-9 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
3176.0 | 3/2-,5/2+ | 0.23 ps +10-7 | Possible doublet. E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). |
3225.8 | 7/2- | 7 fs +7-6 | T=3/2 Antianalog state. E(level): Antianalog state. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): L(3He,p)=0 or 0+2. |
3251.6 | 7/2- | 29 fs 9 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
3277.7 | 3/2- | 42 fs 22 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). |
3287.73 | 13/2- | 0.51 ps +16-10 | E(level): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. d or d,E2 γ to Ji-1 state; high selection of yrast states in fusion-evaporation and restrictions on γ(θ) (Cf. 1985Wa09). π=- from d,E2 γ to Ji-2,π=-. |
3368.9 | 7/2-,9/2,11/2- | 0.19 ps 6 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
3400.5 | 7/2- TO 13/2 | 1.4 ps +10-4 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). |
3434.6 | 1/2- TO 7/2 | 65 fs 22 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). |
3484.5 | (3/2-) | 30 fs 10 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
3515.5 | 1/2+ | 40 fs 12 | Possibly a doublet since d,E2 γ? to 5/2- is not consistent with L(d,p)=0. E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). |
3544.8 | 3/2-,5/2+ | < 35 fs | Possible doublet. E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): L(d,p)=1 for multiplet. |
3553.6 | 3/2- TO 11/2- | 35 fs +38-33 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): L(d,p)=1 for multiplet. |
3567.97 | 17/2- | 69 fs 21 | E(level): From (40Ca,3pγ). yrast band. From (14C,3nγ). Jπ(level): From γ(θ) and RUL of deexciting γ. T1/2(level): From (14C,3nγ). T1/2 by DSAM. |
3582.7 | (3/2-) | < 15 fs | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
3622.5 | 5/2- TO 13/2- | 20 fs 19 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
3676.1 | 3/2- | < 40 fs | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). |
3701.8 | 7/2,9/2,11/2,13/2- | 24 fs +24-22 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). |
3724 | E(level): From β+ decay. From (d,p). | ||
E(level) | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | Comments |
3727.1 | (13/2-) | Jπ(level): Connected by a J|)J or J|)J-2, presumably stretched E2; 3727 decays weakly to yrast 9/2-. | |
3780.0 | 3/2(-) TO 9/2- | 44 fs 19 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). |
3827.1 | 7/2- | 17 fs 9 | E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. |
3923 | 3/2- | Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). | |
3993.94 | 15/2- | 0.10 ps +8-5 | E(level): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. Jπ(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. d or d,E2 γ to Ji-1 state; high selection of yrast states in fusion-evaporation and restrictions on γ(θ) (Cf. 1985Wa09). π=- from d,E2 γ to Ji-2,π=-. T1/2(level): From (14C,3nγ). T1/2 by DSAM. |
4243 | Jπ(level): L(3He,p)=0+2, 4252, state may correspond to this or the following state. | ||
4264 | Jπ(level): L(3He,p)=0+2, 4252, state may correspond to this or the following state. | ||
4494.11 | 19/2- | 0.111 ps 28 | E(level): From (40Ca,3pγ). yrast band. T1/2(level): From (14C,3nγ). T1/2 by DSAM. |
4637 | 1/2- | E(level): From β+ decay. From (d,p). Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). | |
4672.90 | 17/2- | 0.12 ps 6 | E(level): NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. Jπ(level): NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. d or d,E2 γ to Ji-1 state; high selection of yrast states in fusion-evaporation and restrictions on γ(θ) (Cf. 1985Wa09). π=- from d,E2 γ to Ji-2,π=-. T1/2(level): From (14C,3nγ). T1/2 by DSAM. |
4708 | - | Jπ(level): L(3He,p)=0 or 0+2. | |
5197.44 | 21/2- | 49 fs 35 | E(level): From (40Ca,3pγ). yrast band. T1/2(level): From (14C,3nγ). T1/2 by DSAM. |
5355 | 1/2- | E(level): From β+ decay. From (d,p). Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). | |
5372 | E(level): From (3He,p) and (3He,pγ). | ||
5580 | 1/2- | E(level): From β+ decay. From (d,p). Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). | |
5810 | 1/2- | E(level): From β+ decay. From (d,p). Jπ(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). | |
6088.60 | 23/2- | 35 fs 21 | E(level): From (40Ca,3pγ). yrast band. T1/2(level): From (14C,3nγ). T1/2 by DSAM. |
6366.4 | (21/2-) | < 28 fs | E(level): NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. Jπ(level): NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. T1/2(level): From (14C,3nγ). T1/2 by DSAM. |
6530 | - | E(level): From (3He,p) and (3He,pγ). Jπ(level): L(3He,p)=0 or 0+2. | |
7349.0 | 7/2- | T=5/2 Analog of 47Sc g.s., 7/2-. E(level): From (3He,p) and (3He,pγ). Jπ(level): L(3He,p)=0 or 0+2. | |
7480.6 | - | E(level): From (3He,p) and (3He,pγ). Jπ(level): L(3He,p)=0 or 0+2. | |
8005.1 | 27/2- | 0.49 ps 11 | E(level): From (40Ca,3pγ). yrast band. T1/2(level): From (14C,3nγ). T1/2 by DSAM. |
8.16E+3 | (3/2)+ | T=5/2 E(level): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively. Jπ(level): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively. | |
8.79E+3 | 1/2+ | T=5/2 E(level): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively. Jπ(level): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively. |
E(level) | E(gamma) | Comments |
159.371 | 159.373 | E(γ): weighted av of 159.381 15 from β- decay, 159.369 20 from from (12C,3nγ) and 159.27 4 from (n,γ). Arithmetic mean of 159.370 12 (NRM) and 159.375 12 (RT) adopted. I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) |
1252.09 | 1092.71 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. I(γ): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ) | 1252.0 | E(γ): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. I(γ): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (3He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (40Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. M(γ): From γ(θ) in (3He,αγ) and comparison to RUL |
1444.25 | 192.150 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ). Iγ(192γ)/Iγ(1285γ)=0.129 3 and Iγ(703γ)/Iγ(1630γ)=3.1 9 in (14C,3nγ) discrepant M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ) | 1284.86 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ). I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ). Iγ(192γ)/Iγ(1285γ)=0.129 3 and Iγ(703γ)/Iγ(1630γ)=3.1 9 in (14C,3nγ) discrepant M(γ): J|)J or J|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ). Ne M2 from comparison to RUL |
