β decay of Ba141

Javier Rufino, Jr., E. A. McCutchan, S. Zhu, A. A. Sonzogni, M. Alcorta, P. F. Bertone, M. P. Carpenter, J. Clark, C. R. Hoffman, R. V. F. Janssens, F. G. Kondev, T. Lauritsen, C. J. Lister, R. Pardo, A. Rogers, G. Savard, D. Seweryniak, and R. Vondrasek
Phys. Rev. C 106, 034318 – Published 22 September 2022
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

The β-decay strength function of nuclides produced in fission is important as it dictates the distribution of decay energy between electrons, neutrinos, and γ rays and so is critical for calculating decay heat in reactors and for estimating the reactor antineutrino spectrum. Several experimental techniques are available to determine this strength function, including electron spectroscopy, γ-ray calorimetry (TAGS spectroscopy), and detailed, high-resolution spectroscopy with modern large high-purity germanium arrays. This work investigates the decay of the well-known and strongly produced fission fragment Ba141. A beam of Cs141 was implanted at the target position of the Gammasphere and the subsequent decay of the daughter Ba141 was studied. Extensive decay spectroscopy was possible up to the decay Q value of 3.197(7) MeV, including a significant extension of the level scheme and detailed angular correlation measurements for all levels with greater than 0.25%β feeding. The distribution of the β-decay strength was then inferred and compared to previous calorimetric studies. The agreement was excellent and provides a benchmark for comparing strength function methods and data for a more detailed understanding of the structure of La141.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 22 August 2021
  • Revised 19 July 2022
  • Accepted 1 September 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.034318

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Javier Rufino, Jr.1,2, E. A. McCutchan2, S. Zhu2,3, A. A. Sonzogni2, M. Alcorta3, P. F. Bertone3, M. P. Carpenter3, J. Clark3, C. R. Hoffman3, R. V. F. Janssens4,5, F. G. Kondev3, T. Lauritsen3, C. J. Lister3, R. Pardo3, A. Rogers3, G. Savard3, D. Seweryniak3, and R. Vondrasek3

  • 1Physics and Astronomy, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA
  • 2National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973-5000, USA
  • 3Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
  • 5Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 106, Iss. 3 — September 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×