NSR Query Results

Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of May 20, 2024.

Search: Author = S.Turkat

Found 9 matches.

Back to query form

2023DE27      Eur.Phys.J. A 59, 198 (2023)

J.Deary, M.Scheck, R.Schwengner, D.O'Donnell, D.Bemmerer, R.Beyer, Th.Hensel, A.R.Junghans, T.Kogler, S.E.Muller, K.Romer, K.Schmidt, S.Turkat, S.Urlass, A.Wagner, M.Bowry, P.Adsley, O.Agar, R.Chapman, F.C.L.Crespi, D.T.Doherty, U.Friman-Gayer, R.-D.Herzberg, J.Isaak, R.V.F.Janssens, T.Kroll, B.Loher, B.S.Nara Singh, P.von Neumann-Cosel, L.Pellegri, E.E.Peters, G.Rainovski, D.Savran, J.F.Smith, M.Spieker, P.G.Thirolf, S.Triambak, W.Tornow, M.Venhart, M.Wiedeking, O.Wieland, S.W.Yates, A.Zilges

Photo-response of the N = Z nucleus 24Mg

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 24Mg(γ, γ'), E<13 MeV; measured reaction products, Eγ, Iγ; deduced energy-integrated scattering σ, B(M1), B(E1). Comparison with available data. The ELBE accelerator of the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf.

doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01111-7
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023SK02      Phys.Rev. C 107, L062801 (2023)

J.Skowronski, E.Masha, D.Piatti, M.Aliotta, H.Babu, D.Bemmerer, A.Boeltzig, R.Depalo, A.Caciolli, F.Cavanna, L.Csedreki, Z.Fulop, G.Imbriani, D.Rapagnani, S.Rummler, K.Schmidt, R.S.Sidhu, T.Szucs, S.Turkat, A.Yadav

Improved S factor of the 12C(p, γ)13N reaction at E=320-620 keV and the 422 keV resonance

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C(p, γ)13N, E=350-670 keV; measured Eγ, Iγ, γ(θ); deduced resonance energy, resonance γ- and p-width, S-factor, astrophysical reaction rate (T=0.01-10 GK). R-matrix analysis. Relevance to HCNO nucleosynthesis.Comparison to other experimental data. Gammas detected by HPGe cluster detector. Molecular H2+ beam from 5MV Pelletron accelerator of Felsenkeller Laboratory

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.107.L062801
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023TU02      At.Data Nucl.Data Tables 152, 101584 (2023)

S.Turkat, X.Mougeot, B.Singh, K.Zuber

Systematics of log ft values for β- and EC/β+ transitions

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE A=1-254; analyzed available data; calculated log ft with the BetaShape code; deduced systematics for β transitions.

doi: 10.1016/j.adt.2023.101584
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022SC03      Phys.Rev. C 105, 024303 (2022)

R.Schwengner, R.Massarczyk, K.Schmidt, K.Zuber, R.Beyer, D.Bemmerer, S.Hammer, A.Hartmann, T.Hensel, H.F.Hoffmann, A.R.Junghans, T.Kogler, S.E.Muller, M.Pichotta, S.Turkat, J.A.B.Turko, S.Urlass, A.Wagner

Photoexcitation of 76Ge

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 76Ge(γ, γ'), E=7.8, 12.3 MeV bremsstrahlung beam; measured Eγ, Iγ, γ(θ); deduced photoabsorption σ. 76Ge; deduced levels, J, π, photon strength function. Statistical model calculations. HPGe detectors at the γELBE facility of the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR). Comparison with previous experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.024303
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetG0084. Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.

2022SH39      Phys.Rev. C 106, 044326 (2022)

T.Shizuma, S.Endo, A.Kimura, R.Massarczyk, R.Schwengner, R.Beyer, T.Hensel, H.Hoffmann, A.Junghans, K.Romer, S.Turkat, A.Wagner, N.Tsoneva

Low-lying dipole strength distribution in 204Pb

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 204Pb(γ, γ'), E<10.5 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ; deduced levels, J, branching ratios, average branching ratios, integrated scattering σ(E), photoabsorption σ(E), B(E1) strength distribution. Comparison to other experimental results and self-consistent energy density-functional theory+three-phonon quasiparticle-phonon model (EDF+QPM) calculations. Bremsstrahlung facility γELBE of the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.044326
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.

