NSR Query Results

Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 29, 2024.

Search: Author = I.A.Abdul-Magead

Found 13 matches.

Back to query form

2024IS01      Phys.Rev. C 109, 014606 (2024)

M.Ismail, S.G.Abd-Elnasser, A.Adel, I.A.M.Abdul-Magead, H.M.Elsharkawy

Systematic investigation of α- and cluster-decay modes in superheavy nuclei

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.109.014606
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023FA13      J.Phys.(London) G50, 125102 (2023)

F.A.Fareed, W.M.Seif, A.Adel, I.A.M.Abdul-Magead

Signatures of elongated and compact configurations in the fusion barrier distribution of deformed nuclei

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁸⁹Y(³⁴S, X), ⁴⁰Ca(³²S, X), ¹²⁰Sn(²⁸Si, X), ⁹⁶Zr(⁴⁰Ca, X), ¹⁹²Os(⁴⁰Ca, X), ¹⁹⁴Pt(⁴⁰Ca, X), E(cm)<200 MeV; calculated fusion σ using the coupled-channel method, starting from orientation-dependent folding potentials based on M3Y-Reid nucleon–nucleon interaction, with coupling to the anticipated vibrational and rotational excitations in projectile and target nuclei; deduce the signature of the hot fusion process within the compact configuration of the participating deformed nuclei is always evident in the extracted fusion barrier distribution. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/acff10
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023IS01      Nucl.Phys. A1029, 122547 (2023)

M.Ismail, S.G.Abd-Elnasser, H.M.Elsharkawy, I.A.M.Abdul-Magead

Alpha decay around shell closures and correlation of half-life times with the neutron energy levels of the emitting nuclei

RADIOACTIVITY ^{108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122}Ba, ^124,126Ba, ^{154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186}Hf, ¹⁰⁶Te, ^108,109Te, ^109,110Xe, ^112,113Xe, ¹¹⁴Ba, ¹⁴⁴Nd, ^146,147,148Sm, ^{148,149,150,151,152}Gd, ^{150,151,152,153,154}Dy, ¹⁵²Er, ^154,155Er, ^154,156,158Yb, ^156,157,158Hf, ^160,162Hf, ^162,163,164W, ¹⁶⁶W, ^161,162Os, ^{166,167,168,169,170}Os, ^172,173,174Os, ¹⁸⁴Os, ^{168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190}Pt, ^172,174Hg, ^{175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188}Hg, ^{178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194}Pb(α); calculated T_1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122547
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the XUNDL database. For more information, click here.

2023LU13      Physics of Part.and Nuclei 54, 734 (2023)

V.K.Lukyanov, E.V.Zemlyanaya, K.V.Lukyanov, I.Abdul-Magead

Theoretical Analysis of Pion-Nucleus Scattering at Energies of the (3, 3) Pion-Nucleon Resonance

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁸Si, ⁴⁰Ca, ⁵⁸Ni, ²⁰⁸Pb(π, π), (π, π'), E=130-290 MeV; calculated σ(θ) using two models for constructing the pion–nucleus potential. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1134/S1063779623040238
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022AB02      Phys.Rev. C 105, 014626 (2022)

I.A.M.Abdul-Magead, B.Abu-Ibrahim

Neutron skin of neutron-rich nuclei

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹²C(p, p), E=250, 300 MeV; analyzed and fitted σ(θ, E) experimental data. ¹²C(²¹F, X), (²²F, X), (²³F, X), (²⁴F, X), (²⁵F, X), (²⁶F, X), (²⁷F, X), (²⁹F, X), (²¹Ne, X), (²²Ne, X), (²³Ne, X), (²⁴Ne, X), (²⁵Ne, X), (²⁶Ne, X), (²⁷Ne, X), (²⁸Ne, X), (²⁹Ne, X), (³⁰Ne, X), (³¹Ne, X), (³²Ne, X), (²⁴Na, X), (²⁵Na, X), (²⁶Na, X), (²⁷Na, X), (²⁸Na, X), (²⁹Na, X), (³⁰Na, X), (³¹Na, X), (³²Na, X), (³³Na, X), (³⁴Na, X), (³⁵Na, X), (²⁵Mg, X), (²⁶Mg, X), (²⁷Mg, X), (²⁸Mg, X), (²⁹Mg, X), (³⁰Mg, X), (³¹Mg, X), (³²Mg, X), (³³Mg, X), (³⁴Mg, X), (³⁵Mg, X), (³⁶Mg, X), (³⁷Mg, X), (³⁸Mg, X), (⁴⁵Ca, X), (⁴⁶Ca, X), (⁴⁷Ca, X), (⁴⁸Ca, X), (⁴⁹Ca, X), (⁵⁰Ca, X), (⁵¹Ca, X), E=250, 300 MeV/nucleon; calculated reaction cross sections σ(E); deduced root-mean-square neutron radii and neutron skins of these neutron-rich nuclei from experimental data and calculations; neutron skins exhibited a linear relationship with the isospin (N-Z)/A.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.014626
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021LU05      Nucl.Phys. A1010, 122190 (2021)

