List of levels for 47TI

Author: T. W. Burrows | Citation: Nucl. Data Sheets 108, 923 (2007) | Cutoff date: 20-Feb-2007

E(level) (keV)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	Multipolarity	Mixing Ratio	Conversion Coefficient	Additional Data
159.371	7/2-	210 ps 6	159.373 12	M1+E2	-0.099 9	0.0045	B(E2)(W.u.)=25 5, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0255 8, α=0.0045 3
1252.09	9/2-	140 fs 13	1092.71 5	M1+E2	-0.29 3	7.89×10^-5	B(E2)(W.u.)=19 4, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.105 11, α=7.89E-5 12, α(K)=7.16E-5 11, α(L)=6.40E-6 10, α(M)=8.18E-7 12, α(N)=4.45E-8 7, α(N+)=4.45E-8 7
1252.09	9/2-	140 fs 13	1252.0	E2		9.03×10^-5	B(E2)(W.u.)=7 3, α=9.03E-5 13, α(K)=6.52E-5 10, α(L)=5.83E-6 9, α(M)=7.46E-7 11, α(N)=4.05E-8 6, α(N+)=1.85E-5 3
1444.25	11/2-	0.90 ps 14	192.150 10	M1+E2	+0.05 2	0.00364	B(E2)(W.u.)=3.×10¹ 3, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.20 4, α=0.00364 8, α(K)=0.00330 7, α(L)=0.000300 7, α(M)=3.84E-5 8, α(N)=2.06E-6 5, α(N+)=2.06E-6 5
1444.25	11/2-	0.90 ps 14	1284.86 4	E2		9.33×10^-5	B(E2)(W.u.)=17 3, α=9.33E-5 13, α(K)=6.16E-5 9, α(L)=5.51E-6 8, α(M)=7.04E-7 10, α(N)=3.82E-8 6, α(N+)=2.55E-5 4
1549.65	3/2-	1.5 ps 4	1390.33 10	E2		0.0001090	B(E2)(W.u.)=3.9 11, α=0.0001090 16, α(K)=5.20E-5 8, α(L)=4.65E-6 7, α(M)=5.94E-7 9, α(N)=3.23E-8 5, α(N+)=5.18E-5 8
1549.65	3/2-	1.5 ps 4	1549.9 4	M1+E2	+0.46 10	1.26×10^-4	B(E2)(W.u.)=0.33 15, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.0015 5, α=1.26E-4 3, α(K)=3.76E-5 7, α(L)=3.35E-6 6, α(M)=4.29E-7 7, α(N)=2.34E-8 4, α(N+)=8.50E-5 22
1793.80	1/2-	1.7 ps +17-6	244.27 16	M1+E2	-0.30 6	0.0027	B(E2)(W.u.)=1.0×10³ +6-10, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.27 +10-27, α=0.0027 3, α(K)=0.0025 3, α(L)=0.000225 24, α(M)=2.9E-5 3, α(N)=1.53E-6 16, α(N+)=1.53E-6 16
1793.80	1/2-	1.7 ps +17-6	1793.9 4	(E2)		0.000249	B(E2)(W.u.)=1.2 +5-12, α=0.000249 4, α(K)=3.12E-5 5, α(L)=2.78E-6 4, α(M)=3.56E-7 5, α(N)=1.94E-8 3, α(N+)=0.000215 3
1825.0	3/2+,5/2+	2.1 ps +19-7	1825	(E1+M2)	-0.25 +7-2	5.09×10^-4	B(E1)(W.u.)=3.8E-5 +13-35, B(M2)(W.u.)=3.3 +21-4, α=5.09E-4 13, α(K)=1.90E-5 9, α(L)=1.69E-6 8, α(M)=2.16E-7 11, α(N)=1.18E-8 6, α(N+)=0.000488 14
2163.2	3/2-	25.1 fs 43	2003.1 10	(E2)		0.000343	B(E2)(W.u.)=3.6 8, α=0.000343 5, α(K)=2.54E-5 4, α(L)=2.27E-6 4, α(M)=2.90E-7 4, α(N)=1.578E-8 23, α(N+)=0.000315 5
2163.2	3/2-	25.1 fs 43	2163.0 5	(M1(+E2))	0.0 1	0.000342	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.082 15, α=0.000342 5, α(K)=2.07×10^-5 3, α(L)=1.84E-6 3, α(M)=2.36E-7 4, α(N)=1.285E-8 18, α(N+)=0.000319 5
2166.7	5/2	19 fs 5	2007.3 10	D(+Q)	0.00 17
2259.5	5/2+	0.54 ps 12	2101	(E1(+M2))	0.24 LE	7.07×10^-4	B(E1)(W.u.)=1.9E-5 6, α=7.07E-4 22, α(K)=1.48E-5 9, α(L)=1.31E-6 8, α(M)=1.68E-7 10, α(N)=9.1E-9 6, α(N+)=0.000690 22
2259.5	5/2+	0.54 ps 12	2259.7	(E1(+M2))	0.129 LE	8.24×10^-4	B(E1)(W.u.)=6.8E-5 16, α=8.24E-4 13, α(K)=1.28E-5 3, α(L)=1.135E-6 24, α(M)=1.45E-7 3, α(N)=7.91E-9 17, α(N+)=0.000810 13
2297.1	5/2-,7/2-	< 10 fs	2137	(M1+E2)		0.00037	α=0.00037 4, α(K)=2.19×10^-5 9, α(L)=1.95E-6 8, α(M)=2.49E-7 10, α(N)=1.36E-8 5, α(N+)=0.00034 4
2297.1	5/2-,7/2-	< 10 fs	2297	(M1,E2)		0.00044	α=0.00044 5, α(K)=1.93×10^-5 7, α(L)=1.72E-6 6, α(M)=2.20E-7 8, α(N)=1.20E-8 4, α(N+)=0.00042 5
2406.2	(9/2-)	23 fs 7	2406	(E2)		0.000532	B(E2)(W.u.)=2.7 13, α=0.000532 8, α(K)=1.84E-5 3, α(L)=1.638E-6 23, α(M)=2.10E-7 3, α(N)=1.142E-8 16, α(N+)=0.000512 8
2548.2	3/2-	6.2 fs 7	2548.7 5	(M1(+E2))	0.5 LT	5.12×10^-4	B(M1)(W.u.)>0.15 0.24, α=5.12×10^-4 12, α(K)=1.593E-5 24, α(L)=1.417E-6 22, α(M)=1.81E-7 3, α(N)=9.89E-9 15, α(N+)=0.000494 12
2572.9	1/2+	0.53 ps +22-14	1023	(E1(+M2))	0.019 LE	5.05×10^-5	B(E1)(W.u.)=6.7E-4 +19-28, α=5.05E-5 7, α(K)=4.59E-5 7, α(L)=4.09E-6 6, α(M)=5.23E-7 8, α(N)=2.84E-8 4, α(N+)=2.84E-8 4
