Skip to main content
Log in

Theoretical studies on the \(\alpha \) decay half-lives of hyper and normal isotopes of Po

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The \(\alpha \) decay half-lives of hyper and normal isotopes of Po nuclei are studied in the present work. The inclusion of \(\Lambda \)N interaction changes the half-life for \(\alpha \) decay. The theoretical predictions on the \(\alpha \) decay half-lives of normal Po isotopes are compared with experimental results and are seen to be matching well with each other. The neutron shell closure at \(N = 126\) is found to be the same for both normal and hypernuclei. The Geiger–Nuttal (G–N) law for \(\alpha \) decay is unaltered in the case of hypernuclei. The hypernuclei will decay into normal nuclei by mesonic or non-mesonic decay modes. Since the half-lives of normal Po nuclei are well within the experimental limits, our theoretical results suggest experimental verification of the \(\alpha \) emission from hyper Po nuclei in a cascade process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M Danysz, and J Pniewski, Philos. Mag44, 348 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H Bandō, T Motoba and J Žofka, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5, 4021 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. P H Pile, S Bart, R E Chrien, D J Millener, R J Sutter, N Tsoupas, J-C Peng, C S Mishra, E V Hungerford, T Kishimoto, L-G Tang, W von Witsch, Z Xu, K Maeda, D Gill, R McCrady, B Quinn, J Seydoux, J W Sleight, R L Stearns, H Plendl, A Rafatian and J Reidy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2585 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. T Hasegawa, O Hashimoto, S Homma, T Miyachi, T Nagae, M Sekimoto, T Shibata, H Sakaguchi, T Takahashi, K Aoki, H Noumi, H Bhang, M Youn, Y Gavrilov, S Ajimura, T Kishimoto, A Ohkusu, K Maeda, R Sawafta and R P Redwine, Phys. Rev. C 53, 1210 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. B Povh, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci28, 1 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R E Chrien and C B Dover, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 39, 113 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. E Botta, T Bressani and G Garbarino, Eur. Phys. J. A 48, 41 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A Gal, E V Hungerford and D J Millener, Rev. Mod. Phys88, 035004 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. J Hu, Z Zhang, S Bao and H Shen, Phys. Rev. C 94, 054325 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. T Motoba, H Bandō and K Ikeda, Prog. Theor. Phys. 70, 189 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. K Hagino and T Koike, Phys. Rev. C 84, 064325 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. E Hiyama, M Kamimura, Y Yamamoto, T Motoba and T A Rijken, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 185, 106 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. F Minato, S Chiba and K Hagino, Nucl. Phys. A 831, 150 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. F Minato and S Chiba, Nucl. Phys. A 856, 55 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. M T Win, K Hagino and T Koike, Phys. Rev. C 83, 014301 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J M Yao, Z P Li, K Hagino, M T Win, Y Zhang and J Meng, Nucl. Phys. A 868, 12 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. R H Dalitz, R C Herndon and Y C Tang, Nucl. Phys. A B47, 109 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. C G Koutroulos, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys17, 1069 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Y Kurihara, Y Akaishi and H Tanaka, Phys. Rev. C 31, 971 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. G A Lalazissis, M E Grypeos and S E Massen, Phys. Rev. C 37, 2098 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. J R James and B Ram, Nucl. Phys. A 140, 688 (1970)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. P B Siegel and M Farrow Reid, Am. J. Phys.  58, 1016 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. T Motoba, H Bandō, R Wunsch and J Žofka, Phys. Rev. C 38, 1322 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. D J Millener, C B Dover and A Gal, Phys. Rev. C 38, 2700 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. J Mareš and J Žofka, Z. Phys. A 33, 209 (1989)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. D Halderson, Phys. Rev. C 48, 581 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J Hao, T T S Kuo, A Reuber, K Holinde, J Speth and D J Millener, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1498 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. R H Dalitz, D H Davis and D N Tovee, Nucl. Phys. A 450, 311c (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. L Majling, V A Kuz’min and T V Tetereva, Phys. At. Nuclei 67, 1804 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. L Majling, Yu A Batusov, J Lukstins and A N Parfenov, Nucl. Phys. A 754, 184c (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. L Majling, V A Kuzmin and T V Tetereva, Phys. At. Nuclei 69, 810 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. K P Santhosh, Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 127 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. K P Santhosh and C Nithya, J. Nucl. Phys. Mater. Rad. Appl4, 337 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. K P Santhosh and A Joseph, Pramana – J. Phys62, 957 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. K P Santhosh, Pramana – J. Phys. 85, 447 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. K P Santhosh, P V Subha and B Priyanka, Pramana – J. Phys. 86, 819 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. J Blocki, J Randrup, W J Swiatecki and C F Tsang, Ann. Phys. (NY) 105, 427 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. J Blocki and W J Swiatecki, Ann. Phys. (NY) 132, 53 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. D N Poenaru, M Ivascu, A Sandulescu and W Greiner, Phys. Rev. C 32, 572 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. C G Koutroulos and G J Papadopoulos, Prog. Theor. Phys. 90, 1039 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. D H Templeton, J J Howland and I Perlman, Phys. Rev. C 72, 758 (1947)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. M Wang, G Audi, F G Kondev, W J Huang, S Naimi and X Xu, Chin. Phys. C 41, 030003 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. C Samanta, P Roy Chowdhury and D N Basu, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys32, 363 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. G Lévai, J Cseh, P Van Isacker and O Juillet, Phys. Lett. B 433, 250 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. A S Botvina and J P Pochodzalla, Phys. Rev. C 76, 024909 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory (https://www.nndc.bnl.gov)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K P Santhosh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santhosh, K.P., Nithya, C. Theoretical studies on the \(\alpha \) decay half-lives of hyper and normal isotopes of Po. Pramana - J Phys 90, 35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-018-1528-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-018-1528-y

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation