ADOPTED LEVELS for 4He

Authors: J. H. Kelley, D. R. Tilley, H.R. Weller and G.M. Hale |  Citation: Nucl. Physics A541, 1 (1992) |  Cutoff date: 8-OCT-1991 

 Full ENSDF file | Adopted Levels (PDF version) 


Q(β-)=-2.290×104 keV 22S(n)= 2.058×104 keV S(p)= 1.981×104 keV
Reference: 2012WA38

References:
  A  2H(d,n)  B  2H(d,p)
  C  2H(d,d)  D  3H(p,γ)
  E  3He(n,p)  F  4He(γ,X)
  G  4He(E,E’)  H  4He(n,n)
  I  4He(3He,3He)  J  4He(α,α), 4He(α,α’)
  K  4He(n,t)  L  4He(p,3He), 4He(p,P+D)

General Comments:

Ground state: due to non-central forces, the wave function for the Jπ=0+ ground state of 4He can be a positive-parity mixture of three 1s0, six 3p0, and five 5d0 orthogonal states (1967Be74). The symmetric s-wave component is the dominant part of the wavefunction, with significant d-wave and almost negligible p-wave contributions. Since the d-state admixture can be inferred from measurements such as the tensor analysing powers for 2H(d,γ)4He, it has been the subject of much experimental and theoretical attention since the previous compilation (1973Fi04), despite confusion stemming from the fact that in some cases the results refer to only part of the full d-state probability as calculated in 1988Ca19, 1990Ch06 and 1991Ar01.

Recent variational and Green Function Monte Carlo (gfmc) calculations (1988Ca19, 1991Ca35) using realistic nucleon-nucleon potentials have been highly succesful in reproducing the ground-state properties of light nuclei. These calculations for 4He give d-state probabilities ranging from 15-17.5%, depending on the potential model (including 3-body forces) used, and p-wave probabilities that are much smaller (approx. 1%). Other theoretical and experimental estimates of the d-state percentage are considerably lower, but these inferences can be complicated by the presence of more than one multipole and other d-state effects. See further discussion in 1992Ti02.

Excited states: the unbound excited-state level structure presented here is based on the comprehensive, Coulomb-corrected, charge-independent R-matrix analysis discussed in 1992Ti02. This analysis takes its isospin-1 parameters from an analysis of p-3He scattering data, but with eigenenergies shifted by the internal Coulomb energy difference ΔE(C)=-0.64 MeV and the p-3h and n-3He reduced-width amplitudes scaled by the isospin Clebsch-Gordon coefficient 0.7071. The isospin-0 parameters are then varied to fit the experimental data for the reactions among the two-body channels p+3H, n+3He and d+2H, at energies corresponding to excitations in 4He below approximately 29 MeV. In this fit, the t=0 nucleon-trinucleon reduced width amplitudes are constrained and a small amount of internal Coulomb isospin mixing is introduced (see 1992Ti02) to reproduce the differences between the two branches of the d+d reaction. The Breit-Wigner resonance parameters at channel radii a(p-t)=a(n-3He)=4.9 fm and a(d-d)=7.0 fm are given. See further discussion in 1992Ti02.

Estimated uncertainties on the resonance parameters given for 4He are as follows: at excitation energies below 26 MeV, the positions are uncertain by 20 keV or less, except for the (1-, t=0) level at 24.25 MeV, which is uncertain by 150 keV. At excitation energies between 26 and 30 MeV, the uncertainties in the positions are generally less than 90 keV, with that of the (1-, t=0) level at 28.37 MeV level less than 10 keV. The widths of the levels (partial and total) are generally known to about 10%. See further discussion in 1992Ti02.

Q-value: Note: Current evaluation has used the following Q record -22.90×103 2120577.62 119813.85 1 1997Au07






E(level)
(keV)
XREFJπ(level) T1/2(level)
      0.0             0+ STABLE
  20210    E GHI K  0+ 0.50 MeV
% p = 100
  21010       H     0- 0.84 MeV
% n = 24
% p = 76
  21840       H J   2- 2.01 MeV
% n = 37
% p = 63
  23330             2- 5.01 MeV
% n = 47
% p = 53
  23640             1- 6.20 MeV
% IT = ?
% n = 45
% p = 55
  24250AB           1- 6.10 MeV
% n = 47
% p = 50
% D = 3
  25280             0- 7.97 MeV
% n = 48
% p = 52
  25950   D         1- 12.66 MeV
% IT = ?
% n = 48
% p = 52
  27420  C     I  L 2+ 8.69 MeV
% n = 3
% p = 3
% D = 94
E(level)
(keV)
XREFJπ(level) T1/2(level)
  28310             1+ 9.89 MeV
% n = 47
% p = 48
% D = 5
  28370ABC     I    1- 3.92 MeV
% n = 2
% p = 2
% D = 96
  28390ABC          2- 8.75 MeV
% n = 0.2
% p = 0.2
% D = 99.6
  28640  C          0- 4.89 MeV
% D = 100
  28670  C  F       2+ 3.78 MeV
% IT = ?
% D = 100
  29890        I    2+ 9.72 MeV
% n = 0.4
% p = 0.4
% D = 99.2

E(level): Level energies from an R-matrix calculation

Back to top

Back to top

Additional Level Data and Comments:

E(level)Jπ(level)T1/2(level)Comments
  236401- 6.20 MeV
% IT = ?
% n = 45
% p = 55
T=1, Γp=3.44 MEV, Γn=2.76 MEV
Strength is primarily 3p1.
  242501- 6.10 MeV
% n = 47
% p = 50
% D = 3
T=0, Γp=3.08 MEV, Γn=2.87 MEV
Γp and Γn are primarily 3p1 and Γd=0.15 MeV.
  259501- 12.66 MeV
% IT = ?
% n = 48
% p = 52
T=1, Γp=6.52 MEV, Γn=6.14 MEV
Strength is primarily 1p1.
  274202+ 8.69 MeV
% n = 3
% p = 3
% D = 94
T=0, Γp=0.25 MEV, Γn=0.23 MEV
Γd=8.21 MeV and is primarily 5s2.
  283101+ 9.89 MeV
% n = 47
% p = 48
% D = 5
T=0, Γp=4.72 MEV, Γn=4.66 MEV
Γd=0.51 MeV.
  283701- 3.92 MeV
% n = 2
% p = 2
% D = 96
T=0, Γp=0.07 MEV, Γn=0.08 MEV
Γd=3.77 MeV.
  283902- 8.75 MeV
% n = 0.2
% p = 0.2
% D = 99.6
T=0, Γp=0.02 MEV, Γn=0.02 MEV
Γd=8.71 MeV.
  286400- 4.89 MeV
% D = 100
T=0
Γd=4.89 MeV.
  286702+ 3.78 MeV
% IT = ?
% D = 100
T=0
Γd=3.78 and is primarily 1d2.
  298902+ 9.72 MeV
% n = 0.4
% p = 0.4
% D = 99.2
T=0, Γp=0.04 MEV, Γn=0.04 MEV
Γd=9.64 and is primarily 5d2.

Back to top