2668.0	9/2,13/2	21 fs 16	1224	D+Q	-0.14 2
2682.30	11/2(-)	> 2.10 ps	1430.22 4	D(+Q)	0.00 2
2748.87	15/2-	1.11 ps 21	1304.61 4	E2		9.56×10^-5	B(E2)(W.u.)=13 3, α=9.56E-5 14, α(K)=5.96E-5 9, α(L)=5.33E-6 8, α(M)=6.81E-7 10, α(N)=3.70E-8 6, α(N+)=3.00E-5 5
3251.6	7/2-	29 fs 9	1808	(E2)		0.000255	B(E2)(W.u.)=29 10, α=0.000255 4, α(K)=3.08E-5 5, α(L)=2.74E-6 4, α(M)=3.51E-7 5, α(N)=1.91E-8 3, α(N+)=0.000222 4
3287.73	13/2-	0.51 ps +16-10	605.47 5	(M1(+E2))	-0.00 4	0.000255	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.055 +11-18, α=0.000255 4, α(K)=0.000231 4, α(L)=2.08×10^-5 3, α(M)=2.65E-6 4, α(N)=1.440E-7 21, α(N+)=1.440E-7 21
	13/2-	0.51 ps +16-10	1843.36 6	(M1(+E2))	-0.00 6	0.000216	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.044 +9-14, α=0.000216 4, α(K)=2.71×10^-5 4, α(L)=2.41E-6 4, α(M)=3.09E-7 5, α(N)=1.684E-8 24, α(N+)=0.000186 3
	13/2-	0.51 ps +16-10	2037	(E2)		0.000359	B(E2)(W.u.)=0.22 +5-7, α=0.000359 6, α(K)=2.47E-5 4, α(L)=2.20E-6 3, α(M)=2.81E-7 4, α(N)=1.531E-8 22, α(N+)=0.000332 5
E(level) (keV)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	Multipolarity	Mixing Ratio	Conversion Coefficient	Additional Data
3484.5	(3/2-)	30 fs 10	3325	(E2)		0.000931	B(E2)(W.u.)=4.6 16, α=0.000931 14, α(K)=1.087E-5 16, α(L)=9.66E-7 14, α(M)=1.236E-7 18, α(N)=6.74E-9 10, α(N+)=0.000919 13
3567.97	17/2-	69 fs 21	819.09 5	M1+E2	-0.16 9	1.38×10^-4	B(E2)(W.u.)=60 +70-60, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.57 18, α=1.38E-4 3, α(K)=0.000125 3, α(L)=1.120E-5 24, α(M)=1.43E-6 3, α(N)=7.79E-8 17, α(N+)=7.79E-8 17
3827.1	7/2-	17 fs 9	2383	(E2)		0.000521	B(E2)(W.u.)=43 23, α=0.000521 8, α(K)=1.87E-5 3, α(L)=1.665E-6 24, α(M)=2.13E-7 3, α(N)=1.161E-8 17, α(N+)=0.000500 7
3993.94	15/2-	0.10 ps +8-5	267	(M1(+E2))	0.015 LE	0.001620	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.12 +12-5, α=0.001620 23, α(K)=0.001466 21, α(L)=0.0001327 19, α(M)=1.697×10^-5 24, α(N)=9.14E-7 13, α(N+)=9.14E-7 13
	15/2-	0.10 ps +8-5	706.21 5	(M1(+E2))		0.00024	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.6 +3-5, α=0.00024 6, α(K)=0.00022 6, α(L)=2.0×10^-5 5, α(M)=2.5E-6 7, α(N)=1.4E-7 4, α(N+)=1.4E-7 4
	15/2-	0.10 ps +8-5	2550	(E2)		0.000599	B(E2)(W.u.)=0.6 +3-5, α=0.000599 9, α(K)=1.667E-5 24, α(L)=1.484E-6 21, α(M)=1.90E-7 3, α(N)=1.034E-8 15, α(N+)=0.000580 9
4494.11	19/2-	0.111 ps 28	926.12 6	(M1+E2)	-0.05 4	1.07×10^-4	B(E2)(W.u.)=1.70 +272-17, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.23 6, α=1.07E-4 2, α(K)=9.69E-5 14, α(L)=8.66E-6 13, α(M)=1.108E-6 16, α(N)=6.03E-8 9, α(N+)=6.03E-8 9
4494.11	19/2-	0.111 ps 28	1745	(E2)		0.000229	B(E2)(W.u.)=2.8 8, α=0.000229 4, α(K)=3.29E-5 5, α(L)=2.94E-6 5, α(M)=3.76E-7 6, α(N)=2.04E-8 3, α(N+)=0.000193 3
4672.90	17/2-	0.12 ps 6	678.95 8	(M1(+E2))	0.021 LE	0.000200	BM1=0.39 20, α=0.000200 3, α(K)=0.000182 3, α(L)=1.629×10^-5 23, α(M)=2.08E-6 3, α(N)=1.132E-7 16, α(N+)=1.132E-7 16
4672.90	17/2-	0.12 ps 6	1385	(E2)		1.08×10^-4	B(E2)(W.u.)=20 11, α=1.08E-4, α(K)=5.25E-5 8, α(L)=4.68E-6 7, α(M)=5.99E-7 9, α(N)=3.25E-8 5, α(N+)=5.03E-5 7
5197.44	21/2-	49 fs 35	703.32 5	(M1(+E2))		0.00022	B(M1)(W.u.)=0.6 5, α=0.00022 9, α(K)=0.00020 8, α(L)=0.000018, α(M)=2.25×10^-6 10, α(N)=1.22E-7 5, α(N+)=1.22E-7 5
5197.44	21/2-	49 fs 35	1629.83 40	(E2)		0.000183	B(E2)(W.u.)=5.×10¹ 4, α=0.000183 3, α(K)=3.76E-5 6, α(L)=3.36E-6 5, α(M)=4.29E-7 6, α(N)=2.33E-8 4, α(N+)=0.0001416 20
6088.60	23/2-	35 fs 21	891.13 20	(M1+E2)	-0.09 8	1.15×10^-4	B(E2)(W.u.)=20.1 +375-20, B(M1)(W.u.)=0.8 5, α=1.15E-4 2, α(K)=0.0001048 17, α(L)=9.37E-6 16, α(M)=1.199E-6 20, α(N)=6.52E-8 11, α(N+)=6.52E-8 11
6088.60	23/2-	35 fs 21	1595	(E2)		0.0001700	B(E2)(W.u.)=19 12, α=0.0001700 24, α(K)=3.93E-5 6, α(L)=3.50E-6 5, α(M)=4.48E-7 7, α(N)=2.44E-8 4, α(N+)=0.0001266 18
8005.1	27/2-	0.49 ps 11	1916.45 20	(E2(+M3))	-0.0 3	3.03×10^-4	B(E2)(W.u.)=4.4 10, α=3.03E-4 15, α(K)=2.8E-5 4, α(L)=2.5E-6 4, α(M)=3.1E-7 4, α(N)=1.71E-8 23, α(N+)=0.000273 18

Levels: Resonance parameters: see 2006MuZX

Levels: See (d,p) for possible states not confirmed by other work

Gammas: See (n,γ), (γ,γ’), (n,n’γ), and (p,p’γ) for unplaced gammas or gammas whose placement was considered uncertain. See also (³He,pγ) for additional gammas whose placement was considered uncertain

Q-value: Note: Current evaluation has used the following Q record -2930.34 308880.2929 10462.2 7 -8948.7 8 2003Au03

Q(β-)=-2930.60 keV 15	S(n)= 8880.72 keV 15	S(p)= 10464.9 keV 7	Q(α)= -8952.5 keV 5
Reference: 2012WA38

References:
A	⁴⁷Sc β^- decay	B	⁴⁷V β⁺ decay
C	¹⁰B(⁴⁰Ca,3PG), ³⁶S(¹⁴C,3nγ),	D	⁴⁴Ca(α,nγ),⁴⁷Ti(p,p’),(p,p’γ),
E	⁴⁵Sc(³He,p),(³He,pγ)	F	⁴⁵Sc(α,NPG),(α,d)
G	⁴⁶Ti(n,γ),(pol n,γ) E=THERMAL	H	⁴⁶Ti(d,pγ)
I	⁴⁶Ti(d,p)	J	⁴⁶Ti(d,p),(pol d,p)
K	⁴⁷Ti(γ,γ),(γ,γ’)	L	I(γ+ce)(n,n’),(n,n’γ)
M	Coulomb Excitation	N	⁴⁸Ti(p,d)
O	⁴⁸Ti(d,t)	P	⁴⁸Ti(³He,α)
Q	⁴⁸Ti(α,2P3NG),(¹⁶O,12C2P3NG)	R	⁵⁰V(p,α)
S	muonic atom

E(level)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	Comments
0.0	5/2-	STABLE	μ=-0.78848 1 (2005St24,1965Dr03,1953Je16), Q=+0.30 2 (2005St24,1990Ay01), T=3/2 E(level): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). yrast band.
159.371	7/2-	210 ps 6	μ=-1.9 6 (2005St24,1977Bu10), T=3/2 E(level): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). yrast band. J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
1252.09	9/2-	140 fs 13	E(level): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). yrast band.
1444.25	11/2-	0.90 ps 14	E(level): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). yrast band. From (¹⁴C,3nγ). J^π(level): From γ(θ) and RUL of deexciting γ. T_1/2(level): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). T_1/2 by DSAM.
1549.65	3/2-	1.5 ps 4	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
1793.80	1/2-	1.7 ps +17-6	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
1825.0	3/2+,5/2+	2.1 ps +19-7	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator).
2163.2	3/2-	25.1 fs 43	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
2166.7	5/2	19 fs 5	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
2259.5	5/2+	0.54 ps 12	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
2297.1	5/2-,7/2-	< 10 fs	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator).
2364.9	1/2+	> 1.53 ps	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
2406.2	(9/2-)	23 fs 7	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). Connected by a J\|)J or J\|)J-2, presumably stretched E2; 3727 decays weakly to yrast 9/2-.
2416.3	1/2- TO 7/2-	1.0 ps +6-3	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator).
2525.8	3/2-,5/2-	94 fs 19	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
2548.2	3/2-	6.2 fs 7	XREF: γ(2554). E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
2572.9	1/2+	0.53 ps +22-14	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
2599.6	3/2-,5/2,7/2	1.3 ps +5-3	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). L(d,p)=3 for multiplet.
2619.4	7/2-	29 fs 8	E(level): Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p). L(d,p)=3 for multiplet.
2668.0	9/2,13/2	21 fs 16	E(level): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator).
2682.30	11/2(-)	> 2.10 ps	E(level): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band.
2748.87	15/2-	1.11 ps 21	E(level): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). yrast band. From (¹⁴C,3nγ). J^π(level): From γ(θ) and RUL of deexciting γ. T_1/2(level): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). T_1/2 by DSAM.
2757.6	7/2- TO 13/2-	17 fs 11	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator).
2785.1	3/2 TO 9/2		E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator).