2021SC06      Phys.Rev. C 103, 024312 (2021)

R.Schwengner, R.Massarczyk, M.Scheck, W.Tornow, G.Battaglia, T.Beck, D.Bemmerer, N.Benouaret, R.Beyer, M.Butterling, F.Fiedler, S.W.Finch, C.Fransen, U.Friman-Gayer, A.Frotscher, R.Gonzalez, M.Grieger, A.Hartmann, T.Hensel, E.Hoemann, H.Hoffmann, R.V.F.Janssens, S.Johnson, M.D.Jones, A.R.Junghans, N.Kelly, J.Kleemann, Krishichayan, D.R.Little, F.Ludwig, S.E.Muller, D.O'Donnell, O.Papst, E.Pirovano, J.Sinclair, M.P.Takacs, S.Turkat, S.Urlass, A.Wagner, V.Werner, O.Wieland, J.Wilhelmy

Electric and magnetic dipole strength in 66Zn

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 66Zn(γ, γ'), (polarized γ, γ'), E=7.5, 13.4, MeV unpolarized bremsstrahlung from γELBE facility, and E=4.3, 4.4, 4.55, 4.7, 4.85, 5.0, 5.15, 5.3, 5.45, 5.6, 5.75, 5.9, 6.1, 6.3, 6.5, 6.7, 6.9, 7.1, 7.3, 7.5, 7.7, 7.9, 8.15, 8.4, 8.65, 8.9, 9.15, 9.4, 9.65, 9.9 MeV quasimonoenergetic and linearly polarized photon beams from HIγS facility; measured Eγ, Iγ, γγ(θ), γ(linear polarization) using four escape-suppressed HPGe detectors at γELBE and using two HPGe detectors at HIγS. 66Zn; deduced 128 J=1 levels up to 11.02 MeV excitation, pygmy dipole resonances (PDR), J, π, energy-integrated scattering σ, Γ02/Γ, photoabsorption σ, photon strength functions, B(M1). Comparison of measured photoabsorption cross sections with experimental values in 54Fe(γ, γ'), and with calculations using TALYS code as in the 2019 library, and from the three Lorentz functions (TLO). Comparison of B(M1) strengths with shell-model calculations using the jj44c Hamiltonian. Comparison of deduced photon strength functions with those from 64Ni(p, p'γ).

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.024312
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetL0269.

2021TU03      Phys.Rev. C 103, 045805 (2021)

S.Turkat, S.Hammer, E.Masha, S.Akhmadaliev, D.Bemmerer, M.Grieger, T.Hensel, J.Julin, M.Koppitz, F.Ludwig, C.Mockel, S.Reinicke, R.Schwengner, K.Stockel, T.Szucs, L.Wagner, K.Zuber

Measurement of the 2H(p, γ)3He S factor at 265-1094 keV

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(p, γ)3He, E=400-1650 keV from the 3-MV Tandetron accelerator at Dresden; measured Eγ, Iγ using two HPGe detectors, one surrounded by BGO escape-suppression shield; deduced astrophysical S factors at 14 different incident proton energies, corrected for the assumed ab initio angular distributions of γ rays. 2H(p, γ)3He, E=1-1650 keV; analyzed S-factor data from the present experiment together with previous measurements in other energy regions, and compared with theoretical predictions. Relevance to deuterium abundance in big bang nucleosynthesis.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.045805
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetO2556.

2020WI09      Phys.Rev. C 102, 044327 (2020)

J.Wilhelmy, M.Muscher, G.Rusev, R.Schwengner, R.Beyer, M.Bhike, P.Erbacher, F.Fiedler, U.Friman-Gayer, J.Glorius, R.Greifenhagen, S.Hammer, T.Hensel, J.Isaak, A.R.Junghans, Krishichayan, B.Loher, S.E.Muller, N.Pietralla, S.Reinicke, D.Savran, P.Scholz, K.Sonnabend, T.Szucs, M.Tamkas, W.Tornow, S.Turkat, A.Wagner, A.Zilges

Dipole response of 87Rb and its impact on the 86Rb (n, γ) 87Rb cross section

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 87Rb(γ, γ'), E=8.2, 13.2 MeV bremsstrahlung beam; measured Eγ, Iγ, γ(θ) using four HPGe detectors at the γ-ELBE facility in Dresden. 87Rb(polarized γ, γ'), E=5.10, 5.30, 5.50, 5.75, 6.00, 6.25, 6.50, 6.75, 7.00, 7.25, 7.50, 7.80, 8.10, 8.40, 8.70, 9.00, 9.30, 9.60 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, azimuthal asymmetry using four LaBr3:Ce scintillators and four HPGe detectors at the HIγS facility of TUNL; deduced energy-integrated σ(excitation energy), γ-ray sum spectra, photoabsorption σ(E), E1-photon strength functions (PSFs), nuclear level densities (NLDs), Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn (TRK) sum rule. Comparison with QRPA calculations for PSFs, and microscopic Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov calculations with Skyrme and Gogny forces for NLDs. 87Rb; deduced 256 discrete levels from 845 to 10005 keV, J, π, gΓ02/Γ, γ-ray branching ratios for selected levels, as listed in supplemental material. 86Rb(n, γ), kT=5-100 keV; deduced Maxwellian cross sections (MACSs) for different PSF and NLD inputs, and compared to data in KADoNiS database.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.044327
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 datasetL0266.

2019SZ03      Eur.Phys.J. A 55, 174 (2019)

T.Szucs, D.Bemmerer, D.Degering, A.Domula, M.Grieger, F.Ludwig, K.Schmidt, J.Steckling, S.Turkat, K.Zuber

Background in γ-ray detectors and carbon beam tests in the Felsenkeller shallow-underground accelerator laboratory

doi: 10.1140/epja/i2019-12865-4
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Back to query form