NSR Query Results


Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of May 22, 2024.

Search: Author = H.M.Liu

Found 15 matches.

Back to query form



2024ZH20      Chin.Phys.C 48, 044102 (2024)

D.-M.Zhang, X.-Y.Hu, L.-J.Qi, H.-M.Liu, M.Li, X.-H.Li

Theoretical calculations of proton emission half-lives based on a deformed Gamow-like model

RADIOACTIVITY 108,109I, 112,113Cs, 117La, 121Pr, 135Tb, 141Ho(p); calculated proton emission T1/2 with deformed Gamow-like model, where the deformation effect was included in the Coulomb potential. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad243d
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2022LI46      Phys.Rev. C 106, 025801 (2022)

H.-M.Liu, J.Zhang, Z.-H.Li, J.-B.Wei, G.F.Burgio, H.-J.Schulze

Microscopic nuclear equation of state at finite temperature and stellar stability

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.106.025801
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2022XU04      Eur.Phys.J. A 58, 16 (2022)

Y.-Y.Xu, H.-M.Liu, D.-X.Zhu, X.Pan, Y.-T.Zou, X.-H.Li, P.-C.Chu

An improved formula for the favored α decay half-lives

RADIOACTIVITY 146,148Sm, 148,150,152Gd, 150,152,154Dy, 152,154,156Er, 154,156Yb, 156,158,160,162Hf, 174Hf, 158,160,162,164,166,168W, 180W, 162,164,166,168,170,172,174Os, 186Os, 166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190Pt, 170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188Hg, 178,180,182,184,186,188,190,192,194Pb, 210Pb, 186,188,190,192,194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218Po, 194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222Rn, 202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226Ra, 208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232Th, 218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238U, 230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244Pu, 234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248Cm, 238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254Cf, 244,246Fm, 252,254,256No, 256,258Rf, 260Sg, 266,268,270Hs, 270Ds, 282Ds, 286Cn, 286,288Fl, 290,292Lv, 294Og, 105,107,109Te, 113I, 109,111Xe, 145Pm, 147Sm, 147Eu, 149,151Gd, 151,153Dy, 151,153Ho, 153,155Er, 153,155,157Tm, 155Yb, 155,157Lu, 157,159,161Hf, 157,159,161Ta, 159,161,163,165,167W, 159,161,163,165Re, 161,163,165,167,169,171,173Os, 165,167,169,171,173Ir, 177Ir, 165,167,169,171,173Pt, 177Pt, 181,183,185Pt, 171,173,175,177,179,181,183,185Au, 173,175Hg, 179Hg, 183Hg, 185Hg, 177,179,181Tl, 185,187,189,191Pb, 185,187,189,191,193,195,197Bi, 191,193,195,197,199,201Po, 205,207,209Po, 213,215,217,219Po, 187Po, 191,193,195,197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211,213,215,217,219At, 195,197,199,201,203,205,207,209Rn, 215,217Rn, 197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211,213,215,217,219Fr, 201,203,205Ra, 209,211Ra, 217Ra, 207,209,211,213,215,217,219,221Ac, 227Ac, 209,211,213Th, 219Th, 211,213,215,217,219,221,223,225,227,229,231Pa, 221U, 229U, 233U, 219Np, 223,225Np, 233Np, 231Pu, 235Pu, 239Pu, 233Cm, 239,241Cf, 245Cf, 253Cf, 241,243,245,247Es, 251,253,255Es, 241Fm, 247Fm, 251No, 253,255Lr, 259Lr, 261Rf, 257Db, 263Sg, 263,265Hs, 267Ds, 148Eu, 152,154Ho, 154,156Tm, 156,158Lu, 158Ta, 162,164Re, 164,166,168,170,172Ir, 170,172,174,176,178Au, 184Au, 188Bi, 196Bi, 192,194,196,198,200,202At, 214,216At, 256,258,260Rf, 260Sg, 262,264Hs, 268,270,272Hs, 266Ds, 270Ds, 276,278Ds, 270Cn, 280,282Cn, 284,286,288Fl, 288,290,292,294,296Lv, 294,296,298,300,302,304Og, 296,298,300,302,304,306,308120, 302,304,306,308,310,312122, 308,310,312,314,316,318124, 314,316,318,320,322,324,326126, 320,322,324,326,328,330,332128(α); calculated T1/2 using the modified Hatsukawa formula. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00666-1
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2022ZH39      Chin.Phys.C 46, 044106 (2022)

