Single-particle and collective structures in Cr55 and V55

A. N. Deacon, D. Steppenbeck, S. Zhu, S. J. Freeman, R. V. F. Janssens, M. P. Carpenter, B. Fornal, M. Honma, B. P. Kay, F. G. Kondev, J. Kozemczak, A. Larabee, T. Lauritsen, C. J. Lister, A. P. Robinson, D. Seweryniak, J. F. Smith, Y. Sun, X. Wang, F. R. Xu, and Y.-C. Yang
Phys. Rev. C 83, 064305 – Published 7 June 2011

Abstract

Excited states in V55 and Cr55 have been populated via pn and 2n evaporation channels, respectively, following the fusion of a Ca48 beam at 172 MeV with a Be9 target. Level schemes have been deduced for the two nuclides to excitation energies of 7467 (V55) and 12226 keV (Cr55), with spins of 27/2+ and 33/2+, respectively. Negative-parity states are compared with shell-model calculations using three different effective interactions in the full fp model space. Negative-parity levels of Cr55 are explained in terms of single-particle fp-shell configurations outside N=28 and N=32 cores. Positive-parity states in both isotopes show evidence for the involvement of neutron g9/2 configurations. In the case of Cr55, a quasirotational structure based on the 1/2+[440] Nilsson orbital is observed up to the terminating state. In V55, positive-parity states do not exhibit well-developed collective features, and the observation of octupole decays is an indication of their importance in transitions from neutron g9/2 configurations to the fp shell. Experimental results are compared with the predictions of a traditional shell model, the projected shell model, and total-Routhian-surface calculations.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 21 March 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.83.064305

©2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

A. N. Deacon1,*, D. Steppenbeck1,†, S. Zhu2, S. J. Freeman1, R. V. F. Janssens2, M. P. Carpenter2, B. Fornal3, M. Honma4, B. P. Kay1,‡, F. G. Kondev2, J. Kozemczak5, A. Larabee5, T. Lauritsen2, C. J. Lister2, A. P. Robinson2,§, D. Seweryniak2, J. F. Smith1,∥, Y. Sun6,7,8, X. Wang2,¶, F. R. Xu9, and Y.-C. Yang6

  • 1Schuster Laboratory, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
  • 2Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 3Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland
  • 4Center for Mathematical Sciences, University of Aizu, Tsuruga, Ikki-machi, Aizu-Wakamatsu, Fukushima 965-8580, Japan
  • 5Physics Department, Greenville College, Greenville, Illinois 62246, USA
  • 6Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People’s Republic of China
  • 7Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, People’s Republic of China
  • 8Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
  • 9Department of Technical Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China

  • *alick.deacon@manchester.ac.uk
  • Present address: RIKEN Nishina Center, 2-1, Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
  • Present address: Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
  • §Present address: Schuster Laboratory, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
  • Present address: School of Engineering, University of the West of Scotland, High Street, Paisley PA1 2BE, United Kingdom.
  • Present address: Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 83, Iss. 6 — June 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×