2793.2	1/2-		J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
E(level)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	Comments
2800.2		0.35 ps +26-16	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). L(³He,α)=3 for multiplet. L(p,d)=3 for multiplet.
2809.5	5/2-,7/2,9/2-	49 fs 23	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): L(³He,α)=3 for multiplet. L(p,d)=3 for multiplet.
2828.5	1/2- TO 7/2	0.16 ps 5	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). L(d,p)=3 for multiplet. L(³He,α)=3 for multiplet. L(p,d)=3 for multiplet.
2838.9	3/2- TO 9/2-	< 33 fs	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). L(d,p)=3 for multiplet.
2846.3	5/2- TO 11/2-	< 19 fs	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). L(d,p)=3 for multiplet.
3033.1	5/2-,7/2	0.41 ps 9	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
3051.5	5/2- TO 11/2-	0.43 ps +12-9	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
3176.0	3/2-,5/2+	0.23 ps +10-7	Possible doublet. E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator).
3225.8	7/2-	7 fs +7-6	T=3/2 Antianalog state. E(level): Antianalog state. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): L(³He,p)=0 or 0⁺2.
3251.6	7/2-	29 fs 9	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
3277.7	3/2-	42 fs 22	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
3287.73	13/2-	0.51 ps +16-10	E(level): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. d or d,E2 γ to J_i-1 state; high selection of yrast states in fusion-evaporation and restrictions on γ(θ) (Cf. 1985Wa09). π=- from d,E2 γ to J_i-2,π=-.
3368.9	7/2-,9/2,11/2-	0.19 ps 6	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
3400.5	7/2- TO 13/2	1.4 ps +10-4	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator).
3434.6	1/2- TO 7/2	65 fs 22	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator).
3484.5	(3/2-)	30 fs 10	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
3515.5	1/2+	40 fs 12	Possibly a doublet since d,E2 γ? to 5/2- is not consistent with L(d,p)=0. E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator).
3544.8	3/2-,5/2+	< 35 fs	Possible doublet. E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): L(d,p)=1 for multiplet.
3553.6	3/2- TO 11/2-	35 fs +38-33	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): L(d,p)=1 for multiplet.
3567.97	17/2-	69 fs 21	E(level): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). yrast band. From (¹⁴C,3nγ). J^π(level): From γ(θ) and RUL of deexciting γ. T_1/2(level): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). T_1/2 by DSAM.
3582.7	(3/2-)	< 15 fs	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
3622.5	5/2- TO 13/2-	20 fs 19	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
3676.1	3/2-	< 40 fs	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
3701.8	7/2,9/2,11/2,13/2-	24 fs +24-22	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator).
3724			E(level): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p).
E(level)	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	Comments
3727.1	(13/2-)		J^π(level): Connected by a J\|)J or J\|)J-2, presumably stretched E2; 3727 decays weakly to yrast 9/2-.
3780.0	3/2(-) TO 9/2-	44 fs 19	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator).
3827.1	7/2-	17 fs 9	E(level): From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. Held fixed in least-squares adjustment.
3923	3/2-		J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
3993.94	15/2-	0.10 ps +8-5	E(level): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. J^π(level): See (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ) for proposed assignment (not adopted by evaluator). NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. d or d,E2 γ to J_i-1 state; high selection of yrast states in fusion-evaporation and restrictions on γ(θ) (Cf. 1985Wa09). π=- from d,E2 γ to J_i-2,π=-. T_1/2(level): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). T_1/2 by DSAM.
4243			J^π(level): L(³He,p)=0⁺2, 4252, state may correspond to this or the following state.
4264			J^π(level): L(³He,p)=0⁺2, 4252, state may correspond to this or the following state.
4494.11	19/2-	0.111 ps 28	E(level): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). yrast band. T_1/2(level): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). T_1/2 by DSAM.
4637	1/2-		E(level): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p). J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
4672.90	17/2-	0.12 ps 6	E(level): NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. J^π(level): NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. d or d,E2 γ to J_i-1 state; high selection of yrast states in fusion-evaporation and restrictions on γ(θ) (Cf. 1985Wa09). π=- from d,E2 γ to J_i-2,π=-. T_1/2(level): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). T_1/2 by DSAM.
4708	-		J^π(level): L(³He,p)=0 or 0⁺2.
5197.44	21/2-	49 fs 35	E(level): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). yrast band. T_1/2(level): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). T_1/2 by DSAM.
5355	1/2-		E(level): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p). J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
5372			E(level): From (³He,p) and (³He,pγ).
5580	1/2-		E(level): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p). J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
5810	1/2-		E(level): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p). J^π(level): From J-dependence of vector analyzing power and angular momentum transfer in (d,p) and (pol d,p).
6088.60	23/2-	35 fs 21	E(level): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). yrast band. T_1/2(level): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). T_1/2 by DSAM.
6366.4	(21/2-)	< 28 fs	E(level): NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. J^π(level): NEGATIVE-PARITY SIDE band. T_1/2(level): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). T_1/2 by DSAM.
6530	-		E(level): From (³He,p) and (³He,pγ). J^π(level): L(³He,p)=0 or 0⁺2.
7349.0	7/2-		T=5/2 Analog of ⁴⁷Sc g.s., 7/2-. E(level): From (³He,p) and (³He,pγ). J^π(level): L(³He,p)=0 or 0⁺2.
7480.6	-		E(level): From (³He,p) and (³He,pγ). J^π(level): L(³He,p)=0 or 0⁺2.
8005.1	27/2-	0.49 ps 11	E(level): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). yrast band. T_1/2(level): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). T_1/2 by DSAM.
8.16E+3	(3/2)+		T=5/2 E(level): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively. J^π(level): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively.
8.79E+3	1/2+		T=5/2 E(level): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively. J^π(level): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively.