1549.65 | 1390.33 | E(γ): from (n,γ),(pol n,γ) E=thermal I(γ): From β+ decay | 1549.9 | E(γ): From β+ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β+ decay M(γ): From γ(θ) in (3He,αγ) and comparison to RUL |
1793.80 | 244.27 | E(γ): From (n,γ) I(γ): From β+ decay | 1793.9 | E(γ): From β+ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β+ decay M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme |
1825.0 | 1825 | M(γ): D+Q from γ(θ) in (3He,αγ). Δπ=yes from level scheme |
2163.2 | 2003.1 | E(γ): From β+ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β+ decay M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme | 2163.0 | E(γ): From β+ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β+ decay M(γ): d(+Q) from γ(θ) in (3He,αγ). Δπ=no from level scheme |
2166.7 | 2007.3 | E(γ): From β+ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β+ decay |
2259.5 | 2101 | E(γ): From (3He,p) and (3He,pγ) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=yes from level scheme | 2259.7 | E(γ): From (3He,p) and (3He,pγ) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=yes from level scheme |
2297.1 | 2297 | M(γ): d,E2 from σ(96|’)/σ(126|’) in (γ,γ’) and comparison to RUL. Δπ=no from level scheme |
2406.2 | 962 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively I(γ): Iγ(962γ):Iγ(1154γ):Iγ(2247γ)=0.3:3:1 from (40Ca,3pγ) discrepant M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1154 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively I(γ): Iγ(962γ):Iγ(1154γ):Iγ(2247γ)=0.3:3:1 from (40Ca,3pγ) discrepant M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2247 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively I(γ): Iγ(962γ):Iγ(1154γ):Iγ(2247γ)=0.3:3:1 from (40Ca,3pγ) discrepant M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2406 | M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme |
2416.3 | 591 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 866 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2416 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
2525.8 | 2366.3 | E(γ): From β+ decay. From (d,p). E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively I(γ): From β+ decay M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2525.6 | E(γ): From β+ decay. From (d,p). E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively I(γ): From β+ decay M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
E(level) | E(gamma) | Comments |
2548.2 | 2548.7 | E(γ): From β+ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β+ decay M(γ): d(+Q) from σ(96|’)/σ(126|’) in (γ,γ’). Δπ=no from level scheme |
2572.9 | 748 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1023 | E(γ): From (3He,p) and (3He,pγ) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=yes from level scheme |
2599.6 | 775 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2441 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2600 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
2619.4 | 452 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1367 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2460 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2619 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
2682.30 | 276 | E(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) | 1238 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ). I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): J|)J or J|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ) | 1430.22 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ) |
2748.87 | 1304.61 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ). I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): J|)J or J|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ). Ne M2 from comparison to RUL |
2757.6 | 1314 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1506 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
2793.2 | 1243.5 | E(γ): From β+ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β+ decay | 2793.3 | E(γ): From β+ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β+ decay |
2800.2 | 2800 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
2809.5 | 1558 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2810 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
2828.5 | 412 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1003 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2828 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
2838.9 | 2680 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2839 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
E(level) | E(gamma) | Comments |
2846.3 | 1594 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2687 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
2855 | 2855 | E(γ): From (n,γ) |
3033.1 | 773 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1781 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2874 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 3033 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3051.5 | 267 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1800 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3176.0 | 760 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 811 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1013 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1351 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 3017 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 3176 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3251.6 | 955 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1808 | M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme | 3093 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 3252 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3277.7 | 1113 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1728 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3287.73 | 605.47 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): d(+Q) from γ(θ) in (α,nγ). Δπ=no from level scheme. Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ) | 1843.36 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ). d(+Q) from γ(θ) in (14C,3nγ). Δπ=no from level scheme | 2037 | E(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme |
3368.9 | 1925 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 3210 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
E(level) | E(gamma) | Comments |
3400.5 | 348 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 718 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1956 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3434.6 | 1610 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 3435 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3484.5 | 3325 | M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme |
3515.5 | 1151 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1691 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 3516 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Discrepant with ΔJπ=2,yes from level scheme. From comparison to RUL |
3544.8 | 1180 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 1720 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 3386 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 3545 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3553.6 | 3395 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3567.97 | 819.09 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ). From γ(θ) in (14C,3nγ). δ given for adopted J’s |
3582.7 | 3424 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3622.5 | 2370 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3676.1 | 3676 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3701.8 | 1034 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2450 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3727.1 | 1321 | E(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): J|)J or J|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ) | 2475 | E(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) |
3780.0 | 3621 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 3780 | E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
3827.1 | 2383 | M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme |
E(level) | E(gamma) | Comments |
3923 | 3925 | E(γ): From (n,γ). Held fixed in least-squares adjustment I(γ): From (n,γ) M(γ): from γγ(θ) in (n,γ) |
3993.94 | 267 | E(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): d from comparison to RUL. Δπ=no from level scheme | 706.21 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ). d(+Q) from γ(θ) in (14C,3nγ). Δπ=no from level scheme | 2550 | E(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme |
4494.11 | 926.12 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): D+Q from γ(θ) in (12C,3nγ). Δπ=no from level scheme. Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ) | 1745 | E(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): J|)J or J|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ). Ne M2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme |
4672.90 | 678.95 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ). d(+Q) from γ(θ) in (14C,3nγ). Δπ=no from level scheme | 1385 | E(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): J|)J or J|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ). Ne M2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme | 1924 | E(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ). E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
5197.44 | 703.32 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ). Iγ(192γ)/Iγ(1285γ)=0.129 3 and Iγ(703γ)/Iγ(1630γ)=3.1 9 in (14C,3nγ) discrepant M(γ): d(+Q) from γ(θ) in (14C,3nγ). Δπ=yes from level scheme. Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ). Stretched dipole from γ(θ) in (14C,3nγ) | 1629.83 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ). I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ). Iγ(192γ)/Iγ(1285γ)=0.129 3 and Iγ(703γ)/Iγ(1630γ)=3.1 9 in (14C,3nγ) discrepant M(γ): J|)J or J|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ). Ne M2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme |
5355 | 5365 | E(γ): From (n,γ) |
5372 | 2807 | E(γ): From (3He,pγ). ≈50% of the decay from the 7346-keV state has not been observed |
5746 | 3145 | E(γ): From (n,γ) | 3189 | E(γ): From (n,γ) | 3335 | E(γ): Multiply placed. From (n,γ) | 3335 | E(γ): Multiply placed. From (n,γ) |
6088.60 | 891.13 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): D+Q from γ(θ) in (14C,3nγ). Δπ=yes from level scheme. Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ). Stretched dipole from γ(θ) in (14C,3nγ) | 1595 | E(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme |
6366.4 | 1693.2 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ). I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): J|)J or J|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (40Ca,3pγ). Ne M2 from comparison to RUL | 1873 | E(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ). E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL | 2798 | E(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ). E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (3He,α). Analog states of 47Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2+, respectively I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL |
7349.0 | 4123 | E(γ): From (3He,pγ). ≈50% of the decay from the 7346-keV state has not been observed I(γ): From (3He,pγ). ≈50% of the decay from the 7346-keV state has not been observed | 7189 | E(γ): From (3He,pγ). ≈50% of the decay from the 7346-keV state has not been observed I(γ): From (3He,pγ). ≈50% of the decay from the 7346-keV state has not been observed |
7480.6 | 7480 | E(γ): From (3He,pγ). ≈50% of the decay from the 7346-keV state has not been observed |
E(level) | E(gamma) | Comments |
8005.1 | 1916.45 | E(γ): From (14C,3nγ). I(γ): From (40Ca,3pγ) |
Levels: Resonance parameters: see 2006MuZX
Levels: See (d,p) for possible states not confirmed by other work
Gammas: See (n,γ), (γ,γ’), (n,n’γ), and (p,p’γ) for unplaced gammas or gammas whose placement was considered uncertain. See also (3He,pγ) for additional gammas whose placement was considered uncertain
Q-value: Note: Current evaluation has used the following Q record -2930.34 308880.2929 10462.2 7 -8948.7 8 2003Au03