Author: Balraj Singh |  Citation: ENSDF |  Cutoff date: 28-FEB-2018 

Authors: Yu. Khazov, A.A. Rodionov and S. Sakharov, Balraj Singh |  Citation: Nucl. Data Sheets 104, 497 (2005) |  Cutoff date: 10-Feb-2005 

 Full ENSDF file | Adopted Levels (PDF version) 

Q(β-)=12150 keV SYS(n)= 3120 keV SYS(p)= 17170 keV SYQ(α)= -8200 keV SY
Reference: 2017WA10

  A  9Be(134Sn,X) 

General Comments:

2000Ha55 (also 2001Ha39): 132Cd produced and identified using 238U(p,F) E=1 GeV (target=uranium carbide/graphite) reaction followed by LASER ionization and mass separation at CERN/ISOLDE facility. Measured β and β-delayed neutron spectra. Deduced levels in 132In. No γ rays were reported

2015Lo04: 132Cd nuclide produced at RIBF-RIKEN facility in 9Be(238U,F) reaction at E=345 MeV/nucleon with an average intensity of 6×1010 ions/s. Identification of 132Cd was made by determining atomic Z and mass-to-charge ratio α/Q, where Q=charge state of the ions. The selectivity of ions was based on magnetic rigidity, time-of-flight and energy loss. The separated nuclei were implanted at a rate of 50 ions/s in a stack of eight double-sided silicon-strip detectors (WAS3ABi), surrounded by EURICA array of 84 HPGe detectors. Correlations were recorded between the implanted ions and β rays. The half-life of 132Cd isotope was measured from the correlated ion-β decay curves and maximum likelihood analysis technique as described in 2014Xu07. Comparison of measured half-lives with FRDM+QRPA, KTUY+GT2 and DF3+CQRPA theoretical calculations

Theoretical nuclear structure calculations for 132Cd: consult Nuclear Science References (NSR) database at for eight articles.

Q-value: Estimated uncertainties (2017Wa10): ΔQ(β-)=210, ΔS(n)=220, ΔS(p)=540, ΔQ(α)=540.

Q-value: S(2n)=5290 200, Q(β-n)=9690 200 (syst,2017Wa10). Q(β-2n)=3480 200 (syst, deduced by evaluator from masses in 2017Wa10). S(2p)=32050 (theory,1997Mo25)

XREFJπ(level) T1/2(level)E(γ)
    0A 0+ 84 ms 5 
% β- = 100
% β-n = 60 15
% β-2n = ?
  618 8 A (2+)     618 8 

Back to top

Back to top

Additional Level Data and Comments:

    00+ 84 ms 5 
% β- = 100
% β-n = 60 15
% β-2n = ?
Probable configuration=νf7/22~#πg9/2-2 (2000Ha55).
  618(2+)   Proposed (2016Wa28) configuration=mixture of π-2~#ν2 excitations around the robust 132Sn core.

Back to top

Additional Gamma Comments:

  618  618E(γ): uncertainty includes statistical and systematic

Back to top