NSR Query Results


Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 11, 2024.

Search: Author = F.C.Teh

Found 2 matches.

Back to query form



2022GI04      Phys.Rev. C 105, 044321 (2022)

S.A.Gillespie, K.W.Brown, R.J.Charity, L.G.Sobotka, A.K.Anthony, J.Barney, A.Bonaccorso, B.A.Brown, J.Crosby, D.Dell'Aquila, J.Elson, J.Estee, A.Gade, M.Ghazali, G.Jhang, Y.Jin, B.Longfellow, W.G.Lynch, J.Pereira, M.Spieker, S.Sweany, F.C.E.Teh, A.Thomas, M.B.Tsang, C.Y.Tsang, D.Weisshaar, H.Y.Wu, K.Zhu

Proton decay spectroscopy of 28S and 30Cl

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 9Be(29S, n), (31Ar, p), E=150 MeV/nucleon; measured reaction products, Ep, Ip, Eγ, Iγ, (particle)p-coin, pγ-coin; deduced invariant mass, momentum distribution. Setup consisting of S800 spectrograph, Si-CsI(Tl) DSSD array of 128 concentric rings and 128 annular sectors, CAESAR CsI(Na) photon detection array, BC-400-type scintillation fiber detector at A1900 fragment separator (NSCL).

RADIOACTIVITY 28S(p), (2p) [from 9Be(29S, n), E=150 MeV/nucleon]; 30Cl(p), (2p) [from 9Be(29S, n), E=150 MeV/nucleon]; measured Ep, Ip, Eγ, Iγ, pγ-coin; deduced total decay kinetic energy, decay energy spectrum. 30Cl; deduced levels, J, π, S(p). 28S; deduced levels, J, π, spectroscopic factors. Comparison to previous experimental results and shell model calculations.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.044321
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.


2021JI15      Phys.Rev.Lett. 127, 262502 (2021)

Y.Jin, C.Y.Niu, K.W.Brown, Z.H.Li, H.Hua, A.K.Anthony, J.Barney, R.J.Charity, J.Crosby, D.Dell'Aquila, J.M.Elson, J.Estee, M.Ghazali, G.Jhang, J.G.Li, W.G.Lynch, N.Michel, L.G.Sobotka, S.Sweany, F.C.E.Teh, A.Thomas, C.Y.Tsang, M.B.Tsang, S.M.Wang, H.Y.Wu, C.X.Yuan, K.Zhu

First Observation of the Four-Proton Unbound Nucleus 18Mg

RADIOACTIVITY 18Mg(14O), (2p), (4p) [from 9Be(20Mg, X)18Mg, E=170 MeV/nucleon]; measured decay products, Ep, Ip, 18Mg, 16Ne; deduced decay energy spectra, level scheme, J, π, resonance parameters. Comparison with the Gamow shell model (GSM) calculations.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.262502
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.


Back to query form