D.-X.Zhu, H.-M.Liu, Y.-Y.Xu, Y.-T.Zou, X.-J.Wu, P.-C.Chu, X.-H.Li

Two-proton radioactivity within Coulomb and proximity potential model

RADIOACTIVITY 19Mg, 45Fe, 48Ni, 54Zn, 67Kr(2p); calculated T1/2 using the Coulomb and proximity potential model (CPPM). Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac45ef
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2021LI16      Chin.Phys.C 45, 024108 (2021)

H.-M.Liu, Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, J.-L.Chen, B.He, X.-H.Li

New Geiger-Nuttall law for two-proton radioactivity

RADIOACTIVITY 6Be, 12O, 16Ne, 19Mg, 45Fe, 48Ni, 54Zn, 67Kr, 22Si, 26S, 34Ca, 36Sc, 38,39Ti, 40V, 42Cr, 47Co, 49Ni, 56Ga, 58,59,60Ge, 61As, 10N, 28Cl, 32K, 57Ga, 62As, 52Cu, 60As(2p); calculated T1/2 using GLDM, ELDM, the four-parameter empirical formula. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/abd01e
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2021LI45      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E30, 2150074 (2021)

H.-M.Liu, Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, B.He, X.-H.Li

Systematic study of two-proton radioactivity half-lives based on a modified Gamow-like model

RADIOACTIVITY 19Mg, 45Fe, 48Ni, 54Zn, 67Kr, 22Si, 26S, 34Ca, 36Sc, 38,39Ti, 40V, 42Cr, 47Co, 49Ni, 58Ga, 58,59Ge, 61As, 10N, 28Cl, 32K, 57Ga, 62As, 52Cu, 60As(2p); calculated T1/2; deduced T1/2 and Q-values reaction. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1142/S0218301321500749
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2021LI67      Phys.Scr. 96, 12522 (2021)

H.-M.Liu, Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, X.-H.Li, X.-J.Wu, B.He

Systematic study of cluster radioactivity half-lives based on a modified Gamow-like model

RADIOACTIVITY 222,224,226Ra(14C), 230,232,234U(24Ne), 234,236U, 236,238Pu(28Mg), 221Fr, 221,223Ra, 225Ac(14C), 231Pa, 233,235U(24Ne), 233,235U(25Ne); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ac3dbc
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2021ZO01      Chin.Phys.C 45, 104101 (2021)

Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, X.-H.Li, H.-M.Liu, X.-J.Wu, B.He

Systematic study of two-proton radioactivity with a screened electrostatic barrier

RADIOACTIVITY 6Be, 12O, 16Ne, 19Mg, 45Fe, 48Ni, 54Zn, 67Kr(2p); analyzed available data; calculated T1/2 using five different theoretical models and/or formulas.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ac1b96
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2021ZO02      Phys.Scr. 96, 075301 (2021)

Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, H.-M.Liu, X.-J.Wu, B.He, X.-H.Li

Systematic studies on a decay half-lives of neptunium isotopes

RADIOACTIVITY 219,223,224,225,233,221,222,229,231,235,237,239,220,226,227,228,232,236Np(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/abf795
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2020LI27      Chin.Phys.C 44, 094106 (2020)

H.-M.Liu, Y.-T.Zou, X.Pan, X.-J.Bao, X.-H.Li

Systematic study of the α decay preformation factors of the nuclei around the Z = 82, N = 126 shell closures within the generalized liquid drop model

