ADOPTED LEVELS for 222Pa

Authors: Balraj Singh, M.S. Basunia, Jun Chen Et Al., |  Citation: Nucl. Data Sheets 192, 315 (2023) |  Cutoff date: 25-Sep-2023 

 Full ENSDF file | Adopted Levels (PDF version) 


Q(β-)=-221×101 keV 10S(n)= 638×101 keV 11S(p)= 2160 keV 90Q(α)= 8790 keV 60
Reference: 2021WA16

References:
  A  226Np α decay (44 MS) 

General Comments:

Production and identification of 222Pa:

1970Bo13: 209Bi(16O,3n), 206Pb(19F,3n), excitation function; parent of 218Ac from 9210α.

1979Sc09: 184W(40Ar,pn),E=165-202 MeV, excitation function; parent of 218Ac from 9210α; and parent of 214Fr from 8430α.

2019Mi08: 222Pa produced in 181Ta(48Ca,X),E=212,217,226 MeV fusion-evaporation reactions at the UNILAC accelerator of GSI, followed by separation of evaporation residues (ERs) using the SHIP velocity filter and implanted into the COMPAct Spectroscopy Set-up (COMPASS). Measured Eα and half-life of 222Pa decay from time correlations between ERs and α particles.

2021Hu18: 222Pa produced in 186W(40Ar,p3n),E=198.7 MeV. The evaporation residues (ERs) were separated in-flight by the gas-filled recoil separator SHANS and implanted in three 16-strip position-sensitive silicon detectors (PSSDs) at the IMP-Lanzhou facility. 222Pa identified by ERs-α-α-α time and position correlations. Measured Eα, Iα, and T1/2 of g.s. of 222Pa.

Theoretical calculations for α decay:

2023Za01: calculated T1/2 for α decay using the generalized liquid-drop model with a 1977 nuclear proximity potential.

2022He18: calculated α-decay T1/2, α-preformation factor using density-dependent cluster model with RMF NN interactions, M3Y NN interactions and universal decay law (UDL) formula.

2021Sa52: calculated Q(2α), T1/2 for 2α-decay with and without the deformation effects using the modified generalized liquid drop model, and Coulomb and proximity potential model with different preformation factors for double α decay.

2018De17: calculated α-decay preformation factors using cluster-formation model (CFM) and T1/2(α) using a 1977 proximity potential (Prox. 1977).

2017Se19: calculated difference between proton and neutron skin thicknesses, Q(α) using Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (HFB) method, based on the Skyrme-like effective interactions.

Q-value: Q(ε)=4860 90, S(2n)=14360 90, S(2p)=6260 90 (2021Wa16)





E(level)
(keV)
XREF T1/2(level)
    0A 3.8 ms 6 
% α = 100
  107 30 A  
  188 30 A  

Back to top

Back to top

Additional Level Data and Comments:

E(level)Jπ(level)T1/2(level)Comments
    0 3.8 ms 6 
% α = 100
Only the α decay has been observed for the decay of 222Pa. Theoretical partial T1/2=21.3 s for 222Pa ε decay (2019Mo01) gives %ε+%β+=0.02. Other: %ε+%β+≈4×10-4 from gross β- decay calculations (1973Ta30).

Back to top