NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 29, 2024. Search: Author = M.Bao Found 21 matches. 2023LI38 Chin.Phys.C 47, 084104 (2023) Predictions of nuclear charge radii NUCLEAR STRUCTURE N>20; calculated nuclear charge radii at competitive accuracy. Comparison with he CR2013 database.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/acdb54
2021JI13 Chin.Phys.C 45, 094103 (2021) H.Jiang, Y.-j.Zhou, Y.Lei, J.-J.Shen, M.Bao Symmetric and asymmetric structural evolutions of Te isotopes across the N=82 shell closure NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 128,130,132,134,136,138,140Te; calculated low-lying energy levels, B(E2), g factors via the nucleon-pair approximation (NPA) of the shell model with phenomenological multipole-multipole interactions. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac0ce1
2020BA04 Phys.Rev. C 101, 014316 (2020) M.Bao, H.Jiang, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Low-lying states of even-even N=80 isotones within the nucleon-pair approximation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 130Sn, 132Te, 134Xe, 136Ba, 138Ce; calculated levels, J, π, B(E2), g factors, configurations and wave functions, Matrix elements for nucleon-pair basis states, overlap squared between the proton and neutron excitation configuration, and the NPA wave function using nucleon-pair approximation (NPA) of the shell model. Comparison with experimental data, and with other theoretical predictions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.014316
2020BA34 Phys.Rev. C 102, 014306 (2020) M.Bao, Y.Y.Zong, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Local relations of nuclear charge radii NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=28-96;N=28-126; calculated nuclear charge radii using three approaches: δRin-jp relations based on the independent particle shell model, δRnn relation from nonpairing interaction δVnn in nuclear binding energies, and linear dependence of nuclear charge radii in terms of valence nucleon numbers. Comparison with experimental data evaluated in CR2013 database of 944 nuclei. Z=28, A=56-81; Z=29, A=57-86; Z=30, A=58-86; Z=31, A=59-88; Z=32, A=60-89; Z=33, A=65-90; Z=34, A=65-91; Z=35, A=69-92; Z=36, A=69-96; Z=37, A=72-98; Z=38, A=72-100; Z=39, A=76-102; Z=40, A=77-102; Z=41, A=80-103; Z=42, A=80-108; Z=44, A=86-126; Z=45, A=93-130; Z=46, A=92-130; Z=47, A=94-133; Z=48, A=95-134; Z=49, A=98-135; Z=50, A=99-136; Z=51, A=111-137; Z=52, A=106-138; Z=53, A=117-139; Z=54, A=109-146; Z=55, A=115-146; Z=56, A=115-148; Z=57, A=125-143; Z=58, A=126-148; Z=59, A=131-145; Z=60, A=128-150; Z=62, A=131-154; Z=63, A=133-159; Z=64, A=135-160; Z=65, A=147-159; Z=66, A=146-173; Z=67, A=151-173; Z=68, A=150-177; Z=69, A=153-184; Z=70, A=152-188; Z=71, A=161-189; Z=72, A=163-196; Z=73, A=171-203; Z=74, A=170-204; Z=75, A=185-207; Z=76, A=175-208; Z=77, A=182-209; Z=78, A=178-210; Z=79, A=183-211; Z=80, A=181-214; Z=81, A=183-209; Z=82, A=182-216; Z=83, A=202-213; Z=84, A=192-220; Z=86, A=195-227; Z=87, A=206-228; Z=88, A=205-232; Z=90, A=226-236; Z=92, A=229-238; Z=94, A=235-244; Z=95, A=241-245; Z=96, A=242-248; calculated unknown nuclear charge radii for 830 nuclei using the same three approaches, and listed in a data file in the Supplementary material of the paper.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.014306
2020MA19 Phys.Rev. C 101, 045204 (2020) C.Ma, M.Bao, Z.M.Niu, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima New extrapolation method for predicting nuclear masses ATOMIC MASSES 121Rh, 123Pd, 129,131Cd, 138Sb, 141I, 149Ba, 150,151La, 137Eu, 190Tl, 215Pb, 194Bi, 198At, 197,198,202,232,233Fr, 201Ra, 205,206Ac, 215,216,221,222U, 219Np, 229Am, 259No; A=20-260; Z=36-106, N=56-160; calculated mass excesses using method based on the Garvey-Kelson mass relations and the Jannecke mass formulas. Comparison with evaluated data in AME2016, and other theoretical predictions over the entire chart of nuclides. Z=43-106, A=120-273; predicted masses in Supplemental material for about 600 nuclei for which no experimental data exist. Z=8-106, N=10-157; deduced parameters for each prediction of masses based on AME2016, listed in Supplemental material.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.045204
