Abstract
The \(\alpha \)-decay half-lives for \(^{186-218}\mathrm {Po}\) isotopes have been computed using Gamow-like model (GLM), Coulomb and proximity potential model (CPPM) including temperature-dependent proximity potential. The half-lives were evaluated using both experimentally and theoretically calculated Q-values. The computed \(\alpha \)-decay half-lives are compared with experimental and empirical formulas such as Royer, universal decay law and the new Ren B formula. The standard deviations are evaluated and the results indicate that the GLM gives the best results for even–even nuclei, while the temperature-dependent CPPM gives the overall least deviation from experimental values. Among the empirical formulas, the Royer formula is the most suitable for the evaluation of \(\alpha \)-decay half-lives for the Po isotopes considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J H Cheng, J L Chen, J G Deng, X J Wu, X H Li and P C Chu, Nucl. Phys. A 987, 350 (2019)
N A M Alsaif, S Radiman and S M S Ahmed, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 26, 1750008 (2017)
K P Santhosh, D T. Akrawy, H Hassanabadi, A H Ahmed and T A Jose, Phys. Rev. C 101, 064610 (2020)
K P Santhosh, S Sahadevan and R K Biju, Nucl. Phys. A 825, 159 (2009)
K P Santhosh, S Sahadevan, B Priyanka and M S Unnikrishnan, Nucl. Phys. A 882, 49 (2012)
V Zanganah, D T Akrawy, H Hassanabadi, S Hossei and S Thakur, Nucl. Phys. A 997, 121714 (2020)
W A Yahya, J. Niger. Soc. Phys. Sci. 2, 250 (2020)
Y J Wang, H F Zhang, W Zuo and J Q Li, Chin. Phys. Lett. 27, 062103 (2010)
G Royer and R Moustabchir, Nucl. Phys. A 683, 182 (2001)
B Xiaojun, H Zhang, H Zhang, G Royer and J Li, Nucl. Phys. A 921, 85 (2014)
G Royer and H F. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 77, 037602 (2008)
S Zhang, J P Cui, Y L Zhang and Y Z Wang, Phys. Rev. C 97, 014316 (2018)
K P Santhosh, C Nithya, H Hassanabadi and D T Akrawy, Phys. Rev. C 98, 024625 (2018)
K P Santhosh and T A Jose, Nucl. Phys. A 992, 121626 (2019)
R K Gupta and W Greiner, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 3, 335 (1994)
B B Singh, S K Patra and R K Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 82, 014607 (2010)
A Zdeb, M Warda and K Pomorski, Phys. Rev. C 87, 024308 (2013)
G Royer, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 26, 1149 (2000)
C Qi, F R Xu, R J Liotta, R Wyss, M Y Zhang, C Asawatangtrakuldee and D Hu, Phys. Rev. C 80, 044326 (2009)
C Qi, F R Xu, R J Liotta and R Wyss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 072501 (2009)
Z Ren, C Xu and Z Wang, Phys. Rev. C 70, 034304 (2004)
D T Akrawya, H Hassanabadi, Y Qian and K P Santhosh, Nucl. Phys. A 983, 310 (2019)
H Hassanabadi and E Javadimanesh, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 22, 1350080 (2013)
K P Santhosh and I Sukumaran, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 246 (2017)
S S Hosseini, H Hassanabadi, D T Akrawy and S Zarrinkamar, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 28, 1950043 (2019)
K Santhosh, I Sukumaran and B Priyanka, Nucl. Phys. A 935, 28 (2015)
Y Shi and W Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. A 438, 450 (1985)
S Malik and R Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 39, 1992 (1989)
R Gharaei and V Zanganeh, Nucl. Phys. A 952, 28 (2016)
L Zheng, G L Zhang, J C Yang and W W Qu, Nucl. Phys. A 915, 70 (2013)
S A Gurvitz and G Kalbermann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 262 (1987)
M V Berry and K E Mount, Rep. Prog. Phys. 35, 315 (1972)
F Ghorbani, S Alavi and V Dehghani, Nucl. Phys. A 1002, 121947 (2020)
G Royer, Nucl. Phys. A 848, 279 (2010)
G Royer, C Schreiber and H Saulnier, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 20, 1030 (2011)
C Qi, D Delion, R Liotta and R Wyss, Phys. Rev. C 92, 014602 (2015)
V Denisov, O Davidovskaya and I Sedykh, Phys. Rev. C 85, 011303 (2012)
G Audi, F G Kondev, M Wang, W Huang and S Naimi, Chin. Phys. C 41, 030001 (2017)
M Wang, G Audi, F G Kondev, W Huang, S Naimi and X Xu, Chin. Phys. C 41, 030003 (2017)
W J Huang, G Audi, M Wang, F G Kondev, S Naimi and X Xu, Chin. Phys. C 41, 030002 (2017)
N Wang, M Liu, X Wu and J Meng, Phys. Lett. B 734, 215 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yahya, W.A. Theoretical study of the \(\alpha \)-decay half-lives of \(^{186-224} \mathrm {Po}\) isotopes. Pramana - J Phys 96, 46 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-022-02299-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-022-02299-x