NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal
NSR database version of April 26, 2024.
Search: Author = R.E.McClellan
Found 4 matches.
Back to query form
2024SA20
Phys.Rev.Lett. 132, 162501 (2024)
S.N.Santiesteban, S.Li, D.Abrams, S.Alsalmi, D.Androic, K.Aniol, J.Arrington, T.Averett, C.Ayerbe Gayoso, J.Bane, S.Barcus, J.Barrow, A.Beck, V.Bellini, H.Bhatt, D.Bhetuwal, D.Biswas, A.Camsonne, J.Castellanos, J.Chen, J.-P.Chen, D.Chrisman, M.E.Christy, C.Clarke, S.Covrig, R.Cruz-Torres, D.Day, D.Dutta, E.Fuchey, C.Gal, F.Garibaldi, T.N.Gautam, T.Gogami, J.Gomez, P.Gueye, T.J.Hague, J.O.Hansen, F.Hauenstein, W.Henry, D.W.Higinbotham, R.J.Holt, C.Hyde, K.Itabashi, M.Kaneta, A.Karki, A.T.Katramatou, C.E.Keppel, P.M.King, L.Kurbany, T.Kutz, N.Lashley-Colthirst, W.B.Li, H.Liu, N.Liyanage, E.Long, A.Lovato, J.Mammei, P.Markowitz, R.E.McClellan, F.Meddi, D.Meekins, R.Michaels, M.Mihovilovic, A.Moyer, S.Nagao, D.Nguyen, M.Nycz, M.Olson, L.Ou, V.Owen, C.Palatchi, B.Pandey, A.Papadopoulou, S.Park, T.Petkovic, S.Premathilake, V.Punjabi, R.D.Ransome, P.E.Reimer, J.Reinhold, S.Riordan, N.Rocco, V.M.Rodriguez, A.Schmidt, B.Schmookler, E.P.Segarra, A.Shahinyan, S.Sirca, K.Slifer, P.Solvignon, T.Su, R.Suleiman, L.Tang, Y.Tian, W.Tireman, F.Tortorici, Y.Toyama, K.Uehara, G.M.Urciuoli, D.Votaw, J.Williamson, B.Wojtsekhowski, S.Wood, Z.H.Ye, J.Zhang, X.Zheng
Novel Measurement of the Neutron Magnetic Form Factor from A=3 Mirror Nuclei
NUCLEAR REACTIONS 3H, 3He(e-, e-), E=2.222, 4.323 GeV; measured reaction products; deduced σ(θ, E), the neutron magnetic form factor using quasielastic scattering from the mirror nuclei. Comparison with available data. Hall A at Jefferson Lab (JLab).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.162501
Citations: PlumX Metrics
2022SU03
Prog.Theor.Exp.Phys. 2022, 013D01 (2022)
K.N.Suzuki, T.Gogami, B.Pandey, K.Itabashi, S.Nagao, K.Okuyama, S.N.Nakamura, L.Tang, D.Abrams, T.Akiyama, D.Androic, K.Aniol, C.Ayerbe Gayoso, J.Bane, S.Barcus, J.Barrow, V.Bellini, H.Bhatt, D.Bhetuwal, D.Biswas, A.Camsonne, J.Castellanos, J.-P.Chen, J.Chen, S.Covrig, D.Chrisman, R.Cruz-Torres, R.Das, E.Fuchey, K.Gnanvo, F.Garibaldi, T.Gautam, J.Gomez, P.Gueye, T.J.Hague, O.Hansen, W.Henry, F.Hauenstein, D.W.Higinbotham, C.E.Hyde, M.Kaneta, C.Keppel, T.Kutz, N.Lashley-Colthirst, S.Li, H.Liu, J.Mammei, P.Markowitz, R.E.McClellan, F.Meddi, D.Meekins, R.Michaels, M.Mihovilovic, A.Moyer, D.Nguyen, M.Nycz, V.Owen, C.Palatchi, S.Park, T.Petkovic, S.Premathilake, P.E.Reimer, J.Reinhold, S.Riordan, V.Rodriguez, C.Samanta, S.N.Santiesteban, B.Sawatzky, S.Sirca, K.Slifer, T.Su, Y.Tian, Y.Toyama, K.Uehara, G.M.Urciuoli, D.Votaw, J.Williamson, B.Wojtsekhowski, S.A.Wood, B.Yale, Z.Ye, J.Zhang, X.Zheng
The cross-section measurement for the 3H(e, e'K+)nnΛ reaction
NUCLEAR REACTIONS 3H(e-, e-'K+), E not given; measured reaction products; deduced σ(θ), missing mass. Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations.
doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptab158
Citations: PlumX Metrics
2021DO09
Nature(London) 590, 561 (2021), Pub.Correction Nature(London) 604, E26 (2022)
J.Dove, B.Kerns, R.E.McClellan, S.Miyasaka, D.H.Morton, K.Nagai, S.Prasad, F.Sanftl, M.B.C.Scott, A.S.Tadepalli, C.A.Aidala, J.Arrington, C.Ayuso, C.L.Barker, C.N.Brown, W.C.Chang, A.Chen, D.C.Christian, B.P.Dannowitz, M.Daugherity, M.Diefenthaler, L.El Fassi, D.F.Geesaman, R.Gilman, Y.Goto, L.Guo, R.Guo, T.J.Hague, R.J.Holt, D.Isenhower, E.R.Kinney, N.Kitts, A.Klein, D.W.Kleinjan, Y.Kudo, C.Leung, P.-J.Lin, K.Liu, M.X.Liu, W.Lorenzon, N.C.R.Makins, M.Mesquita de Medeiros, P.L.McGaughey, Y.Miyachi, I.Mooney, K.Nakahara, K.Nakano, S.Nara, J.-C.Peng, A.J.Puckett, B.J.Ramson, P.E.Reimer, J.G.Rubin, S.Sawada, T.Sawada, T.-A.Shibata, D.Su, M.Teo, B.G.Tice, R.S.Towell, S.Uemura, S.Watson, S.G.Wang, A.B.Wickes, J.Wu, Z.Xi, Z.Ye
The asymmetry of antimatter in the proton
NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1,2H(p, μ+), (p, μ-), E=120 GeV; measured reaction products. 1H; deduced antimatter asymmetry in the proton.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03282-z
Citations: PlumX Metrics
2020BA36
Phys.Rev. C 102, 015205 (2020)
S.K.Barcus, D.W.Higinbotham, R.E.McClellan
How analytic choices can affect the extraction of electromagnetic form factors from elastic electron scattering cross section data
NUCLEAR REACTIONS 1H(e, e), E=180, 315, 450, 585, 720, 855 MeV; analyzed Mainz experimental σ(E) data with 1422 cross section points and 31 normalization parameters using different regression algorithms with theory-motivated constraints, and fit with unbound and bound polynomials, and different binning choices; deduced total χ2, electromagnetic form factors. 1H; deduced proton charge radius, and proton electric form factor. Comparison with CODATA-2014 value.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.015205
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Back to query form
|