NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 29, 2024. Search: Author = M.Hadzimehmedovic Found 14 matches. 2021OS03 Phys.Rev. C 104, 034605 (2021) H.Osmanovic, M.Hadzimehmedovic, R.Omerovic, J.Stahov, V.Kashevarov, M.Ostrick, L.Tiator, A.Svarc Single-energy partial-wave analysis for pion photoproduction with fixed-t analyticity NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(polarized γ, π0p), (polarized γ, π+n), 1n(polarized γ, π-p), (polarized γ, π0n), W<2.2 GeV; analyzed experimental world collection of data from several laboratories; deduced helicity amplitudes, polarization observables, electric and magnetic isoscalar and isovector multipoles for different isospins using fixed-t analyticity constraining method for single-energy partial wave analysis (SE PWA) in pion photoproduction. Compiled experimental world data for π0p, π+n and π-p channels from experiments at A2MAMI, CLAS, CBELSA/TAPS
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.034605
2019OS04 Phys.Rev. C 100, 055203 (2019) H.Osmanovic, M.Hadzimehmedovic, R.Omerovic, J.Stahov, M.Gorchtein, V.Kashevarov, K.Nikonov, M.Ostrick, L.Tiator, A.Svarc Single-energy partial wave analysis for π0 photoproduction on the proton with fixed-t analyticity imposed NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(γ, π0p), (polarized γ, π0p), E(cm)=1.07-1.9 GeV; analyzed experimental differential σ(E) data from A2@MAMI, DAPHNE, MAMI, CBELSA/TAPS and GRAAL collaborations; deduced electric and magnetic multipoles up to l=3. Fixed-t single energy partial-wave analysis (SE PWA) of π0 photoproduction on the world collection of data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.055203
2018OS01 Phys.Rev. C 97, 015207 (2018) H.Osmanovic, M.Hadzimehmedovic, R.Omerovic, J.Stahov, V.Kashevarov, K.Nikonov, M.Ostrick, L.Tiator, A.Svarc Fixed-t analyticity as a constraint in single-energy partial-wave analyses of meson photoproduction reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(γ, pη), E=1487-1850 MeV; analyzed differential σ(E, θ) for polarization observables experimental data at MAMI and GRAAL facilities using analytical constraints from fixed-t dispersion relations in partial wave analysis of η photoproduction data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.015207
2018SV01 Phys.Rev. C 97, 054611 (2018) A.Svarc, Y.Wunderlich, H.Osmanovic, M.Hadzimehmedovic, R.Omerovic, J.Stahov, V.Kashevarov, K.Nikonov, M.Ostrick, L.Tiator, R.Workman Connection between angle-dependent phase ambiguities and the uniqueness of the partial-wave decomposition
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.054611
2018SV03 Phys.Rev. C 98, 045206 (2018) A.Svarc, H.Osmanovic, M.Hadzimehmedovic, R.Omerovic, J.Stahov, M.Gorchteyn, V.Kashevarov, K.Nikonov, M.Ostrick, L.Tiator Role of angle-dependent phase rotations of reaction amplitudes in η photoproduction on protons NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(γ, η), E(cm)=1.5-2.0 GeV; calculated E0+η and all η photoproduction multipoles using Kent State University, Bonn-Gatchina, Julich-Bonn, and Mainz EtaMAID models, differential σ(θ) using partial wave analysis. Comparison with experimental data from MAMI and GRAAL collaborations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.045206
2018TI10 Eur.Phys.J. A 54, 210 (2018) L.Tiator, M.Gorchtein, V.L.Kashevarov, K.Nikonov, M.Ostrick, M.Hadzimehmedovic, R.Omerovic, H.Osmanovic, J.Stahov, A.Svarc Eta and etaprime photoproduction on the nucleon with the isobar model EtaMAID2018 NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(γ, η), (γ, η')1H, E ≈ 1-3 GeV;1n(γ, η)1n, E ≈ 1-3 GeV; calculated σ using EtaMAID2018 code (updated isobar model EtaMAID); compared with published experimental data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2018-12643-x
2017AN19 Eur.Phys.J. A 53, 242 (2017) A.V.Anisovich, V.Burkert, M.Hadzimehmedovic, D.G.Ireland, E.Klempt, V.A.Nikonov, R.Omerovic, A.V.Sarantsev, J.Stahov, U.Thoma N* resonances from KΛ amplitudes in sliced bins in energy NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(γ, K+)Λ, E not given;1H(π-, K0)Λ, E not given; calculated, analyzed σ(θ), Λ recoil polarization, spin rotation angle using Laurent+Pietarinen model; compared to ANL and RAL data for masses 1630-2130 MeV; deduced nucleon resonances at about 1.9 GeV with Jπ=(1/2)+, (3/2)+, (1/2)-, (3/2)-, (5/2)-.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2017-12443-x
2016TI11 Phys.Rev. C 94, 065204 (2016) L.Tiator, M.Doring, R.L.Workman, M.Hadzimehmedovic, H.Osmanovic, R.Omerovic, J.Stahov, A.Svarc Baryon transition form factors at the pole
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.065204
2015SV01 Phys.Rev. C 91, 015207 (2015) A.Svarc, M.Hadzimehmedovic, H.Osmanovic, J.Stahov, R.L.Workman Pole structure from energy-dependent and single-energy fits to GWU-SAID πN elastic scattering data
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.015207
2014SV01 Phys.Rev. C 89, 045205 (2014) A.Svarc, M.Hadzimehmedovic, R.Omerovic, H.Osmanovic, J.Stahov Poles of Karlsruhe-Helsinki KH80 and KA84 solutions extracted by using the Laurent-Pietarinen method
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.045205
2014SV02 Phys.Rev. C 89, 065208 (2014) A.Svarc, M.Hadzimehmedovic, H.Osmanovic, J.Stahov, L.Tiator, R.Workman Pole positions and residues from pion photoproduction using the Laurent-Pietarinen expansion method
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.89.065208
2013SV02 Phys.Rev. C 88, 035206 (2013) A.Svarc, M.Hadzimehmedovic, H.Osmanovic, J.Stahov, L.Tiator, R.L.Workman Introducing the Pietarinen expansion method into the single-channel pole extraction problem
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.035206
2011HA40 Phys.Rev. C 84, 035204 (2011) M.Hadzimehmedovic, S.Ceci, A.Svarc, H.Osmanovic, J.Stahov Poles as the only true resonant-state signals extracted from a worldwide collection of partial-wave amplitudes using only one, well controlled pole-extraction method
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.035204
2011OS02 Phys.Rev. C 84, 035205 (2011) H.Osmanovic, S.Ceci, A.Svarc, M.Hadzimehmedovic, J.Stahov Stability of the Zagreb realization of the Carnegie-Mellon-Berkeley coupled-channels unitary model
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.035205
Back to query form |