NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of May 3, 2024. Search: Author = J.H.Cheng Found 12 matches. 2024CH08 Phys.Lett. B 848, 138322 (2024) J.-H.Cheng, W.-Y.Zhang, Q.Xiao, J.-G.Deng, T.-P.Yu Determinants in laser-assisted deformed α decay NUCLEAR STRUCTURE A=100-300; analyzed available data; deduced degree of agreement between theoretical T1/2 and experimental data, rate of the change of penetration probability and the rate of the change of α decay half-life for different parent nuclei have different sensitivity to the high-intensity laser, rate of the relative change of penetration probability versus the Coulomb-Sommerfeld parameter.
doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138322
2024ZO01 J.Phys.(London) G51, 045103 (2024) Y.-T.Zou, J.-H.Cheng, Y.-Y.Xu, Q.Xiao, S.-M.Liu, F.-Q.Shao, T.-P.Yu Laser-assisted two-proton radioactivity RADIOACTIVITY 6Be, 12O, 16Ne, 19Mg, 45Fe, 48Ni, 54Zn, 67Kr(2p); calculated the two-proton radioactivity assisted by an ultra-intense laser field within a deformed one-parameter model (OPM); deduced the lasers characterized by shorter wavelengths and higher intensities exert a more significant influence on the rate of the average change in pulse duration, T1/2.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ad2691
2023XI06 J.Phys.(London) G50, 085102 (2023) Q.Xiao, J.-H.Cheng, B.-L.Wang, Y.-Y.Xu, Y.-T.Zou, T.-P.Yu Half-lives for proton emission and α decay within the deformed Gamow-like model RADIOACTIVITY 109I, 112,113Cs, 117La, 121Pr, 131Eu, 135Tb, 140,141Ho, 144,145,146,147Tm, 150,151Lu, 155,156,157Ta, 159,160,161Re, 164,165,166,167Ir, 170,171Au, 176,177Tl, 185Bi, 111Cs, 127Pm, 137Tb(p), 106,108Te, 108,110,112Xe, 114Ba, 144Nd, 146,148Sm, 148,150,152Gd, 150,152,154Dy, 152,154,156Er, 154,156Yb, 156,158,160,162Hf, 174Hf, 158,160,162,164,166,168W, 180W, 162,164,166,168,170,172,174Os, 186Os, 168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190Pt, 170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188Hg, 178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194Pb, 210Pb, 186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218Po, 194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222Rn, 202,204,206,208,210Ra, 214,216,218,220,222,224,226Ra, 210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232Th, 216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238U, 228,230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244Pu, 234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248Cm, 238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254Cf, 246,248,250,252,254,256Fm, 252,254,256No, 256,258Rf, 266,268,270Hs, 270Ds, 282Ds, 286Cn, 286,288,290Fl, 290,292Lv, 294Og, 105Te, 109Te, 109Xe, 147Sm, 149,151Gd, 151,153Dy, 153,155Er, 155Yb, 157,159Hf, 161,163W, 167W, 161Os, 167,169,171,173Os, 171,173,175,177,179,181,183,185Pt, 175,177,179,181,183,185Hg, 183,185,187,189Pb, 187,189,191,193,195,197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211,213,215,217,219Po, 193,195,197,199Rn, 203,205,207,209,211,213,215,217,219,221Rn, 201,203,205,207,209,211,213,215,217,219,221,223Ra, 211,213,215,217,219,221,223,225,227Th, 221,223,225,227,229,231,233,235U, 229,231,233,235,237,239,241Pu, 233Cm, 239,241,243,245,247Cm, 237Cf, 245,247,249,251,253Cf, 249,251,253,255,257Fm, 255,257,259No, 257Rf, 261Rf, 261Sg, 265Hs, 109I, 113I, 145Pm, 147Eu, 151Tb, 151,153Ho, 155,157Tm, 155Lu, 157,159Ta, 163,165Re, 167,169,171,173,175,177Ir, 173,175,177,179,181,183,185Au, 177,179,181Tl, 187,189,191,193,195Bi, 193,195,197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211,213,215,217,219,221,223,225,227Ac, 211,213,215,217,219,221,223,225,227,229,231Pa, 219Np, 223,225,227,229,231,233,235,237Np, 229Am, 235Am, 239,241,243Am, 243,245,247,249Bk, 247Es, 251,253Es, 249,251Md, 255,257Md, 253,255Lr, 259Lr, 259Db, 261Bh, 110,112I, 114Cs, 152,154Ho, 154,156Tm, 158Lu, 158Ta, 162Ta, 160,162Re, 168Re, 166,168Ir, 172,174Ir, 170Au, 176Au, 180Tl, 186Bi, 192,194Bi, 212,214Bi, 192At, 200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218At, 200Fr, 204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220Fr, 216,218,220,222,224,226Ac, 212Pa, 224Pa, 228,230Pa, 236Np, 236Am, 244Bk, 248Es, 258Md, 272Rg(α); calculated T1/2 with the deformed Gamow-like model, which introduces the effects of nucleus deformation; deduced the deformed model follows the Geiger-Nuttall law. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/acdfeb
2022CH08 Phys.Rev. C 105, 024312 (2022) Systematic study of laser-assisted proton radioactivity from deformed nuclei RADIOACTIVITY 108,109I, 112,113Cs, 117La, 121Pr, 131Eu, 135Tb, 141Ho, 144,145,146,147Tm, 150,151Lu, 155,156,157Ta, 159,160,161Re, 164,165,166,167Ir, 170,171Au, 176,177Tl, 185Bi(p); calculated T1/2 under the influence of ultra-intense laser fields, dependence of emitted proton energy on the proton radioactivity penetration probability. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.024312
2022CH48 Chin.Phys.C 46, 104104 (2022) J.-H.Cheng, Z.Zhang, X.-J.Wu, P.-C.Chu, X.-H.Li Systematic study of proton radioactivity half-lives based on the relationship between Skyrme-Hartree-Fock and the macroscopic quantities of nuclear matter RADIOACTIVITY 144,145,146,147Tm, 150,151Lu, 156,157Ta, 159,160,161Re, 164,165,166,167Ir, 170,171Au, 176,177Tl(p); calculated the spherical proton radioactivity using the relationship between Skyrme parameters and the macroscopic quantities of nuclear matter. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac7a99
2022SH47 Eur.Phys.J. A 58, 249 (2022) R.Sha, J.-H.Cheng, D.-A.Li, Y.-S.Huang, J.Zhao, Y.-T.Hu, D.-Z.Zhang, Y.-B.Wu, T.-P.Yu Dense short muon source based on laser-ion accelerators
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00900-w
2020CH12 Nucl.Phys. A997, 121717(2020) J.-Ha.Cheng, J.-L.Chen, J.-G.Deng, X.-H.Li, Z.Zhang, P.-C.Chu Systematic study of proton emission half-lives within the two-potential approach with Skyrme-Hartree-Fock
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121717
2020CH43 Eur.Phys.J. A 56, 273 (2020) J.-H.Cheng, X.Pan, Y.-T.Zou, X.-H.Li, Z.Zhang, P.-C.Chu Systematic study of proton radioactivity of spherical proton emitters with Skyrme interactions RADIOACTIVITY 144,145,146,147Tm, 150,151Lu, 155,156,157Ta, 159,160,161Re, 164,165,166,167Ir, 170,171Au, 176,177Tl(p); calculated T1/2. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00280-z
2019CH27 Nucl.Phys. A987, 350 (2019) J.-H.Cheng, J.-L.Chen, J.G.Deng, X.-J.Wu, X.-H.Li, P.-C.Chu Systematic study of α decay half-lives based on Gamow-like model with a screened electrostatic barrier RADIOACTIVITY Z>51(α); calculated even-even nuclei T1/2 using modified Gamow-like model including centrifugal potential and electrostatic shielding with two parameters, radius constant r0 and a parameter for the screened electrostatic potential; Z=120; calculated T1/2 for 7 even-even nuclei and for some of their not yet synthesized α-decay chain. Halflives compared with those calculated using different approaches and with available data.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.05.002
2019CH41 J.Phys.(London) G46, 065107 (2019) J.-L.Chen, X.-H.Li, J.-H.Cheng, J.-G.Deng, X.-J.Wu Systematic study of proton radioactivity based on Gamow-like model with a screened electrostatic barrier RADIOACTIVITY 105Sb, 109I, 112,113Cs, 121Pr, 130,131Eu, 135Tb, 140,141Ho, 145,146,147Tm, 150,151Lu, 155,156,157Ta, 159,160,161Re, 164,165,166,167Ir, 170,171Au, 176,177Tl, 185Bi(p); calculated T1/2. Comparison with experimental data.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6471/ab1a56
2019DE17 Eur.Phys.J. A 55, 58 (2019) J.-G.Deng, X.-H.Li, J.L.Chen, J.-H.Cheng, X.-J.Wu Systematic study of proton radioactivity of spherical proton emitters within various versions of proximity potential formalisms RADIOACTIVITY 145,146,147Tm, 150,151Lu, 155,156,157Ta, 160,161Re, 165,166,167Ir, 170,171Au, 176,177Tl, 185Bi(p); calculated proton radioactivity T1/2; compared with published calculations using different proximity potentials and with data.
doi: 10.1140/epja/i2019-12728-0
2017DE37 Chin.Phys.C 41, 124109 (2017) J.-G.Deng, J.-H.Cheng, B.Zheng, X.-H.Li α decay properties of 297Og within the two-potential approach RADIOACTIVITY 251,253,255Cf, 253,255Es, 253,257Fm, 255,257,259Md, 255,259No, 257,259Lr, 257,259,261,263Rf, 259Db, 259,261,263,265,271Sg, 261,271Bh, 265,267,269,273,275Hs, 275Mt, 267,269,271,273,277,279,281Ds, 279Rg, 277,281,285Cn, 283,285Nh, 285,287,289Fl, 287,289Mc, 291,293Lv, 293Ts, 293,295,297Og(α); calculated T1/2, transitions J, π, preformation probabilities. Comparison with available data.
doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/41/12/124109
Back to query form |