E(level)	E(gamma)	Comments
159.371	159.373	E(γ): weighted av of 159.381 15 from β^- decay, 159.369 20 from from (¹²C,3nγ) and 159.27 4 from (n,γ). Arithmetic mean of 159.370 12 (NRM) and 159.375 12 (RT) adopted. I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ)
1252.09	1092.71	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s. The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. I(γ): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ)
1252.09	1252.0	E(γ): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. I(γ): The g.s. transition is observed only in a (p,p’γ) and (³He,αγ) study, a (p,p’γ) and (α,nγ), a (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ), and a Coulomb excitation study and the branching ratios derived from Coulomb excitation are discrepant with the others. There are several possible causes for these disagreements: 1. The 1253γ intensity may be too low to observe in the other measurements. 2. The geometry in the (p,p’γ) studies may be such that the observed transition is a sum of the 1093 and 159 γ’s. 3. The assumption of no contamination from the 1444 to 160 transition in Coulomb excitation may not be valid. 4. There may be contamination from deexcitation of the 1250 (3/2-,1/2-), state which would be dependent both on the reaction mechanism and on the incident energy. M(γ): From γ(θ) in (³He,αγ) and comparison to RUL
1444.25	192.150	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). Iγ(192γ)/Iγ(1285γ)=0.129 3 and Iγ(703γ)/Iγ(1630γ)=3.1 9 in (¹⁴C,3nγ) discrepant M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ)
1444.25	1284.86	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). Iγ(192γ)/Iγ(1285γ)=0.129 3 and Iγ(703γ)/Iγ(1630γ)=3.1 9 in (¹⁴C,3nγ) discrepant M(γ): J\|)J or J\|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). Ne M2 from comparison to RUL
1549.65	1390.33	E(γ): from (n,γ),(pol n,γ) E=thermal I(γ): From β⁺ decay
1549.65	1549.9	E(γ): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β⁺ decay M(γ): From γ(θ) in (³He,αγ) and comparison to RUL
1793.80	244.27	E(γ): From (n,γ) I(γ): From β⁺ decay
1793.80	1793.9	E(γ): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β⁺ decay M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
1825.0	1825	M(γ): D+Q from γ(θ) in (³He,αγ). Δπ=yes from level scheme
2163.2	2003.1	E(γ): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β⁺ decay M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
2163.2	2163.0	E(γ): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β⁺ decay M(γ): d(+Q) from γ(θ) in (³He,αγ). Δπ=no from level scheme
2166.7	2007.3	E(γ): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β⁺ decay
2259.5	2101	E(γ): From (³He,p) and (³He,pγ) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=yes from level scheme
2259.5	2259.7	E(γ): From (³He,p) and (³He,pγ) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=yes from level scheme
2297.1	2297	M(γ): d,E2 from σ(96\|’)/σ(126\|’) in (γ,γ’) and comparison to RUL. Δπ=no from level scheme
2406.2	962	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively I(γ): Iγ(962γ):Iγ(1154γ):Iγ(2247γ)=0.3:3:1 from (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) discrepant M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1154	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively I(γ): Iγ(962γ):Iγ(1154γ):Iγ(2247γ)=0.3:3:1 from (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) discrepant M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	2247	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively I(γ): Iγ(962γ):Iγ(1154γ):Iγ(2247γ)=0.3:3:1 from (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) discrepant M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	2406	M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
2416.3	591	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	866	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	2416	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2525.8	2366.3	E(γ): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p). E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively I(γ): From β⁺ decay M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2525.8	2525.6	E(γ): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p). E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively I(γ): From β⁺ decay M(γ): From comparison to RUL
E(level)	E(gamma)	Comments
2548.2	2548.7	E(γ): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β⁺ decay M(γ): d(+Q) from σ(96\|’)/σ(126\|’) in (γ,γ’). Δπ=no from level scheme
2572.9	748	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2572.9	1023	E(γ): From (³He,p) and (³He,pγ) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Δπ=yes from level scheme
2599.6	775	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	2441	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	2600	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2619.4	452	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1367	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	2460	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	2619	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2682.30	276	E(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ)
	1238	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): J\|)J or J\|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ)
	1430.22	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ)
2748.87	1304.61	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): J\|)J or J\|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). Ne M2 from comparison to RUL