2019YU03 Phys.Rev. C 100, 014314 (2019) H.C.Yu, M.Q.Lin, M.Bao, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Empirical formulas for nuclear separation energies NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100Zn, 112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137Mo, 151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186Ba, 204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239W; calculated S(n) and S(p) using empirical formulas. Comparison with AME-2016 evaluation, and with other theoretical model predictions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.014314
2019ZO02 Phys.Rev. C 100, 054315 (2019) Y.Y.Zong, M.Q.Lin, M.Bao, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Mass relations of corresponding mirror nuclei ATOMIC MASSES 21Na, 22,23Mg, 23,24,25Al, 24,25,26,27Si, 26,27,28,29P, 28,29,30,31S, 30,31,32,33Cl, 32,33,34,35Ar, 34,35,36,37K, 36,37,38,39Ca, 38,39,40,41Sc, 40,41,42,43Ti, 42,43,44,45V, 44,45,46,47Cr, 46,47,48,49Mn, 48,49,50,51Fe, 50,51,52,53Co, 52,53,54,55Ni, 54,55,56,57Cu, 56,57,58,59Zn, 58,59,60,61Ga, 60,61,62,63Ge, 62,63,64,65As, 64,65,66,67Se, 66,67,68,69Br, 68,69,70,71Kr, 70,71,72,73Rb, 72,73,74,75Sr, 74,75,76,77Y, 76,77,78,79Zr, 79,80Nb, 81,83Mo, 83,85Tc, 85,86,87Ru, 87,88Rh, 89Pd; calculated mass excesses, S(n), S(p) using mass relations for corresponding mirror nuclei, and compared with AME2016 values; deduced regularities related to neutron-proton interactions, and to separation energies for mirror nuclei.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054315
2017BA11 Phys.Rev. C 95, 044310 (2017) M.Bao, Y.Y.Cheng, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Local mass relations and the NpNn scheme NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=82-104, N=126-155; analyzed Castens NpNn scheme for nuclear masses, and charge radii of four neighboring nuclei. N=10-160; analyzed energies and B(E2) for the first 2+ states of four neighboring even-even nuclei.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.044310
2017QI03 Phys.Rev. C 96, 024307 (2017) From local correlations to regional systematics NUCLEAR STRUCTURE A=120-230, Z=38-104; analyzed correlations between the energies and B(E2) values for the first 2+ states in even-even nuclei using logarithmically scaled NpNn products. Z=82-104, N=126-155; analyzed Q(α), S(n), and S(p) experimental data by decoupling into their proton and neutron contributions.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.96.024307
2016BA03 Phys.Rev. C 93, 014307 (2016) Number of states for identical particles
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.014307
2016BA54 Phys.Rev. C 94, 044323 (2016) M.Bao, Y.Lu, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Simple relations between masses of mirror nuclei ATOMIC MASSES A=3-110; Z=2-56, N=1-54; deduced a relation between difference of neutron and proton separation energies, and difference of Coulomb energies between two mirror nuclei; deduced mass excesses of nuclei and compared with AME-2012 values.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.044323
2016BA64 Phys.Rev. C 94, 064315 (2016) M.Bao, Y.Lu, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Predictions of nuclear charge radii NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=6-95, N=10-150; analyzed charge radii for nuclei using empirical formulas and CR1999, CR2004 and CR2013 databases for charge radii; predicted values for unknown charge radii of ground states of 1085 nuclei.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.064315
2015CH10 Phys.Rev. C 91, 024313 (2015) Y.Y.Cheng, M.Bao, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Wigner energy and nuclear mass relations ATOMIC MASSES A=5-80; 58Cu, 98In; calculated Wigner energy, pairing and symmetry energies, binding-energy difference between the lowest T=0 and T=1 states of odd-odd N=Z nuclei by using local mass relations, in the first-order approximation. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.024313