V.K.Lukyanov, E.V.Zemlyanaya, K.V.Lukyanov, I.Abdul-Magead

Analysis of the pion-nucleus scattering within the folding and the Kisslinger type potentials

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁸Si, ⁴⁰Ca, ⁵⁸Ni, ²⁰⁸Pb(π⁺, π⁺), (π^-, π^-), E=130-290 MeV; calculated σ(θ), folding optical potential (OP) and the local modified Kisslinger-type OP. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122190
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020AB03      Nucl.Phys. A1000, 121804 (2020)

I.A.M.Abdul-Magead, B.Abu-Ibrahim

Contribution of the projectile neutrons to the total charge-changing cross sections

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121804
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020AB15      J.Phys.(London) G47, 055103 (2020)

I.A.M.Abdul-Magead, E.Hamza, B.Abu-Ibrahim

Neutron radii and neutron skin of neutron-rich nuclei deduced from proton-nucleus total reaction cross sections

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹H(¹²C, X), (²²C, X), (⁹Be, X), (¹⁴Be, X), E=40 MeV/nucleon; analyzed available data. ²²C, ¹⁴Be; deduced neutron radii.

doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ab752c
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019FA06      Nucl.Phys. A989, 21 (2019)

M.Y.H.Farag, E.H.Esmael, I.A.M.Abdul-Magead, S.S.Mousa

New empirical formulae for the in-medium nucleon-nucleon cross-section

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹H(n, x), (p, x), E=40-1000 MeV/nucleon; calculated σ using Glauber model, developed new empirical formula yielding results close to those calculated; deduced formula parameters, application of the formula to the absorption σ of protons on ⁴He - ²⁷Al.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.05.011
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019SE03      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E28, 1950009 (2019)

W.M.Seif, M.Ismail, I.A.M.Abdul-Magead, F.A.Fareed

Influence of the deformation and orientation on the interaction potential of the ²⁸Si + ²⁸Si system and its fusion process

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²⁸Si(²⁸Si, X), E(cm)<40 MeV; calculated fusion σ. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1142/S0218301319500095
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2016IS01      Can.J.Phys. 94, 102 (2016)

M.Ismail, I.A.M.Abdul-Magead

Comparison between different proximity potentials and the double-folding model for spherical-deformed interacting nuclei

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²³⁸Pu(⁴⁸Ca, X), E not given; calculated Coulomb barrier parameters. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1139/cjp-2015-0280
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2014IS01      Nucl.Phys. A922, 168 (2014)

M.Ismail, I.A.M.Abdul-Magead

Examples of the failure of proximity approach when the nuclear surface is irregular or has concave regions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁴⁸Ca(⁴⁸Ca, X), E not given;¹⁵⁰Nd(¹⁵⁰Nd, X), E not given;²²⁶Ra(⁶⁰Cr, X), E not given;²⁴⁴Pu(⁴⁹Ca, X), E not given;²²⁶Ra(¹⁴⁶Ce, X), E not given; calculated Coulomb radius, fusion barrier, potential energy surface vs deformation for different deformations and orienattions using DFM (double folding model).

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.12.005
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2012IS06      Nucl.Phys. A888, 34 (2012)

M.Ismail, I.A.M.Abdul-Magead

Comparative study of Coulomb barrier parameters for deformed nuclei using double-folding model and proximity approach

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁵⁰Nd(¹⁵⁰Nd, X), ¹⁸⁰Hf(⁸⁶Kr, X), ²³⁸Pu(⁴⁸Ar, X), E not given; calculated Coulomb barrier parameters vs deformation axis using double folding model with proximity approach.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2012.05.011
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Note: The following list of authors and aliases matches the search parameter I.A.Abdul-Magead: , I.A.ABDUL-MAGEAD