2757.6	1314	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2757.6	1506	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2793.2	1243.5	E(γ): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β⁺ decay
2793.2	2793.3	E(γ): From β⁺ decay. From (d,p) I(γ): From β⁺ decay
2800.2	2800	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2809.5	1558	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2809.5	2810	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2828.5	412	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1003	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	2828	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2838.9	2680	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2838.9	2839	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
E(level)	E(gamma)	Comments
2846.3	1594	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2846.3	2687	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
2855	2855	E(γ): From (n,γ)
3033.1	773	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1781	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	2874	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	3033	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3051.5	267	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3051.5	1800	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3176.0	760	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	811	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1013	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1351	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	3017	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	3176	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3251.6	955	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1808	M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
	3093	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	3252	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3277.7	1113	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3277.7	1728	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3287.73	605.47	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): d(+Q) from γ(θ) in (α,nγ). Δπ=no from level scheme. Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ)
	1843.36	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). d(+Q) from γ(θ) in (¹⁴C,3nγ). Δπ=no from level scheme
	2037	E(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
3368.9	1925	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3368.9	3210	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
E(level)	E(gamma)	Comments
3400.5	348	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	718	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1956	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3434.6	1610	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3434.6	3435	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3484.5	3325	M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
3515.5	1151	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1691	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	3516	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. Discrepant with ΔJπ=2,yes from level scheme. From comparison to RUL
3544.8	1180	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	1720	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	3386	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	3545	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3553.6	3395	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3567.97	819.09	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). From γ(θ) in (¹⁴C,3nγ). δ given for adopted J’s
3582.7	3424	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3622.5	2370	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3676.1	3676	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3701.8	1034	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3701.8	2450	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3727.1	1321	E(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): J\|)J or J\|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ)
3727.1	2475	E(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ)
3780.0	3621	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3780.0	3780	E(γ): E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively M(γ): From comparison to RUL
3827.1	2383	M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
E(level)	E(gamma)	Comments
3923	3925	E(γ): From (n,γ). Held fixed in least-squares adjustment I(γ): From (n,γ) M(γ): from γγ(θ) in (n,γ)
3993.94	267	E(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): d from comparison to RUL. Δπ=no from level scheme
	706.21	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). d(+Q) from γ(θ) in (¹⁴C,3nγ). Δπ=no from level scheme
	2550	E(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
4494.11	926.12	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): D+Q from γ(θ) in (¹²C,3nγ). Δπ=no from level scheme. Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ)
4494.11	1745	E(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): J\|)J or J\|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). Ne M2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
4672.90	678.95	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). d(+Q) from γ(θ) in (¹⁴C,3nγ). Δπ=no from level scheme
	1385	E(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): J\|)J or J\|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). Ne M2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