2014BA36 Phys.Rev. C 90, 024314 (2014) M.Bao, Z.He, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Simple relations for α-decay energies of neighboring nuclei RADIOACTIVITY N=110-180, A>200(α); deduced simple relationships of α-decay energies for four neighboring nuclei based on the longitudinal Garvey-Kelson relation, and its odd-even features; deduced deviations of predicted Q(α) values in comparison with experimental data from AME-2012. 275,276,277,278,279,280,281Ds, 276,277,279,280,281,282,283,284,285Rg, 278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287Cn, 280,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289Nh, 283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291Fl, 285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292Mc, 287,288,289,290,291,292,293Lv, 290,291,292,293,294Ts, 292,293,294,295Og(α); deduced Q(α) using derived formula and half-lives from Viola-Seaborg-Sobiczewski (VSS) formula. Improved predictions for Q(α) values of nuclei in the superheavy element (SHE) region. Comparison with available experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.024314
2014HE31 Phys.Rev. C 90, 054320 (2014) Z.He, M.Bao, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Improved Janecke mass formula ATOMIC MASSES Z>5, N>9; analyzed masses for 2275 nuclei with a new version of the Janecke formula. Comparison with predicted results of other mass models.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054320
2014JI16 Phys.Rev. C 90, 064303 (2014) H.Jiang, M.Bao, L.-W.Chen, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima I4 dependence in nuclear symmetry energy
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.90.064303
2013BA14 Phys.Rev. C 87, 044313 (2013) M.Bao, Z.He, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Empirical formulas for nucleon separation energies NUCLEAR STRUCTURE N=20-160, Z=10-110; calculated deviations in S(n) and S(p) values with respect to experimental data in AME-2012. 70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105Zn, 112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142Mo, 151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191Ba, 229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269Au; calculated Sn using an empirical formula with symmetry energy corrections. Comparison with previous theoretical calculations, and with mass evaluations in AME-2003 and AME-2012.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.044313
2013BA60 Phys.Rev. C 88, 064325 (2013) M.Bao, Z.He, Y.Lu, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Generalized Garvey-Kelson mass relations ATOMIC MASSES A>16; analyzed Garvey-Kelson mass relations with deviations from experimental data with a different parity of proton and neutron numbers; deduced eight new generalized Garvey-Kelson mass relations; odd-even staggering.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064325
2013HE12 Phys.Rev. C 87, 057304 (2013) Z.He, M.Bao, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima New features of the Garvey-Kelson mass relations
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.057304
2012FU11 Phys.Rev. C 86, 054303 (2012) G.J.Fu, M.Bao, Z.He, H.Jiang, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Pairing interactions and one-nucleon separation energies NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=4-104, N=4-160; analyzed empirical proton-neutron, proton-proton, and neutron-neutron pairing and nonpairing interactions using binding energies and separation energies from 2011-AME pre-review database. Discussed Odd-even staggering of one-nucleon separation energies.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.054303
2012JI09 Phys.Rev. C 86, 014327 (2012) H.Jiang, G.J.Fu, M.Bao, Z.He, Y.M.Zhao, A.Arima Nucleon separation energies in the valence correlation scheme ATOMIC MASSES Z=29-104, N=39-154; analyzed S(n), S(p), S(2n), S(2p) using AME-2011; deduced linear relations between separation energies, odd-even staggering. Discussed predictive power of the simple relations.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.014327
Back to query form |