ADOPTED LEVELS, GAMMAS for 192Re
Author: Coral M. Baglin | Citation: Nucl. Data Sheets 113, 1871 (2012) | Cutoff date: 15-Jun-2012
Full ENSDF file | Adopted Levels (PDF version)
| Q(β-)=4.30×103 keV 8 | S(n)= 5.31×103 keV 8 | S(p)= 7.70×103 keV 9 | Q(α)= -4.0×102 keV 11 | ||
| Reference: 2012WA38 |
| References: | |||
| A | 192Re IT decay (85 μs) | B | 192Re IT decay (61 S) |
| C | 9Be(208Pb,X) | ||
| E(level) (keV) | XREF | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | I(γ) | M(γ) | Final Levels | |
| 0.0 | ABC | 16 s 1 % β- = 100 | |||||
| 160.1 2 ? | A | 160.1 2 | 100 | (M1) | 0.0 | ||
| 160.1+X? | A | 85 µs 10 % IT = 100 | XS | 100 | 160.1 | ||
| 267 10 | B | 61 s +40-20 % IT = 100 | 267 10 | 100 | 0.0 | ||
E(level): From Eγ, except as noted.
| E(level) (keV) | T1/2(level) | E(γ) (keV) | Multipolarity | Conversion Coefficient | Additional Data |
| 160.1 | 160.1 2 | (M1) | 1.353 | α=1.353 |
Additional Level Data and Comments:
| E(level) | Jπ(level) | T1/2(level) | Comments |
| E(level) | E(gamma) | Comments |
| 160.1+X | X | E(γ): x |<50 keV; see comment on level energy. M(γ): possibly E1 (2005Ca02). I(x, 192Re) too low for transition to be M2 (2011St21). |
| 267 | 267 | E(γ): from level-energy difference; γ to g.s. reported in 192Re IT decay (61 s), but Eγ unstated by authors. |
Identification: excitation functions for neutrons on 192Os, observation of known 192Os transitions in (n,p) product (1979KaYT). Also produced in fragmentation of 1 GeV/nucleon 208Pb by a 9Be target (2012Al05, 2011St21, 2008StZY, 2005Ca02, 2001Ca13) and fragmentation of 950 MeV/nucleon 197Au by a Be target (1999Be63).
Levels: The presence of a long-lived, low-energy isomer could arise from a spin trap resulting from the proximity of states formed from parallel and antiparallel coupling of high |W orbitals. Calculations indicate a possible Kπ=8+ ν11/2[615]+π5/2[402] g.s. with a Kπ=3+ ν11/2[615]-π5/2[402] state near 250 keV; alternatively, the g.s. could be Kπ=2- ν9/2[505]-π5/2[402] with various high-J states nearby arising from coupling a 9/2[505], 3/2[512] or 11/2[615] proton with a 5/2[402] or 9/2[514] neutron (2012ReZZ). Another possibility is the coexistence of oblate and prolate shapes; total Routhian surface calculations predict a γ-soft prolate-centered g.s. with a possible oblate state nearby created by the addition of a small amount of collective angular momentum (2012ReZZ).
Levels: For cranked Woods-Saxon-Stutinsky calculation of shape of Re, see 2006Wa31; oblate rotation predicted to coexist with high-K prolate rotation in 192Re.
Q-value: Note: Current evaluation has used the following Q record 4.11×103 SY5.49×103 SY7950 syst -5.3×102 syst 2003Au03,2011AuZZ
Q-value: ΔQ(β)=200, ΔS(n)=200, ΔS(p)=280, ΔQ(α)=280 (2003Au03).