	1924	E(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
5197.44	703.32	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). Iγ(192γ)/Iγ(1285γ)=0.129 3 and Iγ(703γ)/Iγ(1630γ)=3.1 9 in (¹⁴C,3nγ) discrepant M(γ): d(+Q) from γ(θ) in (¹⁴C,3nγ). Δπ=yes from level scheme. Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). Stretched dipole from γ(θ) in (¹⁴C,3nγ)
5197.44	1629.83	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). Iγ(192γ)/Iγ(1285γ)=0.129 3 and Iγ(703γ)/Iγ(1630γ)=3.1 9 in (¹⁴C,3nγ) discrepant M(γ): J\|)J or J\|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). Ne M2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
5355	5365	E(γ): From (n,γ)
5372	2807	E(γ): From (³He,pγ). ≈50% of the decay from the 7346-keV state has not been observed
5746	3145	E(γ): From (n,γ)
	3189	E(γ): From (n,γ)
	3335	E(γ): Multiply placed. From (n,γ)
	3335	E(γ): Multiply placed. From (n,γ)
6088.60	891.13	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ).. From (p,p’γ). Held fixed in least-squares fit to Eγ’s I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): D+Q from γ(θ) in (¹⁴C,3nγ). Δπ=yes from level scheme. Stretched dipole from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). Stretched dipole from γ(θ) in (¹⁴C,3nγ)
6088.60	1595	E(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): d,E2 from comparison to RUL. ΔJπ=2,no from level scheme
6366.4	1693.2	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): J\|)J or J\|)J-2 from angular anisotropy in (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). Ne M2 from comparison to RUL
	1873	E(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
	2798	E(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ). E(level) is weighted average from (p,d) and (³He,α). Analog states of ⁴⁷Sc 767, (3/2)+, and 1391, 1/2⁺, respectively I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ) M(γ): From comparison to RUL
7349.0	4123	E(γ): From (³He,pγ). ≈50% of the decay from the 7346-keV state has not been observed I(γ): From (³He,pγ). ≈50% of the decay from the 7346-keV state has not been observed
7349.0	7189	E(γ): From (³He,pγ). ≈50% of the decay from the 7346-keV state has not been observed I(γ): From (³He,pγ). ≈50% of the decay from the 7346-keV state has not been observed
7480.6	7480	E(γ): From (³He,pγ). ≈50% of the decay from the 7346-keV state has not been observed
E(level)	E(gamma)	Comments
8005.1	1916.45	E(γ): From (¹⁴C,3nγ). I(γ): From (⁴⁰Ca,3pγ)

E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
0.0	A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P R	5/2-	STABLE
159.371 12	A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P R	7/2-	210 ps 6	159.373 12	100	M1+E2	0.0	5/2-
1250.7 10	G I	(1/2-,3/2-)
1252.09 4	C D E F L M N O Q R	9/2-	140 fs 13	1092.71 5 1252.0?	100 2 6 2	M1+E2 E2	159.371 0.0	7/2- 5/2-
1444.25 4	C E F I J K L M P	11/2-	0.90 ps 14	192.150 10 1284.86 4	6.2 100	M1+E2 E2	1252.09 159.371	9/2- 7/2-
1549.65 9	B D E F G H I J L N O P R	3/2-	1.5 ps 4	1390.33 10 1549.9 4	100.0 29 83.9 25	E2 M1+E2	159.371 0.0	7/2- 5/2-
1670 80	L R
1793.80 16	B D E F G I J O R	1/2-	1.7 ps +17-6	244.27 16 1793.9 4	49.1 23 100	M1+E2 (E2)	1549.65 0.0	3/2- 5/2-
1825.0 1	D F G I N O P R	3/2+,5/2+	2.1 ps +19-7	1825	100	(E1+M2)	0.0	5/2-
2163.2 2	B D E I J K N O P	3/2-	25.1 fs 43	2003.1 10 2163.0 5	5.4 6 100.0 23	(E2) (M1(+E2))	159.371 0.0	7/2- 5/2-
2166.7 2	B D F R	5/2	19 fs 5	2007.3 10	100	D(+Q)	159.371	7/2-
2259.5 2	D I J N O R	5/2+	0.54 ps 12	2101 2259.7	22 4 100 4	(E1(+M2)) (E1(+M2))	159.371 0.0	7/2- 5/2-
2297.1 2	D F I K L R	5/2-,7/2-	< 10 fs	2137 2297	28 4 100 4	(M1+E2) (M1,E2)	159.371 0.0	7/2- 5/2-
2344?	I
2364.9 2	D I N O P R	1/2+	> 1.53 ps	540.0	100		1825.0	3/2+,5/2+
2406.2 2	D G I L	(9/2-)	23 fs 7	962 1154 2247 2406?	14 5 30 5 100 3 14 5	D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 (E2)	1444.25 1252.09 159.371 0.0	11/2- 9/2- 7/2- 5/2-
2416.3 2	D F G I L R	1/2- TO 7/2-	1.0 ps +6-3	591 866 2416	100 7 53 7 79 7	D,E2 D,E2 D,E2	1825.0 1549.65 0.0	3/2+,5/2+ 3/2- 5/2-
2499.4 19 ?	G	1/2(-),3/2,5/2+		2500 5 ?			0.0	5/2-
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
2520?	I O	1/2+
2525.8 2	B D I	3/2-,5/2-	94 fs 19	2366.3 5 2525.6 5	96 7 100 4	D,E2 D,E2	159.371 0.0	7/2- 5/2-
2548.2 2	D F G I J K O R	3/2-	6.2 fs 7	2548.7 5	100	(M1(+E2))	0.0	5/2-
2572.9 2	D I N	1/2+	0.53 ps +22-14	748 1023	37 6 100 6	D,E2 (E1(+M2))	1825.0 1549.65	3/2+,5/2+ 3/2-
2599.6 2	D G I N O	3/2-,5/2,7/2	1.3 ps +5-3	775 2441 2600	27 6 81 6 100 6	D,E2 D,E2 D,E2	1825.0 159.371 0.0	3/2+,5/2+ 7/2- 5/2-
2619.4 2	D E F G I J L N O P R	7/2-	29 fs 8	452 1367 2460 2619	2.7 14 10 3 100 4 25 4	D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 D,E2	2166.7 1252.09 159.371 0.0	5/2 9/2- 7/2- 5/2-
2668.0 2	C D F I R	9/2,13/2	21 fs 16	1224	100	D+Q	1444.25	11/2-
2682.30 5	C D F Q R	11/2(-)	> 2.10 ps	276 1238 2 1430.22 4	1.4 43 100	D,Q D(+Q)	2406.2 1444.25 1252.09	(9/2-) 11/2- 9/2-
2695?	I
2748.87 6	C D F Q R	15/2-	1.11 ps 21	1304.61 4	100	E2	1444.25	11/2-
2757.6 2	D I R	7/2- TO 13/2-	17 fs 11	1314 1506	100 4 35 4	D,E2 D,E2	1444.25 1252.09	11/2- 9/2-
2785.1 5	D	3/2 TO 9/2		2785	100		0.0	5/2-
2793.2 5	B D G I J	1/2-		1243.5 5 2793.3 10	100 23 26 5		1549.65 0.0	3/2- 5/2-
2800.2 10	D N O P R		0.35 ps +26-16	2800	100	D,E2	0.0	5/2-
2809.5 4	D N O P R	5/2-,7/2,9/2-	49 fs 23	1558 2810	32 5 100 5	D,E2 D,E2	1252.09 0.0	9/2- 5/2-
2828.5 2	D I J N O P R	1/2- TO 7/2	0.16 ps 5	412 1003 2828	97 11 81 11 100 11	D D,E2 D,E2	2416.3 1825.0 0.0	1/2- TO 7/2- 3/2+,5/2+ 5/2-
