NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of May 10, 2024. Search: Author = A.R.Abdulghany Found 11 matches. 2024SE04 Phys.Rev. C 109, 044326 (2024) Stability and fine structure of α decay of isomers in the trans-tin region of the nuclear chart and their single-particle structure
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.109.044326
2023SE15 Phys.Rev. C 108, 024308 (2023) Stability and α decay of translead isomers and the related preformation probability of α particles RADIOACTIVITY 187,187m,191,191mPb, 187,187m,189,189m,190,190m,193,193m,194,194m,195,195m,196,196m,197,197m,210,210m,212,212mBi, 193,193m,195,195m,197,197m,199,199m,201,201m,211,211m,212,212mPo, 191,191m,193,193m,195,195m,197,197m,198,198m,199,199m,200,200m,202,202m,212,212m,214,214mAt, 195,195m,197,197m,199,199m,201,201m,203,203mRn, 199,199m,200,200,201,201m,202,202m,203,203m,204,204m,206,206m,214,214m,215,215m,216,216m,218,218mFr, 203,203m,205,205m,207,207m,213,213m,214,214mRa, 206,206m,208,208m,216,216m,217,217mAc, 216,216mTh, 217,217mPa, 216,216m,218,218mU(α); calculated T1/2 for ground an isomeric states α-decay, preformation probability. The preformed cluster model. Comparison to experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.024308
2022AB05 Nucl.Phys. A1018, 122376 (2022) Nuclear surface parameters revisited NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 12C, 14N, 16O, 26Mg, 27Al, 28,29,30Si, 31P, 32,34,36S, 40Ar, 40Ca, 48Ca, 48,50Ti, 50,52,54Cr, 54,56,58Fe, 59Co, 60,62,64Ni, 63,65Cu, 64,66,68,70Zn, 70,72,74,76Ge, 88Sr, 90,92,94Zr, 92,94,96,98,100Mo, 104,106,108,110Pd, 154Gd, 166Er, 192Os, 196Pt, 203,205Tl, 204Hg, 204,206,208Pb, 209Bi; calculated surface and central radii, surface widths, fusion barrier heights. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122376
2022SE10 Int.J.Mod.Phys. E31, 2250074 (2022) W.M.Seif, A.R.Abdulghany, A.Nasr Macroscopic-microscopic calculations of the ground state properties of Z = 120 isotopes and their α-decay chains RADIOACTIVITY 270,271,272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293,294,295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308,309,310,311,312,313,314120(α); calculated the total energy surfaces, ground state masses, binding energy, deformations and fissionability, T1/2 using macroscopic-microscopic scheme based on the Skyrme energy density functional, the Woods-Saxon single-particle potential and Strutinsky's method.
doi: 10.1142/S0218301322500744
2021AD17 Phys.Scr. 96, 125314 (2021) Proton radioactivity and α-decay of neutron-deficient nuclei RADIOACTIVITY 109I, 112Cs, 157Ta, 160,161Re, 165,166,167Ir, 170,171Au, 177Tl, 185Bi, 113Cs, 117La, 121Pr, 130,131Eu, 135Tb, 140,141Ho, 145,147Tm, 150,151Lu, 155,156Ta, 159Re, 176Tl(p), 109I, 112Cs, 157Ta, 160,161Re, 165,166,167Ir, 170,171Au, 177Tl, 185Bi, 105,106,107Te, 108I, 110,111,112Xe, 154Yb, 155Lu, 156,157Hf, 158,159Ta, 158,159,160,161W, 162,163Re, 161,162,163,164,165,166Os, 167,168Ir, 166,167,168,169,170Pt, 172Au, 171,172,173,174,175Hg, 177Tl, 178,179Pb(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac33f6
2021SE10 J.Phys.(London) G48, 025111 (2021) W.M.Seif, A.R.Abdulghany, Z.N.Hussein Change in neutron skin thickness after cluster-decay RADIOACTIVITY 215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243U(28Mg), (24Ne), (26Ne); calculated Q-values, T1/2, change in neutron-skin thickness, the isospin-asymmetry using self-consistent Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov based on Skyrme-SLy4 effective nucleon-nucleon interaction.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/abd233
2020AB07 Chin.Phys.C 44, 084103 (2020) Investigation of neutron density distribution of 208Pb nucleus when the proton density is constrained to its experimental distribution NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb; calculated neutron distributions; deduceddistribution formula.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/44/8/084103
2020IS11 Phys.Atomic Nuclei 83, 691 (2020) M.Ismail, A.Abdurrahman, A.R.Abdulghany Correlation Between the Behavior of α-Decay Half-Life Time and Q Values with Neutron Number Variation of Daughter Nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=80-122; analyzed available data for α-decay of 2000 nuclei; calculated T1/2 using the density-dependent cluster model with M3Y-effective nucleon-nucleon interaction.
doi: 10.1134/S1063778820050130
2019SE02 Ann.Phys.(New York) 401, 149 (2019) W.M.Seif, H.Anwer, A.R.Abdulghany Ground-state and stability properties of 288-308118Og isotopes based on semi-microscopic calculations NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293Og, 295,296,297,298,299,300,301,302,303,304,305,306,307,308Og; calculated the ground-state masses, binding energy, deformations and fission barriers using the total energy surfaces produced in a multidimensional deformation space using the dynamical differential evolution optimization method, the Q-values of the different decay modes and the nucleon separation energies for each isotope, and its α-decay (Tα) and spontaneous fission T1/2.
doi: 10.1016/j.aop.2018.12.002
2016IS04 Nucl.Phys. A947, 64 (2016) M.Ismail, A.Y.Ellithi, A.Adel, A.R.Abdulghany Toward a better parameterization of nuclear density for α-decay calculation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb; calculated neutron and proton density distribution, radius using proton and neutron densities given by 3pF (Three Parameter Fermi) distributions with neutron and proton radii and using HFB. RADIOACTIVITY 186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218Po(α); calculated T1/2 using α-daughter potential, daughter proton and neutron densities given by 3pF (Three Parameter Fermi) distributions with neutron and proton radii and using HF density, α-preformation factor. T1/2 compared to data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2015.12.008
2015IS04 J.Phys.(London) G42, 075108 (2015) M.Ismail, A.Y.Ellithi, A.Adel, A.R.Abdulghany Effect of deformations on the binding energy of centrally depressed nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb, 238U, 252Cf, 280Cn, 285,286,287,288,289,298Fl, 306120, 320126, 339136, 500174; calculated binding energies, proton radii, quadrupole and hexadecapole deformations. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/42/7/075108
Back to query form |