RADIOACTIVITY 186,188,190,192,194Po, 196,198,200,202,204,206,208Po, 200,202,204,206,208,210,212Rn, 204Ra, 208Ra, 212Th, 214Th, 216U, 178,180Pb, 184,186,188,190,192,194Pb, 210Pb, 212,214,216,218Po, 214,216,218,220Rn, 216Ra, 218Ra, 216,218,220Th, 218U, 195,197,199,201,203,205,207Po, 197,199,201,203,205,207,209,211At, 195,197Rn, 203Rn, 207,209Rn, 199,201,203,205,207,209,211,213Fr, 203Ra, 209Ra, 205,207Ac, 211Ac, 213,215Pa, 177,179Tl, 213,215Po, 219Po, 213,215,217,219At, 215,217Rn, 215,217,219Fr, 217Ra, 215,217Ac, 219Th, 219Pa, 221Pa, 221U, 209Bi, 189Po, 203Po, 205,207,209,211,213Ra, 215Th, 187,189Pb, 213Bi, 213Rn, 219,221Rn, 215Ra, 219Ra, 217Th, 192At, 200,202,204,206,208At, 200Fr, 204,206,208Fr, 206Ac, 214,216,218At, 216,218Fr, 218Ac, 220Pa, 186Bi, 190,192,194Bi, 210At, 210,212Fr, 212Pa, 210,212,214Bi, 212At, 214Fr, 216Ac(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/44/9/094106
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2019LI58      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E28, 1950089 (2019)

H.-M.Liu, J.-Y.Xu, J.-G.Deng, B.He, X.-H.Li

Predictions of α decay half-lives for even-even superheavy nuclei with 104≤ Z ≤ 128 based on two-potential approach within cluster-formation model

RADIOACTIVITY 144Nd, 146,148Sm, 148,150,152Gd, 150,152,154Dy, 152,154,156Er, 154,156,158Yb, 156,158,160,162,164,166,168,170,172,174Hf, 158,160,162,164,166,168W, 180W, 162,164,166,168,170,172,174Os, 186Os, 166,168,170,172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188,190Pt, 172,174,176,178,180,182,184,186,188Hg, 180Pb, 184,186,188,190,192,194Pb, 210Pb, 190Po, 194,196,198,200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218Po, 194,196Rn, 200,202,204,206,208,210,212,214,216,218,220,222Rn, 202,204Ra, 208Ra, 214,216,218,220,222,224,226Ra, 212,214,216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232Th, 216,218,220,222,224,226,228,230,232,234,236,238U, 228,230,232,234,236,238,240,242,244Pu, 234,236,238,240,242,244,246,248,250Cm, 238,240,242,244,246,248,250,252,254,256Cf, 244Fm, 248Fm, 252,254,256Fm, 254,256,258No, 256,258,260Rf, 260Sg, 264Hs, 268,270Hs, 270Ds, 286,288Fl, 290,292Lv, 294Og(α); calculated T1/2. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1142/S0218301319500897
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2009LI33      Nucl.Technology 168, 354 (2009)

Y.-H.Liu, C.-K.Huang, P.-E.Tsai, A.-Y.Chen, H.-M.Liu, S.-C.Lee, S.-H.Jiang

BNCT Epithermal Neutron Beam Mapping by Using Indirect Neutron Radiography

doi: 10.13182/NT09-A9208
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2006HS01      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 64, 306 (2006)

C.H.Hsieh, H.M.Liu, J.J.Hwang, H.E.Wang, J.J.Kai, F.D.Chen

A simple model for quantification of the radiobiological effectiveness of the 10B(n, α)7Li capture reaction in BNCT

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.08.018
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2001CH94      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 55, 549 (2001)

J.-H.Chao, P.-C.Hsu, H.-M.Liu

Measurement of high dose rates by photon activation of indium foils

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 113,115In(γ, γ'), E=spectrum; measured isomer activation yields; deduced effective σ. Cobalt source, application to dose rate measurement discussed.

doi: 10.1016/S0969-8043(01)00076-8
Citations: PlumX Metrics


1995SA19      J.Phys.(London) G21, 241 (1995)

B.-H.Sa, H.-M.Liu, Y.-M.Zheng, Z.-D.Lu, X.-Z.Zhang

Correlations between Conditional Moments Might not Necessarily Imply Evidence of a Phase Transition in a Diassembly of Hot Nuclei

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 197Au; calculated disassembly fragment charge distribution; deduced conditional moments correlations related features. Monte Carlo, partition method approaches.

doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/21/2/011
Citations: PlumX Metrics


Back to query form