NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = J.Acharya Found 6 matches. 2024VI01 J.Phys.(London) G51, 035103 (2024) Vikas, Kavita, K.S.Golda, T.K.Ghosh, A.Jhingan, P.Sugathan, A.Chatterjee, B.R.Behera, A.Kumar, R.Kumar, N.Saneesh, Mohit, A.Yadav, C.Yadav, S.Appannababu, S.K.Duggi, R.Dubey, K.Rani, N.Kumar, A.Banerjee, A.Rani, Kajal, Sh.Noor, J.Acharya, H.Singh Measurement of mass-angle and mass-total kinetic energy distributions from the fission of 190Pt compound nucleus NUCLEAR REACTIONS 178Hf(12C, X)190Pt, E=60-88.2 MeV; measured reaction products, fission fragments; deduced excitation energies, excitation energy at saddle point, measured mean mass-total kinetic energy (TKE), dependence of mean mass ratio as a function of mean center of mass emission angle, mass-energy correlations, TKE distributions are well described with the single Gaussian fits. The General Purpose Scattering Chamber facility at Inter University Accelerator Centre (IUAC), New Delhi.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ad1f2f
2022JO03 Eur.Phys.J. A 58, 40 (2022) C.Joshi, H.Kumawat, R.K.Singh, N.L.Singh, D.Patel, B.K.Nayak, J.Acharya, A.Parihari, K.Rani, S.D.Sharma, G.Kaur, I.Ahmed, K.S.Golda, N.Saneesh, M.Kumar, A.Jhingan, P.Sugathan Exploring breakup coupling effect in 7Li+92, 100Mo elastic scattering around Coulomb barrier energies NUCLEAR REACTIONS 92,100Mo(7Li, 7Li), E=15-35 MeV; measured reaction products; deduced σ, optical model potentials. Comparison with continuum-discretized coupled-channels calculations. The General Purpose Scattering Chamber (GPSC) facility at Inter University Accelerator Centre (IUAC), New Delhi.
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00690-1
2020AC02 Nucl.Phys. A996, 121795 (2020) J.Acharya, S.Mukherjee, G.F.Steyn, S.V.Fortsch, F.D.Smit, R.T.Newman, J.J.Lawrie, O.V.Fotina, A.Chatterjee Non-equilibrium emission of alpha particles in the interaction of 14N with 59Co and 93Nb at incident energy of 250 MeV
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121695
2019KA38 Phys.Rev. C 100, 024626 (2019) Kavita, K.S.Golda, T.K.Ghosh, A.Jhingan, P.Sugathan, A.Chatterjee, B.R.Behera, Ashok Kumar, R.Kumar, N.Saneesh, M.Kumar, A.Yadav, C.Yadav, N.Kumar, A.Banerjee, A.Rani, S.K.Duggi, R.Dubey, K.Rani, S.Noor, J.Acharya, H.Singh Fusion-fission dynamics of 188, 190Pt through fission fragment mass distribution measurements NUCLEAR REACTIONS 160Gd(28Si, X)188Pt*, E=120, 125, 130, 135, 140 MeV; 178Hf(12C, X)190Pt*, E=70, 75, 80, 83.5, 88.2 MeV; measured reaction products, TOF, (fragment)(fragment)-coin, mass-yield distribution; deduced velocity distribution and mass ratio of fission fragments, width of the fission fragment distributions and the excitation energies. Comparison of width of mass distributions with saddle-point model. Measurement was performed at the Inter-university Accelerator Centre (IUAC), New Delhi, India.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024626
2018AC05 Phys.Rev. C 97, 034607 (2018) Ja.Acharya, S.Mukherjee, A.Chatterjee, N.L.Singh, K.Ramachandran, P.C.Rout, K.Mahata, V.Desai, E.T.Mirgule, S.V.Suryanarayana, B.K.Nayak, A.Saxena, G.F.Steyn Neutron emission in 19F-induced reactions NUCLEAR REACTIONS 51V, 89Y, 181Ta(19F, X), E=130, 140, 145, 150 MeV; measured neutron energy spectra by time-of-flight method, neutron emission differential σ(θ, E) at BARC-TIFR Pelletron-LINAC facility. Comparison with theoretical cross sections from the nuclear reaction code ALICE2014 with two density models. Comparison of experimental n(θ) with theoretical calculations using statistical model code Projection Angular-Momentum Coupled Evaporation (PACE4) and ALICE2014.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034607
2016AC01 Phys.Rev. C 93, 024608 (2016) J.Acharya, S.Mukherjee, G.F.Steyn, N.L.Singh, A.Chatterjee Excitation functions of heavy residues produced in the 14N + 103Rh reaction up to 400 MeV: Analysis of the pre-equilibrium mechanism with the hybrid Monte Carlo simulation model NUCLEAR REACTIONS 103Rh(14N, X)94Tc/95Tc/96Tc/95Ru/97Ru/97Rh/99Rh/101Rh/99Pd/100Pd/101Pd/103Ag/104Ag/105Ag/104Cd, E=89.4-400.0 MeV; measured Eγ, Iγ, σ(E) by activation method at iThemba LABS. Comparison with theoretical calculations using the hybrid Monte Carlo simulation model and ALICE2014 code with different level density models. Best agreement with Obninsk level densities.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.024608
Back to query form |