NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = A.Martinou Found 12 matches. 2023BO09 J.Phys.(London) G50, 075105 (2023) D.Bonatsos, A.Martinou, S.K.Peroulis, T.J.Mertzimekis, N.Minkov Signatures for shape coexistence and shape/phase transitions in even-even nuclei NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 40Ar, 40,42Ca, 70,72Ge, 72Se, 96,98Sr, 98,100Zr, 100,102Mo, 104Ru, 110Pd, 112,116Cd, 114,116,118Sn, 126Xe, 148,150Nd, 152,154Sm, 152,154,156,158Gd, 166Er, 172,174Yb, 186,192Os, 196Pt; analyzed available data; deduced systematics of B(E2) transition rates connecting the first excited 0+2 state of the ground state band in even–even nuclei, shape coexistence of the ground state band.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/acd70b
2022BO05 Phys.Lett. B 829, 137099 (2022) D.Bonatsos, K.E.Karakatsanis, A.Martinou, T.J.Mertzimekis, N.Minkov Microscopic origin of shape coexistence in the N=90, Z=64 region NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198Po, 104,106,108,110,112,114,116,118,120,122,124,126,128,130Te, 70,72,74,76,78,80,82,84,86,88Zr; calculated single particle states using standard covariant density functional theory; deduced shape coexistence.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137099
2022BO16 Phys.Rev. C 106, 044323 (2022) D.Bonatsos, K.E.Karakatsanis, A.Martinou, T.J.Mertzimekis, N.Minkov Islands of shape coexistence from single-particle spectra in covariant density functional theory NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 68,70,90Zn, 70,72,92Ge, 72,74,92,94Se, 74,76,94,96Kr, 68,70,72,74,76,78,80,82,84,86,96,98Sr, 72,74,76,78,80,82,84,86,88,98,100Zr, 100,102Mo, 102,104Ru, 104,106Pd, 106,108Cd, 104,106,108,110,112,114,116,118,120,122,124,126,128,130,142,144,146,148Te, 144,146,148,150Xe, 146,148,150,152Ba, 148,150,152,154Ce, 150,152,154,156Nd, 152,154,156,158Sm, 154,156,158,160Gd, 156,158,160,162Dy, 158,160,162,164Er, 160,162,164,166Yb, 162,164,166,168Hf, 164,166,168,170W, 166,168,170,172Os, 170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200Pt, 172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194Hg, 174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196Pb, 176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198Po; calculated proton single-particle energy levels, potential energy surface. Covariant density functional theory with the DDME2 functional. Searched for regions with p-h excitations which are attributed to the shape coexistence. Islands of shape coexistence are identified at Z=82 and Z=50, and around the relevant neutron midshells N=104 and N=66.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.044323
2022HA30 Nucl.Phys. A1028, 122540 (2022) M.M.Hammad, A.Martinou, D.Bonatsos Algebraic solutions for o(12) ← → u(2) (x) u(10) quantum phase transitions in the proton-neutron interacting boson model
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122540
2021BO08 Nucl.Phys. A1009, 122158 (2021) D.Bonatsos, I.E.Assimakis, A.Martinou, S.Sarantopoulou, S.K.Peroulis, N.Minkov Energy differences of ground state and γ1ands as a hallmark of collective behavior
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2021.122158
2021MA25 Eur.Phys.J. A 57, 84 (2021) A.Martinou, D.Bonatsos, T.J.Mertzimekis, K.E.Karakatsanis, I.E.Assimakis, S.K.Peroulis, S.Sarantopoulou, N.Minkov The islands of shape coexistence within the Elliott and the proxy-SU(3) Models NUCLEAR STRUCTURE N=120-190; analyzed available data; deduced nucleon number systematics.
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00396-w
2021MA26 Eur.Phys.J. A 57, 83 (2021) A.Martinou, D.Bonatsos, K.E.Karakatsanis, S.Sarantopoulou, I.E.Assimakis, S.K.Peroulis, N.Minkov Why nuclear forces favor the highest weight irreducible representations of the fermionic SU(3) symmetry NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 208Pb; analyzed available data; deduced prolate to oblate shape transitions.
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00395-x
2020BO16 Eur.Phys.J. Special Topics 229, 2367 (2020) D.Bonatsos, A.Martinou, S.Sarantopoulou, I.E.Assimakis, S.Peroulis, N.Minkov Parameter-free predictions for the collective deformation variables b and γ within the pseudo-SU(3) scheme NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 142,144,146,148,150,152,154,156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180Ce, 146,148,150,152,154,156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184Sm, 148,150,152,154,156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186Dy, 154,156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194Yb, 158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194W, 162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202Pt; calculated distribution of valence protons and valence neutrons, weight of irreducible representations, collective deformation parameters.
doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2020-000034-3
2020MA49 Eur.Phys.J. A 56, 239 (2020) A.Martinou, D.Bonatsos, N.Minkov, I.E.Assimakis, S.K.Peroulis, S.Sarantopoulou, J.Cseh Proxy-SU(3) symmetry in the shell model basis
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00239-0
2017BO11 Phys.Rev. C 95, 064325 (2017) D.Bonatsos, I.E.Assimakis, N.Minkov, A.Martinou, R.B.Cakirli, R.F.Casten, K.Blaum Proxy-SU(3) symmetry in heavy deformed nuclei
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064325
2017BO12 Phys.Rev. C 95, 064326 (2017) D.Bonatsos, I.E.Assimakis, N.Minkov, A.Martinou, S.Sarantopoulou, R.B.Cakirli, R.F.Casten, K.Blaum Analytic predictions for nuclear shapes, prolate dominance, and the prolate-oblate shape transition in the proxy-SU(3) model NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 112,114,116,118,120,122,124,126,128,130,144,146,148,150,152,154,156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176Ba, 114,116,118,120,122,124,126,128,130,132,134,146,148,150,152,154,156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178Ce, 116,118,120,122,124,126,128,130,132,134,136,148,150,152,154,156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180Nd, 118,120,122,124,126,128,130,132,134,136,138,152,154,156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182Sm, 120,122,124,126,128,130,132,134,136,138,140,154,156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184Gd, 122,124,126,128,130,132,134,136,138,140,142,156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186Dy, 124,126,128,130,132,134,136,138,140,142,146,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188Er, 126,128,130,132,134,136,138,140,142,146,148,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190Yb, 128,130,132,134,136,138,140,142,146,148,150,162,164,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192Hf, 130,132,134,136,138,140,142,146,148,150,152,166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194W, 132,134,136,138,140,142,146,148,150,152,154,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196Os, 134,136,138,140,142,146,148,150,152,154,156,178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194,196,198Pt; calculated β and γ deformations using a new approximate analytic parameter-free proxy-SU(3) model. Comparison with empirical results.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064326
2015BO05 Phys.Rev. C 91, 054315 (2015) D.Bonatsos, A.Martinou, N.Minkov, S.Karampagia, D.Petrellis Octupole deformation in light actinides within an analytic quadrupole octupole axially symmetric model with a Davidson potential NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 222,224,226Ra, 224,226Th; calculated levels, J, π, B(E1), BE(2), B(E3). Analytic quadrupole octupole axially (AQOA) symmetric model using Davidson potential. Bohr collective Hamiltonian, and quadrupole plus octupole deformation. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.054315
Back to query form |