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
2838.9 5	D F I J N	3/2- TO 9/2-	< 33 fs	2680 2839	100 5 20 5	D,E2 D,E2	159.371 0.0	7/2- 5/2-
2846.3 3	D F I J L R	5/2- TO 11/2-	< 19 fs	1594 2687	72 7 100 7	D,E2 D,E2	1252.09 159.371	9/2- 7/2-
2855 5 ?	F G L R	1/2(-),3/2,5/2+		2855 5 ?			0.0	5/2-
2868?	F I L
3033.1 2	D I L R	5/2-,7/2	0.41 ps 9	773 1781 2874 3033	28 5 25 5 100 7 23 5	D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 D,E2	2259.5 1252.09 159.371 0.0	5/2+ 9/2- 7/2- 5/2-
3051.5 2	D I L R	5/2- TO 11/2-	0.43 ps +12-9	267 1800 2893	15 6 100 9 98 9	D D,E2 D,E2	2785.1 1252.09 159.371	3/2 TO 9/2 9/2- 7/2-
3176.0 3	D G I O R	3/2-,5/2+	0.23 ps +10-7	760 811 1013 1351 3017 3176	42 12 46 12 38 12 62 12 100 15 96 19	D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 D,E2	2416.3 2364.9 2163.2 1825.0 159.371 0.0	1/2- TO 7/2- 1/2+ 3/2- 3/2+,5/2+ 7/2- 5/2-
3211 8	E I N O P R	5/2-,7/2-
3225.8 3	D F I	7/2-	7 fs +7-6	1974 3067 3226	100 6 46 6 13 5		1252.09 159.371 0.0	9/2- 7/2- 5/2-
3251.6 3	D E F I	7/2-	29 fs 9	955 1808 3093 3252	27 7 64 7 100 9 31 7	D,E2 (E2) D,E2 D,E2	2297.1 1444.25 159.371 0.0	5/2-,7/2- 11/2- 7/2- 5/2-
3277.7 3	D I J R	3/2-	42 fs 22	1113 1728	100 10 72 10	D,E2 D,E2	2166.7 1549.65	5/2 3/2-
3287.73 6	C D F Q R	13/2-	0.51 ps +16-10	605.47 5 1843.36 6 2037	44 100 11	(M1(+E2)) (M1(+E2)) (E2)	2682.30 1444.25 1252.09	11/2(-) 11/2- 9/2-
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
3368.9 4	D I R	7/2-,9/2,11/2-	0.19 ps 6	1925 3210	64 10 100 10	D,E2 D,E2	1444.25 159.371	11/2- 7/2-
3400.5 2	D I R	7/2- TO 13/2	1.4 ps +10-4	348 718 1956	86 14 52 10 100 12	D D,E2 D,E2	3051.5 2682.30 1444.25	5/2- TO 11/2- 11/2(-) 11/2-
3434.6 4	D I	1/2- TO 7/2	65 fs 22	1610 3435	79 9 100 9	D,E2 D,E2	1825.0 0.0	3/2+,5/2+ 5/2-
3484.5 5	D F I N O R	(3/2-)	30 fs 10	3325	100	(E2)	159.371	7/2-
3515.5 5	D F I O R	1/2+	40 fs 12	1151 1691 3516?	80 13 100 13 37 11	D,E2 D,E2 D,E2	2364.9 1825.0 0.0	1/2+ 3/2+,5/2+ 5/2-
3544.8 4	D G I J N	3/2-,5/2+	< 35 fs	1180 1720 3386 3545	19 6 48 8 100 10 42 8	D,E2 D,E2 D,E2 D,E2	2364.9 1825.0 159.371 0.0	1/2+ 3/2+,5/2+ 7/2- 5/2-
3553.6 10	D G I J N P	3/2- TO 11/2-	35 fs +38-33	3395	100	D,E2	159.371	7/2-
3567.97 8	C D F P	17/2-	69 fs 21	819.09 5	100	M1+E2	2748.87	15/2-
3582.7 4	D F I	(3/2-)	< 15 fs	3424	100	D,E2	159.371	7/2-
3622.5 6	D F I	5/2- TO 13/2-	20 fs 19	2370	100	D,E2	1252.09	9/2-
3654	F I O
3676.1 9	D F G I J	3/2-	< 40 fs	3676	100	D,E2	0.0	5/2-
3701.8 5	D F I	7/2,9/2,11/2,13/2-	24 fs +24-22	1034 2450	92 19 100 19	D D,E2	2668.0 1252.09	9/2,13/2 9/2-
3724 16	F I
3727.1 6	C	(13/2-)		1321 2475	100 7.5	D,Q	2406.2 1252.09	(9/2-) 9/2-
3780.0 10	D I	3/2(-) TO 9/2-	44 fs 19	3621 3780	56 12 100 12	D,(E2) D,E2	159.371 0.0	7/2- 5/2-
3827.1 5	D E I	7/2-	17 fs 9	2383	100	(E2)	1444.25	11/2-
3839 11	F I
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
3889	I
3923 4	E F G I J K O	3/2-		3925 5	100	D,Q	0.0	5/2-
3961 16	F I
3993.94 8	C D F Q	15/2-	0.10 ps +8-5	267 706.21 5 2550	1.2 100 12	(M1(+E2)) (M1(+E2)) (E2)	3727.1 3287.73 1444.25	(13/2-) 13/2- 11/2-
4040 16	I
4095 16	I	1/2-,3/2-
4112 16	I N
4132 16 ?	I N
4164	I N
4180	I
4217 16	I
4243 16	E I
4264 16	E I
4277	I
4281	I
4303 16	I
4336 16	I	3/2+,5/2+
4359 16	I
4380 16	I	3/2+,5/2+
4466 16	I
4492 16	I
4494.11 10	C D F	19/2-	0.111 ps 28	926.12 6 1745	100 10	(M1+E2) (E2)	3567.97 2748.87	17/2- 15/2-
4518 16	I
4541 16	I
4553 16	I
4588 16	I	7/2+,9/2+
4605 16	I
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
4637 16	I J	1/2-
4670 16	I
4672.90 11	C	17/2-	0.12 ps 6	678.95 8 1385 1924	100 33 17	(M1(+E2)) (E2) D,E2	3993.94 3287.73 2748.87	15/2- 13/2- 15/2-
4686 16	I	3/2+,5/2+
4708 11	E F	-
4743 16	I
4758 11	E F
4793 16	I
4811 16	I
4829 16	I
4847 16	I
4876 16	I
4898 16	I
4924 16	I	1/2-,3/2-
4957 16	I	1/2+
4982 16	I	3/2+,5/2+
5013 16	I	1/2-,3/2-
5043 16	I
5070 16	I
5102 16	I
5125 16	I
5148 16	I
5195 16	I
5197.44 11	C F	21/2-	49 fs 35	703.32 5 1629.83 40	86 100	(M1(+E2)) (E2)	4494.11 3567.97	19/2- 17/2-
5265 16	I	1/2+
5301 16	I
5313 16	I	1/2-,3/2-
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
5355 16	G I J	1/2-		5365 10 ?			0.0	5/2-
5372 15	E			2807?			2572.9	1/2+
5407 16	I	1/2+
5433 16	I	1/2-,3/2-
5451	I
5478 16	I
5540 16	I	1/2-,3/2-
5580 16	I J	1/2-
5615 16	I	1/2-,3/2-
5635 16	I
5670 16	I
5702 16	I
5746 4 ?	G			3145 5 ? 3189 5 ? 3335 5 ? 3335 5 ?			2599.6 2548.2 2416.3 2406.2	3/2-,5/2,7/2 3/2- 1/2- TO 7/2- (9/2-)
5755 16 ?	I
5774 16	I
5810 16	I J	1/2-
5836 16	I
5872 16	I
5937 16	I
5976 16	I	1/2+
6013	I
6039	I	3/2+,5/2+
6067	I	(1/2-,3/2-)
6088.60 23	C	23/2-	35 fs 21	891.13 20 1595	100 14	(M1+E2) (E2)	5197.44 4494.11	21/2- 19/2-
6095	I
6129	I
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
6158	I	1/2+
6169	I	1/2+
6195	I
6209	I
6234	I
6265	I
6304	I
6333	I	1/2-,3/2-
6364	I
6366.4 6	C	(21/2-)	< 28 fs	1693.2 9 1873 2798	100 60 20	D,E2 D,E2 D,E2	4672.90 4494.11 3567.97	17/2- 19/2- 17/2-
6387	I
6402	I
6430	I	1/2+
6449	I
6474	I
6494	I	1/2+
6514	I
6530 15	E I	-
6554	I
6565	I
6585	I
6607	I	(1/2+)
6624	I
6645	I
6662	I
6673	I
6692	I
6709	I
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
6727	I
6749	I
6771	I	(1/2+)
6787	I
6823	I
6838	I
6854	E I
6882	E I
6903	I
6917	I
6936	I
6957	I
6980	I
7002	I
7018	I
7038	I
7067	I
7076	I
7095	I
7123	I
7141	I
7166	I	3/2+,5/2+
7187	I	3/2+,5/2+
7205	I
7225	I
7349.0 7	E N P	7/2-		4123 7189	67 100		3225.8 159.371	7/2- 7/2-
7480.6 10	E	-		7480			0.0	5/2-
8005.1 3	C	27/2-	0.49 ps 11	1916.45 20	100	(E2(+M3))	6088.60	23/2-
8.16E+3 2	N P	(3/2)+
E(level) (keV)	XREF	J^π(level)	T_1/2(level)	E(γ) (keV)	I(γ)	M(γ)	Final Levels
8.79E+3 2	N P	1/2+